The Syndicate

Made wrote: ↑Mon Jul 17, 2017 7:03 pm Dom,
I apologize. I would hate to be that guy, but I feel like your proof uses a few unfounded assertions.

Elohcin wrote: ↑Mon Jul 17, 2017 8:30 pm

Dom wrote: ↑Mon Jul 17, 2017 6:46 pm hi everyone what up

also i pick unicorn
unicorns are gay
i'm gay
therefore
unicorns win
QED

I think unicorn comes in second for me. What makes you say unicorns are gay?

Dom wrote: ↑Mon Jul 17, 2017 10:24 pmyay elo! <3

LoRab wrote: ↑Tue Jul 18, 2017 1:06 pm

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 18, 2017 12:52 pm What's a FEB?

It stands for Fucking Evil Bastard (or Bitch, depending on whom it is describing). It's a term of endearment, for dastardly genius kind of baddies. :FEB: is the official FEB smiley, created by Long Con, at my request, and based loosely on a player who hasn't played for a very long time.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 18, 2017 3:06 pm I am good at reading: Dom, LC, Nut, Speed

I can kinda read: Doc, Golden, Tony

I always scum read: DF, Eloh

I'm not so great at reading: Epi, Sprityo, INH, Never

I've never/barely played with: Boom, Made, Rico, Lorab, Timmer

So anybody from the bolded lists I suppose. Back and forthing on my new SL, Sprityo. I'll let his reactions determine how much free pass he gets.

Linki: I miss Marmot.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 18, 2017 6:28 pm

Golden wrote: ↑Tue Jul 18, 2017 6:23 pm

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 18, 2017 6:22 pm Why Boomslang? Why Dom?

Why not?

Sorry. I thought you had a plan.

Dom looks good if he wasn't Dom. Hmm. The meaner Dom is the more town he is? My eye is on Dom but I won't vote him today as is. Likelihood of figuring him out later is too high.

I have trouble voting Boomslang day one cause we've never played together and he/she hasn't posted yet. Unlike Dom, I'm a nice townie.

Linki: Nevermind. Welcome to the party, BS.

Golden wrote: ↑Tue Jul 18, 2017 7:45 pm

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Tue Jul 18, 2017 7:34 pmYou though. What are you doing this game Golden?

What do you think I'm doing?

Golden wrote: ↑Tue Jul 18, 2017 8:08 pm

Made wrote: ↑Tue Jul 18, 2017 8:06 pmGolden- where did I misplaced my keys? I can't seem to find them anywhere!

Check the piano.

Golden wrote: ↑Tue Jul 18, 2017 8:14 pm

nutella wrote: ↑Tue Jul 18, 2017 8:13 pmHi Golden. Are you supatown?

What do you think?

Golden wrote: ↑Tue Jul 18, 2017 8:24 pm The noun is "English Language". Mastery is the, err... verb. And no is the adverb?

Golden wrote: ↑Tue Jul 18, 2017 8:32 pm Voting Dom

Was tempted towards a timmer vote as well, but that would be a policy lynch. Dom isn't.

Golden wrote: ↑Tue Jul 18, 2017 8:46 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Tue Jul 18, 2017 8:45 pm Golden, what makes Dom not a "policy lynch?"

Me actually having grounds to read him as bad.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Tue Jul 18, 2017 10:27 pm Dom

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 19, 2017 12:49 pm How about a halfbow?

Good guys
People who are too quiet
Lorab
Golden
Nutella
Dom
DF
Boomerjack
Sprityo

Golden wrote: ↑Wed Jul 19, 2017 3:14 pm I find the stuff pointed at me hilarious. Anyone who knows me well should have me as nothing but pure green by this point. This is one of those games where I am making absolutely no effort to disguise the fact that I'm on my town meta. There is literally zero about my play that resembles my baddie game. Having said that, I didn't think Jack could read me in the first place

PS Jack - if you want committal, wait for tomorrow. I have two people I'm confident are mafia. I'm just not saying it at night.

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Wed Jul 19, 2017 3:37 pm

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 19, 2017 2:32 pm

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Wed Jul 19, 2017 2:13 pm I'll halfbow, if that's the new thing

Green: Redacted
YellowGreen: Redacted
GreenYellow: Redacted
Yellow: Redacted.
YellowOrange: Epi, spirityo, neverwhere
OrangeYellow: Golden, INH, JOH, LongCon
Orange: Dom
OrangeRed: DF
RedOrange/ Red: None

Why Dom?
Why LC?

Dom is kind of based on consensus, I've really only played with him once but several people have said that he wasn't quite acting himself and what he posted seemed different from how I remember him in Mass Effect. Also, missing a day

LC just feels off to me. I can't point to anything, and his interactions look fine on paper.

@Speed I didn't really like DF's Day 0 posts, so that's a slight scum read, then he gave a Day 1 post of I'm voting for somebody because weird reasons, which seems unhelpful. Plus, low post count but split between phases, which seems more scummish than missing a phase.

Golden wrote: ↑Wed Jul 19, 2017 5:10 pm lol, dom with the big no u.

I don't have to answer a question just because someone asks it. They didn't answer my questions either. As Jack said 'I'm a raptor testing the fence'.

speedchuck wrote: ↑Wed Jul 19, 2017 5:15 pm

I think. Anyway, why do you read Nutella as town?

Golden wrote: ↑Wed Jul 19, 2017 5:20 pm Because he's on her baddie team.

Screw it, night or not. 95% sure nutella is bad, enough that I intended to place my vote immediately upon day starting. About 80% that Dom is on a team with her.

Nutella's iso is noncommittal. People should have a look. I don't buy that she couldn't make up her mind on the vote and was too late... I think she has a vote manipulation role and didn't want to risk creating information through her vote in such a tight vote. She's tiptoeing around things, especially her read of me.

Golden wrote: ↑Wed Jul 19, 2017 6:01 pm My current "town core" as I see it

Me
speechuck (heh, that was an accident, but I ain't fixing it)
Wilgy
Rico
Epi
LoRab
Maybe inh and eloh as well, but I find them harder to be sure of
I'd like to throw Tony in but I don't know him well enough

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Wed Jul 19, 2017 6:04 pm @dom It apparently was more Golden talking than I thought, I might move you up a slot. Epi had voted for you, and Jack said you would look good if you weren't Dom. Speedchuck was defending you but put you at Orange in the rainbow, so I figured there was more.

Epi did something like that too.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 19, 2017 6:10 pm @Dom

I suspected you for not doing all the things you are now doing.

Lolololol....lolololol

Linki: Hilarious, TSP

Golden wrote: ↑Wed Jul 19, 2017 6:45 pm Why do you think Dom is good? I think Dom is bad because look at his big post when he came back and specifically what he said about nutella.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 19, 2017 6:48 pm

Golden wrote: ↑Wed Jul 19, 2017 6:45 pm Why do you think Dom is good? I think Dom is bad because look at his big post when he came back and specifically what he said about nutella.

Tone.

Compare ASOUE and ME Dom.

I've never seen bad Dom, though. I may be putting too much emphasis on my ability to read him.

Golden wrote: ↑Wed Jul 19, 2017 6:58 pm Dom could be good... I'm not convinced he is bad. But I do think he is very nutella compatible.

Golden wrote: ↑Wed Jul 19, 2017 7:21 pm

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 19, 2017 7:15 pmSo now Dom and Nut could both be bad individually? That's a quick jump from Dom being scum because he's defending Nutella to just Nutella being bad to just Dom being bad.

And that's a big jump from me voting for dom BEFORE he defended nutella to trying to imply that I suddenly wouldn't think dom was bad if I didn't think nutella was.

speedchuck wrote: ↑Wed Jul 19, 2017 10:59 pm Does anyone have any theories as to why nutella would have been killed? I'm not used to having flips on lynch and not on nightkill.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Wed Jul 19, 2017 11:00 pm TonyStarkPrime voted last minute on somebody who wasn't getting lynched.

He is Marcus Vanston.

Golden wrote: ↑Wed Jul 19, 2017 11:40 pm Here's one:

"I had no hand in deciding that Nutella should die, nor do I know her affiliation"

And for the record, I don't think that's what Dom was doing, LC. If he was, he would have said so.

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 12:58 am @Dom's kinda question

1. I noted that I thought that you were acting kinda suspicious.
2. Of a consensus from players who know your meta was saying something was off, of course I'd take that into consideration. If everyone is suspicious of someone and could provide reasons why, I'd probably be suspicious too.

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 12:59 am

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 12:34 am INH, gth who is bad?

The whole entire world...

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 1:13 am

At the time Golden was accusing you, you were MIA and I leaned town on Golden. So I trusted those reads a bit.

You started talking and the reasons behind those reads dissipated. And then you and Golden started your giant lynch battle and some new ones potentially arose. I'll have to read over your guys' interactions with Nut and each other after I get some much deserved sleep.

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 1:13 am

A question for now: Dom, what do you think points most to Golden being bad? Golden, what points most to Dom being bad?

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 1:20 am

Dom wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 1:03 am

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 12:59 am

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 12:34 am INH, gth who is bad?

The whole entire world...

Care to answer the question?

Would your read of me be affected if I cared not to?

Golden wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 1:40 am

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 1:13 am

Dom wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 1:03 am

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 12:58 am @Dom's kinda question

1. I noted that I thought that you were acting kinda suspicious.
2. Of a consensus from players who know your meta was saying something was off, of course I'd take that into consideration. If everyone is suspicious of someone and could provide reasons why, I'd probably be suspicious too.

Do you have any reason to trust any of these reads?
Did you plan on following up on those reads?

At the time Golden was accusing you, you were MIA and I leaned town on Golden. So I trusted those reads a bit.

You started talking and the reasons behind those reads dissipated. And then you and Golden started your giant lynch battle and some new ones potentially arose. I'll have to read over your guys' interactions with Nut and each other after I get some much deserved sleep.


A question for now: Dom, what do you think points most to Golden being bad? Golden, what points most to Dom being bad?

His entire contribution to the game is one big no u. Dom is trying to shield his lack of actual content behind a single case that he's only picked up because I voted for him.

I've been on a scum team with Dom a lot. I've seen his brain from the inside. Nothing about this Dom looks remotely town to me.

Golden wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 1:42 am Anyone who actually suspects me, please just vote for me. Let's expose the bullshitters for what they are. There is literally zero chance Dom thinks I'm on my bad game, he knows me far too well for that, and I'm beginning to worry about ricos persostance as well.

Golden wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 2:32 am Gah, that didn't come out right. The point is, I left the 5% intentionally to insure it would be LDable and you could bridge the gap with meta.

Thanks for quoting where Dom made this a false dilemma right before accusing me of doing the same

Long Con wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 10:06 am Lie Detector rules. The concept that Carlos can't Lie Detect statements that are made for Lie Detection, like "I am one of the Citizens of Night Vale", "I am Civilian", "I'm not Mafia", etc. I don't know if such rules are in place for this game.

Dom, were you not making the point that Golden was skirting answering your questions to him as LD avoidance? I thought I was agreeing with you, but maybe it's entirely my idea.

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 11:21 am A question to Dom: if Golden is bad, who is bad but not on the same team?

Golden wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 3:07 pm

Long Con wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 10:06 amI don't believe that, that sounds like something you made up after the accusation

Well, you're wrong. I never lie about stupid shit like that.

I think everyone should just vote me out at this point.

I am literally never bad when everyone thinks I'm bad in the first couple of days. I don't understand why no-one ever wakes up to this point. When I'm doing dodgy shit, that means I'm town. But I'm kinda bored of being in defensive mode against anyone and everyone

Dom.

If you won't listen to me today, listen to me tomorrow, eh?

Dom is bad
Jack is probably bad
LC is probably bad

I think I hit a few baddie nerves very early in this game and they want to deal with it by getting me lynched. So fine, but I want to expose it for what it is. No-one who knows me well at all would believe me to be bad at this point.

Golden wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 4:27 pm Here's why I think LC is bad.

Bad LC forgets to play the ball. He gets driven into arguments that look good in semantics, but actually betray a lack of full thought. In this case, the ball is 'golden is avoiding LD statements'.

What is the first thing a person might do if they genuinely thought another player was avoiding LD statements? I would iso that player to see if it's accurate. I'd actually go look at how many LD statements they've made. I invite anyone to do that now.

You will see that my post history is full of 100% ironclad LD statements. My guess is that most of them amount to someone saying 'golden is bad' and me replying by saying 'you're wrong'. Because anyone who says I am bad is wrong. But I'm sure I've also given any number of other things that amount to 'I am civilian' or 'I am not bad'.

Instead, LC decides to fixate on the one statement I made that I knew could have the same effect even if all of those other statements were not allowed. He ignores the fact that I said 'I've made plenty' before making that one. He doesn't check to see if that's correct. He just fixates on the new ones I'm trying to think of that might enable me to beat any particular rule that could be in place. He wants to hang me because 'I don't know what rule might be in place', but if I actually were bad, don't you think I'd have asked what rule was in place?

I give him one that ought to be tailored right to his wheelhouse. LC has seen me in action both as a teammate and host. He knows that I do not bail on taking part of a team for any phase unless I really have to. What's his comeback? He agrees that I wouldn't fail to take part if I could, but I might have been too busy. A person who has a real suspicion, and was playing the ball, would go and look to see if that made sense in context, not just throw it out as a hypothetical. In fact, looking at the thread, it is very clear that I was entirely here and could have taken part.

LC is playing me, the player, he isn't actually looking to see whether I'm making LD statements.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Btw, I'd also like to point out, in terms of 'towniness meter', that while I've thrown out reads on nearly everyone in the game without problem (and been happy to adapt those reads), this has been generally criticised by the same people who see me as bad. In the mean time, I think a quick iso of Dom and LC would show you a distinct lack of reads. They are getting by, mostly focusing on me.

Dom and LC, want to prove you aren't bad? Start engaging with more than your cases on me.

At this point, if I had my vote back, I'd probably lean a vote on LC before Dom. Dom tunnels do happen from town Dom, and I can see how me voting him could get under his skin in a way. But LCs tunnels are usually well reasoned - even if the theories are out there, they fit with a thoughtful analysis of the facts. This is completely lacking here... he isn't taking a step back to consider what I'm saying, it's just discredit discredit discredit. This is my experience of bad LC. I remember another game... Bullets over Broadway maybe? Where the same thing happened.

Elohcin wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 5:34 pm Okay, that was a lot to read. First, LC because I was reading about him most recently. I don't see how anyone can think him as bad quite yet. His posts have been either half-hearted and sober or nonsense and drunken. I don't understand why dom suspects golden. Its seems we all see a civ golden here. I'm not sure if going after dom for a noU reaction is smart, but perhaps for his squirmy disposition. Then there's the bad guy with +2 votes....... Marcus. This may be the most sensible option. Epi noticed Tony may be a good candidate for that role. My vote will either go to him or Dom today unless something changes.

On a side note, someone else mentioned that I voted early yesterday. Y'all are just a bunch or procrastinators is what it is.

Oh yeah, and I wanted to mention that I don't think Rico was cursed by anything Day 1. He was just being silly all on his own. But I do think he is cursed today. And someone mentioned that Poppy is from another game (can't remember who). Whoever cirsed rico was probably in that game as well if you care to narrow down the insanifier.

Golden wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 7:37 pm I don't know why you keep asking me to answer questions I'm not going to answer thinking you'll get a different response. I'm not sure why you keep talking about accountability. Neither of these things is indicative of me on my baddie game, which you know.

Golden wrote: ↑Tue Jul 18, 2017 8:32 pm Voting Dom

Was tempted towards a timmer vote as well, but that would be a policy lynch. Dom isn't.

Golden wrote: ↑Tue Jul 18, 2017 6:31 pm

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 18, 2017 6:28 pmThe meaner Dom is the more town he is?

That's an interesting perspective. I don't think I would say that... I see in Dom what I see in LC, there is more of a truthiness/earnestness to their town play that they have trouble replicating in tone when bad. What you think of as 'mean', I'd call 'genuine hunting'.

Having said that, this is a two team game, so genuine hunting isn't inherently town-leaning. Everyone should be doing it.

Golden wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 7:48 pm

Dom wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 7:46 pm Actually answering the questions I pose would be not only just one way to get me to not suspect you, but a way to, you know, engage in a game.

Are you going to suggest I'm not engaged in the game?

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 7:46 pm

Dom wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 7:39 pm That's an outright lie considering I've tried to engage with INH (he all but ignored me), have made multiple points of contact with Tony, and just probed Eloh.

But cute.


You can't say you were suspicious of me since day 1 AND also say that my Night 1 rebuke of you is teh source of your suspicion, Golden. Which is it? I've asked this question before, and you've ignored it because you have no answer. Sad !

*Sad!*

Dom wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 7:28 pm is something Donald Trump would say about critics
Be better than Donald Trump.

:cheeky:

Golden wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 7:55 pm

Dom wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 7:48 pm

Golden wrote: ↑Tue Jul 18, 2017 8:32 pm Voting Dom

Was tempted towards a timmer vote as well, but that would be a policy lynch. Dom isn't.

What's your reason for voting me here?

It was gut. I think you're absence, while probably explained by real life, was in part tactical. Because I've seen how you use tactical absence as a baddie.

sprityo wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 7:56 pm Dom, can you tell me real quick why youre not voting golden, even though he has already voted for you.

Golden wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 8:00 pm

Dom wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 7:57 pm

Golden wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 7:55 pm

Dom wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 7:48 pm

Golden wrote: ↑Tue Jul 18, 2017 8:32 pm Voting Dom

Was tempted towards a timmer vote as well, but that would be a policy lynch. Dom isn't.

What's your reason for voting me here?

It was gut. I think you're absence, while probably explained by real life, was in part tactical. Because I've seen how you use tactical absence as a baddie.

You previously have said you already have stated that. Can you find the post? I can't.

I'm on my phone. I said it was gut at least once. I think you have in fact already criticised me for it.

Golden wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 8:00 pm

Dom wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 7:58 pm I thought the poll ended friday?

It's a speed game...

It's this stuff from you I don't buy.

Golden wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 8:02 pm

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 8:00 pm

Golden wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 7:57 pm

Dom wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 7:50 pm

Golden wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 7:48 pm

Dom wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 7:46 pm Actually answering the questions I pose would be not only just one way to get me to not suspect you, but a way to, you know, engage in a game.

Are you going to suggest I'm not engaged in the game?

No.
I'm suggesting that you are avoiding engaging with me in any genuine way.

That's true. With wilgy too. Why do you think that indicates I'm bad? Have you considered any other reasons why it might be?

This post does not make me feel great about Golden.

Why? I've been entirely open about the fact that I don't intend to engage with these massive cases on me and copious questioning. Why would it come as a surprise to you now that I'm open about it?

The most important question is, why does that make me bad? The only logical response I can see is 'because I don't like it'. You don't have to like it.

Golden wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 8:16 pm

Dom wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 8:14 pm Golden, maybe you shouldn't just skim my posts for your name

Maybe you should take me less seriously. I'd rather lc die than you.

Elohcin wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 8:12 pm Dom. I don't like this back and forth you're having with golden. I think golden is civ, and even though this may be civ on civ, I don't think it is. You seem to be tunneling. Yes, you recently started engaging with others, but I think it's only to try to save yourself/make yourself look better. The interactions don't seem very genuine. Golden, on the other hand, has not only been taking part in the back and forth with you, but has also been playing what looks like a genuine and meaningful game, engaging in other conversations. It seems as though you may feel stuck in hole and you're only focused on climbing out of that hole. I've been in that position before as a baddie and know what it's like. I just cannot decide if I ought to vote you or take a chance that Tony may be marcus. It would be great to get any baddie today, but awesome to get the +2 vote guy.

With that in mind... what's the general thoughts on tony being marcus? It was mentioned and talked about a little bit earlier today but I haven't heard a general consensus. I don't stay up late like many of you and I need to vote soon. I'd love some feedback on my thoughts.

sprityo wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 8:26 pm Alright i think i see what youre getting at, Golden, and i can see why speedchuck would agree with you on voting LC, even though you already voted dom for, pressure was it? or it was just a gut read that you are okay with but still think LC is a better lynch?

linki:

Dom wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 8:23 pm golden has no fucking interest in anything i say that doesn't pertain to him.

golden is the only one responding to what i'm even saying so there's a erason why

well arent you just directing it all TOWARDS Golden?

Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 8:27 pm

Dom wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 8:02 pm

Golden wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 8:00 pm

Dom wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 7:58 pm I thought the poll ended friday?

It's a speed game...

It's this stuff from you I don't buy.

I seriously doubt you think I am bad.
If I had BTSC, I would have definitely already asked them when the phase ended.

This I don't buy.

I have hosted so many games and been bad many times, and lately, BTSC is quiet. People go for days without talking.

I find it hard to believe that you would ask your teammates when the phase ended rather than take two seconds to scroll upward and look at the poll deadline.

sprityo wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 8:30 pm I want to give dom a chance to restart during the night phase, so im inclined to Vote LC

linki: @Dom, youre not helping yourself by getting defensive and flustered. Continuing to act that way will get people to vote you, like Eloh just did

Elohcin wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 8:28 pm

Dom wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 8:11 pm lynch me
i don't want to play if this is how we play now.

watch out for timmer never actually catching up. that's classic baddie timmer.
When I come up civ, remember how wrong Golden was. Remember how I was told repeatedly that I had written nothing when I wrote many posts giving well thought out reasons for him being bad

Watch out for INH hiding behind being *quirky*

Watch out Elo pretending she can't read my posts.

WTF Dom, give a lady time to respond. I may be in the kitchen vacuuming up pepper that my 5 year old spilt all over the floor when reaching for a banana. Seriously. It just happened.

Thank you sprit for your response. I've made up my mind.

dom

Golden wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 8:32 pm

Dom wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 8:11 pmwatch out for timmer never actually catching up. that's classic baddie timmer.
When I come up civ, remember how wrong Golden was. Remember how I was told repeatedly that I had written nothing when I wrote many posts giving well thought out reasons for him being bad

Watch out for INH hiding behind being *quirky*

Watch out Elo pretending she can't read my posts.

I love this post by the way. It's the point at which my mind on Dom began to turn.