The Syndicate

Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2018 10:50 pm I was the original Button Pusher in CC-123. It redistributed all the roles in the game. Pushing the button is a good idea any time, anywhere. Push it real good.

Oh yes... push that button real Good! OH~

Hi everyone. My name is DrWilgy and at long last... I'm finally a doctor.

How are we?

Well shit just realized I missed the poll. I thought I had another day for this. Sorry y'all.

Also...

Whaaaatsuuuuuuuup duuuuudes

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Feb 24, 2018 1:00 am
Kylemii wrote: ↑Sat Feb 24, 2018 12:54 am though the two roles thing will probably extend things anyways so maybe that's realistic?
Another possibility that crossed my mind is that, as players die, they will either change trbes or be sent to the "main" game thread.

But this is why I askes about tribal mechanics in Survivor Mafia. I didn't play in the game and don't feel like looking it up, so I'm hoping someone who was there can explain it to me. Scotty was the game's host, I believe.

Why?

What a fun game we have going on. [mention]Sloonei[/mention], why exactly did you hop on INH at the start of this game?

Kylemii wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 6:43 pm I don't consider myself knowledgeable enough to break this tie under these circumstances. I really need to throw up more but I don't want to miss the vote

[VOTE: ninja] aubergine to maintain the tie

I've decided your a fucking hero and a partiot.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Feb 26, 2018 3:00 pm
DrWilgy wrote: ↑Mon Feb 26, 2018 2:39 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Feb 24, 2018 1:00 am
Kylemii wrote: ↑Sat Feb 24, 2018 12:54 am though the two roles thing will probably extend things anyways so maybe that's realistic?
Another possibility that crossed my mind is that, as players die, they will either change trbes or be sent to the "main" game thread.

But this is why I askes about tribal mechanics in Survivor Mafia. I didn't play in the game and don't feel like looking it up, so I'm hoping someone who was there can explain it to me. Scotty was the game's host, I believe.
Why?

What a fun game we have going on. Sloonei, why exactly did you hop on INH at the start of this game?
I don't understand what you're asking about in the first question.

I went after INH to start the game because he was here and he was somebody that would respond to me and who others could potentially talk about as well.

Sorry...

More so, what would have pondering the reult of death and tribal gameplay lead you to?

And that was your sole reasoning for INH?

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Feb 26, 2018 3:38 pm
Scotty wrote: ↑Mon Feb 26, 2018 3:25 pm
Just would like to point out that Sloon didn’t even mention INH as a suspect until I threw his name out as someone that looked blendy. Whether or not he actually agreed with lynch perception beforehand is WIFOM.
what does this mean to you?

Scotty's point is what actually caused my curiosity here.

Sloonei, I don't believe your reason for bringing up INH is legitimate. I feel like if it was, you would've mentioned Scotty's suspicion in your response to me.

nijuukyugou wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 7:02 pm
Golden wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 6:48 pm
"No other thought entered my mind" Boomslang declared "as if we would be distracted by petty nonsense." Boomslang was mostly distracted by ninja.

Bewbs

Where? What?

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Feb 26, 2018 3:54 pm
DrWilgy wrote: ↑Mon Feb 26, 2018 3:46 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Feb 26, 2018 3:38 pm
Scotty wrote: ↑Mon Feb 26, 2018 3:25 pm
Just would like to point out that Sloon didn’t even mention INH as a suspect until I threw his name out as someone that looked blendy. Whether or not he actually agreed with lynch perception beforehand is WIFOM.
what does this mean to you?
Scotty's point is what actually caused my curiosity here.

Sloonei, I don't believe your reason for bringing up INH is legitimate. I feel like if it was, you would've mentioned Scotty's suspicion in your response to me.
why? Scotty's mention of INH was not a factor at all in my discussion of INH. Our observations about INH were in stark contrast to each other. Scotty labeled him as "blendy" because he had not noticed any of the things INH had said. On the other hand, INH stood out to me because of a few specific posts he had made.
I asked Scotty for a read because he was here. At the same time, I wanted to talk about INH. we each only had about three players to choose from at the time, so it's really not surprising that we ended up on the same subject.

Regardless of contrasting views or not, you want me to believe that Scotty discussing INH only a few posts prior to your discussion on INH were unrelated?

It looked like an opportunistic offence against INH only following someones suspicion.

sig wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2018 11:07 am A really ballsy/crazy scum team would. So like wilgy, mac, marmot, but i don't think a more traditional team would

If bloops was on my team, I would've opted to kill either myself or another teammate before her.

JoH is civilian. Tell me why I think this.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2018 2:32 pm I still would like to know why you (and wilgy) think it would be suspicious of me to follow your comments about INH with my own suspicion of him. Even if that was what I did, I would not view it as a good scum strategy, so I don't know why the angle should be pursued.

Like I said, it looked like an opportunistic push on someone. There was the starting of momentum towards INH and you were like "ok this is a thing now."

Even if you and Scotty had contrasting ideas, not mentioning that he had presence there already when I asked my question, feels off.

Boomslang wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2018 6:56 pm
DrWilgy wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2018 2:08 pm
sig wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2018 11:07 am A really ballsy/crazy scum team would. So like wilgy, mac, marmot, but i don't think a more traditional team would
If bloops was on my team, I would've opted to kill either myself or another teammate before her.
Can you give any reason for this, other than a flat denial of the possibility?

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2018 6:32 pm JoH is civilian. Tell me why I think this.
Because he's done some really good comparative analysis to suggest a w/w connection between Sig and Sloonei? Also, despite admitting that he can "tunnel good Sloonei" early in the game, he's choosing to take the risk and put opinions out there. I don't see him going this deep down the tunnel unless he really believes his case.

Mainly because I don't like killing my friends, plus Bloops avatar makes me happy.

You thought about JoH being Civ more than me clearly.

I have dancing queen stuck in my head. Help.

Ok mother fuckers.

I got a nit to pick.

First thing is first. I think the silencer is amongst those who asked me for a response on my civ JoH read.

2nd thing 2nd. JoH is civilian because of his interactions with bloop day one. I don't think mafia JoH would be on a team that NK'd a civilian bloop. It is plausible if they are on the same team, but I doknt think bloop is bad.

Daisy. Come at me. Fight Me! I love you. Fiiiiight meeee.

I vote for me DrWoogy.

Scotty wrote: ↑Sat Mar 03, 2018 8:19 pm
DrWilgy wrote: ↑Sat Mar 03, 2018 7:22 pm First thing is first. I think the silencer is amongst those who asked me for a response on my civ JoH read.

2nd thing 2nd. JoH is civilian because of his interactions with bloop day one. I don't think mafia JoH would be on a team that NK'd a civilian bloop. It is plausible if they are on the same team, but I doknt think bloop is bad.

Daisy. Come at me. Fight Me! I love you. Fiiiiight meeee.

I vote for me DrWoogy.
Welcome back to absentee land.

What do you think of me and Sloonei?

Also why didn’t you vote for someone else in the thread after it was all but assumed you were silenced? What good is a self vote at that point? Makes me really not buy the whole silent routine..

Sloonei is bad still and you are... here. Idk haven't really saw anything that made me attracted tok you... except that sweet ass... But that's a matter for another time.

I was going to vote LoRab, but wasn't here unfortunately.

Why the hell would I fake silencing? Would that gain me anything if I was taking silence as a civ or baddie?

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Mar 04, 2018 1:07 pm
DrWilgy wrote: ↑Sat Mar 03, 2018 7:22 pm First thing is first. I think the silencer is amongst those who asked me for a response on my civ JoH read.
why?

Because it makes sense to hit someone with a silence when there information is trying to be gained. Asking to further gain the information and for me to not deliver would put a negative on me. All in all, it makes me think I was right about both JoH and Bloops though.

What do you think?

Scotty wrote: ↑Sun Mar 04, 2018 12:00 am
DrWilgy wrote: ↑Sat Mar 03, 2018 10:25 pm
Scotty wrote: ↑Sat Mar 03, 2018 8:19 pm
DrWilgy wrote: ↑Sat Mar 03, 2018 7:22 pm First thing is first. I think the silencer is amongst those who asked me for a response on my civ JoH read.

2nd thing 2nd. JoH is civilian because of his interactions with bloop day one. I don't think mafia JoH would be on a team that NK'd a civilian bloop. It is plausible if they are on the same team, but I doknt think bloop is bad.

Daisy. Come at me. Fight Me! I love you. Fiiiiight meeee.

I vote for me DrWoogy.
Welcome back to absentee land.

What do you think of me and Sloonei?

Also why didn’t you vote for someone else in the thread after it was all but assumed you were silenced? What good is a self vote at that point? Makes me really not buy the whole silent routine..
Sloonei is bad still and you are... here. Idk haven't really saw anything that made me attracted tok you... except that sweet ass... But that's a matter for another time.

I was going to vote LoRab, but wasn't here unfortunately.

Why the hell would I fake silencing? Would that gain me anything if I was taking silence as a civ or baddie?
That’s the whimsical Wilgy I remember.

Why were you leaning LoRab in particular? I think I did see you vote that way originally. So you’re saying you were away basically the last 24 hours and that’s why you didn’t change your vote?

Mmk, I can believe that.

RE: faking silencing- I’ve seen odder strategies out there. I had a game on another site where I was the silencer and chose to “silence” myself because I wanted heat off my back.

I dunno, I’m actially feeling better about you Wilgy. Can’t put my finger on it though.

In regards to LoRab, I don't know. Before yesterday I held her in a bucket of players that seemed floaty. She was supposed to receive my vote, but now I think she's one of my top civ reads.

Scotty I need to reread your posts. I no longer feel good about you. You've seen order strategies, but if you can't name what I was trying to gain from taking a silence it just doesn't make sense.

Are you backtracking?

@Sloonei, is there any player on their side that you wpould hope to see lynched? Can you call anyone over there a supatown?

Kylemii wrote: ↑Sun Mar 04, 2018 2:01 pm
DrWilgy wrote: ↑Sun Mar 04, 2018 1:18 pmIn regards to LoRab, I don't know. Before yesterday I held her in a bucket of players that seemed floaty. She was supposed to receive my vote, but now I think she's one of my top civ reads.
help me to understand why

Nah, you figure it out.

In regards to the people who bugged me about JoH while I was silenced. I feel the worst about Scotty. Followed by Boomslanf and Marmot.

I've been thinking about life and the moral quandaries of the universe and I've hit a point where I'm no longer suspicious of Sloonbread. However, what makes you think that the silencer is a civilian role? Also when would a civilian opt to silence?

I'm also starting to think Bloops 2 may be bad.

Hmmm... Baddies are Scotty, Daisy, and Bloops... and Kyle... fuck you Kyle, you beautiful Frito pie.

I just had one of those horrifying "what if everyone is a baddie except me and they are all anonymous in their BTSC trying to hunt me down" type of thoughts.

No silencer N1. Bloop dies. Silencer N2 and they target me... seems straightforward to me, but that makes me doubt myself. I also dont have much of an opinion of bloop 2 which tosses an interrobang above my head.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Mar 04, 2018 3:31 pm @nijuukyugou what are your thoughts on Wilgy and the silencer?

More specifically @Nijuukugou can you describe why a silence like this could be a civilian action?

Lemme just clean out the shmuck...

Scotty wrote: ↑Sun Mar 04, 2018 3:59 pmSeems like an opinion to me

Perhaps "opinions on what she has stated" is what I should've said.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Mar 04, 2018 5:12 pmI also just had the thought that perhaps our button role realigns the tribes.

Plz no.

nijuukyugou wrote: ↑Sun Mar 04, 2018 7:15 pm
DrWilgy wrote: ↑Sun Mar 04, 2018 3:25 pm I just had one of those horrifying "what if everyone is a baddie except me and they are all anonymous in their BTSC trying to hunt me down" type of thoughts.

No silencer N1. Bloop dies. Silencer N2 and they target me... seems straightforward to me, but that makes me doubt myself. I also dont have much of an opinion of bloop 2 which tosses an interrobang above my head.
Errrrrr wait, you think I might be bad but then don’t have an opinion about me, literally like two posts later? That’s a bit...incongruous.

To answer Sloonei’s question, I think Wilgy is throwing poop to see where it sticks. It was a rather short time between suspecting me and then saying he doesn’t know about me, so either he’s lying or really doesn’t know what he wants to say. THIS, my friends, is the definition of floundering. I'm leaning towards the lying at this point, about suspecting me and possibly about being silenced, which goes with my speculation Day 3 that there were too many people being quiet for it to be a silencing sort of deal. *throws gauntlet*

I think Sloonbread put it well. I have no suspicion of you for what you've stated this game. Rather the fact you were received a new role and I was silenced immediately after

Same thing I asked scotty. What would I gain from a fake silencing?

[mention]sig[/mention] why would you vote for me? What caused the flip flop?

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Mar 05, 2018 12:06 am
DrWilgy wrote: ↑Sun Mar 04, 2018 11:48 pm @sig why would you vote for me? What caused the flip flop?
What do you think of INH? I feel like he could be bad given how much he's faded the last few days. I know he just started hosting his own game, but he's provided next to nothing since Night 2.

I damn near forgot he was in the game, but I guess that's what my pickle with you earlier was about.

Unsure really. By association with or against (not really sure the best term) Scotty I'd say he's good but I'd need to reread to make an informed read.

You?

Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Mon Mar 05, 2018 3:34 am To everyone saying that Wilgy is playing like his normal self, please tell me you don't see a difference between his civ game and his mafia game...

Mountain Mafia, where he was bad: Posts

Pirates Mafia, where he was civ: Posts

Seinfeld Mafia, where he was bad: Posts, as Tim Whatley,
which has been renamed Juliet since

Great Gatsby where he was an 3P who could win with anyone: Posts

Pokemon Mafia where he is bad: Posts

Welcome to Night Vale where he was civ: Posts

Fiddler on the Roof where he was civ: Posts

I think if you look at these games you will see that bad Wilgy plays more straight laced. Good Wilgy uses gimmicks. Good Wilgy doesn't play like he cares, he seems to mostly just be having a good time. Bad Wilgy puts a lot more effort into looking good than Good Wilgy. Do not be fooled by him. I don't believe he is good. He started throwing in more jokes once this meta started to get brought up and I'm not buying this!

Daisy here's the problem. I've been purposely playing aloof as civilian for awhile now. People kept mislynching me because I couldn't supatown 5 games in a row. Now we are at a point where I want to play alittle more forward again mainly because it's the GoC.(Also did you see the game where I called out all but one of the baddies in emojis? That was fun.)

To argue this point with history however, did you see my performance during Vocaroo 2? What did you think?

This does make me feel better about you... it seems your vote on me was justified to you, but as someone who works very hard to purposely design their meta, I'd suggest trying to dispute what I've stated in this thread instead of the other ones.

I'm going back to bed now.

Boomslang wrote: ↑Mon Mar 05, 2018 9:44 am
DrWilgy wrote: ↑Sat Mar 03, 2018 10:25 pm Why the hell would I fake silencing? Would that gain me anything if I was taking silence as a civ or baddie?
As a baddie, faking silence gives you a way to control the narrative about you the next day, which you do literally as soon as the day ends.

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Sat Mar 03, 2018 7:22 pm First thing is first. I think the silencer is amongst those who asked me for a response on my civ JoH read.

2nd thing 2nd. JoH is civilian because of his interactions with bloop day one. I don't think mafia JoH would be on a team that NK'd a civilian bloop. It is plausible if they are on the same team, but I doknt think bloop is bad.

Daisy. Come at me. Fight Me! I love you. Fiiiiight meeee.

I vote for me DrWoogy.
All of this wouldn't happen without your silencing, and then you drop another meaningless self vote out of the gate.

Maybe that self vote was because I wanted to see what the other thread was up to.

Actually. I'm willing to aubergine for that one. Boomslang.

LoRab wrote: ↑Mon Mar 05, 2018 12:29 pm Is anyone silenced today? I’m not sure I’m seeing that a baddie would fake a silence when there may or may not be a silencer. Seems like a pretty big risk, since if no one else is silenced, then it becomes pretty obvious. Also, if one fakes a silence and there really is a silencer, then you would have 2 people silenced. So, not sure what I think about wilgy, but I don’t think he faked a silence.

I’m jury duty hell this morning so posting from phone , btw. Hopefully, this will all be done early this afternoon.

Yo I'm a jury duty too. What a coinkidink.

[mention]Spacedaisy[/mention]

that's fair.

In regards to the players who you disagree with their reads of me, who are they and what do you think of them?

[mention]Spacedaisy[/mention] in what way is INH my teammate?

Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Mar 06, 2018 2:57 am
insertnamehere wrote: ↑Mon Mar 05, 2018 7:15 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Mar 05, 2018 6:24 pm Scotty is my top town read because I get a stronger sense from him than anyone else that he's trying to solce the game. He's here, he's engaged and he's not afraid to state his mind. His previous role is the only slight complication.

I'm not concerned with anyone else's stated case against sig right now. My own thoughts on him havd shifted to a town lean. He looks to me like a player who doesn't care about how he is being perceived, which I take as a good thing.

I'm still not inspired by a single word of any case against spacedaisy.
Your reads seem to be solely driven by emotion. And, as you've shown with your suspicion of Boomslang, you seem to be emotionally favorable towards people attempting to work with you and who also agree with your reads, while being judgmental towards those with whom you disagree.

This response just knocked you down a couple of places on my rainbow list.
In spite of all that i just said, this post set off alarms left and right for me. It feels calculated and it's off base. INH is, I think, referencing my post from earlier when I observed that I've seldom agreed with Boomslang in this game and, in that same post, that I was unsure what this meant for Boom's alignment. In various other posts I've expressed unrelated reasons for suspecting Boomslang. Also in various other posts I've expressed strong townreads on players who disagree with me. Jack was my probablt my strongest town read on Day 1, and the basis of this was that he was aggressively pursuing me as his top suspect. I currently list Spacedaisy as a top town read while she is campaigning to lynch DrWilgy, a player who I also read as town. I have no idea where INH is pulling this interpretation of me from.

I also don't know what he means when says my reads seem to be driven by emotion, or why that is to be considered a bad thing. I try to read people emotionally, I guess. It's part of my approach to the game.

This post felt like it was conceived of for the purpose of arriving at a negative conclusion about me, rather than an honest progression of thoughts. "This response knocked you down a couple of places" after referencing a couple of points that are nowhere near the response in question seems to betray a bit of pre-planning and forethought passed off as spontaneity.

Now imagine I said all of this in front of strobe lights and some spacey techno dance beat.

* Darude sandstorm plays in background *

Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Mon Mar 05, 2018 8:26 pm
DrWilgy wrote: ↑Mon Mar 05, 2018 8:14 pm @Spacedaisy in what way is INH my teammate?
When I read that post it just read as super non-committal can go either way on INH kind of feel. Odder still when you consider how hard you defended INH from Sloonei at game start. It just struck me as odd. But that said, I don't have a strong feel on this, it was a gut response to one comment as I was reading through while at work. I wouldn't really even consider basing any kind of vote on this. Just laying out as much of my thoughts as I can.

Omoshiroi desu ne?

I didn't think I was defending INH at the start. I was more so focused on Sloondog. I just remembered that I saw opportunism and didn't like that.

[mention]Boomslang[/mention] why not go check what I was voting for?

I don't think I'll be changing my vote. Apparently you haven't been genuine in your hunting.

In other news. I've been stuck as a juror for the past day and a half with this song stuck in my head the entire time.

This is pretty much my own personal hell

Scotty wrote: ↑Tue Mar 06, 2018 2:37 pm
DrWilgy wrote: ↑Tue Mar 06, 2018 2:29 pm In other news. I've been stuck as a juror for the past day and a half with this song stuck in my head the entire time.

This is pretty much my own personal hell
lol are you and LoRab at the same trial?

Is it a civil or criminal trial? If civil, im so sorry that’s boring as shit

lol nah.

It's civil. 2 old fuckers arguing. If this continues for the entirety of the 3 days I may break my skull against a wall.

Why did y'all try to kill me while I was in court?

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 08, 2018 12:07 pm I actually don't know why people were voting for Sig.

I know people were voting for Wilgy cause he was being Wilgy.

This brings me to a question. Who was voting me for being me? I'm somewhat unsettled by this.

Jesus fuck. Y'all want Sig dead.

I'm voting Boomslang. Aubergine

Scotty wrote: ↑Tue Mar 13, 2018 2:03 pm
Scotty wrote: ↑Tue Mar 13, 2018 12:40 am
DrWilgy wrote: ↑Tue Mar 13, 2018 12:33 amSup.

So you’ve got nothing to say beside ‘sup’?

I don’t even know why I try.

Not really. Pretty sleepy. Will you cuddle with me Scotty?

Scotty wrote: ↑Wed Mar 14, 2018 12:15 amI am a fantastic cuddler.

But naw

You fuggin tease.

Let's see what happens if I Aubergine Marmot

Scotty wrote: ↑Wed Mar 14, 2018 10:26 am
DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Mar 14, 2018 10:14 am
Scotty wrote: ↑Wed Mar 14, 2018 12:15 amI am a fantastic cuddler.

But naw
You fuggin tease.

Let's see what happens if I Aubergine Marmot
Helpful in lynching Marmot, but not helpful for addressing that I don’t sense a strong sense of agency coming from your decisions in this game. Like, what do you actually think of sig?

He's a waffle and I sense nothing from him other than a taste of tomato.

Blessai blessai

Search found 44 matches