Best flavor I’ve ever read tbh
Search found 346 matches
Return to “Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]”
- Sun Jul 19, 2020 10:17 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37994
- Sun Jul 19, 2020 11:11 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37994
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 0]
- Sun Jul 19, 2020 11:32 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37994
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 0]
I wasn’t actually planning to pay attention to this game until like D3 but are you guys nutso IAAFR is like hard clear
He’s also probably town
Tutu is also pretty town based off the three posts of hers I read
I’m doing it dad I’m doing a mafia
He’s also probably town
Tutu is also pretty town based off the three posts of hers I read
I’m doing it dad I’m doing a mafia
- Mon Jul 20, 2020 12:24 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37994
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 0]
Playing the game is scummy tbh
So are cases
And meta
So are cases
And meta
- Mon Jul 20, 2020 12:36 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37994
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 0]
Thanks for sheeping
Who else would like to sheep my super good reads
Who else would like to sheep my super good reads
- Mon Jul 20, 2020 3:38 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37994
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 0]
I’m your captain now
- Mon Jul 20, 2020 3:43 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37994
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 0]
Three town (IAAFR tutuu radishes) down, too many more to go
- Mon Jul 20, 2020 8:48 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37994
- Mon Jul 20, 2020 9:25 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37994
- Mon Jul 20, 2020 11:59 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37994
- Tue Jul 21, 2020 12:07 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37994
- Tue Jul 21, 2020 12:08 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37994
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 0]
I don't even know what this meansnutella wrote: ↑Tue Jul 21, 2020 12:04 amhot take my dude you have been playing up your nanookness to such a cartoonish extent that i think it's a facade
What is my nanookness???
- Tue Jul 21, 2020 1:06 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37994
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 0]
[mention]nutella[/mention] still waiting for an explanation what this even meansNANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Tue Jul 21, 2020 12:08 amI don't even know what this meansnutella wrote: ↑Tue Jul 21, 2020 12:04 amhot take my dude you have been playing up your nanookness to such a cartoonish extent that i think it's a facade
What is my nanookness???
- Tue Jul 21, 2020 2:17 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37994
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 0]
What are you talking about I have reads and gave themnutella wrote: ↑Tue Jul 21, 2020 2:01 amshould be obvious tbh since youve only done one thing in your posts this game and thats what im referring toNANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Tue Jul 21, 2020 1:06 am@nutella still waiting for an explanation what this even meansNANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Tue Jul 21, 2020 12:08 amI don't even know what this meansnutella wrote: ↑Tue Jul 21, 2020 12:04 amhot take my dude you have been playing up your nanookness to such a cartoonish extent that i think it's a facade
What is my nanookness???
you're playing up your character of not doing shit d1 and yes you have done so a fair bit in recent town games but your tone is different here and so i have a gut read that you're faking/emphasizing it a bit unnaturally
idk it's not a strong read i'm just concerned that you don't feel quite right
I did make the "you're gonna be disappointed" crack but that's not relevant to D1 specifically, I just don't explain my reads much in general.
So yeah I don't really know what the fuck you're talking about, seems like you're just being kinda disparaging for no apparent reason.
- Tue Jul 21, 2020 2:20 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37994
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 0]
I also DO do shit D1, I explicitly believe in catching mafia D1, and, most importantly, I've been doing shit on D1 this game
- Tue Jul 21, 2020 2:25 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37994
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 0]
Help I’m being M I S R E P R E S E N T E D
butterflyisthisamafiatell?.jpg
butterflyisthisamafiatell?.jpg
- Tue Jul 21, 2020 8:58 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37994
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 0]
You’re most likely going to be disappointed by taking a “help me read you” angle with me, sorryBenson wrote: ↑Tue Jul 21, 2020 8:51 amI only remember some vague reads that were a while ago now. Have those changed? Are there new reads? Help me read you.NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Tue Jul 21, 2020 2:20 am I also DO do shit D1, I explicitly believe in catching mafia D1, and, most importantly, I've been doing shit on D1 this game
------------
Not going to quote all your posts before here are my fast thoughts before I go to work.Amy wrote: ↑Tue Jul 21, 2020 4:00 am actually yeah huh nutella never actually makes a post about my slot between saying she buys my defense and dropping me in the PoE. talk to me about myself nut. where am i at for you
also nutella/iaafr never w/w ever, if nutella's a wolf she absolutely TMI'd him v
11/60 remembering to include these is hard but remembering my post total without them is going to be harder
The reaction vote and subsequent analysis is good. It's a genuine play and I think the your conclusions are ostensibly towny. That said, you may be looking too far into what is actually there, but I can't condemn you on that.
Now the reads list: it feels super convenient that your CW ends up as top scum. But I do share suspicions with the quote above, as much as it could easily be a twtbw thing.
Finally the intuition-read: I can't articulate why exactly right - or I'm too lazy too - but almost your entire game feels very crafted and agenda-y, as opposed to something naturally flowing. That's why I'm still on your wagon.
The villager appears to pour itself down, and indeed its villageryness pours in all direction, but the stream does not run out. This pouring is linear extension: that is why its beams are called rays, because they radiate in extended lines
OK I'll stop with the dumb quotes.
Also, the nutella wagon is feeling rather "easy". Like until MR, there was no actual resistance and basically everyone was like "yup nute is scummy". Maybe her teammates are bussers and low-posters but idk.
--------
Ah feck off. You haven't even seen me wolf in a while and the difference is marginal in terms of actual post count. Like it would be something like 90% of my town posting rate and that's not something that would show up in a 60 post-per-phase capped game.Master Radishes wrote: ↑Tue Jul 21, 2020 8:46 amUh, yeah, you post less as a wolf. Sorry to burst that bubble for you. Here, you’re post-capping yourself, and perhaps more specifically your posts are all game-related, which is more what I meant anyway. You’re engaged. I know you hate when I call you the t-word because you never trust me in return, but too bad. Even your handling of me here fits with your town meta.
What is this, CDC?
My reads are tutuu and IAAFR lock town don’t reconsider before f3, radishes not that level but I thought his Captain thing was kinda townie.
In addition I’m now willing to include Amy in my townreads cause I’ve heard through the grapevine (by which I mean her talking about it in jury chat and/or champs spec chat) that she has a not very good scum game.
- Tue Jul 21, 2020 8:58 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37994
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 1]
Those reads aren’t vague btw they’re pretty explicit/clear cut imo
- Tue Jul 21, 2020 9:00 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37994
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 1]
(Although that last one is not a completely serious read, I just want to see how amy plays and thus don’t want to kill her D1)
- Tue Jul 21, 2020 9:17 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37994
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 1]
Idk I think 2 very confident and one semi-confident read is pretty good for where we are/I am.
- Tue Jul 21, 2020 12:58 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37994
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 1]
Here’s a word I hateBenson wrote: ↑Tue Jul 21, 2020 9:23 amNANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Tue Jul 21, 2020 9:17 am Idk I think 2 very confident and one semi-confident read is pretty good for where we are/I am.
Well, I assumed the rabbit read was mostly you meming or something. What do you see so far from him that is worthy of that confidence?
He’s very pure
I’m not going to explain it beyond that but yeah his tone has been super good imo.
- Tue Jul 21, 2020 1:01 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37994
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 0]
....nutella wrote: ↑Tue Jul 21, 2020 12:52 pmNANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Tue Jul 21, 2020 2:20 am I also DO do shit D1, I explicitly believe in catching mafia D1, and, most importantly, I've been doing shit on D1 this gamedude chillNANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Tue Jul 21, 2020 2:25 am Help I’m being M I S R E P R E S E N T E D
butterflyisthisamafiatell?.jpg
yeah you've given reads. I guess more what I'm trying to say is your tone feels fabricated to me. I know that's not a productive thing to defend against but it's there in the back of my head. I said I'm daypassing you anyway, don't get your boxer briefs in a knot.
good post. the long post about the tim reaction test thingy was p good too. amy can be v for nowAmy wrote: ↑Tue Jul 21, 2020 3:52 am Actually, a quick note about rabbit.
I'm not 100% sure how good I am at reading rabbit. Last game I played with him (excluding Anni, which isn't a game) I townread him very early, but largely because I had a very strong PR read on him - one which turned out to be wrong. So I may just be shit at reading him.
That said, I was hoping that his seeming inability to get his volume under control would be an indicator that I'd be able to find him obvtown and move on with my life, but I haven't. I have Concerns.
In essence, I think his reads are stickier than he'd care to admit. I think v!rabbit maybe doesn't bother to explain in so much detail why he swapped from me to nutella to me in the span of 2 minutes. And I'm concerned about the fact that he apparently feels strong enough about my wolfiness that he's willing to start making preflip associatives about it.
I also know for a fact that rabbit hates D1 wallcases, because I made an (incorrect) one in said last game we played together and he didn't let me hear the end of it. It's entirely possible that this is just his way of getting payback, but it still concerns me.
I don't wanna go here today, though. Rabbit is a slot that gets easier and easier to read as the game goes on. We check in around D3 or D4, see if there are still Concerns, and then dunk his ass if the answer is yes. Otherwise he hard clears himself and we all move on with our lives.
inb4 rabbit calls this w/w
Ok fine I’ll give you a day pass for accurately assessing me as a boxer briefs man
[also you may be taking my jokes a bit too seriously methinks]
- Tue Jul 21, 2020 11:22 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37994
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 0]
- Tue Jul 21, 2020 11:23 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37994
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 0]
The Captain stuff was townie idk what to tell youHally wrote: ↑Tue Jul 21, 2020 11:17 pmwow ok so you are wolfingNANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Mon Jul 20, 2020 3:43 am Three town (IAAFR tutuu radishes) down, too many more to go
seriously nanook, there is no way you have a town read on radishes for what he posted up to here
just... no
You literally just saw me townreading people this fast, now you’re scumreading me for...townreading people too fast. Wut.
- Tue Jul 21, 2020 11:30 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37994
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 1]
Omg you agree with 2/3 of my reads then scumread what are you even doing rnHally wrote: ↑Tue Jul 21, 2020 11:29 pm just finished page 4
tutuu seems like obvious town!tutuu to me. she’s just overflowing with towniness in the same way as space invaders
iaafr idk yet even though he posted a fair bit. same with tim
benson i wanna say is town. alison i also wanna say is town even though she is a scary wolf. she seems really towny to me so far though
nanook is actually giving me really wolfy vibes off his first two posts
that’s all that sticks out atm
- Wed Jul 22, 2020 12:21 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37994
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 1]
I live in my own world and you're no longer invitedAlison wrote: ↑Tue Jul 21, 2020 11:34 pm Okay, just read through the Hally catchup. I don't see the shining town spark in her like I usually do when she's town. Hallyrus is probably just wolf. Sorry Hally.
Also nanook, agreeing with someone's reads doesn't mean you have to townread them. Like you can think it's TMI. Or you can agree with the reads but think the way they got there is made up.
Tbf you said this in Jack too then we towncored anyways so maybe there's still hopeHally wrote: ↑Tue Jul 21, 2020 11:35 pmi dont really think it was towny but okNANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Tue Jul 21, 2020 11:23 pmThe Captain stuff was townie idk what to tell youHally wrote: ↑Tue Jul 21, 2020 11:17 pmwow ok so you are wolfingNANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Mon Jul 20, 2020 3:43 am Three town (IAAFR tutuu radishes) down, too many more to go
seriously nanook, there is no way you have a town read on radishes for what he posted up to here
just... no
You literally just saw me townreading people this fast, now you’re scumreading me for...townreading people too fast. Wut.
it’s also just the vibe of your posts seems fake to me. but i’ve only seen like two of them so that may change. tbdddd
no? i agree with your tutuu read so far, that’s all! but you don’t get points for that because tutuu is so obviousNANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Tue Jul 21, 2020 11:30 pmOmg you agree with 2/3 of my reads then scumread what are you even doing rnHally wrote: ↑Tue Jul 21, 2020 11:29 pm just finished page 4
tutuu seems like obvious town!tutuu to me. she’s just overflowing with towniness in the same way as space invaders
iaafr idk yet even though he posted a fair bit. same with tim
benson i wanna say is town. alison i also wanna say is town even though she is a scary wolf. she seems really towny to me so far though
nanook is actually giving me really wolfy vibes off his first two posts
that’s all that sticks out atm
back to reading
Not true! I also respond to positive things said about me.
Yes I thought his captain interaction with me was townie. I don't think scumRadishes is that uh...idk the right word, blatant I guess? It's admittedly not as strong as my Rabbit and Tutuu reads.
- Wed Jul 22, 2020 12:24 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37994
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 1]
Fwiw I'm always slightly offended/bewildered at being scumreadTimsup2nothin wrote: ↑Tue Jul 21, 2020 11:42 pm @Allison
Is straight to "how dare you"/OMGUS/AtE the usual way for v!Nanook to deal with suss? Because this looks a lot like how he pushed off suss from Nutella earlier.
I'm kinda torn because at the time Nutella was top wagon and here we are with Hally top wagon...and both look around and say "hey how about Nanook?" But it isn't like they are making a big reach to suss Nanook I don't think. His reaction isn't really jiving to me, but I don't know him.
@nutella is this as familiar as I'm thinking it looks?
- Wed Jul 22, 2020 12:32 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37994
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 1]
That they're wrong and should feel bad about it, mostlyTimsup2nothin wrote: ↑Wed Jul 22, 2020 12:28 amThis is not a good combination with somewhat scummy thread presence. You give a smattering of very early (meaning of dubious quality) reads and then mostly peace out until someone calls you on having done very little as if they are wrong? What's the thinking behind this?NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Wed Jul 22, 2020 12:24 amFwiw I'm always slightly offended/bewildered at being scumreadTimsup2nothin wrote: ↑Tue Jul 21, 2020 11:42 pm @Allison
Is straight to "how dare you"/OMGUS/AtE the usual way for v!Nanook to deal with suss? Because this looks a lot like how he pushed off suss from Nutella earlier.
I'm kinda torn because at the time Nutella was top wagon and here we are with Hally top wagon...and both look around and say "hey how about Nanook?" But it isn't like they are making a big reach to suss Nanook I don't think. His reaction isn't really jiving to me, but I don't know him.
@nutella is this as familiar as I'm thinking it looks?
Fwiw I'm also much more tongue in cheek than some people are aware of
Also I do actually think my reads are pretty solid, especially the fluffy and tutu reads. I pretty firmly believe in the power of early correct reads.
- Wed Jul 22, 2020 12:34 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37994
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 1]
Basically I'm saying you should take my three reads seriously, and almost everything else I say as at least partially tongue in cheek.
- Wed Jul 22, 2020 12:34 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37994
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 1]
I don't need to make enhancements they're good reads lol
- Wed Jul 22, 2020 12:40 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37994
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 1]
I believe it's 3/3 though, which is significantly above rand!Timsup2nothin wrote: ↑Wed Jul 22, 2020 12:38 amWell, since I agree solidly with two out of three we could say that I am "taking them seriously." We can even say that I believe shooting two out of three on having your snap reads turn out consensus agreeable is a pretty good record. I just don't see it as laurels meriting being rested on. Two out of three snap read villagers turning out good isn't even rand.NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Wed Jul 22, 2020 12:34 am Basically I'm saying you should take my three reads seriously, and almost everything else I say as at least partially tongue in cheek.
I'm gonna start using smileys now or trying to cause I forget sometimes that people who aren't used to me and nutella can't usually recognize when I'm not being entirely serious
I'll let you know when I have more reads, those are the three I have high confidence in.
- Wed Jul 22, 2020 12:49 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37994
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 1]
People that can’t recognize my sarcasm:Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Jul 22, 2020 12:48 amI'm gonna start using smileys now, or trying to, cause I forget sometimes that people who aren't used to [me and nutella] can't usually recognize when I'm not being entirely seriousNANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Wed Jul 22, 2020 12:40 amI'm gonna start using smileys now or trying to cause I forget sometimes that people who aren't used to me and nutella can't usually recognize when I'm not being entirely serious
I'm gonna start using smileys now, or trying to, cause I forget sometimes that people who aren't used to me, and nutella can't usually recognize when I'm not being entirely serious
I don't totally know how to read this sentence.
[people who aren’t used to me] [nutella]
That clear things up?
- Wed Jul 22, 2020 1:04 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37994
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 1]
Dude you say “my read of you is not due to not getting humor or anything” and then immediately proceed to miss the humornutella wrote: ↑Wed Jul 22, 2020 1:00 ammy dude I can tell when you're jokey or whatever cause you usually are, my read of you is not due to not getting humor or anything it's more that it felt like you were playing it up more than usualNANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Wed Jul 22, 2020 12:40 amI believe it's 3/3 though, which is significantly above rand!Timsup2nothin wrote: ↑Wed Jul 22, 2020 12:38 amWell, since I agree solidly with two out of three we could say that I am "taking them seriously." We can even say that I believe shooting two out of three on having your snap reads turn out consensus agreeable is a pretty good record. I just don't see it as laurels meriting being rested on. Two out of three snap read villagers turning out good isn't even rand.NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Wed Jul 22, 2020 12:34 am Basically I'm saying you should take my three reads seriously, and almost everything else I say as at least partially tongue in cheek.
I'm gonna start using smileys now or trying to cause I forget sometimes that people who aren't used to me and nutella can't usually recognize when I'm not being entirely serious
I'll let you know when I have more reads, those are the three I have high confidence in.
giving him a daypass. I think he's decently enough in his town meta to let him develop, just have vague tonal reservationsHally wrote: ↑Wed Jul 22, 2020 12:45 am also @nutella in your reads list earlier you had nanook as “won’t chop today” which presumably meant you te him? but in your post that i just quoted you find him wolfy so i’m wondering like, why was he placed so high initially and what changed?
ignore this if you’ve addressed it already, i’m still living in the past
Bravo 7/7 ezclap
Ppe: yes you of all people, you regularly take me seriously when I’m not being serious!
- Wed Jul 22, 2020 2:53 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37994
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 1]
Last game was a bit of an outlier for me tbh, I was experimenting with something/the specific circumstances of that game led to a lot of involvement early on. I’m typically more of a navigator than a driver. I’m also somewhat experimenting with only putting out reads in actually high confidence in, something I do periodically. Do with that what you will.Hally wrote: ↑Wed Jul 22, 2020 2:43 amnanook definitely did a lot more earlier on last game than he has here. he was town cored pretty quickly and became a leading voice/the n1 kill. here he’s honestly kind of a nonentity despite his claims that he’s doing stuff. he’s hardly done anything imo. but idk if this is a good way to read him because i think he’s a competent wolf and it’s not like he can’t post. so maybe he just doesn’t feel he has to, which ig is not AI really but still meh. i’m not town reading himBenson wrote: ↑Wed Jul 22, 2020 12:04 amI agree.Timsup2nothin wrote: ↑Tue Jul 21, 2020 11:57 pmThis is wolf lurkiness and vastly different than my read on LC. LC posts when he posts without regard to whether he "needs" to or not, and his posts refer back to context deep in the thread. It isn't this "snap to action OMGUS" on things that are just happening at the moment.
Hally is about one good post away from me switching my vote here.
At the same time, Nanook is so blatantly lurking and not caring that I question why he'd deploy this strategy as a wolf. Unless this is just something he always does and he thinks he can get away with it?
In response to your next post after this, idk yet. Ask me again tomorrow afternoon EDT.
- Wed Jul 22, 2020 2:56 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37994
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 1]
Idk why you’d expect my reads to change when i explicitly think they’re good reads? I don’t really believe in “developing” reads I’m happy with just for the sake of looking like I’m doing something. This probably shouldn’t come as a surprise kekHally wrote: ↑Wed Jul 22, 2020 2:51 ami hate to like... offend you or anything but the fact that you still only have three reads and that they’re the same exact reads you had on like page 4 is like... not greatNANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Wed Jul 22, 2020 12:34 am Basically I'm saying you should take my three reads seriously, and almost everything else I say as at least partially tongue in cheek.
your reads haven’t developed at all since then? any wolf reads? any more tr’s? like... what’s going on with you. your posts lately are all just getting annoyed at ppl sussing you but you’re not solving really so idk what to tell you
I only have three relatively high confidence reads so those are the reads ive put out. I’m going to make reads on my own time, sorry not sorry. I’m pretty busy so this is the version of nanook you’re getting
- Wed Jul 22, 2020 2:59 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37994
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 1]
I could make some reads up but I don’t think it’ll be productive this game given my available time/energy to spend on this
- Wed Jul 22, 2020 3:06 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37994
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 1]
Like real talk I’m mostly just here to have fun and make some snap reads
If you wanna kill me for not having more reads ok whatever, see how well that goes for you lol
Most likely I’ll find scum tomorrow afternoon, everyone will likely ignore it tho even tho I have an insanely high early hit rate on syndicate
That’s how this goes most of the time, and I don’t have jay here to fight my battles for me and wrangle people lol
Anyways I’m likely not going to spend more time on this? When I have more confident reads I’ll let you know. Until then I don’t think more discussion of my playstyle is going to be particularly useful and I’m kinda bored with it lulz
If you wanna kill me for not having more reads ok whatever, see how well that goes for you lol
Most likely I’ll find scum tomorrow afternoon, everyone will likely ignore it tho even tho I have an insanely high early hit rate on syndicate
That’s how this goes most of the time, and I don’t have jay here to fight my battles for me and wrangle people lol
Anyways I’m likely not going to spend more time on this? When I have more confident reads I’ll let you know. Until then I don’t think more discussion of my playstyle is going to be particularly useful and I’m kinda bored with it lulz
- Wed Jul 22, 2020 3:25 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37994
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 1]
A) I didn’t OMGUS anyone or really do AtE? I mostly made jokesTimsup2nothin wrote: ↑Wed Jul 22, 2020 3:16 am Well, this is gonna leave me with ten posts so a good time to clock out.
Vote off of Hally is something I wanna do. Leaving the lower sections of my list without a really superior reason is not something I am gonna do.
Don't wanna just follow on because there's enough excitement around Radishes anyway. In fact might well opt in for chopping you tomorrow Master Radishes, so don't be surprised.
But right now I'm curious. If the instant OMGUS AtE response is routine for a mild scum lean, what happens if I [VOTE: Nanook] aubergine
B) meh, you’re not gonna kill me today
- Wed Jul 22, 2020 3:43 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37994
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 1]
[mention]Timsup2nothin[/mention] I can't believe I briefly forgot the most important part of my "rebuttal"NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Wed Jul 22, 2020 3:25 amA) I didn’t OMGUS anyone or really do AtE? I mostly made jokesTimsup2nothin wrote: ↑Wed Jul 22, 2020 3:16 am Well, this is gonna leave me with ten posts so a good time to clock out.
Vote off of Hally is something I wanna do. Leaving the lower sections of my list without a really superior reason is not something I am gonna do.
Don't wanna just follow on because there's enough excitement around Radishes anyway. In fact might well opt in for chopping you tomorrow Master Radishes, so don't be surprised.
But right now I'm curious. If the instant OMGUS AtE response is routine for a mild scum lean, what happens if I [VOTE: Nanook] aubergine
B) meh, you’re not gonna kill me today
- Wed Jul 22, 2020 3:44 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37994
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 1]
Btw I think I have another confident read and it's that Hally is frankly exhausting but also town
But disclaimer that it's 3:45am so idk if I'm going to lock that read in yet or not
But disclaimer that it's 3:45am so idk if I'm going to lock that read in yet or not
- Wed Jul 22, 2020 10:59 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37994
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 1]
A) you’re not gonna kill me todaycolonialbob wrote: ↑Wed Jul 22, 2020 10:32 am Reading the last few pages led me to ISO Nanook and all I see is some early "reads" followed by a bunch of nothing until he started getting pressure, at which point there was finally another piece of game-relevant info. So [VOTE: nanook] aubergine
B) they’re not “reads” they’re Nanook Certified Locks
- Wed Jul 22, 2020 11:41 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37994
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 1]
Oh my god I’m softing a useful (and provable!) role
- Wed Jul 22, 2020 1:08 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37994
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 1]
I don’t think that was called for, I don’t remember saying “you should treat me with respect cause I’m a Very Important Player” or whatever. Certainly wasn’t my intent to give that impression anyways. Idk why this, like, condescending while at the same time painting me as condescending tone is called for, tbh?Timsup2nothin wrote: ↑Wed Jul 22, 2020 12:34 pmI push on mafia looking posts and events. Most of those are gonna come from town. That's the nature of day one. I'm not trying to kill Proto. I'm not really trying to kill Nanook even though I put a vote on him. This is all just stirring the day one pot and looking at what is floating around.tutuu wrote: ↑Wed Jul 22, 2020 12:13 pm yes u did call him mafia wtf tim lol
radish, i think nanook's soft was "let me live for a couple of days" or something of the sort
i mean he was town regardless, stop bothering him lol
also i think radish is town for making post 778 in the public thread and not in wolf chat
tim, i think u are pushing 2 town. nanook and proto. i might be wrong on my reads in which case i apologize, but i also might be wrong on my reads in the sense that i might have wrongly townread u
I am a solver sometimes, but never an instant solver. I actually count more on stronger readers than myself to analyze all this stuff. I just man the oar and keep the pot stirred, mostly.
No need to apologize for making reads. If they are wrong they are wrong, but no one bats a thousand...even if Nanook is claiming that he does.
@Master Radishes in some cultures "you aren't killing me today" is "secret code" for "I have a claim to make that will stop you." To me it is about the dumbest 'soft' there is, and I absolutely hate softs of every stripe. The wolves always see the soft, so the only thing accomplished by softing rather than just claiming is that some, most, or all of the town will be confused. The "you aren't killing me" soft is the worst because it does get treated by some players as if it were some sort of wink and nod secret that only "the elite" players who just never rand wolf think they know about.
@Benson I acknowledge your point and no I am no more interested in chopping him than I was in chopping Amy, and do not really expect that it will be happening.
@NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME I apologize for failing to treat you with the assumed respect that you think you have earned in previous play. I am just a rube from the hinterlands and unaware of the history and traditions of your little pond here. I have however played with Visorslash, Amrock, Pizza, Zack, and a fair number of other players of substantial reputation and have been insufficiently respectful towards all of them as well, so you are in good company.
- Wed Jul 22, 2020 1:43 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37994
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 1]
You said my name twice so I only assume it’s because you really love me and admire the way I play
7/7
7/7
- Wed Jul 22, 2020 5:49 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37994
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 1]
There’s a significantly above rand chance KZA is mafia.
Sheep me for the glory.
Sheep me for the glory.
- Wed Jul 22, 2020 5:51 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37994
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 1]
[mention]Hally[/mention] this is the scumread I told you I’d have later btwNANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Wed Jul 22, 2020 5:49 pm There’s a significantly above rand chance KZA is mafia.
Sheep me for the glory.
Come sheep it plz
- Wed Jul 22, 2020 5:52 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37994
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 1]
WOW look at that timing I call him scum and he appears.
Am I a magician?
A sorcerer?
A practitioner of the dark arts?
Maybe he’s just a very antsy beetlejuice.
Am I a magician?
A sorcerer?
A practitioner of the dark arts?
Maybe he’s just a very antsy beetlejuice.
- Wed Jul 22, 2020 5:53 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37994
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 1]
Btw I have zero idea why Amy is voting for KZA but I’m going to blindly say she’s somewhat >rand town for being there rn.
I reserve the right to change my mind once I’ve actually read why she’s there kek
I reserve the right to change my mind once I’ve actually read why she’s there kek
- Wed Jul 22, 2020 5:57 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37994
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 1]
I mean no that was just a joke, it’s not why he’s scum lol
Glance at his pyre mafia ISO and that’ll give you an idea probably
48WerewolfHunter wrote: ↑Wed Jul 22, 2020 5:55 pm [quote=NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME post_id=638720 time=<a href="tel:1595454723">1595454723</a> user_id=665]
WOW look at that timing I call him scum and he appears.
Am I a magician?
A sorcerer?
A practitioner of the dark arts?
Maybe he’s just a very antsy beetlejuice.
Why not use one post to say that i love this post
[/quote]
Thanks boo ily2
- Wed Jul 22, 2020 7:07 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37994
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 1]
Master Radishes wrote: ↑Wed Jul 22, 2020 6:19 pmWoah. Um. Let me rescind my v read on Nook.NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Wed Jul 22, 2020 5:49 pm There’s a significantly above rand chance KZA is mafia.
Sheep me for the glory.
Spicy take: this is w/w. Or maybe it's w/v with Nook as the wolf and trying to protect one of the wagons. Like something about the wording of this pings me.
Hey guys I think I found a teammate
[we’re going to pretend I never had a townread on him mmkay]