The Syndicate

Yahoo! Hello game! It’s been a year.

First thing’s first, how do I vote with this new voting tag system that I just read about in the rules?

Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2018 11:08 pm Colonialbob's foretold role reveal suggests some significant event will occur on Day 6, perhaps. Something to be mindful of.

I did not play in Survivor mafia and do not know what the tribe mechanics were like for that game. Can someone fill us in on those details? Perhaps @Scotty wants to say hi and talk about this.

Yo.

Yeah, I mean for starters, it’s pretty straightforward. Survivor also shared a similar mechanic with Lost Again 3 (I believe that was 2017) which had peeps on a beach and in the hatch. The hatch exploded after a few days if I recall. And didn’t Golden also host that? Might be something similar.

@Sloonei you mentioned that you were a button that created chaos and changed around roles, but I’m not so sure the same thing would be applied here. It might have some other function. It might even merge tribes. Who really knows. But I like to poke burning logs with my finger like an idiot so I’m not one to make a decision there.

Kylemii wrote: ↑Sat Feb 24, 2018 2:56 am

Scotty wrote: ↑Sat Feb 24, 2018 2:39 am Yahoo! Hello game! It’s been a year.

First thing’s first, how do I vote with this new voting tag system that I just read about in the rules?

[ vote ]vote[/ vote ]
[VOTE: vote] aubergine

there's also a "vote" button up in the thing

Oh sweet! That’s a cool addition- thanks man! Nice to meet you as well!

Also I just looked it up and I’m thinking of Lost Season 2 played in 2016, so ignore about the hatch blowing up bit.

The tribes thing should be straight forward in any case- it should merge when a certain amount of people are eliminated in each.

The difference between this and my game is the addition of a mafia team. Mine was just a LMS type of deal. If I were Golden, I would split mafia evenly between tribes. Or as evenly as I could. In a 23 person game, I don’t know what would be a comparable ratio. Also considering there might be a few indies in the mix, there’s probably at least 2 baddies in each tribe.

Kylemii wrote: ↑Sat Feb 24, 2018 1:27 am

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Sat Feb 24, 2018 1:19 am

Kylemii wrote: ↑Sat Feb 24, 2018 1:15 am are there any other game setups that seem to be referenced here? it seems like at the very least we have Chicka Chicka with The Button and reviving into different roles and apparently survivor with the tribes?

The idea for the GOC’s is that literally every game from last year is welded together into a giant monstrosity. Expect a whole lotta game references.

that's beautiful.

was there any other weird shit that happened this year that I should be aware of? I missed out on about 9 months of it

Yeah I haven’t even been on since i took a breather in May (or was it June idk). I could read through all the old threads but I don’t have the time for that unfortunately.


We see Tina Wesson who was the doctor role in Survivor, doing a similar job here but against a virus. That’s new. I also wouldn’t be surprised if her opposite is a mafia member and randomly placed on the other tribe. There has to be some sort of randomness here with roles that counterbalance each other.

Wait how would we even push the button? Is that something we can decide as a group to push or is it at the discretion of the actual Giant Anonymous Talking Button (tm)?

Hey HOSTS

If the player with the most votes is also “immune” to a lynch, does that result in a no-lynch or the next-highest voter being lynched instead?

And if there are ties in a normal lynch, same question.

kthnxbye!

Love,

Montgomery.

juliets wrote: ↑Sat Feb 24, 2018 7:24 am

Golden wrote: ↑Sat Feb 24, 2018 3:38 am

Scotty wrote: ↑Sat Feb 24, 2018 3:17 amIf the player with the most votes is also “immune” to a lynch, does that result in a no-lynch or the next-highest voter being lynched instead?

Scotty wrote: ↑Sat Feb 24, 2018 3:17 amAnd if there are ties in a normal lynch, same question.

I don't understand what you are asking here.

Scotty, the answer to your question is

I should have expected the shrug of doom I guess

Marmot wrote: ↑Sat Feb 24, 2018 12:27 pm Before I forget.

[VOTE: Marmot] aubergine

Ya know, one day you’re gonna forget to switch your vote, MM.

also hey MM Opt and I went backpacking in the Sierras for a month and we saw lots of you. Fat little guys, trying to always steal our food. always thought of you when we saw one not because of the fat thing but...you know....the name

sig wrote: ↑Sat Feb 24, 2018 9:25 am

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Sat Feb 24, 2018 12:27 am One thing that I'm worried about is the whole Haiku protection thing. Unfortunately, we don't know who did or did not send in a haiku, and people have an incentive to lie about doing so in order to protect themselves.

This could potentially lead to an even more lackadaisical and pointless Day 1 than usual, where not only does everyone not know who the hell is scum, but we also don't even know who we can actually lynch.

I don't think it would be info dumping to say who did a haiku? While people could lie about it I don't think many would so we could consider saying if we did.

Did you submit a haiku, sig? Or noku?

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Feb 24, 2018 2:06 pm [VOTE: Scotty] aubergine

Because I missed playing with him.

Thanks man! Can I get you anything while I’m up? Bud? Bud Light? Miller High Life?

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Feb 24, 2018 4:31 pm

Scotty wrote: ↑Sat Feb 24, 2018 3:44 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Feb 24, 2018 2:06 pm [VOTE: Scotty] aubergine

Because I missed playing with him.

Thanks man! Can I get you anything while I’m up? Bud? Bud Light? Miller High Life?

I'll take a read on a player if you've got any.

Seriously? Half the peeps haven’t even checked in. You know how my day one goes, Sloon.

But now that you asked me I was thinking that it was funny that INH hadn’t checked in since he’s been pretty active elsewhere and then I looked and saw that he’s been active in the beginning of this game and I totally forgot he even posted.

So of the people that have done anything thus far, he’s got my interest. Labeling him as blendy.

But I’m probably not gonna vote for him. Because it’s day 1

Yeah I dunno if INH is bad. He seems pretty pissed to get heat this early. I mean plus, I’ve basically only given mechanical suggestions in the game too, so I can’t exactly fault INH for that.

Sloonei, are you bad? Just looking to “get the game going” by agreeing with my initial read of INH?

In other news, I think jackofhearts is the only one not to check in yet. I know he’s hosting a game right now- I now know just how time consuming that is.

But I’m gonna vote for him right now to have a placeholder vote.

If he comes in, I’ll look to change it depending.

[VOTE: jackofhearts] aubergine

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 12:39 pm

Scotty wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 1:06 am In other news, I think jackofhearts is the only one not to check in yet. I know he’s hosting a game right now- I now know just how time consuming that is.

But I’m gonna vote for him right now to have a placeholder vote.

If he comes in, I’ll look to change it depending.

[VOTE: jackofhearts] aubergine

This is in line with what I remember of Scotty's meta. He votes for the closest thing he can find to an absentee on Day 1. Scum scotty could easily get by by replicating his ancient meta on his return to game action. It's an easy thing to do.

Meta aside, I have no idea what you actually think about me, as witnessed by your “yellow” on the rainbow list. -5 points to Hufflepuff.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 12:46 pm A strong, definitive rainbow list:

Sloonei
Kylemii
DrWilgy
LoRab
Spacedaisy
Jackofhearts2005
Scotty
Boomslang
nijuukyugou
Marmot
sig
insertnamehere

Why is Kyle a definitive green for you? I don’t remember you talking about him before.

I’m sorry, I’m not really a yellow, just a sort of bilish leaf color.

sig wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 2:02 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 1:54 pm

sig wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 1:52 pm I do like that Sloonie is posting and trying to get people talking, but as of right now I just don't think there's much to talk about. However, I'd put him down as a light civ read.

Got any non-civ reads?

Nope not yet.

I would fathom to say that I feel like @sig now looks more blendy and shruggy than INH.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 2:42 pm

Scotty wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 2:39 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 12:39 pm

Scotty wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 1:06 am In other news, I think jackofhearts is the only one not to check in yet. I know he’s hosting a game right now- I now know just how time consuming that is.

But I’m gonna vote for him right now to have a placeholder vote.

If he comes in, I’ll look to change it depending.

[VOTE: jackofhearts] aubergine

This is in line with what I remember of Scotty's meta. He votes for the closest thing he can find to an absentee on Day 1. Scum scotty could easily get by by replicating his ancient meta on his return to game action. It's an easy thing to do.

Meta aside, I have no idea what you actually think about me, as witnessed by your “yellow” on the rainbow list. -5 points to Hufflepuff.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 12:46 pm A strong, definitive rainbow list:

Sloonei
Kylemii
DrWilgy
LoRab
Spacedaisy
Jackofhearts2005
Scotty
Boomslang
nijuukyugou
Marmot
sig
insertnamehere

Why is Kyle a definitive green for you? I don’t remember you talking about him before.

You are light green. Not yellow. Slight town read.

Kyle is my strongest town read because his handful of posts reflect kyle's trademark contemplative attitude.

So you’re saying he is exhibiting his meta and that’s trustworthy. But so am I? Why am I not forest green? I like the forest.

Sorry, not forest green, more like eco-friendly bioflourescent green

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 2:53 pm Because your meta reflection is only constituted in a vote that you cast, whereas Kyle's is manifested in the tone of his posts. So far.

I’ll show you a tone.

Get off my lawn!!

How’s that?

If I were the button, I would have pressed it when I logged in.


Maybe jack is the button?

Day ends in like 2 hours.

I like my vote for jack.

Ok well. That non-lynch non-accomplished anything.

Hi jack. Why were you quiet the entire last 48 hours? any particular reason?

Assuming our votes were too spread out if they’re going the “majority gets lynched” between us, I feel like I see how Golden is exercising this game with a taste of a Survivor mechanic, where one tribe essentially went to Tribal Council while the other didn’t. It wouldn’t surprise me if this mechanic was taken out tomorrow, but I also am assuming it won’t. I have a gut feeling it will continue as such, and if our votes are spread out again tomorrow, I feel like once again the other side might overvote us. With that group of people, it seems likely they’ll plop votes on one person. Wonder how many votes Quin got and why..

Boomslang wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 6:25 pm Running out of time. Sig hasn't changed his self-vote and hasn't explained that cryptic 70% comment. Although he hasn't shown up, Jack also isn't creating confusion in thread. So voting sig. [VOTE: Sig] aubergine

This seems like a lazy vote.

I mean, my voting for jack is a lazy vote too, not gonna lie.

But this also seems like Boom picked at a random reason to lynch someone, jumped on the dog wagon and take the train to destinationville.

Yea, dog made a cryptic comment, but it’s sig after all!

I dunno, man. No me gusta

[mention]Jackofhearts2005[/mention] I like the cut of your jib. Hope you caught lots of shiny dratinis yesterday.
What do you think of Sloonei?

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:47 am Your turn. Why did you want to lynch the button? What do you think of INH?

Are you the button? Is lynching the button the easy to activate it? Wouldn’t be my fault if you hadn’t even checked in and in doing so created a gigantic explosion, mate.

I think INH is back in the middle ground for me. He blended in, got defensive and made sense in his defensiveness (day 1). And then hasn’t done any more digging since. I expect more out of him tomorrow?

Kylemii wrote: ↑Mon Feb 26, 2018 2:30 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 6:51 pmSo we appear to be sharing a lynch with the other tribe and they wanted to lynch Quin. I declare this a bad decision on their part.

bad decision why?

Cuz they’re scum buddies

#smokinggun

Hmm that makes me wonder...if the mafia team (assuming there’s only one) is split, do we think they can communicate with the other tribe? My gut actually says no.

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Mon Feb 26, 2018 3:18 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Feb 26, 2018 3:00 pm

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Mon Feb 26, 2018 2:39 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Feb 24, 2018 1:00 am

Kylemii wrote: ↑Sat Feb 24, 2018 12:54 am though the two roles thing will probably extend things anyways so maybe that's realistic?

Another possibility that crossed my mind is that, as players die, they will either change trbes or be sent to the "main" game thread.

But this is why I askes about tribal mechanics in Survivor Mafia. I didn't play in the game and don't feel like looking it up, so I'm hoping someone who was there can explain it to me. Scotty was the game's host, I believe.

Why?

What a fun game we have going on. Sloonei, why exactly did you hop on INH at the start of this game?

I don't understand what you're asking about in the first question.

I went after INH to start the game because he was here and he was somebody that would respond to me and who others could potentially talk about as well.

Sorry...

More so, what would have pondering the reult of death and tribal gameplay lead you to?

And that was your sole reasoning for INH?

Just would like to point out that Sloon didn’t even mention INH as a suspect until I threw his name out as someone that looked blendy. Whether or not he actually agreed with lynch perception beforehand is WIFOM.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Feb 26, 2018 3:27 pm

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Mon Feb 26, 2018 3:18 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Feb 26, 2018 3:00 pm

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Mon Feb 26, 2018 2:39 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Feb 24, 2018 1:00 am

Kylemii wrote: ↑Sat Feb 24, 2018 12:54 am though the two roles thing will probably extend things anyways so maybe that's realistic?

Another possibility that crossed my mind is that, as players die, they will either change trbes or be sent to the "main" game thread.

But this is why I askes about tribal mechanics in Survivor Mafia. I didn't play in the game and don't feel like looking it up, so I'm hoping someone who was there can explain it to me. Scotty was the game's host, I believe.

Why?

What a fun game we have going on. Sloonei, why exactly did you hop on INH at the start of this game?

I don't understand what you're asking about in the first question.

I went after INH to start the game because he was here and he was somebody that would respond to me and who others could potentially talk about as well.

Sorry...

More so, what would have pondering the reult of death and tribal gameplay lead you to?

And that was your sole reasoning for INH?

A broader understanding of the factors and mechanics that could be involved in this game.

Again, I picked INH because he was there. He had provided content which could be discussed. There was very little of that. I wanted to create more of it, so I talked about a player who could be talked about. There was nothing special about it. It's what I do in every game.

Sorry to keep picking on you man, but you’re providing content which can be discussed.

That’s the second time you’ve injected the idea that “this is he [you] always play”. I don’t know your meta but it sounds like you want us to remember yours..

Rip ninja and...welcome...back...ninja?

I’m confused.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 26, 2018 10:43 pm Wife has it too now. I’m at about 80%

yikes man. Feel better Ima go wash my hands. Matter o fact, I think it’s time for my weekly Clorox wipe of my phone and apartment.

I also don’t think Boom would target ninja N1.

That doesn’t mean, however, that his teammate wouldn’t.

OH

IDIOT = ME

ninja’s in her 2nd role. Gotcha.

Guess that solves one of Sloonei’s theories that they get absorbed into a separate thread.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 26, 2018 6:33 pm What do you think about INH going after an "inactive" so soon after fumbling the ball in Fellowship by being confirmed town but leading no lynches and in fact not even voting at MYLO? (I fumbled too but not for lack of trying to move the ball.)

I guess this was directed at me?
I don’t know anything about the Fellowship game so I don’t feel fully qualified to exact a label on INH’s gameplay this time, but at the time I didn’t see anything wrong with his voting an inactive. I genuinely believe voting out inactives in Day 1 is productive. Many would argue otherwise that there is still ample opportunity to find a baddie then but then they must be Sherlock Holmes to my Kim Kardashian. I like votes to analyze. Seeing as we still don’t know anything except the mafia wanted to kill ninja, I feel like we’re in a similar place.

So you’re saying in a previous game INH was basically the Cleveland Browns all game and then pulled a Butterfinger Brady in the Super Bowl? Doesn’t necessarily mean he’ll be more gung-ho or change his game this time around either. It’s just a bit presumptuous to assume that, since I don’t know what kind of constraint he has outside the game.

Tl;dr I don’t think INH looks more suspicious for going after you, an inactive in Day 1 even if he was essentially one previously.

Hey [mention]Marmot[/mention] instead of voting yourself and forgetting to move it again, who would you have voted for day 1 if you *had been around and who are you suspicious of this day?

I would also remind that if we actually want to lynch someone this go round, we’ll probably need agreement and lots of votes on one person to beat out the other tribe.

Any volunteers?

Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2018 12:06 pm

Scotty wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2018 11:59 am I would also remind that if we actually want to lynch someone this go round, we’ll probably need agreement and lots of votes on one person to beat out the other tribe.

Any volunteers?

Place a vote on somebody and talk about it.

K.

Vote Marmot AUBERGINE.

RE: my current vote for Marmot.

He stole an entire bag of granola from me backpacking a few months ago. And I never forgave him.

Here he is in the act:

But more seriously, why not vote for him? I mean, he’s doing it after all.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2018 1:29 pm

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2018 1:09 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2018 12:58 pm Why are you not voting for insertnamehere?

He's talked a lot about suspecting you, relativelt speaking, but has avoided casting a vote for you. That's a bit jarring to me.

What are your thoughts on anything?

Did I give the impression that I suspected INH? Especially given my response to JoH, I’m not sure where you came to that conclusion. I’ve thrown more shade your way than INH, m8

I like that Boom isn’t necessarily coming out and NO Uing Sloonei for the vote on him.

There’s actually a bunch of blendy players as of now, including LoRab for sure, which is something to catalogue for later. Aside from the blooper kill, we still don’t know shit from the D1 lynch. I dont mind LoRab bringing up the prospects of couples killing each other because I wasn’t thinking of that possibility as well.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2018 1:57 pm

Scotty wrote: ↑Sat Feb 24, 2018 5:27 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Feb 24, 2018 4:31 pm

Scotty wrote: ↑Sat Feb 24, 2018 3:44 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Feb 24, 2018 2:06 pm [VOTE: Scotty] aubergine

Because I missed playing with him.

Thanks man! Can I get you anything while I’m up? Bud? Bud Light? Miller High Life?

I'll take a read on a player if you've got any.

Seriously? Half the peeps haven’t even checked in. You know how my day one goes, Sloon.

But now that you asked me I was thinking that it was funny that INH hadn’t checked in since he’s been pretty active elsewhere and then I looked and saw that he’s been active in the beginning of this game and I totally forgot he even posted.

So of the people that have done anything thus far, he’s got my interest. Labeling him as blendy.

But I’m probably not gonna vote for him. Because it’s day 1

Scotty wrote: ↑Mon Feb 26, 2018 10:30 am

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:47 am Your turn. Why did you want to lynch the button? What do you think of INH?

Are you the button? Is lynching the button the easy to activate it? Wouldn’t be my fault if you hadn’t even checked in and in doing so created a gigantic explosion, mate.

I think INH is back in the middle ground for me. He blended in, got defensive and made sense in his defensiveness (day 1). And then hasn’t done any more digging since. I expect more out of him tomorrow?

These posts are where I get the impression that you could cast a vote for INH, Scotty. These two posts are the only instances I see of you doing anything close to "throwing shade" at me, and I don't take them seriously because they are very far off the mark of my actual mindset in this game. I appreciate the skepticism, though. Could you tell me why this would hypothetically make me a good suspect? Does scum Sloonei need another player to put down a lukewarm read of a player before he states a case against them?

Why I would vote INH:
-he’s been blendy, and hasn’t actually offered reads yesterday or today. Especially today.

Why I’m currently not voting INH:
-he seemed genuinely peeved of your suspicion of him in D1. I happened to read that genuine behavior as civ-minded.
-there’s not too much to be talked about yet, aside from the NK.
-it might Ben hard to get his points across today seeing as it appears he’s insanified


Why I would vote for you:
-It appeared opportunistic to jump on a name that I put out in D1. Makes me wonder if you would have agreed with me if I had originally said Marmot looked blendy. We’ll never know.
-I feel like you’re trying to frame my way of thinking to vote INH, and I don’t take well to that

Why I’m not currently voting for you:
-you’re the highest poster and are actually contributing to the discussion. I don’t know yet if what’s you’re saying is manipulative or genuinely a fact-finding mission.
-You’re not technically ‘steering’ the thread by leading us to any one name. You’re actively pressing people on their opinions of things.


Why Marmot over INH?
He’s blendy, has added nothing worthwhile to the discussion and has self voted now twice. Also he has no game-mechanic-induced penalty to talk.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2018 2:32 pm I still would like to know why you (and wilgy) think it would be suspicious of me to follow your comments about INH with my own suspicion of him. Even if that was what I did, I would not view it as a good scum strategy, so I don't know why the angle should be pursued.

I think It’s the coincidence of it, claiming it was an independent thought

“Blendy” could also be a great strategy for a civ that I never seem to employ in early games (one day maybe I’ll learn), as a meddlesome talker could be seen as a threat to the mafia and be bumstickeroonied

Marmot wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2018 2:38 pm

Scotty wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2018 2:27 pm He’s blendy, has added nothing worthwhile to the discussion and has self voted now twice. Also he has no game-mechanic-induced penalty to talk.

Where I came from, being unavailable =/= blendy.

Also, did someone claim that I have a game-mechanic-induced penalty to talk?

I was referring to INH’s apparent insanity this phase. You don’t seem to have anything like that afaik.

Hi MM! I get not being unavailable, but even in your post just now, you’re not offering anything new. It seems like you’re at least reading the thread.

Who would you look to vote for this phase if not yourself?

Marmot wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2018 2:48 pm

Scotty wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2018 2:42 pm

Marmot wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2018 2:38 pm

Scotty wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2018 2:27 pm He’s blendy, has added nothing worthwhile to the discussion and has self voted now twice. Also he has no game-mechanic-induced penalty to talk.

Where I came from, being unavailable =/= blendy.

Also, did someone claim that I have a game-mechanic-induced penalty to talk?

I was referring to INH’s apparent insanity this phase. You don’t seem to have anything like that afaik.

Hi MM! I get not being unavailable, but even in your post just now, you’re not offering anything new. It seems like you’re at least reading the thread.

Who would you look to vote for this phase if not yourself?

I opened up the thread to the most recent post and I saw my name in it.

I haven't really read the thread, but I'd vote Sloonei for being a tryhard, you for contemplating being blendy, or DrWilgy for reasons.


But give me a moment to settle in. I was away from mafia in general for the weekend, and not much had happened here when I was around.

Fair enough, I suppose. Move your vote and maybe I’ll move mine.

sig wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2018 2:41 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2018 2:33 pm I'm coming back to the idea of voting for sig. His attacks have been vague so far. I keep coming back to the use of his word "odd". He's been describing all of his suspicions in that manner. I'm wondering if that vague language is born out of an absence of authenticity.

You're flipflopping more than ummmm something that flipflops alot.

Though tbf I'm not the biggest fan of my role so I wouldn't mind being lynched, on the other hand I have no good reason to be lynched and if I'm NK'd then it's game over.You know I talked myself out of it I wouldn't vote for this Sig guy today.

What does that mean?

Marmot wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2018 3:00 pm [VOTE: Scotty] aubergine

I just knew you’d do that.

Unvote.
Vote LoRab aubergine

Because Sloonei said so

Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2018 3:05 pm

Scotty wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2018 3:02 pm

Marmot wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2018 3:00 pm [VOTE: Scotty] aubergine

I just knew you’d do that.

Unvote.
Vote LoRab aubergine

Because Sloonei said so

What are your thoughts on LoRab?

I don’t really have any.

But come to think of it, nor do you. What are your thoughts on LoRab? I just went through your post history and the only interaction or mention I’ve seen is telling her to vote with you for Boomslang.

But now you’re onto dog again.

I agree with jack, it seems like you’re flailing.

Yes, you have the most posts, but I have the most cat food stocked in my pantry out of all my friends. Doesn’t mean I own a cat.

FUCKIN DIUCBSKOh

dog = sig whenever you see dog it’s sig. my autocorrect is a bitch (not the dog)

LoRab wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2018 10:13 pm

Boomslang wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2018 1:44 pm
I also have an eyeball on Lorab right now. "Ugh. I have no idea where to vote. I don't actually suspect anyone" at the end of Day 1 is so noncommittal, then she votes Sloonei for "peer pressure" and the active voices in the thread don't really get on her for that lack of reasoning. She then jumps in, first post of Day 2, to begin the WIFOM about me and the Blooper kill.

And to the other posts about me (and votes): I didn't suspect anyone day 1--honestly, I still don't really have any suspects. I didn't particularly like either of the bandwagons, and they both felt like just that, so I didn't want to vote there, because I didn't trust them. I didn't like how Sloonei totally switcherooed on Sig, and how he seemed to be going after every name that came up--it seemed opportunistic. Was it enough for a vote later in the game? No. But I had to vote somewhere, and it raised my eyebrow enough that I voted there.

Day 2, you were being discussed, and I thought I'd raise that point, which hadn't yet been mentioned.

I guess I can see how those things might seem suspicious, but I'm not bad.

Also, throwing out there: tomorrow night begins the Jewish holiday in which we cosplay while eating cookies and getting drunk (yes, that really is the holiday--we also have a carnival for it). Which is much fun, but much work. And our synagogue has 3 different celebrations for it, over the next several days. I also have jury duty on Thursday. So, my time will be wonky over the next 5 days. Just giving fair warning.

So in summary:
-you have no suspects, even though you mention Sloonei as opportunistic.
-you’re not bad because you’re not bad

I’m ok with my vote staying on you.

Would you vote Sloonei now, since that’s the only read you’re offering?


Hey [mention]Jackofhearts2005[/mention] what if it wasn’t a sig / Sloonei team but a LoRab / Sloonei team? Note how Sloonei votes LoRab for no reason but doesn’t substantiate it and removes it on a whim so he can look back later and say “Hey, I voted her on day 2 guys look!”

I feel like sig and Sloonei may have just had an odd spat because you can’t say odd without sigodd

Just a thought..

Kylemii wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2018 11:41 pm

Scotty wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2018 4:07 pmYes, you have the most posts, but I have the most cat food stocked in my pantry out of all my friends. Doesn’t mean I own a cat.

is this an actual fact about your life or just a cool trendy saying? i like it either way

Yes.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2018 5:34 pm [mention]Scotty[/mention]

Why do you have cat food in your pantry?

You never know when the feline master race will knock on the door. You truly never know..