Search found 527 matches
Return to “Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]”
- Sun Jul 19, 2020 9:08 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37327
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 0]
haha im a civvie haha
- Sun Jul 19, 2020 9:09 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37327
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 0]
this is my second of sixty posts for day 0
- Sun Jul 19, 2020 9:12 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37327
- Sun Jul 19, 2020 9:14 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37327
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 0]
hi tim!
- Sun Jul 19, 2020 9:15 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37327
- Sun Jul 19, 2020 9:17 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37327
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 0]
oh no day 0 is actually thirty oh i see now
- Sun Jul 19, 2020 9:18 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37327
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 0]
anyway how are we feeling about the concept of property rights today?
- Sun Jul 19, 2020 9:21 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37327
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 0]
didnt realize zack was a philosopher
- Sun Jul 19, 2020 9:22 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37327
- Sun Jul 19, 2020 9:24 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37327
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 0]
a quick control-f on my wikipedia article does not indicate so but latin was pretty commonly taught to all the educated class back in my day so maybe i can im not sure
- Sun Jul 19, 2020 9:30 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37327
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 0]
how so? do you not believe in day 0 intros being readable?Timsup2nothin wrote: ↑Sun Jul 19, 2020 9:29 pmAs long as we have provided the answers Tony needs to advance the game to day one this seems like the legit best strat tbh.Amy wrote: ↑Sun Jul 19, 2020 9:26 pmi've always preferred the classics
anyways: hello and sorry and advance to those who don't know me. i help run mafia universe and i assure you it's not a position i attained through prowess at the game
there's like a 70% chance i'm legit just gonna fuck off until d1 glgl
- Sun Jul 19, 2020 9:36 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37327
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 0]
im town btw
- Sun Jul 19, 2020 9:36 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37327
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 0]
jesus kza wtf is that avatar
- Sun Jul 19, 2020 9:39 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37327
- Sun Jul 19, 2020 9:40 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37327
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 0]
looking to break my record of most posts in a single game on this site in this game wish me luck friends
- Sun Jul 19, 2020 9:41 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37327
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 0]
i have my ways
- Sun Jul 19, 2020 9:43 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37327
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 0]
these two posts are pretty nerdy im getting a nerdlean on benson and timBenson wrote: ↑Sun Jul 19, 2020 9:41 pmIf anything, we will get that "shitposting" out of the way now and Day 1 will start with a more serious tone. But I see your point about wanting to move along. I don't think there would or will be any deliberate stretching it out.Timsup2nothin wrote: ↑Sun Jul 19, 2020 9:37 pmThey are on par with the early day one RVS and shiptoasting stage, which we will have plenty of time for day one.iaafr wrote: ↑Sun Jul 19, 2020 9:30 pmhow so? do you not believe in day 0 intros being readable?Timsup2nothin wrote: ↑Sun Jul 19, 2020 9:29 pmAs long as we have provided the answers Tony needs to advance the game to day one this seems like the legit best strat tbh.Amy wrote: ↑Sun Jul 19, 2020 9:26 pmi've always preferred the classics
anyways: hello and sorry and advance to those who don't know me. i help run mafia universe and i assure you it's not a position i attained through prowess at the game
there's like a 70% chance i'm legit just gonna fuck off until d1 glgl
I guess I was thinking more in terms of getting our answers in and moving on as opposed to stretching day zero looking for benefits...but you raise a valid point. If you want to stretch it out and have an extended meet and greet that can be fun and maybe productive. I'm in.
- Sun Jul 19, 2020 9:44 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37327
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 0]
have you been introduced to our lord and savior, "surreal numbers"?
https://www.whitman.edu/documents/Acade ... /Grimm.pdf
- Sun Jul 19, 2020 9:44 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37327
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 0]
alright gonna save some posts now i guess
- Sun Jul 19, 2020 9:50 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37327
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 0]
alison / tutuu is a civ on civ conflict
i can tell by the pixels
i can tell by the pixels
- Sun Jul 19, 2020 9:54 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37327
- Sun Jul 19, 2020 9:58 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37327
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 0]
i just reread the entire thread and wow im actually pretty scummy wonder how many people are scumreading me
- Sun Jul 19, 2020 9:59 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37327
- Sun Jul 19, 2020 10:03 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37327
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 0]
- Sun Jul 19, 2020 10:08 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37327
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 0]
my word choice is a bit imprecise sometimes and i use connotations that dont quite work
but i got a vibe of "tunnel" from my perceived strength of the scumread there. didn't mean to imply it was persisting a long time. how's bad word choice ai though?
my rhythms too even, the "nerdlean" post was a bit scummy in itself (kinda forced joke feel adjacent to actual read but not actual read), responding to too many people and therefore exuding nervous energy
- Sun Jul 19, 2020 10:09 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37327
- Sun Jul 19, 2020 10:11 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37327
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 0]
pretty sure for actual day 1 im gonna have to restrict my own posting to like the last quarter of day or else im gonna blow all my posts stupidly and not be able to post my good reads when they actually come
so its good this night 0 phase reminded me of that
so its good this night 0 phase reminded me of that
- Sun Jul 19, 2020 10:14 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37327
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 0]
i only wanted to call civ/civ for the postgame cred tbqh
and i actually know how to post towny as scum i just sandbag as town and post stupid shit because i always become obvtown anyway
we'll see if i live up to that next phase i suppose
and i actually know how to post towny as scum i just sandbag as town and post stupid shit because i always become obvtown anyway
we'll see if i live up to that next phase i suppose
- Sun Jul 19, 2020 10:15 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37327
- Sun Jul 19, 2020 10:34 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37327
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 0]
haha still town hahahahahaha
ok 30/30 my d1 entrance will be a full readslist bai glhf
ok 30/30 my d1 entrance will be a full readslist bai glhf
- Mon Jul 20, 2020 8:21 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37327
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 0]
Spoiler: show
these are all scum posts
first is scum post, meme copypasta that's not particularly original or fitting is >rand scum (based on experience with wiggles doing it once as scum, n=1 reads goat)
everything amy's posted so far is easily postable as scum. like scarily easily. i can't find a single thought by amy that makes me want to town her, and i don't think she'd be QUITE this underwhelming as town. think she's just low wim scum because she didn't particularly want to rand scum here and can't find the motivation to put her pride on the line by trying particularly hard. clarifying that the first post was a meme (and therefore invalid reason to sus) is a bit on the flatly defensive side; that sort of sus couldve been handled in a lot more playful manner (this point might be the weakest). amy is just completely transparently joyless in this game, and i think that's because of her alignment.
might not be a particularly convincing case, but i feel pretty good about this scumread.
sorry if wrong, this is my d1 tunnel.
[VOTE: Amy] aubergine
townreads:
nutella, tutuu, protocultures
townleans:
tim, scirrus (guttest of gut), werewolfhunter, alison, long con
null/scumlean/flipfloppy:
nanook, radishes, benson, dyslexicon, coliniscool, kza, colonialbob
scumread:
amy
not giving deep reasons for any reads except the scumcase i wrote on amy for now. will start writing towncases sometime during the day, after more stuff has happened.
tempted to put benson in townleans, but... just a bit sketched by a few little things. similar thoughts with nanook/radishes. the rest of the people in that group don't seem to be playing to be read any townier than null regardless of actual alignment, so i feel like they're pretty understandable placements. also slightly sketched by alison, but i mildly mindmelded with the early tutuu sus (before i decided it was civ/civ) and thats enough to make me gth her town.
- Mon Jul 20, 2020 8:28 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37327
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 0]
iaafr also noticably turned off his online indicator so that might be scummy idk (is this an angleshoot on this site?)
- Mon Jul 20, 2020 8:32 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37327
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 0]
yall already know how easily i might flip flop off this scumread
but ive been tunneling this pretty much the entire time ive been postcapped
but ive been tunneling this pretty much the entire time ive been postcapped
- Mon Jul 20, 2020 8:35 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37327
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 0]
[mention]protocultures[/mention] btw the way to keep track of your post count is using the "posts in topic" feature imo
though you'll have to keep track of how many you were at before each phase started
though you'll have to keep track of how many you were at before each phase started
- Mon Jul 20, 2020 8:44 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37327
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 0]
just gonna note randomly that this pinged me as potentially scum with radishes (because i dont think radishes has been nearly as towny as me and tutuu and this kind of early declaration of 3 townreads comes from scum a decent amount) but this is likeNANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Mon Jul 20, 2020 3:43 am Three town (IAAFR tutuu radishes) down, too many more to go
an extremely weak read
posting it anyway because why not
- Mon Jul 20, 2020 8:45 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37327
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 0]
that said i was flattered by nanook calling me clear until d3 or whatever it was he said so im daypassing him probs
- Mon Jul 20, 2020 8:49 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37327
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 0]
aight; deal; likewise
- Mon Jul 20, 2020 8:51 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37327
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 0]
tfw have f r e e u n l i m i t e d p o s t i n g for 10 more minutes but no good shitposts in mind to take advantage
- Mon Jul 20, 2020 8:53 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37327
- Mon Jul 20, 2020 8:53 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37327
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 0]
i have no idea what that says i hope it wasnt offensive
- Mon Jul 20, 2020 8:57 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37327
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 0]
my townread on tutuu is essentially for depth and transparency of thoughts that felt genuine and idiosyncraticTimsup2nothin wrote: ↑Mon Jul 20, 2020 8:56 pm Okay, so didn't overestimate the Master Radishes. Will keep in mind.
Feelies on Alison and Tutuu based on their initial clash being too attention grabby to be w/w, and Tutuu's reaction being too calm to be a wolf randomly tunneled by a villager friend.
Any thoughts here?
my townlean on alison is because i also thought tutuu gave mild scum vibes early and alison's readiness to jump on her susses and get into the game immediately is towny in my book
- Mon Jul 20, 2020 9:03 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37327
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 0]
would you believe ive managed to stay voted on a single player for over 80% of day 1 as town beforeTimsup2nothin wrote: ↑Mon Jul 20, 2020 8:57 pm Rabbit's just Rabbit...if his Amy read flip flops less than five times in the course of D1 I will worry about him.
its happened like once in a non turbo (though it was 3/21) and in a few turbos
anyway im bringing this up because i imagine this might be one of those games; im pretty tunneled
1/60 btw
- Mon Jul 20, 2020 9:04 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37327
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 0]
now gonna actively lurk and conserve posts for the first 24h
- Mon Jul 20, 2020 9:10 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37327
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 0]
reposting this for this page and to reiterate pretty much nothing's changed except maybe moving benson up to townleansiaafr wrote: ↑Mon Jul 20, 2020 8:21 pmamy posts enclosedSpoiler: show
these are all scum posts
first is scum post, meme copypasta that's not particularly original or fitting is >rand scum (based on experience with wiggles doing it once as scum, n=1 reads goat)
everything amy's posted so far is easily postable as scum. like scarily easily. i can't find a single thought by amy that makes me want to town her, and i don't think she'd be QUITE this underwhelming as town. think she's just low wim scum because she didn't particularly want to rand scum here and can't find the motivation to put her pride on the line by trying particularly hard. clarifying that the first post was a meme (and therefore invalid reason to sus) is a bit on the flatly defensive side; that sort of sus couldve been handled in a lot more playful manner (this point might be the weakest). amy is just completely transparently joyless in this game, and i think that's because of her alignment.
might not be a particularly convincing case, but i feel pretty good about this scumread.
sorry if wrong, this is my d1 tunnel.
[VOTE: Amy] aubergine
townreads:
nutella, tutuu, protocultures
townleans:
tim, scirrus (guttest of gut), werewolfhunter, alison, long con
null/scumlean/flipfloppy:
nanook, radishes, benson, dyslexicon, coliniscool, kza, colonialbob
scumread:
amy
not giving deep reasons for any reads except the scumcase i wrote on amy for now. will start writing towncases sometime during the day, after more stuff has happened.
tempted to put benson in townleans, but... just a bit sketched by a few little things. similar thoughts with nanook/radishes. the rest of the people in that group don't seem to be playing to be read any townier than null regardless of actual alignment, so i feel like they're pretty understandable placements. also slightly sketched by alison, but i mildly mindmelded with the early tutuu sus (before i decided it was civ/civ) and thats enough to make me gth her town.
and reiterating that my vote will be on amy till further notice
[VOTE: Amy] aubergine
- Mon Jul 20, 2020 9:16 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37327
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 0]
honestly thats over half the reason; i'm ok with the radishes thoughts too
still fearing you and got pinged by some stuff though, not gonna telegraph/explain until it becomes relevant
- Mon Jul 20, 2020 9:25 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37327
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 0]
i think it's fair to not have nutella as town
ive wavered a bit but i decided her progression on me was more towny than not
probably the weakest in my top tier but theres something about the way shes forming thoughts that feels like i should just town her and not question it too much
but yeah not begrudging not having that read, idk.
(also possibly spewed v by amy hell yea preflip tunneling)
5/60
ive wavered a bit but i decided her progression on me was more towny than not
probably the weakest in my top tier but theres something about the way shes forming thoughts that feels like i should just town her and not question it too much
but yeah not begrudging not having that read, idk.
(also possibly spewed v by amy hell yea preflip tunneling)
5/60
- Mon Jul 20, 2020 9:44 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37327
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 0]
ok sure i buy it why not
[VOTE: nutella] aubergine
[VOTE: nutella] aubergine
- Mon Jul 20, 2020 9:50 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37327
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 0]
nope changed my mind again
[VOTE: Amy] aubergine
[VOTE: Amy] aubergine
- Mon Jul 20, 2020 9:55 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37327
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 0]
its still possible man i was only voted on nutella for like 2m
- Mon Jul 20, 2020 10:17 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37327
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 0]
in the world where youre town, i could buy nutella being on you being the scummiest person expressing sus of you. benson/protocultures both seem more genuinely convinced.
i noted that i was wavery on nutella earlier. that's because one of the things you took issue with in the first round of posting (her calling me in my wolfrange) was an issue with me as well. i don't think nutella actually knows my wolfrange. i just liked that she "thought about it more" and moved me to locktown apropos of nothing. i thought that was valid progression. still could've been pockety though, and calling me still in my wolfrange was still sort of pingy.
townreads of this sort are the most precarious because i could just be being pocketed, so yeah.
jumped back on because i decided your defense post still wasnt enough for me to stop tunneling you for now. though unlike what tutuu said, i'm not really trying to pressure per se, it's just an actual scumread that may or may not change. if you think you work better sans pressure, i am perfectly willing to unvote and ignore you for up to 6h to EOD, then re-verdict you then.