The Syndicate

Hey guys I am here! Glad to be back! I just got out of work so I'll have to catch up on the thread so far. I like the setup of this one like a good ol fashioned murder mystery. I think this is my first Mac game should be fun.

I always think it's funny I'm considered a new player when I actually have been on this site since 2014 haha. Probably because I'm not always super talkative but I've been trying to participate more.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 9:54 pm tbh I thought the "guy who tends to get himself lynched all on his own" was a reference to Dom.

I thought it was too.

So right now I'm feeling suspicious of both Jack and nutella. Jack specifically commented on everyone in response to g man's post except me. He would have actually had to delete my name from the original post because now it's not there. Jack has played multiple games with me so why leave me out? Accidentally forgot me? Maybe... So far whenever I've played a game with jack and he's been mafia he makes it a point not to accuse me and ends up lulling me into a false sense of security just to come out and win in the end. Last time I realized just one lynch too late that it had happened again. He said hi to me in the beginning of the game so he knows I'm here. Also, I'm not sure how to take the whole making a big deal about DFs playstyle in the beginning.

I know nutella can be waffley a lot of times but some of what she's said kind of pinged me such as saying she didn't even know that Jack already votes and thinking tony would have tmi this early in the game. Some of her posts are just contradicting statements.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 5:59 pm
sabie12 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 5:53 pm So right now I'm feeling suspicious of both Jack and nutella. Jack specifically commented on everyone in response to g man's post except me. He would have actually had to delete my name from the original post because now it's not there. Jack has played multiple games with me so why leave me out? Accidentally forgot me? Maybe... So far whenever I've played a game with jack and he's been mafia he makes it a point not to accuse me and ends up lulling me into a false sense of security just to come out and win in the end. Last time I realized just one lynch too late that it had happened again. He said hi to me in the beginning of the game so he knows I'm here. Also, I'm not sure how to take the whole making a big deal about DFs playstyle in the beginning.

I know nutella can be waffley a lot of times but some of what she's said kind of pinged me such as saying she didn't even know that Jack already votes and thinking tony would have tmi this early in the game. Some of her posts are just contradicting statements.
What are your thoughts on G-man and Tony?

Tony I'm not sure. He's pretty defensive of Jack but when he's been bad in the past he posted more and did more "reads" right away. He seems more tentative so far so I could go either way on him. What's your suspicion of him from?

Gman is putting a good amount of effort in. I don't think I ever played a game where he was mafia so Ive only seen his civ game. I don't think he has said anything sketchy so far.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 5:59 pm
sabie12 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 5:53 pm So right now I'm feeling suspicious of both Jack and nutella. Jack specifically commented on everyone in response to g man's post except me. He would have actually had to delete my name from the original post because now it's not there. Jack has played multiple games with me so why leave me out? Accidentally forgot me? Maybe... So far whenever I've played a game with jack and he's been mafia he makes it a point not to accuse me and ends up lulling me into a false sense of security just to come out and win in the end. Last time I realized just one lynch too late that it had happened again. He said hi to me in the beginning of the game so he knows I'm here. Also, I'm not sure how to take the whole making a big deal about DFs playstyle in the beginning.

I know nutella can be waffley a lot of times but some of what she's said kind of pinged me such as saying she didn't even know that Jack already votes and thinking tony would have tmi this early in the game. Some of her posts are just contradicting statements.
GMan asked me about my ability to read everyone here but you.

Actually if you look back at his post my name is there. You somehow deleted it.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 9:07 pm We are playing this game on Australian time, which isn't unfair since the 'stralians usually have to adapt to the Western hemisphere's hijinks around here. But I want to note this just in case anyone's operating under the usual clock procedures. This phase will end while most of us Americans are asleep. That includes myself. I don't know how much I'll be around tonight, so for the moment my Tony vote can be considered potentially final. At the very least, I hope that my questions for/about him can be addressed in some manner.

I do not advocate a Jack lynch today, since he's been our leader for most of the phase. nutella feels like herself, and I've liked the direction of Michelle's play so far. Other than that I don't have any strong reads worth expressing.

Yeah the timing is going to be a little hard
I'll have to get up at like 6 am on a Saturday oh well. You do make some good points on tony. Was there a list of the ISO links on everyone?

I have suspicions on all three of the people with votes. In looking through Tony's posts a lot of his focus is on jack. He makes it a point to say "if I'm nightkilled jack is scum" and that he needs a few days to figure him out subtle ways of saying dont lynch me im town without actually saying it. When he was mafia in the past his main focus of discussion was his own teammates so if they got killed off he could be like see I'm not bad. Ive seen jack do this as well. Also his post making it a point to say how many mislynches we can have was a little sketchy. I see a lot of fair points on him and he hasnt done much to counteract these points.

Jack I've expressed my suspicion on him. There's a fair amount of back and forth discussion on him but I'm still leaning towards thinking he is mafia.

Nutella can be very difficult to read as she does often follow the waves of the thread but her response to things so far hasn't made me feel confident about her being town.

This day 1 is hard there are fair points on all three. Voting tony as I feel worst about him and his efforts thus far.

RIP tony I'm sorry.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Nov 16, 2019 3:31 pm I might as well look at sabie's vote as well.
sabie12 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 16, 2019 6:33 am I have suspicions on all three of the people with votes. In looking through Tony's posts a lot of his focus is on jack. He makes it a point to say "if I'm nightkilled jack is scum" and that he needs a few days to figure him out subtle ways of saying dont lynch me im town without actually saying it. When he was mafia in the past his main focus of discussion was his own teammates so if they got killed off he could be like see I'm not bad. Ive seen jack do this as well. Also his post making it a point to say how many mislynches we can have was a little sketchy. I see a lot of fair points on him and he hasnt done much to counteract these points.

Jack I've expressed my suspicion on him. There's a fair amount of back and forth discussion on him but I'm still leaning towards thinking he is mafia.

Nutella can be very difficult to read as she does often follow the waves of the thread but her response to things so far hasn't made me feel confident about her being town.

This day 1 is hard there are fair points on all three. Voting tony as I feel worst about him and his efforts thus far.
I notice sabie seems to support Michelle's point about Tony's lynch math being "sketchy", but I continue to not know why that is the case. Sabie, what did you find suspicious about Tony counting the number of mislynches? And how does this lynch change the way you see Jack and nutella, if at all?

I've noticed in past games sometimes the mafia players will focus on rules and gameplay so they're participating but not really having to say any reads. I thought maybe he was trying to appear helpful to town. He also made it a point to say he needed time to read jack and if he gets killed jack probably killed him. He was focusing a lot on jack and I was thinking maybe they could be teammates based on the way I've seen both of them play when mafia in the past. Also you had made a decent case on tony that I felt made sense at the time.

I'll have to look more closely at jack and nutella.

Hmmm the plot thickens. Jack and tony both felt pretty confidently that nutella was bad and now they both have flipped civ. I've been iffy on nutella from the beginning and am inclined to believe maybe tony and jack were right about her. Putting my vote there for now.[VOTE: nutella] aubergine

I actually just suck at this game. I was not suggesting that nutella wanted to take them out because they suspected her. I thought nutella was suspicious from the beginning. Both jack and Tony had suspected her so I put my vote there for now. I was more so saying maybe she's worth another look since both of them seemed pretty confident she was bad and she was the main suspicion that both of them shared. Apparently, that point didn't make sense to anyone, but me.
The suspicions on michelle make sense and people have good points on her. She was another one I was going to look at.

Long Con wrote: ↑Sun Nov 17, 2019 10:43 pm
sabie12 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 17, 2019 8:39 pm Hmmm the plot thickens. Jack and tony both felt pretty confidently that nutella was bad and now they both have flipped civ. I've been iffy on nutella from the beginning and am inclined to believe maybe tony and jack were right about her. Putting my vote there for now.[VOTE: nutella] aubergine
Sounds like it was you. [VOTE: sabie] aubergine

Sounds like what was me? You also had thought jack and tony were potentially bad. I was saying tony and Jack both suspected nutella maybe we should consider they could have been right about her.

Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2019 11:33 am
sabie12 wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2019 8:13 am
Long Con wrote: ↑Sun Nov 17, 2019 10:43 pm
sabie12 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 17, 2019 8:39 pm Hmmm the plot thickens. Jack and tony both felt pretty confidently that nutella was bad and now they both have flipped civ. I've been iffy on nutella from the beginning and am inclined to believe maybe tony and jack were right about her. Putting my vote there for now.[VOTE: nutella] aubergine
Sounds like it was you. [VOTE: sabie] aubergine
Sounds like what was me? You also had thought jack and tony were potentially bad. I was saying tony and Jack both suspected nutella maybe we should consider they could have been right about her.
You killed Jack in order to frame nutella.

Kind of insulting that you think I'm that dumb. Maybe Im wrong on my read of nutella but if I killed jack why would I be that stupid obvious about it? And what motivation would I have to do so when I probably would have ended up voting jack because I thought he was bad. The only thing I'm bad at this game is reads so far which I'm not the only one.

G-Man wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2019 1:06 pm Now back to your regularly-scheduled ISO's...

SABIE12:
-Here she cays she is suspicious of both Jack and nutella. Both had votes by this point I think, so saying you're suspicious of the leading trains isn't that original. Her suspicion of Jack isn't rooted in anything from this game, and her suspicion of nutella is soft at best.

-Player reads that don't reveal much. Mentions Tony's past behaviors but also that she could go either way on him. She also likes my effort but doesn't take a stance on it, just that I hadn't said anything sketchy yet.

-Possibly her worst looking post. She says she's suspicious of Jack, nutella, and Tony. This doubles down on the "I'm suspicious of everyone you all are voting for" cop-out and diminishes the amount of original thought she needs to add to the mix. She says she already stated her suspicion of Jack early, but it wasn't based on in-game content. Her suspicion of nutella seems to stem from nutella's responses not giving off civvie vibes. Just because someone isn't giving off civvie vibes doesn't mean they're giving off baddie vibes. Saying "I think she might be bad because I can't civ read her" isn't enough. What makes her feel bad about nutella? Finally, her Tony content in this post is wordy and over-explained a bit, as if she's hoping that writing a lot justifies her vote to people. She closes it out with saying others have raised good points, giving her an excuse in a mislynch.

-Here she defends her Tony vote some more. It doesn't read well to me in part because her logic is very different from my own on discussing game mechanics.

-A little too quick to trust the dead here.

-Defending her quick vote on nutella. She also mentions that others have some good points on Michelle and that she is another that she intends to look into.

Overall, she needs to be more proactive than reactive with voicing suspicions. Agreeing with other cases is participatory, but providing more original viewpoints in engaged behavior. This could go either way, but I'm not a fan of what I see so far.

When I do voice my own suspicions everyone thinks my points make no sense and are not worth looking at and they think I'm scummy. So what's the point? I really try to participate but I don't have a computer so I really cant quote multiple posts are put together cool posts like this.

I really have no idea who is bad in this game and all I'm doing is attempting to figure that out. I just feel bad letting everyone down if I end up getting mislynched for trying.

Sorry all didnt mean to be all crazy about everything. I just get frustrated sometimes. Not anyone's fault. I'll come back to this a little later when I'm not all stressed from work stuff.
In response to sloonei I've been town reading him and gman for thier efforts in trying to get discussion going and make cases.

LC seems to be putting in little effort this game so I'm not sure about him. I thought he usually did more but maybe that's his usual? I recall his reasoning for tony suspicion being because sloonei said so. Michelle kind of just says a few things here and there without really saying anything. I think she definitely could be bad. And I thought nutella was sketchy initially but no one else seems to agree with that so.

I don't know if I've seen enough from quin or dom to think anything of. Definitley nothing on lady? She had like one post?
DF is trying to participate at the urging of jack so good on him for that.
Epi is just kinda throwing votes around wherever he feels like.

Dom is right I am moving my vote to Michelle right now. She at least popped in to kind of respond to accusations on her but I'm not really feeling she's trying to defend anything that anyone throws her way for suspicions. Her reasoning for suspecting tony wasn't explained well and she doesn't seem to be trying to do so.

Also I'm not sure what to think of the sloonei/epi dynamic. I have been seeing it as epi doesnt really have time to play so he just kinda throws suspicion around and does whatever he feels like because he's not super invested in it.
[VOTE: michelle] aubergine

Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2019 4:08 pm
Michelle wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2019 4:03 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2019 3:50 pm
Michelle wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2019 3:47 pm
sabie12 wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2019 12:09 pm Dom is right I am moving my vote to Michelle right now. She at least popped in to kind of respond to accusations on her but I'm not really feeling she's trying to defend anything that anyone throws her way for suspicions. Her reasoning for suspecting tony wasn't explained well and she doesn't seem to be trying to do so.

Also I'm not sure what to think of the sloonei/epi dynamic. I have been seeing it as epi doesnt really have time to play so he just kinda throws suspicion around and does whatever he feels like because he's not super invested in it.
[VOTE: michelle] aubergine
I see from this post that Sabie has 3 suspects.

Me, because I didn't defend myself.
Not much time ago a silly Michelle asked villager Jackofhearts to not lynch me because I will flip green and so on (MU game).Can you imagine he didn't want to hear about that?
Since then I put lower effort in self defense and I try to not put so much emotion in the game because what I want by playing is to have fun and to keep the game enjoyable.
Again I am sorry I was wrong about Tony. But you don't want to lynch me for wrong read, but because I don't defend like you would like.

Sloonei/Epi are linked in a read I don't understand. Are they suspicious or not?

oops time out
Going to do something irl and continue after, sorry I have few more things to say at this post
What is confusing about my suspicion of you?
how do you understand the sentence I coloured in orange?
I see it as Sabie mentioning a suspicion towards you and Epi.
Oh I misread your post, I thought you were saying my read confused you.

Epi has decided to give his vote to me today. He apparently does not have time to play the game fully, so he’s decided to trust me and vote for whoever I vote for. I assume that’s what sabie is referring to.

Yeah I was saying it was a weird dynamic because epi is kinda just following sloonei around and voting whatever he does. I was thinking that was due to epi being busy and unable to play.

nutella wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2019 4:19 pm [mention]sabie12[/mention] do you suspect epi and/or sloonei?

I'm not entirely certain about that. I think epi may actually just be busy and doing whatever so I wasnt really suspecting him. Sloonei on the other hand the one thing with him is that he started the train on tony and others followed (yes I know I was one of them) but he says he would have no motivation to do so as a baddie because there were already votes on jack so he could have just gone with that. maybe he would have done that though, had others not believed his case on tony. It was just a thought I've had in the back of my mind. Didn't think it was worth putting a lot of stock into unless he ended up doing that again or doing something more sketchy. The quick change to quin I would think is because quin is putting in minimal effort and voted without much explanation.

Long Con wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2019 2:56 pm The top exports of Australia are Iron Ore ($48.2B), Coal Briquettes ($47B), Gold ($29.1B), Petroleum Gas ($20.3B) and Wheat ($4.88B), so I'll keep the sabie vote where it is.

I think this is officially the weirdest reasoning anyone has ever given for suspecting me.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2019 5:28 pm @sabie12 if you have to choose, am I good or bad?

I've mostly been town reading you so far.

Sorry I wasn't around for end of day I was playing d and d. Glad we got a good result!
I feel like we need to hear more from quin LC and DF. Quin and LC especially seem to be putting little effort and not making a lot of sense with some of their posts. oh and lady if she ever decides to play this game.
I have to sleep but I'll be around as much as I can be.

RIP sloonei it's not going to be the same without you.

Welcome back lady lamda any thoughts on anything so far?

I got it Lady is actually doge the meme dog disguised as a player. Wow such fascinate so solvey.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Nov 21, 2019 12:05 am Civilians:

DFaraday
Dom
Me
G-Man
sabie12

Suspects:

LLD
Long Con
nutella
Quin

I recommend that today's lynch be among the four suspects listed here.

I agree with this list. Feeling worst about LC and quin currently. LLD is just dogeing all over the place so I don't even know what to do with that. I'll be stuck in a literal 8 hour meeting today but I'll check in periodically. I'm still unsure about nutella but she at least is putting in some efforts where the other 3 have not.

Weird (or should I say interesting) comeback from LLD. Not even really sure of the point of the disagreement between LLD and Dom. Like why try to bait people to lynch you if it's just going to end up making us more behind? We've been having a hard enough time getting on the same page as it is. LLD does come off as a bit defensive and aggressive. I don't know if that is just how they always play or because they're bad and trying to move suspicion elsewhere. I'm not a fan of the aggressive conflict playstyle but maybe they just do things differently elsewhere.

I apologize I had an 8 hour meeting and a support group and then d and d. I take on too many things in my life at once. Falling asleep

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 1:10 am
sabie12 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 1:04 am Weird (or should I say interesting) comeback from LLD. Not even really sure of the point of the disagreement between LLD and Dom. Like why try to bait people to lynch you if it's just going to end up making us more behind? We've been having a hard enough time getting on the same page as it is. LLD does come off as a bit defensive and aggressive. I don't know if that is just how they always play or because they're bad and trying to move suspicion elsewhere. I'm not a fan of the aggressive conflict playstyle but maybe they just do things differently elsewhere.

I apologize I had an 8 hour meeting and a support group and then d and d. I take on too many things in my life at once. Falling asleep
An eight hour meeting? What in God's name for?

I work in the medical field and we have to sit down and discuss every single patient all day long. It's the worst.

I don't exactly get nutellas suspicion on gman or LLD vote on dom. I do see how nutella and michelle could be connected as she seemed to have defended her and talked about her being town. And then people seem to be suggesting that nutella and LLD could be connected so this would be the exact opposite approach to a teammate if that were the case. So then that would assume that in light of michelle flipping bad, nutella thought she needed to bus her other teammate and distance herself so that no one would think anything of it. And then proceed to make it a point to say that teammates try not to interact with each other much in the thread. She changed her vote off of her but still has at some point expressed suspicion on her that she could bring up later if LLD flips bad.

LC seems a little more genuine in his approach to today than he had been previously. Could his change in gameplay be from losing a teammate or just he wants to live up to what he said about coming in mid game to solve?
Quin is either hiding behind his gimmick to get away with being scummy or he's just busy and doesn't have time to dedicate to the game so he just kinda comes in doesn't read much, posts, and then leaves.
Currently I feel worst about nutella LLD and quin.

nutella wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 2:26 pm Hmmm

LC and LLD probably not w/w?

LC seems compatible with G-man though. Timing of the Dom vote is weird after my G-man vote.

How does no one see what I see in G? His "analysis" is such a waste of space imo. He's not going anywhere with it. And as I keep pointing out, his Michelle vote was not good

I can agree that G man's most recent super long analysis post doesn't really seem to be concluding anything just explaining how votes went and then asking a lot of questions that he doesn't personally share his own ideas on the answers to. It's a lot of info without really sharing his own reads and thoughts on it.

Had a kind of scary car issue happen where my car wouldn't shift out of reverse and wouldn't shut off. Come to find out it's a recall that my dealer never notified me of that needed to be fixed. In the recall it even says may cause crashes. Now I have a scary drive over to the dealer tomorrow morning. So my anxiety is through the roof right now. Wish me luck guys

I've been reading and re reading isos and I have to go with nutella. Nutella has been a common suspicion throughout the game especially with the civs who were lynched or nightkilled so far. I don't know if I really see a reason that dom would need to bus michelle so early on in the day when he had a chance to go in other directions. He was somewhat defensive of her which may be worth looking at but his progression on day 2 to me doesnt really make sense as a michelle teammate. Nutella has been defensive of michelle and votes in her own direction away from where other suspicion is going.I know nutella has a tendency to move along with the flow of the thread either way but she hasnt felt like shes been trying to solve this game. [VOTE: nutella] aubergine

Awesome!

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Nov 23, 2019 9:28 pm
Dom wrote: ↑Sat Nov 23, 2019 9:12 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Nov 23, 2019 8:04 pm Okay then.

[VOTE: DFaraday] aubergine
Why not Long Con?
Because I'm his teammate.

I don't know. Not really sure.

You make some fair points on DF (pun intended) he defended nutella in the beginning and then kind of said he suspected her but then voted for me and then didnt vote for her til the end of yesterday. He has kind of been sliding by without a lot of suspicion thrown his way.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Nov 23, 2019 9:46 pm
sabie12 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 23, 2019 9:39 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Nov 23, 2019 9:28 pm
Dom wrote: ↑Sat Nov 23, 2019 9:12 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Nov 23, 2019 8:04 pm Okay then.

[VOTE: DFaraday] aubergine
Why not Long Con?
Because I'm his teammate.

I don't know. Not really sure.
You make some fair points on DF (pun intended) he defended nutella in the beginning and then kind of said he suspected her but then voted for me and then didnt vote for her til the end of yesterday. He has kind of been sliding by without a lot of suspicion thrown his way.
What's the pun?

Fair as in faraday it was a dumb joke. Main point is I agree with your case on him.

In looking at nutellas ISO she makes it a point to always sort of imply she town reads DF without actually hardcore defending him. She never casts suspicion on him and michelle didnt really offer a read on him either. Maybe that was intentional and DF thought he could hide behind his last minute vote for nutella at the end of the last day.

I don't know going with LC seems too easy like even DF said in a previous post why would LC try to be obvious about it if he really were a baddie. He seems sketchy but I think hes just saying whatever comes to mind randomly as he feels like.

[VOTE: Dfaraday] aubergine putting my vote here for now. I agree with this case more strongly

That is disappointing. Sorry DF RIP.

The remaining baddie is either dom or epi. Boom. *drops mic*

I was wondering why epi basically short circuited with my post. I mean at this point its either him or Dom so if we can all get on the same page we can win this. I'm unable to vote in the poll because it's glitching or something.

Dom wrote: ↑Wed Nov 27, 2019 12:43 pm You're telling me I lynched both of my teammates?

K

I've been pretty insistent on who is bad. And I've been right.

I mean I've seen people purposefully lynch teammates to get civ cred. And you know who is bad when they're your teammates. So that doesn't necessarily point in your favor.

Dom wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 6:47 pm G--

Michelle was my biggest suspicion going into Day 2. She was opportunistic day one, and did nothing to convince me otherwise in the course of day two. My other big option was nutella. I think nutella convinced me that Michelle was more likely bad through... well... I don't know. Michelle was just a better lynch candidate to me. I have to [VOTE: Nutella] aubergine to self preserve.

She's likely to be bad. I don't like her record and she isn't puttin gin the effort.

I'm very busy tonight and I have to go now. bie.

I don't know if this means anything but dom basically says he had to vote for nutella to self preserve not that he really wanted to. So if he was her teammate then at that point he couldn't really save her without being obvious so he had to bus her. Just a thought.

MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Nov 27, 2019 5:32 pm Is it fixed?

Seems to be thanks!

[VOTE: Dom] aubergine putting my vote here for now unless dom can convince me it's not him.

That's one of the best games I've ever played. I had been suspecting Dom for awhile and I was very meticulous about who I checked and making sure it wasn't going to be the night kill. When quin was killed after saying dom is a crook I was like hmmm and I figured dom thought quin was the cop. Funny thing is Dom actually called me out earlier in the game for underplaying myself and being slippery. He was actually right about that I was purposefully trying to be sneaky because didn't want anyone to know my role until just the right time.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Nov 27, 2019 11:39 pm well since everyone else is posting...

Excellent job, @sabie12. I doubt I would have had your patience, but you pulled that claim out at the perfect time and kept yourself out of harms way long enough to lock it down.

Good game to everyone. Dom had me fooled for sure. Thanks for hosting, Mac.

Oh trust me I agonized over the decision about who to check but somehow I strategically did everything just right and it all worked out. I went back and forth that one night where no one was talking I thought about trying to subtly tell everyone what was up but I didnt and that worked in my favor.

nutella wrote: ↑Wed Nov 27, 2019 11:33 pm
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 27, 2019 10:42 pm Lol @nutella gotcha.
Lmao I thought I was so obvious but for some reason people didn't believe you it was wild.

I really think my scum game has deteriorated as my town game has gotten stronger. I feel like I used to be able to have a pretty similar meta but in this and in our hydra game I just felt like a bumbling idiot lol

People didn't believe me either when I came in and was like hey guys I think its nutella! And everyone's like nah dude til the next day when someone else said it and I'm like

Long Con wrote: ↑Thu Nov 28, 2019 2:17 am When did you check me?

2 nights ago

Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Nov 28, 2019 2:20 am
sabie12 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 28, 2019 2:20 am
Long Con wrote: ↑Thu Nov 28, 2019 2:17 am When did you check me?
2 nights ago
What were all your checks?

I messed up the first one with jack and got kinda frustrated like that's happened to me before where I check the person who gets killed off. Then nutella came up town and I had to decide if I thought she was the godfather. I was like man if she is I got this game in the bag because then I can trust all my checks from now on. Sure enough she was. Then LC and LLD. I had been thinking its probably dom after the dom accusations and then when he killed quin for saying dom is bad. I was really hoping if I died that my change of heart on LC was going to be enough to clue people in without obviously stating I knew anything. If I knew when the night was going to end I thought about doing an if I die dont kill LC post but I didnt know for sure so I held off.

MacDougall wrote: ↑Thu Nov 28, 2019 6:32 am Not sure Sabie has mentioned the fact she actually green peeked Nutella and still voted for her. That was pretty wild.

Was in the middle of typing it as you posted it haha yeah it made me pause a little bit on nutella but I remembered there was a godfather and I was really hoping she was it.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 28, 2019 4:09 am
sabie12 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 28, 2019 2:03 am
nutella wrote: ↑Wed Nov 27, 2019 11:33 pm
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 27, 2019 10:42 pm Lol @nutella gotcha.
Lmao I thought I was so obvious but for some reason people didn't believe you it was wild.

I really think my scum game has deteriorated as my town game has gotten stronger. I feel like I used to be able to have a pretty similar meta but in this and in our hydra game I just felt like a bumbling idiot lol
People didn't believe me either when I came in and was like hey guys I think its nutella! And everyone's like nah dude til the next day when someone else said it and I'm like
Jack: Nutella, you better kill me now and claim to be framed cause I’m coming for ya.
Jack: *dies*
Nutella: I was framed.
Sabie: Isn’t Nutella just a baddie?
Everyone for a bit: Sabie framed Nutella.

Haha yeah exactly that's why I brefily got kind of annoyed like people thinking I would be dumb enough to kill you and then super obviously be all like oh nutella did it. I was actually moreso thinking that you and tony thought she was bad and so maybe we should look at her and see why because maybe you're right.

G-Man wrote: ↑Thu Nov 28, 2019 11:28 am Nice work @sabie12! You won us the game.

Well played @Dom. Had you not killed me, I’d have probably gone along with a Long Con lynch. There was still a nagging suspicion of you in the back of my mind, but I don’t think it was more than auto-sus after years of seeing you be devious. I can see in hindsight where you might have been hoping for others to latch onto your faux-sus of me, but it hadn’t tripped my BS alarm yet. You walked that tightrope well.

Thanks to @MacDougall for the game and thanks to you all for making it fun. I’ve been out of action for months but it was pretty easy to jump back into the thick of it. Job searching and interviews got hectic the last week or so. I wish I could have been more in-the-moment with the rest of the game but such is life.

Thanks! And good luck on the job search! And yes thanks all for a good game!

Lady LambdaDelta wrote: ↑Thu Nov 28, 2019 2:16 pm Eh he probably foes and I nees to do shit in lylo

Gross

What? You know the game ended right?

Search found 49 matches