The Syndicate

Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 10:02 pm @Ultra what does your scum hunting look like? What types of games are you used to playing, mechanics/setup-wise? What kind of pizza did you get earlier?

This is, like, the opposite of what I saw last game.

Also hi guys

Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 10:10 pm

speedchuck wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 10:08 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 10:02 pm @Ultra what does your scum hunting look like? What types of games are you used to playing, mechanics/setup-wise? What kind of pizza did you get earlier?

This is, like, the opposite of what I saw last game.

Also hi guys

What did you see last game?

Ultra has hesitant to interact with the thread, which is why I voted him D1. He spoke mostly to Nova, who was answering whatever was thrown his way. Some weird dependent thing.

This game, Ultra has already made a hot take and claimed that he's going to flex on the thread (not hesitant), and you're buzzing him with questions as if he needs the help. (Where Nova was just whatever about it)

Enough for an early townread on Ultra. Not sure what to think of all your questions yet. Feels kinda like fluff, but it's also something you do with new players.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2019 8:27 am Mac announcing his tinfoil on me right away is pretty on point.

But when I do it you gripe.

Yes, I know that he was more direct about it.

MacDougall wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2019 3:44 am So far I feel ok about speedchuck and ultra. Sloonei, nutella, Epi and MafiaMenace ping me. Sloonei mostly. He doesn't seem sincere but if I am right he'll tie himself in knots eventually so keep posting Sloo Sloo.

Would like to hear more about MafiaMenace in like 36 hours

Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2019 9:57 am

speedchuck wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2019 9:53 am

MacDougall wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2019 3:44 am So far I feel ok about speedchuck and ultra. Sloonei, nutella, Epi and MafiaMenace ping me. Sloonei mostly. He doesn't seem sincere but if I am right he'll tie himself in knots eventually so keep posting Sloo Sloo.

Would like to hear more about MafiaMenace in like 36 hours

Why not nutella?

Because he already explained his nutella ping

Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2019 9:59 am

speedchuck wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2019 9:57 am

Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2019 9:57 am

speedchuck wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2019 9:53 am

MacDougall wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2019 3:44 am So far I feel ok about speedchuck and ultra. Sloonei, nutella, Epi and MafiaMenace ping me. Sloonei mostly. He doesn't seem sincere but if I am right he'll tie himself in knots eventually so keep posting Sloo Sloo.

Would like to hear more about MafiaMenace in like 36 hours

Why not nutella?

Because he already explained his nutella ping

What did you think of it?

I don't agree with it. I don't suspect him for it.

That's why I didn't ask about it.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2019 10:19 am Soupkill is not sufficient anticlaim btw unless it is in addition to the nk, not instead of.

Unless the goal is to only have one claim confirmed townie at a time.

It depends.

Soupkill as I used it allows for light claiming as a risk to town. What you're describing is basically modkills that scum can enact without any risk.

Cooler wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2019 11:22 am Hi all,

First game here.

I tried catching up but the black background made my eyes bleed...

I'm using the light background.

Creature wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2019 2:35 pm Also signatures confuse me a lot.

Turn them off?

Luxurious wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2019 4:17 pm

nutella wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2019 4:16 pm

Luxurious wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2019 4:00 pm

nutella wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2019 3:54 pm

Luxurious wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2019 3:48 pm

Spoiler: show

nutella wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2019 3:46 pm Mac: well I'm just being cautious about him bc you know. But actually he did kinda ping me with this post

MacDougall wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2019 3:49 am This game has a good cast. There are invariably going to be some solid and prolific players who have rolled anti town here because of how many anti town roles there are and they will be trying to control the narrative... because they have to.

Concurrently if you are a civ and can give top effort I want some balls to the wall here. We aren't winning this on info. Civ voices need to dominate the thread. I want 150 pages. I want a bloodbath of analysis. I am going to be ruthless if you are phoning it in and I expect better of you. You know who you are.

Perhaps he is one of those players who have rolled anti-town, and that's why it's on his mind.

Also he suspected Epi for giving out town reads which is something town Epi does and actually I believe Mac did the same thing in scrimmage.


Mata has checked in only to laugh off Epi's statement of suspicion of her and to provide some slank cover.


Mafmen is just focused on mechanics and I feel like there were bits of it that seemed like they could have come from a scum perspective

Are you saying Mac was scum reading Epi because of the same thing he’s saying here?

Or is it that Mac was also easily handing out townreads.

Re: MM
What looked like it came from scum?

The first one.


re: mm, I'll have to look back but (a) not being as worried about the cult as ultra was, and (b) miscounting the kpn (could be faked ignorance or could be that his understanding was skewed for some other reason). and (c) just more generally he seems quite focused on the scum team mechanics as a topic (not counting Vig/SK in kpn for instance)

Okay then (a) why are you using ultra as a frame of reference for MM (b) that looks more like a tinfoil rather than a derp!town consideration (c) why doesnt he ask scum team for clarification regarding his kill instead of posting the numbers itt

Like i had a reason to view it as less town and figured we’d mindmeld on it but we didnt

Point is that it looks like words for the sake of words. Like he’s doing something rather than just twiddling thumbs

Well yeah no I agree with you on that. Maybe this wasn't clear but I suspect him for focusing on mechanics as a reason in itself, not just because of specific things I saw as scummy. Even if I didn't have those little pings (which like you said are pretty circumstantial) I suspect him for the mechanics talk as a general trend.

I need a thonk emoji

Like the thinking emoji but derpy

maybe?

That's my contribution for today.

I'm really tired.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2019 5:44 pm And leaving the decision up to the scum is better than leaving it up to the host because the number of hosts who will modkill over that is too damn low.

Are you still going on about this?

Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2019 5:22 pm

MacDougall wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2019 5:20 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2019 4:33 pm

MacDougall wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2019 4:30 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2019 4:25 pm

MacDougall wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2019 4:23 pm Sloonei. World Flags Mafia.

Bastard Game.

happened after IASIP too. But whatever. Doesn't change anything about the fact that you tinfoil me every game. You can keep doing it, I just want to make sure we're aware of the frequency of it.

I do not tinfoil you incorrectly in every game. I don't have a list but I assure you World Flags isn't the only time I have caught you. This is a hollow defence and had the added bonus of discrediting my hunches. All the new people are gonna think I'm a dumbass and ignore me now. I wanted them to like me Sloonanus but now they think I'm a joke and it's all cuz of you.

You've correctly tinfoiled me in World Flags and Ancient Greece. You've incorrectly Tinfoiled me in the four games I listed in the previous post, and now you're doing it again here. My point is that you tinfoil me in every game regardless of my alignment.

So you are saying I have never town read you?

It’s been a while since you did not suspect me heavily early in a game, as far as I can remember. I don’t think you can deny that a trend at least exists.

I don’t feel this is a very productive area of discussion, but if you have specific questions for me I can answer.

But... you brought it up though

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2019 6:10 pm Guys.

11 pages.

Day 0.

Stoooooop.

Enjoy your weekend before the D1 starts, guys, for reaaal

Luxurious wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2019 6:51 pm

speedchuck wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2019 6:48 pm

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2019 6:10 pm Guys.

11 pages.

Day 0.

Stoooooop.

Enjoy your weekend before the D1 starts, guys, for reaaal

If you post the most before the game starts you get free town points

Now you tell me

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2019 11:16 pm People keep saying MM and it makes me sad.

I miss Metalmarsh too.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat May 18, 2019 4:10 am

Dragomir wrote: ↑Sat May 18, 2019 3:57 am

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat May 18, 2019 3:53 am

Dragomir wrote: ↑Sat May 18, 2019 3:50 am

nutella wrote: ↑Sat May 18, 2019 2:08 am ok, responding to sloonei's post in order

1) not sure what you mean about "downplaying pressure" in the first point. that's just how I felt about you at the time, don't overthink it
2) what? of all the posts in my iso to pick out, you pick a one-off acknowledgment of sprityo that didn't really mean anything. I'm not sure how you got the idea I was implying I suspected him or something, it was just a joke. Like yeah it was a little rib at the fact he hadn't produced much content yet but I think you're overthinking again.
3) I don't think they're lhf. I can see why you'd feel that way about MM, which was my weakest of those suspicions, but mata wasn't really. That was an original read and you better believe it. She's not "in the same category as sprityo" at all wtf that's absolute bull.
4) And how do you expect me to react to suspicion?
5) llama thing is dumb. I'm not scum and you can cross those buns and take them to the bakery.
6) I don't feel like I'm exaggerating your suspicion, that's how it feels to me. and sure I was townreading you until some others, mostly mac, put some pressure on you that I liked the sound of and I didn't AT ALL like how you reacted to that pressure. is there something wrong with my reads evolving due to developing thread content? you are pulling this out of your ass and you know it

Yeah, I like this response very much. His entire iso was full tryhard.

What does this even mean?

You were trying to impress by going full analysis and surface level in-depth reasoning.

I don't need to try to be impressive.

Exactly. It's why we are unimpressed with your trying.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat May 18, 2019 6:18 pm Then MafiaMenace suggests the possibility of another player being "deepwolf", and these are your words:

Dragomir wrote: ↑Sat May 18, 2019 4:45 pm Deepwolf in D0 already?

You seemed to be accusing me of deepwolfing on Day 0, but then you cast doubt on MafiaMenace for suggesting the possibility of the same characteristics in a different player.

Hypocrisy is a staple of the town playbook.

Okay, I super townread Mac, Nutella, and Ultra coming into D0, and was wary of or lightly scumreading sloonei.

What's up? What's changed?

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 12:35 am

Spoiler: show

Luxurious wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 12:25 am

Sloonei wrote:

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 12:19 am

Luxurious wrote: ↑Sun May 19, 2019 9:42 pm

Luxurious wrote: ↑Sun May 19, 2019 9:41 pm

Spoiler: show

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun May 19, 2019 1:34 am "Why Lux?"
I don't feel good about this post. I don't agree with the sentiment of the first line, nor do I feel like that behavior would been to be qualified as suspicious. I also do not see why Lux is suspecting MafiaMenace for not committing to a read on Ultra right away. Lux has not playing with MafiaMenace, to my knowledge. This whole post feels like a reach for suspicion.
Moving on.
This feels a bit like a minimization of what Ultra's doing.

And the bottom line has already been called into question by Ultra. I'm intrigued by that slip, but unable to do anything decisive with it. An explanation exists. It does nothing for me.

This post bothers me for reasons that are difficult to articulate. nutella essentially just says that she is capable of seeing two sides of an argument, and that warrants a "mindmeld" comment from Lux. I dunno, I guess I'm just used to seeing "mindmeld" reserved for strong, drawn out cases, not basic gameplay. Feels like a reach to establish a bond with nutella. This comes back later in a post I've already highlighted. Time for me to share my own thoughts on it:

Spoiler: show

This mindmeld is the only thing convincing me that you have potential to be town

Again, the point which is being "mindmelded" over does not feel particularly strong or meaningful, which makes me feel like it's insincere. And I also do not like it when players dangle suspicion like this. "I would suspect you, but..."
If you are going to say that, you should attach the reasons you have for considering the person a suspect. I don't see Lux doing that anywhere. I see a lot of softball questions for people, but I don't see a really compelling chain of thoughts anywhere in Lux's ISO. And I see this read on nutella that looks very fake.

Luxurious wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2019 6:51 pm
Sloonei treating day 0 like a super extension on day 1 is like good

But I think this is a bit early of a jump

I can see this coming from an anxious town or a trigger happy scum.

Since y’all apparently bus like there’s no tomorrow here, I’m leaning scum

Another thing I hate is this. Nowhere in this post does Lux attach any of my behavior to bussing. She observes that I am being very active. She then makes the leap from "Sloonei is active" to "People on the Syndicate like to bus", and somehow puts these two pieces together to create a suspicion against me. She would later elaborate that it was "an associative read" between nutella and I, but I do not see why that is the conclusion she is drawing. All Lux has said about me is that I'm extremely active and therefore suspicious. Bogus.

tl;dr: Lux was on fire in the scrimmage. She was the town MVP. This is a limp start, and I don't see threads connecting her thoughts. Her reads feel arbitrary and baseless.

I stopped reading this when you turned my words back around on me lol

By that I mean you suspect me for doing something and then do the same thing so I’m not reading the rest of this
[/quote]

Hypocrisy is a staple of the town playbook.

But also I’m not sure what you’re referring to.

Back to looking for The One Question.
[/quote]

I fixed it because it looked so ugly

I mean firstly i dont think town usually plays hypocritically but I also feel like such a thing has happened before so Fair enough

Secondly, I say “i feel like mafiamenace is trying to discrete ultra” and you express how you think that’s shady. And then you say “i feel like lux is trying to discrete ultra”

And my brain just shuts down
[/quote][/spoiler]

That... was the point? You accused a player of being shady for a thing, and then you did the thing yourself.

That is hypocritical.

And I just said that hypocrisy is a staple of the town playbook. By that I mean that a civilian is perfectly capable of accusing a player of doing something they are also guilty of; just because I do X and know what my intentions were, it does not mean I cannot become suspicious of you when you also do X, because I do not know your intentions.

So here I am, accusing you of being suspicious because you were hypocritical, in open acknowledgment that this itself is hypocritical.
[/quote]

I randomly jumped to a sloonei post to scumread it. Had to comb a bit.

This seems really self-aware and like it's pre-empting discussion.
Which should be a scumtell, but it's been annoyingly unreliable.

Never have I been so tempted to just delete a post. What an unholy mess.

Cooler wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 10:27 am

speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 10:24 am Okay, I super townread Mac, Nutella, and Ultra coming into D0, and was wary of or lightly scumreading sloonei.

What's up? What's changed?

Can you explain your reads?

I think I did, way back on early D0. Ultra was completely different from his recent scumgame, and was really engaging the thread. Mac and nutella were also different, on a fundamental level, from what they had been.

Sloonei feels stiff and mechanical, and he's spending a lot of time inflating his post count with rote questions. At least he was early on, when he had like 2 pages of posts instead of 7.

Luxurious wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 3:05 am Like “speed scum” and then “speed scum (although Im not really feeling that anymore)”

Which hasnt really been conveyed here in such a way

But again, similar tone so huff

Did nutella scumread me at some point?

Apparently not.

I just visited nutella's ISO and I'm pretty much mindmelded. Legit have no idea why anyone would be voting there.

Of the three people voting nutella right now, at least three of them are bad.

Maybe not mafia, but just... bad. *hits them with rolled up newspaper*

But actually possibly mafia. Worth ISOing.

Long Con wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 11:02 am I am a bit concerned that Mac is buddying me by declaring me Civ for next to nothing.

Almost none of Mac's reads are substantiated. It concerns me as well.

Not because it's scummy. Mac's changing up his game completely, and somehow being completely serious and unable to take seriously at the same time, and I have no idea how to read it. Is he mixing up his town game or scumgame?

speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 10:59 am Of the three people voting nutella right now, at least three of them are bad.

Jack
Mac
Lux

But I didn't read Lux's ISO because it's too long. :3

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 11:25 am

Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 10:04 am I've been getting civ vibes on Jack. I think a baddie would be trying harder to generate a lot of reads and stuff. He is super chill about the fact he's tunneling on nutella and doesn't care about her complaints of it. And Jack does tnnel as a civ. A lot.


I don't necessarily agree with his points though, but nutella is blank for me. Will take a while for me to figure her out.

Here’s the thing, too. When I tunnel as a civ (or even as a neutral or scum player in multiball) I’m generally right.

See: Silver Lantern in Mass Effect, SenorSalt in BSG (MU), Fraggernaut in One Punch Mash (MU), Speedchuck in Ancient Greece, Rich in Restless Communication 2 (MU Discord).

I tunnel because I’m certain and I’m certain because I’m right.

I've been here over two years, and played in a lot of games with you. AG is the only correct tunnel you can reference from those games? Weak.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 11:20 am

MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 3:14 am Let's see if Jack keeps his vote on nutella.

As long as she’s a viable lynch option.

You know how I love to bus.

You and I both know that isn't true.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 11:38 am @Dragomir are speedchuck’s posts on this page more in line with my description of “Good wishywahsy” or “Bad wishywashy”?

I can’t decide.

Why ask him?

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 11:42 am

speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 11:41 am

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 11:38 am @Dragomir are speedchuck’s posts on this page more in line with my description of “Good wishywahsy” or “Bad wishywashy”?

I can’t decide.

Why ask him?

Because we just had a conversation about this last night. I want to see what be thinks.

Cool.

I am missing quite a bit of context. Thanks for the answer.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 11:57 am Give me two players you’d lynch and a third you’d maybe lynch.

"please give me player salad"

nutella wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 11:55 am (besides sloonei still but Mac is probably right that he won't realistically get lynched, and it appears I have to worry about self preservation now).

You never know until you try

nutella wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 12:44 pm It's certainly a gamble. If sloonei is town after all losing him would be a significant hot to the thread activity and we'd all have to step it up. But, if he's bad he's all the more dangerous with his influence.

It's almost like every lynch in the game is a gamble.

Do you believe he's scum or not?

I guess I should probably read Sloonei's ISO.

First page of Sloonei's ISO:

"Elaborate"
"Game rules"
"Why?"
"Game rules"
"Elaborate"
"Explain"
"Game rules"
"Single town ping statement"
"Elaborate"
"Why?"
"Elaborate"

Page 2 of Sloonei ISO:

"Continuation of page one ruletalk and 'explain' 'why'"
"Mac is town because he's falsely tunneling me. This is a defense that looks like a non-defensive townread"
"GTH anyone?" (clearly it's hard for sloonei to sheep opinions and lead the thread with so many unknowns [this is me being unfair, but my lack of fairness has caught scum in two games so far])
"townread on epi that is substantiated by meta"
"Would vote nutella for being reactionary"

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 12:57 pm

speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 12:53 pm First page of Sloonei's ISO:

"Elaborate"
"Game rules"
"Why?"
"Game rules"
"Elaborate"
"Explain"
"Game rules"
"Single town ping statement"
"Elaborate"
"Why?"
"Elaborate"

And?

I'm getting to that, there are like so many pages you moth-eaten lilac

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat May 18, 2019 2:23 am You guys what if I make 200 posts before Day 1 even starts?

Sloonei ISO page 3:

"Unfair ISO of Matahari"
"continued stuff from page 1/2"
"Some reads and suspicions that actually start to look good (or at least genuine and thoughtful)"

I've mindmelded with nutella a lot, but I mesh with this current accusation of her as well. "It probably won't work" or "I might be wrong and it's a gamble that would hurt town" is a really off reason not to lynch someone.

Since when did nutella need to consider other opinions?

I'm trying to decide if this comes from a scum perspective in a multi-team game. Is this idea of 'eh, it's a gamble, not worth' influenced by the speaker having possible access to a nightkill?

nutella wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 1:32 pm

speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 1:16 pm I've mindmelded with nutella a lot, but I mesh with this current accusation of her as well. "It probably won't work" or "I might be wrong and it's a gamble that would hurt town" is a really off reason not to lynch someone.

Since when did nutella need to consider other opinions?

I'm trying to decide if this comes from a scum perspective in a multi-team game. Is this idea of 'eh, it's a gamble, not worth' influenced by the speaker having possible access to a nightkill?

Why is this a big deal? I'm absolutely willing to pursue my suspicion of sloonei,but I also retain some wariness that I might be wrong. What's wrong with that?

Since when do you ever do that?

And from what I can tell, you are not willing. You haven't voted him. You haven't called for votes, not directly.

Dragomir wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 1:18 pm

speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 1:16 pm I've mindmelded with nutella a lot, but I mesh with this current accusation of her as well. "It probably won't work" or "I might be wrong and it's a gamble that would hurt town" is a really off reason not to lynch someone.

Since when did nutella need to consider other opinions?

I'm trying to decide if this comes from a scum perspective in a multi-team game. Is this idea of 'eh, it's a gamble, not worth' influenced by the speaker having possible access to a nightkill?

What did you guys mindmeld on?

Why does the it being a multi-ball affect what perspective she's in?

In multi-ball, scum doesn't have to fake hunting. They also don't have to commit as hard to getting someone they suspect lynched, because hey, they can just nightkill them.

That's not saying they won't fake some scumhunting, but they can legitimately hunt.

Dragomir wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 1:35 pm I'm sure there's a scum in Sloonei, Luxy, and Nutella. Might even be all 3 tbh.

The top three posters in the thread, in order. Exposure bias?

Ultra wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 1:43 pm

speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 12:48 pm I guess I should probably read Sloonei's ISO.

Why, exactly, did you feel the need to do this but also advertise it? I'm wondering why you don't have some tertiary impression from Sloonei just by reading the thread since he's the most present player. Why is your priority here to resolve him as opposed to literally anyone else unless you have a lead on him? Same thing with Nutella. Also remarkably little to say on either of them

Your presence seems lackluster compared to last game

Because I post whatever I'm doing so that people can follow my train of thought.
Because I haven't read the thread, so I didn't have an impression beyond the first five pages.
If you have someone I should make a priority, let me know.

TBH I don't have a lot of time for this game, but I signed up to get it off the ground. Judge me on what I got, not what I don't got.

Username - Posts
Sloonei - 350
Luxurious - 230
Dragomir - 135
nutella - 135
Epignosis - 117
Creature - 104
Jackofhearts2005 - 100
Ultra - 99
MacDougall - 70
MafiaMenace - 45
speedchuck - 45
juliets - 41
DrWilgy - 29
Long Con - 22
Matahari - 22
Dragon D. Luffy - 21
DFaraday - 10
sprityo - 9
Cooler - 7
sabie12 - 6
Spacedaisy - 3
dunya - 2
JaggedJimmyJay - 1

Now that I've noticed it (thanks Dragomir), I don't particularly like that all the suspicion in the thread/poll seems to be directed at the top posters. Legend has it that it's difficult to post hundreds of times as scum, and doesn't happen all that often.

Why is Lux under heavy suspicion?

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 1:49 pm Why is ISOing me the best use of your limited time? What conclusions are you drawing from this exercise?

Because you were the one scumread I had early on. Wanted to see if your ISO picked up at some point.

It did. One page 3. Your first hundred posts were garbo, but the sheer number plus the pick-up on page three has me not wanting to lynch you, especially with what Jack pointed out.

linki: You think I want busywork? I quit the ISO after I hit page 3. Doof.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 1:51 pm Jay probably mafia cause he’s not being very impactful.

He's probably silenced. I've NEVER seen a JJJ with only one post.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 1:52 pm If you’ll take a closer look at the poll, you’ll notice that the guy with 350 posts is currently voting for the guy with 7 posts.

I'm sure you've already addressed this, but why?

I keep getting Creature and Cooler mixed up.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 1:55 pm

speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 1:53 pm

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 1:51 pm Jay probably mafia cause he’s not being very impactful.

He's probably silenced. I've NEVER seen a JJJ with only one post.

Agreed but that doesn’t make him town because multiball.

Noted. I just don't think I can lynch him today though.