What are you? A lieutenant?
My land nav skills are amazing, tsk tsk
Return to “Mafia: A World Asunder - GAME THREAD [Day 13]”
The only difference I noticed was the trees/forest are more pronouncedLoRab wrote: ↑Sat Dec 08, 2018 8:27 am OK....I got wifi on the plane...
Can I suggest that we change the vote word from aubergine to something that is not one of the role names? I mean, if the point is to be easily searched, then it seems to me it would make it easier if it were a word that isn't likely to come up. Also, lol to the hosts for putting that in there.
@LC @BR: Is the difference in the map from earlier to current based on a host correction, or based on night 0 activity?
Probably no one, because I haven’t invested myself yetjuliets wrote: ↑Sun Dec 09, 2018 8:37 pm Hmmm...sloonei I think said "take a look at sprityo" and I just did. This is his only post of any consequence:
(he corrected DDL to Colin in his next post)
I don't disagree with his post but it's the only thing he's said that's relevant on day 1 (day 0 he gave us the definition of verisimilitude) and he only has 6 posts in all. This makes me nervous, it makes me think of a Day 1 lay-low baddie. I don't think it's enough to change my vote though. @sprityo if you come online could you give us some game related thoughts? Who are you going to vote for and why?
I’m high key lurking you incessant ape
MacDougall wrote: ↑Tue Dec 11, 2018 1:49 amSingle in thread interaction between the King and Prince of Chaos Mafia. Pfft as if. Mafia teammates for sure. DharmaHelper please just lynch yourself.DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Sat Dec 08, 2018 5:02 pmAdded Colin.Turnip Head wrote: ↑Sat Dec 08, 2018 3:28 pmI read this the first time but it's not exactly meaty by your standards. Why requote it?DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Sat Dec 08, 2018 2:49 pmDharmaHelper wrote: ↑Sat Dec 08, 2018 2:40 pm Anyway I've ranked the people who have currently voted from most to least suspicious as of me typing this post without being linkied into any other votes:
Cbob - "His posting" is a funny but ultimately hollow and wormy way to explain the Colin vote
Colin - "No U" vote was cheeky but still bad.
Chuck - Did not give a reason for his DDL vote which IIRC came close to if not directly after Epi said he'd be voting DDL. Chuck pulling up to the train station early AF to save himself a seat.
Sloonei - Voting for anyone based on other people's reasons for suspecting people is suspicious to me. Make your own points. Stand on your own ground.
TH - Early vote for Sorsha for a hollow, funny reason. Doesn't look serious. Sorsha's not done anything overtly suspicious. Could be buddying/distancing but not worth losing my shit over instantly.
Epi - His DDL vote makes sense, he gave a good reason and was consistent.
I’ll see if there’s anything I want to read
Awareness, information to keep in mindcolonialbob wrote: ↑Tue Dec 11, 2018 3:16 pmWhat is the desired outcome of discussing this for civs?sprityo wrote: ↑Tue Dec 11, 2018 2:44 pm I discuss what I personally deem interesting/important.
Point 1 being I made this role concept the trickster is based off of. And I have most definitely seen it used to make a town flip as mafia looking (@ quin)
Point 2: mechanically speaking the mafia would make the town less on guard, which would further present itself as a problem later on in the game. If the trickster is still alive and can forge roles, the mafia could fake even more kills and possibly their own deaths again.
The only true way to lie detect someone who is now dead is having a mortician or someone to confirm the dead’s identity, aka what I pointed out with lycantha
Until they find TH’s body we won’t be 100% sure that we actually was the trickster
it's not meant to change the way they act directly. i just said it's information to keep in mind. especially cause the statement to consider is laden with WIFOMcolonialbob wrote: ↑Tue Dec 11, 2018 5:34 pmHow does knowing this information change the way civs should act, in your opinion?sprityo wrote: ↑Tue Dec 11, 2018 3:28 pmAwareness, information to keep in mindcolonialbob wrote: ↑Tue Dec 11, 2018 3:16 pmWhat is the desired outcome of discussing this for civs?sprityo wrote: ↑Tue Dec 11, 2018 2:44 pm I discuss what I personally deem interesting/important.
Point 1 being I made this role concept the trickster is based off of. And I have most definitely seen it used to make a town flip as mafia looking (@ quin)
Point 2: mechanically speaking the mafia would make the town less on guard, which would further present itself as a problem later on in the game. If the trickster is still alive and can forge roles, the mafia could fake even more kills and possibly their own deaths again.
The only true way to lie detect someone who is now dead is having a mortician or someone to confirm the dead’s identity, aka what I pointed out with lycantha
Until they find TH’s body we won’t be 100% sure that we actually was the trickster
That’s all. I can’t be every player in the game so I have to make sure everyone can at least consider and dismiss or approve of information I think is relevant
That’s a uh. Big reaction for such a little postsabie12 wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 6:13 amSo as of right now I am the only person spirityo has accused the entire game. I don't even see a vote from them in the first lynch poll. They haven't even really shared any thoughts on anyone yet. I'm all for speculating about gameplay and roles and everything because I also do that but usually by this point in the game some of the speculation is regarding players and reads on players. Just find that interesting.
I am still not convinced wilgy isnt bad. Unless he just really doesn't care about this game at all he didn't even put up any defense about being accused or voted for. And he still really hasn't been around. It also now seems like maybe TH was defending him.
I was just speculating if TH was the trickster could he have killed nutella and someone killed him. I dont know if that really impacts anything but it would be an interesting turn of events if it did happen that way.
Can someone condense the argument on g man so I can get a better idea of where that is coming from? I didnt really get much from trying to read him before.
I know I haven't posted much there is a lot to follow and I get busy with work and things. I've been keeping up best I can though at least with reading everything.
I missed you SVS I really do. But you jump to conclusions way too fastS~V~S wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 6:41 am ebwop, also, that little mean post you made to TH that you took 2 posts to apologize for,
I know someone up there ^^ connected you to TH other ways, based on the EOD. But this is just some really nice distancing imo. I like the cut of your jib. Sorrowfully, I think it's an evil jib in this game.
It’s less about play and more about information I’ve receivedjuliets wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 8:04 amsabie, I have seen the same as you out of sprityo and was looking at him yesterday for his lack of relevant participation.sabie12 wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 6:13 amSo as of right now I am the only person spirityo has accused the entire game. I don't even see a vote from them in the first lynch poll. They haven't even really shared any thoughts on anyone yet. I'm all for speculating about gameplay and roles and everything because I also do that but usually by this point in the game some of the speculation is regarding players and reads on players. Just find that interesting.
re is a lot to follow and I get busy with work and things. I've been keeping up best I can though at least with reading everything.
@sprityo I really need to see some reads with reasons from you today, and I agree with S~V~S, why not tell us what you see about sabie12 now. You feel strongly enough to vote for her so that tells me you have defined something about her play that is problematic.
juliets wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 3:14 pmok, so you've received info about sabie. Is that information something you can share? I don''t understand your question about trusting a crazy old woman living in the woods, could you explain further? Also, what are some other reads you have that might be based on play? I'm trying to see how and what you're thinking to assess whether I think you're town or not.sprityo wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 3:01 pmIt’s less about play and more about information I’ve receivedjuliets wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 8:04 amsabie, I have seen the same as you out of sprityo and was looking at him yesterday for his lack of relevant participation.sabie12 wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 6:13 amSo as of right now I am the only person spirityo has accused the entire game. I don't even see a vote from them in the first lynch poll. They haven't even really shared any thoughts on anyone yet. I'm all for speculating about gameplay and roles and everything because I also do that but usually by this point in the game some of the speculation is regarding players and reads on players. Just find that interesting.
re is a lot to follow and I get busy with work and things. I've been keeping up best I can though at least with reading everything.
@sprityo I really need to see some reads with reasons from you today, and I agree with S~V~S, why not tell us what you see about sabie12 now. You feel strongly enough to vote for her so that tells me you have defined something about her play that is problematic.
Would you trust a crazy old woman living in the woods Juliet’s?
linki
I might as well be dabrusti from how blind I am
Who hired this guy? I’m leaving a bad review on yelpDharmaHelper wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 4:01 pmYou got it dummy.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 4:00 pm Hey folks! It's been a fun game to spectate so far. I would like to request that everyone please do your best to avoid terms in contexts that have a high probability of being interpreted as a personal attack (e.g. stupid or idiot). I realize that isn't always easy to foresee, so just use your judgment. Keep at it; it's been a clean game.
You support my first theory then of trickster faking their own death?Enrique wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 7:42 pmThere's also this.Trickster - Has an aura of three squares, within which any info that is given or received will be corrupted in the Trickster’s favour. When the Trickster kills, that kill can be forged. When the Trickster enters BTSC, it may be under any name.
Supposedly yesEnrique wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 7:49 pmI mean I don't think it's impossible but I'm not endorsing it here. Was the Trickster dead by the time you met that lady?sprityo wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 7:47 pmYou support my first theory then of trickster faking their own death?Enrique wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 7:42 pmThere's also this.Trickster - Has an aura of three squares, within which any info that is given or received will be corrupted in the Trickster’s favour. When the Trickster kills, that kill can be forged. When the Trickster enters BTSC, it may be under any name.
This woman is described as “mad” and this is what you would call an NPC, so it’s not from any other playerLoRab wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 8:03 pmAs has been said, it's a difference in culture. Some of us come from a culture where info dumping is either explicitly not allowed in games, or is generally considered bad form. So, even when we aceept that it is part of this culture, we still don't necessarily like it.sprityo wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 7:23 pm I agree with you Mac, SVS is starting to rub me the wrong way
Also who cares about info drops??? What good does it do me to withhold that information? Talking about it later like “oh yeah I saw colonel mustard in the dining hall with the candlestick” isn’t gonna help us 3 days from now
As I asked above, do you know anything about the source of this information? Is the woman a force for good? Does her information come from hosts or from another player? Does she always tell the truth?
And why are you interpreting as necessarily being that sabie is bad, as opposed to sabie is physically adjacent to someone bad?