The Syndicate

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Sun Aug 27, 2017 1:00 am

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sun Aug 27, 2017 12:53 am I do have an observation though:

Some are worried about "powerful" roles coming in and doing harm. So naturally people want to remove those roles.

INH just told everyone he has a role that isn't going to harm anybody in any way.

So why is he getting all these votes? If it's so he can have more fun, fine. Cool. But it's weird to me that people are ready to shove a benign role out the door on Day 1.

Are people wanting to discard a benign role and give INH the chance to have a crazy or dangerous role?

Personally, I like INH having a boring role. He can't screw anybody with it.

Who would you like to lynch, Epignosis?

Elohcin wrote: ↑Sat Aug 26, 2017 8:10 pm It's a difficult choice, but you know I have to go with Epi for my sexy sing-along vote. But I must set the record straight and say, that is not how Epi really sounds in the bedroom.

juliets wrote: ↑Sat Aug 26, 2017 2:42 pm Epi, thank you. I have been trying your solution with a test file but can't get it to work. I really don't want to spend any more time on this today and it's due today, I am just going to take the penalty. It's not like there's anyone I wanted to vote for anyway but I appreciate your trying to help. Maybe I shouldn't vote for you either on day 3.

nutella wrote: ↑Sat Aug 26, 2017 12:29 am

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Aug 26, 2017 12:23 am

nutella wrote: ↑Sat Aug 26, 2017 12:21 am

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Aug 26, 2017 12:14 am

nutella wrote: ↑Sat Aug 26, 2017 12:04 am Voting for Rico is a weak cop-out if I ever saw one.

More importantly, how is voting Ricochet a cop-out? And why do you feel so strongly about it?

It feels weak because of the way the idea of voting for him came up in the thread yesterday and the way a few people have so easily latched onto it. Idk, to me it just feels like one of those cases of D1-thoughtless-bandwagoning syndrome. Speedchuck voted for Rico because he hates the gimmick, and then Sloonei just jumped on with that because he didn't have any other ideas. Soon everyone will just be lazily wandering into the thread and going "oh, looks like people are voting rico, cool, I'll do that too, whatever" and boom that's how most lame-ass day 1 lynches that go nowhere get started.

It "feels" weak.

Were this an actual Mafia game, I might concur, but it isn't. As far as I'm concerned, Rico could get lynched every Day from here on out and I wouldn't care.

I bet you'd care if you happened to suffer some kind of adverse effect from his role getting lynched.

nutella wrote: ↑Sat Aug 26, 2017 12:21 am

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Aug 26, 2017 12:14 am

nutella wrote: ↑Sat Aug 26, 2017 12:04 am Voting for Rico is a weak cop-out if I ever saw one.

More importantly, how is voting Ricochet a cop-out? And why do you feel so strongly about it?

It feels weak because of the way the idea of voting for him came up in the thread yesterday and the way a few people have so easily latched onto it. Idk, to me it just feels like one of those cases of D1-thoughtless-bandwagoning syndrome. Speedchuck voted for Rico because he hates the gimmick, and then Sloonei just jumped on with that because he didn't have any other ideas. Soon everyone will just be lazily wandering into the thread and going "oh, looks like people are voting rico, cool, I'll do that too, whatever" and boom that's how most lame-ass day 1 lynches that go nowhere get started.

nutella wrote: ↑Sat Aug 26, 2017 12:04 am Voting for Rico is a weak cop-out if I ever saw one.

nutella wrote: ↑Sat Aug 26, 2017 12:04 am Voting for Rico is a weak cop-out if I ever saw one. Every time he's done a stubborn posting schtick he has been a civ.

speedchuck wrote: ↑Fri Aug 25, 2017 10:27 pmVoting rico

Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Fri Aug 25, 2017 10:07 pmHere we go.

speedchuck wrote: ↑Fri Aug 25, 2017 10:27 pmVoting rico

speedchuck wrote: ↑Fri Aug 25, 2017 8:39 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Aug 25, 2017 8:07 pm That actually had'nt occurred too me.

had'nt

had'nt

HAD'NT

H A D ' N ' T

Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Aug 25, 2017 7:30 pm

Golden wrote: ↑Fri Aug 25, 2017 7:25 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Aug 25, 2017 7:14 pm

Nachomamma8 wrote: ↑Fri Aug 25, 2017 6:54 pm Sloonei gets a penalty vote every time he makes a grammatically incorrect post or he gets a penalty vote if he messed up period?

If it's the former I think we might be able to bury him via reported infractions, and even if causing his death invited my own I think it might be excellent fun to play grammar Nazi for a little while.

I won't incur any penalty votes. My English degree finally has value.

What do you mean finally? You only graduated about 10 seconds ago.

Nine seconds wasted.

Long Con wrote: ↑Thu Aug 24, 2017 10:08 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Aug 24, 2017 10:03 pm

Long Con wrote: ↑Thu Aug 24, 2017 9:56 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Aug 24, 2017 9:49 pm LC never has good points. He has self-serving points people think are good points.

No, I make the good points that are also self-serving.

Sometimes. Sometimes not.

What team do you think it would be best to try and eliminate? Let's see if we get an answer or a non-answer.

Long Con wrote: ↑Thu Aug 24, 2017 9:56 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Aug 24, 2017 9:49 pm LC never has good points. He has self-serving points people think are good points.

No, I make the good points that are also self-serving.

juliets wrote: ↑Thu Aug 24, 2017 7:33 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Aug 24, 2017 7:26 pm I already did every possible calculation of chapter and verse number I could think of before I needed a beer.

All I've worked out is that he isn't an even.

"How long will the Evens be exalted over me?"

And that he prefers the ESV.

Lol, I read that as he was an Even because they would be exalted (great happiness) over his role. Speed, since you made the rules after I guessed can I guess again? I know, I know, I said I was going to quit but I just can't help myself.

Made wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2017 10:14 pm I still am very confused, but I've always been a learn by doing rather than a learn by seeing. Good luck have fun all!