Return to “[ENDGAME] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)”
No. JJJ was a civilian, and Sloonei was a civilian.
I said as much already. People like JJJ, Sloonei, MacDougall, et al. come into a thread early and lay down some bullshit on people, and then analyze how people react.
My assumption was that he was slinging shit to sling shit. He called it a joke. That's not the same thing.
Listen old timer.
That's civilian JJJ slinging shit at civilian Kylemii, and Sloonei followed suit by slinging shit at Kylemii.
Really.rabbit8 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 9:20 pmEpignosis wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 8:54 pmI didn't take it as a joke. I didn't take it as serious, but not a joke either. I thought you were going somewhere with the "red peek." You didn't go anywhere.MacDougall wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 5:13 pm The red peek was just a joke obviously. I am voting nutella today for no reason. I haven't really focused much on the games for several days as I have been working so I've just been posting dumb shit. I'll try a bit more tomorrow when I am at my desk at work. Presuming I don't get lynched today.
Really?
I didn't take it as a joke. I didn't take it as serious, but not a joke either. I thought you were going somewhere with the "red peek." You didn't go anywhere.MacDougall wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 5:13 pm The red peek was just a joke obviously. I am voting nutella today for no reason. I haven't really focused much on the games for several days as I have been working so I've just been posting dumb shit. I'll try a bit more tomorrow when I am at my desk at work. Presuming I don't get lynched today.
MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 7:38 pmU badnutella wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 7:27 pmyou're asking all these questions to the point of sounding fake
idk the chance that you're actually teammates is probably pretty low, especially with all this interaction right after the game thread opens on day 0, but still I could see it as a possibility based on this behavior. and making a bold assertion like this should stimulate the discussion. hence the hot take
MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 9:39 pm I am Merry and I got to start the game with a red peek on nutella.
MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 10:51 pmNah my red peek says that it is definitely not false info in the PM.nutella wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 10:06 pmNo. I'm not bad. You're either making shit up (about a role that doesn't even have a power) or you for some reason mysteriously got false info on day 0. I'm gonna go with making shit up. Whether that's for a discussion-stimulating pro-civ motive or a scum anti-civ motive is yet to be seen... but if you want to lynch me it will only hurt the civs.
MacDougall went on about a "red peek," which I figured was his way of generating something to talk about.MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 11:06 pmNo he isn't. He's expressing something that sounds like that that is far more likely to have been thought of by a scum player trying to think of their opportunities and he has implied that I was legitimately role claiming rather than fake claiming, realised it and then made that afterthought part of the post to counteract it, then he looked at his post and thought he'd done a good job cleaning it up but he hadn't unfortunately.nutella wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 11:04 pmwhy do you think Kyle is bad? He's expressing a very civ-minded strategic thought in this postMacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 10:53 pmYou're bad too btw.Kylemii wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 10:33 pm i also don't think we should be so relaxed about roleclaiming. doing it helps the mafia narrow down who frodo is, and the role list also has additional civ roles "intended for mafia claims" so i don't think roleclaiming should even necessarily be a reason to trust someone.
2 scum found.
Also I have a red peek.
MacDougall had a chance to put nutella in the running to be lynched Day 1:MacDougall wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 3:00 amGotta lynch someone
But he didn't take it. MacDougall voted Sloonei.DFaraday
3
18%
Voters: rabbit8, timmer, Long Con
Long Con
3
18%
Voters: Sloonei, Ambray, Epignosis
nutella
2
12%
Voters: Glorfindel, novaselinenever
Sloonei
1
6%
Voters: MacDougall
I will judge you once there has been a mafia lynched. So keep doing your thing.Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:14 amI'd prefer it, yes.Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:08 amThat depends.
Does my reason have to be substantial?
That if you're bad, nobody's ever going to lynch you because you're running the show.
None of the fucking votes had "substantial reasons." I don't care who you are. It was Day 1. People made shit up to vote. That's fine.Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:20 amWe've just had an extended discussion about the reasons timmer and DFaraday cast their votes. I based my vote off things that happened in the thread. Others probably had reasons for their votes. I assumed it was more than just pure randomness that compelled you toward Long Con.Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:07 amName one other person Day 1 who had substantial reasons for their vote. Name one.
Who do you think you might vote for today and why won't it be Long Con?
Name one other person Day 1 who had substantial reasons for their vote. Name one.
Kiss my ass.Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Feb 01, 2018 10:30 pmSo either you voluntarily voted for Long Con, or you attempted to randomize today's lynch result. Which was it and why did you make your choice?
He isn't "transparently townie." I don't even know what that means.Glorfindel wrote: ↑Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:53 pmAbove all the candidates in that mix he is without doubt (in my opinion) the most transparently Townie. He’s an asset to us - if you’re one of us?Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:50 pmWhy is that?Glorfindel wrote: ↑Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:48 pmBecause (in my view) if he’s the Mafia-leaningist player we have playing here, we’re in a LOT of trouble.Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:46 pmWhy would I do that?Glorfindel wrote: ↑Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:45 pm Can we please save Master Sloonei from this ridiculous multi-way tie?
Why is that?Glorfindel wrote: ↑Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:48 pmBecause (in my view) if he’s the Mafia-leaningist player we have playing here, we’re in a LOT of trouble.Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:46 pmWhy would I do that?Glorfindel wrote: ↑Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:45 pm Can we please save Master Sloonei from this ridiculous multi-way tie?
Why would I do that?Glorfindel wrote: ↑Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:45 pm Can we please save Master Sloonei from this ridiculous multi-way tie?
Famous last words.
It was a joke. timmer hadn't voted yet, so nobody jumped, but I didn't want my joke wasted.Kylemii wrote: ↑Thu Feb 01, 2018 8:30 pmto rephrase, what did you mean by the "ding ding ding"Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Feb 01, 2018 8:25 pmMacDougall.Kylemii wrote: ↑Thu Feb 01, 2018 8:22 pmEpi, do you suspect Timmer or DFaraday?Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Feb 01, 2018 8:18 pmDing ding ding!timmer wrote: ↑Thu Feb 01, 2018 8:14 pm I'm going to put my vote on DFaraday.
I agree with his briefest of points about rabbit, that he hasn't contributed much, but then again, neither has Wilgy (all jokes), neither has DF himself ( posts), or novaselinenever (barely here), neither have I, really. In a game full of quiet players, singling one out who doesn't have an established meta while others with established metas run rampant with jokes etc and you give them a pass just feels cheap and like something a mafia would do. Why tangle with a meta people know when you can vote the new guy?
We have a winner!
Tell him what he's won, Eönwë!
who won and what did they win? who is Eönwë
MacDougall.Kylemii wrote: ↑Thu Feb 01, 2018 8:22 pmEpi, do you suspect Timmer or DFaraday?Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Feb 01, 2018 8:18 pmDing ding ding!timmer wrote: ↑Thu Feb 01, 2018 8:14 pm I'm going to put my vote on DFaraday.
I agree with his briefest of points about rabbit, that he hasn't contributed much, but then again, neither has Wilgy (all jokes), neither has DF himself ( posts), or novaselinenever (barely here), neither have I, really. In a game full of quiet players, singling one out who doesn't have an established meta while others with established metas run rampant with jokes etc and you give them a pass just feels cheap and like something a mafia would do. Why tangle with a meta people know when you can vote the new guy?
We have a winner!
Tell him what he's won, Eönwë!
Ding ding ding!timmer wrote: ↑Thu Feb 01, 2018 8:14 pm I'm going to put my vote on DFaraday.
I agree with his briefest of points about rabbit, that he hasn't contributed much, but then again, neither has Wilgy (all jokes), neither has DF himself ( posts), or novaselinenever (barely here), neither have I, really. In a game full of quiet players, singling one out who doesn't have an established meta while others with established metas run rampant with jokes etc and you give them a pass just feels cheap and like something a mafia would do. Why tangle with a meta people know when you can vote the new guy?
I don't know how much stock I would put in LC's last performance being a predictive measure of future performances. That's the case for most veteran players. Long Con is my strongest suspicion right now, but saying that is akin to saying a man with three tharni is the wealthiest man in Gondor.Kylemii wrote: ↑Thu Feb 01, 2018 6:47 pmReally good joke.Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Feb 01, 2018 6:41 pmRoof builders?Kylemii wrote: ↑Thu Feb 01, 2018 5:42 pm Reading through LC's iso... I see a lot of questions being asked but he hasn't really done much follow up work on many of the things, other than his view on Nutella. In general, in comparison to fiddler mafia I'm seeing a more relaxed and less focused LC.
I'd appreciate if some other Roof Builders would compare and contrast LC's early game behavior between this game and that one.
These people live under hills!
Roof builders?Kylemii wrote: ↑Thu Feb 01, 2018 5:42 pm Reading through LC's iso... I see a lot of questions being asked but he hasn't really done much follow up work on many of the things, other than his view on Nutella. In general, in comparison to fiddler mafia I'm seeing a more relaxed and less focused LC.
I'd appreciate if some other Roof Builders would compare and contrast LC's early game behavior between this game and that one.
