The Syndicate

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 9:24 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 9:17 pm Hopefully people are taking notice of how Jack is on this little crusade to lynch INH voters. Lynch me, lynch Tony, lynch Ricochet. Maybe by then, people will wake up.

Jack still can't explain his theory that one or two of us were trying to save LC, when all Long Con's teammate had to do was vote Dom. I could have easily voted Dom because I voted Dom Day 1. He's going with this because it helps him set the agenda for Day 3. Don't let it happen.
Nice attempt to change the subject.

This is one of the most annoying things in mafia to me.

Someone gets suspected for weak reasons. But, simply due to their name being thrown around, and a large part of the thread detailed to discussing them, they become legitimate targets for the lynch, mostly out of the other players' laziness.

Epi doesn't want to engage, because the more everyone talks about me, the easier it's gonna be to lynch me. It's in his best interest to prolong and prolong as long as humanly possible, and hope that sheer momentum pokes players into not reading the exchanges and instead assume that there's logic-based reasoning there. As long as he makes me into an option, that's one more option that's not him or his teammates.

I would love to change the subject. I just commented about that in a recent post.

Yes, I think you are bad, but my mind is open.

Golden wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 9:24 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 9:17 pm Hopefully people are taking notice of how Jack is on this little crusade to lynch INH voters. Lynch me, lynch Tony, lynch Ricochet. Maybe by then, people will wake up.

Jack still can't explain his theory that one or two of us were trying to save LC, when all Long Con's teammate had to do was vote Dom. I could have easily voted Dom because I voted Dom Day 1. He's going with this because it helps him set the agenda for Day 3. Don't let it happen.
What if Dom is also lcs teammate? I don't like this straw man. The idea that some inh voters were aiming to save lc is a fundamentally sound line of enquiry, whether it's ultimately right or wrong. I don't believe jack is lying about it being a genuine hunt.

I considered this, but I don't think Dom is Long Con's teammate. Dom voted for himself. Do you think Dom is Long Con's teammate?

I'm going to step back from this exchange. I think a lot of Mafia games get burned to the ground because people are sold on their own pet theories and the outliers don't get any scrutiny.

Get ready outliers. Scrutiny's a comin.

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 9:18 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 9:12 pm
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 9:11 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 9:05 pm
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 8:57 pm
(Expected response: LC was clearly bad?

Preemptive answer: Yes, which you would know if you'd stop pretending to not understand Golden's case on him. Answer the question.)
And do me a favor- lay off the snotty bullshit please. I didn't understand Golden's case on LC. Apparently a dozen other people didn't either. I get you think I'm bad. You don't have to be snotty about it. Ask your questions and move on.
Of all the players who played in Blue Velvet, why is INH the most likely curser?

Not just more likely than LC. More likely than all of them to the point where he should be lynch target priority #1.
INH revels in self-incriminating schemes. I just said this.
The literal only thing I can think of that you could possibly be referring to is the Game of Champions where I lied and said I developed a program which could tell me whether or not someone was bad by analyzing their word choice compared to other games. I was an independent role who got more power the more their name was mentioned. This was also like four years ago.

Not really comparable to this.

I also recall one I didn't play in which you made a bold, open plan to get everybody a win.

Let's do this: I didn't curse Ricochet, and let's say you didn't. Who do you think did?

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 9:14 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 9:12 pm
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 9:11 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 9:05 pm
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 8:57 pm
(Expected response: LC was clearly bad?

Preemptive answer: Yes, which you would know if you'd stop pretending to not understand Golden's case on him. Answer the question.)
And do me a favor- lay off the snotty bullshit please. I didn't understand Golden's case on LC. Apparently a dozen other people didn't either. I get you think I'm bad. You don't have to be snotty about it. Ask your questions and move on.
Of all the players who played in Blue Velvet, why is INH the most likely curser?

Not just more likely than LC. More likely than all of them to the point where he should be lynch target priority #1.
INH revels in self-incriminating schemes. I just said this.
Citation needed. I've never seen this.

You've probably never seen a naked woman, but I promise you they exist.

Hopefully people are taking notice of how Jack is on this little crusade to lynch INH voters. Lynch me, lynch Tony, lynch Ricochet. Maybe by then, people will wake up.

Jack still can't explain his theory that one or two of us were trying to save LC, when all Long Con's teammate had to do was vote Dom. I could have easily voted Dom because I voted Dom Day 1. He's going with this because it helps him set the agenda for Day 3. Don't let it happen.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 9:11 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 9:05 pm
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 8:57 pm
(Expected response: LC was clearly bad?

Preemptive answer: Yes, which you would know if you'd stop pretending to not understand Golden's case on him. Answer the question.)
And do me a favor- lay off the snotty bullshit please. I didn't understand Golden's case on LC. Apparently a dozen other people didn't either. I get you think I'm bad. You don't have to be snotty about it. Ask your questions and move on.
Of all the players who played in Blue Velvet, why is INH the most likely curser?

Not just more likely than LC. More likely than all of them to the point where he should be lynch target priority #1.

INH revels in self-incriminating schemes. I just said this.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 9:04 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 8:59 pm
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 8:57 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 8:53 pm I will once you explain to me how Long Con told the Faceless Old Lady what to curse Rico with.
Beside the point.

Of the remaining players who played in that game, why is INH the one most likely to use that curse?

Keep in mind that some of us didn't play in Blue Velvet and only know what you and Rico are on about through context clues.

Since LC was clearly bad, explain how you are so sure INH is the curser that you were willing to lynch INH instead of LC?

(Expected response: LC was clearly bad?

Preemptive answer: Yes, which you would know if you'd stop pretending to not understand Golden's case on him. Answer the question.)
I don't think LC would curse someone with that. LC is far more creative.
And all the others who aren't LC or INH? How did you know they weren't the curser?

Refuses to lay out his case. Makes getting further details feel like pulling teeth. Accuses anyone who doesn't agree with his unstated logic of being teamed with INH, who, again, is bad for reasons Epi refuses to state. Yet Epi was the one trying to prevent an LC lynch and we know LC is bad.

Epi. Check yer role pm. Cause you're bad.

Did I say I knew they were the cursing person?

You have such an agenda.

I hope if I get lynched, people wake up and take you down right behind me.

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 9:03 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 8:59 pm
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 8:57 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 8:53 pm I will once you explain to me how Long Con told the Faceless Old Lady what to curse Rico with.
Beside the point.

Of the remaining players who played in that game, why is INH the one most likely to use that curse?

Keep in mind that some of us didn't play in Blue Velvet and only know what you and Rico are on about through context clues.

Since LC was clearly bad, explain how you are so sure INH is the curser that you were willing to lynch INH instead of LC?

(Expected response: LC was clearly bad?

Preemptive answer: Yes, which you would know if you'd stop pretending to not understand Golden's case on him. Answer the question.)
I don't think LC would curse someone with that. LC is far more creative.
So now we're just full-on insinuating that I lack creativity compared to others, therefore I must be the one who cursed Rico?

Because I've been having the sinking feeling that's been the underlying sentiment behind this entire thing.

I don't think that's it. You revel in self-incriminating shit.

Who do you think cursed Ricochet?

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 8:57 pm
(Expected response: LC was clearly bad?

Preemptive answer: Yes, which you would know if you'd stop pretending to not understand Golden's case on him. Answer the question.)

And do me a favor- lay off the snotty bullshit please. I didn't understand Golden's case on LC. Apparently a dozen other people didn't either. I get you think I'm bad. You don't have to be snotty about it. Ask your questions and move on.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 8:57 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 8:53 pm I will once you explain to me how Long Con told the Faceless Old Lady what to curse Rico with.
Beside the point.

Of the remaining players who played in that game, why is INH the one most likely to use that curse?

Keep in mind that some of us didn't play in Blue Velvet and only know what you and Rico are on about through context clues.

Since LC was clearly bad, explain how you are so sure INH is the curser that you were willing to lynch INH instead of LC?

(Expected response: LC was clearly bad?

Preemptive answer: Yes, which you would know if you'd stop pretending to not understand Golden's case on him. Answer the question.)

I don't think LC would curse someone with that. LC is far more creative.

I will once you explain to me how Long Con told the Faceless Old Lady what to curse Rico with.

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 8:48 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 8:40 pm
insertnamehere wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 8:35 pm Epi, for the second time, can you verbalize your stance on me? I asked you yesterday, and you completely brushed me off.

I'd extend that question to everyone who has bandied about my name. Give me a case or some substance to respond to at least.

Imma gonna ISO Epi.
I think you and your team cursed Ricochet. I know people want to write off the Poppy business, but I came in here at one point to say exactly what Ricochet had already said regarding the curse. Someone who played Blue Velvet is on the cursing team. I sure as hell didn't curse Rico with that nonsense, and Long Con didn't. I think you did. It's that simple. Is it a sexy case? No. But it doesn't have to be sexy to be right.

Protip: Next time pick a curse nobody can link you to. Ask your teammate Jack for suggestions.
So, you think someone who was in BV must be on the cursing team. LC was in Blue Velvet. So was Speedchuck, Wilgy, Timmer, Sprityo, and of course Ricochet.

Assuming that LC wasn't the one who told Faceless Old Lady what to curse Rico with, why does it have to be me and not one of the many other people involved in that game?

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 8:35 pm Epi, for the second time, can you verbalize your stance on me? I asked you yesterday, and you completely brushed me off.

I'd extend that question to everyone who has bandied about my name. Give me a case or some substance to respond to at least.

Imma gonna ISO Epi.

I think you and your team cursed Ricochet. I know people want to write off the Poppy business, but I came in here at one point to say exactly what Ricochet had already said regarding the curse. Someone who played Blue Velvet is on the cursing team. I sure as hell didn't curse Rico with that nonsense, and Long Con didn't. I think you did. It's that simple. Is it a sexy case? No. But it doesn't have to be sexy to be right.

Protip: Next time pick a curse nobody can link you to. Ask your teammate Jack for suggestions.

I looked at the votes with the alternate view that Long Con was being thrown under the bus. I don't think that happened either. speedchuck voted first, as he did with Made. I don't think Lorab is the type to shell a teammate like that (although I don't know what she meant about ties- I don't recall it being a tie when she voted). sprityo's reasons for voting LC look organic enough. INH voted to save his own ass.

No, Long Con's team stayed on the sidelines.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 7:56 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 7:30 pm No, I didn't know that already. I can't read your mind.

And if I could, I would hear, "Hey guys, who are we killing tonight?"
So you've never heard of distancing?

Like I said, faker, you're the best at pretending not to understand.

I am not pretending not to understand.

You are just bad at communicating. I took you to mean that I voted INH as a means of saving LC rather than as a deliberate means to remove INH from the game.

No, I didn't know that already. I can't read your mind.

And if I could, I would hear, "Hey guys, who are we killing tonight?"

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 7:16 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 7:07 pm Hey Jack, what's your opinion on INH?
Null on his own merits.

I'm shit at reading INH. He always dies before I figure him out and seems to be playing with cards close to his vest.

I didn't play in the Poppy game so "INH would have used a Poppy curse" doesn't sway me, at least not without more consensus. (Two, three people weighed in on it?) Is there further reason behind suspicion of him?

I don't think he's w/w with any of the players who voted for him yesterday. I feel you and Tony wanted him dead over LC and Rico hasn't backed off either.

You feel like Tony and I wanted him dead over LC?

News flash: I did want INH dead over LC.

I voted for him.

Hey Jack, what's your opinion on INH?

Why didn't I vote Dom, Jack?

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 1:52 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 1:43 pm Jack has a dismissive tone whenever he talks or asks about INH, as though the INH voters were taken in by flawed reasoning. That's a subtle defense of INH, and the sudden urgency to lynch the INH voters reeks of an agenda.

I believe INH and Jack are teammates.
And your desire to save the non LC voters just makes you more LC's buddy.

Save the non-LC voters? There's fifteen of them.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 1:43 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 1:32 pm No, I didn't.
Didn't or don't?

Am I supposed to read it again or am I supposed to "hunt?"

Jack has a dismissive tone whenever he talks or asks about INH, as though the INH voters were taken in by flawed reasoning. That's a subtle defense of INH, and the sudden urgency to lynch the INH voters reeks of an agenda.

I believe INH and Jack are teammates.

No, I didn't.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 1:16 pm K.

Why didn't you want to vote for LC, Epi?

You don't think Golden's "playing the ball" arguement held more water than "You know, I bet INH would give a Poppy curse"?

Why do you think Tony voted INH, considering he's barely played with the guy?

I didn't want to vote for LC because I didn't have much of an opinion on him.

I don't understand Golden's "playing the ball" argument. I also don't care for someone voting and then trying to get other people to vote somewhere else.

I don't know why Tony voted INH. You could ask him.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 1:09 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 1:07 pm
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 1:06 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 1:04 pm
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 1:02 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 12:59 pm So Jack is sold that LC's team tried to save him, even though he didn't vote to save himself.
LC wasn't around. This doesn't necessarily apply to his teammates.

Just like other people being quiet in BTCC lately doesn't necessarily apply to Golden.

Bad logic, baddie.
It's not bad logic. It's a different perspective. You don't do well with those.
Luckily, I can tell bad perspectives I disagree with (Epi) from good ones I disagree with (Lorab).

Please explain how LC not voting to save himself means his team didn't.
I don't need to explain it. You are assuming LC's team tried to save him. I am not making that assumption.
I explained why the votes were saves.

You are arguing they weren't with no reasoning.

I think you are wrong. All LC's team had to do to give him a chance (or save him outright) was to vote for Dom, who trailed LC by one vote.

That was not an attempt to save him.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 1:08 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 1:06 pm
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 1:04 pm A tie vote of 2 on teammate and 2 on another player and lots of suspicion all around with 90 min to go?

Then 4 votes hit elsewhere in that last 90 min?

You're damn right I think someone was trying to save LC.
If INH had been lynched, and was shown to be mafia, you would think the votes on LC were a save attempt.
Not really. The case on LC was much stronger.

I don't agree.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 1:08 pm Speed and LC voted early. Golden and Lorab said LC was bad before INH was even a real option. INH votes self preservation.

There were no votes to save INH.

Where did LC vote?

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 1:06 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 1:04 pm
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 1:02 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 12:59 pm So Jack is sold that LC's team tried to save him, even though he didn't vote to save himself.
LC wasn't around. This doesn't necessarily apply to his teammates.

Just like other people being quiet in BTCC lately doesn't necessarily apply to Golden.

Bad logic, baddie.
It's not bad logic. It's a different perspective. You don't do well with those.
Luckily, I can tell bad perspectives I disagree with (Epi) from good ones I disagree with (Lorab).

Please explain how LC not voting to save himself means his team didn't.

I don't need to explain it. You are assuming LC's team tried to save him. I am not making that assumption.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 1:04 pm A tie vote of 2 on teammate and 2 on another player and lots of suspicion all around with 90 min to go?

Then 4 votes hit elsewhere in that last 90 min?

You're damn right I think someone was trying to save LC.

If INH had been lynched, and was shown to be mafia, you would think the votes on LC were a save attempt.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 1:02 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 12:59 pm So Jack is sold that LC's team tried to save him, even though he didn't vote to save himself.
LC wasn't around. This doesn't necessarily apply to his teammates.

Just like other people being quiet in BTCC lately doesn't necessarily apply to Golden.

Bad logic, baddie.

It's not bad logic. It's a different perspective. You don't do well with those.

So Jack is sold that LC's team tried to save him, even though he didn't vote to save himself.

Golden wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 10:57 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 10:56 pm
Golden wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 10:52 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 10:48 pm Long Con was Marcus' teammate. That warrants analysis.
What do you make of LC's reaction that he 'was' going to be lynched. Fake, or clearing the inh voters from being Marcus?
I'd need to see the post.
Do you intend to try to find it?

Not right now.

Golden wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 10:52 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 10:48 pm Long Con was Marcus' teammate. That warrants analysis.
What do you make of LC's reaction that he 'was' going to be lynched. Fake, or clearing the inh voters from being Marcus?

I'd need to see the post.

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 10:48 pm Four people I'm gonna be looking at Day 3, provided I'm still able to look at people by that point:

Epignosis
TSP
Elochin
Boomslang

Go ahead and look.

Long Con was Marcus' teammate. That warrants analysis.

DFaraday wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 10:04 pm Actually I guess it's good I missed it. We can narrow down Marcus this way.

Bunch of people missed the vote.

"Narrow down Marcus."

Jesus.

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 9:55 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 9:45 pm
insertnamehere wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 9:41 pm Rainbow list of people currently with votes:

INH
Dom
TSP
LC
Golden

Even my lowest ranked isn't someone I'd be super comfortable lynching.
Whom would you want dead?
I'd rather see Boomslang, Sprityo, or Elo's name up there than any of the already chosen options, but that's just off the top of my head.

Also, can I ask why you voted for me?

I said why.

Insertnamehere

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 9:41 pm Rainbow list of people currently with votes:

INH
Dom
TSP
LC
Golden

Even my lowest ranked isn't someone I'd be super comfortable lynching.

Whom would you want dead?

Golden wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 9:36 pm I quoted it above for you!

I see.

Nah.

Golden wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 9:26 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 9:24 pm Golden, what is your opinion of INH? My impression is that you aren't happy with it.
I can't read inh for shit, but this is legitimately the first game I've ever played with him where I get no baddie vibes with him. On the other hand, I think there is legitimate in thread evidence that LC perpetrated the curse.

I guess what I'm struggling with is... is inh the kind of guy to do something that so obviously links back to him? And I have no answer to that, because I don't understand his brain.

What is the in-thread evidence that LC perpetrated the curse?

Golden, what is your opinion of INH? My impression is that you aren't happy with it.

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 9:20 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 9:00 pm
Golden wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 8:57 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 8:56 pm To answer my own question, INH. I agree with Ricochet about the curse.
That's interesting. You'd put inh ahead of Tony?

I also think the 'inh did the curse' thing has merit. So does LC doing it, though. It has to be someone who actually read the game it came from, I don't know who was in that game.
I would. I know INH better than I know TonyStarkPrime (however much anyone could "know" INH- I honest to God PMed him when I saw his location was Lumberton, NC, since Lumberton is 30 minutes from house. He never responded). TonyStarkPrime could be the guy I said he was, but so could a bunch of other people. Hell, let him live long enough and maybe he'll expose himself if I'm right. There's still plenty of mafia to go around.
I honestly didn't receive a PM from you about that.

Lumberton NC is the location in which the movie Blue Velvet is set, not my actual location for the record.

I gathered.

Golden wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 9:14 pm Or he sent in no PM and then faked it.

To what end?

Golden wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 9:10 pm Glad you've caught up on LoRab, Epi I actually think my declared town core is one we should try to rely on, because I believe in it (the marginal reads aside, which are all leaning further away rather than into those reads now).

I've considered rico self-cursing, but I don't think so. I got the sense his flow was disrupted. I still think LC's immediate reaction post to Rico's curse is relevant. Possibly its inh and LC together.

If he "self-cursed," then it would mean someone else is cursed, or the cursing person was blocked or forgot to send in a PM.

I am right now ready to lynch INH.

Dom wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 9:06 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 9:02 pm
Dom wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 9:01 pm
Golden wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 8:57 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 8:56 pm To answer my own question, INH. I agree with Ricochet about the curse.
That's interesting. You'd put inh ahead of Tony?

I also think the 'inh did the curse' thing has merit. So does LC doing it, though. It has to be someone who actually read the game it came from, I don't know who was in that game.
Do we know it's a curse?
Do you see anybody else posting anything funny?
Would you put it past Ricochet to do some sort of stunt in his posting every day?

I don't put anything past anybody. Do you?

Ricochet is stubborn. I would expect more faces from him.

Holy shit.

First time for everything. I think Lorab is...

...

Spoiler: show

Dom wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 9:01 pm
Golden wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 8:57 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 8:56 pm To answer my own question, INH. I agree with Ricochet about the curse.
That's interesting. You'd put inh ahead of Tony?

I also think the 'inh did the curse' thing has merit. So does LC doing it, though. It has to be someone who actually read the game it came from, I don't know who was in that game.
Do we know it's a curse?

Do you see anybody else posting anything funny?

Golden wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 8:59 pm How about this question, epi... with dom, golden and LC alive, would you still vote INH?

Yes.

*from my house

Search found 173 matches