The Syndicate

Sorsha wrote:Epi- did you have info on me or was it just a lucky guess that I was bad?

Neither.

I had no information (I was vanilla civilian), and I wouldn't call it a "guess." My belief that you were good was based on certain assumptions, and, while I was reviewing your posts, I found out some of those assumptions weren't true. For example, I believed you could have voted out llama if you wanted to, but then I read back and saw that you kind of closed that door when you called llama good, thereby forcing your hand a little during Day 1.

You played very well though. I was going to feel like a complete heel if my change of opinion regarding you had been unfounded.

What were the other prizes for the labyrinth game?

Long Con wrote:
Epignosis wrote:I thought after I got DDL, I would succeed in doing my job and drawing the Night kill.

Mafia, why didn't you kill me?
Why was that your job? Sassiness?

Drawing the night kill.

When you are vanilla, that is your job.

I thought after I got DDL, I would succeed in doing my job and drawing the Night kill.

Mafia, why didn't you kill me?

Quin wrote:
Epignosis wrote:Long Con, what did Quin realize that I was lying about?

I was referring to 3J's name being included in the Casual Friday post.
...I did not see this.

Mongoose included 3Js name in the casual Friday post, and I urged her to fix it. You said, "I noticed and thing but I shouldn't say anything."

I assumed you saw what I had. What did you notice?

Long Con, what did Quin realize that I was lying about?

I was referring to 3J's name being included in the Casual Friday post.

I think Made did a great job being bad and he should know it.

If it's not over, you clowns just outed yourselves to the secret serial killer role, Granny Jeans.

Long Con wrote:I think the first time we saw someone silenced was after you subbed in, juliets.

Precisely. But juliets' reaction was one in which she was surprised.

Hmm.

INH is either silenced or pretending to be silenced.

Long Con wrote:So where is your vote going, Epi? Your Sorsha home run was great, any repeats planned?

I have no idea. All I know is where I'm going.

Home.

Made wrote:Linki: I have. In monopoly where I was killed night one because I some how slipped I was bad, and in a heist a few weeks back.

Spoiler: show

Good times.

Do you recall which heist?

Made, have you ever been bad on The Syndicate? If so, when?

Another point: Made has largely been absent. If he's bad, then he's Overalls, the team killer. Do you believe he was the one sending in the kills? I certainly don't believe he was the one choosing the kills. DDL was lynched Day 1 and Wilgy was more or less absent too- these kills seem like Sorsha-directed kills.

I don't feel like Made is the correct call. I read through his 24 posts and I get the impression that he's lost but trying to contribute and coming across in an awkward manner that some people are interpreting as bad. Made's concern has been with avoiding ties. If he's Mafia, then he would secretly be happy with ties. So here is my question: Do you believe Made was faking his concern regarding ties, and if so, why?

Those are independent occurrences: Sorsha throwing two of her teammates under the bus doesn't mean anybody else was or was not.

juliets wrote:Epi, here's something I'm thinking about: it seems like the quin kill would be one INH wouldn't want to make because that would leave just he and LC of the axis of evil group making his lynch more likely. Do you disagree?

I will admit though its a close call for me between Made and INH.

From the standpoint of who is "next in line" for getting lynched, a Quin kill would be odd for anybody.

juliets wrote:
Scotty wrote:
Epignosis wrote:I still think voting Wilgy instead of 3J Day 3 is a solid point in Made's favor. Scotty, and those suspecting Made, how do you interpret that?
Sorsha bussed DDL. What do you make of that?

I agree with this thought.

Scotty stated a fact and then asked a question. What thought is it you're agreeing with?

Long Con wrote:
Epignosis wrote:I'm trying to see a clear picture of the whole team's activity.

Sorsha was a double busser (DDL and Wilgy).
Wilgy was a saver (DDL).
Made was a misser (Day 1) and potentially a busser (Day 3) when he had an avenue to be a saver.

I don't know. I just look at INH's votes and see him voting against lynching a bad guy at every turn.
Apart from Wilgy's day 1 save attempt, it seems like a team of bussers. You're not convincing me to believe Made wasn't bussing with this post... quite the opposite.

"A team of bussers" is hardly accurate. There is one confirmed such mafia: Sorsha. That's it.

I'm trying to see a clear picture of the whole team's activity.

Sorsha was a double busser (DDL and Wilgy).
Wilgy was a saver (DDL).
Made was a misser (Day 1) and potentially a busser (Day 3) when he had an avenue to be a saver.

I don't know. I just look at INH's votes and see him voting against lynching a bad guy at every turn.

I still think voting Wilgy instead of 3J Day 3 is a solid point in Made's favor. Scotty, and those suspecting Made, how do you interpret that?

Mongoose wrote:
Epignosis wrote:Mongoose.

I love you.

Marry me.

Don't tell Eloh.

We can get married in the Wedery.
lol.

Wedery is maybe the worst word I've ever heard. There's also a Bikery, Trunkery, Drinkery (bar), and Rinkery (skating rink).

Those who made up those names should be dragged out into the street and shot.

Mongoose.

I love you.

Marry me.

Don't tell Eloh.

We can get married in the Wedery.

Whoooooo is bad? Who who, who who?

At least I got to see some tits tonight.

Long Con wrote:Then I don't get the reluctance. He's dead, what harm can it do? Why so secretive?

I don't like needlessly calling attention to things that should be overlooked.

Long Con wrote:
Epignosis wrote:Hey LC- what did I lie about?
Oh, that.

I mixed up two Quin quotes. I'm sorry about all that.

The one that you and juliets are referring to... It was about JJJ wasn't it?

'Twas.

Hey LC- what did I lie about?

Scotty wrote:
Epignosis wrote:Last mafia go.
Lion-o

HOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

Last mafia go.

I wear this one a lot.

My favorite is the one that says "Fuck you Hassan Whiteside and Paul Millsap."

Long Con wrote:LOL sure... as if people are going to go for a Boomslang vote at this point.

Nobody was going to go for Sorsha until I spoke up.

Boomslang wrote:
Epignosis wrote:I can't believe you guys fell for that.
WHAT

This post served a purpose. Knowing Sorsha was about to get lynched, did Boomslang- the final Mafia- fabricate this reaction to my joke? I'd like to think he didn't, however:

Sorsha wrote:
Boomslang wrote:My gut is telling me bad things about Sorsha. Spelling errors, shrug emoji, impatience... it doesn't read the same sort of impatience as Quin and INH, which makes me feel like it's feigned. Screw it, voting Sorsha.
Spelling errors make me bad? How about autocorrect and in not bothering to fix it because I'm on a phone at work and not supposed to be? What a lame suspicion boomslang.

I'm a little leery here though. That's laying it on thick and heavy. It reeks of bad acting.

Results so good they had to be posted twice.

Boomslang wrote:
Epignosis wrote:I can't believe you guys fell for that.
WHAT

Mongoose isn't even online. Relax. Thought that'd be real funny.

I can't believe you guys fell for that.

If Made is good, then I say the final two bad guys are Sorsha and INH. I think Sorsha is being absurd in her fears about the weight llama had Day 1. That's bogus.

Sorsha wrote:We've all been through the conversation of whether llama was serious or not already. I didn't take it seriously at the beginning which was what made jjj suspicious of me. He thought I should have made sure if llama was serious or not before joking about it. And he did have a reason for voting me. It doesn't take much to get lynched on day one. Saying that something wouldn't work AFTER it hasn't worked

If you think I'm really bad then just vote me Epi. I'm at work, I'm training someone and the vote ends in an hour. I can't be sitting here arginine for that long.

Okay.

Sorsha wrote:
juliets wrote:
Sorsha wrote: <snip>
I recognize the benefit of bussing a teammate for the credibility but, with what I was going through day one here, I would have just told my teammates to buss me for the credit. It would have been easy enough to do. wifom argument I know but really, llama and jjj were both after me day one. Its more like me to just go ahead and take the death and let my teammates take the credit.

Also, there are a few players with good voting records that have not been targeted. Why hasn't anyone tried killing niju? Her record is nearly as good as mine. Boomslang was targeted night one but since then- and his votes on both ddl and wilgy he has extremely high civ credit. Why haven't they taken another shot at him? You have also had a pretty high degree of trust in this game, why have you not been targeted?
Sorsha I guess one thing that occurs to me is you don't have that choice to get bussed if people start voting for DDL first.

I don't know why blooper and booms haven't been nk'd either. I brought that up in my discussion of Booms (at least about him).

My gut is starting to trust Scotty's assertion that he knows who LC and INH are which means my vote is probably between Made and Sorsha.

linki: ok Epi I'll just forget it and assume you were just playing and I just don't get it
Llama started his suspicion of me right off the bat this game. I'm not sure when the DDL votes started coming in vs when jjj began his case on me. But yes, with llama coming right out like that, if I was bad, I'd have told my teammates to go for it.

But that would be silly. thellama73 voted for you for no reason at all. You really think llama's vote there meant anything to anybody else? You genuinely thought your lynch was going to occur?

I mean...because if I were your teammate, and llama voted for you like he did, I would have told you to enjoy the Day 1 lynch immunity.

Sorsha wrote:So you're just going to use the fact that the baddies haven't targeted me for a nk as a strike against me but not address it for who else it applies to.

Your suiting facts to fit your own narrative.

I don't have a narrative.

And that's hardly my main reason for suspecting you. It's a footnote, if anything. But it's a footnote I did address. They already tried to kill Boomslang. nijuukyugou just basically shows up and votes. And I'm cute.

The mafia have made several strategic kills and left you alone when nobody at all has been suspecting you. I don't have a reason to explain why they haven't tried to kill you. I don't like suspecting people for that reason, but in certain scenarios, it has to be considered. Someone voting out two mafia with almost perfect timing, after having not talked much about one of them? And then, after voting 3J, you do an about face the next Day and vote for Wilgy?

Sorsha wrote:I'll most likely be voting for jjj also today. I'd hate to see a no lynch but I'm going to hope that he's lying about either his prize or what happens.

If Wilgy is the second most vote recipient that would be good I think. Hopefully if jay does have immunity it'll just go to the next highest and I've got no reason to believe Wilgy is civ.

Sorsha wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
Sorsha wrote:I'll most likely be voting for jjj also today. I'd hate to see a no lynch but I'm going to hope that he's lying about either his prize or what happens.

If Wilgy is the second most vote recipient that would be good I think. Hopefully if jay does have immunity it'll just go to the next highest and I've got no reason to believe Wilgy is civ.
Why the heck would that happen?
Because I refuse to believe that there are going to be multiple opportunities for no-lynches to happen. There's a role that has it and ties are no lynches... and now prizes being handed out are going to give no lynches? This game will never end!

Sorsha wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Sorsha wrote:I'll most likely be voting for jjj also today. I'd hate to see a no lynch but I'm going to hope that he's lying about either his prize or what happens.

If Wilgy is the second most vote recipient that would be good I think. Hopefully if jay does have immunity it'll just go to the next highest and I've got no reason to believe Wilgy is civ.
Why don't you just vote Wilgy today and Jay tomorrow then? Why risk an actual no lynch happening?
Ok.

I don't know. I just don't get the impression that you are a civilian with a lot of Leprechauns on your side.

juliets wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
juliets wrote:I fell asleep reading LC's posts and now I need to cook dinner and try and think.

Epi, my google translate says this means "One. I cannot post when my son is evil". Can you enlighten me as to what you are talking about (I don't totally trust google translate)?

Epignosis wrote:
Boomslang wrote:The only thing that makes sense to me about the Quin kill is that it was Made looking to throw me off the trail. I had associated him and Quin previously; how better to protest innocence than to cast a non-influential vote for Quin, then nightkill him? That way, Made gets to say both that he agreed with my assessment of Quin and that he's civ because Quin flipped civ. I also think Scotty is making some useful points, and I could lean that way today.

Interestingly, the only people left alive who voted Quin on Day 2 are Scotty, Blooper, Epi, and me. I don't know if that's useful, considering both JJJ and Quin were NKed, but just a thought. And Epi's missed a couple of votes, so it's harder to get a read on him beyond the Wilgy vote. Which would've been a brilliant bus.

Linki: INH's record is pretty abysmal, and very llama-tunneling. Hmm.
I missed one. Uno. No puedo publicar cuando mi hijo es malvado.
Trust the translator.
Ok but I still don't understand. Am I the only one who is not getting this? You said you didn't suspect Booms so it's not about him I don't think.

It's really not worth thinking about.

Sorsha wrote:Epi, why you no answer my questions.

Or respond to my post in any way. It's like your just trying to throw some shade my way but not listen to any explanation.

Again, throwing shade doesn't mean what people around here think it means. Throwing shade means to insult somebody with sufficient plausible deniability. If someone shows up at your party wearing cheap knockoff sunglasses, you might say in front of others, "Oooh, girl look at you! You must've spent a fortune on those shades!"

And that would be throwing shade.

I responded to your post in part above. As for your questions about why people aren't dead, I assumed those were rhetorical. I have no direct insight into the mind of our killer. I can only speak for myself. They tried to off Boomslang, so I'm not thinking much about him. nijuukyugou pops in and says a thing once a phase, so she's not exactly driving discussion. I'd leave her alone. And nobody has killed me because I look damn fine in denim.

Sorsha's reaction to and remarks about llama now don't jive with me.

Sorsha wrote:It was day one and I was also made to defend myself after my first post in this game.

If I take llama's vote Day 1 for the same reason Sorsha did, I shrug my shoulders and say to myself, "I ain't getting lynched today." Indeed, Sorsha's only vote that day was from thellama73.

I'm not sure why Sorsha defending herself against llama's nonsense precluded her from talking about DDL before she lynched him.

Note this: Sorsha had already said that she thought llama was good.

Sorsha wrote:
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:One question, Sorsha:

What is your read on llama?
I don't think llama is bad, wouldn't vote for him. He's just wrong.

I think 3J and I had this backwards. We've been thinking Sorsha had the perfect opportunity to vote for thellama73 Day 1 because of the way he came out of the gate toward her, but that's not the case. Sorsha tied her own hands Day 0 when she said she wouldn't vote for him.

Had she voted thellama73 when it mattered, this very post would have been raised as evidence against her.

juliets wrote:I fell asleep reading LC's posts and now I need to cook dinner and try and think.

Epi, my google translate says this means "One. I cannot post when my son is evil". Can you enlighten me as to what you are talking about (I don't totally trust google translate)?

Epignosis wrote:
Boomslang wrote:The only thing that makes sense to me about the Quin kill is that it was Made looking to throw me off the trail. I had associated him and Quin previously; how better to protest innocence than to cast a non-influential vote for Quin, then nightkill him? That way, Made gets to say both that he agreed with my assessment of Quin and that he's civ because Quin flipped civ. I also think Scotty is making some useful points, and I could lean that way today.

Interestingly, the only people left alive who voted Quin on Day 2 are Scotty, Blooper, Epi, and me. I don't know if that's useful, considering both JJJ and Quin were NKed, but just a thought. And Epi's missed a couple of votes, so it's harder to get a read on him beyond the Wilgy vote. Which would've been a brilliant bus.

Linki: INH's record is pretty abysmal, and very llama-tunneling. Hmm.
I missed one. Uno. No puedo publicar cuando mi hijo es malvado.

Trust the translator.

Boomslang wrote:The only thing that makes sense to me about the Quin kill is that it was Made looking to throw me off the trail. I had associated him and Quin previously; how better to protest innocence than to cast a non-influential vote for Quin, then nightkill him? That way, Made gets to say both that he agreed with my assessment of Quin and that he's civ because Quin flipped civ. I also think Scotty is making some useful points, and I could lean that way today.

Interestingly, the only people left alive who voted Quin on Day 2 are Scotty, Blooper, Epi, and me. I don't know if that's useful, considering both JJJ and Quin were NKed, but just a thought. And Epi's missed a couple of votes, so it's harder to get a read on him beyond the Wilgy vote. Which would've been a brilliant bus.

Linki: INH's record is pretty abysmal, and very llama-tunneling. Hmm.

I missed one. Uno. No puedo publicar cuando mi hijo es malvado.

Long Con wrote:Do you have anyone you believe is Civ for any reason?

I feel most confident that Boomslang and nijuukyugou are not bad.

Long Con wrote:
Epignosis wrote:My vote is probably going to one of you, INH, LC, or Sorsha.
What are your chances of voting for me today?

I don't know. I feel like if I vote for you, it would be because you've done a piss poor job finding mafia and have been stubborn- neither of those are good enough on their own Day 6 to warrant a lynch though. I'm more suspicious of Scotty, INH, and now Sorsha after digging through her Day 1 posts. Speaking of coincidences (

), Sorsha posted right before I accused her. She said this:

Sorsha wrote:Boom and niju: have both voted for both baddies. I feel like that should really eliminate them from suspicion, I could see one bus but two in three days with no civ dead yet I find hard to believe.

It's important to note that the underlined applies to her too. If Sorsha is bad, this is a subtle way of reinforcing people's good opinion of her.

Long Con wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
Long Con wrote:Ok. Then you're lying. The rest of the thread can judge that however they like, but I know what Quin knew and Epignosis cannot know what it is. He is not sharing what he supposedly knows because he only claimed to know Quin's secret, and was "keeping it", in order to look Civ.
Or Quin realized something other than what I did at that precise time.
You seem pretty sure of yourself here:

I know what thing he realized

You seem pretty sure of yourself all the time.

Long Con wrote:Ok. Then you're lying. The rest of the thread can judge that however they like, but I know what Quin knew and Epignosis cannot know what it is. He is not sharing what he supposedly knows because he only claimed to know Quin's secret, and was "keeping it", in order to look Civ.

Or Quin realized something other than what I did at that precise time.

Long Con wrote:Ok, share what it was then. Or some sort of key word.

No.

Search found 253 matches