The Syndicate

insertnamehere wrote:I commend deception of every stripe.

This is Survivor, peeps.

Golden wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

Golden wrote:Sure, but her role card had a large part to do with that. Actually, I see winning immunities as making a claim less strong... who is to say she wouldn't have been voted out if there was a chance?

LoRab asked Quin what I hoped she did. I don't like that Quin implied LoRab didn't deserve to win. She's there without the rolecard that Quin has (finding idols easily) or opt has (winning challenges easily). LoRab's done it socially alone.

I missed this business about winning challenges and idols with ease. Please enlighten me.

Opt's role gave her advantages in the challenges. Quin's role told him where idols were so he could just go find them every time they came back out.

Golden wrote:Sure, but her role card had a large part to do with that. Actually, I see winning immunities as making a claim less strong... who is to say she wouldn't have been voted out if there was a chance?

LoRab asked Quin what I hoped she did. I don't like that Quin implied LoRab didn't deserve to win. She's there without the rolecard that Quin has (finding idols easily) or opt has (winning challenges easily). LoRab's done it socially alone.

Epignosis wrote:Four straight immunity challenges tho

insertnamehere wrote:When I hear that a certain contestant is lying, backstabbing, and manipulating others to their benefit, it only makes me want to vote for them to win.

I hope that people are able to look at this decision objectively instead of deciding purely based on "who was I aligned with/who screwed me over".

I kinda think that's tacky.

Golden wrote:

Epignosis wrote:You should know by now that guys don't survive LMS events here.

Why did I get voted out so early? I was just trying to be generally useful.

You and notsawyer, both just were easy votes that no one seemed likely to oppose. At least that's why I did it.

S~V~S wrote:Also what happened is that they decided in advance who was next and that was that. They told you in chatrooms and you got blown off if you disagreed. So I rebelled and you see how that worked out. We would have been better off with the guy with the bat tbh. Lynching Faraday was stupid and someone needed to take the blame for it imo, but I guess not.

So sorry people who died since the merge.

I will enjoy watching them turn on each other. Opt doesn't seem very comfortable with conflict.

speedchuck wrote:How does one win Ponderosa?

Does anyone want to discuss the questions we'll be asking the survivors?

Scotty wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

Scotty wrote:There is such a lack of involvement in the thread. There's a reason the votes were so spread in the last tribal council. Who do you all think is leading the tribe? Because most people don't seem to know.

Free BTSC is the problem. Make people talk in the thread and you have a show.

I thought getting BTSC with someone was a treat but when 99% of conversation is deciding who is talking to whom...zzzzzzzzzzz. My role ability was purposeless really.

Yes, that's understandable. But you also didn't request BTSC in the early goings. I've actually had people get peeved they don't have enough BTSC. So you can't win em all.

I'm not sure imposing, say, a minimum post count in thread is going to get discussion going either.

As for your role, it was more based in vote manipulation, which can be very powerful.

Scotty wrote:There is such a lack of involvement in the thread. There's a reason the votes were so spread in the last tribal council. Who do you all think is leading the tribe? Because most people don't seem to know.

Scotty wrote:7. Dead players and Non-players MAY NOT POST. There will be a specified area for deadies (and non-players) to talk amongst themselves.

notsawyer540 wrote:Can't wait for this poll to end. Really want to vote for drinking with friends.