Search found 396 matches

by Epignosis
Sat Dec 16, 2017 10:14 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 158554

Re: Mountain Mafia [END]

Sloonei wrote: Sat Dec 16, 2017 1:08 am
Kylemii wrote: Sat Dec 16, 2017 12:33 am i agree day 1's no lynch tie ruling was a safety net we probably didn't need, but the day 2 lynch was a calculated risk taken by the mayor role, i think that one was fair.

I think in general, roles whose only purpose is to be guaranteed to be harder to kill at night should be limited to like... maybe 1 per game, depending on how many other roles can fuck with the kills.
I think what epi's point is is that there were more opportunities for town roles to make a play like the one I did on Day 2 than there perhaps should have been. I faced some pressure on Day 2 and had no reason to worry about the consequences, then I was relatively unquestioned as town for the rest of the game. Essentially the same thing happened with nutella on Day 1.
Also, consider that the more time (i.e., Day phases) civilians have to talk, the more the game swings in their favor. Speed games at face value are a slight benefit to mafia because the Day phase lasts just 24 hours. The lack of death prolonged the civilian ability to generate discussion and gave them time to process their thoughts.

Regarding survivals, I believe those should be highly limited, if used at all.

Aconcagua is akin to an automatic doctor protection or lynch stop, which can only serve to clear Aconcagua (mafia have no way to stop a lynch).
Chimborazo could become automatically protected or stop a lynch, which could only serve to clear Chimborazo (mafia have no way to stop a lynch).
Kilimanjaro is an automatic three-shot doctor protection.
Pico Cristóbal Colón can stop lynch, which could only serve to clear Pico Cristóbal Colón (as mafia have no way to stop a lynch).
Blanc is a semi-doctor (stopping a kill by switching targets, as actually happened).
Matterhorn can become immune to kills.

That is a half a dozen ways to prevent a Night kill, and three of those can occur more than once. Even lynching three of these roles early is detrimental to the mafia, since the only mechanical way of surviving a lynch is by not being mafia (assuming the lynch stopper didn't unwittingly save mafia).

Add to this that:

Everest has a double vote.*
Elbrus is a semi-cop.
Pico de Orizaba is vengeful.
Kenya is a semi-vigilante.

And you can see that the deck is truly stacked against mafia.

*I am also puzzled with regard to Everest's +1 vote getting perpetually inherited. This makes the civilian faction +1 for the entire game, doesn't it? Was it ever even possible for a lone remaining mafia to win? And considering that Matterhorn achieved immunity from death, wouldn't Matterhorn eventually inherit the +1 vote?
by Epignosis
Fri Dec 15, 2017 11:59 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 158554

Re: Mountain Mafia [END]

I had a good time overall (except for Day 1 :meany: ), but I suspect the mafia did not.

Civilians should not be able to survive at the rate they did in this game. Mafia couldn't kill. Their kill was almost useless. Couple that with the public clearings due to vote mechanics, and you have a scenario in which Mafia can never win because they will be swiftly outed.

If you run this setup 100 times, how many times will civilians win? How many times will Mafia win?

I would argue that Mafia wins less than 10% of the time.

Mafia have to be able to kill and have their kills go through in order for them to have a chance of success. If a doctor gets lucky night after night, fine- that's a fluke. If multiple mafia kills can fail for multiple reasons, rethink the setup.

Even the lynches were bad for the mafia:

Day 1 should have been a success for the mafia, but it instead worked against them.

Day 2 should have been another success for the mafia, but it instead worked against them.

Civilians should never be able to clear one another at the rate they did here, and mafia shouldn't have multiple failed kills without a lucky doctor.

Just my opinion.
by Epignosis
Fri Dec 15, 2017 2:42 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 158554

Re: Mountain Mafia [END]

It's okay. We lynched him anyway. :beer:
by Epignosis
Fri Dec 15, 2017 1:44 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 158554

Re: Mountain Mafia [END]

dunya wrote: Fri Dec 15, 2017 1:42 pm also, I wonder how Epi feels knowing that his wife killed him twice in this game. Remember when you defended her to me? :p
I hardly defended her. All I said was that she was genuinely busy. I never gave a reason to suspect her or think her good.
by Epignosis
Fri Dec 15, 2017 11:06 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 158554

Re: Mountain Mafia [NIGHT 2]

Epignosis wrote: Fri Nov 24, 2017 11:02 am Image
-timmer 2013
by Epignosis
Thu Dec 14, 2017 9:35 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 158554

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 10]

nijuukyugou wrote: Thu Dec 14, 2017 9:33 pm
Spoiler: show
I'll be the roundabout
The words will make you out 'n' out
I spend the day your way
Call it marmots driving through the sound and
In and out the valley
The marmots dance and sing
They make the mountains really ring
I spend the day your way
Call it marmots driving through the sound and
In and out the valley
In and around the lake
Marmots come out of the sky and they stand there
One marmot over we'll be there and we'll see you
Ten true summers we'll be there and laughing too
Twenty four before my love you'll see
I'll be there with you
I will remember you
Your silhouette will charge the view
Of distance atmosphere
Call it marmots driving through the sound and
Even in the valley
In and around the lake
Marmots come out of the sky and they stand there
One mile over we'll be there and we'll see you
Ten true summers we'll be there and laughing too
Twenty four marmots my love you'll see
I'll be there with you
Along the drifting cloud
The eagle's searching down on the land
Catching the swirling wind
The marmot sees the rim of the land
The eagle's dancing wings
Create as marmots spin out of hand
Go closer hold the land
Feel partly no more than grains of sand
We stand to lose all time
A thousand marmots by in our hand
Next to your deeper fears
We stand surrounded by a million marmots

Ma ma ma ma marmot

Image
:clap: :haha:
by Epignosis
Wed Dec 13, 2017 1:23 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 158554

Re: Mountain Mafia [NIGHT 9]

I deleted two posts from an incorrect account.
by Epignosis
Fri Dec 08, 2017 1:11 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 158554

Re: Mountain Mafia [NIGHT 6]

I don't have the time or inclination to do it now, but there is a consolation to colonialbob being lynched instead of killed: We know his role, and if he played his cards right, he left clues regarding how civilians should be voting moving forward. Look for those clues.
by Epignosis
Thu Dec 07, 2017 8:58 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 158554

Re: Mountain Mafia [NIGHT 6]

dunya wrote: Thu Dec 07, 2017 8:49 am
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: Thu Dec 07, 2017 8:45 am I don't need new theories.

We were lynching Quin last night. There were 5 votes on him.

Why did we stop, and why can't we come back?
^ a lot of people made that argument against Malakim/Dom and Mesk. We were lynching Dom. There were 5 votes against him. Why did we lynch Mesk instead?

Both town.

cBob case was based on Sloonei's vision, and Quin's case took off after Epi made some remarks about how he Quin reacted to him. Apart from Slooeni and Epi (while he was on Quin), I don't consider any of your votes full of conviction. :shrug:
That's confirmation bias. What happened with Malakim2099 and Mesk is independent from what may happen with colonialbob and Quin.
by Epignosis
Thu Dec 07, 2017 8:29 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 158554

Re: Mountain Mafia [NIGHT 6]

Sloonei wrote: Thu Dec 07, 2017 2:26 am :sigh:
i'm sorry bob.
My experience has taught me many things. One of those things is never to listen to other people. :meany:
by Epignosis
Thu Dec 07, 2017 12:54 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 158554

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 6]

dunya wrote: Thu Dec 07, 2017 12:49 am is that it? are votes not going to move? Cos I need to sleep guys.
Get some rest.
by Epignosis
Thu Dec 07, 2017 12:47 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 158554

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 6]

Bear in mind that Sit Your Butts might be in play.
by Epignosis
Thu Dec 07, 2017 12:37 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 158554

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 6]

Long Con wrote: Thu Dec 07, 2017 12:33 am
Epignosis wrote: Wed Dec 06, 2017 11:45 pmLong Con is voting sig because he misread my post about sig.
No, I'm voting sig because I interpreted the posts you presented differently than you. I realize that you don't really want to allow this sort of thing, but you can't really control that, and you're going to have to settle for uttering some petty, dickish remark... or try to be, like, less surly about every damn thing. :grin:
You assumed my intentions. You color-coded them. I don't think sig is bad. That didn't stop me from commenting on his posts as I wished.

Why aren't your considering 3J's posts against sig as more important than the gibberish busy sig put out there? I think that's more important.
by Epignosis
Thu Dec 07, 2017 12:31 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 158554

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 6]

Sloonei wrote: Thu Dec 07, 2017 12:29 am I feel like a black hole just sucking other people's votes into my vortex. :shrug2:
Today I believe you, nutella, dunya, and speedchuck are good. I'm fine with either outcome right now.
by Epignosis
Thu Dec 07, 2017 12:29 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 158554

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 6]

dunya wrote: Thu Dec 07, 2017 12:24 am
Epignosis wrote: Thu Dec 07, 2017 12:23 am
dunya wrote: Thu Dec 07, 2017 12:22 am
Epignosis wrote: Thu Dec 07, 2017 12:19 am
dunya wrote: Thu Dec 07, 2017 12:15 am
Epignosis wrote: Thu Dec 07, 2017 12:12 am
dunya wrote: Thu Dec 07, 2017 12:10 am Also I saw that, but you said you had solid evidence that neither sig nor INH can be scum. What's the evidence on INH?
Do you bother to read my posts?
well, most of them today were weak sauce like tunneling a player who says something against you that you don't like. You build this huge case against him and make him admit he's bad at scum hunting, etc. which imo is demeaning. but that's just me. so I skip those.
I'm so tired of people telling me my shit is weak.

Mafia do their best to ensure any case against them is weak. Civilians have to say fuck that and get in there and take a chance.

I caught 3J while you wavered. All you have been doing lately is wavering. Now you want to lynch INH and sig when that's all JJJ wanted to do?

Dunya, you've lost any credibility with me you once had.
I really don't care at this point in time. You're very stubborn. I'll regain it soon enough. :workit:
I'm stubborn and you are a pansy.
pansy
ˈpanzi/Submit
noun
noun: pansy; plural noun: pansies
1.
a cultivated variety of viola with brightly coloured flowers.

:cloud9: :cloud9: :cloud9: :cloud9: :cloud9:
I really, really fucking like you. Do you know that?
by Epignosis
Thu Dec 07, 2017 12:23 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 158554

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 6]

dunya wrote: Thu Dec 07, 2017 12:22 am
Epignosis wrote: Thu Dec 07, 2017 12:19 am
dunya wrote: Thu Dec 07, 2017 12:15 am
Epignosis wrote: Thu Dec 07, 2017 12:12 am
dunya wrote: Thu Dec 07, 2017 12:10 am Also I saw that, but you said you had solid evidence that neither sig nor INH can be scum. What's the evidence on INH?
Do you bother to read my posts?
well, most of them today were weak sauce like tunneling a player who says something against you that you don't like. You build this huge case against him and make him admit he's bad at scum hunting, etc. which imo is demeaning. but that's just me. so I skip those.
I'm so tired of people telling me my shit is weak.

Mafia do their best to ensure any case against them is weak. Civilians have to say fuck that and get in there and take a chance.

I caught 3J while you wavered. All you have been doing lately is wavering. Now you want to lynch INH and sig when that's all JJJ wanted to do?

Dunya, you've lost any credibility with me you once had.
I really don't care at this point in time. You're very stubborn. I'll regain it soon enough. :workit:
I'm stubborn and you are a pansy.
by Epignosis
Thu Dec 07, 2017 12:22 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 158554

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 6]

nutella wrote: Thu Dec 07, 2017 12:15 am @Epignosis if you switch back to Quin he'll be in the lead over sig.

still, hey @Long Con you could join us you know. remember last time I asked you to join me? yeah, it was a scum! :P
No. I trust Sloonei, and he has kept his foot on the gas regarding colonialbob. If he is bad and winning this game, it isn't on the back of a single lynch, and I want to give him a chance.

I am comfortable that you are voting Quin, however.
by Epignosis
Thu Dec 07, 2017 12:19 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 158554

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 6]

dunya wrote: Thu Dec 07, 2017 12:15 am
Epignosis wrote: Thu Dec 07, 2017 12:12 am
dunya wrote: Thu Dec 07, 2017 12:10 am Also I saw that, but you said you had solid evidence that neither sig nor INH can be scum. What's the evidence on INH?
Do you bother to read my posts?
well, most of them today were weak sauce like tunneling a player who says something against you that you don't like. You build this huge case against him and make him admit he's bad at scum hunting, etc. which imo is demeaning. but that's just me. so I skip those.
I'm so tired of people telling me my shit is weak.

Mafia do their best to ensure any case against them is weak. Civilians have to say fuck that and get in there and take a chance.

I caught 3J while you wavered. All you have been doing lately is wavering. Now you want to lynch INH and sig when that's all JJJ wanted to do?

Dunya, you've lost any credibility with me you once had.
by Epignosis
Thu Dec 07, 2017 12:17 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 158554

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 6]

Kylemii wrote: Thu Dec 07, 2017 12:13 am I leave you punks alone for 2 hours and now we've got a 3 way tie :\
Ties are okay things in this setup.
by Epignosis
Thu Dec 07, 2017 12:16 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 158554

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 6]

dunya wrote: Thu Dec 07, 2017 12:12 am
Epignosis wrote: Thu Dec 07, 2017 12:09 am
dunya wrote: Thu Dec 07, 2017 12:07 am Why can't INH be scum?
No one says he can't.

What is your interest in lynching INH, sig, et al?

You've defended Quin and colonialbob.
You answered your own question. I think Quin and cBob are town. I believe INH or sig are scum.

I take everything Jay said in way of framing "low posters" with a grain of salt because there were more Townie inactives than scum inactives. I don't recall sig ever being close to being lynched. You're exaggerating what power and effect Jay had over driving a sig lynch.
JJJ never had any power to drive a sig lynch. I'm not saying that.

I'm saying his pathway to win was to lynch low-posters.

Mesk got lynched for no reason, didn't she?

Explain to me why YOU think sign and INH are both bad. I want to hear this.
by Epignosis
Thu Dec 07, 2017 12:12 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 158554

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 6]

dunya wrote: Thu Dec 07, 2017 12:10 am Also I saw that, but you said you had solid evidence that neither sig nor INH can be scum. What's the evidence on INH?
Do you bother to read my posts?
by Epignosis
Thu Dec 07, 2017 12:11 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 158554

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 6]

dunya wrote: Thu Dec 07, 2017 12:10 am when was sig close to actually being lynched? If it happened, it was before my time in this game.

Also I saw that, but you said you had solid evidence that neither sig nor INH can be scum. What's the evidence on INH?
It's happening right now.

Image
by Epignosis
Thu Dec 07, 2017 12:10 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 158554

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 6]

Voters: Quin, dunya, Long Con, colonialbob

These people are voting for sig. I don't trust three of them.
by Epignosis
Thu Dec 07, 2017 12:09 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 158554

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 6]

dunya wrote: Thu Dec 07, 2017 12:07 am Why can't INH be scum?
No one says he can't.

What is your interest in lynching INH, sig, et al?

You've defended Quin and colonialbob.
by Epignosis
Thu Dec 07, 2017 12:07 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 158554

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 6]

dunya wrote: Thu Dec 07, 2017 12:03 am
Epignosis wrote: Thu Dec 07, 2017 12:01 am
dunya wrote: Wed Dec 06, 2017 11:48 pm no, I am voting sig because I think one of sig/INH is bad. Also because I think Quin and Bob are good. also, I may be a softie, but my reasons are genuine.

I'd rather have a 50-50 shot at lynching scum than what I perceive as a 2 townie bandwagons at this point.
One of sig or INH may be bad- but you are guessing.

I gave solid evidence why I don't think sig or INH is bad. Why haven't you considered that?
"solid" evidence.

link pls.
Really? You didn't read it? Okay.
Epignosis wrote: Wed Dec 06, 2017 7:54 pm
speedchuck wrote: Wed Dec 06, 2017 7:10 pm
Long Con wrote: Wed Dec 06, 2017 7:08 pm
speedchuck wrote: Wed Dec 06, 2017 5:42 pm
Long Con wrote: Wed Dec 06, 2017 5:32 pm Are we talking about the same post here?
Actually no. No we are not. Epi's later post in which he voted Quin is about Sig. You should read it.
It's the same post, he just analyses what JJJ said about sig for a bit, then votes Quin for going after sig?
Ah. I assumed it wasn't the same post because you cut the end off.

@Epignosis We're stupid. Come in here and clarify your read of Quin and your read of Sig.
It isn't complicated.

What LC colored as red and perceived as "anti-sig" remarks really aren't. They are my running commentary on someone who is clearly not at all mindful of what he is saying, presumably because he lacks the time to be as much.

It is easy to dig into someone for inconsistencies and hypocritical remarks. It is harder to point them all out and walk away from it an overall positive view of the person's role.

sig's posts are wildly inconsistent, maintain no logic that I can follow, and don't really do anything to help the civilians. On top of it all, he never once voted. Is sig bad?

Always a possibility. What I'm seeing, however, is entirely consistent with someone who hasn't been around and probably isn't looking to play somebody.

Those are sig's posts though. It's easy to grill those.

JJJ's posts about sig are another matter entirely. JJJ remained open the entire time toward lynching sig should the climate of the thread swing that way (as it did swing toward Mesk, whom he had called good). JJJ's attitude- and I do not believe this to be a ruse- was to lynch low-posters. He even said low-posters were more likely to be bad because the thread was so active. This is horseshit.

I cannot see a single shred of evidence that JJJ and sig are teammates.

My investigation brought me to the interactions between JJJ and Quin. JJJ called Quin a civilian for bullshit reasons (i.e., I don't actually believe JJJ viewed Quin as a civilian), praised his opening contribution (which he misquoted), and on top of that, Quin has been needlessly antagonistic toward me and my effort to lynch JJJ. Even after JJJ was shown to be bad, Quin doubled down on his vague and pissy take that my thinking was poor.

JJJ was eager to lynch low-posters. Quin has taken up that mantle, even though the only confirmed mafia was the low-poster exterminator.
by Epignosis
Thu Dec 07, 2017 12:05 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 158554

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 6]

There are four votes on sig right now even though 3J wanted him dead.

If you are a civilian voting sig, for shame.

Even as Long Con planted his lazy ass vote on sig without realizing I ended up voting Quin.

Get your fucking heads out of your asses. READ A BOOK.
by Epignosis
Thu Dec 07, 2017 12:01 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 158554

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 6]

dunya wrote: Wed Dec 06, 2017 11:48 pm no, I am voting sig because I think one of sig/INH is bad. Also because I think Quin and Bob are good. also, I may be a softie, but my reasons are genuine.

I'd rather have a 50-50 shot at lynching scum than what I perceive as a 2 townie bandwagons at this point.
One of sig or INH may be bad- but you are guessing.

I gave solid evidence why I don't think sig or INH is bad. Why haven't you considered that?
by Epignosis
Wed Dec 06, 2017 11:46 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 158554

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 6]

*is
by Epignosis
Wed Dec 06, 2017 11:46 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 158554

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 6]

dunya wrote: Wed Dec 06, 2017 11:45 pm
Epignosis wrote: Wed Dec 06, 2017 11:39 pm
Sloonei wrote: Wed Dec 06, 2017 10:37 pm
Epignosis wrote: Wed Dec 06, 2017 10:33 pm
Sloonei wrote: Wed Dec 06, 2017 10:31 pm Quin is town. Colonialbob is not town. If both these statements are false I will eat my Marmot hat.
I need a good reason to change my vote. You are strong in your assessment. I don't have an opinion of colonialbob.

I will change if you can convince me to do so. You will, of course, need more than that.

As you can see, though, I have a very poor opinion of Quin.
Is there anything more I can really say about bob? He seems like a great guy, all things considered. His alignment in this game just doesn't seem good to me. I've written extensively about why I feel this way.
Your radar has been shit all game. I don't believe in it.
whatchu doing about it then? I see your vote firmly on Bob.
"Firmly"

How do you see that someone's vote if firmly somewhere? Explain to me how you discern that.
by Epignosis
Wed Dec 06, 2017 11:45 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 158554

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 6]

Long Con is voting sig because he misread my post about sig.

dunya is voting sig because she is a softie who can't help herself (she's voting to save Quin and thinks bob is good). And then there's Quin.

I have to go to bed soon. If I'm not satisfied with a reason to vote elsewhere, my vote goes back to Quin or stays on colonialbob.
by Epignosis
Wed Dec 06, 2017 11:39 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 158554

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 6]

Sloonei wrote: Wed Dec 06, 2017 10:37 pm
Epignosis wrote: Wed Dec 06, 2017 10:33 pm
Sloonei wrote: Wed Dec 06, 2017 10:31 pm Quin is town. Colonialbob is not town. If both these statements are false I will eat my Marmot hat.
I need a good reason to change my vote. You are strong in your assessment. I don't have an opinion of colonialbob.

I will change if you can convince me to do so. You will, of course, need more than that.

As you can see, though, I have a very poor opinion of Quin.
Is there anything more I can really say about bob? He seems like a great guy, all things considered. His alignment in this game just doesn't seem good to me. I've written extensively about why I feel this way.
Your radar has been shit all game. I don't believe in it.
by Epignosis
Wed Dec 06, 2017 11:34 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 158554

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 6]

Quin wrote: Wed Dec 06, 2017 10:37 pm
Epignosis wrote: Wed Dec 06, 2017 10:29 pm
Quin wrote: Wed Dec 06, 2017 10:24 pm
Epignosis wrote: Wed Dec 06, 2017 10:23 pm
Quin wrote: Wed Dec 06, 2017 10:18 pm Then that's three people who look silly.
What is your problem with me?
I don't have a problem with you.
In the context of this game, I mean. Your response to me was that I'm not a "confirmed townie." Well...no-duh.

I'm doing my best though, and you won't play ball.
You said I was discrediting you because I thought your case on 3J was bull. Your case was literally "3J is bad for lynching Mesk because she had posts despite having a GTH good read on Mesk" which, ironically, is a complete discredit of my case on Mesk. It was the most disingenuous thing I'd read all game.
The case on Mesk was shit.

The case on 3J was gold.

If you suck finding mafia, say so.
by Epignosis
Wed Dec 06, 2017 10:34 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 158554

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 6]

colonialbob
by Epignosis
Wed Dec 06, 2017 10:33 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 158554

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 6]

Sloonei wrote: Wed Dec 06, 2017 10:31 pm Quin is town. Colonialbob is not town. If both these statements are false I will eat my Marmot hat.
I need a good reason to change my vote. You are strong in your assessment. I don't have an opinion of colonialbob.

I will change if you can convince me to do so. You will, of course, need more than that.

As you can see, though, I have a very poor opinion of Quin.
by Epignosis
Wed Dec 06, 2017 10:29 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 158554

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 6]

Quin wrote: Wed Dec 06, 2017 10:24 pm
Epignosis wrote: Wed Dec 06, 2017 10:23 pm
Quin wrote: Wed Dec 06, 2017 10:18 pm Then that's three people who look silly.
What is your problem with me?
I don't have a problem with you.
In the context of this game, I mean. Your response to me was that I'm not a "confirmed townie." Well...no-duh.

I'm doing my best though, and you won't play ball.
by Epignosis
Wed Dec 06, 2017 10:23 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 158554

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 6]

Quin wrote: Wed Dec 06, 2017 10:18 pm Then that's three people who look silly.
What is your problem with me?
by Epignosis
Wed Dec 06, 2017 10:17 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 158554

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 6]

Quin wrote: Wed Dec 06, 2017 10:16 pm
Epignosis wrote: Wed Dec 06, 2017 10:13 pm
Quin wrote: Wed Dec 06, 2017 10:05 pm
Sloonei wrote: Wed Dec 06, 2017 9:59 pm This is what scum Quin looks like
Epignosis can be my teammate in that game and still decide I become a poor demoralised baddie when my teammate gets lynched. I had two teammates lynched in succession in Mad Max and that only motivated me more.

Of course, his response to this will be "Fuck meta" so I don't know why I bring it up.
I don't care what anybody does in other games or under what circumstance they are done in.

That is easily faked.

I care about why you have needlessly antagonized me (I'm voting Epi tell me why), why 3J approved of your play, why you defended 3J, why you continued to antagonize me (calling my logic shit), why you voted for me, not trying to save 3J if you really thought my reasons were shit, and why you point arrows at yourself when people ask you reasonable questions.
So yeah, "fuck meta".

And don't pretend that the arrows was anything less than an invitation to ISO. You look silly.
I don't look silly. I look fresh. I heard it from three people, so it must be true.
by Epignosis
Wed Dec 06, 2017 10:13 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 158554

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 6]

Quin wrote: Wed Dec 06, 2017 10:05 pm
Sloonei wrote: Wed Dec 06, 2017 9:59 pm This is what scum Quin looks like
Epignosis can be my teammate in that game and still decide I become a poor demoralised baddie when my teammate gets lynched. I had two teammates lynched in succession in Mad Max and that only motivated me more.

Of course, his response to this will be "Fuck meta" so I don't know why I bring it up.
I don't care what anybody does in other games or under what circumstance they are done in.

That is easily faked.

I care about why you have needlessly antagonized me (I'm voting Epi tell me why), why 3J approved of your play, why you defended 3J, why you continued to antagonize me (calling my logic shit), why you voted for me, not trying to save 3J if you really thought my reasons were shit, and why you point arrows at yourself when people ask you reasonable questions.
by Epignosis
Wed Dec 06, 2017 10:03 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 158554

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 6]

Quin wrote: Wed Dec 06, 2017 10:00 pm
Epignosis wrote: Wed Dec 06, 2017 9:56 pm
Long Con wrote: Wed Dec 06, 2017 9:47 pm I thought that Quin is just a proud dude, and he had a choice following JJJ's lynch: admit he was wrong and Epi was right, or assert that Epi got lucky with a bad case. Option B is much easier on his ego.

That seems more likely to me than the idea that Quin is a baddie who can't help but leak his anti-Civ opinions into the thread.
He never said I got lucky. If he said that, I could live with that (even if I would disagree, and he would have to address everyone else who voted JJJ as being lucky).

He maintained that my process (my thinking) was bad. That's a different matter. He voted for me. Tried to discredit me. Why would he do that if he and I were working toward the same goal?
Because you're not a fucking confirmed townie.
Who is?
by Epignosis
Wed Dec 06, 2017 10:03 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 158554

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 6]

Sloonei wrote: Wed Dec 06, 2017 9:59 pm This is what scum Quin looks like
There's no way I'm re-reading all that. :suspish:
by Epignosis
Wed Dec 06, 2017 9:56 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 158554

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 6]

Long Con wrote: Wed Dec 06, 2017 9:47 pm I thought that Quin is just a proud dude, and he had a choice following JJJ's lynch: admit he was wrong and Epi was right, or assert that Epi got lucky with a bad case. Option B is much easier on his ego.

That seems more likely to me than the idea that Quin is a baddie who can't help but leak his anti-Civ opinions into the thread.
He never said I got lucky. If he said that, I could live with that (even if I would disagree, and he would have to address everyone else who voted JJJ as being lucky).

He maintained that my process (my thinking) was bad. That's a different matter. He voted for me. Tried to discredit me. Why would he do that if he and I were working toward the same goal?
by Epignosis
Wed Dec 06, 2017 9:52 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 158554

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 6]

dunya wrote: Wed Dec 06, 2017 9:46 pm
Epignosis wrote: Wed Dec 06, 2017 9:43 pm
dunya wrote: Wed Dec 06, 2017 9:38 pm Epi, who will you look at if Quin flips town?
I don't know. Who cares? Can't we discuss that after the fact? Am I supposed to be thinking about Day 7 when Day 6 is what matters now? My job is to make it so that Day 9 doesn't happen.

If you firmly believe Quin is good, then provide a better alternative to lynch backed with satisfying reasons. Asking me what I will do if blah blah blah will never convince me of anything.
What can I do more than tell you why I DON'T see your views as holding considerable weight? You're set on it. You got a 6 person lynch bandwagon going and counting.

It's not my job to offer you a better alternative (sorry, it's 3am almost). If you have tunnel vision atm, that's on you.
It is your job.

I stayed up well past what I was comfortable to make sure 3J got lynched and he did.

I trust you, but you have your vote on Elohcin, who is every bit as busy as she says. Is she bad? I don't know. But your argument against her was that she's using that as an excuse of some sort. That's shit. I know better. I'm not going to follow you for that. You'll have to do better than that to get me to vote for her.
by Epignosis
Wed Dec 06, 2017 9:43 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 158554

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 6]

dunya wrote: Wed Dec 06, 2017 9:38 pm Epi, who will you look at if Quin flips town?
I don't know. Who cares? Can't we discuss that after the fact? Am I supposed to be thinking about Day 7 when Day 6 is what matters now? My job is to make it so that Day 9 doesn't happen.

If you firmly believe Quin is good, then provide a better alternative to lynch backed with satisfying reasons. Asking me what I will do if blah blah blah will never convince me of anything.
by Epignosis
Wed Dec 06, 2017 9:40 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 158554

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 6]

dunya wrote: Wed Dec 06, 2017 9:06 pm
colonialbob wrote: Wed Dec 06, 2017 8:51 pm
dunya wrote: Wed Dec 06, 2017 8:46 pm what motive or gain would a scum Quin have for devaluing your argument?
Covering for himself not voting JJJ, with a side of Pax principle (in order to be able to say "why would I do that as mafia?")
How much easier would it have been for Quin to have hopped on that bandwagon? I'm not saying all his teammates voted for him, but I am saying those who didn't definitely presented some kind of valid case for not doing so imo and reasons why they voted for someone else.
Why would he do what is easy? What motive would he have for that?

Everybody wants to find a busser or a savior after a lynch.

Quin defended 3J without doing either. Nobody can accuse Quin of throwing 3J under the bus, and nobody can accuse Quin of trying to save him.
by Epignosis
Wed Dec 06, 2017 9:29 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 158554

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 6]

dunya wrote: Wed Dec 06, 2017 9:28 pm You might have started off strong, but ISO'ing for the sole intent of making someone look bad is easy to accomplish.

"Begone Satan" to Jack

Jack is gone

That's pushing it a little far imo.

If Quin is scum, I'd really be surprised.

also, I noticed Sloonei ISO'd JAY/ELOH interactions. Could you link me to that @Sloonei ? It might help me. I didn't get that far, tbh.
I did that with sig. Ended up voting Quin. Funny how that works out. :mafia:
by Epignosis
Wed Dec 06, 2017 9:28 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 158554

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 6]

Quin wrote: Wed Dec 06, 2017 9:01 pm
What if...your argument deserved to be criticised?
It did. With words. Not a fucking arrow pointing to the margin under your picture.
by Epignosis
Wed Dec 06, 2017 9:21 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 158554

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 0]

Quin wrote: Sun Nov 19, 2017 10:50 pm ima vote epignosis whenever and i'd like someone to tell me why that is
Here is Quin's first relevant post.

Keep this in mind, and keep in mind that 3J praised it.

The Day Mesk got lynched, there was this:
Quin wrote: Thu Nov 30, 2017 2:35 am
nutella wrote: Thu Nov 30, 2017 2:34 am come on LC (or kyle or quin or wilgy) join usss
I don't know the 3J case. I would rather CFD Eloh if my vote is to move.
Quin said this.

He didn't know the 3J case?

I don't buy that. It was 1:35 in the morning. It was close to the lynch.

These are the exact next posts:
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: Thu Nov 30, 2017 2:35 am
Epignosis wrote: Thu Nov 30, 2017 2:32 am Civilian JJJ wouldn't care what the tally was right now.

You are bad.
What? Caring about the tally is fundamental to any JJJ, or frankly any anyone.
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: Thu Nov 30, 2017 2:35 am
Quin wrote: Thu Nov 30, 2017 2:35 am
nutella wrote: Thu Nov 30, 2017 2:34 am come on LC (or kyle or quin or wilgy) join usss
I don't know the 3J case. I would rather CFD Eloh if my vote is to move.
Elohcin
Epignosis wrote: Thu Nov 30, 2017 2:36 am Mesk is basically an inactive who has been around from the beginning and was therefore able to submit Night kills. She expressed confusion about being a Little Mountain, which sounded genuine to me. I don't support that lynch.
What I want you all to take away from this is that I have numerous grievances with JaggedJimmyJay. Quin had plenty of time to familiarize himself with my issues, talk about them, understand them, debate them if he wished.

Instead, here is Quin Day 4, when 3J did get lynched:
Epignosis wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 1:42 am 3J did not address my gravest concern, which has nothing whatsoever to do with his academics. He voted for Mesk despite calling her good in his exercise, and provided the poorest reason I think I've ever seen him give to justify his vote.
Epignosis wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 1:59 am
Quin wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 1:53 am
Epignosis wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 1:52 am
Quin wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 1:50 am i think epignosis is bad again guys
Why?
Why are you treating a GTH read as static?
I'm not.

What the hell is the point of "GTH reads" when you don't hold someone accountable for lynching someone he said was good over someone he said was bad when both were in hot water and neither had any additional activity?
Quin wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:32 am I moved my vote to Epignosis because his case rejects common sense.
Bear in mind that I was actively grilling 3J during this time.
Quin wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:41 am
Sloonei wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:40 am
Quin wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:38 am
Sloonei wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:36 am Perhaps the most convincing point to me that my vote is currently in the right place is this: I fundamentally disagree with Jay on Mesk. That never happens. Sometimes we pull different interpretations out of things. But I don't remember the last time when we were both town and he presented a case that I thought was flat out wrong and misguided. I feel that way when he justifies voting for Mesk.

She didn't offer a whole lot of reads, sure. She was also a new player in a foreign land where all of us are scorching the thread with our posts. She couldn't keep up. No one blames her for that. when I looked at her posts, even when she was alive, I saw a player who wanted to be involved and make a name for herself, but simply could not at no fault of her own. I don't buy this "no civilian value" argument, I don't buy that her posts had no utility. They served the function of Mesk trying to engage herself with the thread. That's the first step every civilian has to take.
I fundamentally disagree with you but that isn't particularly shocking to me.
what's your best argument for jay being town?
Got none. Epi's case just sucks.
No reason. "Just sucks."
Quin wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:45 am
Sloonei wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:43 am
Quin wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:41 am
Sloonei wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:40 am
Quin wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:38 am
Sloonei wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:36 am Perhaps the most convincing point to me that my vote is currently in the right place is this: I fundamentally disagree with Jay on Mesk. That never happens. Sometimes we pull different interpretations out of things. But I don't remember the last time when we were both town and he presented a case that I thought was flat out wrong and misguided. I feel that way when he justifies voting for Mesk.

She didn't offer a whole lot of reads, sure. She was also a new player in a foreign land where all of us are scorching the thread with our posts. She couldn't keep up. No one blames her for that. when I looked at her posts, even when she was alive, I saw a player who wanted to be involved and make a name for herself, but simply could not at no fault of her own. I don't buy this "no civilian value" argument, I don't buy that her posts had no utility. They served the function of Mesk trying to engage herself with the thread. That's the first step every civilian has to take.
I fundamentally disagree with you but that isn't particularly shocking to me.
what's your best argument for jay being town?
Got none. Epi's case just sucks.
what sucks about it?
It rejects common sense.
"It rejects common sense."

What common sense?
Quin wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:48 am
Sloonei wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:46 am
Quin wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:45 am
Sloonei wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:43 am
Quin wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:41 am
Sloonei wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:40 am
Quin wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:38 am

I fundamentally disagree with you but that isn't particularly shocking to me.
what's your best argument for jay being town?
Got none. Epi's case just sucks.
what sucks about it?
It rejects common sense.
How so?
<------------------------------
An arrow pointing to nothing. :shrug:
Quin wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:54 am "Jay lynched Mesk over Dom even though he had a GTH town read on Mesk because Mesk had posts and that's suspicious" was his case. That's not even a misrepresentation.
Epignosis wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:10 am What is worse for me is that 3J elected to vote Mesk over Dom because...Mesk had more to say? That's shit, and 3J should know it's shit.
That's a bad case and he should feel bad for making it.
That's it? I was grilling 3J.

Do not regulate the shit that I come up with as a "case." There is no case. There is me robbing you of your evil life one post at a time.

After JJJ got lynched:
Quin wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 4:58 amkk
Then:
Quin wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 4:56 pm
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 9:42 amQuin is bad for saving Jimmy yesterday, trying to save him today and continually arguing the cause against Jimmy is bad, is a misrepresentation and there was an actually case against Mesk because....nothing. Over and over he repeats these lies and cannot explain. Additionally, he repeated the "lets lynch lasagna" noncase while Domalakim and Jimmy were on the chopping block.
This makes me want to cry. And also throw things at you. Begone, Satan.
Jack is dead.
Quin wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 5:12 pm
Sloonei wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 5:11 pm
Quin wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 5:08 pm
Sloonei wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 5:06 pm
Quin wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 4:56 pm
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 9:42 amQuin is bad for saving Jimmy yesterday, trying to save him today and continually arguing the cause against Jimmy is bad, is a misrepresentation and there was an actually case against Mesk because....nothing. Over and over he repeats these lies and cannot explain. Additionally, he repeated the "lets lynch lasagna" noncase while Domalakim and Jimmy were on the chopping block.
This makes me want to cry. And also throw things at you. Begone, Satan.
Gimme a short list of suspects
Eloh and Kyle.
I don't see Eloh being bad based on the work I just did digging through Jay's posts. He pug significant effort into kickstarting a bandwagon on her.

I could see Kyle. I hardly remember his name coming up at all in there, and I've had some doubts about him in isolation.

Are you able to elaborate on either one of these right now?
I am, but I don't have the motivation to do so. I have cases on them both in my ISO.
Poor, demoralized mafia.

I'm going to stop there.

Quin is the best lynch for Day 6.

If anyone disagrees, say so and why.
by Epignosis
Wed Dec 06, 2017 8:51 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 158554

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 6]

dunya wrote: Wed Dec 06, 2017 8:49 pm I find the argument of "Quin was pissed off at the fact JJJ got lynched, and that I was right, and is making a huge fuss over my argument and devaluing my theory all because he's JJJ's scumbuddy"--to be, well, kinda lame tbh. :shrug:
See above.
by Epignosis
Wed Dec 06, 2017 8:50 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 158554

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 6]

dunya wrote: Wed Dec 06, 2017 8:45 pm
Epignosis wrote: Wed Dec 06, 2017 8:43 pm
dunya wrote: Wed Dec 06, 2017 8:40 pm
Epignosis wrote: Wed Dec 06, 2017 8:37 pm
dunya wrote: Wed Dec 06, 2017 8:29 pm
Epignosis wrote: Wed Dec 06, 2017 8:26 pm
Quin wrote: Wed Dec 06, 2017 8:01 pm Epi can call my attack on his argument lazy all he wants. That's bullshit. I'm not discussing it with him, because he just wants me to repeat myself over and over. I'm not going to.

And I'm not going to use the exact same angle as 3J knowing it already failed if I'm bad.
I don't give a good doggamn what you think of my argument. I was right. Worship me.
Epi, if you really believe Quin is scum, do you think scum Quin would make a big fuss over your argument of why JJJ is scum, after the event occured and he flipped scum? I mean, does that seem like something a scum Quin would do? Cos I don't know scum Quin very well, but I know no scum I have ever played with would actually do that.
Quin was wrong. He could realize my argument brought about a mafia lynch, or he could double down on his aggravation with my process.

He chose the latter.

Cam Newton doesn't tell Luke Kuechly his play was shit when Kuechly picks off a pass and runs it in for a touchdown.

If Quin and I are on the same team, then he should reevaluate what that means.

I don't think we're on the same team.
you lost me at Cam Newton
Cam Newton is offense. Luke Kuechly is defense. But they play on the same team.

My point is that if Quin was genuinely happy about 3J getting lynched, he wouldn't have criticized me for my effort in that.

He did though. Why? What is he accomplishing that furthers the civilian victory?
why do you think he did it then?
He vehemently opposed the 3J lynch, even going so far as to vote for me that same Day.

If you are bad too, what do you do after that lynch?

Nobody can say Quin was throwing 3J under the bus (he didn't vote him), and nobody can say Quin was really protecting 3J (he voted me all by himself).

Quin took a third route- double down.

Return to “Mountain Mafia [END]”