Return to “[ENDGAME] Bullets Over Broadway Mafia”
No, we won't be counting on that. I suggest you rethink that manner of expressing your dissatisfaction, because if you follow through with your "lesson," we won't be hearing from you here.XthAtGAm3RGuYX wrote:If that ever happens to me again I will explicitly ruin a game to make a lesson out of it. Count on that.
You used empty rhetoric ("I find the MP / Epi thing interesting and would like to see how that plays out.")Long Con wrote:The Flash win was one of the most impressive wins in Mafia history, to be quite honest and to toot our own horn. A baddie team that won without a kill.FZ. wrote:If it makes you feel better, I get killed almost every game, and never win when it happens.But I feel bad for you knowing that every time you put so much into being a civ, you end up losing late in the game. This is Flash all over. The annoying part is, we did take out all the active mafia players. It's hard to judge players who substitute a non active player so late in the game. In my opinion, the Flash win was more impressive.
Next to impossible.
I don't know why Webber killed Epi on Night 1, but we tried to kill him on Night 2 because he was after me hard on a whim on Day 1, and we were happy to see him go because of it. Only some crazy random happenstance allowed him to keep breathing on Day 3 and beyond. If Epi wants to survive longer, the first step would be not to come after Long Con hard for no real reason on Day 1.Epi, I don't know why they NK you. The difference between your first and second version was striking. I thought you did a good job making sure it was obvious.People die for that. Good to know for the future.
Mafia can't win without kills. That was insane.Golden wrote:What I want to know is how all the survivals came about?
I did. Found out nijuu was SS. Basically a bonus search for me. Figured I had a win in the bag.Golden wrote:Oh, did you win the role check?Epignosis wrote:I argued with the host and made my case on one of them.Golden wrote:@SVS - I googled hard and it was still very close to impossible.
I argued with the host and made my case on one of them.Golden wrote:@SVS - I googled hard and it was still very close to impossible.
You said I had to survive to win. I knew that wasn't going to happen.Dom wrote:FYI, I was expecting research. I was hoping people would learn something from it.S~V~S wrote:I felt so bad when you made your vote post, Ninja, if it is any consolation. All day long i was sure i was gonna die, and then you voted for Daisy and I felt really crappy, lol, although I was also like *YES!!*
Linki~ those questions were so hard, i thought I would be a fail, so I did not submit since i would have had to Google to do so, and that would be not cool imo.
You played admirably. You just needed to target your lyricists. :/Epignosis wrote:All I needed was the damn role check. And I got killed anyway. Thanks for nothing fingersplints.Dom wrote:I want to say how much I appreciate your effort into this game NJU despite losing! You were amazing and JUST barely lost. I loved every single re-write you did and I sent them to my musical theater friends. ^_^
I appreciate everyone who put effort into this game. I loved hosting you.
I also want to say that there was a third prize STILL available from trivia and it would have really changed the game. It was the mystery prize, and I'm shocked no one took it. It was basically, a "what do you want for a prize? propose something and i'll consider it" prize. That could have utterly changed the game.
All I needed was the damn role check. And I got killed anyway. Thanks for nothing fingersplints.Dom wrote:I want to say how much I appreciate your effort into this game NJU despite losing! You were amazing and JUST barely lost. I loved every single re-write you did and I sent them to my musical theater friends. ^_^
I appreciate everyone who put effort into this game. I loved hosting you.
I also want to say that there was a third prize STILL available from trivia and it would have really changed the game. It was the mystery prize, and I'm shocked no one took it. It was basically, a "what do you want for a prize? propose something and i'll consider it" prize. That could have utterly changed the game.
Your question was, "What gives?"JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Yep. I asked you a pretty simple question that I didn't think you'd struggle to answer. Instead you didn't attempt to answer it, and instead decided to try to get under my skin with irrelevant crap like that right there.
You hardly have the moral high ground to ask me "What gives?" as though lynching absent(ish) people was at the foremost of my intentions, as though I should have voted with you simply because Neverwhere was less here than nutella.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:There are valid reasons to suspect nutella. I have suspected her for most of my time in this game. I don't vehemently oppose her lynch.
"Clearly" is an adverb- one of the most dangerous ones. It assumes something is true without knowing all the facts, whilst subtly attempting to get others to believe that something is true when they also don't know everything.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Whatever your alignment, you clearly don't have town interests at heart.
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Then your objectives and mine are not going to work together. Let's hope you're dead soon.Epignosis wrote:I was successful.
Have I gone from the empyrean heights of celestial blue to the hellish nadir of infernal crimson so soon?JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Based on the work I've done so far, my own gut, and where we stand right now, here's a rainbow:
Sloonei
Epignosis 2.0
fingersplints
nijuukyugou
Golden
Metalmarsh89
Gumshoe
Devin the Omniscient
Spacedaisy
S~V~S
nutella
Neverwhere
DFaraday
Well, if you're as good at convincing people to lynch me as you were for lynching Neverwhere, I'm not too concerned.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I don't know if your predetermined criteria is compatible with my win condition.Epignosis wrote:I said I would break a potential tie. I broke it in accordance with my own predetermined criteria.
You might need to go.
Is that what you think? That I failed?JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I know Epignosis will dislike me for this and I give no shits- if a person is playing for their own interests and passing off responsibility for their own failures to anyone else in the room, then you don't lessen the civilian tally by voting the person out.
Er...no. You're not playing vaguely, so you shouldn't be giving anyone broad strokes.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:You play vaguely, you get broad strokes.Epignosis wrote:That's...brushing with a broad stroke.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Epi, you endorsed a lynch of an inactive.
What gives?
And what, pray, might that tell you?Golden wrote:@jj - He said he would break the tie. I wanted to see how he would. Honestly, from my perspective they would always have been my two next votes anyway. I didn't buy the defences you and sloonei made of nutella. But I thought it might be able to tell us something about epi. It still might, if we vote neverwhere and she flips bad, eh?
That's...brushing with a broad stroke.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Epi, you endorsed a lynch of an inactive.
What gives?
My tie-breaking vote was actually predetermined.Golden wrote:I will admit played chicken to see how Epi would vote. I had pushed refresh literally two seconds earlier and the poll was open, epi had voted. By the time I clicked submit it was shut. I had tried to shift my vote back to Neverwhere but it failed.
I still would have gone back to voting for Nutella the next day, though, I expect.
Because I felt like it.Sloonei wrote:Why did you break it for nutella and not neverwhere?Epignosis wrote:I'm just here to break the ties, holmes.
Hello.Spacedaisy wrote:Epi...
Meh. It's more ornamental than anything. I don't think NeverHere is going to come in with anything revelatory in the next twenty-six minutes.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I'm assuming the "by" in that post is meant quite literally. Correct Epignosis? You want content from the players in question, not others?
The Loch Ness Monster doesn't exist, dummy. Nice try.Sloonei wrote:No, I am just saying that your suspicion is 100% speculative, so there is nothing serious I can say in response to it. I am town because the Loch Ness Monster has ordained it so.
Do you mean that, because you have been resurrected, you should be above suspicion?Sloonei wrote:I had left before you asked the question. Would you like to know what real life activity I was engaged in at the time? When I returned I responded to it when I saw it. I did not take it seriously because it was an entirely speculative point. You believe I was converted upon resurrection because hooded figures appeared in the mod's night message. You believe the mod told the thread that I am a bad guy. I am new to the Syndicate, but I don't think that sort of thing happens in any game of mafia anywhere.Epignosis wrote:Neverwhere? More like NeverHere amirite?Sloonei wrote:is that permissible?Epignosis wrote:When you cut me open with a hatchet?Sloonei wrote: I also plan on looking into him when I can.
What do you think of Neverwhere? Why is your vote on me?
I don't think of Neverwhere. No opinion. I'll vote to keep it from being a tie, as I've always said.
My vote is on you because you left when I asked you a question. You came back, ignored it, and then when I asked again, you treated it as though it was a joke.
It wasn't a joke.
Neverwhere? More like NeverHere amirite?Sloonei wrote:is that permissible?Epignosis wrote:When you cut me open with a hatchet?Sloonei wrote: I also plan on looking into him when I can.
What do you think of Neverwhere? Why is your vote on me?
When you cut me open with a hatchet?Sloonei wrote: I also plan on looking into him when I can.
People didn't accuse her.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Was she dismissive when people accused her of murder at work?Epignosis wrote:I worked with her for four years in real life.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I can understand your perspective. I don't know her style either so we're both left with our judgment calls, and as you said: we don't agree. I've found that some players are just a little cranky by nature when they are accused (particularly when accused repeatedly by one person). I think her behavior in defense against you seems to gel well enough with her conduct elsewhere in the game that I lean in favor of authenticity. She strikes me as a confident and capable player, and that type of player is probably more likely to be dismissive of cases against them regardless of alignment.Sloonei wrote:I am not familiar with nijuukyugou, so I can't claim to know how she would typically respond to a case like this one, but her strong dismissal of it as "nonsense", and all the stuff about her rejection of the theory that she's on a team with sig/g-man, makes me feel like this reaction is not genuine, and that she's reaching to swat the case away rather than addressing things directly.
It's a tenuous gut read.
Now why would he want to go and do a fool thing like that?Sloonei wrote:@ jay: Have you had a chance to look into MP/Epi 2.0?
I worked with her for four years in real life.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I can understand your perspective. I don't know her style either so we're both left with our judgment calls, and as you said: we don't agree. I've found that some players are just a little cranky by nature when they are accused (particularly when accused repeatedly by one person). I think her behavior in defense against you seems to gel well enough with her conduct elsewhere in the game that I lean in favor of authenticity. She strikes me as a confident and capable player, and that type of player is probably more likely to be dismissive of cases against them regardless of alignment.Sloonei wrote:I am not familiar with nijuukyugou, so I can't claim to know how she would typically respond to a case like this one, but her strong dismissal of it as "nonsense", and all the stuff about her rejection of the theory that she's on a team with sig/g-man, makes me feel like this reaction is not genuine, and that she's reaching to swat the case away rather than addressing things directly.
It's a tenuous gut read.
Regarding a silent vote that has been placed on him temporarily by a silent person?Sloonei wrote:I can vouch that this is perfectly ordinary behavior for Jay.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Hey look, Golden voted for me. I figured somebody would.
I'm going to assume my behavior on this page re: nutella is the reason and respond accordingly:
When someone makes a post that gives me pause about my crusade against them -- I am always going to allow that "pause" to be expressed publicly within my own behavior. Anything else is pure stubbornness/tunneling and I try not to play that way. I'll reference things in her post that inspired this reaction from me, even if it's largely a matter of intuition.
Sounds fun.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Let's make this thread a madhouse postapalooza during this EOD. No quiet walks to the gallows, either as a prisoner, executioner, or observer.
Epignosis wrote:Hey Sloonei.
Dem figures from da hood.
How corrupted you is?
Three hours to go. Changeable votes. You're ahead by two.nutella wrote:Well I see that no matter how much I try to defend myself I can't sway you guys from your tunnel vision. This always happens to me as a civ, I'm just so terrible at defending myselfJust like when I was Jacob in Biblical mafia and everyone mistakenly thought I was bad for a while. It's pretty frustrating that nothing I say will ever be taken seriously. And no one (besides Spacedaisy, thanks) ever considers my play in previous games to see that this is unfortunately how I usually am as a civ. But I wish the rest of the civvies good luck in winning this game, we had a good streak toward the beginning but now we keep lynching good guys. Once again I will recommend looking for the baddies in Neverwhere, DFaraday, Splints, possibly Metalmarsh and I'd even consider a corrupted Sloonei. Good luck.
