The Syndicate

YES! FINALLY.

I'm switching my vote to gman. I'll give sig the day to defend, since I wanted that when I was OT. Although this insanifier is not nearly as bad as the OT curse.

[VOTE: gman] aubergine

Vivax wrote: ↑Mon Oct 31, 2022 1:55 pm
Kate wrote: ↑Mon Oct 31, 2022 1:51 pm
Vivax wrote: ↑Mon Oct 31, 2022 1:48 pm
Golden wrote: ↑Mon Oct 31, 2022 1:45 pm Question for both Kate and the thread… did the pressure voting on sig produce anything at all?

You're voting him too ?

Strange question
You're acting weird today.
This has been one of my more restrained mafia games. And I like to act weird in my mafia games thank you.

Alrighty

Vivax wrote: ↑Mon Oct 31, 2022 1:53 pm
Golden wrote: ↑Mon Oct 31, 2022 1:49 pm
Vivax wrote: ↑Mon Oct 31, 2022 1:48 pm
Golden wrote: ↑Mon Oct 31, 2022 1:45 pm Question for both Kate and the thread… did the pressure voting on sig produce anything at all?
You're voting him too ?

Strange question
I don’t understand your point.
You can answer your question on your own anyways. But sig is afflicted by role, that warps things a bit with expecting a particular reaction from him.

Golden wrote: ↑Sun Oct 30, 2022 1:48 am Sig - a top town read on day one, seems to have vanished in day two, and that’s convenient, actually. In the first half of day two I had the sense mafia were under zero pressure… quiet thread, not much of much happening. Sig resting on his day one laurels fits that pattern. Would vote this way as things stand right now.

Sloonei - I think he’s town, no notes.

Vivax - sharp, I like what they’re contributing. Right now I have a decent town lean on them and I don’t feel the need to spend my time casing them. I agree with their goal of creating a town core although I agree with the wisdom of not doing it so overtly in a role madness game… you’re not only giving mafia a roadmap on who to kill, but also who to green and use other abilities on.
You have a point here with him dropping off but then I don't understand your flip to calling the sig votes pressure votes.

I'm pretty sure I said mine was to get him talking when I voted. Is there a way to search for my own votes, when I put Kate in the search it says it's too common of a word.

Scotty wrote: ↑Mon Oct 31, 2022 1:51 pm
Golden wrote: ↑Mon Oct 31, 2022 1:49 pm Oh, I see we are at 4 votes sig and 3 g-man. I should have checked the poll first before calling it a pressure vote.

I think sig vs g-man and keeping the vote tight between the two until at least the last hour or so is beneficial, see what happens if it’s close.
Paying close attention to Sloonei moving _off_ GMan onto Vivax and then Quin making a pretty shallow case on Kate.

Ditto.

Vivax wrote: ↑Mon Oct 31, 2022 1:48 pm
Golden wrote: ↑Mon Oct 31, 2022 1:45 pm Question for both Kate and the thread… did the pressure voting on sig produce anything at all?
You're voting him too ?

Strange question

You're acting weird today.

Golden wrote: ↑Mon Oct 31, 2022 1:45 pm Question for both Kate and the thread… did the pressure voting on sig produce anything at all?

Nope.

I'm getting the distinct feeling that the mafia is gunning for me today. I'll be watching for a sudden switch to me late day, if they can get one or 2 civs to buy in.

I'm not opposed to switching to gman. Plenty of votes on him from people I trust. I'm also comfortable leaving my vote on sig, although I'd like to hear something from him.

@Golden I'd love to hear your thoughts on these 2.

Vivax wrote: ↑Mon Oct 31, 2022 11:05 am well, former bea voter.
This is probably a smarter option for now. Could use some input here and I agree that Sig has fallen off.

[VOTE: Sig] aubergine

Yes I change my mind a lot

And, you just went from voting for me to voting with me, which again would have been pingy.

I don't know Sig is bad, but I know I'm not, so I'll cut you some slack for that. LOL

Vivax wrote: ↑Mon Oct 31, 2022 11:02 am
Kate wrote: ↑Mon Oct 31, 2022 10:52 am
Vivax wrote: ↑Mon Oct 31, 2022 10:47 am Fingersplints ffs.

That said, I think I want a Kate CW as being lone bea voter isn‘t going to get us far.

It‘s also not an unlikely pairing with Sloonei if the latter is indeed mafia.

[VOTE: Kate] aubergine
Huh? Now I'm really confused. You want me to what?
Have reads on display a tad more openly.
It‘s D3, we should be panicking or something. Plenty of time for slow starters to amp it up.

But every EoD outcome has felt largely random and the players who voted aggressively are being taken out.

I‘m open to the possibility that you are town but I don‘t see lots of efforts going on to sell the wagon you are voting.

p-edit: I‘m the bea voter, kate

I'm really honestly making a good faith effort to play the new style more than what I'm used to. You'll see uptrend there was a discussion about OGs (Which i prefer to old school or relic lol) keeping your reads close to your chest. Also, I made the first multi quote posts I've ever made. I'm doing my best to follow the new regime.

This is the first time I've been exposed to a rainbow list. That is something that never would have been done in the past. It would have been seen as target painting.

Ebwop. Dh on day 2.

Sorry I'm in the car.

Vivax wrote: ↑Mon Oct 31, 2022 10:47 am Fingersplints ffs.

That said, I think I want a Kate CW as being lone bea voter isn‘t going to get us far.

It‘s also not an unlikely pairing with Sloonei if the latter is indeed mafia.

[VOTE: Kate] aubergine

Also I voted Scotty day 1 and dh day. I never voted bea.

Vivax wrote: ↑Mon Oct 31, 2022 10:47 am Fingersplints ffs.

That said, I think I want a Kate CW as being lone bea voter isn‘t going to get us far.

It‘s also not an unlikely pairing with Sloonei if the latter is indeed mafia.

[VOTE: Kate] aubergine

Huh? Now I'm really confused. You want me to what?

Quin wrote: ↑Mon Oct 31, 2022 1:45 am
DFaraday wrote: ↑Sun Oct 30, 2022 8:06 pm
Quin wrote: ↑Sun Oct 30, 2022 2:08 am I've never played with Kate. Hi Kate!

Kate has been generating reads, but the vast majority of them are developed in reaction to other's posts. Very little proactive scum hunting is happening. I'm seeing this as a scum doing the rounds to respond to lots of prompts, but not generating anything new of her own accord.

Can you comment on this, @Kate ?
I don't think operating off of others' leads is alignment indicative; that's typically how I play regardless of alignment.
I can understand that it's NAI for you. I'd even agree with it.

I want Kate to tell me why it's not alignment indicative for her.

Hi, I'm here and reading along but I'm going to be pretty busy until at least 3 pm today. I have noted your question and I will get back to you.

Scotty wrote: ↑Sun Oct 30, 2022 11:48 pm
Kate wrote: ↑Sun Oct 30, 2022 11:45 pm
Scotty wrote: ↑Sun Oct 30, 2022 11:41 pm
Kate wrote: ↑Sun Oct 30, 2022 11:37 pm
Scotty wrote: ↑Sun Oct 30, 2022 11:25 pm
Kate wrote: ↑Sun Oct 30, 2022 7:42 pm One last thing, we should all be seriously concerned that dfaraday has posted FOUR times.
But isn’t that non-alignment indicative of him?

Not to defend him, because that’s still pretty terrible, but still.
From what I remember, he was a low poster in every game I played with him. It's concerning to me that, at the time of that post, 4 posts was hurting the civs chances of winning as we may be unlikely to lynch him (if he's bad) keeping the mafia alive because one player was playing. On the flip side (if he is civ) he's not contributing anything thus being no help to hunt down the baddies and he is simply just holding an alive civ role...while the rest of us who are playing get nk'd.
I mean yeah, low posters in a game without vigilante or town ability (that we know of) that can kill excess is not ideal. Don’t disagree with that.

I am pretty pro posting in general, if my annoyingly verbose yammering is any indication

Yes, another good point.
Hopefully its moot now, since he showed up and posted some and I hope he will continue to do so. But simply not posting helps no one but the baddies.
Remind me if I missed it- does he look civ to you with his recent emergence from the sewers today?

That's my concern, I don't think we've seen enough to make an educated guess. He sounded genuine I guess, for what we got.

Scotty wrote: ↑Sun Oct 30, 2022 11:41 pm
Kate wrote: ↑Sun Oct 30, 2022 11:37 pm
Scotty wrote: ↑Sun Oct 30, 2022 11:25 pm
Kate wrote: ↑Sun Oct 30, 2022 7:42 pm One last thing, we should all be seriously concerned that dfaraday has posted FOUR times.
But isn’t that non-alignment indicative of him?

Not to defend him, because that’s still pretty terrible, but still.
From what I remember, he was a low poster in every game I played with him. It's concerning to me that, at the time of that post, 4 posts was hurting the civs chances of winning as we may be unlikely to lynch him (if he's bad) keeping the mafia alive because one player was playing. On the flip side (if he is civ) he's not contributing anything thus being no help to hunt down the baddies and he is simply just holding an alive civ role...while the rest of us who are playing get nk'd.
I mean yeah, low posters in a game without vigilante or town ability (that we know of) that can kill excess is not ideal. Don’t disagree with that.

I am pretty pro posting in general, if my annoyingly verbose yammering is any indication

Yes, another good point.
Hopefully its moot now, since he showed up and posted some and I hope he will continue to do so. But simply not posting helps no one but the baddies.

Ebwop:

Should say: because one player was NOT Playing.

Hope this is clear, I'm tired.

Scotty wrote: ↑Sun Oct 30, 2022 11:25 pm
Kate wrote: ↑Sun Oct 30, 2022 7:42 pm One last thing, we should all be seriously concerned that dfaraday has posted FOUR times.
But isn’t that non-alignment indicative of him?

Not to defend him, because that’s still pretty terrible, but still.

From what I remember, he was a low poster in every game I played with him. It's concerning to me that, at the time of that post, 4 posts was hurting the civs chances of winning as we may be unlikely to lynch him (if he's bad) keeping the mafia alive because one player was playing. On the flip side (if he is civ) he's not contributing anything thus being no help to hunt down the baddies and he is simply just holding an alive civ role...while the rest of us who are playing get nk'd.

Linki

Ebwop: I quoted the wrong post but you know what I mean.

DFaraday wrote: ↑Sun Oct 30, 2022 8:06 pm
Quin wrote: ↑Sun Oct 30, 2022 2:08 am I've never played with Kate. Hi Kate!

Kate has been generating reads, but the vast majority of them are developed in reaction to other's posts. Very little proactive scum hunting is happening. I'm seeing this as a scum doing the rounds to respond to lots of prompts, but not generating anything new of her own accord.

Can you comment on this, @Kate ?
I don't think operating off of others' leads is alignment indicative; that's typically how I play regardless of alignment.

Ok good. This reads civ DF to me, but please play a little more.

i owe it all to you.

S~V~S wrote: ↑Sun Oct 30, 2022 7:41 pm
Kate wrote: ↑Sun Oct 30, 2022 7:37 pm look at me multiquoting!!! Applause!

You’re a champ!

One last thing, we should all be seriously concerned that dfaraday has posted FOUR times.

look at me multiquoting!!! Applause!

Golden wrote: ↑Sun Oct 30, 2022 7:00 pm
Kate wrote: ↑Sun Oct 30, 2022 6:26 pm @bea what are your thoughts on sig?

@Golden is your vote permanent or a placeholder type vote?
It wasn’t intended expected to be permanent, it’s a pressure vote.

As it stands right now… I am genuinely worried about sig, but I don’t know that he feels pressure from my vote. So I’m not sure it’s fulfilling its function. But I’m also thread behind. My thinking today is I’m focused on finding baddies within DF, G-Man, Michelle & sig. i still suspect SVS but I plan to let that develop and see if SVS can change my mind, I don’t see the benefit in putting massive early pressure there even if she is ultimately mafia, and I think there’s people (including you) whose reads I’ll need to trust… I’m terrible at reading SVS.

I will be very sus if sig just never shows up again. I don’t think the vowel curse is an excuse to take the day off, and I’d like evidence that he’s thinking.

I'm going to add to the pressure and [VOTE: vote sig] aubergine I'm open to moving that if sig shows up.

So far svs as come in as civ svs imo although I thought dh was bad, that could be partly emotional though...I wouldn't vote her today anyway unless I was certain as she just got her and she deserves a chance to show us she's civ.

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Sun Oct 30, 2022 7:18 pm EoD vibes were odd.

I tone tasted the LoRab and found daffodils.

I tone tasted the Quin and I found brick.

I tone tasted the G Bro and they taste of sock.

I have no idea at all what you're talking about. Pretty much ever. Is there a legend to decode lickyspeak?

@bea what are your thoughts on sig?

@Golden is your vote permanent or a placeholder type vote?

Scotty wrote: ↑Thu Oct 27, 2022 12:06 pm
Kate wrote: ↑Thu Oct 27, 2022 11:59 am
Scotty wrote: ↑Thu Oct 27, 2022 11:54 am
Kate wrote: ↑Thu Oct 27, 2022 11:42 am wow, 10 years sure has been a long time.
My boys are 17, 14 and 14 now. My adopted daughter gave me a beautiful granddaughter who I am raising. She's a doll.

What's up with you guys?

I know you didn’t ask me but that’s a big family you’ve got! I’m always amazed at how those of you with kids can still take time to play this silly game on this site. Kudos to you

I definitely want to know. Do you have dogs? I also have 3 big dogs that I got before I realized I'd be raising another infant

Ive also got a step daughter from my first marriage. Shes all grown up now but we are still besties
I’m acutely aware that you probably can only talk in off topic today by the way

Yeah, the wife and I got a little angel who is ~2 years old. We figured before even entertaining having a child we’d want to do a trial run with a dog first. She’s a little pumpkin and keeps our hands and hearts full, and is basically our child. I can’t imagine having kids on top of that.

My grandmother had a habit of adopting grandchildren. I call it a habit, because it really was a hobby of hers. It felt like every 3 weeks she’d meet someone at her church that could use a little extra love in their life. I just went to her 90th birthday party and she told me she has 38 adopted grandkids. That’s on top of her 6 real children and the mass of underlings from there. I don’t even know how that’s possible.

Meanwhile my dog wants me to throw the ball and I’m tooo tiiiiirred

sig wrote: ↑Thu Oct 27, 2022 1:30 pm
LoRab wrote: ↑Thu Oct 27, 2022 1:02 pm I'm here!! Went to bed before the results posted last night (because I'm an old person). RIPIYWG (nd you probably were), Splints. (and yes, I know that all of the night victims are likely civ, but I make no assumptions--assumptions are dangerous in this game). And sorry that this post is kind of all over the place.

Splints is a good player, and so I can see why she'd be a N1 target for mafia. Especially if one of the players is someone whom she historically has been able to read. Now I need to remember who that could be. And, mafia knows that anyone not on their team is civ, so is a good target no matter what.

And I should have a normal-er schedule now, so can post more regularly. And maybe actually get reads on people.

Also, I swear that I totally submitted a song for the contest, but now that message seems to have disappeared, and it's super weird. And I'm curious where it went to.

Looking at the visible night results, Kate was Greened and Bea was somethinged. Not knowing what role/circumstance had that effect on Bea, hard to say if that's good or bad. I disagree with whomever said it was a result of the map poll--since she wasn't the only Canada voter, but seems to be the only one whose posts have been altered. And she even said (I think?) that it wasn't Vompatti.

I have more thoughts and I'll remember them later.

This is an good call out also it should be noted Kates curse was mafia driven while we can assume Bea curse is civ

sig wrote: ↑Thu Oct 27, 2022 1:31 pm I’m going to soft read Kate unless someone wonky happened with the curse (bouncing/misdirect)

sig wrote: ↑Thu Oct 27, 2022 10:34 pm
Scotty wrote: ↑Thu Oct 27, 2022 10:27 pm Mid D1 reads list time. Only mildly fleshed out.

Townreads:
-GMan (from his insistence on adverb posting)
-Llama (willing to post reads. Seems genuinely hunting. Reads mostly align with mine)
-Kate (I don’t think she would fake her OT posting on day 2)

Townlean:
-Elo (she might have towntold. Needs more evidence. But end of day 1 is probably a good sign)
-bea (I have a role in mind for bea. Could bump up to townread)
-Golden (had a nice time doing the New York Times Saturday crossword last night. A strong presence in thread. He is withholding many suspicions for ‘The Greater Good’, which is frustrating but I get it)
-sig (I had a good feeling about his D1, and although I can’t right now remember what he’s said, I seem to remember him having a presence. Only light town)
-Michelle (exhibited a nosy enough D1. Want more. D2 is underwhelming)
-Vivax2.0 (hasn’t posted yet, but his slot was fine. Note: fine. This slot could be as close to null as I have. Putting as Townlean for now)

Scumlean:
-Wilgy (I just have no reason to call him town at the moment. Had him as a Townlean D1)
-DF (this is also town meta for him. )
-Sloonei (if sloonei isn’t the lynch switcher as Golden implies then he shoots up to scummy for me for weird behavior D1)

Currently suspecting LoRab, DH, Quin

I like this list a lot and is generally in line with my views.

only difference is I’d move Eloh to solid town, golden a bit further down but still town lean and bounce Lorah into neutral and maybe Michelle to scum lean

Scotty wrote: ↑Thu Oct 27, 2022 10:27 pm Mid D1 reads list time. Only mildly fleshed out.

Townreads:
-GMan (from his insistence on adverb posting)
-Llama (willing to post reads. Seems genuinely hunting. Reads mostly align with mine)
-Kate (I don’t think she would fake her OT posting on day 2)

Townlean:
-Elo (she might have towntold. Needs more evidence. But end of day 1 is probably a good sign)
-bea (I have a role in mind for bea. Could bump up to townread)
-Golden (had a nice time doing the New York Times Saturday crossword last night. A strong presence in thread. He is withholding many suspicions for ‘The Greater Good’, which is frustrating but I get it)
-sig (I had a good feeling about his D1, and although I can’t right now remember what he’s said, I seem to remember him having a presence. Only light town)
-Michelle (exhibited a nosy enough D1. Want more. D2 is underwhelming)
-Vivax2.0 (hasn’t posted yet, but his slot was fine. Note: fine. This slot could be as close to null as I have. Putting as Townlean for now)

Scumlean:
-Wilgy (I just have no reason to call him town at the moment. Had him as a Townlean D1)
-DF (this is also town meta for him. )
-Sloonei (if sloonei isn’t the lynch switcher as Golden implies then he shoots up to scummy for me for weird behavior D1)

Currently suspecting LoRab, DH, Quin

OK so here are the first mentions of the OT curse. First Scotty points it out with no elaboration.

Then Lorab mentions it but states that it mafia driven.

Sig next mentions it by saying that he's probably thinking its an actual curse while throwing in some alternative ideas about target switching, etc.

Then he says he will soft read me, not sure what that means exactly but I assume he's taking my posts with a grain of salt and not just a pass.

Then Scotty posts a list of players and impressions and lists me as Town Core. Sig then quotes that post and completely agrees with it - with some adjustments which do not include me.
This isn't the pingiest argument ever written, however, I assume more people noticed the slip up after the night ended so that leads me to believe that Sig is dropping crumbs of doubt without outright saying it when he knows that I'm not deserving of doubt. So Sig is on my list.

G-Man wrote: ↑Sun Oct 30, 2022 3:32 pm

Kate:
She spends D1 sus on Scotty. This looks wrongheaded to me now, so I am curious if her read on him changed. @Kate What's your current opinion on Scotty? I feel ashamed to say that I don't remember Kate's playstyle at all. Perhaps it's just been that long. The level of sass took me by surprise, but we were a sassy bunch back in those days. She was OT Green for D2, but she got a few non-OT posts off at the start of the day. This makes me ponder if Kate had an OG townslip here. I understand the tinfoil theory about baddies OT'ing their own to buy them space, but it doesn't seem like Kate was suddenly in danger of falling onto the radar in a bad way. Also, if a baddie is OT'd, I don't think that they make the mistake of rattling off a few non-OT posts like that. The rest of D2 was lost to OT Green. N2 she comes in hot and mixes it up with a few people, DH the most. Overall, there seems to be a fair amount of culture clash and adjustment for Kate. Not surprising for a deep OG player. I can see the difficulty with how different the game is now being a talking point that a baddie could exploit, but her frustration seems genuine and I still doubt that a baddie goofs up on the OT bit at the start of the day. Not a lock, but that possible townslip is more than enough for me to keep her out of the poe.

Votes: Scotty D1, DH D2

Scotty's play rubbed me the wrong way on day 1, he is a very high poster - which admittedly I am not used to. I was always a very active player but I was NEVER one to come in with a wall of text or meticulously detailed reasoning and analysis. That test post above is the first multiquote post I've ever made, ever. I do get more rattled when I'm a civ because I start to feel lost and then frustrated. But I suppose what else would I say at this point? Anyway back to Scotty, once more people came in playing the same style as he does, I realized it may be play style and I laid off.

As for the OT posts on day 2, I started posting right away without checking my PMs. I felt horrible about this and I was resolved not to call attention to it unless someone else did first, and well here we are. I feel bad that I did that and I apologize to Mr. Green OT baddie. I'm a rule follower I just forgot all about checking PMs when the days start. Just thinking aloud here, but I'm going to go back and look at who started to suggest I was bad based on the "self OT." Its possible that none of the civs were making this suggestion, as the baddies may have hoped, and started to drop ideas about that in order to get a wagon for me going. I'm going to look into this. I'll be back.

Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Sun Oct 30, 2022 1:55 pm Effective immediately S~V~S will be replacing Dharmahelper. Please do not discuss subs.

test

Kate wrote: ↑Sun Oct 30, 2022 1:59 pm
Vivax wrote: ↑Sun Oct 30, 2022 1:43 pm Quin looks better on a reread with the latest posts.
Kate/Bea maybe ?

Or Bea/Sloonei (considering how Sloonei handled Quin and bea reads and then assuming Quin town)

And DFara remains a coinflip.

I‘m unsure if the Kate/DH exchanges suggest aligned.
Kate does. IMHO

test

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Oct 30, 2022 2:00 pm It has been a hot minute since I played with SVS. Welcome!

test

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Oct 30, 2022 2:00 pm
Vivax wrote: ↑Sun Oct 30, 2022 1:43 pm Quin looks better on a reread with the latest posts.
Kate/Bea maybe ?

Or Bea/Sloonei (considering how Sloonei handled Quin and bea reads and then assuming Quin town)

And DFara remains a coinflip.

I‘m unsure if the Kate/DH exchanges suggest aligned.
I do not understand what you think you see in my Bea read.

test

S~V~S wrote: ↑Sun Oct 30, 2022 2:41 pm Thanks for the welcome!

Golden wrote: ↑Sun Oct 30, 2022 2:06 pm Welcome SVS, you were the person I was most sad you weren’t in the player list to begin, glad you’re here!

Also Heiots though
Heiots she was too sweet for Mafia.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Oct 30, 2022 2:00 pm It has been a hot minute since I played with SVS. Welcome!
Thanks! Good (but weird) to be here.

Kate wrote: ↑Sun Oct 30, 2022 2:25 pm Yay! Welcome SVS!

Did anyone tell you how to multiquote? I saw you asked earlier? you hit the quotation mark in the upper right of the first post you want to quote (I have the dark screen, it may be different on a light background). Then when you're in the posting screen, hit "Expand View" over the top of the last post directly under your posting window, and hit the quote mark in the post you want to quote. there might be a better, newer way, but I don't know it.

I'm working on a megapost, bbl.

THANK YOU!!! I do have the dark screen. I mayormaynot make a test post. thanks again

Has anyone completed a recount of yesterday's vote and compiled the order? I'm not sure that's worded right... If not, does anyone plan to? I think yesterday's lynch could give us some valuable info.

Yay! Welcome SVS!

Vivax wrote: ↑Sun Oct 30, 2022 1:43 pm Quin looks better on a reread with the latest posts.
Kate/Bea maybe ?

Or Bea/Sloonei (considering how Sloonei handled Quin and bea reads and then assuming Quin town)

And DFara remains a coinflip.

I‘m unsure if the Kate/DH exchanges suggest aligned.

Kate does. IMHO

Scotty wrote: ↑Sun Oct 30, 2022 12:40 pm
sig wrote: ↑Sun Oct 30, 2022 9:56 am Of DH os guong tu kiip thi wuw os mi end silf vuti thong guong wi moght es will vuti hom uff whin wi hevi thi woggli ruum
That’s DOCTOR woggli ruum, sir

And yeah. I feel that. He’s literally thrown his hands up on this game and nothing about it helps the town.

DH. If you are town, this isn’t over. The whole shtick blasting people for not reading your posts: that’s unhelpful, and perhaps if many people are missing things that seem obvious to you in your posts, it’s an error on the part of the communicator.

Let’s find a baseline again- who do you find suspicious?

I have to agree, it also comes off as a tad superior (or condescending) which may be why people were just getting mad in general. No one wants to play that way and I apologize if I was part of the problem.

juliets wrote: ↑Sun Oct 30, 2022 9:58 am Sounds like you are having a blast @Elohcin!

Also, y'all I heard from Typhoony!! He's doing great, life has been good to him. Here are some pictures of one of the loves of his life! The comments are Typh's:

And the dog is doing fine, he loves the sand that is currently in our back yard

But he also loves it when its cold and we wrap him in blankets

And he also loves to watch us when we're working, or eating, or playing a game, or whatever

I asked him to give me the doggy but he wouldn't do it. Some friend he is!

cute doggies are cute

Would anyone please be kind enough to show me how to multiquote?

Scotty wrote: ↑Sat Oct 29, 2022 6:55 pm
DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Sat Oct 29, 2022 6:45 pm
Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Sat Oct 29, 2022 6:17 pm
Scotty wrote: ↑Fri Oct 28, 2022 11:57 pm
Golden wrote: ↑Fri Oct 28, 2022 10:43 pm Hello scotty would you like to play a game of snap with me.
Is that the one where we lick each other in the balls as hard as we can until someone yells mercy?
I am dying.

no i am
Pretty heavy handed.

Why on Earth would mafia kill you right now? You’re prime miselim material if you’re town

The ONLY way he is killed at night right now is if his own team sacrifices him to distance themselves from him. This is an idea I wouldn't even have considered in my previous games however, if you can win while dead, then why not?

Scotty wrote: ↑Sat Oct 29, 2022 2:23 pm
Golden wrote: ↑Sat Oct 29, 2022 1:51 am Oh, I didn’t think of Kate break. That’s viable.

The thoughts I had were 1) it’s not an every night ability or 2) map is dead.
Remind me of what Kate break is. I have my assumptions of course but I don’t know this meta since I’ve never played with Kate

In my defense, I had just had twins so my bladder wasn't at its peak efficiency.

It was when anyone had to go pee.

thellama73 wrote: ↑Sat Oct 29, 2022 11:37 am It wouldn't be classic mafia without at least four players saying they hate the game and want to quit! Ah, memories...

thank you for making me laugh!!

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Sat Oct 29, 2022 11:03 am
Kate wrote: ↑Sat Oct 29, 2022 10:59 am
DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Sat Oct 29, 2022 10:55 am Its not illegal to give a reason for your suspicions at night. The only reason one wouldn't has nothing to do with whether their a moron (Which I didn't say, but not reading what I'm saying/Saying I'm saying different things is very on brand and in vogue so no sweat).

One would repeatedly refuse to give a reason for their vote/suspicion, I'd think, because they didn't have a good one that would stand the test of scrutiny.

I want to engage with someone, anyone at all really, who has a legitimate reason for suspecting me, but Every time I do try to do that, I get nothing back. Which is cool and fun.
So glad you're having a good time.

*it's they're
Okay now like Golden I am actually legitimately remembering why I hate this game and everything to do with it and don't want to play it.

Ditto, which is why I tried to walk away from this exchange.

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Sat Oct 29, 2022 10:55 am Its not illegal to give a reason for your suspicions at night. The only reason one wouldn't has nothing to do with whether their a moron (Which I didn't say, but not reading what I'm saying/Saying I'm saying different things is very on brand and in vogue so no sweat).

One would repeatedly refuse to give a reason for their vote/suspicion, I'd think, because they didn't have a good one that would stand the test of scrutiny.

I want to engage with someone, anyone at all really, who has a legitimate reason for suspecting me, but Every time I do try to do that, I get nothing back. Which is cool and fun.

So glad you're having a good time.

*it's they're

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Sat Oct 29, 2022 10:51 am
Kate wrote: ↑Sat Oct 29, 2022 10:49 am
DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Sat Oct 29, 2022 10:46 am
Kate wrote: ↑Sat Oct 29, 2022 10:45 am
DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Sat Oct 29, 2022 10:41 am
Kate wrote: ↑Sat Oct 29, 2022 8:56 am
DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Sat Oct 29, 2022 4:08 am Kate - "I suspect you, DH"
Me - "Okay why, like explain."
Kate - [exits, pursued by a bear]

Interesting and very civvie.
I was having an internal hissy fit last night and had to walk away from you, in particular. I'll get back to it in the day period. That's the way I play, deal with it.
You responded to several other people and were at least lurking for a while but assuming you did actually step away, now that you have, you are free to share your suspicions/reasons for voting for me aren't you?
As I said, I had to walk away from YOU in particular.
Yes but now (and every time) That I ask you why you suspect me you can't seem to say why.
I guess I'm just a moron. I'll do what I want to do about your request of me in the DAY PERIOD. Can I make that any more clear to you?
Okay so you don't actually suspect me, that's very cool.

I'm done with you for the night period. Period.

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Sat Oct 29, 2022 10:46 am
Kate wrote: ↑Sat Oct 29, 2022 10:45 am
DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Sat Oct 29, 2022 10:41 am
Kate wrote: ↑Sat Oct 29, 2022 8:56 am
DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Sat Oct 29, 2022 4:08 am Kate - "I suspect you, DH"
Me - "Okay why, like explain."
Kate - [exits, pursued by a bear]

Interesting and very civvie.
I was having an internal hissy fit last night and had to walk away from you, in particular. I'll get back to it in the day period. That's the way I play, deal with it.
You responded to several other people and were at least lurking for a while but assuming you did actually step away, now that you have, you are free to share your suspicions/reasons for voting for me aren't you?
As I said, I had to walk away from YOU in particular.
Yes but now (and every time) That I ask you why you suspect me you can't seem to say why.

I guess I'm just a moron. I'll do what I want to do about your request of me in the DAY PERIOD. Can I make that any more clear to you?

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Sat Oct 29, 2022 10:41 am
Kate wrote: ↑Sat Oct 29, 2022 8:56 am
DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Sat Oct 29, 2022 4:08 am Kate - "I suspect you, DH"
Me - "Okay why, like explain."
Kate - [exits, pursued by a bear]

Interesting and very civvie.
I was having an internal hissy fit last night and had to walk away from you, in particular. I'll get back to it in the day period. That's the way I play, deal with it.
You responded to several other people and were at least lurking for a while but assuming you did actually step away, now that you have, you are free to share your suspicions/reasons for voting for me aren't you?

As I said, I had to walk away from YOU in particular.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Oct 29, 2022 3:12 am … I hope the hosts didn’t go too old school and reinstitute the “only players alive at the end of the game can win” rule.

What?? You can win while dead??

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Sat Oct 29, 2022 4:08 am Kate - "I suspect you, DH"
Me - "Okay why, like explain."
Kate - [exits, pursued by a bear]

Interesting and very civvie.

I was having an internal hissy fit last night and had to walk away from you, in particular. I'll get back to it in the day period. That's the way I play, deal with it.

Golden wrote: ↑Sat Oct 29, 2022 1:52 am
bea wrote: ↑Sat Oct 29, 2022 1:46 am As for Kate, I thought the idea of mafia self targeting was interesting. However, I don't think I buy that she was D1 in the hot seat enough to warrant that particular call. Her old skool meta feels as on brand as lorabs was. I need more time there. The fact that she did post OT so much feels like a good look though. Maybe I'm just jaded cuz I missed out on the OT cuz insanified. IDK. I've had And + mafia makes me miss my V. AKA Dreamy. My sweet durfunk mafia sister
I have no read on Kate yet but if she’s mafia I think the most likely explanation for greening your own teammate in a case like her is that they knew they were going to be busy and wanted a pass.

I obviously was not busy. I was here reading and I posted often OT.

I also put my vote on DH, then moved it to Lorab in an attempt to get her to talk, then moved it back to DH.

Golden wrote: ↑Fri Oct 28, 2022 9:46 pm
Scotty wrote: ↑Fri Oct 28, 2022 9:43 pm
Golden wrote: ↑Fri Oct 28, 2022 9:41 pm
Scotty wrote: ↑Fri Oct 28, 2022 9:37 pmI believe Golden has bought the swill due to maybe thinking Sloonei is a particular town role. But I don’t buy it. It’s too heavy handed.
Why do you think it is too heavy-handed?
If you think he is what I think you think he is, I think he would do a better job of hiding it
Why?

Is role claiming and hinting really that accepted now? I get that I'm seriously OG here but isn't the whole point of this game trying to figure out who everyone is without knowledge that comes with your own role?

thellama73 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 28, 2022 9:01 pm Kate, ignore Sloonei’s question and answer mine instead. Are you bad?

Very very very much not.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Oct 28, 2022 8:58 pm @Kate Care to speculate about why you were targeted by OT Green?

So the old school players would think I did it to myself I presume.

Search found 142 matches