The Syndicate

Won't have time to catch up before the vote. Going with my strongest suspicion for where I was when I was caught up yesterday: Epig.

Epignosis wrote:
birdwithteeth11 wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
Roxy wrote:Epi - I do not believe that on Day 0 with one word and one letter you can say with any degree of certainty that Elo is not an Old Rogue -wife or no.
MM is right you are distracting from yourself with Elo and shame on you !
How am I distracting from myself when I have done nothing but bring attention my way?

Do you think Elohcin is even reading the thread?
With how far I am, I'd be inclined to say she is not reading the thread.

How you can already be making assumptions when she's said all but two words (up to the point I've read) doesn't sit right with me. I understand your logic, but I need more concrete evidence.
I made a single assumption that was predicated on more than two words. If my assumption is correct, then Elohcin is highly unlikely to be an Old Rogue. If my assumption is wrong, then I will be surprised.

What sort of concrete evidence do you expect to find to back up your vote on Day 1?

Because while you feel you may have a good read on her, I feel like I need more in-thread evidence to justify a vote for her than just your reasoning behind why she could be bad.

Not much on Day 1. Not like we have a lot to go on at this point. And I have even less since I probably have to vote in about 2 hours.

Long Con wrote:So llama is deliberately trying to act in such a way that is like a previous Civ game? Is that supposed to make us think he's Civ in this one? Kind of heavy handed.

My thoughts exactly.

I'm currently mulling over either an Epignosis or llama vote. I still think Epig is making a stretch is making assumptions about his wife this early on. And it wouldn't surprise me if llama acting this way in X-men when he was a civ is making him decided to act in a similar manner early on because of is previous role in a previous game. Seems like the kind of trick he'd try to pull on us.

DharmaHelper wrote:
Spacedaisy wrote:Did you want to?
I don't think he's a civvie. I don't like his whole Day 0 schtick, it got annoying very quickly. Also, I noticed he didn't berate anyone for any logical fallacies throughout the entire duration of Day 0. People were jumping to conclusions all over the place and Llama did not voice any opposition to it.

To be fair, he spent most of his Day 0 talking about monkeys and in OT banter about the game's theme in a joking manner. Like most people did.

Which logical fallacies are you referring to?

Epignosis wrote:
Roxy wrote:Epi - I do not believe that on Day 0 with one word and one letter you can say with any degree of certainty that Elo is not an Old Rogue -wife or no.
MM is right you are distracting from yourself with Elo and shame on you !
How am I distracting from myself when I have done nothing but bring attention my way?

Do you think Elohcin is even reading the thread?

With how far I am, I'd be inclined to say she is not reading the thread.

How you can already be making assumptions when she's said all but two words (up to the point I've read) doesn't sit right with me. I understand your logic, but I need more concrete evidence.

Sorry I haven't been around everyone! Working 6 days this week does not make me very conducive to lots of time for mafia. I have this morning free at least so I'm going to try catching up now. Might have to vote today too unfortunately, because I probably won't be able to post again until the lynch poll closes.

blindfaeth wrote:Um,

pardon my french but

does anyone know....

why there is a MONKEY in this game? :P

FOUND ONE

Bullzeye wrote:I feel like some people can take day 0 joking far too seriously.

My sentiments exactly. So far anyway.

Edit: MAY I hold him down? I don't want the grammar police coming after me.

Long Con wrote:
DFaraday wrote:
birdwithteeth11 wrote:
Long Con wrote:Looks like Llama is either Gorilla Grodd himself, or trying really hard to get Grodd's attention.
What makes you think that?
Probably the fact that he keeps bringing up the MONKEY.
Yeah, that's it. He's really pushing the Monkey, like, more than a passing comment on something he finds peculiar. I don't really know why he's doing it. He seems like he wants attention so far in this game.

Linki: Yeah, it's been hard to not respond to the things you're saying, because every time I imagine posting what I'd want to say, I just don't like the endgame on it. You pushed it enough with the Monkey that I slipped from ignoring you and said something. But, seriously, I kind of want to beat you up.

Alright. Makes sense then.

Can I hold him down while you beat the stuffing out of him?

Long Con wrote:Looks like Llama is either Gorilla Grodd himself, or trying really hard to get Grodd's attention.

What makes you think that?

Metalmarsh89 wrote:I would be happy if the Reds could beat the Cardinals.

We just don't win any series that occur in that city. But then again, I think it's going to be them or the Pirates playing the Nats in the NLCS sooooooo....

Reds still projected at 75 wins this season. I'd be ecstatic with a .500 season.

I went with 'A'. For one reason and one good reason only:

The Syndicate

Search found 13 matches

Re: The Flash: Battle for the Gem Cities (Day 1)

Re: The Flash: Battle for the Gem Cities (Day 0)

Re: The Flash: Battle for the Gem Cities (Day 1)

Re: The Flash: Battle for the Gem Cities (Day 1)

Re: The Flash: Battle for the Gem Cities (Day 0)

Re: The Flash: Battle for the Gem Cities (Day 1)

Re: The Flash: Battle for the Gem Cities (Day 0)

Re: The Flash: Battle for the Gem Cities (Day 0)

Re: The Flash: Battle for the Gem Cities (Day 0)

Re: The Flash: Battle for the Gem Cities (Day 0)

Re: The Flash: Battle for the Gem Cities (Day 0)

Re: The Flash: Battle for the Gem Cities (Day 0)

Re: The Flash: Battle for the Gem Cities (Day 0)