The Syndicate

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

DisgruntledPorcupine wrote:

Roxy wrote:DP - was very disappointed that he cba,ed to respond to me. I understand why he is getting the votes he has so far.

Sorry, forgot. It'd take some effort for me to come up with 3. But...

TinyBubbles because her posts just feel bad to me.

DH because he hasn't read like himself, and I didn't like the whole situation with Scotty.

Not totally sure who I'd place at #3.

What about Bubbles posts rubs you the wrong way? Gimme those deets, Porucpine.

Roxy wrote:DP - was very disappointed that he cba,ed to respond to me. I understand why he is getting the votes he has so far.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Well now I feel better about my vote.

Die DigruntledStevenWilson.

aapje wrote:I'm a bit torn. On one hand there is TB. She made a couple of posts that didn't sit right with me, chiefly amongst them the reaction to the lynch. For this I would have no problem voting for her. However, there are two things giving me pause: how easily people are jumping on her and DP's who just comes into the thread with a smug face as if he has nothing to be ashamed of.

Canucklehead wrote:DP wanting to vote TB makes me want to change my vote. :s

aapje wrote:

DisgruntledPorcupine wrote:

aapje wrote:

DisgruntledPorcupine wrote:Hello friends. I will try to answer some questions.

I'll try one. When are you planning on playing the game?

I am.

So apart from your lack of reading skills do you have anything of value to add to this thread?

timmer wrote:

aapje wrote:

DisgruntledPorcupine wrote:Hello friends. I will try to answer some questions.

I'll try one. When are you planning on playing the game?

I second this. Like, is there any actual reason to keep you in this game?

aapje wrote:

DisgruntledPorcupine wrote:Hello friends. I will try to answer some questions.

I'll try one. When are you planning on playing the game?

birdwithteeth11 wrote:

DisgruntledPorcupine wrote:Position 3

A little late for that lol.

Golden wrote:

S~V~S wrote:I tend to judge people as individuals not as reputations. My best game of all time was Rabbits SOT, I was a ... civvie. We had a large civ BTS group, and we worked pretty well together. That team has been my gold standard of what a team should be. Not so much for the individuals (although they all were awesome and people in the Mafia community that I <3 maybe a bit more than most) but for the way we worked together. I would want cohesion more than anything, really. Team players, no Prima Donnas.

What was your theory?

That a good choice for a first lynch might be someone who has a reputation for surviving deep and not getting caught when bad, since a baddie might try to recruit someone that gave them the best shot at winning. Someone like DF or DP, for example, who frequently fly under the radar. Or someone like Typhoony or llama who can often survive deep on their wily skills by not being too civvish to NK nor too baddie-looking to get lynched.

But if I look at my own psyche, I'd probably just pick people who I felt I could have fun with too. Or that I really wanted to have btsc with because I hadn't yet, or something.