@S~V~S
S~V~S wrote:Can you point out to me the specific parts you especially like about his case?
This post is the first time I thought --- what? wait...about you. ****I spoilered it bc this could become a bit messy****
Neither of you can reads minds as far as I know.
S~V~S wrote: ↑Fri Mar 01, 2024 6:22 am
Long Con wrote: ↑Fri Mar 01, 2024 1:57 am
From what I can tell, both Spacedaisy and Lime Coke thought they were breaking a three-way tie, or at least deciding the result?
If either Abi or sig are a Wolf, then it looks suspicious, but if they're both town, it's somewhat clearing, I think. Would a Wolf see a three-way Town tie and call attention to themselves as the decider?
Daisys last post regarding Wilgy was a very vague kinda null read. Wilgy was supatowning from out the gate, and
I think Daisy knows his game well.
Also "from what I can tell"~ how can you tell what Daisy was thinking? We won't know until she tells us, which she chose not to do.
Also if you find making a drive by vote to break a tie that results in the death of a civvie not suspicious, I congratulate you on your open mindedness
Long Con wrote: ↑Fri Mar 01, 2024 1:57 am
Yeah, I'm feeling like suspecting daisy for that vote is putting the cart before the horse. As in, it's only suspicious if Abi or sig are wolves.
Yeah, well, as someone who voted sig cause I thought they were bad, and still thinks they're bad, I think the horse is right where it belongs.
If Daisy comes in and tells us why her viewpoint on Wilgy evolved enough to vote for him, I might then change my vote to sig. I need to go over Falcons interactions with him EOD day one.
Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2024 11:36 pm
Actually, no I misread that. I think it was falcon he was annoyed with and I can see why. sig was joking with Epi and says he was fluff posting and falcon seemed to be making a big deal out of it. I'm not sure I get what falcon meant.
The only weird thing I see with sig is actually just the fact that he is pinged by Epi for not joking, when he was even joking with Epi himself.
This is Daisys actual last post, from Tuesday night, almost a full day before EOD. A lot happened in that time, much of it somewhat esoteric disagreements about mafia philosophy. Nothing that Wilgy has not said before in other games,
and I think Daisy knows his game better than most. I reread Wilgy to see if there was anything that could have changed her mind from "meh" to voting him, and I couldn't find it.
Her last post, understanding why sig is annoyed with Falcon. Gotta get ready for work, stayed late last night, go in early today. Luckily the month ends only ... once a month lol.
But yeah, gonna reread sig with a focus on his interactions with Falcon.
I might believe that if you throw a juice box at me.
Like it was bad form of LC (red) to act like he can read thoughts or think about the who/what/where/when/why of a mafia game vote but it was entirely ok for you to do it twice. (pink)
Long Con wrote:
... along with two confirmed Town. She came in here today ready to berate Wilgy voters, and dive right on to the Lowest Hanging Fruit, Spacedaisy, for her stealth Wilgy vote. Lime Coke made the exact same vote, and you haven't even questioned him about it, even though when Daisy did it, it's damning.
I get that voting without posting is not ever a good look, but is that good evidence of a wolf? You acknowledged that it's not the greatest move for a Wolf to make, but then decided you still believe it.
And... I just plain don't believe this: "I reread Wilgy to see if there was anything that could have changed her mind from "meh" to voting him, and I couldn't find it."
So, you're saying you attempted reread Wilgy's progression through Day 1 from Daisy's perspective somehow to find the point where she most likely decided she suspects him?
Yeah right. There's no way you did that, you're posting fake busywork to look towny. Why would you even bother doing that, we have two days and the answer you're looking for will almost certainly come to light unless Daisy has simply abandoned the game.
I agreed with part he pointed out of the why you wasn't holding lil LC to the same standards to which you held Daisy.
I also agreed with his busy work comment bc that is how I felt when I read it.
Long Con wrote: ↑Fri Mar 01, 2024 2:22 pm
S~V~S wrote: ↑Fri Mar 01, 2024 12:33 pm
Lime Coke wrote: ↑Wed Feb 28, 2024 10:59 pm
[VOTE:
Wilgy] aubergine
@Long Con
Not the same vote at all. He posted for one thing. He made several posts in a row. He was involved and his suspects also evolved.
And I am not the only one pissy about the Wilgy yeet, read the beginning of today again.
Wilgy voted sig before me, and falcon voted him using my actual “I may vote for sig” as his jump off point.
So ok, whatever.
It's the same vote as in, they both thought they were the one to put Wilgy over. I get that their approach was different in obvious ways, but if you think that Daisy was trying to save sig, then why wouldn't you suspect Lime Coke of voting for the same reason? Involvement and explanation notwithstanding... a wolf who is participatory would, of course, approach their vote in a participatory way. Are you saying you're more suspicious of the nonparticipation, or the "they voted to save sig" aspect?
And I'm quite sure I don't need to be told to reread the beginning of today again. The post where I voted you quite clearly discusses the three of you (Michelle, Abi, and yourself), and individually addresses each of you about it.
To me your reply up top about how lil LC was different but I felt that still really did not address big LC's point. The "save" for civvie sig.
If you were looking for more than big LC's case then I can add more things on my own like my first quote pull.
You are a skilled player and
It means I had Copied the star for doing an Abi mention, and felt like Pasting it some more while I had it loaded. No relevant meaning to the game.
Is my Michelle read the same as what? Why her specifically? I'd say it's not exactly the same because of the things I wrote in my last post. Top sus right now is S~V~S, other one I guess is Michelle.