The Syndicate

I voted.

Bye MM

I only have a tiny bit of time but want to say I will re-read DF but there are a few others I am looking at since the MM lynch.

so sorry I missed it all.

idk when I can be back. I will ask for a replacement if everyone prefers not to wait for me.

I voted MM. It seems he has escaped being lynched more than anyone. He is constantly discussed but never followed through. Seems like some saving happening where he is concerned.

No way llama was a baddie.
I would lay odds that Timmer was.

Just one gals opinion.

Also I voted Goodfellas as they use my favorite word the most in that film - plus it is quite an amazing movie. I probs would have liked Gangs better than I do but Decaprio is in it - so there ya go.

After catching I have realized that we should ALL re-evaluate our suspicions and thoughts. I know I was feeling dejected inre: to my own suspicions especially after Made1.0 was civ. With that in mind a few thoughts on everyone left.


Bebass - I am reading you as civ this game though you has stuck by his MM suspicion for days. I did agree with it a a day or so ago and I am even more sure how I feel about him (MM) now (see below) I feel like I can semi trust you.

Teeth - I know I can trust you.

BR - I wanted to trust you since the beginning but now I find myself wavering slightly. The thing about your posts that gives me pause is that you quote these quotes and then throw out a sentence(s) or a few words and it *seems* like you are indeed giving thoughts. I had not noticed until I went back and just read you. I also noted that you were one of the first people to drive home the point about a poss slip by TH yesterday. Though you questioned it more than once, and did seem to find it quite suspicious, you voted for MM even though *I* have been the only suspicion she has carried for more than a day. So you went from me to TH to MM. Way to cover your bases depending on how the tide was turning.

Canuck - More often than not I have found myself agreeing with you.

DF - I feel like you are playing a normal DF type of game. I read your posts as genuinely trying, especially this last round when you were questioning LC bc of llama's death. I look forward to hearing your thoughts on Dom, MM and me when you finish your reading. I also wonder if you still find yourself suspicious of LC? I find myself feeling trusty of LC and you so I would like to know why you do and do not find him suspicious.

Dom - I am feeling more trust than distrust at this time.

Lizzy/Made 2.0 - I was not trusting Lizzy since the beginning of this game. The few posts she made reminded me of her WIFOM Baddie play style. But since I was so wrong about you (Made1.0) I am gun shy about pushing Lizzy/Made2.0. I feel ok about letting you get back in the game and get caught up again before I decide how I ultimately feel about you.

LC - I see your wife has defended you as being civ more than once this game - how do you feel about that? How do you feel about her this game? I noticed you stayed out of the MM/TH lynch stuff yesterday and focused yourself on DF. Do you still feel the same about him as yesterday? Do you really think that DF would kill llama then be the first to bring it up - "gee llama is dead lets lynch LC" with that kind of talk? Do you think he is using wifom as a basis of doing this? Listen I was trusting you this game and I kind of trust DF so I would like to hear your thoughts about him since yesterday.

MM - I do not like how you are so dismissive to Bass about his suspicion of you. I also did not like how you are suspicious of me. It seems the "case" on me from you is based on my vote for AP and bc I was potentially saving Vomps. You, ofc, took it way out of context to make me look bad. If anyone was to go back and read AP up until his lynch they would understand why I voted the way I did. Sure at first he seemed normal but his vote, the timing and his lack of anything was totes out of character (even for him) and it really threw me for a loop and, in my mind, justified a vote for him. You also say I compared it to one of your votes and asked you why you were going to conform - well I wanted to know your reasoning as you had defended Vomps where as I did not really defend AP.

I think your other thing is wanting me to out myself or info and explain exactly why I was not lynched. Well do not hold your breath bc I will not be explaining that until end game. So you have made this big expansive deal about me over one vote and bc I won't directly out info to you? LOL ok. I am good with that.

One more thing you said I was giving you "no-u reactions to my suspicions" - quote please - I did not see any instances of this.
You are now back at the top of my list.

Rico - I have been very impressed with your style your first game. You seemed to try and give thoughts on everything that happens. I still say you have had a coach I am beginning to think you are being coached by a civ. Ofc I could be wrong but you genuinely seem to be wanting to try a baddie hunt as best you can being a nub.

sabie/AP 2.0 - I have absolutely zero opinion on sabie as she has barely been here. I think I take a wait and see approach here.

Daisy - Same as sabie. I really have no opinion on Daisy. The few posts she has I feel ok about - I would love to hear more from her.

SVS - I am having good feels where you are concerned. I think MM has been trying to push your buttons and his suspicion of you for days now and you are handling it way better than I would/could have. I do agree with quite a bit of what you say. I do think you were wrong when you said you though that MM was giving TH a platform, I also thought he (MM) was pushing TH's buttons as well. You noting that MM had gone back to check how much he had interacted with TH was a good catch imo. Why would any civ give a care how much they had interacted with any one player? They wouldn't. MM did care to note it. Do you still consider MM your top suspect?

Thats what I got and what I have time to give. Again so sorry it took so long but thanks for your amazing patience.

I am sorry to constantly make excuses but I am so sorry to Mongoose and the other players.

I have a free day tomorrow and will catch up proper (not just the last page) then and will give my thoughts and perspective.

I see it is MM or TH. MM has been riding me hard as well as TH though MM much longer even so I feel his heart is in the right place but he is just wrong about me. That said I went with TH, I am honestly trusting a couple of people this game so I will follow their cue.

I lied.
I have had no time to read back properly bc of my game and the insanity of tracking so much. I realize it is my own fault but I am asking to please give me a bit more time for me to get in a groove with my game.

I have voted Made and was shocked to see others are finally paying attention to his posts and that it is not just me.

Linky O.o

MM - I think I know what happened and I will not say more as it would just paint another target on a civ. I will say it was not role related on my part.

Bye Timmer - I sure hope your hand feels better soon <3

I am a bit behind and plan to do some reading today and will give my thoughts after.

Linky

*shake*

thellama73 wrote:

Turnip Head wrote:I'm feeling pretty good about Llama, I've got his name scribbled under my "Civvie Head Case" column. I think we should keep him around as a pet.

I may be hungry, but I sure ain't weird.

Lies!
llama do you know if Mongoose is ok?

Llama - if weren't sure about Ni and did not want people to follow you then why voice the suspicion and vote early? I am so glad to know that you are the only one trying to hunt baddies.
You have also vouched for 2 players more than once - Made and DFaraday. I was wondering why can so strongly vouch for 2 people so early in the game?

I think you are the reason the lynch went the way it did yesterday. I am asking you to reread my posts with an open mind - your original accusation of me is bc I was saving Vomps - which in a way I guess I was - but then went to I was WEIRD all capitalized like that. So what is weird?

thellama73 wrote:

Roxy wrote:One more time bc I really believe I am being srsly misrepresneted.

I KNOW no one was telling me how to play.
Llama, however, was saying that my votes look like a save of Vomps (which everyone now knows is false)
So in a sense he was telling me to "conform" and vote his way and if I did notI was suspicious (that is a lot of paraphrasing but it IS what was implied.
My WHOLE point was why should I conform and vote with everyone? Why can't I have my own thoughts about MY own vote?
And that he now considers weird.
I am playing weird bc I did not latch onto his Day 1 case. Tbs day 1 cases usually always lynch civs.

Yes this subject makes me uptight bc its right up there with telling people how to play. I will not be told how to vote or to play.
I will never be a conformist.

I am voting Made.

By this logic ANY vote record analysis is telling people how to play, since there is implied criticism of someone's vote choices. I hope you can see that that is literally insane.

Why are you being so extreme in your viewpoints? Did I say ANY vote record analysis? No I did not. As a matter of fact I didn't even mention voting analysis.

Stop putting words or intent into my posts that are not there.

What point are you trying to make? I stand by my votes. I made them with my judgement just like you did with your Day 1 Vomps case all the way through day 3.

There is a difference betwixt criticizing votes and analyzing them imo.

One more time bc I really believe I am being srsly misrepresneted.

I KNOW no one was telling me how to play.
Llama, however, was saying that my votes look like a save of Vomps (which everyone now knows is false)
So in a sense he was telling me to "conform" and vote his way and if I did notI was suspicious (that is a lot of paraphrasing but it IS what was implied.
My WHOLE point was why should I conform and vote with everyone? Why can't I have my own thoughts about MY own vote?
And that he now considers weird.
I am playing weird bc I did not latch onto his Day 1 case. Tbs day 1 cases usually always lynch civs.

Yes this subject makes me uptight bc its right up there with telling people how to play. I will not be told how to vote or to play.
I will never be a conformist.

I am voting Made.

thellama73 wrote:

Mongoose wrote:
Oh here's a video. The Academy's tribute to Kate Hepburn, the superior of the two Hepburns.

Um....flase.

No u

Canucklehead wrote:Can I take a really quick poll of how people are feeling about the following players? I'm planning to re-read them all before the end of the lynch, but I'd really like to be able to compare what I find with people's general impressions of them....

Bass, DF, Made, Rico, TH

Bass - I am feeling this is his civvie game.
DF - Iunno how I feel about DF. Its a bit too early in the game to expect much from which is normal for him but quite unfair to others.
Made - I feel like I have made my feelings on him apparent.
Ricochet - I do feel like he sounds as if he has bts help - which I have mentioned before but is it civ or baddie btsc?
TH - another iunno. He has been one of the few I have agreed with in this game although that lastpage betwixt TH,SVS and thellama have me second guessing myself where he is concerned. I just don't see the point he was trying to make about Teeth and the poll.

I look forward to your thoughts on these players as well.

Linky - llama how did you clear Made so quickly but held onto your Day 1 suspicion of Vomps for 3 days??

Voted some movies I adore! I have seen most of these - which is nice for a change this game

I had a feeling - bye Vomps.

I hope now people won't be so tunnel-vision-y.

Long Con wrote:Every lynch requires that we load one basket up with eggs, Roxy! I am in agreement with you about Metalmarsh, and I haven't quite tuned into the suspicion on Made yet, but I'm keeping my eyes open, worry not!

I could not disagree more. If we put al our votes on one person do we really learn anything? Lynches are the only tool a civ has to learn from.

What other reason have you given to find me suspicious except my votes?

You seem even more suspicious to me bc suddenly you are willing to conform and vote for vomps - someone you said was prob not bad but ofc today you see suspicion from Vomps lol. You voted others before this lynch - why, suddenly this lynch do you feel the need to conform and vote Vomps?



Llama - that is not true. I have asked should I conform to your suspicion just so I am not suspicious. That is not saying let me play my own way it is asking a serious question - should I stop hunting baddies and just go along with the crowd? No one is telling me howto play - I can tel the difference.

Dom wrote:

Roxy wrote:

Dom wrote:Roxy, do you think lynching Vomps is a good idea at all?

No

You see no value at all in his lynch?

The only value is what others have given it. I personally think we would learn just as much with a Made or MM lynch - their are some who have not even commented on Made and some who are quietly backing him up. As for MM he seems to be suspciousof everyone who did not vote for Vomps - except himself. Do you see value in everyone putting their eggs in one basket?
Should I vote for someone I am not as suspicious of as others just to conform? tbh that does seem like what a civ does - conforms.

Though I may change my mind to MM. The more he posts the suspicious I get.

DFaraday wrote:

Roxy wrote:

Dom wrote:Roxy, do you think lynching Vomps is a good idea at all?

No

So who would you rather go for, Roxy?

I think the evidence around Vomps continues to grow, and (as expected) Vomps is doing nothing to convince anyone otherwise. Hopefully this will at least shed some light, so... *votes Vomps*

Are you reading the thread or just asking this to "seem" involved?

I already stated who I will be voting for.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Roxy wrote:Llama - yes I understand my votes look bad but you are wrong when you say MP was not on my radar when in fact I said I thought Canuck had made some decent points - but - the top 3 vote getters last round were MP, Vomps and MM I had not read back on MP and bc I was unsure of my vote rather than use someone else's opinions/suspicions for my vote reasoning I like to use my own. Out of the 3 MP's game stood out the most bc this game he was very back track-y but in the beginning of Dr Who he was laser focused and unbending in his suspicions so I went with MP.
i am sorry but I have to play my own way. I can tel you in the 100's of games I have played I have never tried to save a teamie mostly I am one of the first to vote a teamie or even make the case myself - in other words I have never once voted to save a teamie nor have I ever defended one ofc this is all wifom but it is checkable. if Vomps was my teammate I would have been the first to make the case or held onto your coattails of suspicion.

Wow Timmer has done a swift back stroke there.

I am voting for my own suspicion today Made but I have time.

My mind has changed on Made. He's no longer on my radar.

Also, per the bolded part. I don't think a civvie would say that.

Gtk - I guess you have not played as much as I have if you have never seen anyone say that before.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Another things I saw. Roxy asked SVS the same question 4 times before SVS finally answered.

1) Here
2) Here
3) Here
4) Here

SVS has never mentioned Roxy (game-related) outside of answering that question.

Also, SVS might possibly be silenced today? Along with being removed from the lynch poll.

Yeah.......so?
Tbh this seem a bit premature considering that Vomps has not even been lynched and also you do not believe in the Vomps suspicion either you have avoided all the major vote getters and also avoided suspicion from others for it though now I am seeing what Bass has been saying.

I think since we have time others should look at your posts and vote record bc they read as if you have something to hide.

Are you suddenly suspicious of vomps enough to vote for him?

Dom wrote:Roxy, do you think lynching Vomps is a good idea at all?

No

Llama - yes I understand my votes look bad but you are wrong when you say MP was not on my radar when in fact I said I thought Canuck had made some decent points - but - the top 3 vote getters last round were MP, Vomps and MM I had not read back on MP and bc I was unsure of my vote rather than use someone else's opinions/suspicions for my vote reasoning I like to use my own. Out of the 3 MP's game stood out the most bc this game he was very back track-y but in the beginning of Dr Who he was laser focused and unbending in his suspicions so I went with MP.
i am sorry but I have to play my own way. I can tel you in the 100's of games I have played I have never tried to save a teamie mostly I am one of the first to vote a teamie or even make the case myself - in other words I have never once voted to save a teamie nor have I ever defended one ofc this is all wifom but it is checkable. if Vomps was my teammate I would have been the first to make the case or held onto your coattails of suspicion.

Wow Timmer has done a swift back stroke there.

I am voting for my own suspicion today Made but I have time.

I am so sorry MP but this game was so unlike your last civ game I just could not believe you were civ.

Damn!! Poor FZ I am so sorry you were deaded early - again.

So lemme get this straight -

I am suspicious bc I do not think Vomp is suspicious and bc I voted for people who I thought at the time were? GTK.

If there is something specific anyone would like to ask me I will be more than happy to answer bc the reasons given so far are based on conjecture and llama's Day 1 suspicion of Vomps..

llama - you did not even respond to the reason I did not vote for Vomps. If you were so concerned why wouldn't you have said something before now? Should I have just went along like a good little poppet and voted the way you like? I am sorry but that is not the way I play. And I know it is not the way you play. Give my posts a good long look I have nothing to hide - if you have any questions I will be happy to respond.

I still cannot believe no one is suspicious of Made's posts but me. He can throw down whatever reasoning for his style this game but I am not buying it. Anyone notice he is not concerned with voting records - I wonder why? Could it be bc he has none?

I have had a very busy weekend I will try and make more time this evening.

I voted MP and noticed it tied him with Vomps.
Sorry TH no one else seems to feel the way we do about Made. I hope he wil post soon so I can further prove my points.

Yes TH he is my strongest suspicion so far.

Took time to read MP

In the very beginning he was all up in arms about SVS use of OT to suss out baddies. There was talk of witch hunts and the like but eventually he backed down.

Then he was back and forth with llama about making assumptions on day 1 it was a silly read tbs but again I felt he backed down in the end.

Dom-gate - he had a big huge pages long back and forth with Dom saying he wasn't naming suspects even though in Dom's first response he states clearly he suspected llama and thought he had made that clear - well no need to detail the entire back forth but MP did say he thought it was distracting but HE CLEARLY brought it back up several times even asking what others thought of Dom - continuing the instigation then you know what happened? He backed fown.

He has continually said he thought Vomps was playing normal but now he is poss backing downand voting for him.

He had voiced suspicion of BR but only voted for her in a throw-away fashion that just felt like an easy way out last lynch. He did seem to back off of his suspicion for bit after tohers weighed in on his suspicion but then brought it back up and used it to justify his vote for her. to be fair he did keep saying "dang it I don't know what to do" during the lynch prior to his vote. he did explain that he does not know Vomps or AP that well so he voted where he felt the strongest - BR. Its a funny excuse bc he know Vomps and AP as well as any of us he has prob played the same number of games with them as me at least so do feel like he could make some sort of clearjudgement one way or the other as many other did.

After reading back I could very well see my vote going to MP .

Thoughts on people with votes

Vomps - I have said before idk Vomp's game the way llama claims to. I have played several games with him and for me he seems the same. His posts at the end of last lynch did give me pause. I have been wrong this game maybe I should trust others judgement but it is usualy not how I play.

MP - he has said quite a bit about a lot of players.It seems like he is trying to help find baddies. tbs MP is very difficult for me to read. I want to always trust him and SVS bc they are always so fun in a game and its always great to have them on the civvie side. I never had time to reread his posts s I really can't add anything more at this time. I just have not had the time.

MM - yes Bass has voted for him repeatedly citing that he seems to be defending a lot of players. He has defended players - the self voting AP and Vomp and a little bit ti Ricochet. I am not sure if that makes him bad or not tbh. I do think he is wrong in his no u suspicion of Bass. I am unsure about LC and as I have said I think of SVS as civ unless given a reason that twitches my nose. Those are his top suspects. After reading back on some of his posts I am left unsure about him.

I want to add something about Ricochet - while being in his first game I get the eagerness factor in responding to every post with your name in it and some that don't - you do have that "I have help" vibe but its hard to say if you are getting it from bts or the Hostess. I could see Mongoose putting you with someone for your first game the question is would she make you civ or bad bts?

So no one else feels the same about Made as I do which is where I want to vote. I am going eat some soup and think a bit.

S~V~S wrote:

Roxy wrote:SVS - I hope I was not the one who you thought was rude. I hate to even say this but you still have not answered my only question. I guess at this point it does not matter but I would have liked a response and your thoughts about the other people who used your reasoning for their vote for Teeth.

I cannot believe no one has one word to say about Made. I mean his play style is so unlike Python and so reminiscence of his baddie game.

Here is a linky to all his posts I would like to hear what others are thinking about his game.

BR - can you elaborate a bit more? You seem to be tossing a lot of names about without really backing up as to why you think them suspicious.

Sorry I missed it, and, no, I was not talking to you silly.

I thought I already commented on that, since no one else really seemed to have been in danger day 1.0 I don't see baddies piling on a bandwagon to get rid of someone who often plays a distracted game. Did you mean someone specific? On phone on bus so I can't really look back at this point. I can later if you like.

Maybe I just thought I posted it and just thought it Lol.

What do you think of them?

SVS - I gave my thoughts on them when I asked for yours the ssceond time Here

TH - he (Made) has posted since then.

Llama - again we will agree to disagree inre:Made. I have been baddie with him and his scatteredness reminds me of that game. Lemme tell you - I could not tell him what to post or how to post it - he played his own way.

SVS - I hope I was not the one who you thought was rude. I hate to even say this but you still have not answered my only question. I guess at this point it does not matter but I would have liked a response and your thoughts about the other people who used your reasoning for their vote for Teeth.

I cannot believe no one has one word to say about Made. I mean his play style is so unlike Python and so reminiscence of his baddie game.

Here is a linky to all his posts I would like to hear what others are thinking about his game.

BR - can you elaborate a bit more? You seem to be tossing a lot of names about without really backing up as to why you think them suspicious.

I feel I should tell everyone that I had asked to be replaced after what had happened in the GoC game but the next morning I realized it was just a knee-jerk reaction and I had hurt feelings (read:over-reaction) - again. So I joined back in which is why Mongoose then said she no longer needed a replacement. Sorry for causing anyone confusion.

Odd choice is right like others have said about Sabie. I also think her save was either a Role blocker or she saved herself which seems unlikely tbh.

I know everyone is still talking about vomps - which after what went down with him near lynch end last time I could poss vote this way.

SVS - I do see what others are saying and your posts have that dismissive tone to them esp noted it during your last interaction with Ricochet and in response to llama.You did not actualy address MP's questions and though I have asked twice you never responded to my question I have asked after Teeth was lynched. I would to hear from you and would like you to respond to my previous question even though it is kind of dated now. I could vote for you.

I however am still concerned with Made. He hasn't even bothered to mention my suspicion nor respond or acknowledge it in any way. I would vote for you.

Lizzy - whereforartthou?

I cannot focus at work and in this thread I will be back if/when the boss leaves.

we had to replace the chair at my desk bc it broke - it was over 15 years old - he told customers that my fat ass broke it - I have been a bit uptight since then mostly bc I do not have a fat ass and bc he is a real jerkwad

MP - how can SVS be second on your list bc of her Teeth vote? You do realize that she is the one who made the original case and vote against him, right?

Llama I see now.

TH - yeah but ot happens aa the time!

Thanks for the response MP

Also llama Canuck was not trying to lynch MM instead she was wanting to go for MP.

thellama73 wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:Llama, thanks.

I actually will echo a sentiment that you stated that S~V~S is on my radar now as well; when examining the reasoning that people voted BWT and AP, I found S~V~S's second most suspicious during BWT's lynch and most suspicious during AP's lynch. Even though she started the suspicion against BWT, I believe I counterargued her points rather well. In addition, the logical fallacy of incriminating AP based on MM defending him also struck me as suspicious.

However, I know how terrible I am at reading S~V~S, and I'm not sure I suspect her heavily at this point. But she is one of the few I am most watching and advocating for tomorrow's lynch, at the moment. I need to do more re-reading and analyzing, but off the top of my head, both of her D1 votes have struck me as possibly sketchy, but especially the second one.

So I'm not sure whether that helps or hurts your case, Llama, but it's my opinion nonetheless.

In my view, Canuck's excuse that there was "no chance" of MM being lynched, hence the vote for AP, will not fly in SVS' case. AP only had two votes when she piled on. She could easily have tried to get MM lynched instead. I am anxious to see what her reasoning is regarding this.

Lemme correct your facts - when AP, MP and Vomps all had 2 votes each *I* broke the tie to give AP 3 votes - I even made a post about it after I had voted.

Bye AP sorry for the part I played in your lynch.

The last film I saw was Pulp Fiction with my son yesterday - its as good if not better than it ever was.

Picked the first film on the list as I have not seen any of them.

Gonna catch up to see if I have anything to say before night ends.

Linky w/LC - I thought MP's vote yesterday was very odd and out of place even though he was suspicious of BR in a "no u" sort of way but I had thought he said he would not vote forher over ir - icr so I need to read back on MP as well.

Damn Vomps your are not helping yourself with your vote or posts.

Didn't realize my vote broke a 3-way tie. I feel good about my choice out of the other 2 with 2 votes each. (Vomps, MP)

I need to vote now bc my youngest son Nic is here and we are gonna watch Pulp Fiction -
My strongest ping so far is Made but no one seems too bothered by him I am voting AP I think the points are valid and between his vote, timing and lack of anything since the last vote is bewildering even for AP.

Spacedaisy wrote:Oh for the love, Alex just pointed out to me that the vote isn't until tomorrow night. Sorry guys. I was really confused.

The vote is today Alex must be messing with your mind :P

MP I said how I felt about FZ ^^^up there somewhere - how do you feel about her?

Thanks for the response TH and I hope so too

linky linky LOL @ Metalmarsh

Canuck - inre: your thought on AP - I never thought of it like that and usually just forget he is even playing. Great points you are making

I would not consider voting for AP until as Canuck pointed out he has literally avoided giving any thoughts at all after his self vote.

Oh yeah -

Made - this feels like his first baddie game we were teammates and he was posting different and oddly. I feel the same about him now. I am not following the suspicion he is giving. Maybe I have just misunderstood him but right now I do not get good vibes from him

LC - I have no clue so yeah.

BR - I feel you are just normal BR so far I find myself agreeing with you more than not.

I thinks thats all I have for thoughts from catch up

Hey everyone got off of work early thought I would try and catch up a bit.

Bebass - I know you were dead quickly in the Champions game but after your death things got quite heated for me at about the same time this game started. I said in the beginning not to expect a lot from me bc the Champions game had wiped out all my mafia brain cells. If you think I am suspicious for not posting thats fine I have nothing to hide.

Other thoughts -

llama - after you cleared up my initial question I was good with your response. I appreciate your honesty in saying that you didn't even notice Teeth had posted that at the top of his vote post. Does it clear you - not quite yet its but Day1.2 so I need a bit more time before handing my trust out.

MP/Dom - I think they both misunderstood each others intentions - at first - but then MP who says he felt distracted by it all asked everyone what they thought of Dom, himself and the points they were trying to make and it just felt like a baddie thing to do - to continue to push suspicion on Dom in a sneaky sort of way. If only one is civvie my guess is that it would be Dom. MP seems to want to continue on with this back and forth with Dom and imo it has been beat to death already.

Lizzy - I am still suspicious of but it seems nothing can come of it as she is not posting/playing right now.

Vomps - I think llama knows you better than I but I can't in good conscience vote for you just bc someone said so. Though it does not clear you all the way you now has my eye bc of some of the points llama has said. Does that make sense? I will be watching you mister!

SVS - I asked you what you thought of your vote followers previously here what are your current thoughts on them?

Timmer - you seem to be genuinely trying to stay current and give thoughts I feel neutral about you but as always I am watching you.

TH - your vote for Teeth did feel the most opportunistic looking back at your posts they do not give me the same vibe as your posts from the Champions game where I would have followed you to hell. I can't put my finger on any one thing its just a general vibe so nothing concrete to base a vote on but you have twitched my nose.

FZ - I feel like you are being genuine in your posts as well though others feel your vote was odd I do not. I know how you are on KSite and your vote for Teeth felt like something you would do. I have seen you do this sort of thing many times as a civvie.

When is the vote due bc I feel like I have forgot half of what I just read

holy fuck major linkitis will read after posting