The Syndicate

LOL, well played. Sorry I sucked.

a2thezebra wrote:Not really, I don't find you suspicious and town needs all the help we can get right now.

Seriously, can we lynch at least one of the Metalmarsh89, sig, and Bullzeye group? I said they were mafia a (real-time) week ago and not one of them has been lynched. Instead it's just been horribly justified lynch after horribly justified lynch and town has yet to learn its lesson.

linki - My response would be that your heart is full of shit. I would deem actual reason to be suspecting people for things that are actually alignment-indicative for once in the history of mafia. Take motivation into account instead of just "oh this is peculiar, that must be bad herp derp" and all that.

I'm so down to lynch sig, been wanting to for a while now. But you know, herp derp and all that bullshit.

a2thezebra wrote:I'm starting to like this idea more and more...
rabbit8 wrote:I quit. Just lynch me please.

Me too.

a2thezebra wrote:That comment made no sense sarcastically or otherwise.

Yes, I'm sure it doesn't...

Using sarcasm while praising people is not making fun of anyone.

Cheers for yours as well.

I don't really quit. But fuck I suck.

I quit. Just lynch me please.

DrWilgy wrote:
Serge wrote:I just want to point out that before the day ends that if the number of votes for one person almost reaches the remaining townie population then there is probably something wrong. Well, good luck town.
I agree with this #saveserge

Or something is really right?

If we're not wrong about serge, I'll be looking at wigs for possibly trying to get a counter wagon.

I also forget we can change voted, take that into account when you read my posts. I'm not used to it.

insertnamehere wrote:
rabbit8 wrote:I also never encouraged anyone to vote for you.

Wigs did.

Thought I might help you out with that assumption.

rabbit8 wrote:I could get down with voting INH. I had a feeling he might be bad early. Maybe the damn town we are fraking up is shtick?
This is what I was referencing

I know, no where did I encourage your lynch.

I did however get the reaction from wigs I wanted.

I also never encouraged anyone to vote for you.

Wigs did.

Thought I might help you out with that assumption.

I don't like Wigs vote for you, INH.

agleaminranks wrote:
Serge wrote:I think we should votr INH. If he's town, rabbit8 and DrWilgy are teammates. Boom.
Yeah, but this sort of lynching people for information policy is scummy as all hell.

Serge and rabbit are both advocating lynching for information. I think they might be teammates and trying to distance. I'm voting for Serge today.

No, I want to lynch sig because I think he's bad. I also want to vote for serge who I think is bad. I also want to vote for Zeebs who I think is bad.

I placed my vote where it would likely help one of those three get lynched, today..... Serge....

Bullzeye wrote:
Serge wrote:People really do love voting for me. I really wish I could play these games on a PC, this whole phone thing is throwing my whole game out.

I'm not really sure who to vote for anymore. I hope my vote this time around helps nail a scum. Who do I vote for, town?
This post rings super false. You hope your vote helps get a baddie? Goes without saying. Nobody who wanted to lynch a civ would openly admit it. Appealing to 'town' to tell you what to do and rid you of accountability also doesn't look great. You seem to do the same again here:

Serge wrote:I think we should votr INH. If he's town, rabbit8 and DrWilgy are teammates. Boom.
You want to vote INH because of Rabbit and Wilgy but if INH is civ then it's only Rabbit and Wilgy who are bad?

Damn straight....

Makes perfect sense.

Day 1 leetic voted for Serge, then Bass, then MM.

Why do you miss him, Serge?

DrWilgy wrote:
insertnamehere wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:I feel that a Quin or INH lynch would reflect heavily on the other.
Could you elaborate on why you think that? I honestly don't know if you think we're teammates or on opposite teams.
Nah.

Rabbit, I don't think voting Zebra is beuno right now. Perhaps we vote INH together?

Why?

I could get down with voting INH. I had a feeling he might be bad early. Maybe the damn town we are fraking up is shtick?

agleaminranks wrote:If anyone has been tunneling so far this game it's rabbit, even after the replacement. What's with the change of heart to Serge?

Something seems a little off.

Because no one but Quinn will vote sig?

Also...

rabbit8 wrote:
insertnamehere wrote:
rabbit8 wrote:Anyone got anything interesting to add?

I'm going to break this tie one way or the other. Is anyone else going to vote or change their vote?
I am yet to vote, and don't want to vote for anyone who currently has a vote.

Friend?

Serge? I have been rereading him. He is off to me. But I don't know about leetic. I have a strange feeling. But my radar needs tuning because of not playing in so long. So....

I will vote for Zeebs if anyone else will?

Serge

DrWilgy wrote:Rabbit. You civ?

Yes...

a2thezebra wrote:
Bullzeye wrote:My comment was clearly a joke, yours just looks like you're directly criticising the people who voted Bass. You don't even frame it as an accusation, just that they should have known he wasn't bad.
Your joke served no purpose, my criticism did not. And the underlined is true, what is your objection exactly? I'd like to hear from the people that voted Bass because I don't understand why they suspected him. It's not a criticism of them, but their actions. Is that not cool or what?

You never said why you suspected MM over sig or Leetic. Not once. So no reason given IMO. Just vote MM because of the same thing these two did.

a2thezebra wrote:I'm not tunneling anyone. I'm the one who opposed the horrible last two lynches. We need to lynch Metalmarsh89.

And you never opposed the Bass lynch, you claimed you did, but you didn't.

You switched you're vote at the end of the day, that's not opposing it.

You never opposed either lynch. You threatened sig with a lynch. But oppose, no.

That's lying, who does that?

a2thezebra wrote:For the record, I acknowledge some responsibility in Bass' lynch. I should've fought against it, but I was not online when Bass took the lead and before then I did not think he would get the lead. I should've fought against it anyway but what's done is done.

You helped with the bass lynch by voting for him then not saving him? You really felt the need to make this post because... ? Sounds like you're distancing your defense you never made from, what? Your vote of him that day? This is a weird defense for something you where never accused of..... I don't like it.

a2thezebra wrote:
leetic wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:I also think that sig is bad but I've been wrong about sig too many times to put my vote there...for now.
Why are you relying on meta reads? Keep this post in mind if sig flips scum.
I'm not relying on meta reads, I'm relying(?) on my failure to read a particular player.

No you're relying on not getting your teammate lynched with meta bullshit, I think. By saying you think he is bad you're covering you're bases, I think.

a2thezebra wrote:
sig wrote:Is there a reason to lynch MM?
Would you rather be lynched instead?

So, no reason. I couldn't find one you made regarding MM.

a2thezebra wrote:Let's lynch Metalmarsh89 already.

Still no reason.

a2thezebra wrote:I'm not tunneling anyone. I'm the one who opposed the horrible last two lynches. We need to lynch Metalmarsh89.

Yes, yes you are.

Serge wrote:Scum will try and get me lynched tomorrow. Or sig, if he's town. We're the easiest choices. Just remember that yesterday was a very easy lynch and I couldn't believe it went through. 3 players didn't vote and I'd be willing to wager at least one of those 3 is scum.

Bullzeye
Gleam
Metalmarsh

I'll be voting Metalmarsh tomorrow

How is a 3 way tie an easy lynch?

Serge....

Still think Sig too.

I'm moving my vote to sig. I could be persuaded to move it again....

I still want to vote for sig though, this role is mostly the same as my last, as in civvie/town....

insertnamehere wrote:
rabbit8 wrote:Anyone got anything interesting to add?

I'm going to break this tie one way or the other. Is anyone else going to vote or change their vote?
I am yet to vote, and don't want to vote for anyone who currently has a vote.

Friend?

Serge? I have been rereading him. He is off to me. But I don't know about leetic. I have a strange feeling. But my radar needs tuning because of not playing in so long. So....

Anyone got anything interesting to add?

I'm going to break this tie one way or the other. Is anyone else going to vote or change their vote?

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Ummm, hi.

Who's bad?

rabbit8.0 wrote:I'm thinking of looking into MP much more during the next day.

Draconus wrote:Effective immediately rabbit8.1 will be replacing in for MovingPictures07.

Thanks for at least trying to participate in my first game, MP. Good luck with your PHD program!!
And I was so looking forward to writing your death post.

Maybe me?

leetic wrote:You know what?

Since Epi suspected Serge and was nightkilled, and rabbit suspected sig and was nightkilled...

I doubt they're scum. They just seem like they're just too easy targets to be scum.

Meanwhile, MM has been passively joining the mislynch bandwagons...

Voting MetalMarsh.

Did you night kill me? I think you might have.

agleaminranks wrote:Argh, I cannot keep track of all these 2.0 players

Me either.

You son of a bitches........

a2thezebra wrote:
Bullzeye wrote:My comment was clearly a joke, yours just looks like you're directly criticising the people who voted Bass. You don't even frame it as an accusation, just that they should have known he wasn't bad.
Your joke served no purpose, my criticism did not. And the underlined is true, what is your objection exactly? I'd like to hear from the people that voted Bass because I don't understand why they suspected him. It's not a criticism of them, but their actions. Is that not cool or what?

You think all three players that voted for Bass are bad?

I'm thinking of looking into MP much more during the next day.

Makes much more sense that way.

Serge wrote:I didn't quote sig

I know, leetic did... I'll make big something that makes me

leetic wrote:Alright, I may be nightkilled on this phase, so I'll make a few wallposts. Here's an argument against Serge. I'm analyzing only his D2 here, since most of his D1 is meaningless banter.

sig wrote:SO Some good ole NKA (night kill analysis), Epi is a strong player which alone could explain his death, however he replaced into a weak situation he could've been mislynched at some point. So why kill him night 1?

He suspected Serge and leetic and spent a large portion of the day going back and forth with leetic. So I'm eyeing Leetic and Serge.

I'll be placing a vote for Serge now.
Also yes I know people will say it is scummy for me to build a case around someone being NK'd but that plus what Epi said about Serge and Serge's actions are enough for me to lay a vote out.
Okay, so he votes Serge, and provides some good reasons right?

Except, the situation he's describing is WIFOM at best. Scum could kill someone like Epignosis to incriminate the people he scumreads, and such a post would speed up the process. The fact that this is his only read that he puts any real analysis into doesn't help, as it suggests that that post is intended to help his agenda.

sig wrote:Good point while Epi did vote Serge his suspicion mainly stemmed from Leetic's defense of Serge. I'm operating under the assumption that Leetic and Serge are both mafia, since Leetic came in and defended Serge. However, I don't know Leetic's meta so he might just' have been defending Serge for the reasons he stated. So I'd rather at this point vote for Serge and if/when Serge flip mafia go for Leetic.

Though Leetic's vote for MP.

Bulls what do you think of MP wanting to policy lynch Dizzy and him voting for me?
Okay, so I defended Serge, so we must be scum, right? Except 1.) That's not what happened (I was opposed to a policy lynch and even voted Serge when he started displaying scummy behavior) and 2.) If me defending Serge makes me scumbuddies with Serge, then by extension sig defending me makes sig scumbuddies with me. Yeah, this seems hypocritical when you take his previous posts into account, but then again that may have been the intention (buddying with an analytical and potentially dangerous (to scum) player in hopes of making him look scummy).

sig wrote:Also I'd consider switching to Leetic but, I'd want to ISO him and don't have the time right now.
So yeah, that vote wasn't intended to be permanent from the get-go. Not only does that display a sort of planning into your votes, but it also reeks of distancing.

sig wrote:I was under the assumption you thought it was scummy of MP to want to policy lynch from your post?
Yeah, I'm just quoting this one to support my Serge/MP/sig theory.

sig wrote:I'm feeling good about Leetic right now, so I'll switch on over to Bass

linki: No U.
...Okay. So after two wallposts, you decided to back down and follow me. That post basically contradicts everything that he's said before that point. Plus, I had built momentum in that thread, so he was following a leader toward an easy mislynch. Another thing that I mentioned before, is that he provides no reason for any of this. I was his second biggest scumread before this post, and now I'm magically someone he's following. What.

I asked him several times to provide quoted posts to support his statements. He didn't provide any.

sig wrote:There is no good reason to town read me yet, but also no reason to scum read me.

Rabbit's post are nonsensical since they make no sense, he doesn't explain why he thinks I'm mafia at all and says I'm just talking in gibberish.
Well, that's too bad, I've came up with many reasons to scum read you based on your previous posts.

And with Rabbit, I feel that "they make no sense" is just a way to evade Rabbit's accusations.

Well, that's one player down. I'll make similar posts for Serge and MP, and maybe a couple of others (I'm willing to take requests!). I want to get all my analysis out now before I get nightkilled so town has all the necessary tools. Serge, watch out, because you're next.

I don't know man. That's strange to make a case off someone else's post, Leetic. But I see your overall point.

Just weird to me.

Serge wrote:You know, this would be easier if you all believe I'm town.

It would be easier if Leetic had not claimed this was case against you then proceeded to quote sig...

Not sure how I'm going to be able to read that...

lol, WTF.

Of the three votes I suspect leetic and Sig the most.

I'mavotesig.

leetic wrote:
sig wrote:There is no good reason to town read me yet, but also no reason to scum read me.

Rabbit's post are nonsensical since they make no sense, he doesn't explain why he thinks I'm mafia at all and says I'm just talking in gibberish.
I want evidence. Quote some of Ranbot's posts that support your statements.

Anyone that tells you there's no good reason to town or scum read them is a good lynch candidate, IMO.

sig wrote:There is no good reason to town read me yet, but also no reason to scum read me.

Rabbit's post are nonsensical since they make no sense, he doesn't explain why he thinks I'm mafia at all and says I'm just talking in gibberish.

Sure, you could say that if you're not reading my posts. If you actually read my posts you can see why I think you're bad.

He, sorry.

leetic wrote:
sig wrote:Zebra I'm making perfect sense Rabbit isn't making any sense.
Care to provide reasons?

She is bad and didn't want to be tied for the most votes....

sig wrote:I'm feeling good about Leetic right now, so I'll switch on over to Bass

linki: No U.

More gibberish and pointless vote switching.

sig wrote:Zebra I'm making perfect sense Rabbit isn't making any sense.

You're posting gibberish.

I'm willing to listen to good arguments for narrowing this lynch down, a lot.

a2thezebra wrote:I'll switch my vote to agleaminranks then, just for you.

Odd....

a2thezebra wrote:I'm not sure about you, sig. That was a pretty ridiculous question.

Right? Sig is bad though.

Like saying sig might have killed ika then accuses the players Epi was after for killing them makes no sense...... right.

sig wrote:SO Some good ole NKA (night kill analysis), Epi is a strong player which alone could explain his death, however he replaced into a weak situation he could've been mislynched at some point. So why kill him night 1?

He suspected Serge and leetic and spent a large portion of the day going back and forth with leetic. So I'm eyeing Leetic and Serge.

I'll be placing a vote for Serge now.
Also yes I know people will say it is scummy for me to build a case around someone being NK'd but that plus what Epi said about Serge and Serge's actions are enough for me to lay a vote out.

Or you killed him.

Votes Sig.

Search found 95 matches