The Syndicate

Ricochet wrote:D-did you understand the fear factor the other way around? :o It wasn't a win condition... it was a win canceller. You were meant to fight against it. If you misunderstood that, then it's no wonder you poked JJJ so much to vote you - I thought you were mad.

Ricochet wrote:

insertnamehere wrote:the sample is just at the beginning of the track if anyone wants to see for themselves.

He hasn't reached my End o' Night Host Post...

linki: warmer...

DrWilgy wrote:Let's kill INH...

If INH isn't bad we murderify JJJ ok?

DrWilgy wrote:@Quin because I trusted INH and SVS. In total that makes 3 players that were trusted.

I can confirm that both the players I trusted are civilian.

DrWilgy wrote:

sig wrote:post 6

I'm really confident JJJ isn't the cop, I'm slightly wary of him for hinting that he might be the cop, however I do think he is a civ even though he is trying to say he might be the cop.

I'll need to check him out some more before I decide for sure what I think about his alignment though, so expect me to say more on JJJ day 2 or 3.

You ready for this meme?

I'm the cop and INH was my green peek.

Ricochet wrote:

Ricochet wrote:Vaatekaapin korvaaminen orgoniakkumulaattorilla saattaa johtaa ongelmiin takuuvuokran kanssa.

http://vocaroo.com/i/s1IICIkdvQy9

Vompatti wrote:Could you guys make make a summary on the current nominees so I could place my vote without reading the thread? I am quite drunk at the moment.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

Vompatti wrote:Why do I have votes?

You care?

What the...
Holy cow, where are we?!
What's going on?!

who's there q.m.

Wait...

Hello?

We're seeing what...

I can hear you k

Oh, no, we're inside his head?
Eww!
What is he doing?
Augh, can't unsee!

please get out of my head k

You stop rubbing your thighs and get out of the bathtub!

k

I can't believe this...
This is so gross...

now what

I don't know, get us out of here. Maybe if you go out of the bathroom...

it's locked k

Where's the key?

there is none

What else is in the bathroom?

There's only a toothbrush and toothpaste, near the sink.

Why would we end up in your bathroom?

Idk probably because I have an issue with this k

You're afraid of toothbrushes?

no i'm afraid of my teeth falling k

Well then, brush them.

that's not really a good idea, the flouride inside it will harm the teeth

That's nonsensical.

it's actually quite scientific k

Look, just brush your teeth, to see that nothing bad will happen, and then we can move on.

k but I'm not going to end well

Waste of time, I tell ya...

I'm brushing them now k

Yes, go on now.

still brushing them

Honestly, of all the ideas that Ric-
Wait, what's happening?

brushnn brsuhnn

One of his teeth fell in the sink
Jesus Christ!
Hey!

brushshhh brsuhh

Hey, stop!

aii dun feeel errreee uuud

They keep falling!

ii fffnnk aaaiii fffeeefh aaarr fffaaaleeeennn daauwwwn keeeey

Make it stop!

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: linki: I began the game with a free peek on another townie. sig is town.

rabbit8 wrote:

insertnamehere wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

insertnamehere wrote:

G-Man wrote:

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Negative marks to everyone in single digit posts. More likely to be bad than the rest.

Bite me, angry bear boy. You do realize that, as of this post, your comment suggests that 8+1 of us are more likely to be bad than the remaining 5? That's a net so wide it's silly. Why not just say everyone not named JJJ is more likely to be bad? Or were you being cheeky there?


1.02

All of these imaginary systems that he just keeps coming up with just seem like him posturing to where he can come up with some justification to lynch just about anyone. If I wasn't already committed to voting No Lynch, he'd probably be my top candidate.

insertnamehere wrote:So, let me preface this by saying that I am by no means, an expert at coding. This was the first really big program that I've decided to make. It could work, it could not, I'm going to try and see.

I've created a program that goes into every poster's game history, specifically games where they were bad, and sees what their top phrases or words are. It then contrasts those with the top words or phrases from a persons post history when they were good. It then eliminates the words that were on both lists, leaving us with that person's tells. After that, it goes into this thread, and sees how many times someone uses words or phrases identified as tells. The higher that number is, the more likely chance you are to be bad. This was a bitch to make, and it's something I've worked on for a long time, a bit of a pet project if you will.

Now, of course, because of the limited sample size, the program is more likely to be incorrect these first few days, but, as more and more people post, I know more and more about their role.

To summarize, I'm the NSA now, bitches.

The reason why I find 3J suspicious is because he seems to be doing the same sort of thing that I did in that game, where I was a chaos independent.

You think JJJ is independent or bad? I don't know is Chaos Independent was a role or alignment.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:VOTE POLO

This game thread is tiny. I want your thoughts.

4

Wilgy, I meant fist fight. Rumble in the jungle. What do you think of sig, Scotty, and S~V~S?

Epignosis wrote:

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

What do your language sensors tell you about three uses of the word "just" in one sentence?

I would know about that. What am I, some kind of language expert?

What I do know is that of INH's seven posts, three of them are in disagreement with you, and two of those three come across as annoyed with your activity, characterizing it as "ridiculous" and "imaginary systems." That, to me, is an unexpected reaction coming from someone who is fond of ridiculous and imaginary strategies that sometimes even work for him.

He's accused you of posturing and called you his top suspect, but he's married to an unproductive lynch. But what is the purpose of having a top suspect and claiming you are "committed" (his word) to voting no lynch? That's...um..."posturing" (also his word).

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

What do your language sensors tell you about three uses of the word "just" in one sentence?

Epignosis wrote:

insertnamehere wrote:

G-Man wrote:

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Negative marks to everyone in single digit posts. More likely to be bad than the rest.

Bite me, angry bear boy. You do realize that, as of this post, your comment suggests that 8+1 of us are more likely to be bad than the remaining 5? That's a net so wide it's silly. Why not just say everyone not named JJJ is more likely to be bad? Or were you being cheeky there?


1.02

All of these imaginary systems that he just keeps coming up with just seem like him posturing to where he can come up with some justification to lynch just about anyone. If I wasn't already committed to voting No Lynch, he'd probably be my top candidate.

insertnamehere wrote:So, let me preface this by saying that I am by no means, an expert at coding. This was the first really big program that I've decided to make. It could work, it could not, I'm going to try and see.

I've created a program that goes into every poster's game history, specifically games where they were bad, and sees what their top phrases or words are. It then contrasts those with the top words or phrases from a persons post history when they were good. It then eliminates the words that were on both lists, leaving us with that person's tells. After that, it goes into this thread, and sees how many times someone uses words or phrases identified as tells. The higher that number is, the more likely chance you are to be bad. This was a bitch to make, and it's something I've worked on for a long time, a bit of a pet project if you will.

Now, of course, because of the limited sample size, the program is more likely to be incorrect these first few days, but, as more and more people post, I know more and more about their role.

To summarize, I'm the NSA now, bitches.

G-Man wrote:

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Negative marks to everyone in single digit posts. More likely to be bad than the rest.

Bite me, angry bear boy. You do realize that, as of this post, your comment suggests that 8+1 of us are more likely to be bad than the remaining 5? That's a net so wide it's silly. Why not just say everyone not named JJJ is more likely to be bad? Or were you being cheeky there?


1.02

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

Scotty wrote:

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:People who have posted so far that have made me feel nothing positive (or negative, necessarily): INH, Scotty, DrWilgy, G-Man.

Sorry bout it. Day 1's gonna day 1. I don't know how you can look at a person's initial posts and deem them one alignment or another. This isn't a criticism. Merely a skill that I don't possess. If I look at patterns, and what makes a person "civ" or "Mafia" based on effort and tone in the first day, I'll probably be a better Mafia player.

I suppose you already know my preference of voting day 1.

I'll make an assertion that may or may not be correct (you know you better than I know you) based upon a feeling I have about most players in general. I bet that when you read early game posts, even those that seem quite minor, you still have an instinctive reaction of some kind. I suspect that it's not about you struggling to have a reaction, but rather you struggling to respect your reaction. To have a great deal of confidence in anything on Day 1, or in this case on Day 0, is impossible for any honest player. Still, confidence isn't the objective right now. Why not give those little twitches a chance to be free? Why not throw them into the game thread with reckless abandon and see what happens?

It's never going to be enough to condemn someone or to place complete trust in someone, but who cares? Let it ride, man!

Ricochet wrote:

insertnamehere wrote:Yay game

Just a note, for the next week or so, I'll be phone posting, so I may not be as active as I usually am.

I am legit scared by your avatar. What is that?