The Syndicate

To anyone interested in game AI, there's this potentially interesting competition going on k

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Vompatti wrote:In this moment I'm thinking about learning SFML because it's supposed to be faster than SDL and I love Bjarne Stroustrup in an erotic way.

Do it.

k

In this moment I'm thinking about learning SFML because it's supposed to be faster than SDL and I love Bjarne Stroustrup in an erotic way.

If you pay for proprietary software, you're no better than the people who license it.

// Templates in C++ are mostly used for generic programming, though they are
// much more powerful than generic constructs in other languages. They also
// support explicit and partial specialization and functional-style type
// classes; in fact, they are a Turing-complete functional language embedded
// in C++!

raspberries are tasty

I've been reading A Tour of C++ by Bjarne Stroustroup and listening to some of his lectures and it seems that C++ is a lot less ugly when used correctly, for example the templates remind me of type classes in Haskell and the memory management seems cleaner and less complex than in plain C.

It seems that Ruby is one of those languages that forces you to use objects?

Vompatti wrote:Immagona try to make my next album with csound-expression k

and here it is k

A Person wrote:

Fetch wrote:If anyone would like to learn to program in assembly for a fictional 80s computer, I recommend the game TIS-100 k

I probably cxan't afford that

it's sometimes on sale or you might even find it for free if you know what i mean

A Person wrote:

Vompatti wrote:

A Person wrote:

Vompatti wrote:

A Person wrote:

Vompatti wrote:

A Person wrote:Here is a site that has some courses for practicing with, for people who are new to prograrmming.

Does this have something more than just memorizing syntax, q.m. I started the C++ one and it seems codeacadaememy-flavoured.

Not really, it mostly seems like a better made codecademy

oih

u r 2 advanced k

ture ;ä*(

woudl ouo believe me if i todl you i should prolablblbly be learning functional reactive progogmramming , q.m.

heck yeah i would

i hsould be learning more functional stuff, and also some more machine learning stuff I was doing

You hsould make a funcktional Skynet™ k

A Person wrote:

Vompatti wrote:

A Person wrote:

Vompatti wrote:

A Person wrote:Here is a site that has some courses for practicing with, for people who are new to prograrmming.

Does this have something more than just memorizing syntax, q.m. I started the C++ one and it seems codeacadaememy-flavoured.

Not really, it mostly seems like a better made codecademy

oih

u r 2 advanced k

ture ;ä*(

woudl ouo believe me if i todl you i should prolablblbly be learning functional reactive progogmramming , q.m.

A Person wrote:

Vompatti wrote:

A Person wrote:Here is a site that has some courses for practicing with, for people who are new to prograrmming.

Does this have something more than just memorizing syntax, q.m. I started the C++ one and it seems codeacadaememy-flavoured.

Not really, it mostly seems like a better made codecademy

oih

A Person wrote:Here is a site that has some courses for practicing with, for people who are new to prograrmming.

Does this have something more than just memorizing syntax, q.m. I started the C++ one and it seems codeacadaememy-flavoured.

If it's for statistics your should probalbly learn R instead.

I love Haskell in an erotic way.

Immagona try to make my next album with csound-expression k