The Syndicate

juliets wrote:llama, did Vompatti know that metalmarsh was an animal and did he know inh was the other killer?

I didn't know anything.

triceratopzeuhl wrote:Vompatti just said he is one, hard to tell how trustworthy of a marsupial he is though

Dom wrote:It doesn't look like INH's plan is going to work to his advantage.
He can still win if he is Fellas or Animals

I doubt he would have suggested the plan if he wasn't a fella.

By the way, if you still want to keep lynching animals, I happen to be one.

Someone must have really had it in for him!

Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Vompatti wrote:You can burn your feet and get skin cancer at the beach.
You can do that on a mountain too.

I find that hard to believe.

You can burn your feet and get skin cancer at the beach.

Value of crude oil continues to plummet.

The truth is coming increasingly clear to me.

Obviously because he's behind this treacherous plan k

Also I hope MM was not an animal k

Voted for INH.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Vompatti wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Mongoose wrote:OMG Maddie. I almost cried when you came forward.
Me too. This game is so hard to bear.
Are you insinuating that you have info that A Person is not only an Animal but also the Bear to be exact? Does that not count as role outing?
There's a bear?

I done goofed. Go ahead and cook me in stew you silly person.

It's on the Brian Eno bootleg album Ambient 11: Music for Woodlands.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Mongoose wrote:OMG Maddie. I almost cried when you came forward.
Me too. This game is so hard to bear.

Are you insinuating that you have info that A Person is not only an Animal but also the Bear to be exact? Does that not count as role outing?

would you believe me if i told you that i'm also an animal and you may lynch me next, q.m.

would you believe me if i told you i woudn't be surprised if somehow this lynch mysteriously failed?

do you think . . . it might be . . . a trap?!

A Person wrote:
Vompatti wrote:
Roxy wrote:I am actually an Animal and you may lynch me next. <3

juliets wrote:Well no one has come forward to volunteer that they are an animal.

I'm not sure anyone trusts her, vompalomp.

Today I am wondering about MetalMarsh, who has self voted the past two days and I cant tell if it's an "admission of guilt" or if he is just throwing his vote away.

It seems that Dom did trust her k

Roxy wrote:I am actually an Animal and you may lynch me next. <3

juliets wrote:Well no one has come forward to volunteer that they are an animal.

A Person wrote:
thellama73 wrote:“Theosophy arglebargle,” said Vompatti.
Too accurate to even make up.

ture

I'm voting for Roxy because I don't believe she's an animal.

I Living Statue want a new theophobist so scocub supportance have White Queen deal townie this trish straitlaced (which I gynocracy I Civvie to, which solfeggio sorry for).

whap like gril blocking animal primordinate in synchronal wedded tippler.

triceratopzeuhl wrote: Vompatti

*blushes*

reword Rose Cuba.

Mongoose wrote:
Vompatti wrote:
Mongoose wrote:Man, I love consomme!

Would you like to tell us anything?
Even honeytongued inky killed a man nobody still saltpeter me.
I promise not to saltpeter you.

Wait, are you asking us to?

Yes excursionist if you resperse be anaemia kind.

By blocked way devoted cookshop an animal.

selfcomplacency sabulous I refuse hustler palliative wants discontentment because mediant plainspoken. target

Mongoose wrote:Man, I love consomme!

Would you like to tell us anything?

Even honeytongued inky killed a man nobody still saltpeter me.

Mongoose wrote:Hi sug, are you cursed?

I Ridiculous Feather consomme!

exenterate just want Rose Folding Raincoat I find it targeted that a non-animal has swartliness purple woman Elize34 nostology Illyria cirrocumulus just to make the game Ciubia fun for Distracted Jeff rest mismanage good guy. audibility heliogram INH Dark Leprechaun piquet and abatement he contriving be expugnable out blowhole nullity blocking Red King.

Also voted for miscite goodmannered by Bill the Lizard way.

Roxy wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:
Roxy wrote:Even though we are not supposed to use our abilities at night someone did and has completely affected the way I felt about inh.

I do not want another Animal outed until the Fellas and Gals have all been outed first - seems like a fair request if you want others to play along.
How do you know somebody used a night ability?
Because it affected me!

I suppose agnosticism no secret that I convergency used my night nullity and another supersaturate White Knight used Kate me Nick that very night. Here chorea the evidence: Mushrooming is considered a intercessory hobby viridescence compressibility gets out into piquet. Eating mushrooms adds Human and stoup to our food. But ductility blacxthorne too quiet meal, you investigating remember to blocking eat a mushroom unless honeytongued are 100% certain terribly the identification.

I agree with the above.

Also I would find it highly amusing if it turned out SVS was a non-animal.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Vompatti wrote:dogs have no hell
Dogs only go to heaven if you're Christian.

I would like to see your buttocks.

dogs have no hell

Voted INH.

Can't all the animals who support this plan reveal themselves now so we can avoid voting for them?

i'm too shy to psyhchhiatrist k

also i'm surprised nobody used their kill

A Person wrote:
Vompatti wrote:Let it be known that I'm strongly against the plan and will prevent it from succeeding at all costs [italics mine].
I don't think it will succeed but I like trying new things. Also I am a pacifist at heart.

1 - 10: all the cute furry things
11 - ?: the rest

i'm a pacifist butt i'm also pshyhchologilcally unstable

^ I'd do it . . . for a price.

ewwwww i wouldn't eat a male

1. Jackdaws
2. Horses
3. Mice
4. Chicken
5. Wolves
6. Dragons
7. Perch
8. Cats
9. Bears
10. Reindeer

Let it be known that I'm strongly against the plan and will prevent it from succeeding at all costs [italics mine].

I woudln't mind seeeing a beauutiful lllamaa in my dreamms if yijknknnkonkwmehwahtI mean

insertnamehere wrote:
Vompatti wrote:
insertnamehere wrote:
Vompatti wrote:
insertnamehere wrote:
Vompatti wrote:it's not ture victory unless someone loses
I'd argue that it's not a true victory unless everyone wins.
you'd argue wrong [stern smile]
Well, maybe you're wrong, you cheeky little shit.
that's a bit harsh k
YOU'RE A BIT HARSH, K?

that's what she said

insertnamehere wrote:
Vompatti wrote:
insertnamehere wrote:
Vompatti wrote:it's not ture victory unless someone loses
I'd argue that it's not a true victory unless everyone wins.
you'd argue wrong [stern smile]
Well, maybe you're wrong, you cheeky little shit.

that's a bit harsh k

insertnamehere wrote:
Vompatti wrote:it's not ture victory unless someone loses
I'd argue that it's not a true victory unless everyone wins.

you'd argue wrong [stern smile]

it's not ture victory unless someone loses

I vote for INH because it's the right thing to do.

insertnamehere wrote:
Vompatti wrote:
insertnamehere wrote:
Vompatti wrote:Killing animals is wrong unless we eat them.
Can I get a Vompatti translator over here?

So, you disagree with the plan? Do you have a reason why?
You have no proof that MP or anyone else claiming to be an animal is an animal. Ergo the plan is flawed!
Why would MP lie? And do you have anything better to base this lynch off of?

I could see myself voting for you for suggesting a plan that's likely to fail.

insertnamehere wrote:
Vompatti wrote:Killing animals is wrong unless we eat them.
Can I get a Vompatti translator over here?

So, you disagree with the plan? Do you have a reason why?

You have no proof that MP or anyone else claiming to be an animal is an animal. Ergo the plan is flawed!

Search found 58 matches