The Syndicate

*votes Timmer again*

Scotty wrote:

DFaraday wrote:

Scotty wrote:Wait, isn't this game 2v2 right now? How is this game still going? Didn't we already lose?

No more PRs. We lynch timmer, assuming the other baddie in DF and SD don't choose to Make it a 2-2 tie and flip a coin. Then it's 1-1 tomorrow. Is this all predicated on missing the night kill?

As far as I know there's no possible way Jessica Jones and Kilgrave haven't died, since all kills are revealed.

The way I see it going:

We lynch Timmer
Baddie kills one of us tonight
Last baddie vs. last civvie next day

I'm not sure why the baddies aren't going for a tie this time though. It seems like that would afford them the best defense since then they'd have a 50% chance of winning in this phase, whereas lynching Timmer means they definitely have to wait until next day phase.

Ok but

1 civ and 1 baddie means it's a coin flip in Endgame. How is that fair for either party? Is that a thing that happens?

I think so? I don't know as I've ever seen a game where it literally comes down to one civ and one baddie for the lynch (mainly because I tend not to follow games after I'm dead). I think that's typically how it's resolved, but I guess that's up to the host.

Scotty wrote:Wait, isn't this game 2v2 right now? How is this game still going? Didn't we already lose?

No more PRs. We lynch timmer, assuming the other baddie in DF and SD don't choose to Make it a 2-2 tie and flip a coin. Then it's 1-1 tomorrow. Is this all predicated on missing the night kill?

As far as I know there's no possible way Jessica Jones and Kilgrave haven't died, since all kills are revealed.

The way I see it going:

We lynch Timmer
Baddie kills one of us tonight
Last baddie vs. last civvie next day

I'm not sure why the baddies aren't going for a tie this time though. It seems like that would afford them the best defense since then they'd have a 50% chance of winning in this phase, whereas lynching Timmer means they definitely have to wait until next day phase.

Going with Timmer. I guess unless his teammates busses for that cred, we're at a 50% chance right now.

Epignosis wrote:

Elohcin wrote:well, I was going to and nor DF voted me too. what shall we do, Epi?

I drilled you.

In more ways than one.

If you're bad, then the evidence that you're good just outweighed that in my opinion.

People right now are being lazy.

DF?

The way Elo is playing doesn't strike me as a baddie, so I went with my backup Wilgy. As I've said before, I'm confident Timmer is bad but won't vote there yet.

I switched to Wilgy since Elo doesn't sound baddie in these recent posts. And apparently we're just doing whatever at this point, so why not.

Scotty, you admit that this is a LYLO situation, but you don't understand why I don't want to vote against the group at this point? Wilgy is far and away my third choice, but Epi made enough points on him that I at least don't feel good about him like I did early on. Having said that, I think both Timmer and Elo are strong candidates, but Timmer may be currently unlynchable.

Scotty wrote:There's a metric button of stagnation this game and I don't know if that should make me feel good or bad. Is this LyLo, assuming there is no doc in play?

I know who I want to vote, but want to hear from others so we can consolidate and not make the wrong decision.

I agree with this. We need to be on the same page at this point.

I was already suspicious of Elo, and that feeling is bolstered by Epi's case. I would be more keen on lynching Elo at this point, since if I understand correctly, if Timmer is Kilgrave he would survive again. I'm not sure about Wilgy at this point, but would be willing to vote there if the majority decides to (not something I like doing, but the numbers are tight right now).

EBWOP: Pretty much what I said above. If you're not the third baddie, I'm considering Scotty. I guess everyone else is civ to me.

From what I've gleaned through a quick look over the thread, I would be most supportive of an Elo or Scotty lynch. Elo, for bandwagoning, and Scotty for trying to push a Wilgy lynch. I don't see any reason for Wilgy to be up for lynching. DDL looks good to me right now as well. Daisy is reading very neutral to me, like usual.

*Sits up suddenly*

WOT HOPPEN?

Scotty wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Scotty wrote:still in Canada. So far removed from the election. I might stay here lololol

Uh why can we still vote?

I see indi died. Rip. Is there a poll thread somewhere, for I'm assuming the final tally didn't look like it does now.

Based on this outcome, I still feel INH is bad, and MM may be his teammate.

But I have no polls to analyze. So...no real case but gut reads.

Where is everyone? It's like the Wilgy show (a cousin to the Itchy and Scratchy Show). And I don't see Wilgy as bad right now.

There's not much to analyze in yesterday's poll. I think timmer took like 2 votes?

Nah, there's always something to analyze. And I'm sure that's not all. Wilgy even said he jumped on Epi over INH. And I see DF placed a vote there too. Did he say why?

Yes I did. I felt INH's case on Wilgy seemed forced, and I didn't like the Indi bandwagon forming.

I also don't like how Timmer and MM are all ready to vote Epi. Like he said, he can't make anyone follow him. I'd be more suspicious of players just jumping on the wagon rather than the guy who first started it.

I don't really see any substance to the Indiglo case. Looking back over INH's posts, his comments directed towards Wilgy don't sit right with me. He's calling out Wilgy for being intolerant of other people's play styles, but making his case on Wilgy for that same reason. It kind of felt like he was looking for an excuse to vote Wilgy to me.

*votes INH*

I guess it depends on whether powers were randomly assigned or not. If they were, then Timmer being Ruben is plausible to me. I agree with Scotty that I think it was more likely a result of civ activity than a baddie who can survive lynching.

I also don't see why Epi should necessarily be suspicious for his early, reasonless vote. It's not like he has a track record of doing that as a baddie. I don't feel civ about him per se, but that vote alone isn't enough to ping me.

Wilgy, why was I orange in your list?

Oh, I guess it ended at 3:12. Yeah, I was way off.

I'm so sorry Zebra. I thought it ended at 5:12 Central Time. It absolutely won't happen again.

I would have randomized though.

Scotty wrote:

insertnamehere wrote:is character claiming allowed?

Yo, I'm sure baddies received an alias so it doesn't become unbalanced if everyone just outright claims. That you are readily claiming a character makes me suspicious of you.

I've been in games around here where everyone character claims right off the bat. I don't like it, but I don't find anyone suspicious for it.

Scotty wrote:

indiglo wrote:I am also here! (I think.) I'm pretty sure. Does it look like I'm here?

Also, yay game!


Scotty, this is a show about someone who made a mafia game that I single handedly won with my superior playing skills, beguiling charm and incredible good looks.

Or maybe I'm getting it confused with another show.

Oh cool! How do I win this if you already single-handedly won it?

Indiglo didn't say that the show was about this Mafia game, so you are still eligible to win this one.

DrWilgy wrote:

DFaraday wrote:Wilgy, is MM your teammate? I mean, that worked out well for us last time.

Hey DF. You bad?

I am not.

Wilgy, is MM your teammate? I mean, that worked out well for us last time.