bea wrote:
Dom dom!
a) re: FZ - she's reading fairly genuine to me thus far. She messed up pretty big re: roxy and I in the last ksite game I played, but she's that kind of player. She goes with what she sees. Passionatly. And the ksite style is different from here. Those of us that have played in both worlds, I do truely believe it affects the way we play on the "not home" sites. (except for maybe rox and splintsy - they are weird anomolies) Correct me if you think I'm wrong FZ.
I'm not sure what you're trying to argue here. This is twice that FZ has used two different sets of logic in similar situations without real reason, one time she found me suspicious for it. Do you see what I found concerning there?
I'm not sure what you are trying to say here-- ignore FZ?
bea wrote:b) re MP: *tee-hee* - BUT - he raises a fair point. You were BAD BAD BAD in Who and you played a perfect game as a baddie that due to circumstances beyond your control, by process of elimination, you were found out. I'm as weary of early trust toward you as I am early trust toward MP tbh. MP feels more open minded than he usually does regardless of alignment during this game. It makes me *want* to trust him. Maybe he learned a thing or two. But it doesn't mean I do quite yet - I don't quite trust you yet either. Would you expect it any other way with us?
I am slightly annoyed that MP called ME out in particular when others had received comparable votes-- and wowee! look who just HAPPENED to received SO many votes thereafter!
I have no reason to trust MP. His suspicions have been wrong and I haven't seen anything I'd call the hallmark of civvie MP yet. Do I think he's bad? Not really. Do I trust him? No.
But he only calls me out when LC has comparable votes? That makes me think-- why does he not want ME to get the wand.
bea wrote:c) re: elo - I think her vote for me was made from the best possible place. I have no reason to distrust her. I don't think she was doing it because she didn't want to be held accountable. I think she voted for the person she most trusted.
What do you think of her vote for Zeek?
bea wrote:d) re: your votes. In the first champions game, there was a similar scenario about this time in the game. It was a shield though (I don't remember what it did, but I do remember that who held it came into play later in the game.) I was voted in that game to recieve it first. Outside of BDH/Diggz - the other votes I recieved kinda sketched me out. This early in the game, does it worry you that people are putting that much trust in you? Do you get paranoid that there are baddies kissing up there? Because when I was in that spot. I did. Like lots.
I actually addressed this earlier, with MP. He seemed MUCH less worried about me getting the wand then. I don't particularly care if I get it, but I think MP might have manipulated you all into giving it to him. He is, far and away, the winner here. No one seems to question the trust of MP, but MP certainly started the talk about why are people trusting
me. I'm going to be honest, the way MP played this has given me the idea that he might be trying to get me lynched here.
S~V~S wrote:
MP used to be the king of analysis & appraisal. I think he had more time back in the day. He jumps to conclusions more than he used to, bad or good, such as suspecting people due to slips. Like I do always, lol. That big post felt like old MP to me. Analytical and thought out (even though it was not correct re Llama). But the jumping on baddie slips etc. is not the style I always associated with MP, although admittedly it IS the style he has been playing in more recently, true. We all evolve.
Linki, yeah, I am not sure what anyone means by "staunch trust of Dom". I tend to have a total blind spot re Dom, and he is still up in the air for me.
TBH, I'd like to keep it that way (in general, not just you).
Keeps me safe, regardless of who I am.
I agree with your analysis of MP-- but I haven't seen that as much as you. I agree he used to be much more analytical and appraisal-based. I haven't quite seen it. Doesn't mean I won't.
nijuukyugou wrote:As I was reading, it seemed that those who voted for Dom expressed a confidence that I hadn't seen in the game until this poll came along. I believe others expressed this curiosity, as well. Perhaps I am overthinking/overreading? (Is that a word? It is now)
Linki @ Bea - Give me a bit to answer your questions - I am smelly from running and need a shower (not ignoring you
)
Where have people justified their trust of MP? LC?
Why are people ONLY questioning the trust (that 3 people have) in me, and not in LC or the apparently the trust 9 people have in MP?
S~V~S wrote:Bea, I am always wary of LC. LC taught me alot about being a baddie. My first reaction when I read the big post he made about not killing me the other day was, "Awww how sweet". My second reactions was, "Oh shit, I am dead, LC is gonna kill me". But that was just for a second.I pay a lot of attention to LCs tone, and I have not seen anything that worries me. At this stage I don't fully trust anyone, but when I man=de my wand vote, I waffled a bit between LC & MP. I waited to answer this until night was "over" ha ha. Why give anyone ideas?
Although personal reads etc. will have less & less bearing as we go along due to Tyler.
Do you remember what LC was in Dexter Mafia?
You reminded me of something here.
That was what my comment about being in a knife fight with The Pope was about.
I'll grant that you are 100% sure of your own alignment, but what makes you "pretty sure" of Bass being Civvie? I mean, I don't suspect him for anything in particular, but that's very different from being "pretty sure" that he's Civvie. Your statement gives me the 
You're right, statistically speaking, both of us would be more likely to be bad.
Interesting catch!
