The Syndicate

fingersplints wrote:How is it not true? This I literally your first mention/interaction with me:

Dom wrote:

fingersplints wrote:TH: Because I don't agree with your points on someone it does not mean I thought you were bad. I thought you were wrong, but that you had good intentions. I was looking forward to discussing Dom with you more before you were killed. I had reread him some from other games and I became less confident about him being a civvie. That suspicion seems to have dropped off anyways
Now I don't get the same feeling about you having good intetnions. I wouldn't say I suspect you yet. Hopefully the results of this lynch will help me decide about a few people.

This reads rather contrived to me.


What games didyou read?

fingersplints wrote:I'm not playing the victim. This just isn't productive. You have been on my ass since the second I said I wasn't so sure you were a civvie anymore. I never said I was surprised. Perhaps you should stop putting words in my mouth.

Bass_the_Clever wrote:Voted.

fingersplints wrote:

Dom wrote:

fingersplints wrote:

Dom wrote:

fingersplints wrote:
I'm probably voting Bass. I feel alright about the Wilgy vote though. like I said this seems more like his baddie game vs what I saw when I hosted him. I was hoping to reread the game this reminds me most of (90's Mafia on jtm) but haven't had a chance to, and seems it probably won't be necessary at this point.

What?

If Wilgy doesn't flip the way I think he will-- you might be my next vote.

"Wilgy is probably bad, but I won't vote there."
Why?
To avoid having responsibility for his death.

IDK highly contingent on Wilgy's allignment, but this post stank to me.

Umm except I did vote him before you gave me the eye, and already explained why I was reluctant to vote for him.

fingersplints wrote:

Dom wrote:

fingersplints wrote:
I'm probably voting Bass. I feel alright about the Wilgy vote though. like I said this seems more like his baddie game vs what I saw when I hosted him. I was hoping to reread the game this reminds me most of (90's Mafia on jtm) but haven't had a chance to, and seems it probably won't be necessary at this point.

What?

fingersplints wrote:
I'm probably voting Bass. I feel alright about the Wilgy vote though. like I said this seems more like his baddie game vs what I saw when I hosted him. I was hoping to reread the game this reminds me most of (90's Mafia on jtm) but haven't had a chance to, and seems it probably won't be necessary at this point.

Turnip Head wrote:

Dom wrote:

Bass_the_Clever wrote:

Dom wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Why aren't we lynching timmer anymore?

timmer

I never fully understood the case against him. So

Who do you trust and not trust ?

I'm feeling good about Golden, I think. I'm looking at you, FS, and Wildgy. I'm on the fence about most players.


This however, STILL does not answer the question I asked you.

What makes you feel good about Golden?

I agree with you about splintsy and to a lesser extent Bass. What do you see in Wilgy? He's a bit of an enigma to me.

Bass_the_Clever wrote:

Dom wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Why aren't we lynching timmer anymore?

timmer

I never fully understood the case against him. So

Who do you trust and not trust ?

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Why aren't we lynching timmer anymore?

timmer

Bass_the_Clever wrote:

Dom wrote:BAss, since you're around-- want to respond to this?

Dom wrote:

Bass_the_Clever wrote:

Turnip Head wrote:My main beef with Bass is his posts during the Canuck vs juliets lynch. Here are his only two posts from that Day:


3:37pm

Bass_the_Clever wrote:Sorry haven't been around . I'm catching up now.

9:12pm

Bass_the_Clever wrote:I ag ree I think juliets and canuck are both wroth lynching but I think Canuck is where my vote is going tonight.

What pings me is that he didn't justify why he chose Canuck over juliets when the lynch was 8-5 in juliets' favor when he voted. If he had said why he voted that way I would feel better, but it looks like a save. If he thoughts juliets was worth lynching, why didn't he vote for the frontrunner? There's also a 6 hour gap between when he said he was catching up and when he voted with nothing in between, which makes it feel like he was intentionally trying to stay out of the discussion that Day.

He doesn't have any on-topic posts since that vote. He just votes in the night polls.

Basically I'd like to hear from Bass about why he voted the way he did.

I voted that way because more people I trusted voted that way and I wasn't keeping up as much as I should have been.

OK so you have people you trust?
So.. ergo.. you have people you don't trust... people you think are bad?
Who are they?

I would say my vote was based on people I trusted more then people I didn't trust. Like I trusted HB I trust SVS . I wasn't sure about mac or MM so that's where I am.

Tranq wrote:I think Bass sounds genuine.

Dom wrote:

Bass_the_Clever wrote:

Turnip Head wrote:My main beef with Bass is his posts during the Canuck vs juliets lynch. Here are his only two posts from that Day:


3:37pm

Bass_the_Clever wrote:Sorry haven't been around . I'm catching up now.

9:12pm

Bass_the_Clever wrote:I ag ree I think juliets and canuck are both wroth lynching but I think Canuck is where my vote is going tonight.

What pings me is that he didn't justify why he chose Canuck over juliets when the lynch was 8-5 in juliets' favor when he voted. If he had said why he voted that way I would feel better, but it looks like a save. If he thoughts juliets was worth lynching, why didn't he vote for the frontrunner? There's also a 6 hour gap between when he said he was catching up and when he voted with nothing in between, which makes it feel like he was intentionally trying to stay out of the discussion that Day.

He doesn't have any on-topic posts since that vote. He just votes in the night polls.

Basically I'd like to hear from Bass about why he voted the way he did.

I voted that way because more people I trusted voted that way and I wasn't keeping up as much as I should have been.

OK so you have people you trust?
So.. ergo.. you have people you don't trust... people you think are bad?
Who are they?

fingersplints wrote:I have not only spoke about defending myself. I commented on Floyd quitting, and bass. And damn right I am concerned about getting lynched atm. I'd be fucking crazy not to be.

Damned if you do, damned if you don't.

fingersplints wrote:Dr wilgy had two votes (one of which - golden - talked of voting me) so self preservation again makes sense. Why shouldn't I vote to save myself Dom?

Bass_the_Clever wrote:

Turnip Head wrote:My main beef with Bass is his posts during the Canuck vs juliets lynch. Here are his only two posts from that Day:


3:37pm

Bass_the_Clever wrote:Sorry haven't been around . I'm catching up now.

9:12pm

Bass_the_Clever wrote:I ag ree I think juliets and canuck are both wroth lynching but I think Canuck is where my vote is going tonight.

What pings me is that he didn't justify why he chose Canuck over juliets when the lynch was 8-5 in juliets' favor when he voted. If he had said why he voted that way I would feel better, but it looks like a save. If he thoughts juliets was worth lynching, why didn't he vote for the frontrunner? There's also a 6 hour gap between when he said he was catching up and when he voted with nothing in between, which makes it feel like he was intentionally trying to stay out of the discussion that Day.

He doesn't have any on-topic posts since that vote. He just votes in the night polls.

Basically I'd like to hear from Bass about why he voted the way he did.

I voted that way because more people I trusted voted that way and I wasn't keeping up as much as I should have been.

juliets wrote:Thank you LC and BR for another outstanding game. Your games just get better and better. And thanks to those of you who said goodbye in some way to me. I likely won't be in another game for awhile so have fun with the rest of this game and going forward.

Turnip Head wrote:Matt, did you know Epi and I shared that same square the night I "died"?

My interaction with MM is just how I play against him, he is my shinigami bro. Do you think it's odd that I was looking at him after I came back and woke up in a square with him?

The truth is I don't know if anyone else was also in the area when I died. Do you know if anyone else was in the area when I died?

Turnip Head wrote:I would like to lynch juliets by a landslide today.

DFaraday wrote:

Golden wrote: Why do people think Floyd is bad?

Affinity for Luke, vote for Nutella, Tranq's convenient death, coached-sounding comments...

Although I am starting to think there may be something to the Juliets case, if for no other reason than she's somehow gotten out of being lynched despite being the top discussion point for this long. Still, I feel more strongly about Floyd.

I think Floyd's affinity for Luke stems from outside of the game where they are RL friends. In my opinion the case on Luke wasn't that strong in the first place so I'm not condemning Floyd for not voting for his buddy there. I think it would be a coincidence if they were teammates. I wouldn't call Tranq's death convenient for Floyd if it ended up making him a suspect... Tranq was really the only one on Floyd's case, and no one was listening to Tranq. You don't think it could be a setup?

Golden wrote:What do people think of Wilgy?

I think he looks bad for how cavalierly he moved his vote off of juliets in a close lynch. I think Bass looks just as bad for similar reasons, because he said Canuck and juliets were both worth lynching but chose Canuck over juliets with no added justification for doing so.

S~V~S wrote:

Dom wrote:Mac, I was unaware that it couldn't be considered suspicious to consistently rotate your suspicion list like a rotisserie chicken.

All right, I am not 100% sure I agree with you here re Mac anymore, since he was the first person I started rereading, but this post made me actually laugh out loud for realsies (at work, not a good thing)

Just thought you might want to know

MacDougall wrote:Team Floyd:

Dom
Timmer

Team Juliets:

Tranq +
1 of Draconus or DFaraday

I'll take a look in detail when I have a moment. Just leaving work.

MacDougall wrote:

Dom wrote:Dfaraday-- why Floyd?


I'm more interested in Mac.

But i'd also like to lynch Juliets.

Dom wrote:

Sorsha wrote:

Dom wrote:So are we gonna lynch Juliets today or nah?

That was my plan. I am fine with a Floyd lynch too though.

I'd rather lynch Mac before Floyd.

Only two references to Floyd that Dom has. Just steering the suspicion away from him.

MacDougall wrote:

Dom wrote:

MacDougall wrote:

Dom wrote:Mac-- list everyone you think is "scum"

You must be up to 10 or 11+ people by now.

What is there to gain by this barbed comment?

I believe juliets and wilgy are scum.

I have no other reads.

I rescind my suspicion of sorsha.

Why do you cause conflict every time you post?

Dom, you clearly don't like me personally and that's fine I probably deserve your vitriol for calling you names earlier which I already apologised for but don't necessarily deserve an acceptance.

I do not cause conflict with every post, or at the very least I do not intend to. I don't think it's fair to say that I do that either.

I've already explained why I have been playing the way I have played up until now, and it was very recently. Perhaps you should read my recent few posts on the subject again.

MacDougall wrote:

Dom wrote:Mac-- list everyone you think is "scum"

You must be up to 10 or 11+ people by now.

What is there to gain by this barbed comment?

I believe juliets and wilgy are scum.

I have no other reads.

I rescind my suspicion of sorsha.

Sorsha wrote:

Dom wrote:So are we gonna lynch Juliets today or nah?

That was my plan. I am fine with a Floyd lynch too though.

LoRab wrote:

MacDougall wrote:You read some of the posts in that Talking Heads game right? Your post wasn't that long LoRab.

I thought we were friends early in the game. What happened? You changed. You used to be friendly to unusual creatures such as me but you turned on me LoRab. You turned on me bad and now we're not friends anymore and it pains me. It pains me LoRab.

We can still be friends. I mean, I think you're evil in this game, but that doesn't change friendship. I welcome you and I'm happy to have you playing--but I still think you're bad.

Hey--I've made some great friendships through accusations. I mean, some of my best friends are FEBS.

And that post was long by my current standards. I used to do really long posts (I once discovered that LP had a length limit, actually), but I gave that up long ago. I say what I need to say.

At any rate, yeah, I suspect you. I haven't changed. I just think you're bad.

10,000 character limit, I think.

juliets wrote:

MacDougall wrote:juliets do you resent being made scum by the host?

I think that's a question you should ask yourself.

Epignosis wrote:Dom, this case on juliets...is it perfect?

Or no?

juliets wrote:

Dom wrote:

juliets wrote:

Dom wrote:Didn't sound very worried here:

juliets wrote:I'm voting Canuck for obvious reasons.

I was of course worried. It looked like I was getting lynched. I don't know what you expected me to say to "sound worried".

I am going to vote "it depends" because I have played in both open and closed formats and it is different depending on format.

I'm not sure how simply saying "I'm voting someone for obvious reasons" is urgent.

Urgent? What do you mean? Urgent in that I needed to get it in before the lynch ended? I think you may mean something else, not urgent. Can you ask in a different way?

juliets wrote:

Dom wrote:Didn't sound very worried here:

juliets wrote:I'm voting Canuck for obvious reasons.

I was of course worried. It looked like I was getting lynched. I don't know what you expected me to say to "sound worried".

I am going to vote "it depends" because I have played in both open and closed formats and it is different depending on format.

juliets wrote:I'm voting Canuck for obvious reasons.

S~V~S wrote:Wow.

TheFloyd73 wrote:Voting for Juliet's because I frankly can't be bothered reading through.

LoRab wrote:

MacDougall wrote:Just replying to sorsha and LoRab who seem to think I am some kind of bad guy. I am heaps civ.

Well, gee. That totes convinces me.

And pro-civ is not civ. Are you claiming indy now, too?