The Syndicate

Well played, sprityo and Jay!

I had a feeling there was something off about Jay, but couldn't figure it out in time.

Died Night 1 again!

Oh well, I need to do things anyway. Have fun, folks. Thanks for hosting, Quin.

I'll ISO her quickly.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:Jay, what do you like about juliets?
I think she looked authentic in that lynch.

Can you point me to something specific?

Jay, what do you like about juliets?

Epignosis wrote:sprityo and llama are putting you on.

As in, they're teammates?

I'm really starting to wonder that myself.

Oh wow, LOL. Well. That explains some of this. GTH I'm not sure whether sprityo's teammate bussed or not though.

Llama loves to bus his teammates, so that does give me a bit of pause.

Thanks, Glorf!

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:MP what do you like about Rico

Mindmelding, partially. I'd also say he is throwing around thoughts with no regard as to how (un)popular they'll be. Seems authentic.

Don't feel very strongly about it, but it's a read.

My internet is acting up, hold on. Sorry folks.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:I know why "quite" is used, lol. I just am trying to understand where you're coming from, Jay. I don't read it as inauthentic.
I don't think it's typical of anyone I know to become frustrated that quickly and without trying to discuss it.

I don't know. I've gotten quickly frustrated by suspicions I perceive as built around "bullshit" or very weak reasons. I would say this qualifies as believable.

Ricochet
S~V~S
thellama73

Epignosis
Glorfindel
JaggedJimmyJay
juliets
Made
sprityo

both groups in alphabetical order, first group wouldn't lynch, second group could lynch

Epi, fair enough. Do you have any thoughts on people other than Llama?

Glorfindel, what are your reads?

I know why "quite" is used, lol. I just am trying to understand where you're coming from, Jay. I don't read it as inauthentic.

Ricochet wrote:that sprityo wagon becoming very icky. juliets particularly wagony

Yeah, I feel the same way.

sprityo, what are your current reads?

unvote: JaggedJimmyJay

vote: Epignosis

Say more things, Epi. Give me at least one read.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:
sprityo wrote:GUH you guys are really boiling my buns and now im getting flustered.

*grumble grumble*

Lynch me day one again, see if i care about your loss
okay

sprityo

You look quite inauthentic in this appeal. You barely even tried to argue for yourself and jumped straight to that.

What looks inauthentic about it?

And why did you say "quite inauthentic"? Doesn't inauthentic alone convey what you intend?

I'm not about to lynch someone based on a scumslip.

juliets wrote:What do you mean I'm sticking to the sidelines?

I think sprityo may have slipped after all - I thought he was talking about the Friday chatzy but evidently not so I'm voting for him

Vote sprityo

You haven't given any reads of me, S~V~S, Jay, Llama, Rico, etc., despite the fact that there has been discussion among us.

Ricochet wrote:"misguided" meta readings originate s~v~s = usually that baddie sign

Wait, what? Can you reword/elaborate upon this?

Llama, I don't know. I see what you're referring to, but I'm hesitant to call it a scumslip. I think it'd be pretty easily believable by the way this game was advertised/discussed that it would take place in the chatzy as opposed to in here.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:MovingPictures07

Playing for image and not for solving.
How do you figure? I'm invoking reactions. I already got one. Someone had to start somewhere.
Reaction baiting is an easy act to play. Hurl poop at people. Assess the reactions you've received immediately.

I think S~V~S is town, even if I strongly believe her meta assessment of me is misguided.

I'm not sure what to think of you yet. I'm still trying to figure that out.

I think llama is town, but I feel less confident about that than S~V~S.

Not sure about anyone else yet. juliets is sticking to the sidelines too much. So is Epi.

thellama73 wrote:SVS v. MP is civ on civ. Move along.

What inspired this conclusion specifically?

S~V~S wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:
juliets wrote:You're doing fine sprityo. The chatzy is the spectator thread. Once we die we can go in there.

Ok MP, let's do it.
Alright, I think Jay is bad.

JaggedJimmyJay
Overeager and forced. Probably scum.
Lol, you think me being overeager is a scum tell? Do elaborate.
After years of playing with you, in your case, yeah, I think it is.

You'd be wrong.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:MovingPictures07

Playing for image and not for solving.

How do you figure? I'm invoking reactions. I already got one. Someone had to start somewhere.

How did my reaction to your vote seemed forced, S~V~S? It's not.

Glorfindel wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:
Glorfindel wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:Now let's lynch some baddies.
Sounds to me like something a baddie might say...
How do you figure?
Could be a subtle attempt to give readers the impression that you are not one.

It's not subtle though.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:
juliets wrote:You're doing fine sprityo. The chatzy is the spectator thread. Once we die we can go in there.

Ok MP, let's do it.
Alright, I think Jay is bad.

JaggedJimmyJay
Overeager and forced. Probably scum.

Lol, you think me being overeager is a scum tell? Do elaborate.

S~V~S wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:
S~V~S wrote:Voting MADE, he isn't here.
This is an awfully easy vote.
Lynch ends inlike 3 minutes right?

He has not been onsite in a week and at least I voted.

Fair enough.

I won't be lynching S~V~S.

Epignosis wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:
Ricochet wrote:I prepared failproof questions to detect baddies

please respond truthfully

1. juliets, are you bad?
2. thellama73, are you bad?
3. MovingPictures07, are you bad?
4. Made, are you bad?
5. S~V~S, are you bad?
6. JaggedJimmyJay, are you bad?
7. Glorfindel, are you bad?
8. sprityo, are you bad?
10. Epignosis, are you bad?
Nope!
Why are you answering for other people?

Who said I was?

sprityo wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:
sprityo wrote:
juliets wrote:You're doing fine sprityo. The chatzy is the spectator thread. Once we die we can go in there.

Ok MP, let's do it.
yeah, i'd probably blow everyone out of the water with my 90 wpm typing speed
HE'S A FAST TYPIST, LYNCH HIM!

I thank you all for the warm reception. Although the caps lock was a bit unneccessary MP.

are you mad?

I am very mad. Mad at baddies.

S~V~S wrote:Voting MADE, he isn't here.

This is an awfully easy vote.

HE'S A COPYCAT, LYNCH HIM!

sprityo wrote:
juliets wrote:You're doing fine sprityo. The chatzy is the spectator thread. Once we die we can go in there.

Ok MP, let's do it.
yeah, i'd probably blow everyone out of the water with my 90 wpm typing speed

HE'S A FAST TYPIST, LYNCH HIM!

Glorfindel wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:Now let's lynch some baddies.
Sounds to me like something a baddie might say...

How do you figure?

juliets wrote:You're doing fine sprityo. The chatzy is the spectator thread. Once we die we can go in there.

Ok MP, let's do it.

Alright, I think Jay is bad.

JaggedJimmyJay

sprityo wrote:>but moving on

HELLO, ive returned after a small hiatus to claim a win

Maybe this time i wont get lynched Day 1 and Day 2

*cough cough*

HE'S COUGHING, LYNCH HIM!

Ricochet wrote:I prepared failproof questions to detect baddies

please respond truthfully

1. juliets, are you bad?
2. thellama73, are you bad?
3. MovingPictures07, are you bad?
4. Made, are you bad?
5. S~V~S, are you bad?
6. JaggedJimmyJay, are you bad?
7. Glorfindel, are you bad?
8. sprityo, are you bad?
10. Epignosis, are you bad?

Nope!

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I'll worry about the Chinese food when the other game is through it's EOD.

You're bad, aren't you, Jay?

Quin wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:
Quin wrote:Voting will have to be done in the thread, because I don't see a way to have shorter deadlines. Votes are changeable, day 0 will end at 7:45am AEST (10 minutes)
It is limited to days (for now), yes.

You could still have a poll, just no end time in it, and then end it once the time has expired. Up to you.
I think I'll just go with in thread votes. Make sure that you all signal your votes by posting in dead red or else I might not see it and it might not be counted. Thanks.

juliets wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:juliets, are you bad?
No, I'm not. Are you though?

Nope! Thankfully.

Let's lynch some baddies.

juliets, are you bad?

Quin wrote:Voting will have to be done in the thread, because I don't see a way to have shorter deadlines. Votes are changeable, day 0 will end at 7:45am AEST (10 minutes)

It is limited to days (for now), yes.

You could still have a poll, just no end time in it, and then end it once the time has expired. Up to you.

Sweet and sour chicken.

Now let's lynch some baddies.

Search found 46 matches