Search found 384 matches

by indiglo
Fri Mar 25, 2016 10:50 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [END] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Replies: 9293
Views: 184613

Re: [NIGHT 7] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Prisoner 509378 wrote:Remaining names who haven't really shown me that beautiful town spark at any point:

Boomslang
Nerolunar
chaindeath
Elohcin
Soneji
Dom

Some of them (or their predecessors) have had fleeting moments of decency, but none of them have jumped out at me and made me feel anything. Even Quin and sig have at least given me that.

I guess I'll rainbow:

Sloonei
S~V~S
indiglo
Turnip Head


Epignosis
Scotty
Black Rock


thellama73
Quin
sig


soneji
Nerolunar


Dom
Elohcin
chaindeath
Boomslang


Even with all of our setbacks, as long as the town core has not been infiltrated then town will win this game. That means we should be getting these people lynched, and while we wait for results critically assessing those we trust to ensure we haven't left a gaping hole in our collective strategy. The yellow names are the wildcards for me. Quin and sig are very easy to suspect for evidence-based reasons, but I don't think either of their post histories looks like a baddie. I've been wrong before, but every time I try to suspect them I find myself unwilling to commit -- it's a square block in a round peg for me. llama hasn't set off any alarms, but his general approach to this game is very easy to play as any alignment and he shouldn't be given a pass just because he's llama.
Thanks for the pep talk, P50. I guess right now the wind has kind of been taken out of my sails for the moment. And I'm feeling lost & disoriented, and more than a little frustrated at the low participation from apparent townies (which I understand because I more than get that RL trumps mafia, but I'm still allowed to be frustrated by it).

I'm going to try to not think about the game for just a little while longer (clearly not working, because HEEEEEEEERRRREEE'SSSSS INDI! /Jack Nicholson) and then try to come back with a fresher mind and renewed, positive spirit. The pep talk helped. And I know I'll recharge the batteries and be back all chipper and witty and clever. But your even keeled, factual pep talk was really, really helpful to me, and I appreciate it.

Also, note to Dons and Hitman - Boomslang. Boomslang. Boomslang. ;) :beer:


Linki w/Swedish Chef - :D Pretzel Machine... I like soft pretzels. I was just sitting here quietly reading, and then said out loud "pretzel machine" and started laughing. Dex said "I take it that's the punchline?" :haha:

Ugh, more linki~ let me post!!!
by indiglo
Fri Mar 25, 2016 3:44 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [END] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Replies: 9293
Views: 184613

Re: [NIGHT 7] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Turnip Head wrote:
indiglo wrote:
Prisoner 509378 wrote:I might even call Sloonei's shift opportunistic, but if he's a bad guy then I will eat my shoe and my foot inside it directly off of my leg.
I wish he were scum, because I'm not sure if I believe you. :ponder:
Odd way to phrase this :ponder: Do you know he's not a cop?
indiglo wrote:What are everyone's thoughts on Scotty?
Scotty's mah boi :keys:
No, I just find it highly unlikely and was teasing Prisoner50. :biggrin:
by indiglo
Fri Mar 25, 2016 3:10 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [END] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Replies: 9293
Views: 184613

Re: [NIGHT 7] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Prisoner 509378 wrote:I might even call Sloonei's shift opportunistic, but if he's a bad guy then I will eat my shoe and my foot inside it directly off of my leg.
I wish he were scum, because I'm not sure if I believe you. :ponder:
by indiglo
Fri Mar 25, 2016 3:09 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [END] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Replies: 9293
Views: 184613

Re: [NIGHT 7] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

What are everyone's thoughts on Scotty?
by indiglo
Fri Mar 25, 2016 3:06 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [END] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Replies: 9293
Views: 184613

Re: [NIGHT 7] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Prisoner 509378 wrote:
Turnip Head wrote:
Scotty wrote:
Turnip Head wrote:
S~V~S wrote:Just becasue she misjudged YOU (which just about everyone did) does not make her bad.
I know that, like I said it's the timing of everything that concerns me. I admit I have a biased point of view on this.
Is bleck ruck yuoor strungest cese-a? Bork Bork Bork!
I don't know. I haven't even read back to see how I got lynched yet.
We spent essentially the whole day phase deciding as a group whether to lynch you or Boomslang. Towards the end, the momentum moved in your direction. I think the case against you was a truly strong one so I can't immediately fault anyone for voting for you. When I look at the tally and try to find opportunists, I think the most likely candidates on your wagon are Elohcin (Serge) and chaindeath. A decent argument could be made against Quin and Dom too.
Exactly. I look forward to you reading back and seeing what you think TH, but I do think that looking at BR will be a waste of time. Most of the votes were well reasoned and sound, imo - and again, I felt more sure about this vote than Fuzz's. The ones I am most curious about are those who were basically absent, or hadn't been talking about TH... but just came on this wagon and voted him anyway. At the same time, some scum likely voted elsewhere (obviously), so I do want to look over the vote tally again.

With that said, I feel like I am doing a shit job sniffing out scum this game, so I am not sure I even trust myself to look over things or do re-reads. :pout:
by indiglo
Thu Mar 24, 2016 8:14 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [END] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Replies: 9293
Views: 184613

Re: [NIGHT 7] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

S~V~S wrote:I feel pretty OK about it.

After all the only people who know for a fact that someone is not bad is the baddies.
And at least he didn't die. So it doesn't entirely count as a mis-lynch in the stats.
by indiglo
Thu Mar 24, 2016 8:13 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [END] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Replies: 9293
Views: 184613

Re: [NIGHT 7] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Prisoner 509378 wrote:Hey let's kill Boomslang this night phase, eh? No flip sucks, but it'd still be great to not have to spend the lynch on him.
So far, those killed by the Hitmen have flipped. So, if Hitman/Don does Boom tonight, I would think he would flip as well. Which would be boss.
by indiglo
Thu Mar 24, 2016 7:58 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [END] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Replies: 9293
Views: 184613

Re: [NIGHT 7] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Prisoner 509378 wrote:Quin, chaindeath, and Elohcin votes are all meh.
Indeed. In a way, this may have been one of the most helpful lynches we've had.
by indiglo
Thu Mar 24, 2016 7:56 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [END] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Replies: 9293
Views: 184613

Re: [NIGHT 7] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

@Scotty - Deffo down with Boom tomorrow at face value. Before deciding for sure, I think some ISOing is in order. I like the 48 hour night. That will be good. We need to get some good work done again this night period. This has really surprised me, I think it's time to reevaluate even harder.
by indiglo
Thu Mar 24, 2016 7:49 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [END] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Replies: 9293
Views: 184613

Re: [NIGHT 7] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Well, well, well. That was surprising, to say the least. Assuming my assumption about what that means is correct.
by indiglo
Thu Mar 24, 2016 7:34 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [END] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Replies: 9293
Views: 184613

Re: [DAY 7] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Epignosis wrote:
indiglo wrote:How long has Golden been out of the game? It's at least been a couple of days or so, and I just looked and he is STILL the number 2 poster in the thread. That's bullshit too. Or actually, Goldenshit.

You know... number 2 poster... :grin:
I wanted to boo that, but I'm too exhausted not to laugh.
Image
by indiglo
Thu Mar 24, 2016 7:28 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [END] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Replies: 9293
Views: 184613

Re: [DAY 7] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

How long has Golden been out of the game? It's at least been a couple of days or so, and I just looked and he is STILL the number 2 poster in the thread. That's bullshit too. Or actually, Goldenshit.

You know... number 2 poster... :grin:
by indiglo
Thu Mar 24, 2016 5:46 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [END] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Replies: 9293
Views: 184613

Re: [DAY 7] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

I don't expect any last minute shenanigans this go 'round. I think we have our ducks in a row pretty well. We have 2 people who need to vote still - Eloh & TH himself. But I still don't see a wrench being thrown in our plans at this point. Crossing my fingers and toes also!
by indiglo
Thu Mar 24, 2016 4:50 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [END] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Replies: 9293
Views: 184613

Re: [DAY 6] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

EBWOP: (in case that wasn't written clearly)
indiglo wrote:
Turnip Head wrote:I think my uncertainty stems from the fact that no one is playing a "typical baddie game" here. In a one-mafia setting I expect the mafia to have trouble blending into such a talkative game. Unless all the cops are lurkers, they're are some town-looking players who are actually bad, and hell if I know who it is at this point. I think we need another cop lynch to break the game open; the Fuzz lynch happened to quickly to draw meaningful conclusions from it, IMO.

It's possible they're all lurkers though. I feel pretty good about Boomslang being bad at this point, and Draconus is worrying me too.
I'm going to put this here, and then we can revisit it after our lynch today. I find the highlighted part ABOUT BOOMSLANG interesting, and could easily see it being distancing from a MIA teammate. But I guess revisiting it after the lynch may help.

The Draconus part (who I believe is Dom now) may or may not be interesting. I don't read Drac as scum (or Dom so far), and I doubt TH would cast aspersions on 2 teammates. I have sometimes done such a thing as scum - you diss a non-helpful teammate & and also include a civ who seems sketchy to some other civs in the diss.
by indiglo
Thu Mar 24, 2016 4:49 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [END] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Replies: 9293
Views: 184613

Re: [DAY 6] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Turnip Head wrote:I think my uncertainty stems from the fact that no one is playing a "typical baddie game" here. In a one-mafia setting I expect the mafia to have trouble blending into such a talkative game. Unless all the cops are lurkers, they're are some town-looking players who are actually bad, and hell if I know who it is at this point. I think we need another cop lynch to break the game open; the Fuzz lynch happened to quickly to draw meaningful conclusions from it, IMO.

It's possible they're all lurkers though. I feel pretty good about Boomslang being bad at this point, and Draconus is worrying me too.
I'm going to put this here, and then we can revisit it after our lynch today. I find the highlighted part interesting, and could easily see it being distancing from a MIA teammate. But I guess revisiting it after the lynch may help.

The Draconus part (who I believe is Dom now) may or may not be interesting. I don't read Drac as scum (or Dom so far), and I doubt TH would cast aspersions on 2 teammates. I have sometimes done such a thing as scum - you diss a non-helpful teammate & and also include a civ who seems sketchy to some other civs in the diss.
by indiglo
Thu Mar 24, 2016 4:37 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [END] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Replies: 9293
Views: 184613

Re: [DAY 7] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Scotty wrote:
Prisoner 509378 wrote:
Scotty wrote:
Prisoner 509378 wrote:Well barring some serious b/s, someone I want lynched today is going to be lynched today. Cool.
I'm bured. Vunt tu roon a CFD oon Sluuneee, Preesuner? Bork Bork Bork! :goofp:
Maybe we could CFD you instead, meatball. :feb:
Hey preesuner, yuoo drupped yuoor suep. Bork Bork Bork!V :dark:

Literally lol'd. :haha:
by indiglo
Thu Mar 24, 2016 4:33 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [END] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Replies: 9293
Views: 184613

Re: [DAY 7] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Sloonei wrote:
indiglo wrote:
Sloonei wrote:indi, do you have an appropriate smiley for Scotty's borking?

:ponder: I'll be looking.
godspeed

This one ain't half bad...

Image
by indiglo
Thu Mar 24, 2016 4:31 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [END] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Replies: 9293
Views: 184613

Re: [DAY 7] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Prisoner 509378 wrote:So if anyone from the cool town club is an evil traitor, what shall their punishment be?

I know a place.
I will throw my ball at them and then probably cry. :nicenod: That seems like pretty bad punishment, tbh.
by indiglo
Thu Mar 24, 2016 4:29 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [END] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Replies: 9293
Views: 184613

Re: [DAY 7] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Sloonei wrote:Yeah let's lynch Turnip Head today, come on everybody!

:fiesta: Lynching Turnip, cha-cha-cha, lynching Turnip, cha-cha-cha :fiesta:


Sorry TH, nothing personal. And you're not really be lynched IRL, so both those things are positives! :hugs:
by indiglo
Thu Mar 24, 2016 4:26 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [END] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Replies: 9293
Views: 184613

Re: [DAY 7] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Sloonei wrote:indi, do you have an appropriate smiley for Scotty's borking?

:ponder: I'll be looking.
by indiglo
Thu Mar 24, 2016 4:25 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [END] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Replies: 9293
Views: 184613

Re: [DAY 7] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Scotty wrote:
Scotty wrote:
indiglo wrote:
sig wrote: Could someone explain the DDL is seemer thing? In theory they could pick a secret role then make it up yes? However, his role seems like alot of thought was put into it.

It's just speculation, and I couldn't really find much to prove or disprove the theory. I think it started because of Scotty's strange, midday affliction of Swedish Chef posting. It makes no sense that it started when it did based on any role we are currently aware of in the game... so he posited the thought that perhaps it has to do with the new people who joined right before he was afflicted.

That perhaps Dom (I think, he replaced Drac, right?) was the actual Secret Role of "Sockface" (not DDL) and that the Swedish Chef posting had to do with the actual Secret Role, which would now be active again after Drac's long absence.
I dun't beleeefe-a thet Dum is zee Suckffece-a rule-a boot rezeer DDL chuse-a thet rule-a es hees seemer rule-a tu shoo. It cuoold hefe-a beee zee oone-a he-a deseegned heemselff. I vuooldn't be-a soorpreesed iff zee Suckffece-a rule-a vesn't in zee geme-a et ell- thet's vhy I'm seyeeng. Bork Bork Bork!

Ooh, ok, I got you. So you're saying, that if Dom is the secret role, then Sockface isn't the secret role? Yes, I agree. If DDL was the seemer, then the secret role is still secret. Did I get that right?
by indiglo
Thu Mar 24, 2016 4:24 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [END] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Replies: 9293
Views: 184613

Re: [DAY 7] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Scotty wrote:
indiglo wrote:
sig wrote: Could someone explain the DDL is seemer thing? In theory they could pick a secret role then make it up yes? However, his role seems like alot of thought was put into it.

It's just speculation, and I couldn't really find much to prove or disprove the theory. I think it started because of Scotty's strange, midday affliction of Swedish Chef posting. It makes no sense that it started when it did based on any role we are currently aware of in the game... so he posited the thought that perhaps it has to do with the new people who joined right before he was afflicted.

That perhaps Dom (I think, he replaced Drac, right?) was the actual Secret Role of "Sockface" (not DDL) and that the Swedish Chef posting had to do with the actual Secret Role, which would now be active again after Drac's long absence.
I dun't beleeefe-a thet Dum is zee secret rule-a boot rezeer DDL chuse-a thet rule-a es hees seemer rule-a tu shoo. It cuoold hefe-a beee zee oone-a he-a deseegned heemselff. I vuooldn't be-a soorpreesed iff zee Suckffece-a rule-a vesn't in zee geme-a et ell- thet's vhy I'm seyeeng. Bork Bork Bork!

Sorry Scotty, apparently there are 1 or 2 essential words I'm not understanding. :puppy: Perhaps once night starts your posting restriction will be over, and you can say whatever you like, however you like.
by indiglo
Thu Mar 24, 2016 1:43 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [END] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Replies: 9293
Views: 184613

Re: [DAY 7] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

sig wrote: Could someone explain the DDL is seemer thing? In theory they could pick a secret role then make it up yes? However, his role seems like alot of thought was put into it.

It's just speculation, and I couldn't really find much to prove or disprove the theory. I think it started because of Scotty's strange, midday affliction of Swedish Chef posting. It makes no sense that it started when it did based on any role we are currently aware of in the game... so he posited the thought that perhaps it has to do with the new people who joined right before he was afflicted.

That perhaps Dom (I think, he replaced Drac, right?) was the actual Secret Role of "Sockface" (not DDL) and that the Swedish Chef posting had to do with the actual Secret Role, which would now be active again after Drac's long absence.
by indiglo
Thu Mar 24, 2016 1:14 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [END] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Replies: 9293
Views: 184613

Re: [DAY 7] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

That was supposed to say "I'd have NO problem switching my vote to Boom" not "I'd have to problem switching my vote". Mercy me, I am just having 0 luck with the typing of my posts lately. WTF? :fist: :puppy:
by indiglo
Thu Mar 24, 2016 1:11 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [END] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Replies: 9293
Views: 184613

Re: [DAY 7] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Dom wrote:Also, indiglo! I've missed playing with you-- glad to se you!

Ditto! It's been fun getting the cobwebs out of my head and dusting off ye olde paranoia. :D This has genuinely been an enjoyable game! Glad to have you join us.


Prisoner 509378 wrote:
Sloonei wrote:As we get closer to the deadline I think ot becomes imperative that we all consolidate our votes on one player. There's too much behind the scenes vote shenanigans going on to comfortably have split votes if it's not necessary.
My finger is on the trigger.
Yes, mine too. My opinion on Boorique has been abundantly clear, so I'd have to problem moving my vote there, if need be. (Even if he isn't my first choice.)




@Llama, I am trying to see where you are coming from about TH. I think we're just interpreting that post differently though. Suppose all 3 of those original Wagoneers were civs. TH was really just echoing what others had said, there had been much discussion about how a lot of us didn't feel comfortable voting for any of those 3 original candidates. So TH mentions changing, and doing a CFD on someone else. Great way to piggy back on general town thoughts. And with so many more civs in the game than scum, I don't think he thought for a minute that the CFD would land on scum. Also, once he said that, the CFD started picking up steam REALLY fast - and if he really wanted to CFD someone, he would have been all aboard the train. The fact is, he wasn't all aboard the train. He avoided participating in ALL the Fuzz CFD discussion, even though he was present during all of it.

My thinking is that had his CFD Wish been genuine, he would have said "Oh hooray! We're lynching someone else, I'm on board, toot toot!" Or something to that effect. Fact is, he conspicuously avoided all the CFD discussion, accept to post some vague concerns that it was actually happening. (I mean DUH it's happening, and 10 minutes ago, he WANTED it to happen.) I think at that point he would have looked even worse NOT voting in the CFD, because of how he had brought up the whole matter in the first place, and then dragged his feet on it the ENTIRE time. It read to me as - he brought up an idea not sure whether or not it would get traction, and if it did what would the odds be it would end up on scum... and then when it got traction on scum, he started freaking out big time. Otherwise, why wouldn't he be happy that HIS idea got traction in the thread? I think that's what it boils down to for me. His idea got traction, and then he didn't like the idea anymore. That reads to me that it was because of who the idea got traction on - Scum Fuzz.



That is just my interpretation of how that went down. And I understand yours is different. I am only mentioning my interpretation again out of a desire not to tunnel, or misconstrue. If there is a fallacy in my thinking, I am hoping someone can point it out.

Then, even beyond the CFD, I find there is plenty more suspicious stuff from TH as well.
by indiglo
Thu Mar 24, 2016 12:29 am
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [END] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Replies: 9293
Views: 184613

Re: [DAY 7] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

EBWOP - DDL's analysis of the CFD, not TH's. DDL kept giving TH all the credit for the CFD, which was less than accurate, IMO.
indiglo wrote: Here he is analyzing the CFD again after the fact, and his analysis seems much more spot-on than DDL's - I kept reading DDL's analysis as very agenda having, this one from Serge seems to be truthful and accurate
I am full of edits.
by indiglo
Thu Mar 24, 2016 12:23 am
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [END] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Replies: 9293
Views: 184613

Re: [DAY 7] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Thoughts on Serge...

Much of what I read of his posts genuinely seem like he is trying to figure out the game. (Remember, I do not know this person at all, so I am ISOing him as someone who has 0 idea of his meta) All posts of his will be mentioned in Chronological Order, starting back on March 10 in the AM.

Trying to figure out CFD dyanmics

Some of these posts will mean more to me once we have begun lynching our candidates - like this post where Enrique says Serge is a cop

He's replying to Golden here, and still trying to decode the CFD development after the fact

A reminder not to get so attached to 1 idea that it festers and keeps you from looking at other possibilities - seems civvish to me to remind everyone of that

Here he's agreeing with TH's case on LC - which in hindsight is a little :eye:

Here he is analyzing the CFD again after the fact, and his analysis seems much more spot-on than TH's - I kept reading TH's analysis as very agenda having, this one from Serge seems to be truthful and accurate

Here is finally the highlight, at least to me - Serge goes through and lists the instigators of the CFD on Fuzz, and he lists them (from scummiest to least scummiest): TH, Golden, SVS - so if we do end up lynching TH, that may help my Serge read



Over all conclusion on Serge - doesn't seem super scummy to me. Seems like he was trying to keep up as best he could, he posted consistent content, even without making a huge quantity of posts. Finding out Boomrique's and TH's alignment will perhaps shed additional light on Serge. Boomrique called Serge a cop, and Serge called TH scummy.

Leaning town on Serge & NewSerge (who I've already forgotten which of the new arrivals replaced him, oops! :grin: )




I will welcome any and all feedback on my ISO's of both these peeps. I didn't quote posts for Mongoose/Draconus/NewMongDrac because there weren't that many, and I just felt fine accepting them as civ. I believe when we did our GTH exercise the other day (when I was at a hotel with internet that worked JUST FINE until we were GTH-ing :fist: ) I had Draconus down as scum. That was because I had no read on him, so I defaulted to scum. I would now update that GTH read to town.

Serge did have some reasonings that didn't make sense to me, but then he said some other stuff (like suspicions, etc) that also caught my eye. So I grabbed his posts as I went.
by indiglo
Wed Mar 23, 2016 11:46 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [END] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Replies: 9293
Views: 184613

Re: [DAY 7] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Quin wrote:I think that if the seemed posed as the secret role, they'd have to make up the rolecard themselves. I've always thought that.

Are you hosting this game? :p

Interesting answer from MP. :ponder: I am nearly out of brain juice, so I am not sure how to resolve it at this time.


Ok, read Mongoose/Draconus... I'm not getting Scum vibes there. Moving on to Serge before the brain craps out completely. Woo hoo! :workit:
by indiglo
Wed Mar 23, 2016 11:30 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [END] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Replies: 9293
Views: 184613

Re: [DAY 7] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Alright sir, let's ask. :dark: (want to take bets on whether or not we'll get an answer? :shifty: )


@ Hosts - If the Seemer posed as the Secret Role, would the true role card get flipped? Or would the Seemer have to write up a fake role card?



Is this a wild goose chase? Why haven't I finished ISOing Chain yet? His tab is still open. Can we lynch TH now? Does anyone have any chocolate?

And yes, I find TH's absence during the CFD odd. Because, he wasn't absent, he was right here... he just didn't engage at all. I don't see how a civ could be here, in the thread, while that was happening and not engage at all. It was too exciting and crazy.


Hey, look at this post I typed forever ago, just sitting here still, hanging out in its little tab. I finished my ISO on chaindeath. I still don't read him as scum. I haven't seen him mentioned in a bit, is he still on anyone's hit list?

I look over the predecessors to our new recruits now.
by indiglo
Wed Mar 23, 2016 11:10 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [END] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Replies: 9293
Views: 184613

Re: [DAY 7] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Also, apologies Scotty. Dex just informed me I've been reading your posts in the incorrect accent. (I was going with Russian.) And now I will begin reading them in a Swedish accent. ;)


Image



Also, of course, my previous post agreeing about TH possibly being the Warden is all assuming he is, indeed, a Cop. Bork bork bork! :D
by indiglo
Wed Mar 23, 2016 11:05 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [END] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Replies: 9293
Views: 184613

Re: [DAY 7] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Scotty wrote:leeke-a TH vuoold meke-a a guud cese-a fur beeeng zee verdeen. It vuoold ixpleeen hees ebsence-a dooreeng zee preesun breek. Bork Bork Bork!
Ok, I am so glad you said this - I had thought of this earlier myself! Of all the scum, TH has been active all along - which I think would be necessary for Wardening. I can't imagine one of the skaters-by being the Warden. (Like Boom, for example.)
by indiglo
Wed Mar 23, 2016 10:38 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [END] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Replies: 9293
Views: 184613

Re: [DAY 7] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

See, what gets me about DDL's lynch is that a ton of Prisoners voted there too - so it wasn't just our in-thread ongoing rampant paranoia. Other eyes, fresh eyes, came in and saw what we saw. I don't know, I guess I should let that go, but there was definitely room in my brain for it - I can see that.


Now I was going to ISO chaindeath. I nearly forgot. I can do that, but I'll say right now I don't see the case on him. I'll try to go into with as open a mind as I can.

I'm thinking I should probably ISO the predecessors of our new arrivals too. That should take all of about 5 minutes.
by indiglo
Wed Mar 23, 2016 10:31 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [END] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Replies: 9293
Views: 184613

Re: [DAY 7] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Additional conclusion - I put my linki in the wrong place in my post. :puppy:
by indiglo
Wed Mar 23, 2016 10:30 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [END] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Replies: 9293
Views: 184613

Re: [DAY 7] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Ok, considering whether or not DDL was the Seemer. So, this is a small sample size, it's just the day 2 lynch.

Role Power: [A dog who is so excited he is just peeing all over everything]: If Sockface thinks he has found a baddie, he will get really excited. Once in the game, he can activate this ability to gain triple vote power for a day.


This was the only lynch that Luffy was a part of where that role power could have come into play and won the lynch. I don't think he used it this day though, because reading back, he was NOT 100% on board the wagon for Fuzz. He said, in fact, my suspicion on you is not strong but he voted there to avoid a throw away vote.


RadicalFuzz
8
Golden (17), ika (18), Silverwolf (19), indiglo (20), S~V~S (21), Dragon D. Luffy (22), Turnip Head (24), Sloonei (25) 28%


ika
9
Quin (5), Nerolunar (6), agleaminranks (11), Soneji (12), Serge (14), RadicalFuzz (16), Enrique (23), Long Con (28), sig (29) 31%


Conclusion - from this evidence alone, I find it impossible to tell if DDL was really Sockface. Were he Sockface, he did not use his special Pee Power votes to kill Fuzz.



Further investigation: Here, he builds a mega case on Golden and explains the EoD2 CFD on Fuzz. At the time (and currently) I found his explanation a bit misleading. He credits TH with the CFD - which is utterly false to anyone in thread at that time, or anyone looking back on it with an honest eye. TH was not involved at ALL in our CFD of Fuzz, which Golden tried to explain to DDL, to no avail. This may have been an attempt to start a discredit of Golden.

He rails on Golden quite a bit more, then gloms onto Sloon's mention of Gleam

Next he backs off Golden almost completely and finds it odd that anyone agreed with him about Golden being bad & wanting to lynch him

And so forth. I remember this though, there was pretty much only 1 post all game that made me pause and consider he could be civ. Just one.

Conclusion - it is possible he was the Seemer, but I can't see anyway to be sure of that until end game. I would not find it a totally unbelievable or ridiculous thing to consider.




Linki~ ACK! Stop that! They're is no place in this game for poor grammar. :smile:
Further conclusion - I just wasted a bunch of time doing this, but I got my brain gears moving, so that part is kind of nice.
by indiglo
Wed Mar 23, 2016 10:09 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [END] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Replies: 9293
Views: 184613

Re: [DAY 7] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

EBWOP: *they're* ... oh man, that is going to bother me. That's one of my pet peeves. :doh:
by indiglo
Wed Mar 23, 2016 10:08 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [END] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Replies: 9293
Views: 184613

Re: [DAY 7] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Welcome Eloh and Dom! Thank you much for being willing to sub into a game of this size, and this late in the game. That takes some mighty big brass ones.


Prisoner 509378 wrote:The case against Turnip Head is probably the strongest in the game right now, IMO. Boomslang's case is less convincing simply because there has been no content from that game slot for numerous game cycles. He's become a player though, who if he is town, will seriously upset me. There's no excuse to play this way as a townie, and I highly doubt he is doing that. He's gliding by for his team mates' sake.

I feel comfortable saying they're both bad.

And this is exactly where I'm at also. And that's why I think TH should go first. Boom is gliding by, not paying attention, who knows if he's even sending in his Night Actions. But TH has been more involved (although merely peripherally, looking at his actual content) and I think he's the higher priority here. However, as I've said before, I am definitely willing to go with Boom if that where consensus takes us.

Also, has anyone thought of any downsides to aiding our Flower Famiglia out with their NKs? Is there anyway we would be putting either of them (assuming their still alive) in any danger?


Scotty's thing is odd. I can't imagine it would be a loan repayment, as someone else said it started at midday. But I also have no idea what else it could possibly be. I see nothing mentioning weird accents or weird ways of speaking in the roles. But apparently he doesn't know why it happened either - which would also lend credence to it NOT being a loan repayment... and some other strange game mechanic or host punishment. (Though if the hosts are handing out punishment, I imagine all the MIA players would be first on their lists! :ohyeah: )


DDL as the seemer?... that's interesting too. Let me look at a couple of things, and see if that fits inside my brain.
by indiglo
Wed Mar 23, 2016 4:57 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [END] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Replies: 9293
Views: 184613

Re: [DAY 7] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Ok, quick review of roles & deadies list.


There is only 1 cop who can block:
Beat Cop - Patrols one player of his choice every night, effectively role blocking them.


And the SockFace Hitman is dead now. (Matt 2.0)


So, there is, in theory, the Daisy Syndicate's kill available (assuming both Don & Hitman are still alive and free). With that in mind, I'm game to attempt to make a consensus list of 2 players. We lynch 1, and leave the other up for the Famiglia to off.

First, I do want to hear a consensus from everyone - just in case anyone sees a problem with this idea that I have overlooked.
by indiglo
Wed Mar 23, 2016 4:49 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [END] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Replies: 9293
Views: 184613

Re: [DAY 7] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Prisoner 509378 wrote:
Sloonei wrote:Two townies have to agree on a target without even knowing each other's identities.
This inspires a thought: shouldn't we be doing those roles a solid in the thread? We don't need to expose them in any way, but we could help to guide their sights onto a common name. We have a coalition of sorts built now. We lynch a #1 guy and name a #2 guy to be offed. Anyone opposed? There is obviously some risk here with the ratios critical, but that might also be why a gamble is warranted.

I am game to try this. First, let me double check the roles to see if there is a protector/blocker anywhere. I certainly wouldn't want to out anyone or cause a problem there.

Also, I do believe 1 of the hitmen is now gone, iirc. So at most, there is likely just 1 family who hopefully still has Don & hitman still intact. But I'll double check on that too. Still, 1 coordinated civ kill is better than none! :nicenod:


*sings* ~linki with myself... linki with myself...
by indiglo
Wed Mar 23, 2016 4:45 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [END] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Replies: 9293
Views: 184613

Re: [DAY 7] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Sloonei wrote:If anyone is able to do such a thing, could we all post a ranked list of suspects in order of lynch priority today?

For me it's:
1. Boomslang
2. Turnip Head
3. chaindeath

...
4. sig
5. Quin

Today's ranked list of priorities for me:

1. TH
2. Boom
3. Quin or sig

If TH doesn't pick up a ton of traction today, I would be willing to move to Boom. I have not yet had a chance to look into the Chaindeath business (I will have time for that on Thursday though, Wednesdays are always busy for me) so I would only be willing to move there if I see something there. (Or, I suppose if every other player moves there, and there would be literally no point in me voting elsewhere - if that makes sense. I'm going to try my best to be stubborn or tunnely here.)
by indiglo
Wed Mar 23, 2016 12:18 am
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [END] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Replies: 9293
Views: 184613

Re: [DAY 7] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

sig wrote:
Sloonei wrote:Those 7 points were actually 3 points. I took Silverwolf's "100% sure" remarks to be in response to the thread imploring her to make that claim for the sake of sig's reaction. I don't think her read on ika is infallible, and I am able to believe a scenario where ika was what his role flip says he was.

What makes you say the stool pigeon is a role the seemer would choose?
One of the few without BTSC.
There are WAY more civs without BTSC than with. So I really don't understand this comment. I'll just add it to the tally of things sig has said that I find strange, confusing or that just plain don't make sense to me. :beer:
by indiglo
Wed Mar 23, 2016 12:15 am
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [END] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Replies: 9293
Views: 184613

Re: [DAY 7] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Scotty wrote:
Epignosis wrote:Seems like we're divided today.
What changed from yesterday? Boom was on the chopping block, he seemed like the one that garnered the votes from the civ core. The only info we got was that silver may or may not have info.

I mean if the group ends up favoring another by tomorrow (end of phase) I'll vote there, but I'm just awfully curious why we don't just effing lynch something together for once.

Question for anyone: who can NOT get behind a Boom vote with conviction?

I can get behind Boom, yes. I'd prefer TH atm, but if consensus says Boom, I'm fine going there. I thought we did very well yesterday - I just think some stinkers (cops) got in there and jacked with us.

I don't feel I could vote Chain with conviction though, at least not at this point.
by indiglo
Tue Mar 22, 2016 10:54 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [END] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Replies: 9293
Views: 184613

Re: [DAY 7] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Epignosis wrote:Seems like we're divided today.
It's shocking, isn't it? :faint:




And look at that, I'm caught up! Hooray! :D
by indiglo
Tue Mar 22, 2016 10:50 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [END] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Replies: 9293
Views: 184613

Re: [DAY 7] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Replying as I catch up...
Epignosis wrote:All right, I've made up a game.

If you are on right now.

You have a lynch switch. You have to use it now.

Go. :dark:
I wait until the last 30 minutes of the Day Phase. Then I use it. :p
by indiglo
Tue Mar 22, 2016 10:47 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [END] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Replies: 9293
Views: 184613

Re: [NIGHT 6] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Prisoner 509378 wrote:Okay now that I've sufficiently poked Epi, I'm going to pose a question to everyone:
Silverwolf wrote:Sigh................

I have one little thing that concerns me about this...................
Silverwolf wrote:Nah, probs just being paranoid.

I'm sorry ika..................... :hugs:
Epignosis wrote:
Silverwolf wrote:Sigh................

I have one little thing that concerns me about this...................
Just one?
Yes
The highlighted bit seems to immediately eliminate the possibility that Silverwolf could have information that implies/confirms ika is the seemer. If there's even an implication then that admission of probable paranoia would have never happened, right?

So when we return to this later thing:
Silverwolf wrote:
Prisoner 509378 wrote:I actually considered for a moment that SW might have the role ika flipped as, but her initial reaction to the lynch would seem to reject that theory.
I have "reasons" for thinking ika is the seemer.
How seriously should we take those freaking quotation marks? It's designed to look like a role hint or an infodump, but I don't know what it could be based on the roles at hand. If Silverwolf was the actual role that ika flipped, then she would have never doubted herself for a moment.

My take? We should not take those freaking quotation marks very seriously. But that's just my take on SW. When she gets going, it seems like she'll flip flop to extremes, get real upset and state some wacky ideas as fact.

That being said, I do not know this woman from Adam's cat. This is my first mafia experience with her. She is extremely intense and gets riled up on a regular basis. I have had a hard time making sense (or believing) very much of anything she's said. Not saying that to be rude or mean, it's just when you're going back and forth and flinging mud everywhere with great conviction... I tend to just write the whole thing off.
by indiglo
Tue Mar 22, 2016 8:48 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [END] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Replies: 9293
Views: 184613

Re: [NIGHT 6] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Prisoner 509378 wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
Prisoner 509378 wrote:I don't think anyone on this roster of players had any reason to kill Silverwolf except Epignosis. I also don't think it was an attempt to frame him, because there can be no more difficult a framejob than one on the hornet's nest. Many of the doubts about what happened on Day 2 are resolved theoretically by a Fuzz-ika-Epignosis cop team dynamic, and his involvement also plays into the way he handled Silverwolf's suspicion of ika pre-lynch and suspicion that he was the seemer post-lynch.
I (obviously) don't agree with you. I would venture a guess that she got arrested because she's not on anyone's list of eight. :meany:
Numerous people weren't on any lists of eight, and none of them were lightning rods that could [unitnentionally] derail the thread quite like Silverwolf. She was also being called a tinfoil suspect by at least two people.

I was just double checking on this myself. SW was most definitely on my list, and she was discussed fairly thoroughly by SVS as well.

And yeah, I agree, she was useful for unintentionally derailing the thread - cops like that. I was pretty surprised to see her as a target. But once you think about it, it seems a little less shocking, and more like she was actually onto something.
by indiglo
Tue Mar 22, 2016 8:40 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [END] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Replies: 9293
Views: 184613

Re: [DAY 7] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Prisoner 509378 wrote:If my projections were accurate, we're still on a 3-mislynches-to-LyLo pace. I think town's win-probability would increase significantly with an immediate cop lynch (more than it would increase with a baddie lynch on average), so I definitely agree with Sloonei. We can consolidate as a cool town club later in the phase as necessary. It sucks to lose SW who would have been a valuable member of the club, but I think we anticipated losing one of them anyway. We can add to our ranks if we find the townies among the scary people.

I have no reason for calling Quin town aside from purely reading his tone and his behavior. I think that if he's faking it, it'd be one of the best acting jobs I've ever seen. Sometimes pure earnestness is more important than evidence. We often feel like we have to lynch people because the data works against them -- but we've also all had bad games before where we're in that position ourselves. Try to remember that feeling when you're assessing Quin. I don't think he's bad.
I can assure you, even having listed him on my short list, I will remain open to the possibility of being incorrect on Quin. I have been reluctant to start suspecting him, so will keep my brain open.
by indiglo
Tue Mar 22, 2016 8:38 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [END] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Replies: 9293
Views: 184613

Re: [DAY 2] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

And, here are Wilgy's thoughts on Epi...


March 8 (before EoD in the game)
DrWilgy wrote:
ika wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
Epignosis wrote:What the hell have I been reading the past few pages?
Idk, but for some reason I want to lynch both Ika and Wolf.
Can you elaborate at all?
Not really. Bad gut feeling from the both of you... Er, you two together more so.

March 9
DrWilgy wrote:I can ship the Epi boat.

Later on March 9
DrWilgy wrote:
Epignosis wrote:Suddenly I feel...motivated.
Cuz your teammate was lynched?


March 10
DrWilgy wrote:And on the subject of Fuzz's team. It's odd that in that clusterdoodle that no one else decided to toss a vote towards Epi. If Epi was civ, I think there would've been a counter wagon formed on him.

Though... This is just based on vote layout. Correct me if there actually was a Epi boat at least 5 people strong at 1 point.

Epochgenisis... Er... Epignosis



Later March 10
DrWilgy wrote:
Spoiler: show
Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Giant post ahead. I'm gonna post a wall of quotes about what happened at EoD2. See if I can make some sense of this mess.

The CFD idea starts here. No suspects are pointed out yet.
Turnip Head wrote:I want to lead a CFD counterwagon because I don't like any of these 3, but I have no idea where to go. My vote is accomplishing nothing but I don't know where else to put it. I really hope Epi doesn't get lynched, I haven't played with him in forever and I'm liking his new approach this game.
Golden promptly agrees.
Golden wrote:I'd love to, too, but we would need to get enough people on board, and preferably including some of the current voters on the existing 3 wagons.
So does the bear:
S~V~S wrote:Talk to me. My vote is based on a ping, and I am not sure why he has other votes. When I looked in here this AM, it seemed that he had more, so if new info has come up I want to act on it, but I don't know that I can totally catch up in the time that I have.
Sloonei is open to it.
Sloonei wrote:My mind is open.
SW points out Fuzz's opportunistic vote. Ika agrees.
Silverwolf wrote:
RadicalFuzz wrote:Breaking the tie, voting for ika.

ika
This is a very opportunistic vote and probably scum.
ika wrote:I agree, when i flip town it should be looked into
Golden throws two possible names. Matt and Wilgy. Not Fuzz, but he says he is open to ideas.
Golden wrote:Let me throw out two names for this counterwagon and see if Sloon, SVS, TH, indi, silver and ika could all be behind either.

Matt
Wilgy

I'm open to other names.
Says he is also open to Serge and Fuzz. Doesn't vote them or the other two yet.
Golden wrote:Serge and Fuzz votes both opportunistic, I'd be open to either of them too.
Sloonei supports a CFD on Matt.
Sloonei wrote:Matt is probably my dark horse lynch option, if we're all gonna start throwing names into the Chinese Fire Drill pool.

Linki: I see we have started doing that! And Matt has other takers.
Jar delivery girl is on board with the whole CFD idea.
indiglo wrote:Ditto.
Sloonei disagrees with ika. Not clear whether he is against lynching Fuzz or just doesn't like ika's particular point. Looks like the later.
Sloonei wrote:
ika wrote:I agree, when i flip town it should be looked into
I do not agree. At this point it only makes sense to vote for one of the three of you, so any vote can be said to be "opportunistic".
Next, I voice against the CFD. Argument ensues. Not gonna post it here because this isn't the point of this post.

The bear makes a big point against Fuzz. Brings up the matter of Fuzz refusing to touch Ika.
S~V~S wrote:
Silverwolf wrote:
RadicalFuzz wrote:Breaking the tie, voting for ika.

ika
This is a very opportunistic vote and probably scum.
I kind of agree. This is his last postmentioning ika:
RadicalFuzz wrote:Matt is either playing from a high tightrope or is town. The risk/reward for his actions feels like high/medium if he's scum.
Sloonei is my strongest townread, as his posts have consistently made logical sense and he's avoided tunnelling on one player or interaction. It feels like he's trying to solve the game, and that's good.
You look town-y to me, for similar reasons to Sloonei. The difference is your tone reads as a little early to reach a conclusion, like you're content with finding enough facts to reach a conclusion at all, not necessarily the correct one.

Spirityo still has said next to nothing and we're a few hours out from Day 2 ending. His four posts consist of the following. A "linki - that's a good idea", one "I agree with Sloonei about the cultural differences between RYM & Syndicate", a greeting to everyone, and an apology for missing the vote. Absolutely zero content whatsoever.
Enrique I don't like because of his refusal to explain his vote on Day 1. That entire situation read as if he was nervous, if that makes sense, like he didn't have a reason at the time of his vote but decided he needed one.

I refuse to touch the Silverwolf/ika thing with a 39 & 1/2 foot pole. There's some logic to be found in interactions regarding them, but so much emotion that I'd probably end up stepping on someone's toes and they'd get mad at me for their decision to wear sandals.

My vote's going to be used to prevent a tie today. I'm indifferent as to where specifically it goes.

Turnip the reason you should vote for me is so you stop twiddling your thumbs about who to vote for.

Llama can you elaborate on your conclusion that Luffy's posts scream "cop?"
SW disagrees on the CFD. She had priorly agreed on lynching Fuzz, but not the CFD.
Silverwolf wrote:
Golden wrote:Let me throw out two names for this counterwagon and see if Sloon, SVS, TH, indi, silver and ika could all be behind either.

Matt
Wilgy

I'm open to other names.
I don't like this. I never like the idea of a last minute flash wagon at the end of the day.

Your latest posts are not really sitting well with me.

Radical Fuzz, Golden need to be looked into more tomorrow IMO.
Golden congratulates the bear. No vote yet.
Golden wrote:Good find, SVS.
Sloonei agrees with the Fuzz lynch. That gives us 4 people wanting to lynch Fuzz: him, ika, SW and SVS.
Sloonei wrote:
S~V~S wrote:
Silverwolf wrote:
RadicalFuzz wrote:Breaking the tie, voting for ika.

ika
This is a very opportunistic vote and probably scum.
I kind of agree. This is his last postmentioning ika:
RadicalFuzz wrote:Matt is either playing from a high tightrope or is town. The risk/reward for his actions feels like high/medium if he's scum.
Sloonei is my strongest townread, as his posts have consistently made logical sense and he's avoided tunnelling on one player or interaction. It feels like he's trying to solve the game, and that's good.
You look town-y to me, for similar reasons to Sloonei. The difference is your tone reads as a little early to reach a conclusion, like you're content with finding enough facts to reach a conclusion at all, not necessarily the correct one.

Spirityo still has said next to nothing and we're a few hours out from Day 2 ending. His four posts consist of the following. A "linki - that's a good idea", one "I agree with Sloonei about the cultural differences between RYM & Syndicate", a greeting to everyone, and an apology for missing the vote. Absolutely zero content whatsoever.
Enrique I don't like because of his refusal to explain his vote on Day 1. That entire situation read as if he was nervous, if that makes sense, like he didn't have a reason at the time of his vote but decided he needed one.

I refuse to touch the Silverwolf/ika thing with a 39 & 1/2 foot pole. There's some logic to be found in interactions regarding them, but so much emotion that I'd probably end up stepping on someone's toes and they'd get mad at me for their decision to wear sandals.

My vote's going to be used to prevent a tie today. I'm indifferent as to where specifically it goes.

Turnip the reason you should vote for me is so you stop twiddling your thumbs about who to vote for.

Llama can you elaborate on your conclusion that Luffy's posts scream "cop?"
Okay, now I agree.
Golden states he is willing to vote for Fuzz.

No vote yet.
Golden wrote:I'm willing to do a Fuzz vote.
Ika states he also wants to vote for Fuzz. Again, no vote yet.
ika wrote:
Golden wrote:I'm willing to do a Fuzz vote.
i can do that
Sloonei opens the flood gates. The poll doesn't show that because Sloonei would later change the vote, but he is the first to vote.
Sloonei wrote:RadicalFuzz is the crooked kind of player.
TH prefers to vote for Scotty though.
Turnip Head wrote:I voted for Scotty on the basis of the points I made in this post. It's not as strong of a point now that the Gleam wagon slowed down and two others popped up, but I still get a word feeling from how he used his vote today.
Golden votes second.
Golden wrote:RadicalFuzz
SW wants to join, but wants more support.
Silverwolf wrote:I'm willing to lynch Radical Fuzz right now if there's enough support for it.
Enrique is confused about lynching Fuzz. So is TH.
Enrique wrote:
Sloonei wrote:I am starting to feel more inclined to vote for Epi, and if I reach a point where I'm confident enough to do that, I will do it.
Is that gonna happen on its own? Are you looking for encouragement?

also why is everyone voting fuzz now wtf i wasnt serious
Turnip Head wrote:Why Fuzz? I've got linki up the wazoo
Ika votes.
ika wrote:Changed my vote

pedit: well we are @riki
Enrique agrees with my point against the CFD. The Fuzz lynch is fully moving at the time.
Enrique wrote:
Dragon D. Luffy wrote:
Golden wrote:
Dragon D. Luffy wrote:I don't like the idea of starting another wagon, when we already have 3, with less than an hour for the phase to end.

This is the PERFECT opportunity for scum to save each other if they need to.

If you don't like the current wagons then tough luck. Try to push another one earlier next day.
Every post you make is making you look more scummy, imo. Why shouldn't we try to push one now, when so many people think all of the current wagons don't have a lot of merit?
If people don't like any of the 3 wagons then sure, go ahead.

But inviting people to look for a fourth one reeks of an attempt to deflect this lynch into something else.

I don't like the timing of this at all. Because all the scum who are seeing their possible teammates get lynched will take the chance to jump out.
Good post.
Enrique votes for one of the movers of the Fuzz wagon:
Enrique wrote:Golden I really don't like this.
SW votes. Then the bear. Then me.
Silverwolf wrote:Radical Fuzz

If this doesn't happen today, I'm voting it tomorrow.
S~V~S wrote:I went to Fuzz

Tied it backup.
Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Fine.

RadicalFuzz

I hate this plan but if we are not lynching gleam, the Fuzz is the next in line.

I'm not lynching ika today.
Okay I'm gonna stop here with the votes. The rest is history and can be seen in the poll.

The point is this post was to provide a way for people to look at the flow. Who started the CFD, who pushed, how the idea for lynching Fuzz was developed, who came up with it and who pushed it too. This is useful for the point I want to make next.

Also Sig's post against the lynch hadn't come yet, but would eventually come. Will quote it here since he seems to be a big suspect:
sig wrote:Wow why Fuzz this makes no sense I think this is a baddie driven CFD to save a teammate, notice almost the same people are up for lynches today as yesterday? I stand by my theory that one was mafia and that we had some minor save last phase, I think we are seeing a much bigger save attempt this phase. With a mafia team thhis big a CFD is easy to pull off I think this is scum driven to save one of the three leading people. Most likely Ike or Epi.

Can someone give me any reason for the Fuzz lynch?

I also really dislike DDL switch and his reasons. I actually am agreeing with Llama about him what about a Dragon lycnh?

linki: DDL and Golden are my top two scum reads, either Ike or Epi are there partners. Possibly Wilgy as well.
Ok here is the point. I think Golden is bad.

The reason: the way he moved in this lynch is VERY similar to how he handles bussing in other games where he is bad.

Let me explain how the fiende operates: he is never the one to start the wagon where his teammates are lynched. He waits for someone to bring it up and stays on the fence, looking contributive. But as soon as he smells the wagon, he makes sure he is one of the first to jump on it, in order to keep appearances. He won't jump unless he sees the clear flow of the thread going against the teammate though. But when they do, he will act fast and secute the towncred that lynch will provide. Golden is capable of lynching his entire team, then winning the game alone on a mountain of towncred he carefully obtained along the game. He did it in Economics: got two of his three teammates lynched and made sure to look responsible for it, even when he was never the one to bring the lynch up. He was the first to vote on both lynches, even though he wasn't the one starting the suspicion (TH, the cop, was).

http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 85#p148585

http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 51#p147451

So it matches with this game. he didn't bring up the CFD. He agreed with it after TH did. He didn't bring up the Fuzz lynch, he actually brought up 3 counter-examples before and attempted to push wagons on them. He only said he was going to vote for Fuzz after four other players did.

And now, he is acting like if everyone on that lynch is automatically town, and the ones who opposed the CFD the most are automatically mafia. A dangerous and absolute view, which doesn't fit an intelligent and questioning person like him. it is perfectly possible for that lynch to contain 1 or even more cops. They could be sacrificing their teammate. Heck, that wasn't even clear it would happen, since the day ended with more votes on ika than on Fuzz. It's likely this was a coordinated job, with some players voting for ika to counter the wagon and some voting for Fuzz in order to split the team. They took the risk, and it didn't pay off since they lost a teammate, but now they are trying to reap the benefits of towncred and/or creating new suspects.

I know this whole thing is a huge tinfoil, but it feels right to me. I'm willing to act on it next day.

That doesn't mean I don't have other suspects though. The ika wagon is probably full of them. I don't like the way Soneji has been playing, for example, and I see the points on Enrique and/or Sig. But I'm gonna pursue this theory first.

I don't like Golden's absolute views. Only siths deal in absolutes. This doesn't sound like a civ wanting to figure out the game.

I'll finish catching up to see if there is anything else worth replying to then disappear again until Day 3. Bye.
So we are lynching Epi tonight right?
by indiglo
Tue Mar 22, 2016 8:26 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [END] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Replies: 9293
Views: 184613

Re: [DAY 7] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Sloonei wrote:I'm all for people putting their votes on their top suspects early on in the day phase. I think everyone should be voting early, and the more votes we get the better sense we'll all have of where the consensus is. BUT obviously, as the day phase progresses we'll need to start to consolidate our votes in one place. We just need to find the player we can all agree with.
Exactly. I haven't been voting this early so far because I haven't felt so certain. We have a good list. We have 48 hours. Let's do it together.
by indiglo
Tue Mar 22, 2016 8:24 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [END] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Replies: 9293
Views: 184613

Re: Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Here we go!


March 7
Epignosis wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
thellama73 wrote: If humans were perfect, this game would be impossible.
I'm perfect. Are you?
Well, I'm sick right now, and I consider that apersonal moral failing, so I guess not.

Who is a cop, Epi? Is it Dragon? (hint: yes)
As of this point, I'd say Wilgy, and if Wilgy is bad, gleam is with him after that wild speculation in defense of Wilgy.

March 8 (before EoD in the game)
Epignosis wrote:Sorry Wilgy. I can't vote for you anymore. Something else came up.
Nerolunar wrote:Wait, quite a few people have been voicing disagreement against the Gleam wagon. Is this a coordinated cop effort to steer the thread in a specific direction? :ponder:
Go on...
Nerolunar wrote:Wow.

Well, if you can´t reference to posts and find bits of proof then how do you want us to agree with you? Why do you want to do ISO´s if you don´t want to analyse them?

Man. :eye:
Uh-huh. Nerolunar. Is the thread being steered? Who is doing the driving?
Sloonei wrote:
Epignosis wrote:What the hell have I been reading the past few pages?
Have you figured it out yet?
No. A grammar and spelling manual would do wonders. :meany:
ika wrote:i do analize them
Ooooow. :puppy:


Later on March 8 (after EoD in the game)
Epignosis wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Epignosis wrote:indiglo said I bounced back and forth on gleam.

I voted him and asked him to talk. He talked. I moved my vote.

I said gleam gets lynched or killed often early and I didn't want to be a part of that.

I later said if Wilgy is bad, then gleam is too. That's an if-then proposition.

MM says I refused to vote gleam...but part of his post against me is that I voted gleam.

Is that a fair summary of my dealings with gleam?

Was there any "bouncing?"
Part of my post is that you voted gleam, yes. That was the point. You voted for gleam, then later refused to vote for gleam after you moved your vote. You used those words too.

You later offered a scenario where gleam was bad, which relied on DrWilgy also being bad. Why did you later state that you don't understand the six votes on gleam? You offered a reason for gleam being bad. Why did you dismiss others' reasons for him being bad?

I am inferring from this that it is okay for you to suspect gleam, but not okay for others to suspect gleam.
I don't understand the reasons why people think gleam is bad.

And I no longer think Wilgy is bad either.


March 9
Epignosis wrote:
Dragon D. Luffy wrote:@Epignosis, what do you think about Wilgy right now?

I mean, you said you think he's a civ, but what made you change your mind?

Dunno if you have the time to answer this now, but I'll leave the question for when you do.
I won't be voting for him. I don't think it's a good idea to say why.

Return to “[END] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts”