The Syndicate

I will be gone most of the evening, and I sure don't think it's Golden. Russ is a much better choice.

Rbzmncaeaei wrote: linki @Epi: Welcome to RYM. Don't like it? Deal.

Rude.

Which is why I didn't!

Epignosis wrote:
Rbzmncaeaei wrote:linki: All talk is still preferable to nothing whatsoever.
I don't agree. Flooding the thread is a way that can keep quieter civilians disengaged.

That's definitely true. I know I didn't feel like reading the twenty or so pages of material I saw when I got home from a very busy workday.

Devin the Omniscient wrote:
thellama73 wrote:I swear I will try to pay attention to this game over the weekend, guys. There's some RL drama right now that is sort of consuming my mental faculties. PM me if interested!
RL Comes First. Hope everything turns out alright for you!

Oh, it will. I'm just a little distracted right now Thanks for the well-wishes!

I swear I will try to pay attention to this game over the weekend, guys. There's some RL drama right now that is sort of consuming my mental faculties. PM me if interested!

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:
thellama73 wrote:Are you saying B is for Baddie?
gun to head reads, just like in Economics. go go go
B is for Baddie. they are all bad.
Cool do the rest of them.

Nah, your fancy image is already done, and I didn't come out too badly, so I'm fine where I am.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:
thellama73 wrote:Are you saying B is for Baddie?
gun to head reads, just like in Economics. go go go

B is for Baddie. they are all bad.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:BCORNETT

BEA

BLACK ROCK

BULLZEYE

Are you saying B is for Baddie?

This was a very good/bad result. I am really happy/sad.

Diiny wrote:
Rbzmncaeaei wrote:
MacDougall wrote:Apologies for the low content stuff over the last couple of days. I will get a chance to eleborate on my Llama gut read during my lunch break.

I like the LC lynch though. Especially over seaside. I have no real read on bcornett and I don't think I could be swayed to vote that way.
How does one elaborate on a gut read? It's not a rhetorical question, teach me.
I thought it meant he'd try to match his gut's read with an actual read, though he could elaborate the gut read more literally by pointing out exactly which posts made his gut feel irksome

Explaining on someone else's behalf rather than letting them answer themselves? Vote.

Vote Diiny.

Epignosis wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
Epignosis wrote: Hello, I'm Epignosis.
Hi, Epignosis. How are you?
Tired. You?
Also tired. I basically just got home from work, and I have to be on radio at 7:30 tomorrow morning to talk about the education secretary.
The new boss or the old boss? I'll spare you what The Who had to say about it.

I used that exact quote in the article I wrote on the subject.

Epignosis wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
Epignosis wrote: Hello, I'm Epignosis.
Hi, Epignosis. How are you?
Tired. You?

Also tired. I basically just got home from work, and I have to be on radio at 7:30 tomorrow morning to talk about the education secretary.

Epignosis wrote: Hello, I'm Epignosis.

Hi, Epignosis. How are you?

Rbzmncaeaei wrote:
thellama73 wrote:I think the K4J kill was more likely to come from an RYMer than a Syndicater, so I will concentrate my attentions there.
Something about your posts today feel a little staged/rehearsed however you want to put it.

Thank you. I like to be well-prepared.

Strawhenge wrote:
thellama73 wrote:I think the K4J kill was more likely to come from an RYMer than a Syndicater, so I will concentrate my attentions there.
Guys, my eye is twitching uncontrollably. Violently. I don't know what's...I can't...

Llama, how did you come to this conclusion? Why wouldn't a Syndicat—you know, such as yourself for instance :o—kill k4j?

Because, being a Syndicator myself, I know how we think. I can't think of a fellow site member who would go for K4J first. It seems too random. It's just a hunch of course, but that's the assumption I'm going to operate under for now.

I think the K4J kill was more likely to come from an RYMer than a Syndicater, so I will concentrate my attentions there.

Wow, bloody night, RIP everybody. THere are a lot of posts for me to catch up on, but I'll make sure to vote for a baddie today.

motel room wrote:
thellama73 wrote:I'm not sure how I feel about this MacDougal character.
Seems genuine to me so far. What about him makes you feel otherwise?

His overall hostility requires evaluation. I'm not sure I think he's malevolent, but he's someone I definitely want to watch.

I'm not sure how I feel about this MacDougal character.

Question for the group:
Was Bea's reaction to one early, changeable vote an overreaction or an appropriate reaction?
Discuss.

Current track: Brian Eno - Sparrowfall (3) (1:24)

Diiny wrote:How would you feel if I told you I've attempted to tried my Detective Aggressive Scumhunt von Threadleader strats as town on multiple occasions, and got lynched as town in the last game for the reason you're suggesting?

Yeah, that happens to me a lot too.

Current track: Bonzo Dog Doo Dah Band - Joke Shop Man (1:23)

There are different types of baddies. There's Sir Belendsalot, there's Mr. "Look How Helpful I am Being, Guys!", there's Empty Statement Lass. Then there's Detective Aggressive Scumhunt von Threadleader.

I am reading Diiny as this last type.

Diiny wrote:Day 1 is about MAKING concrete evidence through stirring shit and provoking reactions, not just waiting for it to happen and throwing your vote onto random people.

This is very true, and I'm voting for you.

Yeah, I would never classify JJJ as a low poster. He participates.

Rbzmncaeaei wrote: Do you have any suspicions at this point?

I actually don't, which is kind of frustrating. We have 48 hours though. They will come with time.

While we're here, I might as well ask: are you bad?

Current track: Johann Sebastian Bach - Invention Number 1 in C Major (1:19)

Rbzmncaeaei wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
Rbzmncaeaei wrote: linki llama: Gracias, but why didn't you call him out on that at the time? Too busy in defense mode?
I was joking about that part. I ask people that exact question on Day 1 almost every game, so that is why JJJ asked it to me.

That certainly puts a damper. I got no impression at all that 3J wasn't serious.

Pro tip, though: If you ask someone if they are bad, and they don't deny it, they usually turn out to be bad.

Rbzmncaeaei wrote: linki llama: Gracias, but why didn't you call him out on that at the time? Too busy in defense mode?

I was joking about that part. I ask people that exact question on Day 1 almost every game, so that is why JJJ asked it to me.

Agreed that just asking someone whether they are bad on Day 1 is super scummy.

That's a pretty good case, Rbzmzmnzzzxzxzxzxz. I'll have to sleep on it.

Rbzmncaeaei wrote:So far in the game I've seen a total of four posts that I have found suspicious. To make matters more interesting (and possibly help me with my conclusions) I'd like whoever's interested and/or bored to guess which ones before I say.

I bet one of them is mine!

BWT, I'm disappointed. Now you don't get to call my NKs....if I'm bad.

I like Autechre a lot more than I like Aphex Twin.

This is going to be a fun game.

thellama73 wrote:
bcornett24 wrote:
thellama73 wrote:Okay, here's my offer.

I will let anyone who votes for me choose my night kills for me, if I am bad.
Scum one established

Consarn it.

bcornett24 wrote:
thellama73 wrote:Okay, here's my offer.

I will let anyone who votes for me choose my night kills for me, if I am bad.
Scum one established

;haha:

Ricochet wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:But really though llama, are you bad?
No, sir.
Then there's no point for anyone to vote for you, because they wouldn't receive squat.

Typical llama intoxication, burning down the house.

That's true. I hope people will vote for me anyway.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:But really though llama, are you bad?

No, sir.

birdwithteeth11 wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
birdwithteeth11 wrote:
thellama73 wrote:Okay, here's my offer.

I will let anyone who votes for me choose my night kills for me, if I am bad.
Why would you even entertain such an idea?

Unless you're bad.
I'm not bad, so it's a pretty worthless incentive package, but if I am, you get to choose my first NK! Lucky you!
Fair enough. But what if I choose to NK you?

Self targeting is like self-voting, illegal in this game. Rule 6.1

TheFloyd73 wrote:Well, here we go

Vote for me, because we have the same number.

birdwithteeth11 wrote:
thellama73 wrote:Okay, here's my offer.

I will let anyone who votes for me choose my night kills for me, if I am bad.
Why would you even entertain such an idea?

Unless you're bad.

I'm not bad, so it's a pretty worthless incentive package, but if I am, you get to choose my first NK! Lucky you!

Okay, here's my offer.

I will let anyone who votes for me choose my night kills for me, if I am bad.

birdwithteeth11 wrote:Since MM upped the stakes once already (ONCE IN A LIIIIFETIIIME!), I would like to provide a counter-offer.

Anyone who votes for me will be exempt from getting my vote in any lynch for the duration of the game.

Since I already voted for you, is that retroactive?

bcornett24 wrote:Just to make sure I understand this, if I vote for people in the poll I need to vote for them in the thread as well? This is the same thing correct? And this is our lynch vote as well?

Yes, that is correct.

I guess I'll vote for Birdwithteeth and Metalmarsh, since they offered such nice incentive packages.

I think I would be a good assistant too, but I'll let you guys decide that.

Current track: Dead Can Dance - Echolalia (1:17)

Search found 44 matches