The Syndicate

kneel4justice wrote:

Elohcin wrote:Even though I didn't win, I had a lot of fun and will proudly wear the players banner. I almost switched the lynch to K4J the day before the last day and second guessed myself. It would have changed everything too as K4J was the one who forced my vote on SVS the last day. Then with everyone voting ME, I used my lynch switch that day, lynching SVS (as the person I switched the lynch to had to have at least one vote). I was really hoping BWT would come in and vote K4J so I could switch it to him :/ Ah well...like I said, I still had a ton of fun!

:O Why did you want to switch it to me?!

AceofSpaces wrote:

S~V~S wrote:Well, we knew he was not a civ.

Yeah, but I was hoping he'd be a legit baddie. We *need* to get a full fledged baddie lynch under our belt.

Turnip Head wrote:Is there anyone other than me that you are suspicious of? Unless Sorsha was the sassy black woman - it's possible that she was, I had no read on her - there are at least two separate baddies alive, on separate teams. I can't be both of them. I am neither of them.

Ace survived a lynch. FH was highly suspicious of him because of it, though she did not seem be suspicious of me. What do you make of that, SVS? And what do you make of Ace? Also, what do you think about Elohcin this game?

kneel4justice wrote:I think SVS is bad too.

Epignosis wrote:

Turnip Head wrote:Yeah Epi but if the Trumps had just let FH be lynched instead of saving her to frame her, she would be dead, and the Trumps would still have their buttsore ability to later frame someone or save someone. There was no reason for DH to use the buttsore ability during a civvie's lynch, especially since no one else was really up for the lynch that day.

That no one was really up for the lynch that day makes for a perfect frame up opportunity- run two lynches with one move. If you use the power to save yourself, then you've drawn attention to yourself and you are doomed (see Rey).

Turnip Head wrote:I don't want to be smited by Epi's phallic hammer. Good thing I have the perfect white card for this question.

Epignosis wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:

AceofSpaces wrote:I agree that DH has been sneaky through this game for awhile now. That, and he totally wasted his vote last day in the most obvious fashion.

YOu of all people should know I'm busy with school and Super Heroes and other stuff. Wow.

I am in three games, I have three children, I do all the cooking here, I am in D&D and Super Heroes (though I'm not sure what to do in that one ), I am on the Eclectic Team on Prog Archives, I am taking a World Literature course that requires like a novel a week, I drink like a fish, and I'm a chronic masturbator.

Epignosis wrote:

Elohcin wrote:Epi, at least we know it won't be your own

I've lost 33 pounds.

First I want to say that I am so glad to have a few days off from cakes Seven cakes and over 100 cupcakes this week and I am beat.

Turnip Head wrote:I also think it is worth discussing publicly who we intend on voting to rez. If we don't talk about it, we're handing the the baddies the advantage to rez one of their own (or even worse, rez a civ into a baddie role).

Flyin' High wrote:Another possible rezz candidate is johns2jj who was lynched and flipped civvie.

Epignosis wrote:

Elohcin wrote:I am sorry I missed the vote. I was on a field trip with my kids and looked at the end time without signing in so I had the wrong time. But...I think I can make it up to you by making you all cringe.

Coprophagia during sex!

Glad to know my children have a mother who think about these things.



+1

Elohcin wrote:

Elohcin wrote:

thellama73 wrote:

johns2jj wrote:I am voting llama unless something else changes my mind. I would rather vote someone less active but I don't have enough evidence for them yet. I am on the fence about lynching people who under participate.

I don't have a grudge against you, I just think your bad, and this post does you no favors.
1. There was no tie (that we know about)
2. Even if there was a tie, and the card czar got to break it, how does me surviving it make me bad? That is a non-sequitur.

S~V~S wrote: I do understand what people are saying about John~ and his last few responses seem more like there is some baddieism going on. But up to that point, I am not sure why llama was so sure, when in only his second game John behaves similarly to his prior game in which he gave a very good showing.

I was never "so sure." He was just my best guess on Day 1. His Day 2 posts have made me more confident that I was on to something though.

That's what she said

10

I hope this is good enough because I will not be here all day. Off to a field trip with my kids.

That's what she said.

11

One more for good measure. Hey, nobody said I couldn't quote myself.

Elohcin wrote:

thellama73 wrote:

johns2jj wrote:I am voting llama unless something else changes my mind. I would rather vote someone less active but I don't have enough evidence for them yet. I am on the fence about lynching people who under participate.

I don't have a grudge against you, I just think your bad, and this post does you no favors.
1. There was no tie (that we know about)
2. Even if there was a tie, and the card czar got to break it, how does me surviving it make me bad? That is a non-sequitur.

S~V~S wrote: I do understand what people are saying about John~ and his last few responses seem more like there is some baddieism going on. But up to that point, I am not sure why llama was so sure, when in only his second game John behaves similarly to his prior game in which he gave a very good showing.

I was never "so sure." He was just my best guess on Day 1. His Day 2 posts have made me more confident that I was on to something though.

That's what she said

10

I hope this is good enough because I will not be here all day. Off to a field trip with my kids.

thellama73 wrote:

johns2jj wrote:I am voting llama unless something else changes my mind. I would rather vote someone less active but I don't have enough evidence for them yet. I am on the fence about lynching people who under participate.

I don't have a grudge against you, I just think your bad, and this post does you no favors.
1. There was no tie (that we know about)
2. Even if there was a tie, and the card czar got to break it, how does me surviving it make me bad? That is a non-sequitur.

S~V~S wrote: I do understand what people are saying about John~ and his last few responses seem more like there is some baddieism going on. But up to that point, I am not sure why llama was so sure, when in only his second game John behaves similarly to his prior game in which he gave a very good showing.

I was never "so sure." He was just my best guess on Day 1. His Day 2 posts have made me more confident that I was on to something though.

S~V~S wrote:Linki@ K4J~ yeah, this poll ends at a weird time for me, so I will not be around much either, although i did get caught up on my reading this AM.

S~V~S wrote:I am sorry I was scarce yesterday, I was concentrating on my other game after work.

I do understand what people are saying about John~ and his last few responses seem more like there is some baddieism going on. But up to that point, I am not sure why llama was so sure, when in only his second game John behaves similarly to his prior game in which he gave a very good showing. Had i done as well as he and moved from a BTS into a non-BTS situation, I might have tried to look the same since several people were convinced he was a civ in that game, and I had a hell of a time lynching him.

But this could be my own bias~ I am ever paranoid Llama is throwing people under the bus lol.

FZ obviously touched a never somewhere. Don't feel bad, FZ~ someone obviously feared you, it's a mark of respect (or at least that's what I tell myself all the time).

And poor Eloh, what a tacky curse, lol. I find it odd that Eloh would be targeted, though. She had not really stood out to me at all.

johns2jj wrote:Wow, this is going to be very difficult to track people's votes when they can be forced to vote a certain way. And all the +1, ,+2, or +3 votes. This game may be stacked a little for the baddies.

Sorsha wrote:Was there a tie?

johns2jj wrote:

FZ. wrote:

johns2jj wrote:I did not no vote because it seems some hosts may react to that. I would rather not miss out on anything because I did not vote.

What do you think about llama's suspicions? Would you agree with him if it were someone else and not you?

I think he may have a grudge against me for how I played in the last game but I can't be for sure. He tends to make passable arguments for those he votes for but as admitted by himself he has lately been lynching civs. I do not know anyone's play style well enough to believe anything they say yet but if you feel he has made a good enough case than I can't dissuade you. I think he is most likely bad because he survived the kill when in this game someone breaks ties.

insertnamehere wrote:We're all fucked aren't we. The baddies in this game are just TOO GOOD.

insertnamehere wrote:We're all fucked aren't we. The baddies in this game are just TOO GOOD.

Sorsha wrote:

Hedgeowl wrote:

kneel4justice wrote:

boo wrote:Night 1 End: Bringin Reagan Back

Ronald Reagan was brought back in time. The time-continuum was not changed. Weird…?

FZ got murdered by… doin’ it in the butt. Well, stay classy FZ.

Today’s question:
Daddy, why is Mommy crying?


FZ. has been killed. Thanks for playing!
It is now Day 2. You have 24 hours to lynch someone, please get your answer cards in in the first 23 hours of the lynch. Metalmarsh is your Card Czar today.

This SUCKS.

RIPiywg FZ! I am surprised FZ was killed early again. Not sure if because she was unknown or because of her suspicions. Will have to do a reread.

FZ was doing quite a bit of baddie hunting on day one so the mafia targeting her isn't really a surprise. She voted for llama but it looks like she would have switched her vote at the end (to me, I think) if anyone else had had enough vote to keep llama from getting the most.

Its kinda hard to tell who she actually found the most suspicious though.

And even though FZ is dead I would hope johns will still answer this for the rest of us....

FZ. wrote:

johns2jj wrote:I did not no vote because it seems some hosts may react to that. I would rather not miss out on anything because I did not vote.

What do you think about llama's suspicions? Would you agree with him if it were someone else and not you?

kneel4justice wrote:

boo wrote:Night 1 End: Bringin Reagan Back

Ronald Reagan was brought back in time. The time-continuum was not changed. Weird…?

FZ got murdered by… doin’ it in the butt. Well, stay classy FZ.

Today’s question:
Daddy, why is Mommy crying?


FZ. has been killed. Thanks for playing!
It is now Day 2. You have 24 hours to lynch someone, please get your answer cards in in the first 23 hours of the lynch. Metalmarsh is your Card Czar today.

This SUCKS.