The Syndicate

Golden 2 wrote:rezz pls for crucial numerical civ support

Be a good boy and stay dead will ya?

Lipsticklacey 2 wrote:I truly found him unpleasant, and I had zero desire to continue playing with him in this game or ever again.

save it for post game will ya?

Reywas 2 wrote:A "RIP" would be nice, bitches

Welcome to hell.

Well timed vote Reywas 2. At the final possible second.

I wonder. Is there a tiebreaker among us? Last time there was a tie nobody died.

Bass 2 wrote:That's precisely why I'm abstaining. I know who I want to vote for and why, but I'm interested in seeing who breaks the tie and where the other vote goes after that. I'm sorry if it appears that I'm toying with your life, for what it's worth.

The time is near. The tie is already broken for the time being, but who would you vote for if you were not abstaining?

Leaving this alone until post lynch will be a bad look and invalidate everything you say about it. If me or Cookie dies, if somebody flips civ, you could easily just say "I would've voted for the other guy" after the fact. If somebody flips mafia "I was totally going to vote for him I swear".

Not to mention the fact that if one of us flips mafia (I wont, mind you) you already look bad by default just for the distancing throwaway vote on it's own.

Bass 2 wrote:This is interesting. Something else interesting, I'm going to vote for myself so as to not break the tie between boo 2 and Cookie 2. Depending on their alignments, this phase could either be a colossal waste of time and an opportunity bountiful for intentional misdirection, or could give us a good lead to go after someone.

Just remember, there is a tie and you hold one of the last 3 votes that can break it.

Scotty 2 wrote:I think I shall vote now. I'm going to vote for Cookie 2. I agree that Cookie 2 is likely bad taking advantage of the boo 2 situation. I'm hoping from this point boo 2 will settle down and play the game moving forward. I don't really think boo is a baddie.

Epignosis 2 wrote:Well Reywas 2 being satisfied with my response really took the wind out of my sails of martyrdom, but what can you do?

Looking over everything again I agree with Reywas the Cookie comment, also if we believe Black Rock 2 was innocent she made a case against Cookie. Today I would rather lynch Cookie 2 then Boo 2, for that reason I will be voting for Cookie.

Scotty 2 you could have just posted your thoughts and ignored the drama this seems like a rather weak reason for not posting.

That's true... if I myself felt comfortable in the thread at that time. I felt removed from the game and when I was reading the thread there was so much negativity I asked the hosts to replace me. I'm not good with negativity. Since I can't be replaced and I feel like dropping out for something that had nothing to do with me is lame I decided to sit back and wait. You may think this is weak but I'm not about to change my personality.

Shortening quotes is hard on my phone, but to the top part, I have a bit more motivation now than I did initially to play the game.

Reywas 2 wrote:After mulling it over I'm mostly satisfied with Epig 2's response to my case. But I'll keep thinking on it.

I'm looking at a Cookie 2 vote today. Her comment about win cons can't be ignored. Why aren't more people talking about that? And she was a suspect before this boo 2 stuff happened. Maybe she truly feels like boo 2 needs to die for his attitude but that doesn't mean she isn't a baddie taking advantage of the situation.

Win con comments? I think I missed those.

I am tired of rehashing it as well. I've been trying to continue past it but it's constantly "guys look a this guy he's such an asshole. Right guys? Isnt he an asshole?". I'm not letting that go on completely ignored.

Maybe stop calling me an asshat, or an asshole, or any other various insults of your choosing, and we can all ignore it for the duration of the game. I mean you know I havent been personally attacking any of you. Express name calling or otherwise. I may have been a bit condescending at times yes. But I'm not running around specifically calling any of you names.

Golden 2 wrote:

You're pretty good.

Cookie 2 wrote:lol, I knew the whole "this is my last post" was an empty threat.

Call it as you will. That was what I originally intended.

Are you mad that you no longer have a reason to vote for me know that I am participating again? That's unfortunate for you.

Also lol at "sanctimonious". I actually had to google that one believe it or not. I didn't see it the first time.

Nice to meet you pot. I'm kettle.

Also I am going to vote for one of the people that votes for me btw. While some of you, if not all of you, may be genuinely upset with me, all it would take for mafia to force a mislynch in this situation is to turn their reactions to the incident up to 11, and place a vote on me. It's an extremely easy set up. My nephew could think of that one.

And maybe not literally, but killing me will rewind time. Back to Day 3 to be specific. No that isn't an "info dump". Simply a figure of speech.

Lipsticklacey 2 wrote:He's already made the game less fun for other players, and hasn't been modkilled.

You appear to be oblivious. So I'll let you in on a secret.

So have you.

And I dont mean you've had an effect on me. Others. They may say something after the game, they may not. But believe me, I am not an isolated incident in this game.

Going back to the page before this one to get caught up. As annoyed as I am with this little pitchfork mob I have acquired, something isn't letting me drop the game.

Some of you would make good trolls. You do a great job of making me reply when I already told myself not to.

Cookie your reason for voting me is pretty damn terrible. Not because it could result in my death, of because I'm civ, but for the sheer numbers game of it. There are 15 players are alive right? Only one person died that we know for a fact was Mafia. And there are probably third parties at play. Given the starting numbers of players, I would guess that the game started with a solid 5 Mafia players. Add in that there are usually 1-3 third parties in every game and the possibility that about 4 Mafia are left, we maybe have somewhere around 8 civs left.

Those aren't the kind of numbers that would allow for you to be playing wannabe moderator trying to get me bumped off for no reason other than that you don't like me. Killing me is of no use to town. If you want to vote me, go ahead. But at least make a viable case for me before you do.

Reywas 2 wrote:Maybe he'll come to his senses and come back to the game

What so I can have pearl clutchers breathing down my neck with how they have a "better" sense of morals and ethics than I do?

Pass. Take that high horse business elsewhere. I hate it when people feel obligated to be offended on behalf of a person they know nothing about. It's fake as hell.

I'm not apologizing to anybody other than the person I made that joke about. I dont care what the rest of you think about me or what I said. I know how I meant it, and so does the other person. They had issues other than the joke itself. Attempting to actually play this would be far more trouble than it's worth.

So like I said earlier. I am reading the thread to determine who I should vote for until I die. I will very likely not be posting at all. Until then, for the sake of your own fragile little hearts and virgin eyes, you should probably just drop this before you all get tired of talking about it and whip yourselves up into a frenzy over something that has come and gone.

It ends here.

Continue playing like normal. Lest you make yourselves appear as children.

For the record, I hate being censored. I am in the process of making amends with a certain somebody, but only because the line was actually closer to my foot rather than farther. I am not apologizing because anybody wants me to, or is attempting to make me to, but because I want to, and when you fuck up with a friend you gotta eat your words and smooth that shit over.

That said, I am about done with this game because I will not play with a fucking muzzle on my face and a potential ban sentence dangling over my head. The only thing stopping me from replying to certain people in the true way that I normally speak, is my respect for certain other people who I happen to enjoy the company of. Even then, only barely does it hinder me.

I will come in here and place votes so as to not make the hosts resort to mod killing me out of respect for having created and hosting the game.

Certain other changes will happen, but that is tied to my real account. Not this one.

Friendly life tip: Lighten up. Enjoy life more. None of us really has that long to do so.

That will be my final post in this thread.

Cobalt 2 wrote:

boo 2 wrote:

Cobalt 2 wrote:You're kidding me right.

Am I?

Are you?

Look at my posts. Do you think typing the alphabet was all that was required? Get real.

Jesus dude. You piss me off so much. Pay attention or I will get mad and ask you to lynch me tomorrow.

This post has been edited due to offensive content. Let me be clear that this kind of abusive and discriminatory comment and behavior will not be tolerated here.

Cobalt 2 wrote:You're kidding me right.

Am I?

Are you?

TRIPLE POST

boo 2 wrote:
If Scotty 2 died there would be no love lost from me

I forgot to put this in the post, but I mean to say this in the context as that his existence in the game does not mean anything to me, and I am no expressly defending him. Just putting it out that I think that line I quoted from you was particularly lazy and lacking a proper thought process.

Cobalt 2 wrote:
You weren't replaced, so you could have been scum not paying attention until now.

What if I was scum not paying attention until now?
What if you were?

We can go all day with that.

If Scotty 2 died there would be no love lost from me. If you're gonna start slinging shit, then by all means. But at least make it good shit you're slinging. Instead of this random shit that has about as many holes in it as a hooker's fishnets.

Cobalt 2 wrote:

Scotty 2 wrote:Ok, I'm here and ready to get my head in the game. I am super behind so I have no idea what has been going on. I apologize to my dear hostess's for putting up with me and thank you for your understanding. I'm going to start by reading the host posts and see who has died. I had to check the first page to see if I was still alive.

You weren't replaced, so you could have been scum not paying attention until now.

In fact, I would say we're not going to hear from you for a while.

No fucking sir I'm not rolling in the grass head over heels about a secret recruiter flipping. Great. Roles gone, but so fucking what. That was some lazy ass scum hunting. I expect more.

Shit I DID MORE and I was fucking having to sing the ABCs at the same time.

smh

I feel like I would need a trilogy of prequels to understand the context to this post.

And you weren't singing the ABC's? That was Lipstick that was doing that right?

More importantly, I really dont like the tone of

Cobalt 2 wrote: In fact, I would say we're not going to hear from you for a while.

S~V~S wrote:

Roxy wrote:

boo 2 wrote:

Golden 2 wrote:

boo 2 wrote:Wow what the fuck I clicked on Elo why did it vote Llama

What? Did you even vote in time?

Yeah I did. I looked at the results after to see if anybody else voted right before me and it said I voted Llama. Rigged poll is rigged.

It is impossible to rig the polls as you suggest.

As the host says, this is impossible and cannot happen, from a software perspective. the only way a misvote will register is if there is a mechanical error, meaning you accidentally pushed the other option without realizing it. Polls cannot be rigged in this way.

Jesus Christ. You guys are just incapable of taking a joke around here arent you?

Golden 2 wrote:

boo 2 wrote:Wow what the fuck I clicked on Elo why did it vote Llama

What? Did you even vote in time?

Yeah I did. I looked at the results after to see if anybody else voted right before me and it said I voted Llama. Rigged poll is rigged.

Wow what the fuck I clicked on Elo why did it vote Llama

Ricochet 2 wrote:linki @ boo - boo, I had the sense you were one of those who most agreed with me about lynching golden. Do you now feel it's possible there are two trackers?

Of course I think It's possible. I'm the one who brought it up.

I am not 100% on it though. It is only speculation after all.

for the record, I am confused that Gamer Guy 2 came back from the dead and has yet to make an appearance. He is a confirmed civ, which is a very powerful position to be in. Why is he not taking advantage of it?

Lastly, a seemer appears as a different player when killed right? Assuming that Golden is the seemer, wouldnt we be lynching him for inconclusive results as he would just appear as something other than the seemer again? We would gain neither peace of mind or useful information from it from how I look at it.

Ricochet 2 wrote:The two of every role thing doesn't work to me because there are 25 of us which is not even.

Do you know how many different roles are in this game? I dont recall this being specified as a role madness game, so there could very well only be double of a few specific roles, and then some roleless.

I mean I'm not putting a lot of stock into it, but sometimes you have to look at the weird shit to make sure you encompass all possibilities, however unlikely they may be.

Synonym 2 wrote:

boo 2 wrote:

Cookie 2 wrote:Plus the mafia influenced circumstances of his death.

Might I ask where you acquired that information? Unless I missed something, all they did was kill him. I don't remember seeing anything else.

Was that a scum slip?

Surely you don't think so little of me. Here I was with you in my civ list, and you go and say something like that. The nerve of some people.

Am I wrong in assuming that Mafia made that kill?

Cookie 2 wrote:Plus the mafia influenced circumstances of his death.

Might I ask where you acquired that information? Unless I missed something, all they did was kill him. I don't remember seeing anything else.

I'm waiting to see if Synonym has anything to say.

How should I put it. Something feels............wrong.

Thinking outside the box here.

What if there are two of every role? If there were two seemers, and two trackers, that would explain the inconsistency yes?

Sig 2 wrote: So, NEITHER way works, going by the hosts' rules. Which means there are shenanigans here that we are not aware of.

We need to go deeper.

You know, looking at certain things in the thread, I think the hosts leave a tell for player resurrections. If I am correct, that may not be the last we see of Timmer 2. Perhaps my aluminum hat is on too snug.

Golden 2 wrote:

boo 2 wrote:

Golden 2 wrote:

Sig 2 wrote:You waited util the end, you easily could have asked the hosts in PM if a "blown" vote could be changed in thread. You EASILY could have known Roxy would say no before doing it.

A seemer is RANDOMLY assigned a different role upon death. The level of coincidence here is astounding.

I mean, go ahead and make your case to the others, but I'm not buying it.

I voted at the end of the period in which I managed to do reads on players and decide on a vote. It's clear on paper. The only question I addressed the Hosts was in the open, right after I blew the vote, you're the one easily adding "coulda/woulda" to what happened. I wanted to correct my vote on "BR", if possible, as soon as possible, I didn't act like slipping Jimmy.

How do you know seemers are randomly assigned in this setup? Did you clarify this with the Hosts first?

Here, I'll be even more suicidal:

HOSTS how are seemers designed? Do they get assigned different random roles upon flip?

No more questions. We have Rosemary.

Keep inserting Metal Gear quotes ad infinitum, as if I was clueless the first time you did it.

They were never meant for you specifically.

But it seems that people are rather slow on the draw. So I'm about done here.

Kill me whenever you see fit.

Golden 2 wrote:

Sig 2 wrote:You waited util the end, you easily could have asked the hosts in PM if a "blown" vote could be changed in thread. You EASILY could have known Roxy would say no before doing it.

A seemer is RANDOMLY assigned a different role upon death. The level of coincidence here is astounding.

I mean, go ahead and make your case to the others, but I'm not buying it.

I voted at the end of the period in which I managed to do reads on players and decide on a vote. It's clear on paper. The only question I addressed the Hosts was in the open, right after I blew the vote, you're the one easily adding "coulda/woulda" to what happened. I wanted to correct my vote on "BR", if possible, as soon as possible, I didn't act like slipping Jimmy.

How do you know seemers are randomly assigned in this setup? Did you clarify this with the Hosts first?

Here, I'll be even more suicidal:

HOSTS how are seemers designed? Do they get assigned different random roles upon flip?

No more questions. We have Rosemary.

Golden 2 wrote:I've done everything to lynch "BR" except fucking up the button press. Tell me who that's anything but idiotic, if I'm the seemer, aware of "BR" being genuine.

I was a North American Fall Webworm in my former life. Those were the good old days........


What were you in your former life?

Golden 2 wrote:I know I'm solid, so I'm calling wolf on her. This doesn't mean, given the closed setup, that other transformations might not be at hand.

Even my patience has it's limits. I just cant leave this thing up to you any longer. I'll do the fighting. You can just go home.

I do believe that it is also time my contingency plan went into full effect. I cannot fully predict the future, but I can only hope people are smart enough to figure it out.

La Li Lu Le Lo.

La Li Lu Le Lo.

La Li Lu Le Lo.

I am a little behind on current posts, but I did just see this for the first time.

Dom 2 wrote:boo 2

boo's first suspicion. Boo calls out Gamer Guy's post suggesting what roles are around. The problem that I have with this suspicion is that it is also a way to stifle discussion. It is an original suspicion, but it is one that dissuades a player from discussing a certain topic. Gamer Guy flipping civ doesn't help either.

One thing I cannot stand for is when somebody misconstrues and twists my thoughts and meanings to fit their own agendas. It pisses me off greatly. So congratulations. You have my undivided attention for the remainder of the game.

Do not misunderstand me, Dom. As I've said before in response to Golden, I am very straight forward, and I dislike cutting corners. If I wanted to stifle discussion or a specific topic, I would do so with a concise "Shut the fuck up." and that would be the end of it.

If someone thinks my analysis of their posts is reason enough to stop talking about something, then they really do have something to hide. As a civilian, one should not stray from discussion of any sort regardless of scrutiny or suspicion, unless that suspicion is well founded and correctly calling out your bullshit. If it is not well founded, you should continue unhindered as such responses should be worthless in your eyes and not able to shake you. But if a simple response has you quaking in your boots, you should reevaluate how you play the game.

It was not my intention to make Gamer Guy 2 shut up with my response to him. It was a read of what I assumed were the true intentions behind his posts, which unfortunately turned out to be wrong.

And the whole "This person flipped civ so that looks bad for this person." shit that happens around here all the time is baseless garbage. I am sorry. I shouldnt have called out Gamer Guy 2 because I very clearly knew he was civilian prior to my post correct? It's not like I had any way of knowing. That line of thinking has largely proven to be inaccurate and unreliable on multiple occurrences, and I suggest you step up your game in the future. If anything, most of the time the person who brings up that point knows more than the average player.

Despite Gamer Guy 2 flipping civilian, I still stand by my opinion. His speaking of possible roles was not beneficial to civilians. End of discussion. Not knowing our own roles is it's own advantage. "The enemy cannot predict you, if you yourself do not know what you are going to do.

Golden 2 wrote:

boo 2 wrote:

Golden 2 wrote:

boo 2 wrote:

Golden 2 wrote:
Nice to see that you both would like me to die again.

It's not that I want you to die. It's that I was expecting you to die.

That line kinda reminds me of 007 movies. "You expect me to talk?" "No, Mr.Bond. I expect you to die!"

You do know the villain says that, right?

Yeah I totally forgot that it was a VILLAIN trying to kill Bond in a 007 movie.

Good thing paraphrasing that line doesn't also make you a villain trying to kill me.

Well I mean I've never actually seen the movie. I've just seen that scene a bunch of times in youtube videos, or referenced in other media. Good guy in a tux strapped to a table, death laser heading for his junk etc, etc.

Besides, if I were a villain trying to kill you, this conversation wouldnt be happening. I just wouldve killed you last night. I like to keep my games clean cut and simple.

I wonder who else caught on to that thing I'm doing.

Golden 2 wrote:

boo 2 wrote:

Golden 2 wrote:
Nice to see that you both would like me to die again.

It's not that I want you to die. It's that I was expecting you to die.

That line kinda reminds me of 007 movies. "You expect me to talk?" "No, Mr.Bond. I expect you to die!"

You do know the villain says that, right?

Yeah I totally forgot that it was a VILLAIN trying to kill Bond in a 007 movie.

Golden 2 wrote:
Nice to see that you both would like me to die again.

It's not that I want you to die. It's that I was expecting you to die.

That line kinda reminds me of 007 movies. "You expect me to talk?" "No, Mr.Bond. I expect you to die!"

Ricochet 2 wrote:

boo 2 wrote:What is a "Seemer"? That is not a role I am familiar with.

A seemer is a member of the mafia who seems to be civilian (for example, when lynched or when checked by a cop)

Interesting. Thank you.

What is a "Seemer"? That is not a role I am familiar with.

"The Silly Person" eh? Is that a reference to a past game perhaps? Or possibly something else?

I was expecting mafia to double down on killing Golden 2 since the medic is already dead. After all Golden has already been outed as the Tracker, which can be a bad time for mafia. He is also a confirmed civ now. Gonna have to think about that one for awhile.

But more importantly, why did the Tracker have a resurrection ability? Those two normally are not in tandem. Something about this has bugged me since I first read it, and the feeling is only getting worse.

I wonder if mafia have some kind of "fake night kill" ability. It certainly wouldnt be the first time I have witnessed such a thing.

Dom 2 wrote:boo I have slight baddie read on. I don't like his initial case on Gamer Guy. I also don't like that he made the statement "I have thoughts but nothing concrete" and did not expound on them, but committed a vote to Synonym instead.

Oh you mean the case that I really didnt even pursue? I wasn't trying to convince people to vote for him. Yet. I was just following my own gut feeling on him at that point in time. So make no mistake. I was not making a "case" with which the rest of you could have reasonably formed a vote with. I was merely playing my own game. Much like I still am now.

If only people knew who I actually was. I wouldnt need to explain myself.

And when I say I dont have anything concrete, it usually means that I am watching for certain things, but what I have at the moment isnt worth sharing. When I do have something I feel is worth sharing, you will know. Much like when I expressed opinions on Gamer Guy 2.

I'm sure somewhere in Australia, actual Synonym is contemplating mass Koala genocide over his doppleganger.

I have ideas, but nothing concrete. So I will just contribute to ridding this game of Synonym 2 so we can concentrate on more fruitful, future endeavors on later days.

So does golden have some kind of curse where he can only talk with images?

Day 3 with a single player having died. I can't help but feel like this game is going nowhere fast. I wonder if I can slow down day phase by eating raw molasses.

Synonym 2 I would strongly advise that you quit acting like a child.

Actually there are some kids that play mafia on this site. And they have more composure than you.

You're embarrassing yourself.

Synonym 2 wrote:
And when people tell me I'm having an attitude when I'm not having attitude, that is when I start to get a fucking attitude.

Problem with this statement is that you actually do have an attitude. If you dont think you do, then perhaps you should check your tone, and maybe read what you write before you commit to posting it. Because it sure as fuck comes across like you do.

Synonym 2 wrote:Nobody lynched me?

And Scum Con survived again?

Gonna be Day 1 again on Day 3 if no kill happens?

Lol k.

I would struggle to call the day after somebody dodges a lynch and the medic dies in their place, day 1. It is anything other than that.