The Syndicate

Prisoner 509378 wrote:Golden wasn't the Warden. :P

I wasn't G or Mac either. :P

Good luck homie50 and civs. I sincerely mean that. My exit was not my choice, it seems, but... truth be told, I would have exited, if it were. Mmm, I sure love me some win grab on my toast.

Nevertheless, I thank homie50 for he-knows-what, wishing him the best in assisting the civs further, and the Hosts for a cool experience.

WEEEEEEEEEE!!!!

Lynch Golden the Warden and maybe the entire prison establishment will then crumble.

indiglo wrote:

Prisoner 740359 wrote:

indiglo wrote:

Prisoner 740359 wrote:Did the other Night phases have any polls?

The last one that had a poll was identifying a quote. The next day, you all came out.

Ah, lol, it was probably our "ask the audience" lifeline.

Really? Interesting. Our quote was "wtf-ika what are you doing?" or something similar. It was said by SW!

I wonder if we got the same quote you got.

Yes, we send it to you for evaluation.

Ironically, we afterwards didn't care that 9 people pointed us in the right direction, because some other homie had vouched that Silver said a different thing and barely reached the quota in order to win the challenge and break free. D'oh.

Epignosis wrote:Changing my vote to 10538.

Probably a reference I don't get, but what?

indiglo wrote:

Prisoner 740359 wrote:Did the other Night phases have any polls?

The last one that had a poll was identifying a quote. The next day, you all came out.

Ah, lol, it was probably our "ask the audience" lifeline.

Roight, well, that's about all I can manage, at this point. I wish I'd had more time. I wish I'd have been granted more time.

Good luck homie50, see you back in the pit, mates. May we see the light someday again.

MONGOOSE

RADICALFUZZ: nothing

TURNIP HEAD (voted Day 1): vote trade with Turnip (votes him without reason, asks for the favor to be returned)

DIINY (lynched Day 1): nothing

DRACONUS

DRACONUS (voted Day 4): self-voted
DRAGON D. LUFFY (voted Day 5): feels good about him in Fuzz context; agrees with case on him

LONG CON (lynched Day 3): no activity even
GLEAM (lynched Day 4): nothing

Mongoose's participation sank completely and I don't feel there is anything to interpret out of this. If she'd be still in the game right now, with just as much non-activity (due to RL, I take it), you 'd literally have to gamble with considering her a lurk cop. Not sure I'd go there.

As for Draconus, on his own, I can sort of see how his Day 5 vote is bandwagony. Certainly not the prettiest vote of the bunch. I'd say 50-50 on his being town or not, based on this move. It could go both ways, I don't think it's outside his nature to tag along vote (especially when not playing much), but he could also do it without bothering much about how he'd look.

So eyeball Draco for Day 5 if you feel like it, but I'd say find stronger cases and monitor his moves further.

Matt wrote:Some of you 509 voters should move to 740 in case we get two parolees. Even 509 voted for 740, what up peeps?

Not sure I want your endorsement, though, Bernie.

CHAINDEATH

RADICALFUZZ: post-factum mentions being totally in the unknown about the reason why this wagon was going on

LONG CON (voted Day 1): votes him for "feeling off"
DRAGON D. LUFFY (voted Day 2, Day 5): reasoning where?
NEROLUNAR (voted Day 3): "suspect"
MATT 2.0 (voted Day 5): Matt 2.0

DIINY (lynched Day 1): nothing
LONG CON (lynched Day 3): nothing on that Day
GLEAM (lynched Day 4): nothing

As cryptic as a whale's song. His fairly weaksauce reasoned votes, mixed with staying out of touch with the main lynches (whether good or tragic) for the past four cycles certainly raises my eyebrow. Then my other eyebrow. Then I just wiggle one eyebrow and then the next, up and down, because this suddenly feels very good. Wiggle wiggle wiggle.

Purely based on gut and surely-scum-wouldn't-be-that-bad-at-keeping-appearances-in-any-way, I probably wouldn't put him on the priority list, but these are shitty stats nonetheless.

ENRIQUE

RADICALFUZZ: Day 2, votes Fuzz for "no reason". Changes his mind and severly questions the CFD wagon. What the fuck is this?

DIINY (voted Day 1): votes Diiny for his votes and vagueness of actions
IKA (voted Day 2): inquries him on being bad. Changes vote to ika as protest to the RadicalFuzz wagon.

DIINY (lynched Day 1): contributed see above

BOOMSLANG

GOLDEN (voted Day 3): legacy from Enrique
IKA (voted Day 5): votes him out of gut and for his posts being too defensive or passive-aggressive

LONG CON (lynched Day 3): no reaction
GLEAM (lynched Day 4): no activity and no reaction

This is a very dry recap of his/their actions, but I still feel his Day 2 attitude was pretty much "no. stahp. don't do this shit" at RadicalFuzz being CFD'd. Granted, I cannot 100% say that Enrique is the scumster we're looking for in the Fuzz equation or that he won't rather suffer the same fate as Long Con and Dragon D. Luffy so far. But overall Enrique has played the game with a pretty cheeky, aggressive attitude, throwing solid darts at the players who got mislynched (Diiny), but backtracking on cops that got caught. Add lurk meister Boomslang to basically sailing the previous three Days and you can count Boomrique as a lynch contender going into Day 6.

oh hey I guess you homies are busy fighting

BLACK ROCK

RADICALFUZZ: No mention until post-factum. Agrees Night 2 with Golden's assessment of RadicalFuzz voters.

TURNIP HEAD (voted Days 1-3): Votes him for being... "forgettable"...? Votes him Day 3 for distracting the thread and trying to pile the thread on Long Con. Votes him at first Day 4.
QUIN (voted Day 5): Day 3 doesn't know how to read him. Then suddenly agrees with Scotty on Quin, pinged by his posts. ??? Adds him saying unnecessary stuff to the list. Then goes back to having nothing solid on him. Day 4, votes Quin for looking worse than sig. Day 5 repeats.

DIINY (lynched D1): nothing
LONG CON (lycnhed D3): read him civ, defended him, called his lynched easy
GLEAM (lynched D4): Day 2 doesn't understand votes on him.



Contrary to homie50, I don't get any read out of her saying "yes I agree" to people who assessed Day 2 voters after the deed was done. I'm also going to place her defense of Long Con into camp "it can mean anything", if the seemer talk regarding Long Con's flip is viable. Her choices for votes are either bit tunnely, but with occasional reasoning to it (Turnip Head) or wishy-washy (Quin). No mislynches or sidings with the lynches gone wrong.

ZEBRA

RADICALFUZZ: Neutral on him Day 2, calls votes on him disingenuous at least

EPIGNOSIS (voted Day 1-2): Nothing on Day 1? Suddenly reads him bad and wants him lynched Day 2. Intense lobbying for this lynch. Keeps him as a red read. Day 4 exchanges on why she keeps suspecting him.
LONG CON (voted Day 3): Nothing on LC, then suddenly wants him lynched D3. Says that others have made a case on him in her place.
IKA (voted Days 4-5): Defends him Day 2. Day 4 suddenly bottom red! Calls his posts disingenuous. Calls her read gut.

DIINY (lynched D1): nothing
LONG CON (lycnhed D3): contributed, see above
GLEAM (lynched D4): defends him Day 1; greenreads him Day 4; barks at Sloonei voting Gleam

I don't understand much of this. She's been a bit neutral, then a bit critical at the RadicalFuzz counterwagon. All her suspicions have suddenly popped out around the phase she wanted them lynched. Her stance on ika took the most dramatic U-turn. Apart from mislynching Long Con, she ended up on the safe side of contributing to others' bad lynch. Should Zebra's game concern us? Is it to be expected of her to be so sudden with her casemaking?

Did the other Night phases have any polls?

Prisoner 509378 wrote:

Prisoner 740359 wrote:I don't believe someone answered why ika is a cop, based on the fact that he survived a lynch Day 2 by way of an entire new lynch being created in the last hour of the phase. CFD on scum to save teamie? Can anyone explain?

If the CFD was primarily town-orchestrated then it has no bearing on whether ika is bad.

A town-orchestrated big-sized CFD that countered ika's lynch, only for a fair-sized contingent to still want ika's lynch after that phase?

I don't believe someone answered why ika is a cop, based on the fact that he survived a lynch Day 2 by way of an entire new lynch being created in the last hour of the phase. CFD on scum to save teamie? Can anyone explain?

Golden wrote:

Prisoner 740359 wrote:Well, let's get this over it, voted homie50, because the gap is already insurmountable and he earned it and nobody likes me (except bloody Matt). I'll just go back to fight off the Warden from behind the bars.

I like you, 740 the coward.

Aww, Warden, com 'ere, you cheeky mate.

*hides knife behind the back*

Golden wrote:

Prisoner 740359 wrote:This is what the other nominees must have felt when they were up against Leo this year.

This is what the other nominees must have felt like when they were up against prisoner 509 for the Best Civilian award in the Slammers 2015 earlier this year.

No idea what you're talking about, because, again, you can get away with saying this, we'd get shot in the peen.

This is what the other nominees must have felt when they were up against Leo this year.

Well, let's get this over it, voted homie50, because the gap is already insurmountable and he earned it and nobody likes me (except bloody Matt). I'll just go back to fight off the Warden from behind the bars.

sig wrote:I dislike how Golden is trying to connect who which prisoner is. Isn't that killable?

Prisoner 509 seems like a good option. However, I need to think about this for a bit before casting a vote.

No, sig, we get shot in the face if we do it, but Golden the Warden gets away with it.

sig wrote:

Sloonei wrote:

sig wrote:I dislike how Golden is trying to connect who which prisoner is. Isn't that killable?

Prisoner 509 seems like a good option. However, I need to think about this for a bit before casting a vote.

What's on your mind with regards to prisoners?

I'm not quite sure, about any of them. I assume they knew they'd be paroled which is why they got so involved. At least one of them is a mafia member potentially more. I like what I saw of 509, and we need to vote for one, but I dislike this whole process can't help but think it will go poorly for the civs.

@hosts why did the breakout happen this phase? Was this triggered by something or is it a mafia abilty.

If homie50 gets paroled, I think it will overall go quite well for the civs (except if he keeps leading mislynches, I suppose ).

Quin wrote:

Prisoner 740359 wrote:Welp, looks like we might as well end this voting process in the next hour...

If there's anything I can pledge to do for the parole, name it. Name iiiiit.

Can you give me an ISO of all the players you most definitely think are scum?

"Definitely" is a strong word in mafia. As for who I think, yeah, I suppose I could do Boomrique and a few others. I haven't judged things outside of the End of Day 2 affair. Doing so would invariably lead to ISOs in general being required. With just 24 hours at my disposal, I can't make any earthly promise of that.

Welp, looks like we might as well end this voting process in the next hour...

If there's anything I can pledge to do for the parole, name it. Name iiiiit.

indiglo wrote:

Quin wrote:

indiglo wrote:

Quin wrote:

Golden wrote:Time for me to abandon you all and write a sermon.

I wish I could say the same thing. I got stuff to do, but I'm not going to do it.

That's the spirit!

It's only 1000 words and I have nearly all of the information but I have no motivation to just put it together

I often find I lack motivation to do the things.

I'm often supposed to gather the motivation to do RL stuff, but then mafia happens.

If it doesn't come down to me vs. him, I'll vote for homie50 fo sho.

Quin wrote:Homie until proven hoe?

Rude.

Thanks for the support, homie50.

Prisoner 509378 wrote:

Prisoner 509378 wrote:I also think 740359 deserves recognition for the effort he put forth. I may not agree with his perspective of the Warden, but I am happy that he did what he could to put forth a case that he believed in and engage numerous discussions.

linki: lol well how about that

Sorry if the gender pronouns are wrong here.

All homies are homies, until proven otherwise.

Golden wrote:OMFG is it possible 740 is actually G-Man...?

"Golden the Coward"
"Golden the Warden"

If so, I can't believe I've missed it this long.

Still think its Mac though, on balance.

Would you say that changes things a LOT for ye?

S~V~S wrote:It isn't either of them

Now stop ha ha

???

Sloonei wrote:

Quin wrote:

Prisoner 740359 wrote:

Quin wrote:

Prisoner 740359 wrote:Name your price, players. I have proposed more than DDL as a suspect and, apart from Golden the Warden, I don't believe any of you have any real reasons to dislike me.

Name what I'd take for me to not have to go back and solve the Warden's stinking puzzles.

six oranges

uhm meaning what.

I want six oranges. And not the cheap kind.

Is this good enough for you?

Some of those look rather moldy.

linki: oooh 80s. Wasn't born then.

linki:

Prisoner 509378 wrote:If you parole me, I pledge to give the best effort that I can give. It may not always be as fervent as Day 5 was, depending upon time constraints, but I will do what I can to help as often as I can do it.

I'm not going to build a big campaign to promote myself. I've shown what I am willing to do for the civilian cause and that's really all I can do. I wasn't the only contributing prisoner and I respect whatever decision y'all make.

Can you make a big campaign to promote me, then? Can I be your Veep to your PoTUS?

Quin wrote:

Prisoner 740359 wrote:

Quin wrote:

Prisoner 740359 wrote:Name your price, players. I have proposed more than DDL as a suspect and, apart from Golden the Warden, I don't believe any of you have any real reasons to dislike me.

Name what I'd take for me to not have to go back and solve the Warden's stinking puzzles.

six oranges

uhm meaning what.

I want six oranges. And not the cheap kind.

How can I get you six oranges in a virtual game? Am I in a Grimm fairy tale right now?

Quin wrote:

Prisoner 740359 wrote:Name your price, players. I have proposed more than DDL as a suspect and, apart from Golden the Warden, I don't believe any of you have any real reasons to dislike me.

Name what I'd take for me to not have to go back and solve the Warden's stinking puzzles.

six oranges

uhm meaning what.

Name your price, players. I have proposed more than DDL as a suspect and, apart from Golden the Warden, I don't believe any of you have any real reasons to dislike me.

Name what I'd take for me to not have to go back and solve the Warden's stinking puzzles.

[A dog who is so excited he is just peeing all over everything]: If Sockface thinks he has found a baddie, he will get really excited. Once in the game, he can activate this ability to gain triple vote power for a day.

lmao

If I'd get paroled, I can vouch to get 120% into this game. I'm no silly man to imagine anyone but homie50 will get it, but just saying. You should, in theory, give each prisoner a fair shot.

welp

You have 24 hours to vote on a prisoner to be paroled.

inb4 obvi guy gets it

Golden wrote:the warden?

za warudo?

Well now that the phase is concluding and nothing more can happen to me, I can reveal my biggest secret

I

AM

Golden wrote:Again, Matt 1.0, who we know was good.

Have you met Prisoner 920077?

Golden wrote:

Matt wrote:

indiglo wrote:

Silverwolf wrote:I'm disappointed in the dragon lynch.

As long as town keeps screwing themselves-most likely e scum's help, I have very little interest in posting on this game. Nobody listens to me anyway.

I am seriously all ears. I prefer having the most information I can to form an opinion.


Matt, can you provide any concrete reasons you feel Boomrique is for certain town?

Like I said, who here thinks Enrique would run away as a bad guy and get replaced? Show of hands.

Like I said, Enrique asked to be replaced right from the very start of the game...

Have you met Matt?

I'm already on Boomslang, in case you guys wanna move there. (Shaddap Matt)

linki: "Enrique would not run away from the game as a baddie, but the entire cop team would scorch their player by proposing a CFD". Woooooooooooooooooooooooo- *two hours later*

Matt wrote:New scum list...

Fuzz
ika
SVS
Golden
sloonei
Scotty or Silverwolf

lol. Buss Bear SVS.

there's still uhm 16 minutes to lynch Golden. Le'ts rally!!

Golden wrote:The theory that Matt 'slipped'.

@silverwolf - well, I mean, I have heard you defending DDL, but I haven't had any good sense as to why you think the case is bad.

Wow you bit hard into that joke, didn't you?

Golden wrote:

Prisoner 920077 wrote:

Golden wrote:@740 - in half the lynches so far, the runner up has been lynched.

Why beat Matt up over it?

Because he just moved Boomslang OUT of second place.

Now THAT is a good reason. But not the same thing as what 740 is going on about.

Huh?

Golden wrote:

Prisoner 740359 wrote:

Golden wrote:@740 - in half the lynches so far, the runner up has been lynched.

Why beat Matt up over it?

...

Couldn't you or him have explained this, like, 20 minutes ago? In all lynches so far, I have not been present.

SVS is the one who first mentioned making sure the person in second was a good lynch.
She also mentioned the 6 votes up for sale.

All in the same period you've been pushing your theory.

Anyone who knows me well knows I'm not the warden. There has been no value in me using my time and effort to try and get you to provide meaningful help, when all I get is claims I'm the warden.

SVS mentioning that isn't an inherent explanation of what could happen with the runner-up wagon.
Yes she did. Do they add up behind the screens, you mean? Still deserving of a thorough explanation in that case, I'm no mind guru.

Pushed what theory? Huh? Are you imagining things, the way Matt thought I was actually pushing for his lynch by confronting him?

S~V~S wrote:Oh. I guess we thought you had read the thread.

All 100 pages of it? Ech.

linki: good point.

Golden wrote:@740 - in half the lynches so far, the runner up has been lynched.

Why beat Matt up over it?

...

Couldn't you or him have explained this, like, 20 minutes ago? In all lynches so far, I have not been present.