The Syndicate

Well, like Scruffy said yesterday, the Captain was oddly specific about Nixon. The Captain only mentioned afew people, so I'm guessin they're in cahoots.

Hmm... Scruffy has 1 final point that may help.

If the Devil risked and lost everything to save Zap, why would I leave my vote on a 3rd party. Scruffy don't think that'd be too wise. Let a teammate sacrifice himself on a chance to save a teammate? Nah, that don't make no sense. Scruffy thinks that the last bad guy tried to save Zap, but then threw thier teammate under the space bus seeing as there was no hope left.

Players that would do that would be the Lobster and Nixon.

-Sniffles- Scruffy don't believe this. I was wrong and now the whole company wants to off me? I believed in this company.

Scruffy was just a wrong vanilla janitor. Kill me if you must but nothing good will come out of it. I would like the other mason thingy to reveal and for the two to verify. If this doesn't happen, it's utpo whether you believe Hermes or not in a game where we may not even have Masons.

Scruffy thinks calling his votes baseless is also rude and inaccurate. The chewing rodent was suspicious and when I voted him, poor Scruffy was contested. I believe the response was "Scruffy actually enforced his suspicions with a vote, good". How does something like that change Scruffy's opinions? Thus the Chewing rodent had my vote twice.

After the Rodent helped kill and evil doer, Scruffy thought that he would look for something new. Remembering what the Captain had said, the Captain barely mentioned names outside of Amy, them Mafia goons, and Nixon. Why wouldn't I vote there?

Scruffy will be back in a moment. Need to go rince my wash bucket.

Yup and nope. Scruffy had no reason to change off the chewing rodent at the time.

Hmm... Captain only mentioned afew names... Nixon was amongst them.

Scruffy sees no reason to change his vote from yesterday.

Dr. Zoidberg wrote:I'm here, friends! Since nobody else seems to want to stick their head out and place a vote, why not Zoidberg? I'm planting a vote for Scruffy since I find the way he called out Nibbler for stirring discussion to be a bit unnecessary.

Hooray, I'm useful!

Hmm... Did I do that? No. It was not discussion stirring I called out, rather content. Did you hear what I had said about it, or did you paraphrase and come to the wrong conclusion?

[Chewing Rodent]

Robot Mafia wrote:

Scruffy wrote:

Nibbler wrote:

Robot Mafia wrote:
So you think it was this guy what says he's the godfather?

I do not. Whoever did this is likely to be incognito at this time.

As a Nibblonian with higher intellectual powers and the ability to disguise myself as cute and loveable, I have investigated the claim and found it faulty. I've seen this kind of thing before. It's meant to stir discussion and it has achieved it's objective.

Now, if you'll excuse me, the litter box awaits.

Hmmm... Scruffy thinks that the Chewing Rat is upto no good. Disguises be bad. Stiring discussion is good, but pointing it out an'leaving at that? Hmmmm...

Yo, I ain't never seen you here before. What sort of a problem do you have with this cuddly fuzzy rat?

I've never seen you here neither...

Tell me, what did that rodent gain from pointin that out?

Nibbler wrote:

Robot Mafia wrote:
So you think it was this guy what says he's the godfather?

I do not. Whoever did this is likely to be incognito at this time.

As a Nibblonian with higher intellectual powers and the ability to disguise myself as cute and loveable, I have investigated the claim and found it faulty. I've seen this kind of thing before. It's meant to stir discussion and it has achieved it's objective.

Now, if you'll excuse me, the litter box awaits.

Hmmm... Scruffy thinks that the Chewing Rat is upto no good. Disguises be bad. Stiring discussion is good, but pointing it out an'leaving at that? Hmmmm...

Yup, I'm here.