The Syndicate

Spooky Ghost

MovingPictures07 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 24, 2017 12:24 pm
The Soup Nazi wrote: ↑Tue Oct 24, 2017 12:23 pm Lucky.

(Sock password reset to nothing1.)
Yes, thanks Soupichet. Please reset your socks if you all don't mind, but if you don't I'll take care of it, so either way works.

I never reset my password hahahahahaha

Spooky Ghost

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Oct 24, 2017 12:22 pm DUNYA! I THOUGHT I BLEW IT! I WAS MISERABLE ALL MORNING. HOW DARE YOU.

[ALSO YOU'RE THE BEST HOORAY TOWN WOOHOO]

payback is sweet, and also "ye of little faith in dunia"

Spooky Ghost

thanks for the game everyone and MP for hosting my favorite show!

come on sloonei!!! start the next game. I need to play

Spooky Ghost

who was behind Leo? I'm curious.

Spooky Ghost

Spooky Ghost

Only for 1 day

Spooky Ghost

Spooky Ghost

The Soup Nazi wrote: ↑Tue Oct 24, 2017 8:36 am Shameful, if true.

Lynching the player with the least odds to turn mafia on Day 5 and leaving a PoE pool of three intact on judgement day.

Ya lahwy.

You served me soup!

Spooky Ghost

No I definitely meant baldness.

Spooky Ghost

Costanza baldness I mean.

Boldness I mean.

Spooky Ghost

Don't blame yourself too harshly Seinfeld. You didn't stand a chance against the Costanza charm.

Spooky Ghost

Not sure how much more of this I can take. Come on MP!

Spooky Ghost

I've seen a man who could change his face, the way that other men change their clothes.

Spoiler: show

Spooky Ghost

Spooky Ghost

Spooky Ghost

Hammer time.

Spooky Ghost

Jerry Seinfeld wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2017 8:33 pm And if George has been fudging this MYLO and playfully role playing around right in my face while I contribute to losing the game to him, that's cold blooded.

I'm cold, but not cold blooded.

Spooky Ghost

Spooky Ghost

Spooky Ghost

George needs a nap (sleep). I don't think Peterman or Leo are showing up any time soon.

Spooky Ghost

Waiting for Uncle Leo like

Spooky Ghost

If we lose this, this will literally be us:

Spooky Ghost

I'd be more than happy to hear from Peterman too in the interim if he so chooses to login and grace us with his arrogance.

Spooky Ghost

I am waiting for Leo to show up and offer his bit before casting a vote, though.

Spooky Ghost

Too loose, right? Time to lose Peterman.

Spooky Ghost

J Peterman wrote: ↑Wed Oct 18, 2017 6:43 pm George - George's outlier vote last round doesn't look so great. George also keeps saying he'll go back and look at players he's suspicious of, but doesn't. Except Uncle Leo, which honestly, I agree with a suspicion of Leo. But these outlier votes and this new agreement to "do what the town does" but not really doesn't look great. Not a fan.

Tim Whatley - Good Jackie vote last round. My issue at this point is that he keeps saying he voted me and is voting people for reactions, but I haven't seen much of what intel he's actually garnered from these so-called reactions. It makes me think he's just saying that to say something. Have I missed an explanation?

Uncle Leo - Uncle Leo, why don't you like me? I see you voted me because I haven't said much and I had a bad vote. Haven't we all had a bad vote? But what I do like about Leo is, he's not afraid to go after anyone, no matter how "cleared" they may appear.

So, from what I've gathered, I'm happiest to vote George, Whatley, or Frank today. And maybe Leo. But less likely Leo.

this post with all his intel, reads differently now that we know Whatley is scum.

He included Whatley as a suspect between 3 other of the bigger suspects itt. He agreed with my suspicion of Leo, but I'm guessing it's mostly because Leo was putting pressure on him and he didn't like it. I'm guessing, as he didn't give a reason. His blurb about Leo "not afraid to go after anyone, no matter how "cleared" they may appear" - I don't get that. When did Leo go after someone who was "cleared"?

Then he names me, Frank and Whatley as his top three suspects, casting a brief suspicion again towards Leo, despite speaking mostly positive things about him in his little blurb except for his suspicions against him. I don't like that. Reeks a bit. Jerry has been on my ass all game, but as a townie, I tried to explain why I'm not guilty of what he's seeing. I don't praise him for being confrontational then name him as a suspect without any other reasons given. That reeks something scummy to me.

Spooky Ghost

Jackie Chiles wrote: ↑Wed Oct 11, 2017 9:41 pm
J Peterman wrote: ↑Wed Oct 11, 2017 7:47 pmWho was it that made the comment about the Estelle and "villread"? I like it. Has experience, but is not using it.
Almost forgot about that one - if Mrs Costanza does have extensive Mafia experience, then she is certainly not attempting to use it.

The only interaction between Jackie and Peterman...

Spooky Ghost

It won't be very fruitful to see what Peterman had to say, but also reassessing what Whatley had to say about Peterman, he seems like the most likely suspect at this point.

Spooky Ghost

I feel better about Leo at this point after re-reading the interactions he had with Whatley and how Whatley reacted to Leo.

Spooky Ghost

But I'll go back and check over the Leo phase after that thing that made us all change our minds about him.

Spooky Ghost

I still feel if we add everything up, Peterman is the best case.

Spooky Ghost

I have unvoted. I want to see what MP will say. I don't want to be an accidental reason for an easy hammer (I just realized there's a hammer now)

Spooky Ghost

Jerry Seinfeld wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2017 5:11 pm
George Costanza wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2017 5:09 pm I saw Peterman's last post stating he'd be busy at a music festival over the weekend. If I was the last scum and I was anticipating a busy weekend where I had a target to submit, I'd more than likely send my kill to the mod ahead of time. Unless that would go against the rules and the scum is only allowed to send in the kill after the lynch is revealed? Is that what you're saying?

Let's ask!

@MovingPictures07, is it legal for mafia members or power roles to submit actions prior to a night phase if necessary?

further, and pending what MP says, is it possible for Peterman to have logged in quickly from his phone at any point during the night phase and simply sent in a name for the night kill without making an appearance itt?

Spooky Ghost

If the mod says we aren't allowed to submit night kills ahead of time...

Do we really want to go back to implicating Leo after all that was said and done? Do I really want to believe a scum leo would resort to emotional blackmail of sorts to get us off his back I don't know. I have no idea who is behind the sock and what s/he is capable of, but I kind of don't want to believe it (despite everything else screaming for a lynch of him before).

WHY AM I DOUBTING MYSELF SO MUCH.

I think we'd need clarification from the mod if night kills are allowed to be sent in ahead of time.

Spooky Ghost

I saw Peterman's last post stating he'd be busy at a music festival over the weekend. If I was the last scum and I was anticipating a busy weekend where I had a target to submit, I'd more than likely send my kill to the mod ahead of time. Unless that would go against the rules and the scum is only allowed to send in the kill after the lynch is revealed? Is that what you're saying?

Spooky Ghost

I am basing my Jerry read on how well he's played as Townie, and my early intuition, despite how shit he's made George Costanza's mafia life, and how helpful he's been and his outrage at my accusation of him possibly being the god father (including how much time he's dedicated to this game and slacking behind in real life obligations, total disgust at the implication he may be scum). I dig that. I felt it.

Spooky Ghost

I am basing my Leo read entirely on his possible lynch reaction. It was an outraged, appalled, upset townie. And he played with out emotions, and made us feel guilty. A scum wouldn't resort to that, I believe.

Spooky Ghost

I don't see a reason for a no lynch at this point.

Jerry and Leo are town.

Peterman has 17 posts. I'm not losing this game to him.

If Jerry is the last scum, despite everything then 1. I'll never, ever play with him again :P and 2. he deserves the win tbqh.

Possibly the most frustrating game I've ever played. I've never played with such a disconnected scum team!

Spooky Ghost

I'll be voting Peterman. Logically he's the last scum. I'm sure Steinbrenner is town, Leo and Jerry too. It's Peterman for sure.

Spooky Ghost

Spooky Ghost

If I'm alive, I'll be voting Peterman.

no doubt about it Jerry's "Also important" post reads very sincere. If he is lying to me, I'll retire mafia.

I just wanted to wind him up right now to give him a taste of his own medicne. SEE WHAT YOU PUT ME THROUGH EVERY DAY OF MY SEINFELD MAFIA LIFE JERRY?! George is petty. You know that.

Spooky Ghost

Yes I could have been more active, but I certainly read every single post in here before contributing.

Spooky Ghost

Sporadic? I've followed up and contributed every day. At which point in my posts did I come across misinformed?

Spooky Ghost

Up until a couple of hours ago, I had 4 votes against me as the last scum, yours included, Jerry. You didn't discredit me because of The Soup Nazi target. I like to think I'm an active participant here, though not in the several hundred posts category yet. Telling me you can't be scum because you wouldn't have killed Soup Nazi, because it's insulting to assume you would--well it's insulting to me too.

Spooky Ghost

Jerry Seinfeld wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2017 9:33 pm
George Costanza wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2017 9:24 pm
Jerry Seinfeld wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2017 9:16 pm
George Costanza wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2017 7:05 pm I don't care if I'm wrong about Peterman and he is the godfather. There is genuinely not enough content or even context through other mafiaers to warrant my total suspicion of him. He's going to be second or third on my list, following my look into Jerry (a brief one since I don't have much time, fuck a Saturday evening).
Do you think it makes sense for a suspect to be relegated to the bottom of the pile simply because they have the fewest posts (and thus the fewest opportunities to raise suspicion)?
Why Peterman and not you?
I can make the same assertion as prior, and it can be drawn as parallels from your own posts:

The Soup Nazi kill is made by a player who doesn't know what's going on. I know what's going on. I have had tabs on this thread at all times. To accuse me of making that kill is to accuse me of some elaborate scheme to solidify my "town credit" despite the fact that I already had a huge pile of town credit. This is a classic example of "but but you could have been... [insert tinfoil]. "Could" should mean much less than "would" or "should".

If I'm mafia, Elaine and Steinbrenner are both dead before Soup Nazi. Anything else is a poor decision.

Peterman hasn't known what's going on at any juncture of this game.

Following this reasoning, why would I have killed The Soup Nazi?

Spooky Ghost

Your second point is accurate but I took into consideration his absence from the thread and being out of touch on who is scummy according to the rest of us (like when he claimed everyone suspected the Soup Nazi then retracted it) so I didn't take it for granted that it cleared him.

Spooky Ghost

George Costanza wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2017 8:20 pm I'd like to know what the argument for Peterman and not Frank is from Big Stein.

I'd like a bullet point list of why Peterman from anyone. 3 reasons.

Spooky Ghost

Jerry Seinfeld wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2017 9:16 pm
George Costanza wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2017 7:05 pm I don't care if I'm wrong about Peterman and he is the godfather. There is genuinely not enough content or even context through other mafiaers to warrant my total suspicion of him. He's going to be second or third on my list, following my look into Jerry (a brief one since I don't have much time, fuck a Saturday evening).
Do you think it makes sense for a suspect to be relegated to the bottom of the pile simply because they have the fewest posts (and thus the fewest opportunities to raise suspicion)?

Why Peterman and not you?

Spooky Ghost

Jerry Seinfeld wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2017 9:07 pm (the most important thing is finding the bad guy, not wasting time fending off tinfoil...

Says the guy who has not gotten off my back since Day 1 before I even posted...

Spooky Ghost

Jerry Seinfeld wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2017 9:16 pm
George Costanza wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2017 7:05 pm I don't care if I'm wrong about Peterman and he is the godfather. There is genuinely not enough content or even context through other mafiaers to warrant my total suspicion of him. He's going to be second or third on my list, following my look into Jerry (a brief one since I don't have much time, fuck a Saturday evening).
Do you think it makes sense for a suspect to be relegated to the bottom of the pile simply because they have the fewest posts (and thus the fewest opportunities to raise suspicion)?

No. But when you have a top suspect with reasons (as I did Frank...reasons that made sense in my head), and when you're this close to being lynched, you're not really looking deeply into third and fourth level suspects.

I will reassess everyone.

Search found 174 matches