The Syndicate

boo 2 wrote:

Golden 2 wrote:rezz pls for crucial numerical civ support

Be a good boy and stay dead will ya?

You too!

Not up to me, though.

fingersplints wrote:

what the FUCK is this

Roxy wrote:

Someone wrote:I think Bass 2 is looking shady.

lmao

I'm "either the seemer or real TGG"? I thought you were certain of your judgement upon me, Dr. Pepper.

Com'on now, one more. Lol "Cookie" doesn't even give a fuck.

Cool. Added myself. Can we declare majority and move on?

Dom 2 wrote:

Golden 2 wrote:

Cobalt 2 wrote:

Golden 2 wrote:I'll be over at the bar again until regardless how many dusks and dawns it takes for this bullshit to be over.

I tracked "rey" doing something to me the Night I died and then tracked him again on Night 5, when it turned out he targeted me again. The first time I said he might be my killer, but the second time his shenanigans was clear. So last Day I voted him so quick out of grudge impulse. I didn't expect the Day to freaking end. However, to be frank, I still feel vindicated because of that miserable loss I suffered, after two human days of playing fair, considering I didn't stand a chance to earn his sympathy in the first place.

Tracking AND ending days early. Mississippi goddamn, you a powerful somebody. You ain't voted early one time before now. All of a sudden it's a grudge insteada making a case.

BOOL SHIT

Where the fuck did I say I ended the Day early? I said the complete opposite of that.

You ended the day late?

Yes, the opposite of "did" is "late".

Epignosis 2 wrote:We've got at least 3 mafia members dead. Three people mod killed, and then the Ninja recruiter (third party team/second mafia team) No from the looks of it we are still doing good. What I think your doing is fear mongering in an attempt to get the other players to vote elsewhere.

Also call me crazy, but if you saw Rey targeted you night 5 why didn't you lynch him Day 6 instead waiting until the very beginning of Day 7? In fact you never mentioned Rey once on Day 6 or Night 6 and being vindictive for about 72 hours seems like a long time.

1) Day 6 was "boo" vs "Cookie" in like not even half a day. I'm no vote waster.
2) I was expressing myself rather differently on Day 6, in case you didn't notice, I had neither time, nor patience, to conceive messages in which to mention my ping on "rey".
3) I mentioned my grudge with him on Night 6 as soon as it started and I could write normal again. Perhaps you missed it.

Yes, we've got 3 mafia members good, but are they from both factions, for a best-scenario case in which both factions are suffering, or is only one of the faction that's going down in flames, whilst the other is going strong. There's no fear mongering in such a projection, you've got to stay real with the odds. But again, I already invited everyone to go ahead to finish me already and get nothing out of this whatsoever.

Cobalt 2 wrote:

Golden 2 wrote:I'll be over at the bar again until regardless how many dusks and dawns it takes for this bullshit to be over.

I tracked "rey" doing something to me the Night I died and then tracked him again on Night 5, when it turned out he targeted me again. The first time I said he might be my killer, but the second time his shenanigans was clear. So last Day I voted him so quick out of grudge impulse. I didn't expect the Day to freaking end. However, to be frank, I still feel vindicated because of that miserable loss I suffered, after two human days of playing fair, considering I didn't stand a chance to earn his sympathy in the first place.

Tracking AND ending days early. Mississippi goddamn, you a powerful somebody. You ain't voted early one time before now. All of a sudden it's a grudge insteada making a case.

BOOL SHIT

Where the fuck did I say I ended the Day early? I said the complete opposite of that.

I'll be over at the bar again until regardless how many dusks and dawns it takes for this bullshit to be over.

I tracked "rey" doing something to me the Night I died and then tracked him again on Night 5, when it turned out he targeted me again. The first time I said he might be my killer, but the second time his shenanigans was clear. So last Day I voted him so quick out of grudge impulse. I didn't expect the Day to freaking end. However, to be frank, I still feel vindicated because of that miserable loss I suffered, after two human days of playing fair, considering I didn't stand a chance to earn his sympathy in the first place.

Lol you voted like two seconds into Day 8 and now preach me on patience?

Enjoy your loss if you're civ, gg if scum.

>quickly now
>nobody posts and votes anymore

Do you seriously want to drag this for 48 hours?

Quickly now, pour those votes in, it's not as if you have to worry about two potential bad factions out there or anything, with lylo looming. Lynch me to prove absolutely nothing.

Dom 2 wrote:Golden 2 gets my vote right now.

Maybe it'll work the second time.

RIP "rey". Thanks for the biased loss you awarded me.

Dom 2 wrote:

Roxy wrote:Day has ended post soonish
It is now Night 7 send in your Night Actions

Damn, I'm glad I got my vote in.

Mhmm.

Bass 2 wrote:"Civ tracker" my ass. "Andale!" he says, and poof! Night phase!

I think it's Spanish for "come at me bro".

Dom 2 wrote:And my vote has gone away.

I'm saved!

Dom 2 wrote:

Golden 2 wrote:

Bass 2 wrote:"Real TGG" should be "I"

You're going to eat those words.

Keep pegging, doctor. Saying "I" is called info dump.

Yup, you are a Syndicate regular alright. You even know the infodumping rules rather well.

You really want me to finally lose it, don't you? I've played here before! I can read some goddamn rules!

Bass 2 wrote:"Real TGG" should be "I"

You're going to eat those words.

Keep pegging, doctor. Saying "I" is called info dump.

Bass 2 wrote:Is this not boo's home site?

"boo" acted like TGG would shit all over the place like it's his home turf to mimic rough tough TGG. Real TGG never was so uncivil on Syndicate, ever.

Bass 2 wrote:

Golden 2 wrote:

Bass 2 wrote:Your case is that a Mafia Seemer walked the line of getting mod killed JUST to set you up for a lynch?

After Days of playing it safe and subtle? Sure, why not switch gears. Besides, it's also very easy to dupe you all by being so brazen and thus look like the real deal. But his fail is forgetting this isn't home turf, this is another forum. Check back my Mordechai game in Biblical (although that sock is now probably changed into one of the socks here, lol), if it pleases you, and see if you can trace any sign of me going overboard this much during it. I can play hard ball, but I'm still aware on which site I am and am aware of minimum etiquette.

"His" fail is forgetting this isn't home turf. How do you know who "he" is, if boo 2 was a seemer? If I recall correctly there are many female players on this site, so how do you know it's a "he" to begin with?

"boo" is male sock. "His".

Dom 2 wrote: Case 1:

Golden 2 wrote:linki @ "Lipsticklacey": lol what. I was being pedantic. Also, to further be pedantic, "Llama" is placed correctly as just Llama 2, but "TGG" is placed incorrectly as just Gamer Guy.

On Day 1, Golden comments on the location of a couple players' names in the poll. He points out that llama is placed incorrectly but alphabetically as Llama 2 (instead of the thellama73). But he follows up that "'TGG' is placed incorrectly as just Gamer guy". He is correct that if TGG was listed as ThatGamerGuy instead of GamerGuy, it would be alphabetically correct. However, if Golden 2 was the real GamerGuy, he would surely have remembered that his name is spelled XthAtGAm3RGuYX.

Are you fucking serious? I was commenting on the alphabetization of the sock accounts, not the real identities. Furthermore, as far as I remember, that was an exchange with "Lipstickstacey" (as you can clearly see) in which she got herself tangled in the confusing incorrect placements.

Bass 2 wrote:Your case is that a Mafia Seemer walked the line of getting mod killed JUST to set you up for a lynch?

After Days of playing it safe and subtle? Sure, why not switch gears. Besides, it's also very easy to dupe you all by being so brazen and thus look like the real deal. But his fail is forgetting this isn't home turf, this is another forum. Check back my Mordechai game in Biblical (although that sock is now probably changed into one of the socks here, lol), if it pleases you, and see if you can trace any sign of me going overboard this much during it. I can play hard ball, but I'm still aware on which site I am and am aware of minimum etiquette.

Lipsticklacey 2 wrote:

Golden 2 wrote:

Cookie 2 wrote:I usually know who killed me when i get killed. Not for a fact, but i have a good idea. One of the best things about coming back from the dead is that you bring your hindsight back with you.

I don't know how many times I had a facepalm moment after I had been NKed or otherwise done to death, "Of course, that's who killed me".

I was looking for that kind of insight. It was not nefearious or intended to entrap you, Scouts Honor

That's fine, I never implied your question was tricksworthy, I just operate differently (and believe most of the others do, too). If I'll have a good hunch about who might have killed me, I'd probably slip it in my case-making. In other words, my hindsight would turn into a subtle form of pursuing my killers, rather than speaking openly about who whacked me and why. Plus, I can't say I have the same spidey senses as you do, in general, or at least in this case there's really not much to draw from. Again, I believe I was likely put early on mute without any important breadcrumbs to leave behind, rather than being put later on mute for being on to something (except if I was already on to something regarding players such as "MM" or "Llama" ).

As someone who doesn't know GG, I have difficulty thinking it would be a good idea to be swayed by people who claim to, since we won't know if they're right or not since killing Golden 2 probably won't give us a different result the it did when he was NKed.

However, the post I quoted there was made at 9am. I also went over the real GG's post history, Golden 2's, and boo 2's. This post is the only one that seemed out of behavior to me, since the real GG tends to post in the evening, to sometimes, I am assuming for him, late into it, but I saw none from before 10 or 11am. boo 2 did not have any posts outside of what seems like the normal GG window.

So, I think that would back up the claims Bass 2 is making.

Wow, crazy stuff, inconceivable for sock play tactics to involve changing or adapting your post timing periods, to not make it obvious who you are.

Not particularly, "Dom". I've been suppressing my real self as much as possible, because of who I was given to play. It's no surprise players (especially those who know me, like "Bass") would expect me to still break character and flip out in normal mode, but it's tiresome to act the same way every time and get labeled as such. At this point, I'm just sick to my stomach of this whole seemer bullshit. "Bass" laid out the two scenarios, all each of you can do is judge yourselves. If you ask me, "boo" did a lot of pushing and poking to get to this point, over several Days, including his going overboard. If he were really TGG, I'd have expected him not to put up with any kind of subtle scheming, flip out right away and try to get me burned on the spot.

Bass 2 wrote:

Golden 2 wrote:

Bass 2 wrote:Golden 2, my questions are as follows:
3) In what context was the joke about "That Goofy Clown" made?

3) I commended you for it, as part of your sockplay, after you died. I made another comment, afterwards, towards you as "Bass", but it was off-topic and under my real account - so isolated from the game. The rest is in the fogs for me, after all this time. I'm sorry, but I tried to prove myself throughout the whole game, since this conflict started and I don't have anymore strength for that. You decide for yourself which one of us is the orchestrator. I responded to "boo" throwing darts at me as soon as he started.

You're the imposter.

For one, your entire tone is wrong here. TGG wouldn't be so politely complacent with people suspecting his identity. Second, you have no idea where "ThatGoofyClown" came from. It wasn't more than two months ago, and it was infuriating for TGG, so while he might not remember exactly who said it he most definitely remembers the event.

Golden 2 is a seemer and not the real TGG. Consider boo 2's response to backlash from his statement. Unless it was an elaborate setup to walk the line of being mod killed and act as TGG in anger, there is no benefit to intentionally drawing the ire of the mods and players. So we can assume only two possible scenarios. Real TGG said something, got reprimanded, and got mad. Fake seemer-TGG planned to say something offensive, hope he wouldn't be mod killed, and emulate TGG's anger.

Syn 2, you can back me up on the specific TGG brand of frustration. Remember when Jan joined JTM and that pleasant experience? Tell me that didn't sound exactly like boo 2.

I move that we lynch Golden 2 tomorrow. A seeker would still flip whatever they chose even after being rezzed, correct?

You do know "Syn" left the game, right?

Bass 2 wrote:Golden 2, my questions are as follows:
1) You hold the position that Black Rock 2 was a non-civ Seemer, correct?
2) You hold the position that boo 2 was a non-civ Seemer, correct?
3) In what context was the joke about "That Goofy Clown" made?

Also for the record, I attempt to be a very friendly individual. Friendly in the sense that if you don't actively want me to have a bad time I consider you a friend. My best friends so far are Cobalt 2, Lacey 2, and Metalmarsh 2. I'm going to go back through and look at Dom 2's posts to see if he's my friend or not.

1) Actually, not anymore. I tend to believe now that "BR" was a second civ tracker in the game and was simply startled by my flip, considering it contradictory and suspecting me for being a seemer. However, she still seeded hints against me the way I projected she did, I'm just not convinced anymore that she was bad in her intentions, just misguided (instantly assuming it's seemer shenanigans towards her own power). We can't really have a triangle of contradictory trackers. With her flipping, probably, her real identity, I'm inclined to take her out of this equation and consider her a genuine second tracker.

2) Correct.

3) I commended you for it, as part of your sockplay, after you died. I made another comment, afterwards, towards you as "Bass", but it was off-topic and under my real account - so isolated from the game. The rest is in the fogs for me, after all this time. I'm sorry, but I tried to prove myself throughout the whole game, since this conflict started and I don't have anymore strength for that. You decide for yourself which one of us is the orchestrator. I responded to "boo" throwing darts at me as soon as he started.

Dom 2 wrote:Goddamit, I think.

IKR

It seems I lost to boy bands and a llama prankster, so I'm quite depressed right now. Whoever was the arbitrer could have at least appreciated the fucking effort.

I'll be at the bar till dawn.

Such tomfuckery, I tell ya.

Bass 2 wrote:Would anyone dispute my knack for making friends? Golden 2, you're probably the only person who has an inkling of who I actually am, what say you?

Reywas 2 wrote:I have a new suspect and his name is

fingersplints wrote:It seems that one was too easy.

Metalmarsh 2 wrote:

Golden 2 wrote:

Roxy wrote:Trivia Time!
Who am I?

I joined The Syndicate Wed Feb 13, 2013 8:29:59 pm.
I have Hosted many games.
I am a well known member of the A.S.S.
My mustache is the envy of every man on the forum.

Roxy wrote:Trivia Time!
Who am I?

I joined The Syndicate Wed Feb 13, 2013 8:29:59 pm.
I have Hosted many games.
I am a well known member of the A.S.S.
My mustache is the envy of every man on the forum.

boo 2 wrote:

Reywas 2 wrote:Maybe he'll come to his senses and come back to the game

What so I can have pearl clutchers breathing down my neck with how they have a "better" sense of morals and ethics than I do?

Pass. Take that high horse business elsewhere. I hate it when people feel obligated to be offended on behalf of a person they know nothing about. It's fake as hell.

I'm not apologizing to anybody other than the person I made that joke about. I dont care what the rest of you think about me or what I said. I know how I meant it, and so does the other person. They had issues other than the joke itself. Attempting to actually play this would be far more trouble than it's worth.

So like I said earlier. I am reading the thread to determine who I should vote for until I die. I will very likely not be posting at all. Until then, for the sake of your own fragile little hearts and virgin eyes, you should probably just drop this before you all get tired of talking about it and whip yourselves up into a frenzy over something that has come and gone.

It ends here.

Continue playing like normal. Lest you make yourselves appear as children.

WOT

Lipsticklacey 2 wrote:

Golden 2 wrote:I don't follow. The Hosts have long clarified that the actions can be sent by anyone in the baddie team. Why would that action not count, simply because the player is inactive? It'd defeat the purpose of the team being allowed to send the action, in that player's absence.

It's true that, on other sites, the player still has to show up in BTSC and make a suggestion or have an opinion for the record, for the team to be validated to send it on his behalf. From what the Hosts said, this doesn't seem to be the case here.

linki - "TGG" was/is Wilgy.

I mean the action wouldn't count towards the player actually being active if they didn't send it in, because that isn't that player being active.

I was thinking of Wilgy 2.

Oh. Yes, that's true.

In that case, I believe "Blooper" was deemed active due to sending the Night actions herself, at least once if not on both occassions she posted during Nights. If she is civ or bad doesn't come out as a strong indicator from this, however. It's validated either way.

I don't follow. The Hosts have long clarified that the actions can be sent by anyone in the baddie team. Why would that action not count, simply because the player is inactive? It'd defeat the purpose of the team being allowed to send the action, in that player's absence.

It's true that, on other sites, the player still has to show up in BTSC and make a suggestion or have an opinion for the record, for the team to be validated to send it on his behalf. From what the Hosts said, this doesn't seem to be the case here.

linki - "TGG" was/is Wilgy.

"Lipsticklacey", I believe "Rey" made a comment on who "Blooper" might be and then "SVS" made an OT remark on why, if that happens to be true, a modkill on him would be "tough to swallow" for the Host, as she put it.

Two posts out of 4 by "Blooper" were during the Night, so her sending actions around that time as well isn't a farfetched concept, despite her otherwise apathetic and inactive gameplay and is out of modkill range, on its own. The dark flip side, of course, is that "Blooper" is bad and her team sent all the actions in her place.