The Syndicate

If it's soup, forget it.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Oct 24, 2017 12:24 pm

MovingPictures07 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 24, 2017 12:20 pm David Puddy -- Vanilla Civilian -- Elohcin had no idea
Elaine Benes -- Civilian 2-Shot Tracker -- Epignosis nailed it
Estelle Costanza -- Vanilla Civilian -- SpankGangsta had a sneaking suspicion, WELCOME and thank you for playing!
Frank Costanza -- Vanilla Civilian -- Boomslang had no idea
George Costanza -- Vanilla Civilian -- dunya nailed it
George Steinbrenner -- Civilian 2-Shot Cop -- Sloonei nailed it
Jerry Seinfeld -- Vanilla Civilian -- JaggedJimmyJay oh what a huge surprise
Kramer -- Vanilla Civilian -- Spacedaisy had no idea
Newman -- Vanilla Civilian -- NewTraditionalist had no idea
The Soup Nazi -- Vanilla Civilian -- Ricochet nailed it
Uncle Leo -- Vanilla Civilian -- somethingiwontforget had no idea, WELCOME to the site!

Mafia
J Peterman -- Mafia Godfather -- nijuukyugou had no idea
Jackie Chiles -- Vanilla Mafiaoso -- Long Con had no idea
Tim Whatley [replaced Kenny Bania] -- Vanilla Mafiaoso -- DrWilgy [replaced Dom] nailed both

No need to boast. I "nailed" your kingfuckmountaineering after, like, 3 posts.

Plus, Dom was supaobvious and Wilgy outderped himself.

Surprised who Elaine was, but don't remember who I had in mind. I had G-Man in mind for Yankeeman, probably due to sheer roleplay.

Lucky.

(Sock password reset to nothing1.)

George Costanza wrote: ↑Tue Oct 24, 2017 9:34 am

The Soup Nazi wrote: ↑Tue Oct 24, 2017 8:36 am Shameful, if true.

Lynching the player with the least odds to turn mafia on Day 5 and leaving a PoE pool of three intact on judgement day.

Ya lahwy.

You served me soup!

What are you talking about? You were the very first person I banned.

My reputation is intact.

Elaine Benes wrote: ↑Wed Oct 18, 2017 8:18 pm The "mention" feature is awful. Please stop using it.

[mention]Elaine Benes[/mention]

You can probably tell I wasn't around for EoD by the fact that I didn't even close my restaurant. I told that no good cousin of mine Hassan to take care of it!

I would have reacted to the events, otherwise. Though not sure how I feel about women having power, but hey, America! The 90s!

Of what? That she has not died?

George Steinbrenner wrote: ↑Sun Oct 15, 2017 2:12 pm

George Costanza wrote: ↑Sun Oct 15, 2017 2:06 pm

George Steinbrenner wrote: ↑Fri Oct 13, 2017 9:07 pm

Elaine Benes wrote: ↑Fri Oct 13, 2017 7:42 pm

George Steinbrenner wrote: ↑Fri Oct 13, 2017 12:28 pm What bothers me most about Elaine is that she roleclaimed in self-defense. Not strategically, not to protect another player, but to save her own skin. Her second claim tells me that the first was bogus! A civilian has plenty of cause to lie about their role in this game, that's for sure. But that first claim of hers does not sit well with Big Stein!

What if the second claim was bogus? I Bear Lee recall you saying anything about the first claim at the time.

HA HA HA HA HA HA

I had my qualms with it, young lady! It was an act of defense! I saw no strategic value in it whatsoever and that does not sit well with Big Stein. Why did the mafia not kill the exposed vigilante last night, Benes?

Was this ever answered by Elaine?

Most of my questions have not been answered this game.

Does an answer matter on this issue?

George Costanza wrote: ↑Sun Oct 15, 2017 2:10 pm

Jerry Seinfeld wrote: ↑Fri Oct 13, 2017 11:36 pm

George Steinbrenner wrote: ↑Fri Oct 13, 2017 11:25 pm You're a funny man, Seinfeld. Big Stein appreciates humor in dark times. But I will not stand for this kind of funny business, you hear me! Is this some sort of test? Trying to make Big Stein sweat, are we? You're gonna have to do better than that! I'll let it stand for now though. But come this time tomorrow I expect to see results on the table! Tell me what you want from and I'll have the entire Yankee organization at my back.

I'm a 2-shot tracker. Bania/Whatley did nothing on night 1. You killed Estelle on Night 2.

Is this a fake claim too?
Jesus.

I just TOLD you that!

My current vote inclinations are Leo, Jungleman and Little Man or Doctor Who as potential thirds. I'm also both considering Awful Woman and not, given her claims shenanigans. Leo's and Shrill Woman's votes are basically in So Bad I'm Cringing camp - with a percent they couldn't also be So Bad They're Probably Civs. Doctor Who trails with a unsharp game and the other two both have things that bugged me. The others are likely safe from my vote today, bearing no sudden moustache twitch. Tinfoil Yankeemogul.

And finally

Whoever this new guy is

Thinks Seinfeld is a troublemaker, Elaine hasn't contributed with anything and what's up with voters who stopped bothering me. Great questionnaire, much reasoning.
Tailing Seinfeld on a post by Mrs. Costanza.
What does this mean.
Don't understand any of his lines of inquiry here.
???
Retroactive prodding.
One intention to vote Benes, perhaps rooted (no pun intended) in his prodding of her, and one intention to vote Costanza Jr., not rooted in anything except asking him what's up.
Intention to vote Jungleman out of freaking nowhere.

Awfully fixated on votes stemming from two days ago already, currently with an unreasoned vote, no clarity on what he's looking at. Very poor job so far, if he's a citizen.

George Costanza wrote: ↑Sun Oct 15, 2017 1:53 pm

Elaine Benes wrote: ↑Fri Oct 13, 2017 8:00 pm The second claim was bogus. I didn't track Jerry. What if nothing I say is true? Don't even talk about grace, all right? I don't have grace, I don't want grace, I don't even say grace, okay?

I don't like this sort of impulsive craziness. I have a hard time pinpointing it down as scum--I hope--, but I wish we wouldn't make fake role claims and fake accusations based on those fake role claims like they were real.

Seinfeld did the same, claiming tracker and claiming Yankeeman disposed of your mother - probably to get back her season tickets and sell them at a better price than back in 1970, when she got them.

Lawyer Man

A lawyer who has not shown up for work. Disgraceful.

But, whatever, let's pick this back up, since he still have less posts than I have cousins.

Picking it up from

Dislikes baseless prodding, yet prods little man for lore. Hrmpf.
Decent pick on Costanza's baseless vote.
Vouches for Mrs. Costanza. Just like Steinbrenner!! What did I tell you?!
Dislikes Yankees mogul picking on nasty woman.
Decent rebuttal.

I disliked his early stuff, but don't have much on his recent bit. Worth a squint.

Now, that vouch for Mrs. Costanza does stick out, but heck, there are a few voices overall, included me, who didn't suspect her. Could a point in his favor that the mafia took this as a sign that Mrs. Costanza is a safe removal. (Buuuut *tinfoil activation*...)

Squirts rainbows on players' suspicion - trust ratio. Not a fan of this approach's reliability and I sense he went too hard on Benes' bitchin', when Costanza Sr. and Yankeeman had only a few more trusted marks. Agree with him on tinfoiling Costanza Jr's contribution.

Plot thickens, as someone points yet another vouching for a deceased citizen (Kramer). Could Lawman here be this much of a safe parking mobster?

Insists on Costanza Jr. looking worst for him.

I suspect this is a material for him to arrive today and plant a vote on Costanza Jr. and nothing else - if he'll arrive to vote at all! There's nothing else to draw upon other that the players he had good vibes on keep dying. I don't think I'll entertain the conspiracy around this too much today, though.

Yankeeman

Good poke at Jungleman casting suspicion on no shows without having showed much himself.
Inquiry on Jungleman's Junglewoman.
Jungleman and Poodie in his sights, could go either way.
Joins Seinfeld (what a surprise) back on Jungleman, claiming Poodie vote was partially in self-defense.
Suspects all Poodie voters, independent of their Poodie vote.
Keeps asking on Jungleman.
Still dissatisfied with Jungleman not being receptive.

His Day 3 posts already span 2 ISO pages, kill me and fry my head in vinegar.

I suppose this can look adequate. Nose itches a bit at his hard pivot from Poodie to Jungleman, trying to raise awareness and perhaps get others to look elsewhere - much like Seinfeld practiced his routine. It could go either way. I feel that's the whole thing, still, with this oligarch. Is he useful or is he acting useful?

Tinfoil candidate, but for today, I'd prefer to cook a mobster raw.

So... continuing my background check on customers and their votes:

Little Man

Felt good about Leo Night 1.
You know what, I for once agree with Comedian Hack that this post is kind of a salad of thoughts: agrees with Leo, Seinfeld downplaying something is haram, BUT it must have been ballsy, he did a deciding vote whereas mafia might have stayed away from, he claimed so he must be who he claimed, his lady friend also safe for doing the same... It could be words he'd want others to hear, more than a strong original input.
Doesn't like Leo's vote and tactic to keep ideas to himself. Aaand voted him.

So a 180 on Uncle Leo, huh. I don't technically disagree with Leo's vote, either, in fact I catalogued him as awful, but to quote this walking fat ball, his posts here also "reek" of a bit of putting content to look good and clinging on to someone's messy vote to pin a vote himself. Iffiness overall.

Jerry Seinfeld wrote: ↑Sun Oct 15, 2017 1:04 pm Soup Nazi, what is your present take on Peterman?

Has something changed since... you know, I had a take on him?

George Costanza wrote: ↑Sun Oct 15, 2017 12:41 pm
You know, I did think it was rather farfetched that all four main characters of the show (George, Seinfeld, Elaine and Kramer) would RANDOMLY be picked as town. Kramer was town, I'm town, pretty sure I have good feelings about Jerry...so Elaine, as someone who roleclaimed and wasn't night killed, what's your deal?

You must be hungry for some falafel, little man, yet this is just fallacious.

Jerry Seinfeld wrote: ↑Sun Oct 15, 2017 10:23 am

The Soup Nazi wrote: ↑Sun Oct 15, 2017 10:21 am

Jerry Seinfeld wrote: ↑Sun Oct 15, 2017 10:11 am

Jerry Seinfeld wrote: ↑Sun Oct 15, 2017 9:53 am

The Soup Nazi wrote: ↑Sun Oct 15, 2017 9:49 am Oh, so you just moved on your lady friend, after contesting my read on her, because reasons?

I felt like jumping ship on Peterman, and yanno she's there. Your grievance with her Puddy vote doesn't quite sell as well in my own head, but I did hate that wagon and she was on it. Indeed she was the only one on it still present at EOD when I was trying to steer away from it and she didn't acknowledge me.

All I'm reading is "I don't quite agree with what you dislike about here", "she was on the mislynch" (duh) and "she contradicted me".

She was the only one on the mislynch would could have moved her vote. I was yelling for a different lynch. She didn't acknowledge the conversation and stood pat. I don't like that.

If she would have had a stronger case on the guy, you would have basically asked her to drop that and comply with a different path.

Not saying she did (in fact, exactly the opposite), but what's the clear baddie side in her having rebuked you (besides that you're a terrible kisser; she talks behind your back all the time; the drunker, the more she blurts out)?

Moments ago you implied mafia would do better than this. Better than unreasoned voting / piling. Perhaps even better than sinking their teeth into an obvious citizen flip, despite popular demand to reconsider?

"Mafia could pull better moves in this game - but wait, if someone did something I didn't like, yeah, they prolly bad."

Ughhh

Jerry Seinfeld wrote: ↑Sun Oct 15, 2017 10:12 am "Flaking"

Stupid. "If you suspected someone you have to lynch them, otherwise you're a flake."

Great, winning mindset.

"If you bail out and steer clear on consecutive lynch piles during already a week of gameplay, you don't deserve any bit of eyeballing."

kay eff emm

Jerry Seinfeld wrote: ↑Sun Oct 15, 2017 10:11 am

Jerry Seinfeld wrote: ↑Sun Oct 15, 2017 9:53 am

The Soup Nazi wrote: ↑Sun Oct 15, 2017 9:49 am Oh, so you just moved on your lady friend, after contesting my read on her, because reasons?

I felt like jumping ship on Peterman, and yanno she's there. Your grievance with her Puddy vote doesn't quite sell as well in my own head, but I did hate that wagon and she was on it. Indeed she was the only one on it still present at EOD when I was trying to steer away from it and she didn't acknowledge me.

All I'm reading is "I don't quite agree with what you dislike about here", "she was on the mislynch" (duh) and "she contradicted me".

I wasn't pointing out vote switches. I was pointing out flaking from previous suspects.

But let's just tune in three-four hours from now, when you'll start berating people for piling on Jungleman.

I don't care how it helps you clear your head. Give me the reasoning for voting your lady friend, in full writing, right here.

linki: well, nevermind then.

I felt like jumping ship on Peterman...

Day 1 "So what's the deal with Puddy"

Day 2 "No, forget Puddy, so what's the deal with Peterman"

Day 3 "No, forget Peterman, so..."

Oh, so you just moved on your lady friend, after contesting my read on her, because reasons?

I wouldn't be surprised if one or two mobsters act on point, considering how the majority of players are still playing worse than headless chickens -
which means a good amount of civilians. Good luck using reverse psychology in your searches, if that's your flavor. On that note, Yankeeman? Still nothing but praise for that man? He's probably pouring money into your show, that's why. Those are dirty money, comedian.

They lynched Poodie with zero in-thread reasoning? Hello?!

Jungleman, detach yourself for a second from any factual observations on Seinfeld's vote behaviour and run me your scenario in which he's a mobster, despite his role claims shenanigans.

Ok, let us dissect the Pubby fiasco voters from yesterday.

Witch Woman

Indirect mention of Poodie while unsatisfied with Seinfeld's Day 1 picks.
Indirect mention of Poodie while still arguing with Seinfeld over his Day 1 vote switch (pissy that he didn't move to tie things up, instead of switching his one vote on Poodie to a fourth on Newman). Relevance?
Day 2, votes Poodie. Reason?
Unvotes.
Votes Poodie (for not offering her... pie...)
Unvotes.
Votes Poodie (for...)
Unvotes; nothing thus far in her head except for this idiotic switch game.
Suddenly vexed that Poodie made zero efforts to defend himself.
High demands from Poodie when she virtually did NOTHING during the Day except flick the switch on him.

Absolutely awful.

Senility Now

Defends my honor and lashes at Poodie for low content and tunneling.
Doubles down, votes Poodie.
Stays on Poodie.

If scum, he did enough to have content written out there. If citizen, ech, he just went with what he chose, I suppose.

Bear Shills

Poodie and four others have no suspicions, choose Newman out of those four.
Not pleased with Poodie's take on what posts of mine are suspicious or not.
Notices his work slave's constant votes on Poodie despite her Night 1 focusing having been against Jerry. Then proceeds to vote Poodie, acknowledging he said a bit on him, but not more than that.
Day 3, fingerpointing back at Seinfeld's wishy-washiness surrounding Poodie.

Don't understand how the dots connect in the third post here. Aside from irrelevant remarks on Awful Woman, his reasons to vote Puddy remain thin overall. I don't dislike the more recent stuff he said, but it's also not devoid of the possibility of clinging on to something to use in his defense.

Undecided on this shady (and stinky - always coming in my restaurant as if he'd played live Jumanji) character.

Uncle Who

Read Poodie fine?
Very mild rebuttal at Poodie suspecting him.
Then OMGUSes him.
Incomprehensible post-lynch analysis.

Awful.

Ranked by shamefulness:

Witch > Leo > Mowgli > Costanza

Seinfeld can do whatever he pleases, as long as he stays out of my restaurant.

Your ISO came out worst than my cousin Hamid's goulash,so why should I exonerate you just for being vocal. Explain your virtues, business fiend.

he*

George Steinbrenner wrote: ↑Sat Oct 14, 2017 12:16 pm Soup Nazi, what's this you're playing at? You've got beef with Seinfeld, spit it out! What don't you like about the events of the day, big boy? Who do you want to vote for?

I just don't like his jokes. Have you ever laughed at his jokes? Has anyone? I bet he pays his audience to laugh. And puts a laugh track in his show.

But we won't buy me, that's for sure.

Also, you.

I am. I'm selling soup. Get out!

NO SOUP FOR YOU! AGAIN!

Make that seven. Your uncle became invisible for a second, due to how irrelevant he's been.

Yes, a lead within six other people.

On Day 3.

Don't tell me what to do.

Jerry Seinfeld wrote: ↑Sat Oct 14, 2017 9:58 am

The Soup Nazi wrote: ↑Sat Oct 14, 2017 9:54 am So neither of you are trustworthy after all, with your bullsoup fake claims.

It's Day 3.

Stupendous.

You can't conceive of a reason to do that? Snore.

You've attracted nothing and the real ones seems to be surfing on the luck of going deep into this without relaying any information.

The mafia will clearly leave you all in this cauldron, maximizing the potential for us to be throwing knives at each other.

So neither of you are trustworthy after all, with your bullsoup fake claims.

It's Day 3.

Stupendous.

Did you track Yankeeman killing Mrs. Costanza? Yes or no.

Do you still feel Middle Age Mowgli is scum or are you about to downgrade him to a Puddy, just like with your "this suddenly doesn't feel right routine" yesterday? Yes or no.

Jerry Seinfeld wrote: ↑Sat Oct 14, 2017 9:22 am

The Soup Nazi wrote: ↑Sat Oct 14, 2017 8:30 am Seinfeld and his horrible, still alive female friend better explain their dicking around and make it snappy.

What dicking around?

Everything you've posted on this third day around the sun.

Seinfeld and his horrible, still alive female friend better explain their dicking around and make it snappy.

Because I say so.

I'm not wasting my time suspecting Hissy Veep for the time being. I have customers. We shall see.

George Steinbrenner wrote: ↑Fri Oct 13, 2017 12:52 am That's some fine work you're putting in, Seinfeld. There may be a season ticket package in the works for you. My people and I agree with your bottom two reads.

Allah help me, if either of you are scum, I will rage quit and move to Argentina. So much goddamn patting on the back.

You are not getting my recipes, Baseball Trump!

Jerry Seinfeld wrote: ↑Thu Oct 12, 2017 8:40 pm

The Soup Nazi wrote: ↑Thu Oct 12, 2017 8:39 pm

Jerry Seinfeld wrote: ↑Thu Oct 12, 2017 8:37 pm I like both Steinbrenner and Soup Nazi more than before. Solid civilian reads.

Insh'allah, I'm thrilled I moved from one guy who wasn't going to be lynched to another guy who wasn't going to be lynched and that suddenly makes me better in your eyes.

You're afraid to make judgment calls based upon the things people say. I'm not. I don't care about your vote.

What are you talking about. I made judgement calls on everybody today.