The Syndicate

Belshazzar wrote:Lazarus, you didn't even express any sort of anxiety regarding Horsemen before! What the hell is "Who do you think is more dangerous the heathens or the horsemen??" supposed to mean, isn't the civ win condition clear?

Lazarus wrote:No but with a horsemen named Death and War I feel like they arent going to be civvie friendly?

Yes, they're not trustworthy, but they're not primary lynch objectives for the civs either. So far we haven't lynched a Horsemen at all, let alone one to be revealed to have sided with the Heathens. All signs so far that seem to come from a Horseman have only appeared to show they're messing with us, at the very most. War perhaps makes certain players quarrel. Famine may take a very inactive player's soul - but mind you, this is totally uncofirmed speculation. Death seems to really not do its job, in case he has a name-related ability. Civvie-hurtful indeed.

Belshazzar wrote:

Jacob wrote:Okay I have to go now. I'm voting for Rebecca. I think either she or Mordecai could be bad but I've been less certain of Mordecai.

Jacob
In Topic
Search these results: Rebecca
Search found 1 match

My eyes couldn't roll further away in my skull right now.

Lazarus wrote:Wow bass really? Come on dude get it together.

Absalom I understand you might not be a heathen but you still could be a horsemen.

Do you need the Horsemen dead to win?

Deborah wrote:

Lazarus wrote:I think Pilate read my mind.

Had you meant to reply to his post?

Jephthah wrote:Not sure it is Balaam who thought of a way Job could be a civvie doing what he's doing, but as you can see, there are other players going that route. So we're either assuming wrongly, or maybe some players want us to think this is the reason for their vote.

linki: Okay Lazarus. Can you still mention other people you're suspicious of?

Jephthah wrote:

Lazarus wrote:I will be putting my vote on Absalom. Just the way he has been playing seems kinda shady since day one.

What will you do after Absalom is lynched (let's assume he does)

linki: Yeah

Belshazzar wrote:

Jephthah wrote:

Belshazzar wrote:Partially so, Jeph. Maybe "goes on for days" has a meaning to it. On the other hand, I also wondered in my big post what would stop both Job or Uzziah to focus on other things, suspects, etc. even if they're supposed to hate each other and push for each other's lynch. It doesn't sound like a plausible curse: "Bicker with X. Do nothing else."

No, it doesn't sound like a plausible curse.


Any thoughts on Lazarus? What do you think about his vote for Absalom last day?

I've heard "I'm voting X because nothing has changed my read on him" from plenty low posters besides him and I don't appreciate any of them for doing so. He has 13 posts, out of which half an altercation with Mordecai. He accused Absalom on basis of believing Cain was certainly silenced. Then retracted the certainty by saying he just "assumed" things. The accusation would normally be serious, but I think Lazarus rushed to conclusions and then sticked to it, whilst not making any more moves since. May want to lay low, or maybe it's nothing.

Mordecai wrote:

Lazarus wrote: Whelp I have more then 3 post its four now but thats beside the point. But its a lot a talk from you with no action because you didnt even vote. You better tell your heathen friends or horse to remind you next time.

Didn't forget to vote. I specifically chose not to. I don't vote for the sake of voting, and I never have. If I have no confident reads on the other players, I occasionally dont vote.

Breaking fourth wall here, now that I know who you actually are, I'll apologize to you properly after the game is over. I still would have pressed you like this even if I knew, but I may have been nicer about it. I get caught up in the moment sometimes. For the record I also will not reveal your identity to the rest of the players under any circumstance. That would be bad sportsmanship.

Mordecai wrote:

Lazarus wrote:

Mordecai wrote:

Lazarus wrote:Sorry for low participation but it hard for me to get into sock games. Anyways I will be voting Absalom because its uncivvie to vote and push a case on a silenced player.

I like that you do jack shit the whole two days we've been here, and that you always show up at the end of the day to explain your absence. Then today your excuse is "Low participation because I don't feel like playing even though I knew coming in this was a sock game.". Why did you even sign up?

I signed up just to piss people like you off. You have a whopping 18 post and you didn't even notice I didn't vote day one and I didn't even come in and explain why I wasn't there. I have been reading along and playing MY game sorry if you don't like how I play.

18 posts huh? Man that's low. At least 18 is higher than 3. Actually it's 19 now but that's besides the point.

Whenever your heathen friends tell you what your gameplay is like, make sure you come and share with everybody ok? I'm curious what "Sit around, dont say anything, and vote out of nowhere" style is actually capable of. I hear it's pretty effective.

Bathsheba wrote:I'll vote Cain because he's a possibility and he's getting lynched anyway, but I'm gonna keep an eye on Uzziah and Lot.

Mordecai wrote:

Lazarus wrote:Sorry for low participation but it hard for me to get into sock games. Anyways I will be voting Absalom because its uncivvie to vote and push a case on a silenced player.

I like that you do jack shit the whole two days we've been here, and that you always show up at the end of the day to explain your absence. Then today your excuse is "Low participation because I don't feel like playing even though I knew coming in this was a sock game.". Why did you even sign up?