The Syndicate

Matt wrote:I figured the theory itself was silly, but after watching the video, I was like "Hmmmmm"

Haha!

Never really understood the Jar Jar hate anyway. The biggest crime of the prequels is the Ani/Padme dialogue and Anakin screaming "yippee!" like three times during Phantom Menace. Oh, and midichlorians.

Anakin and Padme's entire relationship is so weird when you consider he was a small child when they first met. It's kinda creepy. Also he confesses to mass murder and she doesn't immediately run far far away. I think Anakin's entire storyline suffered the most from the bad writing that the prequels are plagued with. It could've been so much better really easily. The Cinema Sins videos actually do a good job of pointing this out IMO.

I think it's a fun theory to have. I don't necessarily believe it or consider it to be accurate, it's just funny. Personally I think Jar Jar is maliciously stupid both in-universe and as a character, but I don't think he's intentionally malicious.

Matt wrote:

Bullzeye wrote:

Matt wrote:Peace out Rox

What a fun game this was. When do you plan on creating the prequel trilogy, hosts?

I hate prequels. They're coarse, rough, irritating, and they get everywhere. Count me in for the sequel trilogy game in 2020 though after MP sells The Syndicate to Disney for squillions of dollars.

Squillions is officially my new favorite word!

Also, yes on prequel trilogy mafia. Make Jar Jar an unstoppable indy!

Darth Jar Jar ftw. I've always wanted to be an SK, this could be the one for me!

Matt wrote:Peace out Rox

What a fun game this was. When do you plan on creating the prequel trilogy, hosts?

I hate prequels. They're coarse, rough, irritating, and they get everywhere. Count me in for the sequel trilogy game in 2020 though after MP sells The Syndicate to Disney for squillions of dollars.

Never have I ever experienced such an infuriating lynch as my death in this game. Congratulations winners! I really enjoyed this game despite not having the time to play it, and I was mostly trying to not get noticed by the baddies so I could keep shutting them down unsuspected but I don't think I actually got very many of them. I know I targeted Zebra once but can't think if I was successful on anyone else.

Epignosis wrote:The next product on the Jawa line:

Death Star- Vaporizes an entire star system, killing 3 random players (Jawas are immune).

Please PM your bids to the hosts.

Can dead people bid? I've always wanted a Death Star of my very own.

DharmaHelper wrote:TFW you write a post with a lynchee in mind and some asshole ties it up

I know, right? So mean.

MacDougall wrote:

Bullzeye wrote:

Spacedaisy wrote:Self vote is a cop out quitters way, I voted bullz in self defense. Only two voters left anyway, bass and Elo.

How is it self defense to vote me when voting Elo would ensure it was impossible to lynch you, and she has more votes than either of us? I smell shenanigans.

Agreed. Elohcin also has a vote handy too, so Spacedaisy just handed her a coinflip with you. I was probably wrong about you and right about Elohcin and Spacedaisy. Bass seems to indicate he'd vote me but it'd be a wasted vote at this point and he has a horrible history of non voting in this game so ...

Bass if you end up voting, don't waste it.

I expect you'll find out quite soon just how wrong you were about me. If I die today, it will confirm Daisy as bad IMO after that vote. I will be really disappointed if I do go out in such a crappy way but I was never gonna survive all game. Elo will probably vote me to save herself at this point. If she does and really has had the tractor beam used on her then it's not hard to put two and two together in that regard...

Spacedaisy wrote:Self vote is a cop out quitters way, I voted bullz in self defense. Only two voters left anyway, bass and Elo.

How is it self defense to vote me when voting Elo would ensure it was impossible to lynch you, and she has more votes than either of us? I smell shenanigans.

a2thezebra wrote:rezz plz

'Kay

And now I can't save myself watch the remaining blendy baddies throw votes on me.

Linki: How did you guess?

MacDougall wrote:What post?

Forgive me but I don't accept "I've got other things to do" as a reason to consider you a civilian. That's the kind of non alignment indicative stuff that bad guys try to lean on to avoid being lynched. You know it's no excuse so why say it? Playing at the emotions. Playing at the agreement.

Wrap it up guys, we've got a bad guy here.

I'm not using it as an excuse for anything. You said I should've done something earlier in the day and I said it wasn't possible. Sorry if that's not good enough for you. I'm not 'playing at' anything.

This is the post in question:

Bullzeye wrote:

MacDougall wrote:Now rather than make rational arguments against his lynch. We get pearls like this...

Bullzeye wrote:I just hope your rousing speech doesn't inspire too many people to follow you and the self-confessed baddie down the path of insanity.

snip

MacDougall wrote:

Bullzeye wrote:I just hope your rousing speech doesn't inspire too many people to follow you and the self-confessed baddie down the path of insanity.

Convinced me.

Of course it did.

The discredit begins. We're all stupid for entertaining it now.

Bear in mind that the argument I'm "discrediting" is:

Matt wrote: Vote Bullz. He's always bad even when he isn't.

Mac is trying to look like Matt put together a reasonable argument and I responded by saying shut up you're stupid. This is not what happened. I have never called anyone stupid for believing anything (though if you do think Matt made a solid argument there, I'm not going to call you a genius) and the rolleyes was intended to depict my sarcasm since Mac obviously wasn't convinced by Matt and was probably planning to vote me for at least several hours.

I may as well *Vote Daisy* even though it will be of little consequence at this point.

MacDougall wrote:

Bullzeye wrote:

MacDougall wrote:

Bullzeye wrote:

MacDougall wrote:

Bullzeye wrote:I'm tempted, and it would be so funny since you seem so convinced... I'm not super interested in dying though yet.

Of course not. Now I'm "convinced" and what I'm doing is not a scum gambit. Lol.

I said seem. It's one or the other with the stuff you've been spewing out about me trying to discredit jokes.

So now all your posts are jokes. So were you joking about your defense too?

Bullzeye, who are your suspects. Come on man, you've spent so much energy defending yourself I've yet to see any hunting.

Matt if you genuinely think I am more scum than him, you need to stop smoking cones.

Who said my posts are jokes?

I've not spent any energy defending myself.

I listed a bunch of people who are probably bad the other day. I'm up for a Daisy lynch but absolutely nobody else seems to be despite the really obvious classic MP distancing tactics. Bubbles reeks of blendy baddie. You spent hours misrepresenting every single post I made during the Zebra lynch. I think Faraday's vote for Zebra was one of the shadiest vote explanations I've ever seen.

Sorry did I misunderstand you. I thought you said I was trying to discredit your jokes?

True, I guess you tapping on your keyboard while laying on the couch isn't exactly exerting energy, but that's nit picking.

I think many people would have been up for a Daisy lynch if you pushed it early enough for it to occur. Lots of people think she's bad, myself being one of them. I also agree on Bubbles, he's primary candidate for being the last Hutt imo. No I didn't, I read them and made a judgement based on my intuition ie was doing what a civilian does in a game of forums Mafia.

No, Matt made a post the other day that was clearly a joke and I made a sarcastic response. You then said I was calling people stupid for believing the case against me and trying to discredit it. Anyone not paying enough attention (ie half the game) could see that post and latch onto it despite it having been pure 100% premium grade BS and I'm pretty sure you know it.

I didn't get the chance to push anything early. Got other things to be getting on with half the time.

MacDougall wrote:

Bullzeye wrote:

MacDougall wrote:

Bullzeye wrote:I'm tempted, and it would be so funny since you seem so convinced... I'm not super interested in dying though yet.

Of course not. Now I'm "convinced" and what I'm doing is not a scum gambit. Lol.

I said seem. It's one or the other with the stuff you've been spewing out about me trying to discredit jokes.

So now all your posts are jokes. So were you joking about your defense too?

Bullzeye, who are your suspects. Come on man, you've spent so much energy defending yourself I've yet to see any hunting.

Matt if you genuinely think I am more scum than him, you need to stop smoking cones.

Who said my posts are jokes?

I've not spent any energy defending myself.

I listed a bunch of people who are probably bad the other day. I'm up for a Daisy lynch but absolutely nobody else seems to be despite the really obvious classic MP distancing tactics. Bubbles reeks of blendy baddie. You spent hours misrepresenting every single post I made during the Zebra lynch. I think Faraday's vote for Zebra was one of the shadiest vote explanations I've ever seen.

MacDougall wrote:

Bullzeye wrote:I'm tempted, and it would be so funny since you seem so convinced... I'm not super interested in dying though yet.

Of course not. Now I'm "convinced" and what I'm doing is not a scum gambit. Lol.

I said seem. It's one or the other with the stuff you've been spewing out about me trying to discredit jokes.

I'm tempted, and it would be so funny since you seem so convinced... I'm not super interested in dying though yet.

I will self vote if everyone promises to lynch you when I flip civ, Mac.

I've actually dropped my Elo suspicion ages ago and am not really interested in seeing us lynch her so I need a better option.

Matt wrote:You were forced to vote MP, you say? I don't think I believe you.

Also I have no idea if someone used that Jawa thingamabob on Elohcin but I have been denied every single thing I've tried to buy this game.

Linki - Bullz should we lynch Dom next?

I don't actually suspect Dom, and he pretty much exclusively comes after me when I'm civ, so really his suspicion of me is a point in my favour. I'm considering following your obviously forced vote though just to see what would happen.

MacDougall wrote:

Bullzeye wrote:

MacDougall wrote:

Bullzeye wrote:How is any of that a logical conclusion?

This post was made today after I made a post that said Bullzeye was scum.

Bullzeye wrote:

Dom wrote:I voted Bullzeye-- his defending of MP was blatant enough to make me think he might be trying to undo whatever effects of MP's bussing were.

What does this even mean? Besides, I hardly think it's accurate to say I defended MP. I just didn't think he was bad. I didn't try to encourage others not to vote for him nor explain why he definitely wasn't a baddie.

This post was made today after Dom voted Bullzeye.

The posts were exactly three hours apart. Yet where's Bullzeye looking for scum today? Nowhere. Two posts only and both were him taking the time to question suspicion on himself. No attempt to look for bad guys at all.

He's been spending those three hours doing something. He's not in the Pikmin game? So why's he around if he's not posting in this one looking for bad guys?

I spent those three hours staring at this website in particular waiting for my name to be mentioned again because I have literally nothing else to do with my life and am too bad at mafia to even pretend I have any suspects.

Again, that's not what I inferred.

2 for 2 on strawman.

Also you lost points for not using sarcastic font!

You have probably been watching porn or something no doubt, but you're probably sitting in your BTSC chatting away, reading the thread to figure out who the Hutt is.

1. I have little or no use for porn.

2. People should be smart enough to figure out when someone is being sarcastic without the use of orange text.

3. I have no btsc.

MacDougall wrote:

Bullzeye wrote:

MacDougall wrote:

Bullzeye wrote:I don't actually exist and am just a bot that shows up when my name is mentioned. Or perhaps my baddie friends told me in btsc that my name was mentioned and so I came in here to defend my honour. Because that's something that ever happens.

Lol. That's a giant leap. You don't have to be told by your friends in btsc that your name was mentioned to make what you did seem scum.

2 posts up until now in the day, both 100% defensive. Both questioning the rationality of the poster. No hunting. No analysis.

How are you civ exactly? What have you done to make you look civ? Specifically not Empire?

I haven't done anything to 'make me look civ' because civs don't care about looking civ. I've been in and out most of the day and it happens that the first/only things I responded to were people calling me bad based on poor reasoning.

I tend to find that civilians can at least call on things that make them look civilian when asked to because by virtue of being civilian they've done things that make them look like a civilian...

Also neither Dom's nor my reasons are poor reasoning, but good effort.

I think your reasons are poor because I know you're both wrong and don't even know what Dom means by his point. I don't know what exactly you expect me to say to prove I'm civ when you know full well I've been too busy to play most of this game and have hardly been here. Feel free to continue your bizarre crusade against me though.

MacDougall wrote:

Bullzeye wrote:I don't actually exist and am just a bot that shows up when my name is mentioned. Or perhaps my baddie friends told me in btsc that my name was mentioned and so I came in here to defend my honour. Because that's something that ever happens.

Lol. That's a giant leap. You don't have to be told by your friends in btsc that your name was mentioned to make what you did seem scum.

2 posts up until now in the day, both 100% defensive. Both questioning the rationality of the poster. No hunting. No analysis.

How are you civ exactly? What have you done to make you look civ? Specifically not Empire?

I haven't done anything to 'make me look civ' because civs don't care about looking civ. I've been in and out most of the day and it happens that the first/only things I responded to were people calling me bad based on poor reasoning.

MacDougall wrote:

Bullzeye wrote:How is any of that a logical conclusion?

This post was made today after I made a post that said Bullzeye was scum.

Bullzeye wrote:

Dom wrote:I voted Bullzeye-- his defending of MP was blatant enough to make me think he might be trying to undo whatever effects of MP's bussing were.

What does this even mean? Besides, I hardly think it's accurate to say I defended MP. I just didn't think he was bad. I didn't try to encourage others not to vote for him nor explain why he definitely wasn't a baddie.

This post was made today after Dom voted Bullzeye.

The posts were exactly three hours apart. Yet where's Bullzeye looking for scum today? Nowhere. Two posts only and both were him taking the time to question suspicion on himself. No attempt to look for bad guys at all.

He's been spending those three hours doing something. He's not in the Pikmin game? So why's he around if he's not posting in this one looking for bad guys?

I spent those three hours staring at this website in particular waiting for my name to be mentioned again because I have literally nothing else to do with my life and am too bad at mafia to even pretend I have any suspects.

I don't actually exist and am just a bot that shows up when my name is mentioned. Or perhaps my baddie friends told me in btsc that my name was mentioned and so I came in here to defend my honour. Because that's something that ever happens.

How is any of that a logical conclusion?

Dom wrote:I voted Bullzeye-- his defending of MP was blatant enough to make me think he might be trying to undo whatever effects of MP's bussing were.

What does this even mean? Besides, I hardly think it's accurate to say I defended MP. I just didn't think he was bad. I didn't try to encourage others not to vote for him nor explain why he definitely wasn't a baddie.

Spacedaisy wrote:

MacDougall wrote:Spacedaisy why do you think MP voted for you and Glorfindel and failed to achieve a lynch, three separate times? That's a bit strange for a scum to tunnel a civilian that badly wouldn't you agree? Looks HEEEEEEEEAPS like a sustained effort at distancing.

I would guess he believed I was a Hutt.

Or maybe he was doing what bad MP always does, and shoving a teammate under the bus. I'd be more surprised if there was a game where he didn't aggressively pursue a member of his own team tbh.

You being right or wrong had nothing to do with Zebra's lynch. She outed herself. It kinda feels like you're trying to take credit for a successful baddie lynch when you were completely uninvolved with it.

Yeah congratulations Bass that lynch was all down to you.

Rico have Cinema Sins paid you to shill for them? :P

Canucklehead wrote:

Bubbles wrote:

Bullzeye wrote:I see your unannounced vote there, Bubbles. There's no way you've been silenced.

i'm here, i've fallen a bit behind on the thread, added my vote to the one opposing the one dfaraday voted on basically :P and i'm pretty sure mac and matt are civs so i feel ok with voting the same as them

How do we feel about this?
Of all the people who didn't vote Z, I was very surprised to see Bubbles among them. If she had read even a teeny bit of the thread before voting (which, granted, doesn't seem to be a guarantee), she would have seen Z was an outed baddie. Bubbles seems like the LEAST likely person to vote away from a confirmed Hutt (she's relatively newish to mafia and therefore more likely to be traditionally minded, she doesn't usually go along with votes that are pushed by others just because they seem civ, she's usually risk averse, etc), so her hopping onto the Bullz votes just to avoid voting the same way was Faraday seems like absolute Bullsuit to me. I think she's our Crumb, and her lack of participation would explain the sporadic appearance of curses. (For the record, my curse had nothing to do with Crumb)
Thoughts?

The funniest thing to me is that Bubbles and Faraday had the shadiest votes of all IMO so the fact she used him as an excuse is an interesting coincidence. I definitely think she looks suspicious and it makes sense for her to be a Hutt.

MacDougall wrote:

Bullzeye wrote:Just in case there are weird unpredictable shenanigans and I do end up dead, I think I've left enough to show who I think should be lynched next. To summarise: Zebra, Mac, Faraday, Bubbles, Daisy, Canuck, Bass. In something possibly resembling that order. Obviously they can't all be bad but those are my suspects. Now I'm going to bed like I should have done 3 hours ago.

You are pulling names out of a hat. You complained about there being no case on you but now you just named 7 players who you seem to have decided were scum based on 45 minutes of play. You can't be serious.

We missed an Empire lynch here mein civilians.

Okay sure lynch me tomorrow then if I don't die today. Your case on me is the most blatant baddie push I've ever seen. It is full of misrepresentations and lies. You've never even addressed the fact that your claims I tried to discredit things were super flawed. Every time I respond to you you ignore the bulk of what I've said, get mad, and find a new thing to accuse me of. You are bad. I have also listed people whose votes were shady, blendy, and who don't have civ-friendly approaches to this game. There really is no case on me other than that I slightly defended MP because I thought he was civ. There is nothing Empire about me. Now I'm seriously going to bed.

Just in case there are weird unpredictable shenanigans and I do end up dead, I think I've left enough to show who I think should be lynched next. To summarise: Zebra, Mac, Faraday, Bubbles, Daisy, Canuck, Bass. In something possibly resembling that order. Obviously they can't all be bad but those are my suspects. Now I'm going to bed like I should have done 3 hours ago.

Epignosis wrote:
In the UK, you have the NHS. Do you have this Community Chest card?

I don't think so but I would have to check to be certain and that would require a 5 hour drive.

MacDougall wrote:

Bullzeye wrote:

MacDougall wrote:

Bullzeye wrote:

Russtifinko wrote:Hmmm...I'm tempted to vote Bullz because shenanigans. Also we can just lynch zebra tomorrow. Also I LOVE Canuck's posts today.

Go for it. It will be fun. A civ will die, but you'd make some people happy.

MacDougall wrote:

Bullzeye wrote: Linki - I didn't take anything out of context. It was at least 50% a joke too.

No, you exactly did take it out of context. Like dictionary definition did that.

Nope. Context is all still there and anyone who wants to check can do so. All I did was point out something that looked funny and you got mad. But that's okay. Looks like I'm surviving today anyway so we can do all this again tomorrow.

Congrats.

I just hope that I do get lynched so you can see you were wrong and put so much force and effort into being wrong.

How petulant of you. You'd be horrible to play Monopoly with.

I once sold all my properties to my brother for £1 because I owned a fair portion of the board but had no money and our dad was probably going to win if I didn't and he was gloating a lot. So yeah. Forced a stalemate where neither of them could win in the end.

MacDougall wrote:

Bullzeye wrote:

Russtifinko wrote:Hmmm...I'm tempted to vote Bullz because shenanigans. Also we can just lynch zebra tomorrow. Also I LOVE Canuck's posts today.

Go for it. It will be fun. A civ will die, but you'd make some people happy.

MacDougall wrote:

Bullzeye wrote: Linki - I didn't take anything out of context. It was at least 50% a joke too.

No, you exactly did take it out of context. Like dictionary definition did that.

Nope. Context is all still there and anyone who wants to check can do so. All I did was point out something that looked funny and you got mad. But that's okay. Looks like I'm surviving today anyway so we can do all this again tomorrow.

Congrats.

I just hope that I do get lynched so you can see you were wrong and put so much force and effort into being wrong.

Russtifinko wrote:Hmmm...I'm tempted to vote Bullz because shenanigans. Also we can just lynch zebra tomorrow. Also I LOVE Canuck's posts today.

Go for it. It will be fun. A civ will die, but you'd make some people happy.

MacDougall wrote:

Bullzeye wrote: Linki - I didn't take anything out of context. It was at least 50% a joke too.

No, you exactly did take it out of context. Like dictionary definition did that.

Nope. Context is all still there and anyone who wants to check can do so. All I did was point out something that looked funny and you got mad. But that's okay. Looks like I'm surviving today anyway so we can do all this again tomorrow.

nijuukyugou wrote:I get Mac's points about Bullzeye (it IS weird to first say lynch zebra, then not lynch zebra and look elsewhere, and flip-flop around like that)

Look. That isn't what I was doing. I said I personally do not think there is a better choice today than Zebra and do not think there is a good reason not to vote for her. Later, I acknowledged that there are people who don't agree. For the benefit of those people, I suggested a few potential baddies they might consider voting for in place of both Zebra and myself. It isn't contradictory to say we should lynch Zebra instead of me and we should lynch Faraday instead of me. I'm not saying I don't want to lynch Zebra any more and never have or will. All I said was that I know some people don't want to do it. I don't see why that's such an issue and don't understand why Mac makes such a huge deal out of it.

Linki - I didn't take anything out of context. It was at least 50% a joke too.

Bullzeye wrote:
Please tell me which votes other than your own, Zebra's or Matt's don't deserve to have a finger waved at them.

Let me rephrase this one. Mac obviously is too biased to explain why his own vote is innocent. Zebra's comes from a baddie so doesn't need explaining, and I don't think Matt is bad. I want to understand why Canuck and Bubbles shouldn't be eyeballed for their votes though since both are shady for different reasons.

MacDougall wrote:

Bullzeye wrote:

MacDougall wrote:Furthermore if you're a civ I want you to get yourself out of it. You are literally in a lynch-off with a confirmed scum. You must be looking mighty scummy to have 6 votes on you dude, considering Empire would be hoping we lynch Zebra and Zebra can have no more than 1 teammate, you have a lot of civs on your wagon I can assure you of that.

I defend myself and you tell me I'm bad for defending myself but then tell me you want me to defend myself.

Not quite. I didn't say I want you to defend yourself. I said, "if you're a civ I want you to get yourself out of it." For someone who's so pissed about being misrepresented this is pretty hypocritical.

By 'get yourself out of it' I understood 'defend'. I don't see what other option there is to get out of a lynch.

MacDougall wrote:Now. Your defense amounts to waving your finger at your voters. Your answers to my questions is the first time you've defended many of those points.

Please tell me which votes other than your own, Zebra's or Matt's don't deserve to have a finger waved at them.

MacDougall wrote:You must admit it's pretty coincidental that you've got time to play when the lynch wagon is coming for you?

You mean the past 12 hours? No. Not really.

MacDougall wrote:If I were a civ, and I was in a lynch off with a confirmed scum and somehow ahead on votes. I would probably be focusing more on convincing people of reasons to vote for the confirmed scum rather than chucking a hissy fit and calling everyone voting for me bad. I'd still be chucking a hissy fit no doubt.

If you were a civ? Okay.

Please tell me what there is I could possibly say to convince someone who doesn't already think Zebra needs to be lynched. Especially something that hasn't already been said. Zebra has done all the work for me as far as building a case goes.

MacDougall wrote:

Bullzeye wrote:*snip*
Seriously, there is almost no case on me whatsoever. *snip* Otherwise in a couple of hours you'll be asking yourself how anyone could possibly have been a part of such a crappy bandwagon.

It's comments like these that are the reason you have votes on you.

*sigh*

Also I just want to make it clear I'm not 'rage-quivering'. I'm not angry. I'm just disappointed.

This is an annoying lynch but I'm okay with it if it goes ahead since I legit don't have time to play and feel bad I jumped into a game I couldn't actually commit to. I've done my best and tried to help even if it wasn't always obvious.

nijuukyugou wrote:Okay, I now know why zebra's being voted, and I suppose the reason there aren't more votes is because she doesn't kill tonight? I've never played a game like this before. I understand what people are doing (although I'm not caught up enough yet to see why Bullzeye is being suspected as Empire, so keep standing by), but...still? Voting for someone being speculated as a baddie versus voting an outed baddie? And Mac just said in linki that he wants Bullz to defend himself to get less votes than an outed baddie?

This game is weird AF. I'll continue reading now.

Niju you are my new favourite. Congratulations.

MacDougall wrote:Furthermore if you're a civ I want you to get yourself out of it. You are literally in a lynch-off with a confirmed scum. You must be looking mighty scummy to have 6 votes on you dude, considering Empire would be hoping we lynch Zebra and Zebra can have no more than 1 teammate, you have a lot of civs on your wagon I can assure you of that.

I defend myself and you tell me I'm bad for defending myself but then tell me you want me to defend myself.

MacDougall wrote: Bullzeye, Bullzeye...

You literally did the things I said you did. There is no misrepresenting. You did those things. Stop saying you didn't. I quoted posts that show that you did them. If you want to defend yourself tell me why you did those things, don't just try to claim that you didn't.

I didn't discredit anything at all because there was NOTHING to discredit.

MacDougall wrote:Why did you come into the thread half cocked saying that there's no reason not to lynch the confirmed townie when there was?

As I've said, I meant that I hadn't been convinced by the arguments put forth.

MacDougall wrote:Why did you claim you'd read the posts when you hadn't?

I had. Why would anyone do that?

MacDougall wrote:Why did you cast your vote specifically to save MP?

I thought he was a civ. I can be wrong. I regularly am.

MacDougall wrote:Why have you all of a sudden been super active with the pressure on but apparently too busy to play the rest of the game?

Today happened to be a day where I wasn't doing much. Not to mention I've become 'all of a sudden super active' in the late hours of the evening, leading into night. I can always go to the pub instead if you'd prefer.

MacDougall wrote:Your inability to even entertain the points being raised against you are not a good look. Neither is just wildly pointing the finger at everyone voting for you. Especially myself. Stop rage-quivering and think about the situation. If you're a civ, you'll get yourself out of this.

I have entertained some of your points. I will not entertain points where you accuse me of trying to discredit cases that don't exist or misrepresent things I've said.

Seriously, there is almost no case on me whatsoever. Even if you really really really really want to lynch an Empire, lynch Zebra today. You're not getting your wish either way from the sound of things, so best to go with the actual baddie of the two people currently on offer. Otherwise in a couple of hours you'll be asking yourself how anyone could possibly have been a part of such a crappy bandwagon.

Canucklehead wrote:

Bullzeye wrote:I see there are six votes left. I encourage you all to vote Zebra. It shouldn't take much, she's done the work for me. Look at the votes on me:
Zebra: An outed baddie.
Matt: Allegedly didn't mean to leave his vote there. The only person on this wagon I don't distrust.
Mac: Has been twisting my words and exaggerating my actions - lynch him next.
Canuck: Implied she thought Mac's vote for me was a bad idea, then followed it anyway and has essentially pre-emptively given him her share of the blame.
Bubbles: Okay seriously read that post and tell me it's a vote worth following.

A vote for me is a vote for a civ, and a vote on the shadiest wagon in history. There are densely covered patches of the Amazon with less shade. A vote for Zebra is a vote for someone who has dropped any pretense of being a civ. I don't think it's a tough choice.

Linki - I do think you're bad. I think you should be lynched next, and will vote for you next if I survive today. Then it will be a toss-up between Canuck and Bubbles.

That's not an honest view of me!
I'll take whatever blame may be
Due me once you're good and gone,
But I doubt we're wrong, young padawan.
Clever of you to try and cast
Aspersions on me while I'm blasted
With this curse and can't defend
Articulately. Smooth, my friend.

It's not like you're insanified. You said that you were shocked by Mac's vote, and that though you trust him you think his choice kinda stinks. You also said earlier you weren't sure about me. Then you said you were voting with Mac. When someone says "I'm voting with X" and hasn't said anything against the person they're voting for, that's essentially putting the responsibility on someone else. I alluded to the suspicion you might do this when I told you to own your choice. Of course, your vote came up in the linki so it was pointless anyway.

MacDougall wrote:Lynch me next? Lmao. Okay.

You've twisted my words and tried to make it look like my opinions contradict one another when they don't. You said I tried to discredit a case and say people who believe it are stupid when the 'case' in question was clearly a joke. I can't think of a thing you've said about me that isn't super shady.

MacDougall wrote:I'm glad we have encountered a scum who is putting up a fight though, that's fun.

No we haven't. I'm having fun though, in as much as a potentially doomed civ can.

MacDougall wrote:

Bullzeye wrote:And before you say I'm just NO Uing everyone, I also think DFaraday's vote is one of the shadiest in this game so far and he's probably bad too. Bass doesn't look spotless either.

What do you think of DFaraday's indie claim? Just reckon he's lying about that?

Yep. Probably.

And before you say I'm just NO Uing everyone, I also think DFaraday's vote is one of the shadiest in this game so far and he's probably bad too. Bass doesn't look spotless either.