Search found 8 matches

by BigDamnHero
Wed Aug 17, 2016 10:07 pm
Forum: Fantasy Football
Topic: POLL: Scoring and Settings Preferences
Replies: 34
Views: 1402

Re: POLL: Scoring and Settings Preferences

Now thats in excellent point! Why don't punters get points if they pinned opposition back at the one yard line or having exceptionally long hang time on the return? Then you can also get negative points for muffing a punt.
by BigDamnHero
Wed Aug 17, 2016 5:10 pm
Forum: Fantasy Football
Topic: POLL: Scoring and Settings Preferences
Replies: 34
Views: 1402

Re: POLL: Scoring and Settings Preferences

I'm good with ALL of that...
by BigDamnHero
Wed Aug 17, 2016 5:49 am
Forum: Fantasy Football
Topic: POLL: Scoring and Settings Preferences
Replies: 34
Views: 1402

Re: POLL: Scoring and Settings Preferences

Looking over the rules, I see trade approvals are set for 4 days...maybe we wanna change that to 2 days, maybe 3? Because presumably after the week ends monday night, if someone wanted to trade for a player playing thursday, it wouldn't go through in time.

also, did you check whatever box to ROUND-UP pts...or whatever that was that got messed up last year on the ESPN site?
by BigDamnHero
Sat Jul 30, 2016 9:14 pm
Forum: Fantasy Football
Topic: POLL: Scoring and Settings Preferences
Replies: 34
Views: 1402

Re: POLL: Scoring and Settings Preferences

Turnip Head wrote:
Probably a Tim Tebow fan wrote:I've never played in an IDP league, so how does that work? Is there an extra slot for that position or does it eliminate Def or take another position's spot?
I've seen it both ways. It can either take the place of Team Defense or complement it.

With IDP you get points for things like tackles, sacks, passes defended, those sorts of things.
You realize this isn't the Psych thread, right?

I'd be good with IDP to complement the normal DEF pos.
by BigDamnHero
Sat Jul 30, 2016 8:53 pm
Forum: Fantasy Football
Topic: POLL: Scoring and Settings Preferences
Replies: 34
Views: 1402

Re: POLL: Scoring and Settings Preferences

Turnip Head wrote:
Epignosis wrote:Three points for every dab. :clap:
He said he's retiring it.
$20 says he still dabs at some point this season...


I think he should bring back the Charleston...

Image

...until he accidently round-houses another player (or even funnier a referee) or else tears his ACL. :haha:
by BigDamnHero
Sat Jul 30, 2016 8:49 pm
Forum: Fantasy Football
Topic: POLL: Scoring and Settings Preferences
Replies: 34
Views: 1402

Re: POLL: Scoring and Settings Preferences

Turnip Head wrote:
BigDamnHero wrote:
Turnip Head wrote:If we did all purpose yards, then return yards would be worth less than rushing/receiving/passing. Something like 30 yards per point, maybe even less.
I think this undervalues A LOT of lower tier players whose contributions are equal to that of any other player but the only time they get a chance to make plays is on special teams. For example, last year Ameer Abdullah had more yds as a kick returner than he did at the RB position, and that had value for his team but wasn't reflected in our league.

It would also make things more competitive because there are more options at free agents rather than sifting through the pile of garbage hoping for someone who could score more than 3-5 pts. in a given week.
I'm trying to do a max of 12 teams per league, and at least this first league will have a short bench (5 players). It shouldn't be too difficult to find decent fill ins or even every week starters on the waiver wire, and there should always be something there if you need it. Players DO get points for return TDs so those types of players are still valuabke if you need to roll the dice.

linki Lmao, punters. Now I'm sold.
to your first point, I will concede that a smaller league will alleviate some of that, but to the second point, those players only have value IF they score a TD. They could run it back for 60, 70, 80 yds, but ONLY get credit for the effort if they get it in the endzome which, given the state of kick returns, is few and far between.

I look at it like this: fantasy football is like coaching an actual team of players. Just because a player doesn't score doesn't mean they don't have value. Every yardage gain should have a benefit not just to the individual but to the team.

I seem to be the only one in favor of this, so I'm fine to concede to the group consensus.

I've never played in an IDP league, so how does that work? Is there an extra slot for that position or does it eliminate Def or take another position's spot?
by BigDamnHero
Sat Jul 30, 2016 7:59 pm
Forum: Fantasy Football
Topic: POLL: Scoring and Settings Preferences
Replies: 34
Views: 1402

Re: POLL: Scoring and Settings Preferences

Turnip Head wrote:If we did all purpose yards, then return yards would be worth less than rushing/receiving/passing. Something like 30 yards per point, maybe even less.
I think this undervalues A LOT of lower tier players whose contributions are equal to that of any other player but the only time they get a chance to make plays is on special teams. For example, last year Ameer Abdullah had more yds as a kick returner than he did at the RB position, and that had value for his team but wasn't reflected in our league.

It would also make things more competitive because there are more options at free agents rather than sifting through the pile of garbage hoping for someone who could score more than 3-5 pts. in a given week.
by BigDamnHero
Sat Jul 30, 2016 11:27 am
Forum: Fantasy Football
Topic: POLL: Scoring and Settings Preferences
Replies: 34
Views: 1402

Re: POLL: Scoring and Settings Preferences

Me too...

Also, I'm a fan of all-purpose yds. It allows even the lowliest of bench players to score as much as a top tier player (i.e. punt returners).

Return to “POLL: Scoring and Settings Preferences”