The Syndicate

Enrique wrote:Typh, okay. I'm not saying BADDIES themselves would be sharing any real info, I'm saying they would want to know what others got. That's why as a baddie you encourage that discussion. That's why as a civ you don't.

Fair enough.

The Hosts said it is not in anyones best interest to discuss it. You said it was in the baddies best interest.

Those are two different things.

Enrique wrote:sig can we avoid the wifom please. You were very actively pushing for something that benefits the baddies. Even you seem to admit that it was too obvious? Why?

why would bad people do bad stuff sig i dunno you tell me

How do you know it benefits the baddies?

Actually I don't think she's defensive as a baddie really. She herself agree Interesting Typh. What about World Reborn? As for teammates: She was not vocally defensive about Juliets, but she definitely pushed the thread into another direction by lynching Canuck. She said she saw me more civ than ba...

Actually I don't think she's defensive as a baddie really. She herself agree

I think she's more emotional/defensive as a civvie. So right now I'd lean more towards civ.

Linki: That's about SVS

Juliets who do you think you'll be voting today?

I'd like to know where you're thinking to put your vote today and why? Not sure, but I know I'm not staying at the Docks. What's at the docks? (It's ok, explain in code that only I will understand) Zebra was so kind to point out what's at the Docks here . Also, it smells like fish aka your mom :kad...

I'd rather focus in individual cases.
Ie if you can point me to a player who's been unusually quiet and avoiding conflicts, I'm willing to listen.

Dunno. I was not pinged by any of the major convo's going on. I thought Nerolunar pushing Arkham Asylum with the Riddler thingy might have had a nefarious purpose, but it seems there aren't any negatives from going there as we now know. SVS seemed to be trying something with Glorfindel, hence why I ...

Typhoony do you think it's sketchy that some people really want to talk about their info? What would it take to make you do that? I don't know if I would call it sketchy. As I said earlier somewhere, my main concern is that we have no idea what this thingy is about, who it benefits and who it does ...

juliets wrote: I'd like to know where you're thinking to put your vote today and why?

Not sure, but I know I'm not staying at the Docks.

Typhoony do you think it's sketchy that some people really want to talk about their info? What would it take to make you do that? I don't know if I would call it sketchy. As I said earlier somewhere, my main concern is that we have no idea what this thingy is about, who it benefits and who it does ...

juliets wrote:
Typhoony wrote:Hello nubs.
Hello nubphoony have you got something you would like to share? Like your take on whats going on?

What would you like my take on?

Hello nubs.

I've thought about that, and realized I wasn't going to go insane thinking about it. Better to just wait and see what will happen :P

I think that the reason (at least I) am seeing more sincere discussion is directly tied to the smaller mafia teams. IMO, more standard sized mafia teams are able to get into discussions easier because they have a handful of players that they can rely on to either support them or at the very least n...

a2thezebra wrote:
Typhoony wrote:nub Zebra.
Do you think revealing this is going to hurt the both of us or just me?

I don't think it will hurt either of us. I'm more concerned with who it might potentially help.
And since we have no idea on that front, I would have preferred if you had not mentioned it.

nub Zebra.

I'm not opposed to voting a low poster, but I will rarely actually advocate lynching one. I did that just recently in Enriques speed game, and those were pretty extraordinary circumstances that we're not even close to here.
Aside from that, I don't think it should ever be the main focus of the thread.

Are we sure it's a good idea to talk about this stuff? One of the rules specifically mentions that it is not in your best interest to talk about the map

Are you suspicious of Glorfindel SVS? I am not sure, tbh. I was just intrigued by his reaction to having read the thread. There was alot of tunnel type stuff and some quite a bit of tension at some points going on, and he only noted one thing, and his opinion on that seemed a bit one dimensional. H...

Are you suspicious of Glorfindel SVS?

Do you actually expect anyone to answer those question Mac?

Enrique wrote: sig I see no reason to assume Gotham would start at 100%? The game would practically be gifted to them at that point.

Epi answered this already

That he's a nub

You and I definitely see game mechanics the same way, sig. Wayne can win with the mafia. They don't want to (because killing mafia nets them points and killing civs subtract points) but ultimately they will do what they need to do to win, and if that means taking out the last civ to end the game al...

Nerolunar wrote: I still believe we should go to AA though. Im wondering if there is a mechanic that makes the Riddler place clues where he has been. He has been at Arkham, so it wouldn´t surprise me if there was one.

What is this based on?

Looks like you are in the clear sig. I know I say this and then people still sus me anyway but... I'm GOING to be quieter this game. I have a plan for the very few games I can sign up for in the coming months. Arkham was not on that plan. I just started a new role at work, and have heaps of other s...

Hosts: Does anyone have any info about this poll?

I'd play this in a heart beat. Claiming Choronzon 2.0, please give me revenge upon the traiterous swine that is called Loki.

I am joining my good friend Zebra to the docks

I got halfway through my Zebra re-read and my eyes glazed over. I had to take a break. I spent way too much of my morning brain power mafia-ing. Actually, I'd really like to know what you are thinking SD. Yes, so if we lynch a civ, I can totally blame it on you , SD. I will take no accountability f...

Do rock paper scissors!

They should've just followed my last post

If the dead make 10 posts do they get rezzed?

S~V~S wrote:
indiglo wrote:I'm not sure what to do either, SD.
Wow, you're bad.

I agree, but then SD says she's already achieved her win con and just has to survive, which we know is bullshit.

I'm sorry but this is absolutely disgraceful.

3 posts this day so far, all by baddies.

Welcome ekeknat.

Thanks for fighting the good fight, except that one time when you went ahead and voted me

lol @ them discussing my post almost a week after my death

Isn't there only one Coq civ left?

i'm rooting for my girl Dana. I don't care who wins, as long as she survives

.

I don't see the GP civs winning though.

Hey Enrique, what happens if there are 3 Gay baddiesleft and like 1 Gay civ and a Coq civ? Will the baddies get the win or will they have to eliminate the last Gay civ?

I don't know whether to applaud the baddies or to boo the civvies.

I'm not even talking about Made's posts, the fact that she was insanified twice is a huge hint to her identity.

This one: Well I'm gonna get lynched. So... I think tonight some protection for Ekeknat would be nice. Tomorrow you guys should lynch LC if you want a Gay Parade baddie. What else... I want BR to explain what team she thinks Zebra is on and if she thinks LC is bad. I don't think DF/ekeknat/Made/SD/s...

I am going to be absolutely baffled if any of the civs follow in voting Made.

Linki:

If indiglo is bad, that would make my last post before my lynch amazing

Well played Matt

This thread is becoming more active than the actual game

Search found 790 matches