The Syndicate

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 10:36 am If Urist is serious about the vault city post we should still chop LC I think

In what world does Urist's alleged level of seriousness equate to chopping me?

c4e5g3d5 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 10:27 am
Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 9:43 am
c4e5g3d5 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 8:49 am Still catching up.

Dom wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:47 am
c4e5g3d5 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 8:14 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 8:08 pm
c4e5g3d5 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 7:57 pm All that talk of trying extra hard huh.
What is your mafia experience? What sort of things will you be looking for on Day 1?
My experience is a bunch of games, most on AoPS, some on MU, and I'm looking for AI posts like a normal person.
What the fresh hell does this mean? Vague on vague on vague. I am not entertained.
[VOTE: C4] aubergine
Nani the fuck you picked the single least vague post I've made in this entire thread to call vague. Fake read sir.
What do you mean "fake read"? Why is that wolfy? What is "Nani the fuck"?
Fake read: A read that isn't real
Wolfy: Dom wasn't actually trying to evaluate me but was acting like he was
Nani the fuck: Wtf

So literally the exact same thing I scumread Esooa for. Yet you acted like that was outrageous. Nanny fuck what's up?

There's nothing incorrect about Dom's post. "I played games in places, and uh, I try to read posts." LOL yeah that's not vague at all. You're the fake one, Seefore.

Sloonei, Dom town. Esooa mafia. Alison/Joseph unaligned. Daisy town. C4 mafia. Poison town.

Heading to work.

Poison wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 6:49 am wait, you people are going to hate me for catching out loud in the thread right?

Catching wolves?

I say do it loud and proud!

c4e5g3d5 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 8:49 am Still catching up.

Dom wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:47 am
c4e5g3d5 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 8:14 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 8:08 pm
c4e5g3d5 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 7:57 pm All that talk of trying extra hard huh.
What is your mafia experience? What sort of things will you be looking for on Day 1?
My experience is a bunch of games, most on AoPS, some on MU, and I'm looking for AI posts like a normal person.
What the fresh hell does this mean? Vague on vague on vague. I am not entertained.
[VOTE: C4] aubergine
Nani the fuck you picked the single least vague post I've made in this entire thread to call vague. Fake read sir.

What do you mean "fake read"? Why is that wolfy? What is "Nani the fuck"?

Urist wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 1:02 am
Dom wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 1:00 am to this post. Big yuck!
Maybe it's because I don't know this player, but posts like this scream "I am contributing SEE!" rather than "let us have consensus my fellow human beings."
i want that sweet sweet towncred when LC/Poison flip mafia so that i can coast the rest of the game

staypositivefriend wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:55 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:53 pm
staypositivefriend wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:44 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:17 pm
staypositivefriend wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:03 pm two primary reasons:

1. cloaking my townreads in ambiguity almost always gets interesting and telling interactions out of people. in this case, i think that foresight's intense amount of stress that only grew larger as i refused to directly answer his question is likely to come from a town indicative place. his irritation felt completely authentic- i honestly don't think that foresight would care that much at all if he was playing from a scum mindset

2. one of my early townleans was on you, but i felt uncomfortable outing that early into the game for a number of reasons. (partially out of the vanity of not wanting to be wrong). the other was on foresight
My concern, as TSP alludes to, is that spf's secret town reads maneuver is something I do often, and notably did in the Champs Finale to the frustration of about half the roster. Part of me feels like spf is mirroring my town meta here, maybe unconsciously, as a way to earn my trust.

We have played... three? games together. Two were in the Champs setting (both town/town), and more recently we were scum partners in Grasslands here on The Syndicate. When we've been town together, we were both distinctly aware of one another (I think. I was aware of her, at least) because our playstyles are similar. I would expect a mafia staypositivefriend to be hyper aware of my perception of her in this game, in what would be the first game we've ever been aligned opposite each other. So kicking the game off by doing a combative thing that Town Sloonei does for attention would be a viable way to do that.

Except, like Foresight says, there really wasn't much call for that play here. When I did it in Champs, the thread was moving at a breakneck pace, but I felt it was lacking traction. I did it to slow things down and get people to focus on particular issues. This thread was not moving at a fast pace when spf dropped her post. If anything, it needed more spiciness.

I'm also unclear why she was hesitant to declare a town read on me a half hour ago, but is comfortable doing so now.
the thing is - i do the "I Have Secret Reads That I'm Not Gonna Share Yet" is a maneuver that i do very commonly as either alignment

i did it in grasslands when we were teamed together, i did it in the rock falls invitational game when i was town, and i even did it multiple times in champs. it's just a style of scumhunting/provoking discussion that i really like doing, and i think it's a mistake to assume that this tactic that i do incredibly often of my own accord is something that i'm doing to appeal specifically to ~you~. truthfully, i didn't even associate that tactic with your playstyle at all

i would probably be incredibly aware about your perception of me if i rolled mafia against you, but your analysis implies a depth of thought that i haven't actually put into my posts so far.

my choice to withhold my reads provoked a lengthy discussion that we are still discussing right now 5 pages later - do you not agree that this might be more valuable than if i had simply said: "i townlean foresight and sloonei' and left it at that?
How do secret reads you don't share provoke discussion?
it usually results in people being suspicious of me for not outing my reads

or people trying to guess what reads i have, which can be a good way into tricking people into sharing reads that they weren't consciously prepared to out

or people trying to badger me into outing my reads, which can be alignment indicative within itself (and i think it was for foresight)

in any case, it usually gets more interesting reactions than if i just say: "i townlean x'. it's the same reason why i like self-voting in RVS

Approved!

staypositivefriend wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:44 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:17 pm
staypositivefriend wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:03 pm two primary reasons:

1. cloaking my townreads in ambiguity almost always gets interesting and telling interactions out of people. in this case, i think that foresight's intense amount of stress that only grew larger as i refused to directly answer his question is likely to come from a town indicative place. his irritation felt completely authentic- i honestly don't think that foresight would care that much at all if he was playing from a scum mindset

2. one of my early townleans was on you, but i felt uncomfortable outing that early into the game for a number of reasons. (partially out of the vanity of not wanting to be wrong). the other was on foresight
My concern, as TSP alludes to, is that spf's secret town reads maneuver is something I do often, and notably did in the Champs Finale to the frustration of about half the roster. Part of me feels like spf is mirroring my town meta here, maybe unconsciously, as a way to earn my trust.

We have played... three? games together. Two were in the Champs setting (both town/town), and more recently we were scum partners in Grasslands here on The Syndicate. When we've been town together, we were both distinctly aware of one another (I think. I was aware of her, at least) because our playstyles are similar. I would expect a mafia staypositivefriend to be hyper aware of my perception of her in this game, in what would be the first game we've ever been aligned opposite each other. So kicking the game off by doing a combative thing that Town Sloonei does for attention would be a viable way to do that.

Except, like Foresight says, there really wasn't much call for that play here. When I did it in Champs, the thread was moving at a breakneck pace, but I felt it was lacking traction. I did it to slow things down and get people to focus on particular issues. This thread was not moving at a fast pace when spf dropped her post. If anything, it needed more spiciness.

I'm also unclear why she was hesitant to declare a town read on me a half hour ago, but is comfortable doing so now.
the thing is - i do the "I Have Secret Reads That I'm Not Gonna Share Yet" is a maneuver that i do very commonly as either alignment

i did it in grasslands when we were teamed together, i did it in the rock falls invitational game when i was town, and i even did it multiple times in champs. it's just a style of scumhunting/provoking discussion that i really like doing, and i think it's a mistake to assume that this tactic that i do incredibly often of my own accord is something that i'm doing to appeal specifically to ~you~. truthfully, i didn't even associate that tactic with your playstyle at all

i would probably be incredibly aware about your perception of me if i rolled mafia against you, but your analysis implies a depth of thought that i haven't actually put into my posts so far.

my choice to withhold my reads provoked a lengthy discussion that we are still discussing right now 5 pages later - do you not agree that this might be more valuable than if i had simply said: "i townlean foresight and sloonei' and left it at that?

How do secret reads you don't share provoke discussion?

Oh come on now

c4e5g3d5 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:11 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:09 pm [VOTE: Esooa] aubergine
Anyone who wants to kill Esooa rn has to go through me first.

c4e5g3d5 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:03 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:01 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:56 pm
Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:55 pm as for the "there wasn't an organic reason to do it"

I'm not so sure about that. Honestly, calling attention to your reads in such a way I almost always dislike; it just feels showy to be

but it's also something that I've seen come from town *at least* as often as scum
What is your motivation for pursuing this discussion to the extent that you are?
I have a theory: she doesn't like that I correctly called her out as scum, and is motivated to get discussion moving elsewhere, with her as the towny discussion motivator.
My satire radar is in need of repair, I'll need some help here.

This is the Documentary Channel, C3P0.

Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:02 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:01 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:56 pm
Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:55 pm as for the "there wasn't an organic reason to do it"

I'm not so sure about that. Honestly, calling attention to your reads in such a way I almost always dislike; it just feels showy to be

but it's also something that I've seen come from town *at least* as often as scum
What is your motivation for pursuing this discussion to the extent that you are?
I have a theory: she doesn't like that I correctly called her out as scum, and is motivated to get discussion moving elsewhere, with her as the towny discussion motivator.
you're right I had an interest in not talking about your read. Mostly because it was bad and annoying me

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:56 pm
Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:55 pm as for the "there wasn't an organic reason to do it"

I'm not so sure about that. Honestly, calling attention to your reads in such a way I almost always dislike; it just feels showy to be

but it's also something that I've seen come from town *at least* as often as scum
What is your motivation for pursuing this discussion to the extent that you are?

I have a theory: she doesn't like that I correctly called her out as scum, and is motivated to get discussion moving elsewhere, with her as the towny discussion motivator.

Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:43 pm my scum reads are sloonei, lc, and jjj

That's, like, the three best and handsomest guys on the site!

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:37 pm [VOTE: staypositivefriend] aubergine

Thanks, I'll try.

[VOTE: Keepyourchinup] aubergine

Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:34 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:33 pm
Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:32 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:31 pm LC remains town.
how
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Feb 26, 2021 12:28 am - No player will ever change from one alignment or faction to another.

I'm glad I'm voting you

Who's wolfier, me or Sloonei?

My voters are based on my treatment of you, and yet you remain aloof to it. Afraid of being seen as OMGUS?

Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:33 pm is there a neighborizer this game and can I please be a part of it I love mason and neighbor chats more than anything

Sloonei, Marmot, and I already used up the shots. Now we're doing shots in the secret clubhouse.

Urist wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:32 pm [VOTE: Long Con] aubergine

^ This guy ain't towny, I think we can all agree.

c4e5g3d5 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:32 pm I guess my name is Foresight now.

Gets too close to something that someone will turn dirty.

Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:32 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:31 pm LC remains town.
how

MacDougall wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:29 pm [VOTE: Long Con] aubergine

Are you trying to make me happy?

c4e5g3d5 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:28 pm You don't find it genuine because of a nitpick you try too hard to justify. You are scum.

It wasn't actually that hard to explain. I haven't justified anything, thanks.

I don't even see where KZA is actually discussing her alignment. He's discussing her usual role preference. I don't know if he townreads her or not.

c4e5g3d5 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:25 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:18 pm
c4e5g3d5 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:17 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:13 pm
Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:11 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:07 pm
Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:03 pm

kza town read is cause of this post where he very casually gave information to defend me

towny because he felt prompted to say something in it without a clear motive

so I figure the motive is a genuine want for discussion
Which discussion? Whether you prefer scum roles or not? It's towny to want to delve deeper into that? Was he even doing that?? His comment sounds quite offhanded to me, not indicative of "genuine want for discussion" or an opposition to it. Are you sure this is a real read?
yes, the discussion is relating to my alignment, or you know, solving. And the off handed nature of it is why it's genuine. He did it because he wanted to. He didn't have any clear goal with his read
Now you seem to be contradicting yourself.

How can he display a motive of genuine want for discussion and also have no clear goal with his read?

[VOTE: esooa] aubergine You're being fishy.
Okay cool you found what looks like a contradiction if you squint now say what's actually scum-indicative about it.
Again, that would indicate it's not a real read. Like wolves. Have to make up reads.
The read makes perfect sense to me. Esooa's saying KZA is playing pro-town in a way that doesn't look overly manufactured. Your latching onto this instance of her using two words with contrasting dictionary definitions shows that you don't care about actually evaluating her and just want a read to point to in case someone says you haven't been doing anything. [VOTE: Long Con] aubergine

That is not what it shows. It shows I care about whether posts are genuine or not, and that I don't find Esooa's posts genuine.

Mostly I'm pretty casual about things, moreso than most on Day 1. People fire off suspicions all the time all Day long and I don't see most of them as convincing. Sometimes I get them too. Am I doing it wrong??

Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:22 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:21 pm
Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:20 pm lc can you talk about your approach to this game?
I'd do better if you ask more specific questions. Self-analysis is not a strength of mine.
well as I just said I feel like you're oddly serious right now

do you agree? Why do you think that is?

Sometimes I get down to business.

You need a sec?

Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:21 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:20 pm
Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:20 pm dislike lc so far
As a person or as an alignment?
I think you're pretty cool but the seriousness you're expressing at the start of the first day is making me question you

Question my coolness or question my alignment???

Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:20 pm lc can you talk about your approach to this game?

Oh: "say things I think" is my main plan, I think.

Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:20 pm lc can you talk about your approach to this game?

I'd do better if you ask more specific questions. Self-analysis is not a strength of mine.

Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:20 pm dislike lc so far

As a person or as an alignment?

Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:18 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:17 pm
Like, you don't even consider that it's a casual pocket attempt?
considered it. Didn't think it was. It was too casual, not flattering or showy, and it's not really a thing I'd imagine kza thinks would pocket me

I guess now he knows better.

c4e5g3d5 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:17 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:13 pm
Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:11 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:07 pm
Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:03 pm
Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 7:13 pm
falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 7:06 pm

Why, did you rand scum?
I prefer scum homie

KZA wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 7:15 pmshe's not lying
kza town read is cause of this post where he very casually gave information to defend me

towny because he felt prompted to say something in it without a clear motive

so I figure the motive is a genuine want for discussion
Which discussion? Whether you prefer scum roles or not? It's towny to want to delve deeper into that? Was he even doing that?? His comment sounds quite offhanded to me, not indicative of "genuine want for discussion" or an opposition to it. Are you sure this is a real read?
yes, the discussion is relating to my alignment, or you know, solving. And the off handed nature of it is why it's genuine. He did it because he wanted to. He didn't have any clear goal with his read
Now you seem to be contradicting yourself.

How can he display a motive of genuine want for discussion and also have no clear goal with his read?

[VOTE: esooa] aubergine You're being fishy.
Okay cool you found what looks like a contradiction if you squint now say what's actually scum-indicative about it.

Again, that would indicate it's not a real read. Like wolves. Have to make up reads.

Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:15 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:13 pm
Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:11 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:07 pm
Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:03 pm
Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 7:13 pm
falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 7:06 pm

Why, did you rand scum?
I prefer scum homie

KZA wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 7:15 pmshe's not lying
kza town read is cause of this post where he very casually gave information to defend me

towny because he felt prompted to say something in it without a clear motive

so I figure the motive is a genuine want for discussion
Which discussion? Whether you prefer scum roles or not? It's towny to want to delve deeper into that? Was he even doing that?? His comment sounds quite offhanded to me, not indicative of "genuine want for discussion" or an opposition to it. Are you sure this is a real read?
yes, the discussion is relating to my alignment, or you know, solving. And the off handed nature of it is why it's genuine. He did it because he wanted to. He didn't have any clear goal with his read
Now you seem to be contradicting yourself.

How can he display a motive of genuine want for discussion and also have no clear goal with his read?

[VOTE: esooa] aubergine You're being fishy.
you don't really get what I'm saying so

Like, you don't even consider that it's a casual pocket attempt?

MacDougall wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:13 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:11 pm
Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:08 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 7:33 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 2:13 am
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 1:26 am Pros: Yes
Cons: Long
Gameplan: N/A
Misc.: Data missing
My dating app matched us up for same Cons. Wanna mason?
I am actually going to slap a serious-but-early town read on LC for this post. Casual joke from the implicit perspective of a civilian on Day 0. I like Bachelor #1 here.
I scum read sloonei for this post. Saying someone is towny for something like mentioning masons being implicit town perspective just seems fake. It's a completely normal and easy thing to do, that I don't really feel like portrays a towny perspective the way sloonei does.
Hmmm.. maybe. I like it better than Mac's take.
You like Esooa's actual reasons better than my post that contained nothing? And felt the need to express that?

LC mafia. Ez game.

I knew I had extended too far. Joseph.

Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:11 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:07 pm
Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:03 pm
Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 7:13 pm
falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 7:06 pm
Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 7:03 pm I kinda regret this
Why, did you rand scum?
I prefer scum homie

KZA wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 7:15 pmshe's not lying
kza town read is cause of this post where he very casually gave information to defend me

towny because he felt prompted to say something in it without a clear motive

so I figure the motive is a genuine want for discussion
Which discussion? Whether you prefer scum roles or not? It's towny to want to delve deeper into that? Was he even doing that?? His comment sounds quite offhanded to me, not indicative of "genuine want for discussion" or an opposition to it. Are you sure this is a real read?
yes, the discussion is relating to my alignment, or you know, solving. And the off handed nature of it is why it's genuine. He did it because he wanted to. He didn't have any clear goal with his read

Now you seem to be contradicting yourself.

How can he display a motive of genuine want for discussion and also have no clear goal with his read?

[VOTE: esooa] aubergine You're being fishy.

Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:08 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 7:33 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 2:13 am
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 1:26 am Pros: Yes
Cons: Long
Gameplan: N/A
Misc.: Data missing
My dating app matched us up for same Cons. Wanna mason?
I am actually going to slap a serious-but-early town read on LC for this post. Casual joke from the implicit perspective of a civilian on Day 0. I like Bachelor #1 here.
I scum read sloonei for this post. Saying someone is towny for something like mentioning masons being implicit town perspective just seems fake. It's a completely normal and easy thing to do, that I don't really feel like portrays a towny perspective the way sloonei does.

Hmmm.. maybe. I like it better than Mac's take.

Poison wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:08 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:04 pm
Urist wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 8:47 pm
staypositivefriend wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 8:30 pm
Urist wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 8:28 pm [VOTE: c4e5g3d5] aubergine

Poison & Long Con are mafia as well.
TSP is a maybe
why are poison & long con mafia
Their posts are bad.
I guess you agree on c4 since you didn't ask about that one
I think you should look again, mine are all 100% pure town. Wine from the towny vine, and steaks from purebred town cows, raised in Town.

MacDougall wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 8:57 pm sloonei is mafia
No, I don't believe he is.
Re: poisen and LC mafia

CHAOS!!!!!!!

Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:03 pm
Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 7:13 pm
falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 7:06 pm
Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 7:03 pm I kinda regret this
Why, did you rand scum?
I prefer scum homie

KZA wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 7:15 pmshe's not lying
kza town read is cause of this post where he very casually gave information to defend me

towny because he felt prompted to say something in it without a clear motive

so I figure the motive is a genuine want for discussion

Which discussion? Whether you prefer scum roles or not? It's towny to want to delve deeper into that? Was he even doing that?? His comment sounds quite offhanded to me, not indicative of "genuine want for discussion" or an opposition to it. Are you sure this is a real read?

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:04 pm
Poison wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:02 pm
TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:01 pm I owe someone a thing. I was going to do this before eod0 but then I fell asleep. The best laid plans...

pros: limited
cons: f3 thrower
gameplan: sheep smart people then make a passionate case on d3 and get a townie chopped
Wait you are still alive? Aren't you supposed to get lynched the moment you say mafia or "maphia"
after that game three people tried it in other games and it didn't work so well for them

Sounds like

a threat.

Urist wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 8:47 pm
staypositivefriend wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 8:30 pm
Urist wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 8:28 pm [VOTE: c4e5g3d5] aubergine

Poison & Long Con are mafia as well.
TSP is a maybe
why are poison & long con mafia
Their posts are bad.
I guess you agree on c4 since you didn't ask about that one

I think you should look again, mine are all 100% pure town. Wine from the towny vine, and steaks from purebred town cows, raised in Town.

MacDougall wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 8:57 pm sloonei is mafia

No, I don't believe he is.

If I'm already outed as town, what kind of fakeclaim should I give to deceive the wolves? Just claim vanilla?

Rude.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 2:21 am
Long Con wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 2:13 am
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 1:26 am Pros: Yes
Cons: Long
Gameplan: N/A
Misc.: Data missing
My dating app matched us up for same Cons. Wanna mason?
What's your zodiac sign?

I prefer to keep it multiple choice...

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 1:26 am Pros: Yes
Cons: Long
Gameplan: N/A
Misc.: Data missing

My dating app matched us up for same Cons. Wanna mason?

Pros: Most likely to scumslip if mafia
Cons: Long
Gameplan: Read along and shake my head until someone does something that triggers me, proceed into tunnel
Misc.: Gameplay improves as game progresses

Search found 294 matches