The Syndicate

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Fri Nov 23, 2018 2:30 am Damn what if I hosted a fucked up revamp of Death Note Mafia that just went absolutely apeshit.

juliets wrote: ↑Thu Nov 22, 2018 7:25 pm

Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Thu Nov 22, 2018 7:21 pm

juliets wrote: ↑Thu Nov 22, 2018 7:20 pm

Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Thu Nov 22, 2018 6:24 pm

Soneji wrote: ↑Thu Nov 22, 2018 5:16 pm Co-hosting Favorites on NF is just a given now.

Is The Syndicate really ready for Favorites? Did this game prepare them enough?

Well they had U-Pick early this year, which is basically Baby Favorites.

Not sure if they are ready but maybe the only way for them to be ready is throw them right into it.

Or we could get Shizune to host a game in the next queue. A good old WoW game with 6 factions and 3 indies should be a good warm-up. I'd be barred from the queue anyway since I just hosted this. Then we launch Favorites at the end of 2019.

LOL we're not babies. We may not be familiar with the set up but that doesn't mean we'll run crying to our mamas unless it's poorly run or poorly designed. Bring it on I say.

(it's just trash talking, please don't mind it)

But yeah I'm pretty sure this place can handle crazy setups just fine. After CC123 I don't doubt anything.

HaHaHa so true!

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Wed Nov 21, 2018 12:53 am I'll be your Huckleberry.

nutella wrote: ↑Wed Nov 21, 2018 12:52 am

Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Nov 21, 2018 12:50 am

nutella wrote: ↑Wed Nov 21, 2018 12:43 am No but I drank a shitload of wine the other night and you know what they say, in vino veritas.


....That has an interesting added meaning in mafia doesn't it.

Beautiful. Am I right in thinking a Tombstone connection there?

Never seen it sorry

nutella wrote: ↑Wed Nov 21, 2018 12:43 am No but I drank a shitload of wine the other night and you know what they say, in vino veritas.


....That has an interesting added meaning in mafia doesn't it.

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Tue Nov 20, 2018 11:50 pm

Long Con wrote: ↑Tue Nov 20, 2018 11:50 pm what why

I forget but it might have been your whole thing with finding Hallows or w/e.

my whole thing...

no, of course I would have been a good kill, having voted last for TH. Then you kill nova and get a Hallow anyway. Bastard.

juliets wrote: ↑Sat Nov 17, 2018 1:40 pm

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 17, 2018 9:35 am But seriously, Juliets is my actual packmate.

my name is spelled with a little "j"

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 16, 2018 12:05 am

juliets wrote: ↑Thu Nov 15, 2018 9:04 pm

poutanko wrote: ↑Thu Nov 15, 2018 8:28 pm @ColinIsCool @DharmaHelper @juliets @Lunalee @MacDougall @nutella @sprityo @timmer Any of you targeted Jay N3 and got a result? I wonder if Jay has Thestral resulting in me getting no result (instead of me getting blocked).

No, I used my one-time only Phoenix on N3 to razz TH and got INH instead

Lol appreciated.

I thought this was very cool.

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Wed Nov 14, 2018 5:25 pm

nutella wrote: ↑Wed Nov 14, 2018 5:22 pm Guess I fucked up. Sorry if I could have prevented someone's death by not blocking Colin, stupid mistake. But thinking about it he looks better for this. Sprityo is still very likely imo so I'm voting there for now.

Nutella out here GRINDING for that "Oopsie Poopsie" 2018 award.

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Wed Nov 14, 2018 12:26 am LONG CON LINKS

Spoiler: show

1http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewtopic.php ... 26#p490426 Kara
2 http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 44#p490644 Luna
3 http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 48#p490648 Nutella, owner
4 http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 49#p490649 Glorf
5 http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 51#p490651 Mac
6 http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 52#p490652 Glorf, Jay
7 http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 87#p490687 Colin
8 http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 25#p490725 Owner
9 http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 48#p490748 Kara
10 http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 13#p490913 Jack
11. http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 53#p490953 Nutella
12. http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 54#p491054 Owner, Luna
13. http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 79#p491179 Owner
14. http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 21#p491321 Owner, Colin
15 http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 35#p491335 Timmer
16 http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 37#p491337 Colin, Mac
17. http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 38#p491338 Colin, Mac
18. http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 52#p491352 Nutella, Owner
19. http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 00#p491600 Luna
20. http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 07#p491607 Owner, Kara
21. http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 81#p491981 Glorf
22. http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 85#p491985 Kara, Timmer, Luna
23. http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 64#p492164 INH
24. http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 69#p492169 Jack
25 http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 62#p492362 Nutella, Luna
26. http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 80#p492380 Timmer, Owner
27. http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 01#p492601 Owner, Nutella, Glorf
28. http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 32#p492632 Mac, Nutella
29. http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 83#p492683 Colin
30. http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 22#p492722 Timmer
31. http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 26#p492726 Timmer
32. http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 53#p492753 Colin
33. http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 13#p492913 Colin

----
Link Explanations:

Spoiler: show

1. Goofy Dingus post saying Kara's name sounds like a forbidden spell
2. Wants me to explain my "juicy" Lunalee suspicion/catch
3. Commends Nutella for her player salad catch against Owner calling it a "proven" finder of baddies.
4. Defends Glorf/JC from truth meta
5. Goofy Dingus post saying Mac should get lynched
6. Up Glorf's ass about saving Bad-Jay for later.
7. Defends against Colin's whole "Pedantic" thing
8. Defends Owner from me RE: Dark Arts/Hallows slip
9. Interestingly the only person left alive from Long Con's "I'm not on a team with" post is Kara.
10. Goofy Dingus post about Jack's Long Con vote.
11. Wants Jay's opinion on nutella.
12. Defends Owner again, Sees TH/Luna as W/w
13. Doesn't think Owner is bad, votes TH.
14. +1's Owner's suspicion of Colin
15. Thinks Timmer's post was "hedgey"
16. Agrees with Colin and Mac that Bullz' nova vote looks suspect.
17. "Kind of" suspects Colin and Mac for jumping on Bullz.
18. Pokes Nutella RE: Owner "remembering" Jay tied the vote at 4.
19. Big post about how bad Luna is
20. Defends Owner from Kara. The "if Owner turns up scum" thing is the big red flag here
21. Suspicious of Glorf
22. Votes Luna, ditches Bullz suspicion based on Timmer being a cop. "Could vote for" Kara if it came down to it.
23. Votes INH based on the salad thing
24. Goofy Dingus Jack interaction
25. Prods Nutella to respond to Luna
26. Cops to protecting Owner D1
27. Says sloonei "townslipped" Sees Speeds suspicion of Glorf and nutella as "healthy". says Sprityo has "said nothing"
28. Says Mac accidentally revealed Nutella as civ
29. Opines that Colin might be bad looking to get rezzed
30. Goofy Dingus post about voting for Timmer
31. "Feels good" about Timmer
32. Finds Colin's play to be "pretty strong"
33. Votes Colin

Conclusions: not a full ISO but far more than enough to get to the bottom of some things:

Nutella, their interactions look good. LC was doing a lot of buddying/+1ing this game, and I think he was targeting civs.
Timmer, looks OK.
Kara, looks....meh? here. The "if Owner turns up scum" interaction is a plus. Goofing on Kara about her name looks funky given Long Con's Jack interaction proves he's not above goofing with teammates in the thread. Kara's the only one left alive from Long Con's big Veritiserum post apart from me, and everyone who has flipped from that has flipped civ.
Colin, I think this clears Colin IMO. LC trial baloons a Colin suspicion pretty early, then says Colin "looks strong", then votes the guy? IDK.
Luna looks great RE: LC


Long Con's ISO, as I've been over the 1000th time, looks Mondo Primo Garbo for Sloonei/Owner. Multiple instances of him protecting/defending Sloonei/Owner with his vote and posts. #14 is perhaps the silver bullet in Owner/Sloonei's favor though given Long Con's pattern of glomping onto and buddying civs this game.

speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 4:50 pm Sorry Long Con. You were a terrible lynch option.

timmer wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 4:40 pm That longer post has me a bit more confused now. What was lc saying, ultimately?

timmer wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 4:36 pm Today, day 3, lc said this:

"I have found Colin's play pretty strong so far, and I have no intention of voting him because I can create a theory about his strange request that shows him as bad. Like I said, that wasn't the purpose of my post - to vilify Colin. I want him to respond to it before I decide anything.

I don't really have any suspicion of Colin apart from it."

I mean that's a big endorsement. But then when it seems like Colin will be up for a potential lynch LC votes him.

And LC has posted since then about other things, but hasn't hashed this out. This puts him above the others, for me.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 3:44 pm Today has been a rather crappy day phase in general. I'm as much to blame as anyone, as I have had terribly little time to really be here apart from the interactive reads I trudged through. I see stupid cases (e.g. Colin wants to be rezzed or something), and mildly interesting cases that are challenged by concrete town indicators (e.g. Long Con, nutella, Lunalee). I don't think these conflicts are going to be resolved before the deadline, so I am endorsing the lynch a player for whom there ought not be conflict:

sprityo

That's the point of what I've done. That's why. I don't give even the slightest sliver of a fraction of a shit how easy it looks. People keep ignoring me anyway, so it isn't even easy.

speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 2:42 pm This is Yun Qui nutella but without the unbreakable townread on anyone. Is it not?

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 2:39 pm

Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 2:36 pm

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 2:33 pm I trust Long Con less than I did when the day began. Whatever doubts I have stem from here. Someone argue with those points while I am in class.

But you said nice things about me in that post.

Right. Those are doubts about lynching you.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 2:33 pm I trust Long Con less than I did when the day began. Whatever doubts I have stem from here. Someone argue with those points while I am in class.

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 2:30 pm

Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 2:20 pm Well, you aren't reading that closely if you think I talked about Timmer's posts being flakey or wishy-washy. Read again and highlight.

I may have read that a bit too quickly and responded a bit too quickly. Digesting it a bit more here's what I come away with:

- Forget the Adolf Tell thing, I saw the green/red positive negative in your post and that flipped a switch for me, but that's not accurate.

- Re-Reading it, your smaller post is you talking yourself in a bit of a circle trying to fit into Mac's thinking RE: the Tell. You specifically cite Timmer's "there may be something to the dead not flipping correctly" post, but then admit that it's probably nothing based on your own "spin". Then your big post is you looking through Timmer's posts for positive/negative stuff. You start off civ reading for the most part, and then at the bottom you find a post that "has some positive/negative contrasts", but you qualify THAT by putting context on it. You end thinking Timmer looks "legit".

nutella wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 2:23 pm

Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 2:11 pm It's not because I'm bad,

So what is?

Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 2:16 pm

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 2:13 pm #3 - LC, you did a big ol' post about how flakey/wishy-washy Timmer's posts were, and how he was trying to say something that everyone could agree with. And then you backed off of it.

I was drinking last night, but I think that wasn't me. Get me on your page here, please.

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 2:13 pm #3 - LC, you did a big ol' post about how flakey/wishy-washy Timmer's posts were, and how he was trying to say something that everyone could agree with. And then you backed off of it.

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 1:20 pm

speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 1:16 pm

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 12:55 pm Long Con:

Spoiler: show

D1 - Fun, Goofy, Aloofy. Some mechanics talk, Defensive about his mechanics talk, Defends Owner over the DH/DA distinction saying he too mixed them up. Reads TH/Luna as W/W. Votes TH, Looking for Hallows.

D2 - Uses Nova's Death to ping Jay immediately. Agrees w/ Jay about Bullz nova vote. Big post detailing thoughts on Luna. Defends Owner again, but agrees that Epi is a null read.

This jumps out at me. Here LC is talking to Kara about Kara's Day 1 Owner suspicion(s) but lack of an Owner vote:

If Owner turns up scum, then that looks bad on you: to say she really looks like scum, but stop short of casting a clinching vote for an Owner lynch.

This quote here really gets my dogs barking. Setting up a patsy for "If Owner [ever] flips scum" combined with LC's defending Owner a few times already...

How strong does your case feel if Slowner is town?

Well considering his defense of Owner, and his jumping on Kara with the "if Owner is scum" thing and his thought that Sloonei townslipped, if you take all those away I still don't like his

1) Hunting for Hallows/TH vote
2) Backing off Luna based on Jay/Nut
3) His flip on Timmer with the Adolf tell or w/e that he backed away from pretty quckly felt like he was working a bit too hard to make something click there.

So I'd say I feel (right now, all things included) 65-70% confident in the LC case, but take the Owner stuff out and I'm somewhere in the range of 55-60%

speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 12:50 pm

nutella wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 12:49 pm

ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 10:07 am

Long Con wrote: ↑Sun Nov 04, 2018 10:07 pm Maybe he wants the perks that come with being a Confirmed Civ. He could reasonably expect protection from kills. I don't know, it's pretty weird. I'm sure the Phoenix Down owner has a plan, no need to "lynch a Civ" to get a good target. Maybe he's a baddie with the ability to appear Civ upon their lynch. Get lynched - look Civ - use up rez - PROFIT!!!

Bingo. If I die then you know I’m a civ and if I come back, that’s good. Is this hard to understand?

Did you... did you misread LC's post? O.o

I think he's agreeing and then directing his question at the naysayers.

nutella wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 12:49 pm

ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 10:07 am

Long Con wrote: ↑Sun Nov 04, 2018 10:07 pm Maybe he wants the perks that come with being a Confirmed Civ. He could reasonably expect protection from kills. I don't know, it's pretty weird. I'm sure the Phoenix Down owner has a plan, no need to "lynch a Civ" to get a good target. Maybe he's a baddie with the ability to appear Civ upon their lynch. Get lynched - look Civ - use up rez - PROFIT!!!

Bingo. If I die then you know I’m a civ and if I come back, that’s good. Is this hard to understand?

Did you... did you misread LC's post? O.o

ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 12:33 pm If I am going to get lynched by the dumbest wagon ever in my time of playing Mafia then at least please answer this q before I go join my great friend Turbup Head in the, uhh, Mirror of Erised? I don’t fucking know you tell me.

ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Sun Nov 04, 2018 4:47 pm Hypothetically assuming I used a Niffler, is it pro-town to share the results? Please weigh in on this and thank you.

ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 10:07 am

Long Con wrote: ↑Sun Nov 04, 2018 10:07 pm Maybe he wants the perks that come with being a Confirmed Civ. He could reasonably expect protection from kills. I don't know, it's pretty weird. I'm sure the Phoenix Down owner has a plan, no need to "lynch a Civ" to get a good target. Maybe he's a baddie with the ability to appear Civ upon their lynch. Get lynched - look Civ - use up rez - PROFIT!!!

Bingo. If I die then you know I’m a civ and if I come back, that’s good. Is this hard to understand?

MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 2:31 am

timmer wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 2:27 am So Mac, what I'm telling you is that there was no vig kill night 1. So who killed a bad nova? That's my issue. Both nights, multiple kills. Both nights, dead baddies. But NOT both nights vig killa so who killed them. And if it is someone unknown is it just weird odds that their kills were bad?

Serial killers also don't generally kill quiet players from what I can glean. Mafia sometimes do but not serial killers.

But, for that kill to have been outright a civilian I would need to believe that the town has three vigilantes, two of which hit Mafia.

That would need some powerful (or numerable) Mafia roles to counteract it no?

Night 1 - You vigged, someone else used a vig and the serial killer kills on even nights maybe? I dunno.

MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 2:28 am How could it make you doubt the lynches?

I am questioning the flips of the dead, which quite frankly we don't usually get on TS anyway.

MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 2:26 am So it would appear in light of Timmer's revelation that we have three non Mafia killing roles.

Sucks to be Mafia.

MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 2:24 am The false flip thing was just an outlandish theory of mine. I shared with you an outlandish theory and it's apparently unacceptable to do so. Okay fine. I will play the game your way.

MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 2:17 am

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 2:16 am

MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 2:11 am

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 2:08 am Am I nuts or is "Maybe the guys who are flipping bad are actually good" Not a civilian-minded conspiracy theory? What is even the point here? How has this become the hot topic of the day?

Since when do we have two dead Mafia on day 3 with zero having been lynched? It's like a metaphor for society in general right now.

Why are you acting like it's impossible for civilians to do things right?

Jeez that's a leap of logic.

timmer wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 1:58 am

nutella wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 12:51 am wait timmer what the fuck is your job

when someone has an infection and a surgeon cuts the infected tissue out of them, like in a knee joint or an abscess or a bursa, that tissue comes to me. I grind it into pulp with a mortar and pestle and then take that pulp and culture it to see what bacteria is in it. That then tells the surgeon what antibiotics the person should be on to heal the area and to keep them from going septic.

timmer wrote: ↑Sun Nov 04, 2018 1:40 am I'm struggling to pst what I wantto say properly, I'm a bit lit.

I'll write it better tomorrow but I'm hot liking long con s vote history and vote timing... I think it is vey possible he saved owner day 1. I think his inh vote needs more study too. He's been very manipulative with his voting strategy and his early stated aim to be hallow hunting makes for easy cover for those late votes

I'll try to lay it out better tomorrow

timmer wrote: ↑Sun Nov 04, 2018 1:07 am I've begun staring at the polls for awhile now, slightly drunk on port...

The deathly Hallows cannot be transferred, it says.

Do you think a baddie could have started with a hallow?

timmer wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 3:55 pm

Lunalee wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 3:51 pm

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 3:47 pm

Lunalee wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 3:46 pm

Kylemii wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 3:44 pm the difference between this game and the last game as far as number of opinions from me goes is that in the previous game the few opinions I had were confident and also correct with little basis required up until maybe like day six.

I defended players I knew were civs and voted for my own teammates because I could, and because it was easy, and it made me seem trustworthy to basically everyone except long con. In this game I have few opinions because I've only read like 1/3 of the pages

Did Kylemii just scum-slip?

whaddya mean

He gives a comparison:
Last game (scum): confident opinions, defended players who were civ, voted for his teammates, acted trustworthy
This game (unknown): I have few opinions because I haven't been around.
Not: I have few opinions because I'm town.

So... Ugh... Luna, is that a serious case? Like, you legit think his word choice here is a scumslip? Or is this a desperate attempt at a case to take pressure off of you...

timmer wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 3:52 pm

Lunalee wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 3:40 pm

timmer wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 3:36 pm

Lunalee wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 3:28 pm

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 1:52 pm Lunalee, I am unclear why you are suspicious of karavalenge. If you've already explained in detail just direct me that way, or please do so now. It strikes me as a very easy selection (as does Bullzeye).

See my response to Timmer. I suspected Kara, but then found a post of theirs that made me want to back off. That's why I moved my vote to Bullzeye instead. As far as Bullzeye being an "easy" selection, that may be true. And if that's the case I don't want to join an opportunistic band wagon. I'll be around for the next hour or so and hope to have a confident vote by then.

But you've said previously that you think there is at least some thread/game evidence to support a bullzeye lunch, so if you believe in it, why be hesitant about your vote just because it may also appear opportunistic? I mean, if you think he's bad... why would you move your votr, potentially?

See, I'm hesitant because if Bullz is civ, and he just came in a voted Nova at EOD because he was absent, and there was no other reasons to it, then after Nova flipped scum, there's this nice opportunity to build a case against Bullz, and mafia might jump all over that.

Right, so I guess what I'm getting at is... which do you think it is? Is bullz a civ who came in late and lazy-voted and the baddies will attack it? Or do you think he was bad? You seem to want to vote him, but also not? I'm confused.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 1:40 am [VOTE: sprityo] aubergine

This is the one option for which I feel exclusively comfortable.

timmer wrote: ↑Sun Nov 04, 2018 8:47 pm Skimming through to catch up... Mac's focus on the chance that we are not in fact down two dead baddies is interesting, to say the least, but I'm not sure where to go with it . I'll admit I'm at a loss in the game right now... my suspicions have flopped, my thoughts on lc last night make no sense to me now, I'm going to watch the pats/packers game and then regroup later tonight.

poutanko wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 1:02 am @Long ConPoint out which posts of his that look good to you. You didn't even think about how weird him vouching for Bullz just like that? Why?

nutella wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 12:58 am Take note everybody, LC likes to send his finger to malodorous locations

poutanko wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 12:52 am

Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 12:49 am

timmer wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 12:39 am K, so my Pat's game is over, so I can get back to this.

Guys, I always write the way I write in this game. I don't like to push ideas if I'm unsure of them, so I always make clear that I'm unsure. It's how ive always posted in mafia. So if you are going to lynch me for it, honestly I'm prob done for good. This is the very reason ive gone such long stretches without playing, this happens every fucking time.

And long con, really? That post of mine that you said you found troublesome? I was describing my job. I was at work. Its what I do.

I'm sorry I have no major ideas to push. I'm clearly not cut out for this.

The only useful thing I can tell you is that there really may be something to the idea that the dead baddies aren't necessarily bad. And there may be a serial killer attached to it.

Duuude, I was kidding around. I'm not going to vote you because you are a psycho killer in REAL LIFE. This is Mafia.

Seriously, that wasn't me coming after you. Like I said after reading your ISO, I don't suspect you.

Explain how?

nutella wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 12:45 am

timmer wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 12:39 am
The only useful thing I can tell you is that there really may be something to the idea that the dead baddies aren't necessarily bad. And there may be a serial killer attached to it.

Do you have specific reasons for this speculation?