I'm dead? Someone killed me? That is by far the worst welcome I have ever received. Triple H, you obviously missed 'Hospitality 101'
It's been fun while it lasted . I find it poetic that Vomp who I didn't care whether he lived or died, died with me. I guess I got my punishment
Search found 85 matches
Return to “WWE MAFIA - Day 14”
- Wed Dec 25, 2013 3:10 am
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: WWE MAFIA - Day 14
- Replies: 3141
- Views: 78250
- Tue Dec 24, 2013 6:32 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: WWE MAFIA - Day 14
- Replies: 3141
- Views: 78250
Re: WWE MAFIA - Night 3
This is very helpful, thank you. Because I don't know 75% of the players and half are barely playing.MovingPictures07 wrote:Here we go!! Wow, this took a LONG time. Players' names in red are ones I feel I need to re-read all of their posts to re-assess.
A Person - Slightly leaning civvie - Has had some good insights, mostly in the beginning of the game. Despite that, his behavior has been a bit defiant and seemingly purposefully nontraditional, although nothing particularly uncharacteristic. I would like to hear a bit more from him, but he hasn't set off any alarm bells from me at all, and he did survive that D1 lynch, which could mean anything (but more possibilities suggest a civvie explanation). I don't know him and while I see no reason to suspect him, I honestly don't get what he brings to the table from that kind of play. Now you reminded me, he's the person that was lynched and the lynch didn't go through. I really can't read him because I think he's making it his job to be hard to read
Bass_the_Clever - Slightly leaning baddie - His randomized vote for Daisy on D1 combined with his bandwagon votes for Mongoose and Russ make me wonder about him, as he seems to be just trying to blend in. But I've only played one other game with him and his recent response to why he voted Mongoose seemed genuine. The blending in is what I'm getting from him. Saying we need to consider low posters is a given yet an easy way out, so it doesn't help in any way. Those sort of comments make me suspicious
Boomslang - Somewhat slightly leaning civvie - Posting at about a normal frequency and with typical commentary that I would expect from him. No reason to believe he's bad, but hardly any particular reason to believe he's civvie either. I have nothing. Don't remember anything from him.
Bullzeye - Firmly leaning civvie - Has been posting with frequency and insight that I would expect from him. Can be a really tricksy baddie, but I don't have any reason to believe he's doing that here. Seems reasonable and I believe he is genuinely civvie-minded. might be the person I feel is most civvie. He's posts come off as genuine, I like the way he's thinking most of the time, and even when I don't agree with his suspicions, I get where they are coming from
Captain Bunny Killer - ?????? - Can't tell at all. She has hardly posted, but I know she was with me all this past weekend and has been really busy spending time with family. Not much mafia experience to base an opinion off of, since she's only played one game and subbed out of another. She didn't post much in Homestar, but she did become more comfortable as the game winded down. Don't remember much from her, but I assume that if this is indeed her first game, if she is a baddie, her team would encourage her to post more.
Devin the Omniscient - Slightly leaning civvie - Seems to be playing a style that is really similar to his performance in Homestar Runner. I firmly believed him to be civvie earlier on in the game based on: this fact (that he is acting like his civvie self, not his baddie self), his responses to people bringing him up (seemed like genuine frustration), but I find myself questioning. I don't understand why he bandwagoned onto Mongoose and now seems to be gunning for Epig and S~V~S, but I know he is really busy and seems very distracted/frustrated to me.I think it is Devin that asked to be lynched. I questioned him on that, and his responses made me feel much better about him. It felt like a frustrated civ. I can see a baddie saying lynch me for trusting Epig and hoping to get people to think that a baddie wouldn't ask to be lynched. Because let's face it, we usually don't lynch people who ask to be lynched. Still, leaning toward civvie.
DisgruntledPorcupine - Slightly leaning baddie - Has been pretty absent, although I have certainly seen him do this before. I would say he is ?????, but the fact that he did bandwagon onto Mongoose does strike me as unlike civvie DP.I don't remember anything from him, but I think someone brought him up. Maybe Bullzeye when trying to look at the people who voted Mongoose. I think it made me think DP's reasoning for voting her were scummy, so I'll agree on that. But I hope I'm referring to the right person
Dom - ????? - Voted for him on Day 1 because I thought he subtly pushed the suspicion against Mongoose without appearing too obvious. His response seemed legit. He's actually completely fallen off my radar since for some reason, and now I'm left just really unsure about him. I forgot he's playing. I remember he was a lot more active when the game started, and now, I didn't even remember him. I usually tend to think that baddies find it a lot easier to be more active in the beginning when they don't have to explain their actions, so maybe there's something there
Elohcin - Slightly leaning civvie - Seems like her normal civvie self and Epig vouches for her, and I think Epig is civvie. I would like to hear more from her, but I do know she's busy and in two mafia games. I didn't like her vote, but there are others whose votes I didn't like. And I can't argue with Epig's instincts on this, and even if he's not a civvie, I can see him saying she's good to get on her good side and make it look like he's a civ
Epignosis - Firmly leaning civvie - Was very unsure at first since Epig is always aggressive regardless of alignment, but I have become convinced more over time that I am likely seeing a civvie Epig. Seems very focused on scumhunting, questioning of others' intentions, and civvie-minded. This might be our biggest dispute. I know I don't know him, but from seeing him host the other game and how creative it is, plus from what I've seen from him so far, it seems as though he's a gutsy, crazy, will do the unconventional things in the game, kind of player. Out of everyone here, he's the one I can see leading two lynches no matter the consequences, hoping we'd think he wouldn't do that if he were a baddie. Plus, he seems like a smart guy and it's not often smart guys lead civvie's lynches two consecutive days
FZ. - Somewhat slightly leaning baddie - Seems very reasonable and focused, and I often find myself agreeing with her, but for some reason I doubt her civvieness. I can't shake the feeling that she could be manipulating and I find myself thinking that the difference between this FZ and the civvie one I saw on KSite is attributable to a difference in alignment. What can I say? You're wrong. Moreover, I think I can tell you that in the game on Ksite, after I was lynched and was still reading the game and trying to figure out for myself who the scum were, I told K4J that you were too good to be true because your thought process seemed so much like mine. I still see it. Look at how many of the people on your list resemble what I wrote before. That's why most of the time I think you're a civvie. So it bothers me that you think I might be bad, but I can't do any more than what I'm doing
Hedgeowl - ????? - Very hard to tell since she replaced in recently, but so far I suppose she seems like a normal Hedgeowl trying to approach the game a bit differently, and what that says about her alignment.... your guess is as good as mine. I know K4J disagrees with me on this, but I think that Jenny wouldn't ask to be replaced had she been a baddie. She likes being a baddie more than a civ, and I think she would find it easier to cope with a group pushing her to stay in the game. Moreover, I see nothing suspicious from Hedge so far
kneel4justice - Firmly leaning civvie - Reads genuine to me, seems very active in scumhunting. Would be shocked if he flipped baddie at this point. leaning on agreeing with you, but never say never with K4J Still, most of the time, I think I'm pretty good at recognizing him when he's a regular civ, and this seems like one of those times
Lizzy - Slightly leaning baddie - Her behavior has been 'normal' Lizzy, whatever that means, since she is an excellent player who likes to constantly shift up her avant-garde gameplay. She did ping me with her vote for Mongoose. Actually, she is someone I need to revisit. Don't know what I can say about her more than I've said in the other game. Do you see any differences between the two? Someone said she was more vocal here, maybe that's true, though you can't really call her vocal either way
LouLou26 - Somewhat slightly leaning baddie - Is quieter and more subdued than the Lou I am used to, but I can't tell why that is. Similar to FZ, I can't shake the feeling that she could be manipulating and I find myself thinking that the difference between this Lou and the civvie one I saw on KSite is attributable to a difference in alignment. Maybe what I'm seeing from Lou is what you're seeing from me. That's why I hesitate in my suspicions of her, not to mention, she'll tell you I'm always suspicious of her. But she is quieter and not bringing much to the table right now. Also, she voted for someone other than Russ, which on it's own is good, yet I don't remember her saying why she's not going with him
Mister Rearranger - Firmly leaning civvie - This seems like civvie MR to me: questioning, insightful, actively hunting. He seems a bit different than how I perceived him in the other game. Maybe that's why he got lynched there. But he seems less wacky here. Maybe more careful, or laying low. Not sure though. Some posts do seem genuine
MovingPictures07 - 100% leaning civvie - Yep! Wouldn't give you a 100, but a 75
reywaS/BWT 2.0 - ????? - Has not been around, BWT just replaced in, but he hasn't said anything yet. no idea
Sorsha - ????? - S~V~S's thoughts combined with what I know of Sorsha indicate to me that she is still 'warming up' in this game and, despite her initial "I'm a civvie" comment and her recent frustrated posts, and her Mongoose vote, I really just can't tell on her one way or the other. I'm afraid that it may be too "easy" to vote for her, ironically in light of her recent vote for Vompatti. agree
Spacedaisy - ????? - My girlfriend hasn't posted much, but I know she's been really busy, and this is normal for her posting frequency anymore for quite some time now. I haven't seen anything from her that is abnormal, but I can't really tell yet one way or the other on her alignment. Did she even post? you're doing enough talking for both of you
Summer - Somewhat slightly leaning civvie - Seems reasonable, helpful, but I did seriously question her intentions earlier in the game and thought she seemed particularly noncommittal, despite her insistence that she is a committal player. I haven't played a game with her before as she is helping to host the current KSite game I'm in, but her responses have been logical and genuine. except for a minute in the start of the game, where I thought she was trying a little too hard, I see civvie Summer.
SVS - Somewhat slightly leaning baddie - I believe she was incredibly opportunistic with Mongoose and was manipulating the thread, and I was pinged by her sudden suspicion of me after I started voicing suspicions of her, but after her more recent responses and sitting on it, I am not so sure anymore, with my original gut feeling on her almost all but obliterated. I have been lately feeling she is genuine and I am not so sure this is aggressive baddie S~V~S. She actually has had some good insight as well. I still wonder if there was something to my initial reaction, but I don't know. I've said what I have on SVS. I understand your concern as well as hesitation
Turnip Head - Slightly leaning civvie - It's been a long time since I've gotten to play with TH, but he seems like what I remember of his civvie self here -- down to business, reasonable. He and I were on the same page re: Mongoose and I feel he has had great insight. He is one HELL of a baddie though. I really look forward to seeing what else he has to say. He's someone I forgot to add earlier of the people I trust. Seemed genuinely frustrated with people not doing their part in scum hunting and has give some good thoughts himself
Vompatti - ????? - Criminally insane, just can't tell on him this game. I've seen civvie contributions from him in other games, but I've also seen him play like this as a civvie and seen him be a bit more active as baddie too, so... No idea. I don't care
wrathofgod - Slightly leaning SK - She has literally not been around, the only person not to post even once. However, we saw no SK kill on Nights 1 and 2, so she may just be that role. Unfortunately, this would be her first mafia game, but I know she has been really busy. good point, no idea
Zany Dex - ????? - A complete enigma not too far off Devin and Vompatti. He hasn't posted much at all, but I know he is sometimes really quiet in games. He did vote for Mongoose. May be trying to avoid suspicion by flying under the radar, or maybe is just really busy. I don't even remember what it was that caught my eye. I'd say I'll check, but I would be lying, Lol
Wow, that was actually sort of cathartic, and made me realize where I need to look harder. I definitely have too many question marks or "somewhat slightly" leanings.
Now I have to go and actually do something with my holiday downtime that ISN'T mafia, so see you folks later! Next step is to revisit these thoughts, see what others have to say in my absence, and see what happens at night.
I don't have time to go over everyone's post not to mention I'm too lazy for that. I don't get people who can do that. Takes too much energy, sorry. So if I actually remember a player and things he said, I'm commenting near your thoughts in pink. I hope it answers your questions for me in another post
- Tue Dec 24, 2013 3:06 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: WWE MAFIA - Day 14
- Replies: 3141
- Views: 78250
Re: WWE MAFIA - Night 3
I need to go but I just looked at the list, and wow, there are too many people that I don't even remember them saying anything. That's really bad.
- Tue Dec 24, 2013 3:04 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: WWE MAFIA - Day 14
- Replies: 3141
- Views: 78250
Re: WWE MAFIA - Night 3
You didn't really offend me, don't worry, haha. It was a figure of speech.MovingPictures07 wrote:First off, so sorry for offending you. I would never mean anything of the sort. I suppose it was worded really badly; I wasn't trying to say you don't do things with your vote, I guess I was just emotionally reacting a bit there and it showed in my wording because it's so easy for people to come back in after the fact and finger point at those who helped lynch an innocent especially when they had no part in it and I felt you were doing that, like the father scolding the son.FZ. wrote: This post actually made me feel better about you again. I had a momentary concern, but since I actually get most of your suspicions, I feel better.
I admit, I didn't get the suspicion for Russ. There was a moment there where I accused him of blaming Epi for his vote (I think it was Russ), but later on, everything he said just felt genuine. And when I see people not seeing what I think is obvious, it makes me concerned about them.
As for me pointing fingers at people who "actually try to do something with their votes", I'm kind of offended here. First, I try to do things with my vote. It's not my fault people don't follow me here. When I left for bed, no one had more than 2 votes at most, and I believe Russ had none or maybe 1. I had hoped things would go a different way. I would have preferred to lynch Vopm or A person for their lack of contribution which is done on purpose than to lynch Russ.
Also, I'd rather people think I'm suspicious for not voting someone I believe is a civ than actually lynch a civ. That's me. I guess if I were scum, I might act differently.
I have noticed that you come off more aggressive in this game than how I saw you on Ksite. Can you explain it?
Regarding AP and Vomps, do you actually think they're both baddies or what are you thinking there?
As for AP and Vomp, I can't tell if they are bad or not, but the way they are playing is annoying the hell out of me, and not only aren't they helping the civs, they are making it harder. So if I had to decide between a person that I'm not really sure about voting for, or one of them, I'd get rid of them in a flash. The reason I can't read them is because basically they are giving nothing. Vomp even less than AP. I'd just lynch them every game until they started acting differently
This is exactly how I'm feeling this game, so I can definitely relate.MovingPictures07 wrote: As to coming off more aggressive, well, let's just say this is the true me. Lol. But it's a combination of factors: (1) I feel most at home here; (2) I know pretty much every single player in some way, shape, or form, and some of them really well, and on KSite it was near the opposite of that, with the exception of those I brought with me; (3) the KSite game started when I was on vacation in Phoenix for almost a week and the timing couldn't have been any worse on that front -- combined with how INSANELY much people were posting so early on in the game, it was very overwhelming, and I didn't feel I was in my comfort zone.
Ah, that will be really hard because I still haven't figured who is who with half the people, but I'll give it a try.MovingPictures07 wrote:
So, I'm curious, and just because it's a KSite tradition, think you can come up with one of those list things that K4J posted?
I can tell you that I think I trust Bullzeye, you, K4J, Devin. I guess I'll believe Epi in his trust for Elo, even if I'm not sure he is a civ. Hedge seems OK at the moment.
People I'm worried about: SVS, Epig, Bass (I think that's him), Lizzie, Zany dex, Lou a little...and I can't remember who else is playing.
I'll try going over the list later and sort through my thoughts
- Tue Dec 24, 2013 11:48 am
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: WWE MAFIA - Day 14
- Replies: 3141
- Views: 78250
Re: WWE MAFIA - Night 3
In regard to the people from ksite:MovingPictures07 wrote: Yes, true re: BWT. That means he very likely was a baddie replacing into the same baddie team or he was a civvie with no BTSC/info role. I'm leaning towards the latter.
Where did this KSite stuff come from? What do you mean by block voting? I got lost there.
But anyway, you do have a decent point regarding the KSite game... I would like to see what the KSiters think about each other right now given everything that has transpired thus far.
Personally, what I'm currently thinking is...
K4J - Very likely civvie
FZ. - No idea, maybe slightly baddie, but I haven't really thought about her
Lou - Same as FZ
Summer - Was leaning slightly baddie earlier, now maybe slightly civvie... Not sure
Which means I'm really not sure what the heck's going on with any of them... except K4J. And maybe he IS bad, but if he is bad, then IMO he deserves to win with the way he's playing because he's coming across genuine as hell to me this past cycle.
K4J comes off as a civ to me, but K4J is a very very good player, and having two scum teams which is something we usually don't have on ksite, makes it much easier for him to appear genuine and trying to find scum. He's usually pretty good at finding scum, so I'm actually surprised he went with Russ. Then again, if he were a baddie, he'd want to deliver a baddie in the lynch, so I'm going to assume for now, it's just an honest mistake. Just don't let him off that easily. He's someone to keep an eye on.
FZ- that's me. 100% civ
Lou- Finding it hard to read her this game. She's not how I would expect her to act and flying under the radar, but this is a different site, and different circumstances, so maybe that's why she feels like that. I'm not getting any strong baddie vibe.
Summer- I feel like she's a civ.
I'm trying to focus on figuring out the players I don't know and that's taking a hell of a lot of my energy and time...
- Tue Dec 24, 2013 11:41 am
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: WWE MAFIA - Day 14
- Replies: 3141
- Views: 78250
Re: WWE MAFIA - Night 3
This post actually made me feel better about you again. I had a momentary concern, but since I actually get most of your suspicions, I feel better.MovingPictures07 wrote:Wow, that is TERRIBLE. So sorry Russ, RIP.
Elo's reasons for voting may be a cop out, but she's acted like this time and time again in games and been lynched and come up civvie time and time again, often led by me, so I am really hesitant on that front. So when Epig vouches for her, considering his near 100% track record on her, combined with the fact she seems like her civvie self to me, then I don't see a reason to vote that way for the time being.FZ. wrote:
Looking at people who voted for Russ, there are a few who have really fishy reasons. I've trusted MP for most of the game so far, but he gave too many reasons for his vote, and it made me think he's aiming to please. I got all the hesitation, I just didn't get the final decision to vote for Russ. If anything, between the two he contemplated, I'd have gone for Sorsha.
Sorry you didn't like my vote, and it turns out I hate it myself now, but the only two players that had votes hen I voted were Sorsha and Russ, and Sorsha's behavior is much more par for the course from her, and I had to vote someone -- I just really didn't know what to do. You're right, maybe I should have voted Sorsha, maybe she should go tomorrow. You were all gung ho to vote for SVS and yet you didn't vote that way, then you come back and point fingers at the players who actually tried to do something with their votes.
Despite Hedge's route of going with the top players, I'm beginning to suspect that it's possible many of our baddies are specifically avoiding the bandwagons (ESPECIALLY this past vote, Mongoose maybe not as much) so that they avoid the limelight. It's possible we do have a baddie or two among the top posters, but looking at them... I am not so sure. If Epig, MR, and K4J are bad, then they're doing a FANTASTIC job because currently I lean towards believing every single one of them. I don't even know what to think about S~V~S anymore.
I can't believe there were TEN players who didn't vote. What the hell is that?
Linkitis with SVS
I admit, I didn't get the suspicion for Russ. There was a moment there where I accused him of blaming Epi for his vote (I think it was Russ), but later on, everything he said just felt genuine. And when I see people not seeing what I think is obvious, it makes me concerned about them.
As for me pointing fingers at people who "actually try to do something with their votes", I'm kind of offended here. First, I try to do things with my vote. It's not my fault people don't follow me here. When I left for bed, no one had more than 2 votes at most, and I believe Russ had none or maybe 1. I had hoped things would go a different way. I would have preferred to lynch Vopm or A person for their lack of contribution which is done on purpose than to lynch Russ.
Also, I'd rather people think I'm suspicious for not voting someone I believe is a civ than actually lynch a civ. That's me. I guess if I were scum, I might act differently.
I have noticed that you come off more aggressive in this game than how I saw you on Ksite. Can you explain it?
- Tue Dec 24, 2013 11:32 am
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: WWE MAFIA - Day 14
- Replies: 3141
- Views: 78250
Re: WWE MAFIA - Night 3
Before I went to bed last night, K4J said that maybe us 4 could agree on someone to lynch. I'm not sure all of us are civs but if people could agree with me on who to lynch, I don't care who it is, and maybe because we know each other, and the logic we use, it could be easier. I thought K4J would think about what I said on Russ and not vote, and maybe follow on Elo. He did question Elo, but I get it that Epig vouching for her made him rethink that.S~V~S wrote:
Also, why would you expect people to block vote that way? Do you think all the Ksiters are civs? From a strictly statistical standpoint, at least one of you is probably bad. How are you so sure you can all trust each other? I am interested in this personally as well, becasue I found that the place I was a biggest fail at the Ksite game was the fact that i found myself ONLY suspecting the people I knew after the Onox lynch, because it was easy to do that. I found it much harder to trust them than to distrust them.
There is no 4 Ksiters block.
- Tue Dec 24, 2013 11:27 am
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: WWE MAFIA - Day 14
- Replies: 3141
- Views: 78250
Re: WWE MAFIA - Night 3
I'll Pm youBullzeye wrote:Where are you from, if you don't mind me asking? That is exactly how I feel playing in the UK, polls very rarely end before midnight and I always feel compelled to stay up. Not with this game though, I don't love anyone here enough to stay awake until 6 am.FZ. wrote: Apparently, I can't be part of an actual lynch because people vote when I'm asleep. I told you Russ seemed pretty OK to me. If you don't trust my instincts anymore, that's fine.
Given his discussion for most of the day I'd kinda expected MP to go for SVS. He did say what he'd seen from Sorsha is what he thinks is normal civ behaviour for her as well, so if he'd put a vote on her that would actually have made me kinda suspicious.Looking at people who voted for Russ, there are a few who have really fishy reasons. I've trusted MP for most of the game so far, but he gave too many reasons for his vote, and it made me think he's aiming to please. I got all the hesitation, I just didn't get the final decision to vote for Russ. If anything, between the two he contemplated, I'd have gone for Sorsha.
I don't know what to think of SVS and MP. I just read his recent post, and I'm back to thinking he's a civ. And yeah, I change my mind.
As for SVS, some of the things actions seem really suspicious, but then she talks and it sounds genuine. So I actually get MP's hesitance if it's real. I'm feeling it too. The only game I played with him, the baddies killed me early on, but I felt the same way I'm feeling about MP as I do now. I felt that a lot of the things he was feeling, were the same as me.
Sorsha is the kind of player that if they turn out scum, I'd be disappointed. I hate when baddies do things that are too obvious scummy. Like vote without giving good reasons, or laying low and trying to blend in. That's my blind spot. I expect baddies to be clever and not obvious. But sometimes they are obvious, and I miss it. So this could be the case. You all know her better. How is she when scum?
- Tue Dec 24, 2013 8:23 am
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: WWE MAFIA - Day 14
- Replies: 3141
- Views: 78250
Re: WWE MAFIA - Night 3
Merry Christmas to all those celebrating it
- Tue Dec 24, 2013 3:40 am
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: WWE MAFIA - Day 14
- Replies: 3141
- Views: 78250
Re: WWE MAFIA - Night 3
Edit: "we *weren't* going to lynch him"
I'm working from home today, so I'm going to be around on and off
I'm working from home today, so I'm going to be around on and off
- Tue Dec 24, 2013 3:37 am
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: WWE MAFIA - Day 14
- Replies: 3141
- Views: 78250
Re: WWE MAFIA - Night 3
Oh, and to answer your question, what gave me the impression we won't going to lynch him was your post before I went to sleep saying maybe us Ksiters could agree on a person to lynch, and since I did not agree on Russ, I thought you were going to drop it.kneel4justice wrote:I was just sitting here waiting for your disapproving post.FZ. wrote:Damn it! I thought when I left, that we weren't going to vote for Russ. What the hell happened?
I don't know why you'd leave thinking that people weren't going to vote for him, I really do not get that. Whatever gave you that impression..
Anyways, why don't you step up and be part of an actual lynch? I'd like to see if you can do any better.
- Tue Dec 24, 2013 3:34 am
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: WWE MAFIA - Day 14
- Replies: 3141
- Views: 78250
Re: WWE MAFIA - Night 3
And I'm still bothered by SVS, but if like she claims, she doesn't play logically, maybe she's one of those I'm not going to be able to read properly. I think I'm better at detecting civvies than I am baddies, lol.
- Tue Dec 24, 2013 3:30 am
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: WWE MAFIA - Day 14
- Replies: 3141
- Views: 78250
Re: WWE MAFIA - Night 3
Well, I hope I deliveredkneel4justice wrote:I was just sitting here waiting for your disapproving post.FZ. wrote:Damn it! I thought when I left, that we weren't going to vote for Russ. What the hell happened?
I don't know why you'd leave thinking that people weren't going to vote for him, I really do not get that. Whatever gave you that impression..
Anyways, why don't you step up and be part of an actual lynch? I'd like to see if you can do any better.
Apparently, I can't be part of an actual lynch because people vote when I'm asleep. I told you Russ seemed pretty OK to me. If you don't trust my instincts anymore, that's fine.
Every one is obviously looking for baddies to make themselves look goo. So I believe most people when they accuse someone else, that they think that person is really suspicious. Which would obviously make it harder for the lie detector...
I thought Elo's reasons for voting were a cop out, but her husband seems to think she's legit and everyone is trusting of that. I can understand. I'd like to think I know my husband well enough to know when he's lying.
Looking at people who voted for Russ, there are a few who have really fishy reasons. I've trusted MP for most of the game so far, but he gave too many reasons for his vote, and it made me think he's aiming to please. I got all the hesitation, I just didn't get the final decision to vote for Russ. If anything, between the two he contemplated, I'd have gone for Sorsha.
- Tue Dec 24, 2013 2:47 am
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: WWE MAFIA - Day 14
- Replies: 3141
- Views: 78250
Re: WWE MAFIA - Night 3
Damn it! I thought when I left, that we weren't going to vote for Russ. What the hell happened?
I'll have to go back and see who are the people who voted and why, but I don't have time right now. Still mad though. Can't understand why you lynched him.
I'm trying to think what this could mean in terms of BWT alignment in his previous as well as his current role. I'm too tired to think about it, but I think we can learn something from this, so if anyone has a theory, please share.DFaraday wrote:Also, BWT has agreed to come back, and is replacing reywaS.
I'll have to go back and see who are the people who voted and why, but I don't have time right now. Still mad though. Can't understand why you lynched him.
- Mon Dec 23, 2013 7:46 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: WWE MAFIA - Day 14
- Replies: 3141
- Views: 78250
Re: WWE MAFIA - Day 3
Sorry, I did. I waited for someone to comment, but when I saw no one did, I voted. Too tired to think anymore. I'm torn about Epig. Almost voted for him, but couldn't make up my mind. I'm going to sleep. Think about Elo. It seemed like such an easy way out. Especially at this stage.kneel4justice wrote:Did you vote yet? Maybe us KSITE players can put our heads together. Do you think Epig is a townie?FZ. wrote:I'm pissed. I just missed the lynch in the other game after staying up late and waiting for people to come in and talk or vote. Now I just want to go to sleep and I don't know who to vote for. None of the contributing people, who have votes on them, are ones I feel comfortable voting for, and I don't want my vote to go to waste.
Now, since I think SVS is a baddie in the other game, I'm trying to think maybe I'm wrong about her in this game I'm going to wait with voting for her and go with someone else for today.
I'm going with Elo, because her vote for Devin seems completely out of no where
- Mon Dec 23, 2013 7:37 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: WWE MAFIA - Day 14
- Replies: 3141
- Views: 78250
Re: WWE MAFIA - Day 3
I'm pissed. I just missed the lynch in the other game after staying up late and waiting for people to come in and talk or vote. Now I just want to go to sleep and I don't know who to vote for. None of the contributing people, who have votes on them, are ones I feel comfortable voting for, and I don't want my vote to go to waste.
Now, since I think SVS is a baddie in the other game, I'm trying to think maybe I'm wrong about her in this game I'm going to wait with voting for her and go with someone else for today.
I'm going with Elo, because her vote for Devin seems completely out of no where
Now, since I think SVS is a baddie in the other game, I'm trying to think maybe I'm wrong about her in this game I'm going to wait with voting for her and go with someone else for today.
I'm going with Elo, because her vote for Devin seems completely out of no where
- Mon Dec 23, 2013 5:09 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: WWE MAFIA - Day 14
- Replies: 3141
- Views: 78250
Re: WWE MAFIA - Day 3
Found him. He's looking pretty OK to me.kneel4justice wrote:What do people think about Russ?
- Mon Dec 23, 2013 4:57 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: WWE MAFIA - Day 14
- Replies: 3141
- Views: 78250
Re: WWE MAFIA - Day 3
Who's Russ?kneel4justice wrote:What do people think about Russ?
- Mon Dec 23, 2013 4:31 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: WWE MAFIA - Day 14
- Replies: 3141
- Views: 78250
Re: WWE MAFIA - Day 3
I feel like TH and I are becoming a little rude, and if he's feeling anything like I am, it's coming out of frustration. I can speak for myself when I say, I don't mean to be rude, but I feel like there are some people who are playing just to annoy others. I'd love to know why they are playing, but to each their own. If someone enjoys winning by bringing nothing to the table, that's their prerogative. If that's what you mean by it will pay out in the end, enjoy. My idea of winning is either when you actually contribute to eliminating scum, or if you're a baddie, deceiving people into thinking you are contributing to the town's win. Obviously, it's something completely different for some. I'm just not going to bother, it's taking the fun out of the game. Since I'm new here and you all seem to play like that for some time, who am I to interrupt.
- Mon Dec 23, 2013 3:55 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: WWE MAFIA - Day 14
- Replies: 3141
- Views: 78250
Re: WWE MAFIA - Day 3
I don't find him that magnificent. I think he's a frustrated stand up comedian wanna-be, who can't find a place to spread his not so hilarious jokes, so he's playing mafia....No offenseBoomslang wrote:MovingPictures07 wrote:A Person wrote:he's not wrong thoughVompatti wrote: Civvies send PMs too.
Had to take out my quote, because apparently you can't embed 6 quotes within each other? But this is exactly my point: if you don't know what your role is, you're not going to be sending in appropriate PMs. Also, excellent catch on Sorsha from Bullz; I'll have to check that out further.
Linki: A Person, you magnificent troll :P
- Mon Dec 23, 2013 3:46 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: WWE MAFIA - Day 14
- Replies: 3141
- Views: 78250
Re: WWE MAFIA - Day 3
That's funny coming from the person who voted VompattiVompatti wrote:Turnip Head wrote:Yes... yes I'm aware...Vompatti wrote:Civvies send PMs too.Turnip Head wrote:So if you don't remember if you're a baddie or not, how can you send in your PMs? Does this mean you don't have a role that sends in a power? Or are you missing your PM's?Vompatti wrote:I don't remember if I'm a baddie or not. This has been my strategy from the beginning and I truly believe it will pay out in the end.
That wasn't my point. Are you sending in your PM's at night? Or are you not even bothering because you don't even know your role? Even if you're a civvie and not sending in your PM, you are wasting civilian resources by not doing so.
I can't think of any reason not to vote for Vompatti. Some of you are calling this his "style"... I call it "playing like a boob". I'd much rather lynch Vompatti than lynch someone who is actually playing the game.
As far as I know I haven't missed any PMs yet. I don't mind being lynched but I don't see how you would benefit from lynching me if you were a civ.
- Mon Dec 23, 2013 3:31 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: WWE MAFIA - Day 14
- Replies: 3141
- Views: 78250
Re: WWE MAFIA - Day 3
I can totally relate.Turnip Head wrote:Yes... yes I'm aware...Vompatti wrote:Civvies send PMs too.Turnip Head wrote:So if you don't remember if you're a baddie or not, how can you send in your PMs? Does this mean you don't have a role that sends in a power? Or are you missing your PM's?Vompatti wrote:I don't remember if I'm a baddie or not. This has been my strategy from the beginning and I truly believe it will pay out in the end.
That wasn't my point. Are you sending in your PM's at night? Or are you not even bothering because you don't even know your role? Even if you're a civvie and not sending in your PM, you are wasting civilian resources by not doing so.
I can't think of any reason not to vote for Vompatti. Some of you are calling this his "style"... I call it "playing like a boob". I'd much rather lynch Vompatti than lynch someone who is actually playing the game.
- Mon Dec 23, 2013 3:26 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: WWE MAFIA - Day 14
- Replies: 3141
- Views: 78250
Re: WWE MAFIA - Day 3
Maybe so, I'm just going by my memory of her preferring a baddie role. But maybe you're rightkneel4justice wrote:I disagree, and here is why. The only reason I see Jenny not pulling out of the game is if maybe she was scum with Lou or Summer. Normally, I would agree but this game there is something that was noticeably different. A replacement list. She didn't need to feel bad for dropping because it didn't really hurt her team if she was indeed scum.FZ. wrote:I'm not sure whether I should bring it up, but I noticed she's replacing Jenny, and I have a feeling there is more chance Jenny would drop out when she's a civvie than when she's a scum. But that's just assumptions. I think she wouldn't do it to her team if she were a civ, even if she didn't know any of them. Then again, maybe RL really prevented her from playing, and I don't know why she dropped out.kneel4justice wrote:I am always wary of those who come in saying they're using a different tactic. Just seems like an easy excuse to play differently from their "townie" game.Hedgeowl wrote:Ok, I don't have much time right now, but I have decided to try a different tactic this game. I will be looking for baddies in the top posters instead of low posters. One if a baddie is lynched we get more info from said lynch than lynching a baddie low poster, and two I think it more likely given some of the players and style that there are baddies running part of this thread. (Three, it slows the thread down a bit getting rid of a few chatty mcchattersons)
The list of top 10 living posters:
Epignosis 119
Mongoose 118
kneel4justice 87
Mister Rearranger 85
S~V~S 85
Loulou26 77
MovingPictures07 61
Summer 59
FZ. 58
Devin the Omniscient 54
Bullzeye 51
One of you is getting my vote later today, but since I am still catching up, might take me a bit more time. Also, given my brief time with the ksiters this seems to be fairly normal for most of them, so gives me pause there as well. I will consider more today as the day progresses, but this is where I am currently thinking since I am not 100% following current in thread accusations without more catch-up.
- Mon Dec 23, 2013 3:07 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: WWE MAFIA - Day 14
- Replies: 3141
- Views: 78250
Re: WWE MAFIA - Day 3
I'm not sure whether I should bring it up, but I noticed she's replacing Jenny, and I have a feeling there is more chance Jenny would drop out when she's a civvie than when she's a scum. But that's just assumptions. I think she wouldn't do it to her team if she were a civ, even if she didn't know any of them. Then again, maybe RL really prevented her from playing, and I don't know why she dropped out.kneel4justice wrote:I am always wary of those who come in saying they're using a different tactic. Just seems like an easy excuse to play differently from their "townie" game.Hedgeowl wrote:Ok, I don't have much time right now, but I have decided to try a different tactic this game. I will be looking for baddies in the top posters instead of low posters. One if a baddie is lynched we get more info from said lynch than lynching a baddie low poster, and two I think it more likely given some of the players and style that there are baddies running part of this thread. (Three, it slows the thread down a bit getting rid of a few chatty mcchattersons)
The list of top 10 living posters:
Epignosis 119
Mongoose 118
kneel4justice 87
Mister Rearranger 85
S~V~S 85
Loulou26 77
MovingPictures07 61
Summer 59
FZ. 58
Devin the Omniscient 54
Bullzeye 51
One of you is getting my vote later today, but since I am still catching up, might take me a bit more time. Also, given my brief time with the ksiters this seems to be fairly normal for most of them, so gives me pause there as well. I will consider more today as the day progresses, but this is where I am currently thinking since I am not 100% following current in thread accusations without more catch-up.
- Mon Dec 23, 2013 2:57 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: WWE MAFIA - Day 14
- Replies: 3141
- Views: 78250
Re: WWE MAFIA - Day 3
Not sure what to think about Bass. His reasons are fishy. I already said I think SVS is a baddie, and as for Sorsha, while I started out thinking she's a baddie with all that fluff, I really think that scum tend to rationalize their votes so you don't come after them exactly for that reason. Especially the type of players I associate Sorsha with. So right now, I think I'm actually leaning to her being a civ. Though I guess you all know her better than I do, so how does she handle votes when she's a baddie?Bullzeye wrote:So carrying on with looking at Mongoose voters I'm gonna have a poke at Bass and SVS (Voters 5 and 6 respectively). Doing it in the same post because Bass has also been really quiet, not sure how I overlooked that yesterday. The only thing that really caught my eye though is this:
He seems to be suggesting that the whole crosspost drama was actually reason to be suspicious. I know Bass is relatively new but maybe he could explain how that works because it really wouldn't have made sense if a baddie Mongoose had made the whole issue up in order to... I dunno, lose attention? Gain trust? It just strikes me as odd that anyone could say that's a reason to vote for someone.Bass_the_Clever wrote:I hate saying this but I'm going to have to go with epig on the mongoose vote today she has been acting really different from the game I just played with her and it worries me . It has just been one thing after another. From the day zero vote she made to "having problems with the site" issues she had and its just been one excuse after the other so for that reason I'm *voting Mongoose*
Anyway, on to SVS. As much as she often claims she finds it hard to read me and I can fool her, it's the same in reverse. I'm not sure if I'm seeing what some others are in terms of suspicion but I dunno if I'd say I trust her either. Her day one discussion with Epi where she said he was being rude seems like something I've generally seen from her as a baddie. I could be misremembering there and maybe someone could bring up an example of a game where she had a similar interaction as a civ. On the other hand I do agree with a lot of things she's said this game. I'm not sure where I stand on her.
I'll now go on to Sorsha. She was 10th to vote (keep this in mind, nobody else came anywhere close to even possibly being in danger of a lynch that day) and didn't mention Mongoose at all on day two. Nor did she give a reason as to why she'd voted. These are her day two posts:
Sorsha wrote:Turnip Head wrote:If all the discussion today had been about Phil Collins and not the game that we're playing, then I would understand randomizing, but... oh wait...Sorsha wrote:Can you please eloborate?Dom wrote:I think I'll probably vote Epig.
*cough*original Tribunal of Judgement member*cough*kneel4justice wrote:Interesting. A unshared of people Tribunal of Judgment Maligna.
You can usualy get the general jist (gist?) of the response if you do read through the response. There are some moments of clarity in the gibberish.Summer wrote:EBWOP
Guru... Have you been drinking and playing Mafia again???? You know that never ends well!!! (Btw, whoever did this to him... You probably just jumped to the top of his sh*t list!! )
On a serious note, I saw people talking about being cursed or whatever? Are his posts even going to be readable??
Nice post on bullz, Epi.Sorsha wrote:Yeah.... I'm a slow bloomer.FZ. wrote:I looked at the roles, and I was under the impression that the civ that could do that to K4J could only do it on night 3. Deflect on night 1, silence on night 2, and make someone crazy on night 3. And then all over again. Is that not what the role implies?
If it does, than that would imply it was a baddie who did this, and then, either K4J was very intuitive in his suspicions, and the baddies wanted to shut him up, but it just makes people trust him more, so why? Or K4J is a baddie and his team decided to do it to make him look like a civ. Or, it's one of the Ksiters that thought it would be funny to shut him up. Another option I see is someone wanting to frame one of the Ksiters.....or none of the above.
I'm sorry, I'm having a really hard time keeping up with two games, and no break like we're used to at nights. This is a major overload.
I'm not going to be here for the next 30+ hours, so I'm going to vote now. I'm going with Sorsha, because her game is pure fluff and OT, and I've seen absolutely nothing from her so far. Sorry I'm not coming up with anything more than that, but I can't keep up.Not a single mention of the case against Mongoose or what she though of it. In fact she never even mentions having an eye on Mongoose until that vote. She threw a vote onto the end of a bandwagon with no discussion at all. This really catches my eye, it seems to be the very definition of blendy.Sorsha wrote:Voted mongoose..
- Mon Dec 23, 2013 2:46 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: WWE MAFIA - Day 14
- Replies: 3141
- Views: 78250
Re: WWE MAFIA - Day 3
That's all you've got? After all the talk in all these days? Sounds scummy to me. He actually managed to convince me he is a civvie. It's funny that all he said made you think he's a baddie.Elohcin wrote:You made that easy for me. *votes Dev*Devin the Omniscient wrote: I realize my play style makes me stand out among the rest of the voters. I use this style when I don't care what happens to me, personally.
- Mon Dec 23, 2013 2:38 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: WWE MAFIA - Day 14
- Replies: 3141
- Views: 78250
Re: WWE MAFIA - Day 3
I fully agree with this post, and will most likely be voting for SVS. I was looking for the post where she commented on my question regarding Mongoose. Thanks for digging it up.MovingPictures07 wrote:Wow, okay. Finally have some time. So sorry for my thread absences. For those who are saying I'm less involved than usual, yes, I am less involved than usual in all 3 games I am in right now, and that is because it is the holiday season. I have a vacation from the 30th to the 8th that I am planning for; I was gone Friday evening through Sunday spending time with Daisy's family (if you really want someone to back that up, just ask Daisy or CBK); and I've also been spending time with my family before that. Not to mention the fact that I just recently 'finished' up applications to 11 PhD programs.
Russ, can you explain what it is that makes me bad? First you say SVS has a few good points about me being less involved, then the next post you say, me, her, and Epig are all possibly bad.
Regarding Devin, my thoughts have been clear. He always asks for people to vote for him -- see almost every single game he's ever played. As a civvie, he usually does so out of frustration, and especially more so when his RL is busier; as a baddie, he does it just to fuck with people. I am seeing a distracted civvie Devin here more than a maniacal baddie one, personally, and although I've wavered on that some, I'm back to more firmly believing that.
Regarding Vomps, yes, it's just Vomps. He acts this way a lot. Sometimes he actually contributes more than others; other times, he is WAY off the wall and contributes nothing or next to nothing. He seems to just be doing it because that's how enjoys the game. If players think he should go because of it, by all means vote for him, but it's normal behavior and it makes him next to impossible to read. For me, anyway, there are bigger fish to fry right now. Similar thoughts re: AP and Lizzy, though I do admit I have been pinged by Lizzy most so this game. AP seemed civvie to me earlier on based on his early thread contributions and tone/behavior.
Regarding DP, I noticed some players were talking about how he doesn't generally bandwagon, even when busy. This is true. Definitely has my eye, but I'm not totally sure what to think about him yet.
Okay, and now to address where I'm at. I was most considering Mata and S~V~S for my votes today going into the period, but then Mata died, so my vote seems easier. There are others I'm seriously heavily eyeballing based on their Mongoose bandwagon votes, but I feel most comfortable with an S~V~S vote. She CLEARLY is manipulating the thread.
I asked her to clarify on the Mongoose being bad one way or another thing due to her sounding 'sweet' or not.S~V~S wrote:MP, I am NOT going to quote your post and then try to surgically cut it down so i can answer one question, lol~
She has addressed this before, in other games, but for me, her baddie game was beautiful in AG, and she played a very light hearted fun, sweet game there. I know she has said it was due to the sockpuppets, but I thought of all the people playing, she was most obviously HER through the disguise. But i cannot read her for shit, which is why I would like to reread her in both threads. I thought that the observation FZ made, that she seemed to be playing different games at the same time in different threads was an interesting point. We might have a baddie Mongoose in one thread, and a civ in the other, although I could not say if that were the case which was which.The Sock Says: Can you think of any examples re: your Mongoose comments here? I'm not sure I've ever noticed anything like that, but I do tend to think she has distinct playing styles when she has different alignments.
What's throwing me off about Mongoose LATELY is that she seems to have different styles on different sites. What she is posting here seems much more of what I'm used to, whereas in the RM and KSite games lately she seemed a bit off to me.
But I think you learn more about a persons game hosting them that playing with them, tbh.
She then proceeds to completely manipulate the thread and after Mongoose flips, here is what she says:
No kidding?S~V~S wrote:Sorry Mongoose. People do tend to misunderstand your game
Of all the votes yesterday, both for and against mongoose, the one who tweaked me the most was Devin; he sounded like he was absolutely fawning on Epi, then he voted before Epi did? There have been a lot of things going on in this thread, and maybe we can sort them out a bit better. I am looking forward to K4J being able to speak again.
And then regarding her vote... she was very strong about believing Mongoose was bad, even as early as Day 1, yet where did she vote? Not Mongoose.S~V~S wrote:What do you mean, I threw my vote away? If i vote in a way other than one that makes sense to you, i threw my vote away?MovingPictures07 wrote:Also, sorry to say I couldn't go back and re-read, I literally have like no time, I barely have enough time to keep up with the thread. Though I do think the way people avoided voting Mongoose D1 after they mentioned something about her and then THREW THEIR VOTE AWAY (S~V~S, Bass, Devin, I'm looking at you -- at least Elo is consistent, you bunch are pinging me) should be looked at. I will be looking at them whenever I have tiome, probably Monday after work or maybe Sunday evening after I get home.
Since when has anything i have done gamewise made any sense to you?
This is NOT a matter of gamewise making sense; it's a matter of contradiction.
So please explain to me how the above is tone.S~V~S wrote:So you are falling back on tone? How lame, lol. You and Dom both, actually. K4J has a reason at least, although i have explained the reasoning behind my suspicion of Mongoose umpteen times. Perhaps she does not like conflict and that was why she kept trying to change the subject when i was trying to pin something down in her responses.
I have said it several times, and my story is not going to change since it is the truth.
Now for a current response...
This is ridiculous and only makes me more sure that you are bad. (not the DP part, the rest of it)S~V~S wrote:Ah, I see Vomp is using similar strategies in both games. Poor FZ, he's really messing with you, lol~
OK, I will think about this at work today. If i had to vote now, it would be between MP, Devin, & DP. Normally a post like Bullz' analysis of the Mongoose voters, but only the low posters, would ping the hell out of me, but I don't know that i agree with Epi on him, and he made some good points. Especially about DP~ I know DPs game pretty well, both bad and civ, and I don't see civ DP jumping on a bandwagon, he would vote a tangent, or even randomize later into the game than Day One. So that was rather blendy, and there is a difference between quiet and blendy.
MP (waits for the "No U") has made multiple versions of the same post this game:
"Sorry I am catching up"
"OK I have to catch up"
"I have not totally read the thread, but I have a few impressions"
"I always think SVS is bad, so i also think she is bad here"
"SVS made a suspicious vote for Mongoose"
"Not seeing the Devin suspicion"
This sounds to me like you are suspecting me becasue you think people expect you to suspect me, and if you did not suspect ME, they would suspect YOU. And that sounds like a baddie making an easy vote. I don;t think a civ MP would fall back on that when he was not caught up to the thread, and it sounds to me like you are trying to sound civ. And quite a few people made much more suspicious votes for Mongoose than I (like Devin, for example). I stated my reasons for suspecting her clearly, repeatedly & early.
And Devins whole game has pinged me since the beginning, and I have said so more than once. That last vote especially.
So off to work, between this being a super busy time of year for me at work, and our hiliday party being today, doubt i will be back until tonight.
Yes, I have been CONSTANTLY behind, and I wonder why that could be? Also, I've made plenty of contributions to this game beyond just what you point out here -- yet you bring up this suspicion of me all of a sudden because you know I'm onto something. To say I have made "multiple versions of the same post this game" is misrepresenting. And yes, I do like to keep everyone in tabs with what's going on in my life -- but I do it all the time, regardless of alignment.
Where did I always say I always think you're bad? It's true we never can see eye to eye, but that doesn't mean I always suspect you. In fact, recently I've not gunned after you in a few games and called your alignment correctly. Not that I'm infallible by any means. But more misrepresentation.
And I am NOT seeing the Devin suspicion; I've said multiple times over and over why. Same with Mongoose.
I'm not falling back on anything. You helped pushed the thread to Mongoose; you've said contradictory statements; you now try to make up this BS case against me to get me lynched.
How is Devin's vote MORE suspicious than yours? Could it just not mean he has less time than you? Yes, he could be baddie, but his behavior overall just doesn't say so to me. Not EVERY single voter of Mongoose that bandwagoned has to be baddie. Civvies bandwagon all the time. That's mafia. Of course it comes down to judgment and analyzing actions.
- Mon Dec 23, 2013 6:36 am
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: WWE MAFIA - Day 14
- Replies: 3141
- Views: 78250
Re: WWE MAFIA - Day 3
Pay out as in you surviving, or as in your team winning?Vompatti wrote:I don't remember if I'm a baddie or not. This has been my strategy from the beginning and I truly believe it will pay out in the end.FZ. wrote:Seriously? First, if you're not a baddie yourself, how is voting yourself going to help catch baddies. Unless you are one, and in that case, why are you playing in the first place? Second, if there's no point in looking for baddies other than randomizing, just go and fill a lottery ticket. Again, why play this game? No offense, of course.Vompatti wrote:I really don't see what the problem is. It's not like you're any more likely to catch a baddie by making up arguments than by randomizing or by voting for yourself.
I just don't get your logic
- Mon Dec 23, 2013 5:59 am
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: WWE MAFIA - Day 14
- Replies: 3141
- Views: 78250
Re: WWE MAFIA - Day 3
Seriously? First, if you're not a baddie yourself, how is voting yourself going to help catch baddies. Unless you are one, and in that case, why are you playing in the first place? Second, if there's no point in looking for baddies other than randomizing, just go and fill a lottery ticket. Again, why play this game? No offense, of course.Vompatti wrote:I really don't see what the problem is. It's not like you're any more likely to catch a baddie by making up arguments than by randomizing or by voting for yourself.
I just don't get your logic
- Mon Dec 23, 2013 5:36 am
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: WWE MAFIA - Day 14
- Replies: 3141
- Views: 78250
Re: WWE MAFIA - Day 3
I couldn't have worded this better myself. I've seen too many people voting for themselves, randomizing votes, giving replies of the "because I can" or "I feelTurnip Head wrote:What's your deal Vomp? You only come in to vote yourself, no participation whatsoever. Are you one of the people asking to be replaced? Because you basically aren't playing :-/
Not impressed overall with the participation for today, very few people have checked in with the thread so far and we only have ~24ish hours left.
I'm looking at Disgruntled Porcupine, Russtifinko, Vompatti or Devin for my vote this lynch. Devin and Russ both followed Epi a little too blindly in my opinion, and made sure to mention that they were following Epi's lead and not thinking for themselves. Now Devin is all like "It's my fault, kill me". It's not really a civvie reaction but then again it's not a baddie reaction either.
Russ has the "busy bein busy" excuse which makes it hard to look at his game objectively, but so far I don't like what I've seen from Russ's posts. He doesn't offer many clear thoughts, just vague possible suspicions. I feel that baddies give these vague thoughts more than civvies do. But I don't know Russ's game.
Vompatti, as stated above, only comes in to vote for himself. It's hard to make a case against him, but it's even harder to make a case for him being civvie. His complete apathy for what we're trying to accomplish in this game of mafia is unsettling.
When I asked what DP's thoughts on the game were, once upon a time, he replied to me "None." And that's been par for the course the whole game so far for DP.
It's not funny anymore you guys. If you're civvies, you need to help catch baddies. Anyone who's not actively trying to do that is probably scum. On a related note, if A Person votes for himself again, my vote might go there instead. Seriously, let's stop clowning around and nab us a baddie.
like it" type. How you you even catch baddies on this site. It's really frustrating. I don't get the point in playing if you're just voting for yourself or not participating at all. If you win, it's not because you were good, neither as a civ nor as a baddie, it's because you were too chicken to actually get into the game. So what's the point?
- Sun Dec 22, 2013 5:50 am
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: WWE MAFIA - Day 14
- Replies: 3141
- Views: 78250
Re: WWE MAFIA - Night 2
Wow, a sarcastic reply. They are so rare on this site, it's getting hard to recognize them.Devin the Omniscient wrote:How selfish of me. Should I have taken the blame for my own actions and then asked everyone to kill Epi? Did I do it wrong? Is that not the correct way to play? Do you request NKs and lynches differently on ksite?FZ. wrote:I'm starting to feel much better about Ksite and how often we lynch townies, It's not any better here.
K4J was very sure about his vote for Summer. Why was no one trying to get to to the bottom of that? For all we know, he could be dead next night, even if Summer isn't scum (with someone wanting to frame her), so we might get nothing from him. I know it's easy to say it now, since I wasn't here to do it myself, but I'd expect people to try and understand a little what he was saying.
I didn't like the way SVS talked about Mongoose and the fiasco with the two games. It was pretty obvious that the whole things was a mistake and it seemed like she was using it as an excuse to suspect her.
This sounds scummy. You're putting the responsibility on Epig. Do you now think he's a baddie or was he just wrong? Either way, I don't like how you made it about him instead of you.Devin the Omniscient wrote:Mister Rearranger wrote:Mata, Dex, Devi, Epi, Russ. In that order.Sorry Mongoose I have learned my lesson about trusting Epignosis: DON'T DO IT!!!S~V~S wrote:Sorry Mongoose. People do tend to misunderstand your game
Of all the votes yesterday, both for and against mongoose, the one who tweaked me the most was Devin; he sounded like he was absolutely fawning on Epi, then he voted before Epi did? There have been a lot of things going on in this thread, and maybe we can sort them out a bit better. I am looking forward to K4J being able to speak again.
Kill me first.
I do it this way: I mistrusted Epi's giant case on Mongoose. So kill me.
What I don't expect a civ to do is ask to be killed if he was just a part of another civ's kill. How would that help?
And with all the sarcasm, I didn't see your reply to whether you now think he's a baddie who outsmarted you into trusting him, or you think he was as misguided as you.
- Sun Dec 22, 2013 5:41 am
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: WWE MAFIA - Day 14
- Replies: 3141
- Views: 78250
Re: WWE MAFIA - Day 3
Sorry to see you go Mata.
I see Bullz is not dead. I just want to make sure I get how it works here. If the story tells us there was an attempt on his life, does that mean that we can rule out a blocker blocking the killer, right? Because I assume we wouldn't even hear about it. Or am I wrong?
How likely is it that he was saved? Was he that obvious of a civ that someone would save him out of everyone?
If we go just by roles and assume he escaped death on his own, there are 3 roles who can do that, two of them are civs', one is the orange team.
This should make us trust him more, not less. Why are you talking about voting for him? Unless I am wrong about the block.
Why hasn't Triple H killed anyone yet? He could either be an inactive player or someone who misses the nights all the time. Do we have any players that haven't posted yet or did very little? He could have been blocked, but since I think I read that you can't target the same person on two consecutive nights, it can't be that the RB blocked him, unless it's either one civ blocker and one baddie blocker. The probability of that is really low. Maybe he chose to not kill one night and was blocked the other.
I see Bullz is not dead. I just want to make sure I get how it works here. If the story tells us there was an attempt on his life, does that mean that we can rule out a blocker blocking the killer, right? Because I assume we wouldn't even hear about it. Or am I wrong?
How likely is it that he was saved? Was he that obvious of a civ that someone would save him out of everyone?
If we go just by roles and assume he escaped death on his own, there are 3 roles who can do that, two of them are civs', one is the orange team.
This should make us trust him more, not less. Why are you talking about voting for him? Unless I am wrong about the block.
Why hasn't Triple H killed anyone yet? He could either be an inactive player or someone who misses the nights all the time. Do we have any players that haven't posted yet or did very little? He could have been blocked, but since I think I read that you can't target the same person on two consecutive nights, it can't be that the RB blocked him, unless it's either one civ blocker and one baddie blocker. The probability of that is really low. Maybe he chose to not kill one night and was blocked the other.
- Sat Dec 21, 2013 6:41 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: WWE MAFIA - Day 14
- Replies: 3141
- Views: 78250
Re: WWE MAFIA - Night 2
Ohhhhhhh, thanksthellama73 wrote:That just means the person hasn't read it yet. You can still delete it if you decide you don't want them to see it. When they open it, it will be moved to your sent folder.
- Sat Dec 21, 2013 6:34 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: WWE MAFIA - Day 14
- Replies: 3141
- Views: 78250
Re: WWE MAFIA - Night 2
Apparently, I am now. Why is the message I sent stuck in the outbox and not in the sent folderthellama73 wrote:Are you having trouble with the Private Message function?FZ. wrote:Lol, I can't contact anyonethellama73 wrote:I am the mod, so you could PM me your question, but if you feel like you can't because I am in the other game, I would suggest asking DFaraday.FZ. wrote:I have a technical question, and I'm afraid if I ask it, it will maybe clue people to my role/alignment. And I can't ask it in the other game either. Is there someone who I could ask that is not playing either game?
- Sat Dec 21, 2013 6:30 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: WWE MAFIA - Day 14
- Replies: 3141
- Views: 78250
Re: WWE MAFIA - Night 2
Never mind, I think I figured it out. Thanks llama
- Sat Dec 21, 2013 6:26 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: WWE MAFIA - Day 14
- Replies: 3141
- Views: 78250
Re: WWE MAFIA - Night 2
Lol, I can't contact anyonethellama73 wrote:I am the mod, so you could PM me your question, but if you feel like you can't because I am in the other game, I would suggest asking DFaraday.FZ. wrote:I have a technical question, and I'm afraid if I ask it, it will maybe clue people to my role/alignment. And I can't ask it in the other game either. Is there someone who I could ask that is not playing either game?
- Sat Dec 21, 2013 6:06 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: WWE MAFIA - Day 14
- Replies: 3141
- Views: 78250
Re: WWE MAFIA - Night 2
I have a technical question, and I'm afraid if I ask it, it will maybe clue people to my role/alignment. And I can't ask it in the other game either. Is there someone who I could ask that is not playing either game?
- Sat Dec 21, 2013 5:29 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: WWE MAFIA - Day 14
- Replies: 3141
- Views: 78250
Re: WWE MAFIA - Night 1
I people seem to trust SVS, and I haven't read anything she said since I left, but her post when she voted for Mongoose felt really scummy to me. I'm too lazy to go find it, but maybe I should...kneel4justice wrote:The post was just her posting on her own, I believe. What you're saying does make sense. I just do not understand why she voted Mongoose in general. It didn't even feel like she suspected her. I don't know your point is something I have to think about.FZ. wrote:Thanks. Was her last post you quoted a reply to someone or was she just saying it on her own? Because while I see what you're saying here, I'm not sure I agree, especially if it wasn't a reply but her putting her thoughts out there. I think that I would expect a scum coming close to a lynch to not say something like "she sounds like she could be sincere...but I'm still voting for her" or something like that. It sounds too scummy to actually be scummy.I know this will send us back to the argument that baddies sometimes do obvious scummy things, but why say you're going to vote for someone if they sound sincere to you, when you can say something that would still make you look like you're debating, yet not come off scummy? something like: "maybe I'm wrong, but she is acting really scummy"kneel4justice wrote:@FZ. This is what I was referring to.kneel4justice wrote:Can you explain this "irons in the fire" comment. Was that saying you were suspicious or not, and why? I'm not seeing a definite opinion, but more of a playing both sides.Matahari wrote: I am not suspicious of mongoose because of the mistake or her otw view on lynching baddies. But I do think she might have too many irons in the fire (as in juggling games and chat rooms). I am trusting SVS right now, she seems her civvie self, (I know ppl hate it when their styles get compared, but it's all I have to look at this early) and I don't see a reason right now to mistrust Epig.
If mongoose is bad, then there may be some leads to teammates, so there's that.
Also why did you mention leads to teammates but not go any further as to discuss who may have been her teammates.I noticed that you do a lot of dismissing of your own first impressions and I have to wonder why. It feels like you want to cover yourself in case evidence comes out which later disproves your opinions. It's like an excuse before an excuse is even necessary.Matahari wrote:MP, when I said 'where have you gone' I didn't mean you weren't around much. I meant 'where is the more forceful MP' that I remember. But svs brought up a good point, when she mentioned the lost game. you were a civ there so, feel free to overlook my first impressions. I often doSeriously, I do not follow what caused you to vote.Matahari wrote:Mongoose's last couple of posts sound like she might be sincere. But I still think somethings have happened that cant be ignored. I'm going to vote mongoose because I don't have any susps that are stronger cases yet. If mongoose is good, then I think there's a rezzer in the game who can fix it.
I have some people to respond to, but I'll have to wait until tonight when I have more time.
That said, if it was a reply to someone questioning her, it's a whole new story.
- Sat Dec 21, 2013 5:13 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: WWE MAFIA - Day 14
- Replies: 3141
- Views: 78250
Re: WWE MAFIA - Night 1
Thanks. Was her last post you quoted a reply to someone or was she just saying it on her own? Because while I see what you're saying here, I'm not sure I agree, especially if it wasn't a reply but her putting her thoughts out there. I think that I would expect a scum coming close to a lynch to not say something like "she sounds like she could be sincere...but I'm still voting for her" or something like that. It sounds too scummy to actually be scummy.I know this will send us back to the argument that baddies sometimes do obvious scummy things, but why say you're going to vote for someone if they sound sincere to you, when you can say something that would still make you look like you're debating, yet not come off scummy? something like: "maybe I'm wrong, but she is acting really scummy"kneel4justice wrote:@FZ. This is what I was referring to.kneel4justice wrote:Can you explain this "irons in the fire" comment. Was that saying you were suspicious or not, and why? I'm not seeing a definite opinion, but more of a playing both sides.Matahari wrote: I am not suspicious of mongoose because of the mistake or her otw view on lynching baddies. But I do think she might have too many irons in the fire (as in juggling games and chat rooms). I am trusting SVS right now, she seems her civvie self, (I know ppl hate it when their styles get compared, but it's all I have to look at this early) and I don't see a reason right now to mistrust Epig.
If mongoose is bad, then there may be some leads to teammates, so there's that.
Also why did you mention leads to teammates but not go any further as to discuss who may have been her teammates.I noticed that you do a lot of dismissing of your own first impressions and I have to wonder why. It feels like you want to cover yourself in case evidence comes out which later disproves your opinions. It's like an excuse before an excuse is even necessary.Matahari wrote:MP, when I said 'where have you gone' I didn't mean you weren't around much. I meant 'where is the more forceful MP' that I remember. But svs brought up a good point, when she mentioned the lost game. you were a civ there so, feel free to overlook my first impressions. I often doSeriously, I do not follow what caused you to vote.Matahari wrote:Mongoose's last couple of posts sound like she might be sincere. But I still think somethings have happened that cant be ignored. I'm going to vote mongoose because I don't have any susps that are stronger cases yet. If mongoose is good, then I think there's a rezzer in the game who can fix it.
I have some people to respond to, but I'll have to wait until tonight when I have more time.
That said, if it was a reply to someone questioning her, it's a whole new story.
- Sat Dec 21, 2013 4:56 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: WWE MAFIA - Day 14
- Replies: 3141
- Views: 78250
Re: WWE MAFIA - Night 2
What did she say today? I can't freaking keep upkneel4justice wrote:Hm, well we have that in common. I am thinking that I would vote her too, I didn't realize how scummy she was until I reread today.Mister Rearranger wrote:I believe I would have voted for Mata if it came down to it (and if she were even in the running).kneel4justice wrote:You still didn't answer, if not for me who would you have voted? And if you would list your suspects, that'd be nice. I can't keep track of everyone's thoughts because I forget who is who sometimes.Mister Rearranger wrote: Apologies, I did miss your question directed at me. I'll go see if I can find it in a sec. I put in work during the discussion yesterday, when I could have just sat back. I've listed off who I'm eyeing now too, if you want me to elaborate on any of them, I won't mind doing so.
I'm also not counting out the possibility that you might have a teammate who insanified you to keep you from coming under fire in the first place.
So you're suspicious of me? The comment feels a bit out of the blue.
To be honest that theory isn't even necessary, because I could be on the opposing scum team. It kind of feels like you are trying to suspect me, but suit yourself. I have nothing to hide.
I've said before that I don't really trust anyone yet in this game. All options are on the table right now.
- Sat Dec 21, 2013 4:53 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: WWE MAFIA - Day 14
- Replies: 3141
- Views: 78250
Re: WWE MAFIA - Night 2
Oh, I see K4J can talk. I thought it was until next day. Scratch what I said about him possibly dying before we learn anything.
To answer you question Kitty, I'm just overwhelmed by playing two games and no off time at all, plus having to figure out so many new players, and the days being so short as well as the nights. I just can't keep up. you have to have no life in order to do it. I'm in owe of people who manage it. I get if it makes you more suspicious of me, but that's all I can give you. I didn't expect this to be too much when I took up two games.
See my previous post to see my suspects.
To answer you question Kitty, I'm just overwhelmed by playing two games and no off time at all, plus having to figure out so many new players, and the days being so short as well as the nights. I just can't keep up. you have to have no life in order to do it. I'm in owe of people who manage it. I get if it makes you more suspicious of me, but that's all I can give you. I didn't expect this to be too much when I took up two games.
See my previous post to see my suspects.
- Sat Dec 21, 2013 4:49 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: WWE MAFIA - Day 14
- Replies: 3141
- Views: 78250
Re: WWE MAFIA - Night 2
I'm starting to feel much better about Ksite and how often we lynch townies, It's not any better here.
K4J was very sure about his vote for Summer. Why was no one trying to get to to the bottom of that? For all we know, he could be dead next night, even if Summer isn't scum (with someone wanting to frame her), so we might get nothing from him. I know it's easy to say it now, since I wasn't here to do it myself, but I'd expect people to try and understand a little what he was saying.
I didn't like the way SVS talked about Mongoose and the fiasco with the two games. It was pretty obvious that the whole things was a mistake and it seemed like she was using it as an excuse to suspect her.
K4J was very sure about his vote for Summer. Why was no one trying to get to to the bottom of that? For all we know, he could be dead next night, even if Summer isn't scum (with someone wanting to frame her), so we might get nothing from him. I know it's easy to say it now, since I wasn't here to do it myself, but I'd expect people to try and understand a little what he was saying.
I didn't like the way SVS talked about Mongoose and the fiasco with the two games. It was pretty obvious that the whole things was a mistake and it seemed like she was using it as an excuse to suspect her.
This sounds scummy. You're putting the responsibility on Epig. Do you now think he's a baddie or was he just wrong? Either way, I don't like how you made it about him instead of you.Devin the Omniscient wrote:Mister Rearranger wrote:Mata, Dex, Devi, Epi, Russ. In that order.Sorry Mongoose I have learned my lesson about trusting Epignosis: DON'T DO IT!!!S~V~S wrote:Sorry Mongoose. People do tend to misunderstand your game
Of all the votes yesterday, both for and against mongoose, the one who tweaked me the most was Devin; he sounded like he was absolutely fawning on Epi, then he voted before Epi did? There have been a lot of things going on in this thread, and maybe we can sort them out a bit better. I am looking forward to K4J being able to speak again.
Kill me first.
- Fri Dec 20, 2013 8:11 am
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: WWE MAFIA - Day 14
- Replies: 3141
- Views: 78250
Re: WWE MAFIA - Day 2
One more thing, I do agree with MP that something is weird with Lizzie and the way she has a different pattern of voting in the two games she's playing here. I thought it meant she was a baddie there, but if she's not, it might mean she is here.
- Fri Dec 20, 2013 8:06 am
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: WWE MAFIA - Day 14
- Replies: 3141
- Views: 78250
Re: WWE MAFIA - Day 2
I looked at the roles, and I was under the impression that the civ that could do that to K4J could only do it on night 3. Deflect on night 1, silence on night 2, and make someone crazy on night 3. And then all over again. Is that not what the role implies?
If it does, than that would imply it was a baddie who did this, and then, either K4J was very intuitive in his suspicions, and the baddies wanted to shut him up, but it just makes people trust him more, so why? Or K4J is a baddie and his team decided to do it to make him look like a civ. Or, it's one of the Ksiters that thought it would be funny to shut him up. Another option I see is someone wanting to frame one of the Ksiters.....or none of the above.
I'm sorry, I'm having a really hard time keeping up with two games, and no break like we're used to at nights. This is a major overload.
I'm not going to be here for the next 30+ hours, so I'm going to vote now. I'm going with Sorsha, because her game is pure fluff and OT, and I've seen absolutely nothing from her so far. Sorry I'm not coming up with anything more than that, but I can't keep up.
If it does, than that would imply it was a baddie who did this, and then, either K4J was very intuitive in his suspicions, and the baddies wanted to shut him up, but it just makes people trust him more, so why? Or K4J is a baddie and his team decided to do it to make him look like a civ. Or, it's one of the Ksiters that thought it would be funny to shut him up. Another option I see is someone wanting to frame one of the Ksiters.....or none of the above.
I'm sorry, I'm having a really hard time keeping up with two games, and no break like we're used to at nights. This is a major overload.
I'm not going to be here for the next 30+ hours, so I'm going to vote now. I'm going with Sorsha, because her game is pure fluff and OT, and I've seen absolutely nothing from her so far. Sorry I'm not coming up with anything more than that, but I can't keep up.
- Thu Dec 19, 2013 6:48 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: WWE MAFIA - Day 14
- Replies: 3141
- Views: 78250
Re: WWE MAFIA - Night 1
It happens in the full editor as wellMongoose wrote:This happens to me often if I type my post in Quick Reply. I will press submit and nothing happens. It doesn't happen when I use Full Editor mode to make a post.
It happens on various browsers and on various computers, so I've just trained myself to always use Full Editor mode lest I lose another important post.
linki - Whoa! Someone got insanified/cursed. I particularly love the word "saltpeter" in the bottom of his post.
So that what it means to be insanified. I was wondering what things like that meant. Is the person who causes it good or bad? I forgot the roles. Also, how does it work? He doesn't know this will happen? He posts regularly and it goes nuts when it comes out? Can we make anything from those posts?
I wonder who did it. There is Epig who butted heads with him before, and then, there's MR who said he was glad he was in the game.
I'm falling asleep, so I"m going to bed.
- Thu Dec 19, 2013 6:40 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: WWE MAFIA - Day 14
- Replies: 3141
- Views: 78250
Re: WWE MAFIA - Night 1
OK, thanks. I'll try that. It's xp.S~V~S wrote:Mine does that, too, are you running Firefox in XP or Vista? Now I get it. Just hit the preview button every few minutes or so. If you have a meltdown, you can retrace back to a reasonable starting point.FZ. wrote:S~V~S wrote:Parts of it? Please do me a favor and try to write a long off topic post, and cut and paste it into a pm occasionally until it happens again , then paste the results into said pm and send it to me?FZ. wrote:I am so fed up with this. I've been trying to write something for 15 minutes, and it keeps erasing parts of it
Logging you out I could see but losing just parts of it is something I don't understand.
My cursor is a loose cannon. It jumps from place to place and then erases things. It's not only here that it happens. But I can't find a redo button here, so if something like that happens, I just lose everything I wrote. It's pissing me to no end.
Sorry this in not green, I am on phone and formatting can be a bitch.
- Thu Dec 19, 2013 6:07 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: WWE MAFIA - Day 14
- Replies: 3141
- Views: 78250
Re: WWE MAFIA - Night 1
S~V~S wrote:Parts of it? Please do me a favor and try to write a long off topic post, and cut and paste it into a pm occasionally until it happens again , then paste the results into said pm and send it to me?FZ. wrote:I am so fed up with this. I've been trying to write something for 15 minutes, and it keeps erasing parts of it
Logging you out I could see but losing just parts of it is something I don't understand.
My cursor is a loose cannon. It jumps from place to place and then erases things. It's not only here that it happens. But I can't find a redo button here, so if something like that happens, I just lose everything I wrote. It's pissing me to no end.
- Thu Dec 19, 2013 5:53 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: WWE MAFIA - Day 14
- Replies: 3141
- Views: 78250
Re: WWE MAFIA - Night 1
I am so fed up with this. I've been trying to write something for 15 minutes, and it keeps erasing parts of it
- Thu Dec 19, 2013 4:56 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: WWE MAFIA - Day 14
- Replies: 3141
- Views: 78250
Re: WWE MAFIA - Night 1
I know what the options are. Heck I can think of a few more. I just wanted to know what people thought about that.Mongoose wrote:Triple H could have been blocked or unable to use the power in some other way. Some players might even elect to not use his/her power at night for various reasons. Or the player may have forgotten to send in a night PM.FZ. wrote:I just went and looked at the roles. It seems there are supposed to be two deaths every night. The two baddie teams each get a kill every other night, and Triple H gets one every night. So why was there only one person dead?
How sure can we be that BWT was a townie. On Ksite, we learn people's role after they die no matter whether it's a day lynch or a night kill. So this is new to me
- Thu Dec 19, 2013 4:06 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: WWE MAFIA - Day 14
- Replies: 3141
- Views: 78250
Re: WWE MAFIA - Night 1
I just went and looked at the roles. It seems there are supposed to be two deaths every night. The two baddie teams each get a kill every other night, and Triple H gets one every night. So why was there only one person dead?