The Syndicate

I'm going to Chicago to gaze into the shimmery Cloud Gate and hope for another epiphany tomorrow. Only going for the one night... Just a f.y.i. for y'all

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Epignosis wrote:I don't really care. When I spend a chunk of my time during the first 24 hours and people like Sorsha come in and go "epiphany" at the last minute, what can you do?

Lynch her?

DrWilgy wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:

Epignosis wrote:I don't really care. When I spend a chunk of my time during the first 24 hours and people like Sorsha come in and go "epiphany" at the last minute, what can you do?

Epi what do you think of Marmots and LC's vote. I see you draggin on with Sorsha abit, but I wpuld say that LC's is weirder.

It clearly doesn't matter what I think.

No it does. You are wrong about me being bad, but I don't know about you and I need your input on players who aren't me.

I also need SVS and LC to get in here. SVS where were you and what are your thoughts. LC, why? What you did made no sense.

Why doesn't what LC did make sense?

You've obviously never been licked by an angel

Was the vote tied Epi? Whose vote did you steal?

Llama- was the vote tied?

That's the last time I listen to angels who lick

Sorry DF- RIP

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Sorsha wrote:Oh yeah- that too. The licking.

Voted DF

Wait, why'd you vote for your Captainmate?

You are getting your games mixed up Marmot. That was spirited away that DF was my partner. Do you have a concussion?

Oh yeah- that too. The licking.

Voted DF

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Sorsha wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Sorsha wrote:

Epignosis wrote:
Did you utter this at any point yesterday or the day before?

No, it only really came to me when I was reading Wilgy's pre-death posts today. It was like an epiphany.

But... Wilgy's not dead... yet.

I know but he thought he was dying so he was doing one of those legacy post things.

Linki- It was spiritual Epignosis.

You're telling me that you read DrWilgy's posts, and your doubts about him were spirited away?

Spoiler: show

More like this:
And he said "I am DrWilgy and I mean you no harm"

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Sorsha wrote:

Epignosis wrote:
Did you utter this at any point yesterday or the day before?

No, it only really came to me when I was reading Wilgy's pre-death posts today. It was like an epiphany.

But... Wilgy's not dead... yet.

I know but he thought he was dying so he was doing one of those legacy post things.

Linki- It was spiritual Epignosis.

Epignosis wrote:
Did you utter this at any point yesterday or the day before?

No, it only really came to me when I was reading Wilgy's pre-death posts today. It was like an epiphany.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Sorsha wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

Sorsha wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

Sorsha wrote:I don't think DrWilgy is bad. I'll probably vote for DF to give Wilgy a shot at survival today.

No reasoning behind this, I see. Just a "I don't think" and an "I'll probably."

No point behind this. Just putting quotes around words.

I spent a goodish amount of my afternoon yesterday ripping Wilgy a new one, and this is all you have to say.

Well I'm not going to go point by point through it and explain why I think you're wrong. I don't think wilgy is bad for the same reason I'm trusting svs this game. I don't think they bussed zebra.

Why do you trust SVS though?

The timing of her vote on zebra the other day. It was kind of like a save her self situation. She thought she was going to be lynched so she put a vote on the only other player who might be lynched, zebra. I don't think she would have done that if they both were bad

Epignosis wrote:

Sorsha wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

Sorsha wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

Sorsha wrote:I don't think DrWilgy is bad. I'll probably vote for DF to give Wilgy a shot at survival today.

No reasoning behind this, I see. Just a "I don't think" and an "I'll probably."

No point behind this. Just putting quotes around words.

I spent a goodish amount of my afternoon yesterday ripping Wilgy a new one, and this is all you have to say.

Well I'm not going to go point by point through it and explain why I think you're wrong. I don't think wilgy is bad for the same reason I'm trusting svs this game. I don't think they bussed zebra.

I didn't ask you to go point-by-point. There is a happy medium between saying nothing and saying everything.

For me that happy medium is "I don't think Wilgy is bad."

Epignosis wrote:

Sorsha wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

Sorsha wrote:I don't think DrWilgy is bad. I'll probably vote for DF to give Wilgy a shot at survival today.

No reasoning behind this, I see. Just a "I don't think" and an "I'll probably."

No point behind this. Just putting quotes around words.

I spent a goodish amount of my afternoon yesterday ripping Wilgy a new one, and this is all you have to say.

Well I'm not going to go point by point through it and explain why I think you're wrong. I don't think wilgy is bad for the same reason I'm trusting svs this game. I don't think they bussed zebra.

Epignosis wrote:

Sorsha wrote:I don't think DrWilgy is bad. I'll probably vote for DF to give Wilgy a shot at survival today.

No reasoning behind this, I see. Just a "I don't think" and an "I'll probably."

No point behind this. Just putting quotes around words.

I don't think DrWilgy is bad. I'll probably vote for DF to give Wilgy a shot at survival today.

Looks like you've got yourself into quite the pickle DrWilgy.

Serge thought Scotty was bad, if serge was Barry I think he'd have tried to kill him last night. Unless serge had someone he thought was more likely a soldier. So if Scotty is still alive I'd lean towards civ on him as well.

Epignosis wrote:I voted Sorsha.

Lame

Epignosis wrote:I really want to vote for Sorsha now.

Lol... Oops. That's what happens when you vote half asleep

DrWilgy wrote:Gleam isn't bad... I don't think he would've voted someone with 0 votes if he were bad. I feel like he'd be playing much more for survival if he were bad.

Unless they are also his teammate?

I'm voting for Scotty, I think both he and gleam are bad but Scotty isn't the one with the kill responsibility,

If this is not a case of an inactive missing a PM and is instead someone setting the inactives up I'm looking at Scotty and/or LC as Captains. Wilgy has been supatowning since the zebra lynch and night two had both of them on his radar..... until this whole no nk happened and the focus has shifted. Scotty was also very quick to jump on a vote today and has been advocating for the gleam vote.

@LC- I didn't persue the SVS three way tie thing because after her vote yesterday (for zebra) I don't find her any where near the top of my suspicions.

Yeah and with apparently no blocker or Doctor... Someone forget to send in a PM?

Sorry I missed it. Blame my mother.

S~V~S wrote:Quick question, LC & Sorsha, can I get opinions on each other? Not becasue I specifically suspect either of you, but becasue of recent history, I think it would be valuable.

I usually think LC is bad and I'm wrong as often as I'm right. I don't see anything in this game that reminds me of the last game so far though. Absolutely not defending him, I wouldn't fight a LC lynch today but I can't read him well at all and never have been able to.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:Do point out observations on defence vs neutral and aggro please. Are there any key words that set a defensive tone?

Why do I change my spelling of defense?

...

Are both correct? I think both are correct... EPIIIIII!!! I need you!!!

Also, I like the SVS observation. Has she done this before?

Pssst, DrWilgy. Epignosis stated that SVS has done this before. You can lick her now.

I'm not sure which observation Wilgy was referring to, mine or Epis. Epi was saying SVS made the same poll time end mistake earlier in this game. My observation was about her being so flippant about creating a tie.

I don't think that making a poll end time mistake is a damning offense

Where are serge and gleam? I know its not a very chatty game but they haven't posted since night.

S~V~S wrote:I am gonna make it a three way & vote for sig. Let someone else be the decider

This was it. I don't recall SVS doing something like this before but I'm sure someone will remind if she has.

The three way tie was between Wilgy, Serge and sig. We know sig was civ so it looks like maybe a save attempt for Serge or Wilgy? After that LC put sig in the lead again- bwt tied it between sig and wilgy, then Rico made it a three way tie again.

a2thezebra wrote:

S~V~S wrote:Why do you think he is bad? I have problems getting past his increasingly zany game these days. I have problems seeing past it.

What am I missing?

I said this in a previous game and whether he realizes it or not Wilgy has a pattern. His approach to the game and his attitude towards it are indicative of his alignment. This is baddie Wilgy if I've ever seen him.

I know in the past I've thought I figured out Wilgys meta and I was wrong, he's a hard one to figure out.

Linki- there was something SVS said yesterday that pinged me a little bit too, I'll go find it. Yay for suspicious post timing on a similar subject with Epi

Ok, I need to get back to sleep and theres only a half hour left... I'm going to give sig the botd today and vote for Wilgy.

I could see my vote going to Wilgy- he has mostly joke posts and his serious, on-topic ones are about the gamblers fallacy thing. I don’t see how someones opinion on that would be an indicator of civ/bad leanings so its looking like fluff disguised as content.

I could see a sig vote- I think he’s over reacting to zebra voting for him, it also kinda bothers me that he wouldn’t at least wait to see if he had to vote the same way after the whole early end time mistake. The plus side is that he doesn’t seem to be pushing for a Wilgy wagon and I kinda like a Wilgy vote myself.

The LC/Serge dragon thing- It's possible they do have BTSC and decided to see who they could rile up for a reaction. There is just as much civ bts this game as there is mafia though. I don’t think prodding someone or fishing for reactions is something only mafia do. They deserve to have an eye kept on them for sure but I don't plan on voting for either of them today.

Damn this end time sucks for me... I'm usually still sleeping. Catching up now.

sig wrote:I already said I thought if we had already voted we had to revote for the player we voted for since votes aren't changeable? The only reason I thought Llama restarted the poll is so everyone else could vote. Did I mess up with that?

Oh, I guess I'd have checked to make sure first.

Just caught up and don't have much time before I go to work...

S~V~S wrote:Do you have an opinion on Serge and what he laid down? I am not sure what I think of it.

I thought he was just joking about the "Captain Obvious" title under your username.
Maybe he was fishing for a reaction as well.


Sig- why did you automatically revote for Wilgy after the poll was reset? We have a whole nother day....

Wilgy- I don't see how someones stance on gamblers fallacy has bearing on their alignment this game. Unless I'm interpreting your argument wrong.

Does anyone really think that just because someone says "I'm not voting for (person X) today because of (some silly non present game related reason)" would really NOT vote for that person if some irrefutable evidence came up? Or not even irrefutable but very strong/scum slip-type thing? Come on... I think that's one of those things that goes without saying.

Thank you DF

You assume correctly LC, I'm not bad this game, thank God llama. I don't do the maths but I don't think this is sound probability though. I think it's something like we each have as likely a chance of being bad each game whether we were bad the last game, or last 10 games, as the next person.
Right? Don't ask to me explain how though, get a math person to do that.

I am here!