The Syndicate

Sorsha wrote:In other news: Is no one suspicious of Bass anymore? It seems like he drops in here and there to vote and leave some random post but isn't doing much of anything else. I'd think he is a good candidate for the last cabal member?

Dom wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Why aren't we lynching timmer anymore?

timmer

I never fully understood the case against him. So

Dom wrote:BAss, since you're around-- want to respond to this?

Dom wrote:

Bass_the_Clever wrote:

Turnip Head wrote:My main beef with Bass is his posts during the Canuck vs juliets lynch. Here are his only two posts from that Day:


3:37pm

Bass_the_Clever wrote:Sorry haven't been around . I'm catching up now.

9:12pm

Bass_the_Clever wrote:I ag ree I think juliets and canuck are both wroth lynching but I think Canuck is where my vote is going tonight.

What pings me is that he didn't justify why he chose Canuck over juliets when the lynch was 8-5 in juliets' favor when he voted. If he had said why he voted that way I would feel better, but it looks like a save. If he thoughts juliets was worth lynching, why didn't he vote for the frontrunner? There's also a 6 hour gap between when he said he was catching up and when he voted with nothing in between, which makes it feel like he was intentionally trying to stay out of the discussion that Day.

He doesn't have any on-topic posts since that vote. He just votes in the night polls.

Basically I'd like to hear from Bass about why he voted the way he did.

I voted that way because more people I trusted voted that way and I wasn't keeping up as much as I should have been.

OK so you have people you trust?
So.. ergo.. you have people you don't trust... people you think are bad?
Who are they?

Sorsha wrote:Bass why weren't you here for either of the Juliets lynches the past two days?

Turnip Head wrote:My main beef with Bass is his posts during the Canuck vs juliets lynch. Here are his only two posts from that Day:


3:37pm

Bass_the_Clever wrote:Sorry haven't been around . I'm catching up now.

9:12pm

Bass_the_Clever wrote:I ag ree I think juliets and canuck are both wroth lynching but I think Canuck is where my vote is going tonight.

What pings me is that he didn't justify why he chose Canuck over juliets when the lynch was 8-5 in juliets' favor when he voted. If he had said why he voted that way I would feel better, but it looks like a save. If he thoughts juliets was worth lynching, why didn't he vote for the frontrunner? There's also a 6 hour gap between when he said he was catching up and when he voted with nothing in between, which makes it feel like he was intentionally trying to stay out of the discussion that Day.

He doesn't have any on-topic posts since that vote. He just votes in the night polls.

Basically I'd like to hear from Bass about why he voted the way he did.

fingersplints wrote:

Bass_the_Clever wrote:

Dom wrote:Not sad about that lynch! Good result-- though it makes me doubt a bit my Sorsha suspicion.

Bass_the_Clever wrote:I don't get why people are saying that what I was saying was wierd. Not going to lie I had a few to many drinks in me last night when I post and realized it was sloppy but I stand by what I said.

What specifically do you stand by?



Sorry for not being aroudn-- fell asleep. :///

That it wasn't wise to vote for a double Lynch. It think when the vote was mad the odds were not in the civvies favor. It was good that we got an Indy last night I just hope we don't Lynch a civ tonight

Wait so do you still stand by it? Because yesterday you said it was wrong

Bass_the_Clever wrote:

fingersplints wrote:

Bass_the_Clever wrote:I don't get why people are saying that what I was saying was wierd. Not going to lie I had a few to many drinks in me last night when I post and realized it was sloppy but I stand by what I said.

I don't get why you don't want to answer my question. How would we get more information from one lynch as opposed to two?

Voting bass
If you give me a good enough answer I will move it.

I hope you guys are right about nutella, but I'm not voting there. I literally didn't have a read on her, and I am not going to jump on a bandwagon of her just because one was forming on someone else. In fact I think it's suspicious the amount of people doing that (while calling her blendy and accusing her of doing just that lol)

Sorry I didn't see it. I mean technically you would get more info from two lynches because we will find out two people's roles . So that statement I said was wrong. .

Tranq wrote:@ Bass: Even 10 lynches in a row are better than having only only lynch. The point being that we basically skipped a Night phase in which the mafia could've killed.

Dom wrote:Not sad about that lynch! Good result-- though it makes me doubt a bit my Sorsha suspicion.

Bass_the_Clever wrote:I don't get why people are saying that what I was saying was wierd. Not going to lie I had a few to many drinks in me last night when I post and realized it was sloppy but I stand by what I said.

What specifically do you stand by?



Sorry for not being aroudn-- fell asleep. :///

fingersplints wrote:

Bass_the_Clever wrote:I don't get why people are saying that what I was saying was wierd. Not going to lie I had a few to many drinks in me last night when I post and realized it was sloppy but I stand by what I said.

I don't get why you don't want to answer my question. How would we get more information from one lynch as opposed to two?

Voting bass
If you give me a good enough answer I will move it.

I hope you guys are right about nutella, but I'm not voting there. I literally didn't have a read on her, and I am not going to jump on a bandwagon of her just because one was forming on someone else. In fact I think it's suspicious the amount of people doing that (while calling her blendy and accusing her of doing just that lol)

Epignosis wrote:

Bass_the_Clever wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

Bass_the_Clever wrote:I don't get why people are saying that what I was saying was wierd. Not going to lie I had a few to many drinks in me last night when I post and realized it was sloppy but I stand by what I said.

I know your mom and I'm telling.

Lol. Hey I think she will be happy I'm posting after my last few games.

Not your drinking. Your bad spelling.

Epignosis wrote:

Bass_the_Clever wrote:I don't get why people are saying that what I was saying was wierd. Not going to lie I had a few to many drinks in me last night when I post and realized it was sloppy but I stand by what I said.

I know your mom and I'm telling.

HamburgerBoy wrote:

Bass_the_Clever wrote:Is Luke getting votes because he hasn't been posting?

Pretty much. I'd be fine with Canucklehead or others going too though, but it's a better lynch than nutella. I don't think the switch regarding the lack of nutella votes a couple hours ago is a great point; golden tried very hard to establish a scumteam between the two (and myself) on tenuous evidence and that clearly didn't hold true. People seem to be switching back to her now purely on pressure from Epi; I don't suspect Epi but I do suspect those being pressured, especially Juliets.

Draconus wrote:

sig wrote:

Draconus wrote:Placeholder vote on Bass. Simply because I don't know the other cases yet.

Epi, any pings/cases on those who voted for non-changeable vote option?

What is the case on Bass?

Know the reason I didn't vote for a double lynch was simply, it increases the chances that I could get lynched.

Pretty much mine and Epi's interactions with him recently. I haven't had that much time to catch up, so I am unsure of anything brought up about him prior to Night 3.
Thank you for your explanation. That seems fair. Can I get your viewpoint on why people want you lynched?

Epignosis wrote:

Bass_the_Clever wrote:When playing as mafia the whole idea behind using a kill is to set a civvie up for the next Lynch.

So...your argument against lynching two people is that...Mafia will kill to set up two people? How do they manage that?

Bass_the_Clever wrote:Non changeable votes makes people use there vote and place it somewhere it's going to stick and doesn't allow people to jump all or the place.

Changeable votes benefit civilians more than Mafia.

Tell me, anyone: When you are bad, do you feel less or more comfortable going into a Day phase knowing that the tide can turn against you at the eleventh hour?

Bass_the_Clever wrote:Do you have two people you really think that are mafia ? With out a question of a doubt?

Without a question of doubt?

Erm...no.

If I did, this game would cease to offer any entertainment value whatsoever. I'd rather play pick up sticks if no element of doubt were involved.

Bass_the_Clever wrote:Can you honestly say that to Lynches can't benefit the mafia too?

That's a risk you take when you sign up for Mafia in the first place. There are, at most, eight Mafia loose. If this is seriously your viewpoint, then you are arguing that we shouldn't have any lynches, because lynches can hurt civilians.

My argument is that a lynch is the civilians' primary weapon. It stands to reason, therefore, that two lynches for the price of one benefit civilians.

Yes, those lynches have to be right, but that fact doesn't change whether you have one lynch or fifteen- it's the object of the game.

Golden wrote:

Bass_the_Clever wrote:

Golden wrote:How odd, that you should put your vote on the person I've pushed the case for, and on me.

Did you realise that the reason I'm pushing bubbles is because I think she is on the team who killed timmer, and the reason I'm defending sig is because I think he is not.

I going off how everything read to me. I don't know about interactions between timer it who else was killed. I asked about that stuff and didn't get anything, the only person who addressed what I said was sig.

I'm happy to address any questions you have. I realise its impossible for you to get everything when its 30 pages of stuff to catch up on.

Golden wrote:How odd, that you should put your vote on the person I've pushed the case for, and on me.

Did you realise that the reason I'm pushing bubbles is because I think she is on the team who killed timmer, and the reason I'm defending sig is because I think he is not.

sig wrote:

Bass_the_Clever wrote:Hey everyone. So there is no way I can catch up on 30 pages, but I did read everything from where I was ask to replace in. All I'm seeing is a bunch of stuff about sig and bubbles with hints of stuff about golden . So I'm going to be focusing on the cases on those 3.
Also if anyone can give me a recap oh people who had meaning full interaction with the people who were kill it would really help.

Know I'm not sure about the bubbles case much, people have mentioned golden for seeming disingenuous for defending me I believe.

Know people voting for me is focusing around that I said after Timmers death the mafia is most likely killing low posters. This got a few players suspicious and began accusing me and when I defended myself they said my defense was suspicious. Know zebra one of the two main people pursuing me was killed leading me to believe the mafia are attempting to set me up, and the other pushing my lynch is bulls who I believe is mafia. I can't recall the other reasons for those who voted for me though.

so today you vote for one player in each Option and votes are changable.

@juliets I'd most likely vote for Bullzeye right know, though if I'm not in fear of getting lynched I'd review the cases of the other leading wagons. I won't be voting Golden today though.

DFaraday wrote:I'd also point out that we still have a full day left in this phase, so saying I voted you and never came back sounds a bit alarmist.

I meant the previous day phase.
Know DFaraday my first game here Bullets over Broadway we were on the same mafia team correct? In said games I made no scum slips but was instead caught mainly by sloonie for flipflopping and being wishy washy on voting and reads. Do you agree with this?