The Syndicate

S~V~S wrote:

Epignosis wrote:Let me try that again: Stop worrying about the outed member of the mafia. Who are his teammates and why? Go after them.

At this point he's just a distraction. Here we all are arguing over whether to Lynch him or not rather than discussing alternatives.

Make the outed baddie go away.

S~V~S wrote:I think someone trying to set up you most likely.

Epignosis wrote:

Jackofhearts2005 wrote:

Scotty wrote:This might be cliche but I'm not thrilled with any of Marmot's 7 posts so far. Granted, that was Day 0. But he could probably shave the fluff, that naked rat

What's a townie Marmot look like?

I cut out the naked mammal even though Eloh is dead.

We know this is a fabricated question, because either Jack knows MM is a civilian or he doesn't care for the answer because MM isn't.

Given that Scotty had already implied his reason for not liking MM's posts (they're devoid of game-related purpose), this by itself looks suspicious to me. However, subsequent MM interactions make me less inclined to believe they are working together.

I do believe, on the other hand, that Jack's exchange with Scotty about other people opened the door for this pointless question:

Jackofhearts2005 wrote:Tell me more about DF's meta. He made it like 3 posts before getting replaced in the only game we've played together.

Scotty never got back to answer about DF. For the same reason outlined above, Jack obviously wasn't interested in learning anything about DF (notice that he never got an answer and never asked anybody else about DF). Given what was already said about DF's tendency toward being a low poster (what Scotty said and Jack's mention of DF getting replaced), and given that Jack only asked this specific question about MM and DF, I believe one of them is on his team.

Between the two of them, I'd say it's DF.

DrWilgy wrote:

MacDougall wrote:Why am I getting so much suspicionnnnnn... I did the scum hunt and found us a badder what more do you want from me.

I'm giving you no suspicion. I would like for you to be civ this game so we can not be on opposing factions again.

Marmot wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:

S~V~S wrote:

MacDougall wrote:Uh didn't Wilgy and I literally create a four way tie immortalised in sig widget for shits and giggles?

It was him too? Hrm, I forgot about his involvement, I just remembered yours

Did he chatter with you alot in thread besides that?

Oh yeah, that was fun.

I think the only game where I specifically chose a teammate to joke around with was Marmot in RoTK and that ended horribly.

The dead marmot from that game is still churning in his grave.

This is my fault Marmot. I will bear this weight until the day I die. I will do whatever I can to regain your honor.

DrWilgy wrote:

S~V~S wrote:

MacDougall wrote:Uh didn't Wilgy and I literally create a four way tie immortalised in sig widget for shits and giggles?

It was him too? Hrm, I forgot about his involvement, I just remembered yours

Did he chatter with you alot in thread besides that?

Oh yeah, that was fun.

I think the only game where I specifically chose a teammate to joke around with was Marmot in RoTK and that ended horribly.

thellama73 wrote:

MacDougall wrote:Epignosis is so good at reading Mafia players that I can only assume that him finding an indy on day 1 is because he is Mafia otherwise he'd have scented out Jack. This is not a joke.

I'm not happy with Mac's glowing buddying with Epi here. "Oh Epi, you're so smart and handsome! Lead me! Lead me hard!"

Shifty.

FZ. wrote:What a pleasant surprise. To be honest, I didn't think JackOH was bad. Not to take anything from Scotty's hunting skills, I don't think he would have wanted to take out a baddie, since that would mean he would have to be the last man standing, and that is probably harder than winning with the mafia, but who knows. I don't get why he was going after the person he wanted to take down with him anyway. Wouldn't that be a waste?

G-Man wrote:Hillary Points Standings:

+5 Points: S~V~S
+4 Points: Elohcin, thellama73
+3 Points: FZ., Long Con, Marmot, notsawyer540
+2.5 Points: Epignosis
+2 Points: Dfaraday, Jackofhearts2005, MacDougall, Scotty
+1 Point: DrWilgy, TheFloyd73
-4 Points: Quin

Epignosis wrote:Scotty was beyond independent. He was a last man standing serial killer. This is, in my opinion, the best possible Day 1 outcome short of a mafia powered role getting taken out instead.

S~V~S wrote:Also, any screencaps of the final poll?

Jackofhearts2005 wrote:Diablo Rex is cracking me up.

What's CFD again?

Am I the only one that thinks naked mole rats are awesome? They got some at the Dallas zoo and the kiddo loves watching them.

Epignosis wrote:

Marmot wrote:None of the Post links in the OP work.

Only Republicans complain about things not working.

thellama73 wrote:

Marmot wrote:I'm voting Scotty for this atrocity of a post.

Now you're going to get Eloh's vote.

MacDougall wrote:Epignosis caught me on day 1 of GoC so hot damn that's enough for me.

FZ. wrote:I'm reading through. I have to say I'm leaning on agreeing with Epi on Scotty. Some of his posts feel to me like how I would play when mafia, by trying to look helpful in his attempt to analyse the host's post, and by looking like he's doing some serious hunting, while it doesn't feel genuine to me.
I have two reservations:
1. the part where he randomly chooses a low poster. That's poor hunting, and I think Scotty is smarter than that. 2. I also understand where he's coming from, with his suspicion of the marmot. He tends to lay low and be more fluffy when he's bad.
So

Jackofhearts2005 wrote:

Marmot wrote:None of the Post links in the OP work.

I've memorized the thread.

What are you looking for?

thellama73 wrote:

Jackofhearts2005 wrote:

thellama73 wrote:In answer to Epi's question, my vote for Quin is based on a Day 0 ping, odd, uncharacteristic behavior, which I tend to associate with baddies. I am also perturbed by Quin's unwillingness to take my vote seriously. I never really intended to leave my vote there, though. I haven't decided where to move it yet, but Notsawyer, for being wishy-washy, might get it. And JackofHearts, for being annoying and not answering questions seriously, might get it.

Can you be more specific?

I don't think there's a real question I've been asked that I didn't take seriously.

Convince me you aren't just being opportunistic by saying you might vote for one of the players who already has two votes for no real reason.

This post is pretty flippant, but in fairness to you, I think I keep confusing you with Notsawyer, since I don't know either of you. I can't tell you apart. Please try to be more distinctive.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote:

MacDougall wrote:I don't like the cut of this jackofhearts character's jib. Voting there.

Well I don't like that your avatar is what you'd get if Diablo fucked a sharptooth.

But I don't vote for stupid reason.

thellama73 wrote:And since we're throwing out wild Day 0 accusations, I think Quin is bad.

Quin wrote:

Marmot wrote:

Quin wrote:I would like this FZ. person to check in. I don't think I've played with him before.

FZ is a she, and it's good to have her back.

Are you two teammates?

I don't know, I haven't checked her role card.

thellama73 wrote:

Marmot wrote:

thellama73 wrote:I think it's clear my vote is an ironic one.

I know you can iron pantsuits, but how do you iron honesty?

You don't iron it, but you have to take it out and shake the dust out of it once in a while, Metalmarsh89.

Quin wrote:I would like this FZ. person to check in. I don't think I've played with him before.

thellama73 wrote:I think it's clear my vote is an ironic one.