The Syndicate

Turnip Head wrote:The correct answer here is beef kebobs. You're just getting back to eating solid foods. I feel like you could drink a breakfast burrito through a straw if you really had to, but there's no substitute for beef.

I don't really like beef though. I like fish and vegetables.

Snow Dog wrote:Brain SALAD Surgery

Great album

Silly song

zeek wrote:I am the only person in this game the Cybermen have killed. Weak.

At least you weren't killed by a coin flip.

birdwithteeth11 wrote:

keys56000000000 wrote:Epig2 and MM got 7 votes each

In the event of a civvie vs mafia tie, the civvie dies. Right?

If there is a tie in a lynch, then it's decided at random/by a coin flip who dies.

I called heads though.

Epignosis wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Epignosis wrote:Excellent.

I disagree?

Well done.

Epignosis wrote:Excellent.

I disagree?

birdwithteeth11 wrote:Alright. So because I am a lenient and benevolent host, I just received two more poetry entries. And they were both so entertaining and enjoyable (I won't call you out, but you two know who you are), that I am going to be kind and extend the contest through the end of Night 6. But I still want to see a bit more participation or else there may be punishments dolled out.

birdwithteeth11 wrote:Also, I would like to add that there were a surprisingly significant lack of entries for our contest today. In fact, well over half of the players didn't submit anything (Okay, fine. It was only two people to give you the actual number). We throw out bones to you guys in the form of contests and prizes, and you all don't seem to care.

I never get prizes when I do contests and stuff. I only get punishments, like counting to 5 and being turned into a newt.

Epignosis wrote:Let's assume your theory, that I am now a robot (well...I was a robot but never mind ) is true, and that I had info on Enrique and Made. This means that in three nights, the robot role checker would have had to have checked BOTH Made and Enrique, the latter of whom Ep1 happened to openly suspect- hard. My domain is language, not mathematics, but accounting for deaths and the fact that they wouldn't check their own crew, I estimate that the chance of both checks happening by Day 4 is 4.2%. Of course, that doesn't account for role blocks or the panoply of human interaction over the Internet. Finally, your theory means that I would have had to be willing to tip my hand to accomplish something that would happen without my intervention.

This reminds me of Harry Potter.

I was the civ role checker, and I caught 3 of the 4 baddies in the first 4 nights. I tipped my hand for the first one. She was lynched, I was NK'd that night (as expected), but was rezzed later. I think you know the rest of the story.

Oops. DANA, not Made.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 662#p89662

Well, that's weird.

You know what else is weird, I DID respond to that.

http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 671#p89671

I hope you address this when you come back MP. You kept accusing me of not responding to your defense of Made. I did. I even posted this here post to affirm it. But you seemed to ignore it again. Anyway, it's there. Read it. Acknowledge it. And I'd love to hear your responses.

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:That's why I said "and MM is a Dalek", adding it as an assumption.

At this point, I'm pretty convinced he's bad. Epig 2.0 could be too, but I'd rather see MM flip.

Are you pretty convinced or totally convinced or kinda convinced or what?

These are the same silly arguments you are making against me.

I'm "pretty convinced" is not an argument. It's a statement of fact.

These are arguments as to why I believe you're bad:
http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 053#p90053
http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 840#p89840
http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 786#p89786

Just to name a few.

They state reasons. Your only reasons for suspecting I'm bad lie in Enrique's post suddenly accusing me before his death, after defending me all game. You lump me with Dana, whom you had prior suspicions of, then dropped, then conveniently brought back up.

Consequently, if Dana is a Dalek and the 4th teammate is inactive, that flies completely in the face with your ONLY argument as to why I'm bad. Seriously, you have not given any other actual tangible argument for me being bad.

Therefore, I have absolute reason to believe your feelings against me are fabricated.

Linki: thanks, bea! On that note, going to see what else I can accomplish tonight, see you folks later!

I'm not trying to prove your baddieness at the moment MP. I've been trying to make a defense for myself and state my reasoning for Dana being bad. I'm not trying to lynch several players at one time, because we can only lynch one today.

But your accusations are running rampant MP. Why do you ask me to be more open-minded, but immediately jump on anything that is even remotely different than one particular story you have stuck in your head. It's quite hypocritical of you. But if you want to stick with your tunnel-vision, fine, but don't pretend like it's not there.

MovingPictures07 wrote:That's why I said "and MM is a Dalek", adding it as an assumption.

At this point, I'm pretty convinced he's bad. Epig 2.0 could be too, but I'd rather see MM flip.

Are you pretty convinced or totally convinced or kinda convinced or what?

These are the same silly arguments you are making against me.

Epignosis wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Roxy wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:The dichotomy of the votes being 6-6-2-1-1 this late in the lynch makes me wonder if the two main contenders are either baddies on opposing teams, or if one is baddie and one is civ (if I had to guess here, MM as bad and Epig 2.0 as civ).

Guess we'll see.

It makes me feel like Epi is being saved.

It could be, but if that were the case, and MM is a Dalek, that makes Epig a Cyberman.

I disagree?

Why the question mark?

Because I am uncertain about my alignment and would like to indicate that in a humorous manner?

Then I hope you are laughing as much as I am right now?

Epignosis wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Roxy wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:The dichotomy of the votes being 6-6-2-1-1 this late in the lynch makes me wonder if the two main contenders are either baddies on opposing teams, or if one is baddie and one is civ (if I had to guess here, MM as bad and Epig 2.0 as civ).

Guess we'll see.

It makes me feel like Epi is being saved.

It could be, but if that were the case, and MM is a Dalek, that makes Epig a Cyberman.

I disagree?

Why the question mark?

MovingPictures07 wrote:I'm absolutely confident that I've caught MM in a lie, and I'd like to see him lynched.

If he does flip civvie, I'll be 1,000,000 times more shocked than I was when JC 1.0 got lynched.

You didn't seem surprised when juliets flipped civ.


Linki:

MovingPictures07 wrote:You've said over and over that Dana and I are the remaining Daleks, but here you float a theory in which I am clearly not a Dalek. It's a complete inconsistency and proves that your theory about me being baddie all of a sudden is completely fabricated. Because my baddieness is predicated ENTIRELY on me being a Dalek in your arguments.

I am more convinced about Dana than I am about you. And please show me these statements where I said you are baddie mcbaddersons.

And to the post you were talking about, I was adding a hypothetical addition to your statement. Forgive me for doing such a horrid thing.

MovingPictures07 wrote:Grrrrr, screw productivity. It'll have to wait until after the post is up! I just can't stay focused.

MM, you're a liar. Dana is not a Dalek. And neither am I.

I am not a liar. My uninformed hypothesis is not a lie, but a guess made in an attempt to further my knowledge, based on logic that I have deduced from interactions and observations with other players.

I am not a liar.

I'm moving my vote to Epi. No hard feelings mate, but I don't want to be lynched.

I don't like the way MP left the thread. For any last minute voters popping in, that post will jump to their attention as they scan through and put the spotlight on me. Unfortunately that post doesn't make any sense if you've actually been following the discussion...

Hedgeowl wrote: We think 2 might be dead, but as far as i know thats not certain. So you think Dana and MP are the last two?

Linki what is mp trying to say? Do you mean dana and th are daleks?

I'm certain Dana is a Dalek. I'm entertaining the possibilty that MP is on that team as well. I have no read on TH, but was only responding to MP's post.

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:If she was "hiding", it'd be apparently accomplishing very little. I think if she had baddie teammates they would be prodding her to the thread... and they are not.

How is Dana "hiding", Blooper, and not TH 2.0? He has vanished completely, even though he's been on the site in the last 24 hours.

This was his last post, almost 3 RL days ago:

Turnip Head wrote:Not really caught up enough to make an informed decision on this poll so I voted for the coolest sounding planet

If she has baddie teammates, 2 of them are dead, and the other one might be just as inactive as her.

Dana was under suspicion and TH was not (that I'm aware of), so it made it much easier for TH to fly under the radar if that's what he's going for.

Ha, glad I saw this before leaving!!!

But your entire suspicion of me and Dana is predicated on both of us being Enrique's teammates.

You just contradicted yourself, buddy.

Now, seriously, see you folks later!

I don't understand what you're trying to say here.

But your flamboyant certainty may be the death of me.

MovingPictures07 wrote:Also, sorry if you wanted to discuss more, MM, but I've been swamped and right now I'm only here for a few minutes, just to check in before the poll is over; I have more work I need to complete on this essay.

No worries. If I survive this lynch I want to if you get the time to.

MovingPictures07 wrote:If she was "hiding", it'd be apparently accomplishing very little. I think if she had baddie teammates they would be prodding her to the thread... and they are not.

How is Dana "hiding", Blooper, and not TH 2.0? He has vanished completely, even though he's been on the site in the last 24 hours.

This was his last post, almost 3 RL days ago:

Turnip Head wrote:Not really caught up enough to make an informed decision on this poll so I voted for the coolest sounding planet

If she has baddie teammates, 2 of them are dead, and the other one might be just as inactive as her.

Dana was under suspicion and TH was not (that I'm aware of), so it made it much easier for TH to fly under the radar if that's what he's going for.

Elohcin wrote:I know this is not the best way to go about this, but I am voting for the person I think is least civ rather than more suspicious. *votes MM*

Linki....I still think Dana is bad bad bad too.

Why do you think I am not very civ? And why wouldn't a vote for Dana be a better alternative?

Hedgeowl wrote:The dana votes are bit surprising to me considering the lack of recent conversation about her. It seems like its coming from folks who havent been around as much this weekend. I also wish she would be here to answer some of these thoughts. I find this vote to be very interesting so far between Epi and MM especially as it keeps tying up. I am not sure atm where my vote will go, but should have a wee bit of time to consider some of the cases being made.

I've been pushing the lynching of Dana (as my activity would allow) since Day 3.

Epignosis wrote:

Roxy wrote:If you don't mind I would rather people read MY posts to know why I voted foryou not a carefully worded post you made.

Unusual answer from you inre: sabie.

I don't want people to read your posts. They're threats to my existence.

And yes it was. What could it mean?

What about my existence?

Snow Dog wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:Thanks for clarifying, MM, and I realize you've been busy; I'm not talking about only D6, but fair enough.

You shouldn't expect me to change it, unless you can come up with some amazing reason, because at this point your posts have been increasingly incriminating.

I don't think Enrique's vote was an obvious save attempt at the time, but on reflection, it seems like it was his idea to "save" Made and leave his lynch-stopping power for another day.

I don't think you're realizing that Enrique could not just do a 180 on his opinion of me even if it was the better choice at the time. That's a great example of a baddie getting locked into their opinions, whether they truly believe them or not. So... I don't understand why you're harping on that, since it makes no sense.

I was actually hoping to discuss the Snow Dog lynch with you again, but hopefully another time.

Also he did a 180 on you later, and Dana as well.

I did a 180?

I was referring to Enrique, not you.

Pronouns fail me again.

MovingPictures07 wrote:http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 662#p89662

Well, that's weird.

You know what else is weird, I DID respond to that.

http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 671#p89671

MovingPictures07 wrote:Thanks for clarifying, MM, and I realize you've been busy; I'm not talking about only D6, but fair enough.

You shouldn't expect me to change it, unless you can come up with some amazing reason, because at this point your posts have been increasingly incriminating.

I don't think Enrique's vote was an obvious save attempt at the time, but on reflection, it seems like it was his idea to "save" Made and leave his lynch-stopping power for another day.

I don't think you're realizing that Enrique could not just do a 180 on his opinion of me even if it was the better choice at the time. That's a great example of a baddie getting locked into their opinions, whether they truly believe them or not. So... I don't understand why you're harping on that, since it makes no sense.

I was actually hoping to discuss the Snow Dog lynch with you again, but hopefully another time.

Also he did a 180 on you later, and Dana as well.

MovingPictures07 wrote:MM, here is my major defense of Dana, but I have had other posts that have defended her: viewtopic.php?f=60&t=445&p=89662#p89662

And you say you don't want to get "caught up" with this sort of thing and that I wouldn't back out now, but here's the thing: I gave you plenty of time to defend your actions, and you have not offered any adequate explanations at all for the main tenants of my suspicion against you. I've defended myself against my accusers plenty, including you, yet you don't consider alternative explanations. And you're going to try to argue that I wouldn't back out? I'm baddie hunting. I've backed off cases where defenders have logically torn apart my arguments against them and reconsidered PLENTY of times this game, so much in fact that it was a major point of suspicion against me. So... your point is invalid. If you had what I found to be adequate explanations for your behavior, I'd believe you. And I didn't start out "99%" certain, but as you've continued to post and I've analyzed your behavior, I'm sorry, but so many things you've done just do not compute if you are a civvie this game.

Before I read that let me explain. Those are two different things.

I did not want to get caught up in getting heated and throwing insults back and forth at each other. It seemed like our conversation might have been heading that direction and I wanted to stop it.

That next bit is about your read on me. I don't expect you to change it. I really don't. You can keep saying that I have the ability to change your mind, but you keep following it up with statements that your certainty of my alignment (you did it again in the above quote). Also let me point this post out. You may have had time to sit and wait for a response, but I haven't necessarily had time to post one.

Linki: You stated somewhere (or maybe it was Epi) that Enrique's vote was an obvious save attempt. That doesn't make any sense to me. You would have been the better choice at the time.

Quick question for you MP, why do you think Enrique voted for Snow Dog and not you on Day 3? At the time of his vote, you had 3 votes on you while Snow Dog had one, and Made had 5.

Also, in regards to Epi: I am not ignoring that issue, but I am pursuing other things right now.

MovingPictures07 wrote:I'm even now willing to hear you out, but you continuously refuse to contribute anything other than irrational fixation on one post Enrique made which does not hold up to scrutiny.

I honestly don't think you are. I think you are saying that to justify being critical of my statements even more. You've said many times today that you are 99% sure, convinced and certain that I am a Dalek. I don't think you'd back out on it now.

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:But I think MM needs to go first, he's really seeming an obvious baddie right now.

How close-minded of you.

Lol.

I've been anything BUT closed-minded, and I'm even now willing to hear you out, but you continuously refuse to contribute anything other than irrational fixation on one post Enrique made which does not hold up to scrutiny.

Oh really.

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Long Con wrote:But I can also envision a scenario where you are the teammate, and that whole description you just posted was planned by you and Enrique in a rough way before Enrique's first post in the series. WIFOM by definition, but that doesn't mean it didn't happen.

I still believe you're civ for reasons I stated earlier, but I just thought I'd share another point of view.

Fair enough. Not true, but sometimes playing devil's advocate is helpful, especially since I realize I can get tunnel vision quite often.

I'll let my thoughts on MM sit since I realize I may be feeling vindicated in error on it, and I'd like others to actually offer me feedback, but I do find his actions suspicious.

I don't want to get caught up in this sort of thing if that's alright with you.

As for the Enrique bit, well that actually reinforced the case I made on Dana before. It is not the centerpiece of my argument, but it provided an additional layer.

Also I'm actually trying to find your defense of Dana. Could you save me the trouble and link it for me?

MovingPictures07 wrote:But I think MM needs to go first, he's really seeming an obvious baddie right now.

How close-minded of you.

MovingPictures07 wrote:Also, I do agree it's odd that he didn't name hardly any suspects in his analysis, mostly people he thought were good or likely good.

Hey, that sounds a lot like Dana...

Linki: I haven't gotten around to reading it yet, but I will now. I think you've got the wrong adjective there. And because I've got a strong suspicion that you and Dana or on a baddie team together (with Enrique), I'm taking whatever you say with a grain of salt.

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

S~V~S wrote:Although I think Metalmarsh would be OK as well. I think he is a Dalek.

I am not a Dalek.

I am not a Cyberman.

I am not a robot.

This would break the game if these were checkable statements.

Frankly, I don't understand the obsession with the checkable LD statements. No host in their right mind would allow these kinds of statements to be checked.

Changing your avatar every 5 minutes will break the game.

I'm not familiar with the intricacies of the lie-detector. I've never hosted a game where that role has been used, nor do I think I've played in one before this one.

I'm voting Dana. I doubt you'll go along with me though.

Linki: makes sense.

S~V~S wrote:Although I think Metalmarsh would be OK as well. I think he is a Dalek.

I am not a Dalek.

I am not a Cyberman.

I am not a robot.

thellama73 wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

birdwithteeth11 wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:
On it. Figured I would make an official proposal if I liked what I found, but you and Logan ninja'd me before I could even decide whether I thought it was worth proposing.

So when do I get a title? You should get on that and give me something funny/creative. You slacker. :P

I'm not changing titles, only colors.

Only I get a creative title. :P Also, I have decided that I prefer the purple to the old color. Celebrations all round.

You're not the only one.

Busy day yesterday, but I'll be back and posting this morning.

Long Con wrote:It makes the most sense if Enrique named two Civvies and one teammate, actually.

Why's that? I don't think the pattern of the alignments are as important here as the relationships between the players before such a statement.

Linki: Okay, I see you're open to interpretation. If you think MP is civ, why'd you vote him Day 3?

birdwithteeth11 wrote:Alright. So here's the deal. I literally just got home from work. I go back in early in the morning (off at 11 and back in at 8 w00t!), and I'm utterly exhausted. The last thing I have the time or energy for right now is making a night post, a lynch poll, and sending out PMs. So I apologize for this, but the night post probably won't be coming until around 6PM EST tomorrrow, unless bea manages to throw one up before then. I apologize to everyone for this, but I can't handle it right now due to lack of energy. Also, if you did not send in a PM, this does NOT mean you have an extension of time. I will still only count PMs and votes that came in before the deadline.

I will catch up tomorrow and get back on track then, but for now I just need to sleep. Sorry everyone!

Cat town, here we come.

Alright MP, I will quote (properly) and address everything I feel necessary.

MovingPictures07 wrote:------ He interacts with and quotes Enrique's posts more than anyone else by far. Just a few examples (and others permeating throughout this recap):
http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 940#p85940
http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 981#p85981
http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 178#p86178
http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 179#p86179

Over the Day 5 phase, yes, you might be right. Not many people were discussing, and I happened to catch Enrique at the tale end of the day. I was trying to get as much interaction with him as I could before he might die in case it might help my knowledge later on.

MovingPictures07 wrote:------------- He said he thought my interaction with Dana to be strange, when she defended Enrique after I went after him:
http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 195#p85195

Actually, thank you very much for bringing this up again. Here's yet another piece of the Dana-MP-Enrique puzzle.

MovingPictures07 wrote:------------- He wanted answers from zeek regarding N1 poll and implied that he was bothered when he didn't get them, but doesn't really say zeek is bad:
http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 206#p86206

I voted zeek the following day, and he gave me a sufficient answer at the time. Next.

MovingPictures07 wrote:------------- First real suspicion post, D2 he says he's going to vote Sabie or Elo, then votes Elo, and explains it was due to D1 vote when I questioned later:
http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 605#p86605
http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 678#p86678

It wasn't a real suspicion, but it did happen.

MovingPictures07 wrote:------------- Despite that, he notes here that "not a single player I feel good about lynching right now" and says it was the primary reason he voted for Elo:
http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 672#p86672

There ya go.

MovingPictures07 wrote:------ D3, thinks survived NKs are fishy, states he has been getting civvie vibes from me in general:
http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 404#p87404

I was getting civvie vibes from you, and have for most of the game. Maybe I'm just not good at reading you though. Anyway, I found your explanation for surviving the NK to be acceptable.

MovingPictures07 wrote:------ D3, thinks DF had some sound points and agrees with me on a couple of quiet players, then contrasts it... reads kind of odd but IDK what if it means anything now:
http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 736#p87735
http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 736#p87736

Just a matter of responding to one post before reading another, hence the bizarre sequence.

MovingPictures07 wrote:------ D3, suddenly he has a lot to say about Dana and thinks she should be lynched:
http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 834#p87834

I'd pointed Dana out a couple times before, but finally put together a case (kind of like your post here on me, actually). But yes, it was a result of keeping an eye on her and then suddenly realizing that her behavior read very go-alongish.

MovingPictures07 wrote:------ D3: Here's where it gets weird, SVS points out Made's behavior is different and MM flip flops, then tries to get me to vote Made even though he would prefer a Snow Dog lynch... this is definitely some of MM's most suspicious behavior:
http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 108#p88108
http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 115#p88115
http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 122#p88122
http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 137#p88137
http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 154#p88154

That was indeed a choice I've been wondering about since that time. I do not regret the fact that Snow Dog was lynched, even though he was civ, but I do regret that Made was not lynched (effectively). But It was a bad predicament to begin with. I could have easily left my vote on Dana and walked away, but I wasn't happy with the fact that everyone's votes were so scattered. ELEVEN players received votes that day, and that's only including the final tally. It was late in the day, so I decided to take it upon myself to put my vote in a more apt position. I tried justifying it, but I had only a few minutes for that. Just after I do that and place my vote on Made you and Dana happen along and place your votes on Snow Dog (within 2 minutes of the deadline I might add). Since I was more convinced about Snow Dog than Made, it was a dream come true. But that wasn't the case. Snow Dog was good, Enrique immediately began pointing fingers (which you forgot to mention THAT interaction), and I thought I was a dead duck. But now I think differently.

MovingPictures07 wrote:------ D4, he self-votes... and then he says he "thought about voting for Enrique but decided not to". Really suspicious considering what happened that day... and just sort of odd.
http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 903#p88903
http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 903#p88904
http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 156#p89156

MovingPictures07 wrote:------- D5: Says he explained his vote from D4... but IMO his explanation is just not much of one
http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 399#p89399

I hope you drop this whole bit. Like I tried to explain in one post, I was in the car and didn't have the capacity to read and respond and make an educated vote. While I did want to vote Enrique, I decided not to because I didn't have the ability at the time to justify it. Not because I there was no reason to vote him, but because service was not good in the area. You try playing mafia in the middle of the high deserts of Oregon.

I did actually place my vote on Enrique before changing my mind. That's why Chris made that post, and that's why I very briefly explained what had happened, and that's also why Enrique responded strangely. It was Dom's "random" vote all over again.

MovingPictures07 wrote:------- D5: This post is really suspicious to me, the way it's worded and the fact that he wonders if Enrique is throwing his teammates under the bus even though MM has thought I'm civvie all game is just weird, especially since he felt the need to clarify in the second post:
http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 533#p89533
http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 534#p89534

Well, considering you are one of the suspects, it's no wonder you don't like this piece here.

MovingPictures07 wrote:------- D5: Attempts to revisit Dana particularly after Enrique's posts switching his opinion on her... but I think this focus is odd because he never responds to the fact that I explain why I think she's good, at all, and he completely dropped her from that post on D3 where he found her pretty suspicious until just after Enrique died again.
http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 671#p89671

Enrique's change of opinion makes no sense. He blames Dana for setting him up. Dana didn't make a single post Day 5, and did not voice a single suspicion of him before that. So that's a load of horse poo. He blames you for setting him up too, but he was already set up before you had anything to do with it today. Like I said, I'm convinced it was hardcore XXX uncensored distancing.

I wasn't around Day 4, so I could hardly revisit anything.

MovingPictures07 wrote:------- N5: Doesn't really address my intense defense of Dana and says he thinks Dana is bad and I'm not because she was not trying to actively lynch Enrique... but most of the game, I wasn't either. Then he throws in that he's reconsidering me and drops the Enrique distancing theory again:
http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 675#p89675

Thanks for posting this MP, you now have me convinced that you and Dana are on Enrique's team.

I switched my vote to Darillium because the background sounds more friendly than Vulcan.

Linki: lol, I TRY to read every one of your posts thoroughly the first time so I don't have to spend an eternity going back to reread. That doesn't mean I won't, but I am also a student and also usually have better things to do.

MovingPictures07 wrote:Now that I just got home, I will look at MM as well.

I look forward to it.

Chris wrote:I'm a staunch defender of Epig? LOL!

Please site your references!

I'm all for a MM lynch, since I also think he's bad.

Ooh, ooh, maybe you'll do the same?

Roxy wrote:MP - Chris is playing like always. Hard headed and unwilling to listen or discuss the possibility he is and has been misguided. if I can get enough people to actually take time and look at Epi leading up to and during the Made/Enrique lynches and agree that he must be the cyber role check or is on the same team as the role checker then I would know more on where I stand with Chris as he has been a staunch defender of Epi. Along with Metal.

MP LINky ffs no!

I have not defended Epi though, if that's what you're implying.