The Syndicate

I swear the quote-fail wasn't my fault this time.

Chris wrote:
Well, one was a baddie, and one is probably a baddie. Enrique's last-ditch comment about Dana looked like distancing to me. There's also the fact that he claimed that she was innocent earlier in the game, but she is suddenly bad because she is trying to lynch him, who is a baddie. I've pointed out reasons why I think Dana is bad, and I'm willing to revisit them.
[quoteWell, between Made and Enrique, one was a baddie, and one is probably a baddie. Enrique's last-ditch comment about Dana looked like distancing to me. There's also the fact that he claimed that she was innocent earlier in the game, but she is suddenly not so civ because she is trying to lynch him, who is a baddie. I've pointed out reasons why I think Dana is bad, and I'm willing to revisit them.

Does this look to anyone else like MM put the first part in his post in between MPs quotes, then decided to ask his team how it sounds, made changes, then pasted in at the bottom, forgetting to remove the first version?[/quote]

I was going to respond to the post piece-by-piece, but decided to group it all at the bottom since it was all relevant. And then I bombed the whole quote thing.

Btw, when I am bad (or have BTSC at all), I don't ask for input on what to say.

MovingPictures07 wrote:MM, if Enrique's recent posts make you think he is distancing from Dana, why not from me?

How much more clear do I have to be? Dana is not bad.

Because Dana has not been trying to lynch Enrique while you have. However, I am reconsidering my view on you, because frankly I do think Enrique could be right that you two are teammates, but not because he wanted to be right.

Ugh, quote fail. This one will work.

MovingPictures07 wrote:Alright, I have a bit of time here in between working on assignments, and I've been working on them way too long, so I wanted to craft a response.

Re: Dana, since people asked for clarification: I am confident that she is civvie this game. Even though I don’t know her super well just yet, I have interacted with her enough inside and outside of mafia to believe that she would be acting incredibly differently if she were baddie, and that she is generally really horrible at withholding the truth (I would say ask DH, Enrique, and Made for corroboration here, since they know her better than I do, but the first isn’t playing and the latter two are baddies, so...).

I definitely believe her defenses of Made and Enrique, while misguided, were genuine, because she saw hardly any reason to think either of her friends were bad at the junctions of the game where she issued her opinions. I additionally believe this because of the way Enrique casually and even intensely defended me and Dana all throughout the game for logical reasons, then near the end when he knew he was an inevitable lynch, turned around and said he agreed with us and defended us all game because we were on the same page, when that is simply not the case (anyone remember how Dana and I had a back and forth regarding Enrique, or how I attacked Enrique and disagreed with him vehemently about Epig? for just two examples). Consequently, the push by MM to look at Dana which he has been trying to accomplish for some time convinces me further of this (but I will examine this further when I go back to look at MM's posts). Dana's attempts to discern baddie and civvie behavior this game, as well as her decoding, have struck me as absolutely genuine. Additionally, her absence is not uncharacteristic; I believe she is keeping busy with college and in addition she seems she can sometimes be shy but other times is not afraid to say on her mind, and as it applies to mafia I think it just depends on if she feels she can contribute. Anyone who wants proof should refer to Monty Python, where in the midpoint of the game for a significant period of time, she became very quiet, and when things slowed down, she fluctuated back to being active, and actually took the leading role for a few cycles, until her unexpected death. She was a civvie there. Consequently, she has given me no reason to believe she is baddie whatsoever and I believe examining her for baddie behavior is definitively misguided. Hope this helps.

I know I was not saving Made, and I incredibly strongly believe Dana was not. MM very well could have been, and I think he was. Enrique obviously was. Gotrees IDK but my eye is on him.

S~V~S, first, I have a question for you: What do you think of Roxy? Second, let me repeat: Your suspicion of me is ironic. Just think about that. Please reconsider. Your gut is wrong about me. You were right in your gut about me earlier on, and just because I believed Snow Dog to be bad doesn’t make me bad (nor Dana, for that matter). It means I was wrong. Seriously think about how it was to be on my team in WWE and all the countless games you’ve seen me play as a baddie and ask yourself if I would vote the way I did on D3 and D4 if I were Made’s teammate. If anyone was trying to save Made on D3, it was Enrique, MM, and maybe Gotrees. Enrique should be evident now that we know his role and how he voted on D4.

Seriously, think about this and ask yourself when I would ever defend a teammate like this. Never. THEN consider that I survived a kill attempt by the Cybermen so I cannot be on that team.

And if you doubt it, lynch me. I still feel conflicted about it, but at least you’d all learn something valuable.

I don't have the time until tonight, but I am pretty sure at that time I will be finally able to set aside some time to thoroughly go through MM's posts, and I've been wanting to for a while, so I will be doing so. I have mentioned throughout the game that some of his posts have bugged me, and his interactions with Enrique and Made right up until the end make me think he's the strongest lead we have right now for a Dalek teammate, though even if he's not I think he could be bad regardless. Thus, I feel he needs to be fairly examined, and I understand why he feels the way he does because no formal, comprehensive case has been brought. So if my analysis of his posts later tonight agrees with my nagging thoughts of him (or not), then you'll certainly be hearing from me about it sometime tonight either way, when I'm less busy.

Linki: Chris, try going through Dana's or Metalmarsh's posts. The most updated decoding for the baddie roles should be in either of those posts, I think. Looks like Rox beat me to it.

Linki: Rox, what do you think of MM?

See you folks later.

Well, between Made and Enrique, one was a baddie, and one is probably a baddie. Enrique's last-ditch comment about Dana looked like distancing to me. There's also the fact that he claimed that she was innocent earlier in the game, but she is suddenly not so civ because she is trying to lynch him, who is a baddie. I've pointed out reasons why I think Dana is bad, and I'm willing to revisit them. For a long time, she wasn't very proactive, latching on to other ideas and agreeing with everyone. Ever since I made the case against her, she has become extremely quiet. I don't know if these are coincidental or not. But the other thing about this quietness is that it makes even less sense for Enrique to call Dana out for 'setting him up' when she hasn't even made a single post today, nor has she tried to advocate his lynch at all. Given the choice between Made and Enrique on Day 4, she voted Made because she felt good about Enrique.

Oh, and then there's that strange post regarding Snow Dog's return to the game in another role.

S~V~S wrote:
Dana wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:
Hedgeowl wrote:Welcome back Snowy! What are your thoughts on the last lynch?
Good one.
I think I was surprised. But more thoughts later on how it went down and the reasons for my voting pattern.
Is Snow Dog 2.0 allowed to talk as or give explanations for Snow Dog 1.0? I'm kind of actually really confused about the people replacing that were already previously in the game. Of course they get new roles and such, but they're still the same person with the same play style and all of that. What are the rules for this? As in, what are they allowed to do or say or talk about?
Why should he be restricted?

This post has a "sour grapes" feel to it, IMO. Like you are annoyed that Snowy did not stay dead.

MovingPictures07 wrote:Alright, I have a bit of time here in between working on assignments, and I've been working on them way too long, so I wanted to craft a response.

Re: Dana, since people asked for clarification: I am confident that she is civvie this game. Even though I don’t know her super well just yet, I have interacted with her enough inside and outside of mafia to believe that she would be acting incredibly differently if she were baddie, and that she is generally really horrible at withholding the truth (I would say ask DH, Enrique, and Made for corroboration here, since they know her better than I do, but the first isn’t playing and the latter two are baddies, so...).

Well, one was a baddie, and one is probably a baddie. Enrique's last-ditch comment about Dana looked like distancing to me. There's also the fact that he claimed that she was innocent earlier in the game, but she is suddenly bad because she is trying to lynch him, who is a baddie. I've pointed out reasons why I think Dana is bad, and I'm willing to revisit them.

MovingPictures07 wrote:I definitely believe her defenses of Made and Enrique, while misguided, were genuine, because she saw hardly any reason to think either of her friends were bad at the junctions of the game where she issued her opinions. I additionally believe this because of the way Enrique casually and even intensely defended me and Dana all throughout the game for logical reasons, then near the end when he knew he was an inevitable lynch, turned around and said he agreed with us and defended us all game because we were on the same page, when that is simply not the case (anyone remember how Dana and I had a back and forth regarding Enrique, or how I attacked Enrique and disagreed with him vehemently about Epig? for just two examples). Consequently, the push by MM to look at Dana which he has been trying to accomplish for some time convinces me further of this (but I will examine this further when I go back to look at MM's posts).

But he didn't do that MP. I reread Enrique's posts

Dana's attempts to discern baddie and civvie behavior this game, as well as her decoding, have struck me as absolutely genuine. Additionally, her absence is not uncharacteristic; I believe she is keeping busy with college and in addition she seems she can sometimes be shy but other times is not afraid to say on her mind, and as it applies to mafia I think it just depends on if she feels she can contribute. Anyone who wants proof should refer to Monty Python, where in the midpoint of the game for a significant period of time, she became very quiet, and when things slowed down, she fluctuated back to being active, and actually took the leading role for a few cycles, until her unexpected death. She was a civvie there. Consequently, she has given me no reason to believe she is baddie whatsoever and I believe examining her for baddie behavior is definitively misguided. Hope this helps.

I know I was not saving Made, and I incredibly strongly believe Dana was not. MM very well could have been, and I think he was. Enrique obviously was. Gotrees IDK but my eye is on him.

S~V~S, first, I have a question for you: What do you think of Roxy? Second, let me repeat: Your suspicion of me is ironic. Just think about that. Please reconsider. Your gut is wrong about me. You were right in your gut about me earlier on, and just because I believed Snow Dog to be bad doesn’t make me bad (nor Dana, for that matter). It means I was wrong. Seriously think about how it was to be on my team in WWE and all the countless games you’ve seen me play as a baddie and ask yourself if I would vote the way I did on D3 and D4 if I were Made’s teammate. If anyone was trying to save Made on D3, it was Enrique, MM, and maybe Gotrees. Enrique should be evident now that we know his role and how he voted on D4.

Seriously, think about this and ask yourself when I would ever defend a teammate like this. Never. THEN consider that I survived a kill attempt by the Cybermen so I cannot be on that team.

And if you doubt it, lynch me. I still feel conflicted about it, but at least you’d all learn something valuable.

I don't have the time until tonight, but I am pretty sure at that time I will be finally able to set aside some time to thoroughly go through MM's posts, and I've been wanting to for a while, so I will be doing so. I have mentioned throughout the game that some of his posts have bugged me, and his interactions with Enrique and Made right up until the end make me think he's the strongest lead we have right now for a Dalek teammate, though even if he's not I think he could be bad regardless. Thus, I feel he needs to be fairly examined, and I understand why he feels the way he does because no formal, comprehensive case has been brought. So if my analysis of his posts later tonight agrees with my nagging thoughts of him (or not), then you'll certainly be hearing from me about it sometime tonight either way, when I'm less busy.

Linki: Chris, try going through Dana's or Metalmarsh's posts. The most updated decoding for the baddie roles should be in either of those posts, I think. Looks like Rox beat me to it.

Linki: Rox, what do you think of MM?

See you folks later.[/quote]

Well, between Made and Enrique, one was a baddie, and one is probably a baddie. Enrique's last-ditch comment about Dana looked like distancing to me. There's also the fact that he claimed that she was innocent earlier in the game, but she is suddenly not so civ because she is trying to lynch him, who is a baddie. I've pointed out reasons why I think Dana is bad, and I'm willing to revisit them. For a long time, she wasn't very proactive, latching on to other ideas and agreeing with everyone. Ever since I made the case against her, she has become extremely quiet. I don't know if these are coincidental or not. But the other thing about this quietness is that it makes even less sense for Enrique to call Dana out for 'setting him up' when she hasn't even made a single post today, nor has she tried to advocate his lynch at all. Given the choice between Made and Enrique on Day 4, she voted Made because she felt good about Enrique.

Oh, and then there's that strange post regarding Snow Dog's return to the game in another role.

S~V~S wrote:
Dana wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:
Hedgeowl wrote:Welcome back Snowy! What are your thoughts on the last lynch?
Good one.
I think I was surprised. But more thoughts later on how it went down and the reasons for my voting pattern.
Is Snow Dog 2.0 allowed to talk as or give explanations for Snow Dog 1.0? I'm kind of actually really confused about the people replacing that were already previously in the game. Of course they get new roles and such, but they're still the same person with the same play style and all of that. What are the rules for this? As in, what are they allowed to do or say or talk about?
Why should he be restricted?

This post has a "sour grapes" feel to it, IMO. Like you are annoyed that Snowy did not stay dead.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Dalek Sec wrote:If someone targets a member of your team with a night action, you can conduct a -a----- experiment on them. A coin is then tossed. If heads, the night action --e- --t---- and you flip a coin again. If tails, nothing happens. If the coin lands heads on the second flip, that player will not be able to effectively target your team in any way (--t---e -- ----- --te-) for the remainder of the game. If tails, the night action stops --e- --t----, but there are no other effects.

Here's what I had as of the beginning of Day 5 Chris.

And while I have made progress on some civvie roles, I have no intention of revealing those at this moment.

Roxy wrote:Wasn't sure what to expect - but I kinda expected this bc Epi said as much.

Epi your turn next.

You planning on lynching him?

I voted Vulcan until I do some research.

Epignosis wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Enrique wrote:I can't be sure if it's plural, but I figured? Weeping Angel, Lucy Saxon, one more space. I don't think The Valeyard is in the game.

So much more I wanna add but I don't wanna mess up even more

@MP: Sorry for the stressful last few days, look forward to playing with you again!
I'm curious why you don't think the Valeyard is a role.
I'm curious why you posed a question like this to the condemned just moments before he was doomed.

You'll get the same response I got.

I am glad I followed that wagon. RIP Enrique, and see you in future endeavors.

Enrique wrote:I can't be sure if it's plural, but I figured? Weeping Angel, Lucy Saxon, one more space. I don't think The Valeyard is in the game.

So much more I wanna add but I don't wanna mess up even more

@MP: Sorry for the stressful last few days, look forward to playing with you again!

I'm curious why you don't think the Valeyard is a role.

Enrique wrote:Well, guys, this is it. Sorry I sucked so much in this game. I was actually trying to be a good civvie, I swear! I was screwed the moment it became me vs Made, but ah well. Lots of fun! Thanks Bea and BWT for the great game. I died wayyy too early in Monty Python, and now I'm completely addicted to Mafia again I don't know if I want to play two games at once, but whether it's in Zelda or Monopoly, you'll see me again soon.

i herd da rumor dat The Weeping Angels are in the game. I don't know what they do, but beware them.

Are you sure about the Weeping Angels? I recall two hidden roles being mentioned by players, and I think that only leaves one more unknown.

Turnip Head wrote:How many people played the previously mentioned game where MP asked to be lynched and flipped civ? I feel like that's important to note. How many people have seen this "move" from him before.

I'm not knowledgeable of this game. I thought he was civ before he asked for the noose.

Epignosis wrote:
Enrique wrote:What am I gonna do after I die in this game
Sign up for The Legend of Zelda: Ganon's Conquest.

That's one big speed game. I'm still in.

Enrique wrote:I've continued to mention MM in my posts, sorry if I'm not as convinced about him as you.

That's the problem. Several people are "mentioning" me, but nothing more than, "Oh, he might be bad". No quotes, no research, not even a smilie. If I am actually lynched tomorrow I hope you ACTUALLY do some real work on it this time instead of the ol' "Oh, he might be bad". Well maybe not you Enrique, but others. /rant

Linki: I'm in.

Wow, that came out backwards. I wonder if you are in fact, distancing hard.

Enrique wrote:Oh man what? I thought I'd already responded today. Sorry, so many naps and dreams confuse the brain.

Well I'm fucked for today, that's clear for all to see. How many of these votes do you think are just trying to blend in? Alex wanted to steer you guys away from him, and he did it. There's no way all these people thought I was bad, or that I was their prime suspect.

I was set up by MP+Made, possibly Dana. Just remember that.

Dana is my next option.

And I do wonder if you are bad, and in fact throwing all of your teammates under the bus.

Enrique wrote:juliets, SVS, DF, Dom, MM, Roxy. I haven't caught up and at this point it seems totally moot, but are you sure you actually changed your minds? Because I wouldn't have expected any of you to vote for me if there hadn't been this massive push

My vote is not final until the polls ends, and I know that you know this very well.

But I was thrown by the way you made an arrival to the thread at the tail end of Day 3, as I said when it happened. But the thing that has influenced my decision the most are the options today. You've been made into the unanimous option by a lot of players, and I also think MP is good, so my vote will definitely not go there, even if he asks for it. If I thought you were good, I would vote differently, but I don't have that feeling. Sorry.

Epignosis wrote:
Roxy wrote:I am voting Enrique. If he shows as the role Epi said then I will be voting Epi until either him or me is dead.
Oh? What role was that?

If you are right, you must be bad? I'm don't follow this.

I don't see a point in voting anyone else right now. Enrique is getting my vote.

I'm still gonna go back and do a reread of Enrique.

juliets wrote:Thanks a lot MM and Dana and zeek and Long Con and anyone else that helped with decoding. I am a complete fail at it and usually don't play games that have it because as a civ who can't do it you never know what the civ roles say. But that sneaky bea and bwt slipped them in after the game started! So many thanks for those who picked up the slack and did the decoding. If I forgot your name speak up so I know who I'm thanking.

Thanks. zeek got some great starts I think, which allowed me (and others) to finish things up. There's still the Dalek Sec which I am at a loss on right now.

Epignosis wrote:I apologize for being unable to vote or respond today. The previous page was blocked at work due to language.

Voting Enrique.

oops

BWT, if you're still accepting guesses, here's one.

The Master wrote:The first three attempts on his life will be blocked. Every night, he attempts to find Lucy Saxon, his wife/companion. If he finds her, they gain BTSC. Due to his strong ability as a hypnotist, once in the game he can force every night action that night to be randomly redirected to someone other than the original target. This is up to and including kill attempts.

Looks like the only possibilities are hypnotist or spiritist.

The Master's wiki mentions hypnotism a couple times

Dalek Sec wrote:If someone targets a member of your team with a night action, you can conduct a -a----- experiment on them. A coin is then tossed. If heads, the night action --e- --t---- and you flip a coin again. If tails, nothing happens. If the coin lands heads on the second flip, that player will not be able to effectively target your team in any way (--t---e -- ----- --te-) for the remainder of the game. If tails, the night action stops --e- --t----, but there are no other effects.

The Master wrote:The first three attempts on his life will be blocked. Every night, he attempts to find Lucy Saxon, his wife/companion. If he finds her, they gain BTSC. Due to his strong ability as a -----t--t, once in the game he can force every night action that night to be randomly redirected to someone other than the original target. This is up to and including kill attempts.

So I guess the last word still isn't scientist. I'll do some more research, unless someone else has an idea.

Here's the updated secrets of what I have on the last two role secrets.

Dalek Sec wrote:If someone targets a member of your team w--- a night action, you can conduct a -a----- experiment on them. A coin is then tossed. If heads, the night action --e- --t---- and you flip a coin again. If tails, nothing happens. If the coin lands heads on the second flip, that player will not be able to effectively target your team in any way (--t---e -- ----- --te-) for the remainder of the game. If tails, the night action stops --e- --t----, but there are no other effects.

The first word has got to be "with", but there is no 't'. I don't think we've made any progress on the rest.

The Master wrote:The first three attempts on his life will be blocked. Every night, he attempts to find Lucy Saxon, his wife/----a-----. If he finds her, they gain BTSC. -e- to his strong ability as a -----t--t, once in the game he can force every night action that night to be randomly -e-----te- to someone other than the original target. This is up to and including kill attempts.

I still think companion is the first word, but there is an extra space. We originally had "Due" for the second word, but the placement of the 'e' cancels that possibility. We had "scientist" as the third word, but without an 'e', that makes that impossible. We also had "redirected" for the fourth clue, but again, we are one 'e' short, but I don't know what else will fit.

MovingPictures07 wrote:JC, I would not at this moment crusade MM to be bad, but he has performed actions all game off and on that have been suspicious, the most recent of which was his vote yesterday. Frankly, I just don't trust him (yet). Whenever I do get enough time, I'll look over his posts. I recommend others do the same. I also find it VERY odd how Enrique gunned really hard at MM after the Snow Dog lynch and has since backed off completely, when other support for an MM lynch vanished.

My vote yesterday? I self-voted yesterday and explained it, I don't know what you're curious about.

MovingPictures07 wrote:One last thing though, I'm seriously curious as to why I appear to have more outspoken defenders now than I have previously. If anyone could elaborate on that, that'd be great.

Also, even though I think Enri should go today, it'd be nice to discuss other suspects, as S~V~S stated, especially since the +1 is gone. I do not believe Dana and Daisy warrant any attention, however, but Metalmarsh surely should.

Because I was your first outspoken defender?

This thread is filling with fuck fuck fuckkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I love you all by the way. Bea, you should have accepted my challenge.

MovingPictures07 wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:Can you at least sub out MP?
It's not purely an RL move, trust me. If it were, I would have asked to be replaced. I have every intention of fulfilling my duties this game. I just am simultaneously proving a point (and providing information), confirming my civvieness, and I promise the damage will be minimal.

Anyone can see that I'm an inevitable lynch candidate, and I've thought about it a lot, and I need to go now. Not later.

Linki: Dom, I have my reasons. Just trust me on this.

How many baddies have we actually, definitely killed? And you want to go tossing yourself away? RL aside, I don't think that's a good move.

Can you at least sub out MP?

Chris wrote:
Dom wrote:
Chris wrote:This:
Chris wrote:I hear ya MetalMarsh... I'm torn too...
was a response to seeing MM do this:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:I thought about voting Enrique but decided not to.
He had voted Rico, which I notcied because he voted as soon as I voted Rico, and it made me think about changing my mind. Then I saw that he took it off, and voted himself. A move I found somewhat odd, so I tried to engage him in conversation about it.

He didn't respond.

Oh, would you look at that, I responded to Dom's hilarious claim after all...
I didn't claim you didn't??
Here's my beef:
How did you post this:
Chris wrote:I hear ya MetalMarsh... I'm torn too...

I want to add:

DISCLAIMER: I reserve the right to change my vote to whomever I chose, at will.

Linki @ Rico: No... not yet anyway.
In response to this:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:I thought about voting Enrique but decided not to.
When your post came 4 minutes before MMs?
Am I missing something? If I am, please tell me.
Wut?

As I explained in a post before that you didn't bother to read, I saw that he changed his vote, right after I changed mine. I was watching the votes because I just changed mine, cuz, yanno, it was close and all, and I didn't have a very good feeling about it. I saw that he had voted right after me, and then a few minutes later, he changed it to himself.

I SAW HIM CHANGE HIS VOTE, AND I TOO FELT CONFLICTED.

If you want to continue thinking that I screwed up, and that I'm everyone's teammate in the game, I can't stop you from thinking that. I have no other explanation that I can offer, and if you don't want to believe it, then oh well...

I can vouch for him Dom; I voted Enrique, and then switched. My posts came later because I was doing everything from my phone with bad service. Anyway, Chris deserves no flak here.

MovingPictures07 wrote:
Turnip Head wrote:
Made wrote:BALLER, I know why i lived.
Now here's where shit hits the fan. Stand by.
this should be good
Indeed, I'm really awaiting this.

Checking in after much driving before I hit the sack.

You people are hilarious. I look forward to rejoining the action tomorrow.

I thought about voting Enrique but decided not to.

Placing my vote from my phone on the road. I don't have time to read and respond due to limited service and driving, so I'm self-voting. Thanks everyone for not trying to lynch me today (yet...).

I've updated the role information we have with w's. The Dalek Sec lost a couple of "will"s, but the Master remained unchanged/

Dalek Sec wrote: If someone targets a member of your team wiTh a night action, you can conduct a -a--ing? experiment on them. A coin is then tossed. If heads, the night action will --t---- and you flip a coin again. If tails, nothing happens. If the coin lands heads on the second flip, that player ---- not be able to effectively target your team in any -a- (nothing is ----- --t--) for the remainder of the game. If tails, the night action stops ---- --t----, but there are no other effects.

The Master wrote: The first three attempts on his life will be blocked. Every night, he attempts to find Lucy Saxon, his wife/----a-----[companion?]. If he finds her, they gain BTSC. Due to his strong ability as a scientist, once in the game he can block[?] every night action that night to be randomly redirected at someone other than the original target. This is up to and including kill attempts.

keys56000000000 wrote:I ain't gonna lie, it's a little too quiet without MP posting..

I just ran a race today. While I am just lazing around right now, I'm too tired to try and make any quality mafia posts right now.

Turnip Head wrote:I'm looking at MP, Made and Hedgeowl for my vote today, and I've got my eye on all the Snow Dog voters in general. I also want to see what happens with the suspicion on Enrique, and I plan on rereading MetalMarsh at some point.

Here's a link.

http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/search ... 5&sr=posts

birdwithteeth11 wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:Rip fingers

Guess who's not on the poll, Chris.
GOD-MOTHER****ING-DAMMIT! I CHECKED THE LIST 4 TIMES TO MAKE SURE I HAD EVERYBODY ON IT!!!!! *Rages*

But seriously, I will fix that now. And check AGAIN to make sure all the right names are on there.

Regardless

I have big things happening in the morning.

Rip fingers

Guess who's not on the poll, Chris.

MovingPictures07 wrote:
Roxy wrote:Thats right MP you gave him NO time to respond to the votes coming in.
No chance to defend.
You and zeek all over the place.
Snows first game back.
You know him better than me which is why I was dismayed when you did not give him the same chance as Daisy.

You all set up w/e I am going after baddies. Hedge is my target. Idt anything will change my mind about her.
Daisy is not bad though.

This is the post I am wondering about.

I don't have much time to post/respond to everything but one thing I want to know. MP, why did your read on SD (since Snow Dog is dead, this will be daisychains) suddenly change? I could have sworn you had wanted to vote her in the day phase?

S~V~S wrote:
zeek wrote:
S~V~S wrote:That was a horrible result, and the fact that it was so obvious made it even more horrible
What was obvious? That Snow Dog was civ? I have to disagree, it wasn't.
At the end of the lynch, that there was a save going on. Those three votes, glomming onto the suspicion of someone most people view as civvie. Especially MM with his "gotta save MP" thing , I did not but that at all
.

I know I said the Epi lynchlooked like a save, but this one was so overt. I am willing to drop my suspicions to keep the vote tight and vote for Made or one of the last Snowy voters.

Damned if I do....

MovingPictures07 wrote:Actually it's probably best to just keep the votes from being spread too much and other than that just vote our suspicions. Trying to coordinate these plans, while great in theory, I'm starting to think they just won't work at all.

I'm curious how you plan to do this anyway.

And stop posting things, you're keeping me from going to sleep.

zeek wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:I think we can assume that there was no manipulation in today's lynch at least.
I think this is going to be the entire debate of Day 4 tbh. I'm assuming nothing.

I hope not. Considering that the leading vote-getter was lynched, what's there to talk about in this context?

I feel like I'm going to have to reformulate my thoughts completely. You guys won't hear much from me the rest of the night ('cause I'll be gone/on the road). Thanks for staying up for the lynch zeek.

zeek wrote:Sorry, that wasn't well worded.

To keep this +1 from fucking with the will of the people, the person lynched needs to have two votes more than anyone else. We don't know what a tie will result in, so one vote isn't enough to keep it in our hands.

I think we can assume that there was no manipulation in today's lynch at least.

Linki: Don't forget yourself MP.

Linki 2: Good deal.

Linki 3: Woah linki

I blind-voted #3.

I won't be on much through Sunday afternoon. Sorry about the timing.

Enrique wrote:That's what he wanted to do. He was asking MP to change his vote until he got called out on how his plan made zero sense and so he changed it.

But um yeah that's not a bad point. Had he voted for Made already? Where was his vote?

linki- foogsndgsognweo

What? The linki part makes the most sense here.

Dom, just read my sequence of posts since this one. I think that'll answer them for you.

Linki: I fear for my life now. RIP Snowy.

Search found 385 matches