Search found 98 matches

by Marmot
Sun Jul 26, 2015 12:33 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Guess Who? Mafia
Replies: 785
Views: 27054

Re: Guess Who? Mafia

Golden wrote:
Roxy wrote:great fun little game even though I was killed off quickly I always enjoy games by Elo <3

Image


:shifty:
Roxy. I may have been bad, but I did keep you alive for a few nights.

(Primarily because it looked like you were really enjoying the game, and I was happy about that).
I wasn't having fun. :mad:

;)
by Marmot
Tue Jul 14, 2015 9:54 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Guess Who? Mafia
Replies: 785
Views: 27054

Re: Guess Who? Mafia

As mafia, were you informed if you got the most votes to ask a question? Did that have anything to do with your case on Hedgeowl?
by Marmot
Tue Jul 14, 2015 9:53 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Guess Who? Mafia
Replies: 785
Views: 27054

Re: Guess Who? Mafia

Well in that case, I was as surprised as you were that I got a question on Night 3.

In other exciting news, Cincinnati's Todd Frazier won the Home Run Derby last night. A small consolation for what some would call a dissappointing Reds' season.
by Marmot
Tue Jul 14, 2015 9:44 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Guess Who? Mafia
Replies: 785
Views: 27054

Re: Guess Who? Mafia

Dragon D. Luffy wrote:
Black Rock wrote:
Golden wrote:
Black Rock wrote:Congratulations. I was going to go after Golden but I was killed a night early. I even tried to leave like I somewhat believed him so maybe he wouldn't kill me. I knew he must be Mafia when Llama turned civ.
I was always very wary of you. But on that last night epi asked me who I was most worried about and I was very clear - timmer. So you did a good job with that one.
You should have killed him.
We thought he wasn't gonna be active again so early.
If you had killed timmer, Golden would have been the only one left alive with sunglasses. :eek:

Did you guys factor player avatars into your nightkills, or did you just kill people as you seemed fit?
by Marmot
Tue Jul 14, 2015 9:42 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Guess Who? Mafia
Replies: 785
Views: 27054

Re: Guess Who? Mafia

Epignosis wrote:I was apprehensive all morning yesterday that you weren't buying what I was selling, MM, and that you would persuade others to vote Golden.
I'm sure with timmer following your vote, you felt rather relieved at that point. You also grew rather quiet after your case, but I know you like to discourage others from posting too much after voting, so I didn't think much of it. And I happened to be chatting with Elohcin, and she said you were at the store. :P

Elohcin and I were also talking about the logistics of dropping info into the thread, and how far I could take it. As it ends up, I said too much, so she deleted a post of mine. I was kinda glad she did though. I was treading lightly with my posts because I didn't want to break any rules or take it too far (which I did anyway). Not having to worry about that, I was able to be more assertive.
by Marmot
Tue Jul 14, 2015 9:31 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Guess Who? Mafia
Replies: 785
Views: 27054

Re: Guess Who? Mafia

Dragon D. Luffy wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Also lol at MM having the info to take down Golden but never doing it because timmer was alive.
I've felt the fool quite a bit recently in endgames. Flash, RYM 86, this game... I don't know why you all keep my around so long. I've yet to win a game when making it to lylo as a civilian.
I'm not making fun of you about the shades thing though, you really had no option. You have 2 people with shades and didn't know who to pick. :P

But yeah, sometimes we have a rough streak in this game. It's okay though, I think you are pretty good at this game.
Yes, but I went after llama on Day 4 instead, certainly helped along by others. That was obviously a mistake. Apparently I was the only player with information after your lynch though. :P I can take some comfort in that.

And it appears I was right this last day phase about the voting. It was as I feared, in that one mafia had already voted Hedgeowl while one had not, putting the game out of reach with nothing I could do. I didn't feel great about Epignosis's case on Hedgeowl, but felt even worse about timmer following his vote. I was almost certain at that point that timmer was on a team with nijuu or Golden, but unfortunately, due to them not voting yet, there was no chance of lynching either of them.

So it was either follow the Hedge vote, or try to lynch timmer. :(
by Marmot
Tue Jul 14, 2015 2:43 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Guess Who? Mafia
Replies: 785
Views: 27054

Re: Guess Who? Mafia

Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Also lol at MM having the info to take down Golden but never doing it because timmer was alive.
I've felt the fool quite a bit recently in endgames. Flash, RYM 86, this game... I don't know why you all keep my around so long. I've yet to win a game when making it to lylo as a civilian.
by Marmot
Tue Jul 14, 2015 2:37 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Guess Who? Mafia
Replies: 785
Views: 27054

Re: Guess Who? Mafia

G-Man wrote:That was painful to watch play out. Golden, I will now vote for you automatically on Day 1 if there is no obvious baddie slip-up. As with Economics, you being bad only started to make sense to me near the very end. I never pegged Epi as a baddie. Did you guys plan to set up DDL to be steamrolled or did he come by that on his own? Either way, it was the perfect way for Epi and Golden to sink to the bottom of everyone's suspect lists.

I'm glad I was right about DDL and SD but that only helps confirm that I still totally suck as a civvie.

Well done, you two. I am about to pay you the highest compliment I can give in this game: I hate you both. :fist:
I voted him Day 1 and forgot to do it again. :(
by Marmot
Mon Jul 13, 2015 6:57 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Guess Who? Mafia
Replies: 785
Views: 27054

Re: Guess Who? Mafia

Voting for timmer. Sorry I couldn't be around to chat.
by Marmot
Mon Jul 13, 2015 4:16 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Guess Who? Mafia
Replies: 785
Views: 27054

Re: Guess Who? Mafia

I'm going to have to decide on my vote in the next hour or so.

Right now, I think any pairing of Epignosis or timmer with nijuu, Golden, or myself is off the table, because any such pairing that doesn't include Hedgeowl would be an automatic win (on the relatively safe assumption that Hedgeowl will miss the vote).

So the baddie team could be Epignosis and timmer

OR

Any combination of Golden, myself, and nijuu

OR

Hedgeowl with anybody else.



Thoughts?
by Marmot
Mon Jul 13, 2015 4:09 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Guess Who? Mafia
Replies: 785
Views: 27054

Re: Guess Who? Mafia

To expound, I have tried to think of a reason that Epignosis would have come in with this wild case on Hedgeowl while also being a baddie, and I can't think of a logical one.
by Marmot
Mon Jul 13, 2015 4:05 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Guess Who? Mafia
Replies: 785
Views: 27054

Re: Guess Who? Mafia

I was given the oppurtunity to ask a question after Night 3.

I have trouble believing that Epignosis faked doing so for Night 4.
by Marmot
Mon Jul 13, 2015 11:21 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Guess Who? Mafia
Replies: 785
Views: 27054

Re: Guess Who? Mafia

My gut reaction was civilian, but I also thought llama was mafia.

Currently, I think she could be bad for reasons I've already stated about Epignosis. But this is based on an assumption about Epignosis. As bizarre as this sounds, I believe that there is a good chance that she is bad, but I don't feel comfortable lynching her today.
by Marmot
Mon Jul 13, 2015 10:53 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Guess Who? Mafia
Replies: 785
Views: 27054

Re: Guess Who? Mafia

Each instance DDL interacted with or talked about timmer.
Spoiler: show
Dragon D. Luffy wrote:
timmer wrote:
Dragon D. Luffy wrote:
If she puts an avatar or gets replaced, we'll then be able to ask questions about her avatar. Problem solved.

I'm more suspicious of people who try to direct the game's attention into lynching inactives. :eye:
Hey Dragon, to get serious for a second here, you ARE aware that you made this post before Missing Person had posted, right? So technically, you were trying to direct the game's attention... into lynching an inactive.
No, I was trying to direct the game's attention into suspecting someone who was suspecting the inactive (llama).

Technically you could say I was helping make more people pay attention to MP, but that was the side effect, not the goal.
Dragon D. Luffy wrote:...

timmer: Not the most active poster, but made some interesting points in his posts. His vote was pretty weird, being a possibly very easy vote for a mafioso, or even a bussing, but he said so little it's hard to get a read. I'd like to see more before making a read.
Each instance DDL interacted with or talked about Golden.
Spoiler: show
Dragon D. Luffy wrote:The game is kind of dead so I'll try to post some quick reads on each player. Hopefully this will get some discussion going.

...

Golden: One of the most active players in the game, despite his multiple claims that he is not having time to play. Has argued with other players a lot, specially Roxy, and then voted MP after a lot of spceulation about him. So far seems to be a player who is trying to look at the game from multiple standpoints and solve it, which looks civilian at first hand. But I know Golden is more than capable of faking civilian behavior, and following other's opinions to stay with the flow of the game. I'll be careful before I label him town again. So far looks neutral to me.

...
Dragon D. Luffy wrote:I disagree with you guys, there was, at some point, a momentum for a Golden lynch. Call the reasoning for the posts random if you want, but he was leading the lynch at a point. The votes were there, and at least Roxy was fully on board with it, arguing with him and calling him mafia.

The momentum was short-lived though, which could mean that mafia managed to change the attention of the game to other targets, or could be simply mean the momentum was not strong enough.
Dragon D. Luffy wrote:
Golden wrote:I want to vote MM, and would do so if I thought I could definitely do it safely right now. But I'm wary of the possibility of needing to use my vote in self-defence again, so I'm holding it for now.

@DDL - I was third to get to equal two votes, which I suppose you could call 'leading' but really I believe momentum is better judged by the thread.
The whole thing is subjective, but you can't say there was "zero" momentum. There was some, and THEN it died down.
Dragon D. Luffy wrote:
Golden wrote:Vote anaylsis. Thread analysis. Two different things. It's great to see where they align and where they don't.

I'm more and more seeing a vote for DDL as a possibility here.
Sure thing. But the one I'm talking about is the former, not the later.

And the former is the one that gets baddies killed, not the later. The former would require a save from mafia if more people listened to Roxy and decided to take you down. Talk about the thread all you want, if one or two small voters suddenly showed up and said they wanted you dead, you'd be dead. You can't hide that.
Dragon D. Luffy wrote:
Golden wrote:DDL, you style does feel different to economics. In that game, it felt like you were quite perceptive to me, and you set out making perceptive posts to shine a light in different directions. I'm not seeing that here, it feels more like you are fighting arguments in your corner and refusing to see other perspectives even when people are making legitimate counter points.
I'm not gonna change my opinions just because somebody said they see them as evidence for me being scum. If you wanna convince me of something, do that with otes, not just threatening to lynch me.
Dragon D. Luffy wrote:
Golden wrote:
Dragon D. Luffy wrote:I'm kind of typing fast here so I can keep arguing with everyone and I'm making some mistakes.
That mistake was a pretty big one, no?

In any event, you weren't hearing arguments anyway. I said you were "refusing to see other perspectives even when people are making legitimate counter points". Thats my point. People WERE making legitimate counter points, and I think economics DDL would have considered them more carefully.

The biggest black mark against you, though, from my perspective, was jumping on the G-Man comment about there being momentum in voting for me yesterday. Because no matter how you slice it, if you read the thread it's clear that there just wasn't.
I may listen to your counter points but I have no obligation to agree with them. Yes, I'm a stubborn person. Deal with it.


Based on just these interactions alone, timmer looks far worse than Golden. DDL's and timmer's only direct interaction came on a post that was apparently misunderstood.

The interactions between Golden and DDL look sincere to me, and that is just from reading DDL's side of the interactions.
by Marmot
Mon Jul 13, 2015 10:08 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Guess Who? Mafia
Replies: 785
Views: 27054

Re: Guess Who? Mafia

If you weren't dead I'd go Master Detective all over you right now. :mafia:
by Marmot
Mon Jul 13, 2015 9:35 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Guess Who? Mafia
Replies: 785
Views: 27054

Re: Guess Who? Mafia

I have come to the conclusion that at least two of these players are mafia.
  • Epignosis
    Golden
    Hedgeowl
    nijuukyugou
    timmer
I ruled Epignosis off of this the other day, and I still believe he doesn't belong.

I considered nijuukyugou as a baddie, but I don't feel strongly about it.

So right now, I have it narrowed down to Golden, timmer, and Hedgeowl.
by Marmot
Mon Jul 13, 2015 8:57 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Guess Who? Mafia
Replies: 785
Views: 27054

Re: Guess Who? Mafia

Golden wrote:Seems I have a little more time than I thought, so I'm going to start looking back at people now.

First things first - I don't feel the need to read back hedgeowl. I think epi may have quoted every single post. I don't see anything there. Right now the only thing I have is 'am I to believe epi has info on hedgeowl'. He can only have info on one out of ninja and hedge, not both, so I really don't know if he is trying to get at one of those things, or if he is just being epi.

Which is really more of a read on epi than on hedgeowl anyway. I'll come back to epi later.

I doubt hedge has been placing the kills (would she need to?) She proclaimed llama was bad when everyone else did. Not much more to see.
I think I know what I see here.

Epignosis asked a question. He asked if a member of mafia is wearing a tiara.

And Hedgeowl would not have to be placing the kills. But note that she has showed up to post just after each deadline except for the last one, so she has certainly been around to send in a nightkill if she needed to.
by Marmot
Mon Jul 13, 2015 8:47 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Guess Who? Mafia
Replies: 785
Views: 27054

Re: Guess Who? Mafia

timmer wrote:Day 2 Daisy questioned Golden about his case against MM that MM had deliberately tried to change the intent of Golden's post by selectively trimming it. She then made a "statement vote" against Golden.
For the record, I did not try to deliberatetly change the intent of Golden's post, that was just how I understood it.
by Marmot
Mon Jul 13, 2015 12:20 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Guess Who? Mafia
Replies: 785
Views: 27054

Re: Guess Who? Mafia

Golden wrote:Hey everyone. Been fully involved in endgame of RYM87. Need a short mafia break but will be in here to catch up etc later tonight.

@linki - MM, I need at least a couple of hours to do some other stuff. But yes, I know, lylo, it's important, so once I've had my little break, all my attention is here.
Go get 'em tiger. :llama:
by Marmot
Mon Jul 13, 2015 12:19 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Guess Who? Mafia
Replies: 785
Views: 27054

Re: Guess Who? Mafia

Epignosis wrote:Now, a question for you, MM:

You seemed not to notice that I had voted for Hedgeowl, and proceeded with assumptions around timmer and nijuu. When I clarified about Hedgeowl, you insinuated that I don't care about this lynch, posted the eye, and then asked for the reason I voted Hedgeowl.

What are your current thoughts on Hedgeowl?
I am at a loss for words.
by Marmot
Mon Jul 13, 2015 12:16 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Guess Who? Mafia
Replies: 785
Views: 27054

Re: Guess Who? Mafia

Golden, get in here. This is lylo!
by Marmot
Sun Jul 12, 2015 10:00 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Guess Who? Mafia
Replies: 785
Views: 27054

Re: Guess Who? Mafia

Thank you.

What is your reason for voting for Hedgeowl?
by Marmot
Sun Jul 12, 2015 9:58 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Guess Who? Mafia
Replies: 785
Views: 27054

Re: Guess Who? Mafia

Epignosis wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:I take it this lynch does not mean that much to you?
If that's what you take, then that's what you take.

I am good with my vote.
You took the time to make a case on llama yesterday to justify your vote, even bringing up the fact that he never interacted with nijuukyugou until his late baddie list. You even voted late to observe other voters.

But today you vote Hedgeowl early, with nary a previous suspicion of her.

:eye:
by Marmot
Sun Jul 12, 2015 9:52 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Guess Who? Mafia
Replies: 785
Views: 27054

Re: Guess Who? Mafia

I take it this lynch does not mean that much to you?
by Marmot
Sun Jul 12, 2015 9:46 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Guess Who? Mafia
Replies: 785
Views: 27054

Re: Guess Who? Mafia

Did I misunderstand your previous post where you asked for amnesty for potentially being partially correct about a llama/nijuukyugou duo?
by Marmot
Sun Jul 12, 2015 9:24 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Guess Who? Mafia
Replies: 785
Views: 27054

Re: Guess Who? Mafia

Epignosis, remember when nijuu voted for Missing Person because of timmer's case on MP? You came in and pointed out your more original case on MP.

I think there's a connection there, and feel more strongly about it now than I did the other day.
Metalmarsh89 wrote:Here, nijuu follows timmer's reasons that Missing Person could be a baddie, and later acknowledges Epignosis's case. My gut feeling here is that nijuu and timmer are baddie partners, and nijuu followed his read of Missing Person because of this, but I could be reading to far into it. Personally, I say bad look for nijuu, but you be the judge.
nijuukyugou wrote:That was easy. I like this:
timmer wrote:Reading back further, the case that was brought out about DDL specifically mentioning that there would be a potential modkill of MP just adds to that. And Daisy suggested that MP should be given at least a day to get settled in, as well, so both of our baddies didn't seem to like the idea of people voting for MP. This may be enough for me to vote him today.
as well as the other supporting points about MP (basically I'm seeing the same thing being said regarding defense of inactives and MP being inactive, etc.). I'll go ahead and vote that way, too.
by Marmot
Sun Jul 12, 2015 9:00 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Guess Who? Mafia
Replies: 785
Views: 27054

Re: Guess Who? Mafia

Epignosis wrote:My essay pairing llama and nijuukyugou together was unsatisfactory.

Needs improvement.

Please see the teacher.

Is partial credit allowed? Because I think the "silent partner" section of my paper is A+. :nicenod:

If anybody complains about my vote going for an inactive, I'll see you after school. :suspish:

That's the bell.
What about timmer?
by Marmot
Sun Jul 12, 2015 8:24 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Guess Who? Mafia
Replies: 785
Views: 27054

Re: Guess Who? Mafia

Oh crap, I switched time zones and forgot to adjust my mental clock. RIP Black Rock.
by Marmot
Sun Jul 12, 2015 1:30 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Guess Who? Mafia
Replies: 785
Views: 27054

Re: Guess Who? Mafia

Oh, and I still have an ISO of you to do Golden. I will get around to that tomorrow.

Linki: And there's always the good old-fashioned scum-hunting.

Linki 2: ;)
by Marmot
Sun Jul 12, 2015 1:27 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Guess Who? Mafia
Replies: 785
Views: 27054

Re: Guess Who? Mafia

Elohcin wrote:4. As you, the civilian, receive information about a player's avatar........ You may not use a player's avatar to discuss whether the player is civilian or mafia. Doing so will result in a mod-kill. If you are unsure about something you want to say, please PM the host before posting.

11. No posting the contents of PMs- period.
Snipped for relevance. This looks to me like a no go. I guess looking from signs from the players you have voted for (which we're also not allowed to talk about) is your best bet.
by Marmot
Sun Jul 12, 2015 1:24 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Guess Who? Mafia
Replies: 785
Views: 27054

Re: Guess Who? Mafia

I think we're not allowed to talk about it the questions we ask.
by Marmot
Sun Jul 12, 2015 1:10 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Guess Who? Mafia
Replies: 785
Views: 27054

Re: Guess Who? Mafia

Regardless, we have to get it right tomorrow. If we lynch the wrong player, mafia wins.

Also, lol at your question BR. How do you expect Golden to answer?
by Marmot
Sun Jul 12, 2015 12:09 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Guess Who? Mafia
Replies: 785
Views: 27054

Re: Guess Who? Mafia

I'm sorry llama. You looked bad to me. Sorry to put you down.
by Marmot
Sat Jul 11, 2015 5:52 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Guess Who? Mafia
Replies: 785
Views: 27054

Re: Guess Who? Mafia

My parents still like to fly me home for visits, so I take the free flights. And flying out of a small city, I always have at least one layover, and often two.

My current experience with United Airlines has been dreadful. Delta has been a better experience, amd they take better care of their customers.

The actual flying itself isn't bad at all. Waiting on the plane is much better than waiting in the airport.
by Marmot
Sat Jul 11, 2015 5:27 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Guess Who? Mafia
Replies: 785
Views: 27054

Re: Guess Who? Mafia

Epignosis wrote:Hey, where you flying?

I've never been on a plane in my life.
Florida --> Chicago --> San Fran --> Eugene. Though now I've got some down time because the flight is delayed.

I don't recommend flying. It's expensive and usually not fun. Oh and it's near impossible to find a good meal.
by Marmot
Sat Jul 11, 2015 5:12 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Guess Who? Mafia
Replies: 785
Views: 27054

Re: Guess Who? Mafia

Epignosis wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Epignosis wrote:I'll vote either llama or nijuu. I predict they are the final two.
You waiting to see how nijuu will vote?
Now that you have voted, I will vote for you, and complete my master plan! :dark:
Just because I called timmer the sexiest player in this game? :confused:
by Marmot
Sat Jul 11, 2015 5:07 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Guess Who? Mafia
Replies: 785
Views: 27054

Re: Guess Who? Mafia

Epignosis wrote:I'll vote either llama or nijuu. I predict they are the final two.
You waiting to see how nijuu will vote?
by Marmot
Sat Jul 11, 2015 4:53 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Guess Who? Mafia
Replies: 785
Views: 27054

Re: Guess Who? Mafia

In between flights and no time. I'm voting llama. It is between him and Golden for me right now, but I haven't given Golden a proper look yet.

So llama gets my vote.
by Marmot
Sat Jul 11, 2015 12:21 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Guess Who? Mafia
Replies: 785
Views: 27054

Re: Guess Who? Mafia

I've got a plane to catch, but I'll be back on in a couple hours.
by Marmot
Sat Jul 11, 2015 12:11 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Guess Who? Mafia
Replies: 785
Views: 27054

Re: Guess Who? Mafia

thellama73 wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote: Linki: Llama, are you mafia?
I'm actually not, believe it or not. But Golden is.
I won't deny that I think he is.

I don't believe you. You now have Golden, myself, and Epignosis who have posted cases against you today, and you have not acknowledged any of them. Instead, you are waiting for one-liners to respond to. There are 6 players (if my math is correct) that want you dead today, so I believe you are a baddie, and helping to protect your last baddie mate.

But, You and Golden are suddenly going after each other today too. You haven't mentioned Golden since early on, and I don't think Golden had a read on you either way before today. I see this as hardcore distancing. Golden even said he wishes he had moved his vote. I doubt it's true. Why would he have voted so early for me if he was really that suspicious of you?
by Marmot
Sat Jul 11, 2015 12:02 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Guess Who? Mafia
Replies: 785
Views: 27054

Re: Guess Who? Mafia

EBWOP: Well that was quite the /url fail.
by Marmot
Sat Jul 11, 2015 12:01 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Guess Who? Mafia
Replies: 785
Views: 27054

Re: Guess Who? Mafia

Epignosis wrote:I go to sleep and three people vote. :|

Ricochet suspected thellama73. Ricochet died.
G-Man listed thellama73 as a "maybe Mafia." G-Man died.
fingersplints named thellama73 as her biggest suspect. fingersplints died.
Roxy wanted to lynch thellama73. Roxy died.

I could see llama executing these four and then mocking the kills; the (secretly) self-depreciating humor would amuse him.

His first two votes were inconsequential, but the Day 3 vote tied it up between Black Rock and spacedaisy. After spacedaisy got lynched, llama reiterated his suspicion of Black Rock, and doesn't mention her again until here. In the meantime, he suddenly became convinced to vote for Missing Person.

I have other things rolling around upstairs, but they will have to wait until I get back.

Now if you'll excuse me, I have to go buy beer and dirt. :mafia:
One thing I forgot to mention. Ricochet was nightkilled Night 1. Llama and Ricochet have had a grudge against each other since the day Ricochet joined the Syndicate.

I noticed this trend and agree with your assessment. The first night periods, llama interacted with G-Man and Ricochet, calling them both civilian, and they each were nightkilled hours later. The fingersplints kill was a change from the norm, but as you say, she called llama her biggest suspect and continuing the trend would make things all the more obvious.

And you're buying dirt? Are you going to play {url=http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... f=30&t=565]Dirt Mafia[/url]? :grin:

Linki: Llama, are you mafia?
by Marmot
Sat Jul 11, 2015 11:54 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Guess Who? Mafia
Replies: 785
Views: 27054

Re: Guess Who? Mafia

And now for Mr. timmer man, the dude with the sexiest avatar in this game. :grin: After my tin-foil hat theory in my ISO of nijuu, I'll try to keep this open-minded.



Timmer starts the game being rather noncommittal and diplomatic. But I won't fault him for such behaviors on Day 1.
Spoiler: show
timmer wrote:While I don't really like that Roxy and splints said they wouldn't vote MP due to a missing avatar (this game DOES revolve around having one, naturally) I would NOT say that splints' posts have been defeatist. Veteran players sometimes just know where they stand, and are happy to put it out there and make people vote them for it. Like, if splints is civ, and meant what she said, there is nothing for her to do or say at this moment than just hope for the best. Veteran players know that sometimes you get lynched on Day 1 for stupid things and tend not to take it personally.

It's not technically throwing in the towel, it's just being comfortable with what you've said and accepting that sometimes you get the heave ho early in a game and that's how mafia works.

I'm more interested in the people trying actively to stir shit up.
Timmer goes after DDL on Day 1, but was corrected and backed off. This reads as sincere to me, but I could be wrong. Timmer was trying to connect MP to DDL, and later helped get Missing Person lynched. This would be a hard thing for a teammate of DDL today, and easier to see coming from a civilian.
Spoiler: show
timmer wrote:
Dragon D. Luffy wrote:
If she puts an avatar or gets replaced, we'll then be able to ask questions about her avatar. Problem solved.

I'm more suspicious of people who try to direct the game's attention into lynching inactives. :eye:
Hey Dragon, to get serious for a second here, you ARE aware that you made this post before Missing Person had posted, right? So technically, you were trying to direct the game's attention... into lynching an inactive.
timmer wrote:
Dragon D. Luffy wrote:
No, I was trying to direct the game's attention into suspecting someone who was suspecting the inactive (llama).

Technically you could say I was helping make more people pay attention to MP, but that was the side effect, not the goal.
Yes, you're right, I actually misread the gist of your post, there.
Bad look for timmer here. I don't understand how one can suspect another player for voting to lynch an inactive, and go on to random-vote. It's even more suspicious because the player he voted ended up being a baddie. Maybe I am incorrect and timmer did try to set up the DDL-MP connection early on with nefarious reasons?
Spoiler: show
timmer wrote:This is the first 24 hour day game I've played in forever, I just realized the deadline is coming. I have no idea who to vote for. I don't get any bad vibes from Roxy, splints, Dragon, MP, Epig or llama. I'm going to vote for space daisy as she didn't really contribute and it's as good as a pure random for the moment.
Timmer votes for Spacedaisy Day 3 after missing the Day 2 lynch. Let it be known that to this point, timmer has only voiced suspicion (one of them a misunderstanding) of DDL and Spacedaisy, both baddies. Either he has been spot on with his reads, or he knows things others don't. But in a game where information comes to civilians, I can't rule out the latter of these options still potentially making him civilian. Still, I don't think this is a good look for him.
Spoiler: show
timmer wrote:I'm finally able to get back into this game, I'm so sorry for my absence.

I just read back and caught up completely. I see the points on BR but for me, SpaceDaisy is where its at. Her Day 1 vote was weak and directly saved DDL's bacon. Her Day 2 vote was a throwaway and her comments on DDL at the time read like a teamie trying to "say something".
Timmer is ambivalent about myself and Golden. Another noncommittal post.
Spoiler: show
timmer wrote:I've just reread the Golden/MM posts, and I'm quite ambivalent about them both. Golden is right that MM snipped his post, but MM also seems right that there were logical reasons to do so (he only wanted to comment on one part of the post). I've done this myself though I usually put a (post snipped) type of comment on it.

MM is also right that it's odd that Daisy seemed to refer to MM halfway through a post about Golden in a way that suggested a prior conversation, but I don't necessarily agree that that makes Golden look bad. Anyone could have talked to Daisy in BTSC about Golden and MM. In short, I'm not likely to vote either of them today.
Timmer revisits the early connection he pointed out between Missing Person and DDL. Missing Person went on to be lynched, but this is the only other player timmer has looked at throughout this game. After the successful lynch of DDL, I don't blame him for revisiting though. It does make sense, so this is a slightly good look for timmer.
Spoiler: show
timmer wrote:Reading back further, the case that was brought out about DDL specifically mentioning that there would be a potential modkill of MP just adds to that. And Daisy suggested that MP should be given at least a day to get settled in, as well, so both of our baddies didn't seem to like the idea of people voting for MP. This may be enough for me to vote him today.

@llama, I'll read back thru Hedge, is there something in particular I should look for?


Addendum: So the list of players timmer has suspected through this game includes just DDL, Spacedaisy, and Missing Person. All three are now dead, so I would love to hear more from timmer. I give him a neutral read right now.

Linki: Will read momentarily.
by Marmot
Sat Jul 11, 2015 11:34 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Guess Who? Mafia
Replies: 785
Views: 27054

Re: Guess Who? Mafia

Guess what nijuukyugou, it's your turn!

12 posts from nijuu thus far, so this one will not take very long.



Nijuu's first post of the game. I know she is known for quality over quantity when it comes to post content, and she has not disappointed this game. She comments early on the DDL case, siding against him. She also was one of the few players to cut TH some slack for a day at least. TH only received 4 votes, but nijuu was one of the only ones to vote differently, placing her vote on DDL instead. She did miss the vote Day 2, the day DDL was lynched though.
Spoiler: show
nijuukyugou wrote:Okay. Thoughts on what's been discussed:

1) I don't have pings about people claiming to vote Missing Person if she doesn't put up a picture by the end of the Day. Honestly, I see their point - it seriously disadvantages the civs if she is mafia. But I also read it as a bit of a Day 1 joke, so I didn't take the threat as seriously as some.
2) Roxy/FS buddy-buddy - Didn't really see it as buddy-buddy, but as simple agreement with the not-voting-newbies sentiment. I don't agree with the sentiment at all times, but if that's your bag, that's your bag. I do think it's interesting that it was pointed out, however, that MP (it's weird calling her MP, since it makes me think of the other MP :P) is not a newbie, so the point, I suppose, is moot.
3) Dragon's pinging me the most out of anyone, mayhaps because of the confident-sounding "guess" that MPerson (god dangit, that looks too much like A Person) would be modkilled/replaced, and claiming that FS was being "defeatist" so soon. There's a vibe about him I don't like in his posts. Hi, Dragon! We haven't met :biggrin:
4) While I see the logic in voting TH for being absolutely inactive (hurts on both sides), I'd at least like to give the guy a day to sort himself out if necessary, even if he has been AWOL in recent games.

I think that's it.
nijuu calls me weird. :( Still, I suppose I'm used to that. But she did not pursue it, given the opportunity.
Spoiler: show
nijuukyugou wrote:RIP TH and Rico :( As excited as I was for this game to start, I've nearly forgot I was playing it! Sorry y'all
Golden wrote:I'm also getting more and more suspicious of MM's approach to me. He demanded I answer what I think is a very strange question, and in doing so continued to avoid answering mine - which is why did he misrepresent my post. When I quote people, I don't cut it off half sentence... I quote the whole sentence or paragraph for context and underline the relevant bit. That felt really snaky to me.

Also, elo, is talking about the name we might PM in allowed or not?
I agree with this - MM's behavior is weird in this regard, even for a newt.
Nijuu posts after she missed the Day 2 vote in the lynch of DDL. I would expect she would have voted for DDL based on her Day 1 observations.
Spoiler: show
nijuukyugou wrote:Oh fuckity fuckballs, I missed the vote! (I literally just said this out loud. I haven't missed a vote in ages :disappoint: ) I apologize to my fellow players and the almighty hostess for my behavior. I haven't even had a chance to read what I've missed (I've been moving furniture up three flights of stairs all weekend/blowing shit up for the Fourth) but I see Mr. Luffy has been caught. Most excellent. When I'm settled I'll catch up and check back in.
Nijuu calls me weird again. This time, she latches on to what Roxy said. I don't like this statement at all from nijuu. As I explained to Roxy, I never self-voted in this game. You can look at the vote records to prove it. Nijuu says she "suspects self-voters regardless of alignment". I don't know if she is trying to say she suspects me or not, but there is no reason to do so right now. Nijuu is either not paying attention, or I've misunderstood, or she is intentionally shrouding suspicion on me. Unless this is the second of these two, this post doesn't look good for nijuu.
Spoiler: show
nijuukyugou wrote:Yay caught up! I suppose that's the advantage of such a quiet game.
Roxy wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Roxy wrote:Quick read back-

Metalmarsh ignored my question :pout:

Golden - I hear what you are saying but what you accuse Metalmarsh of you are doing to me over this I won't vote for new or returning players.

Dragon- I don't get you list it is a bit wonky imo. Like you posted it to just to post. Some of you reasoning you used to say people were leaning slightly town is the same reasoning you used to say someone was feeling mafia. It felt a lot like mud flinging.

Imma be busy today with a hike and picnic but should be back to post before deadline
Was this the question? Sorry, thought you were joking since I haven't self-voted in a while, though I guess I also haven't played with you in a while.

Self-voting as a strategy to draw out mafia only works so many times before people catch on. ;airguitar:

Wat?

This a bizarre response MM. When and how did you ever find a baddie with a self vote day 1? I don't remember that ever happening.
I still feel weird about MM, and had the same thought as Roxy - I often suspect self-voters regardless of alignment, and I don't ever recall that strategy finding a baddie. Also, his interactions (and lack thereof) with Golden make me itchy.
thellama73 wrote:What do we make of Dragon's vote for Black Rock? Would it be clever of him to vote for a teammate with his dying breath to throw us off the scent? Or does that vote make her look better? I'm incluned to distrust it.
Quite clever. I'm torn on this, but I'd almost like to see it used as a strategy - I get tired of seeing the same old same old :P The points brought up about BR and her shady TH vote make me look in her direction for baddiness.

That's all I can think of for now. Sorry for my horrible lack of participation; I should be better now for at least a couple of days :biggrin:
Here, nijuu follows timmer's reasons that Missing Person could be a baddie, and later acknowledges Epignosis's case. My gut feeling here is that nijuu and timmer are baddie partners, and nijuu followed his read of Missing Person because of this, but I could be reading to far into it. Personally, I say bad look for nijuu, but you be the judge.
Spoiler: show
nijuukyugou wrote:That was easy. I like this:
timmer wrote:Reading back further, the case that was brought out about DDL specifically mentioning that there would be a potential modkill of MP just adds to that. And Daisy suggested that MP should be given at least a day to get settled in, as well, so both of our baddies didn't seem to like the idea of people voting for MP. This may be enough for me to vote him today.
as well as the other supporting points about MP (basically I'm seeing the same thing being said regarding defense of inactives and MP being inactive, etc.). I'll go ahead and vote that way, too.


Addendum: Nijuu appears the opposite as Black Rock to me. BR looked bad at the beginning, but better as the game went on. Nijuu on the other hand had a great Day 1, but has looked worse as the game goes on. I'd put her behind llama on my baddie list.
by Marmot
Sat Jul 11, 2015 11:05 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Guess Who? Mafia
Replies: 785
Views: 27054

Re: Guess Who? Mafia

BR, what do you think about Golden being mafia?
by Marmot
Sat Jul 11, 2015 8:21 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Guess Who? Mafia
Replies: 785
Views: 27054

Re: Guess Who? Mafia

Hooray! People are talking; this is great news. By popular request, thellama73 is next up.



Llama interacts with DDL on Day 1, discussing whether or not we should lynch Missing Person for not having an avatar. Typical llama banter, but this idea proposed by llama, coupled with MP's lack of participation, may be the strongest driving force for what was to become MP's lynch on Day 4.
Spoiler: show
thellama73 wrote:
Dragon D. Luffy wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
Dragon D. Luffy wrote:
thellama73 wrote:Also, I'm announcing now that I will vote for Missing Person if there is no avatar by the time I leave for the airport tomorrow.
Is that even a good idea? If Missing Person doesn't put an avatar she's just going to get modkilled, right?
It's an extremely good idea.
How so?
It's a good idea because a person without an avatar will be immune from detection by the methods the hostess has given us. And that's terrible.
According to llama, asking questions about avatars is the only way that we can discover who is bad, thread interactions and vote counts be damned. This also looks like a comment from a player who doesn't know how the civilian role power works. However, this observation was made on Day 1, so no player would have more knowledge than another as to how it worked.
Spoiler: show
thellama73 wrote:
Dragon D. Luffy wrote:I don't see much point. She is essentially not playing the game. If it stays like that, she is probably just getting replaced for being inactive, or modkilled. Sounds like a waste of a lynch.
She's not going to get modkilled, because Eloh doesn't do those things. She might get replaced, but that doesn't make her more likely to be good. It's only a waste of a lynch if she is not mafia. Right now, we can't find out whether she is mafia or not, because she has robbed us of our only way of doing so by not having an avatar. Seems like the best option to me.
Llama continues his Day 1 interactions with DDL. Good look for llama here. He points out the inaccuracy in DDL's comment, while still sticking to his own reads (if you call it that). The second half of the post doesn't really affect the read so much. Llama offers a more Syndicate-beneficial reason for lynching Missing Person.
Spoiler: show
thellama73 wrote:
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: I just think going after the inactives is a cheap way of making a vote. Because it's essentially a guess, and one that is more likely to get a townie lynched than otherwise. At least with active players it's possible to analyse their posts or something.
Baseless assertion, backed by zero evidence. Why is lynching an inactive more likely to get a townie than lynching an active player? Of course, lynching any player is more likely to get a townie than a baddie, because there are more townies than baddies, but the idea that an inactive is less likely to be bad than anyone else is simply untrue.
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: If she puts an avatar or gets replaced, we'll then be able to ask questions about her avatar. Problem solved.

I'm more suspicious of people who try to direct the game's attention into lynching inactives. :eye:
And voting for her until she puts up an avatar is a good way to incentivize the behavior I want. Lynching inactives is also a good way to have fewer inactives in this, and future games, which I like. If you think that makes me bad, vote for me, but don't pretend it is based on any kind of logic.
Llama says we have a 33% chance of lynching a baddie. Bad look for llama I think. He says there is a 4 / 12 chance that we lynch a baddie, when there are 12 civilians, not 12 total players.
Spoiler: show
thellama73 wrote:
Roxy wrote:
thellama wrote:Baseless assertion, backed by zero evidence. Why is lynching an inactive more likely to get a townie than lynching an active player? Of course, lynching any player is more likely to get a townie than a baddie, because there are more townies than baddies, but the idea that an inactive is less likely to be bad than anyone else is simply untrue
Do you have proof to back up your certainty?
I don't need to, since I am not the one making a positive claim and that's not how burden of proof works, and it's also no longer relevant since Dragon explained what he meant, but sure, I'll play.
Elohcin wrote: There 16 players in this speed game. 12 players are civilians and 4 players are Mafia.
The probability of any player being bad is therefore 4 / 12 = 0.33, so the odds of lynching a civilian from a random vote are 2/3. Regarding the second part of my sentence, if if Missing Person had not yet checked in at the time, and her role was assigned randomly, then her odds of being bad are no better or worse than anyone else's. We would not expect any behavior to tip her hand, because a) there was no behavior to observe and b) she herself would not know her role yet (having not checked in.)

QED
Llama explains that there are still several players to check in. Quite the turnaround considering he was endorsing lynching inactives just a few hours before. 35 minutes later, llama turns around and says he's going to vote for Turnip Head, the only player who had not checked in yet (after being doubly corrected by G-Man). Very bad look for llama.
Spoiler: show
thellama73 wrote:Guys, an awful lot of people haven't even checked in yet. Settle down.
thellama73 wrote:I'm probably going to vote for Turnip Head just to piss everyone off.
Here, llama responds to Ricochet's massive case with this two-liner. In llama's defense, he was out of town for Fourth of July, so may not have been able to make a proper response. Still, Ricochet was killed Night 1, saving llama from having to give a proper address to the case.
Spoiler: show
thellama73 wrote:Great points by Ricochet. I like the way he is playing. The reason I ultimate didn't vote for MP (who I still think is a girl) is that his posts read extremely cig to me once he actually showed up. Too bad about TH though.
Llama votes for DDL Day 2. Not much to say about his vote, as it put DDL up 5-1 over Black Rock.
Spoiler: show
thellama73 wrote:Dragon is a smooth criminal. Down he goes.
Llama comes back from his vacation, says he's all caught up, and only addresses Spacedaisy (a "Maybe mafia") in his new rainbow list. No mention of the three "Probably Mafia" that he listed in this post, nor before this post, aside from Golden.

Also noteworthy, Missing Person has made his way into llama's "Probably Not Mafia" list.
Spoiler: show
thellama73 wrote:Hi all! Back from a holiday weekend and all caught up. Very happy Dragon is dead. He was, as I believe I said,a smooth criminal.

Here's my technicolor list of player evaluations. Spacedaisy is where she is because her vote for Golden would be madness for a Dragon teammate. I think Golden's Day 1 vote looks exceptionally bad in hindsight.


Probably Mafia
Black Rock
Golden
Hedgeowl

Maybe Mafia
spacedaisy
timmer
MetalMarsh89
Epignosis

Probably Not Mafia
fingersplints
Missing Person
nijuukyugou
Roxy
G-Man
thellama73
Llama's first mention of Black Rock. Considering BR is his number 1 mafia read, this post isn't very convincing.
Spoiler: show
thellama73 wrote:What do we make of Dragon's vote for Black Rock? Would it be clever of him to vote for a teammate with his dying breath to throw us off the scent? Or does that vote make her look better? I'm incluned to distrust it.
Llama calls out the mafia for being absent and unthoughtful. The absentness seems to match up with his Rainbow List. Convenient. Llama offers some thoughts on Black Rock and comments on Spacedaisy, indifferently. Llama also chose to comment on myself and Golden. He says he did a reread of both of us, but said little more than he doesn't suspect either of us. Considering the length of this post, there is not much going on. Llama is clearly pushing a lynch in the direction of Black Rock here.
Spoiler: show
thellama73 wrote:The G-Man kill has given me a lot to think about. I think we are dealing with a mostly absent, panicky mafia getting rid of someone who was on their trail. The Ricochet kill was smart, but after the loss of DDL, the G-Man kill was artless. I agree with Epi that the team was MIA on Day 2. Epi, for example, would never have allowed such a kill if he were mafia.

Spacedaisy defended DDL and pushed a Golden lynch.
Hedgeowl has a total of three, mostly off-topic posts, and would likely throw down a reflex NK.
Black Rock wrote:
fingersplints wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
fingersplints wrote:
thellama73 wrote:I'm probably going to vote for Turnip Head just to piss everyone off.
Why would that piss everyone off?
People hate when I vote for non-participants or people who "have not had the chance to defend themselves."
Turnip Head has been absent in several games though, so I think this is a different situation.
I agree and am also going to vote for Turnip Head.
What is BR agreeing with here? That she wants to piss people off? That people hate it when I vote for non-participants? Her vote is poorly explained. She goes on:
Black Rock wrote:
Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Bummer. That was some really solid play you were making here, Ricochet. Hope I play again with you some time.

I'm reading through day 1 posts and BR's ones caught my attention. It feels to me her vote on TH was pretty oportunistic. She only agreed with what splints said then jumped on the wagon later in the phase, after waiting for two players to do it first. And did not say much more. I'm leaning mafia on her.
TBH it was opportunistic and a little frustration with TH atm. It was day 1 none of you really look that suspicious and so I voted for a non-player. He is a non-player and I don't think he would have ever showed up. I actually wasn't waiting for more people to do it. I didn't have to wait for other players to do it at all, I was already taking an easy way out.
Interesting little exchange with Dragon. She defended him earlier, saying "why are you focusing on Dragon?" I think BR looks bad.

Now, MM< because I promised:
He also gently pushed a Golden lynch, but other than that, he reads pretty genuine to me. I also feel better about Golden after rereading him, but am not ready to completely absolve him yet.
Again, llama fits the nightkill of G-man into his own definition of baddieness. Llama says the baddies are scared and disorganized. Epignosis offered a more accurate observation I believe. Epignosis said it made sense for the mafia to kill an analytical player. Ricochet Night 1, G-Man Night 2. The trend is short, but clear. Another trend I've noticed, both players to be nightkilled to this point both had gone after llama the night they were killed.
Spoiler: show
thellama73 wrote:
fingersplints wrote: Llama why do you think the kill of Gman was artless?
Because G-Man was one of the most active and productive players in terms of baddie hunting. It's always possible that the kill was a frame job, but I usually find thta such kills happen when the team is scared and simply trying to reduce the vote count against it.
"Mafia is running scared"? That's what he said after the logical nightkill of G-Man. Maybe I have my blinders on, but llama is looking worse and worse as this game goes on.
Spoiler: show
thellama73 wrote:
Elohcin wrote:
fingersplints has been put down by the mafia. It is now Day 4
My goodness what a boring choice. This mafia is running scared.

RIP Splints.
Llama finally makes a real mention of Hedgeowl. But this mention is hardly anything to sneeze at.

Also llama says that the baddies are not voting to save their members. Let's look at Black Rock's and Spacedaisy's votes. I'd look at Hedgeowl's too, llama's other top suspect, but she has not voted yet this game...

Anyway, Day 1, both Spacedaisy and Black Rock vote for Turnip Head to put him 4-3 over DDL. We don't know about Black Rock, but Spacedaisy, an obvious baddie, voted to save DDL.

Day 2, Spacedaisy voted for Golden and Black Rock missed the vote in a landslide DDL lynch. That's about as close to a save as could have happened.

Day 3, Black Rock voted Spacedaisy who flipped bad. Black Rock voted out of self-preservation, so one can't fault her for it, nor was there even a situation to go for a save. Spacedaisy missed the vote.

Day 4, Missing Person won in a landslide victory, so no save required. Anyway, Black Rock voted for llama.

Baddies are not voting to save their members? These are llama's top two suspects right?
Spoiler: show
thellama73 wrote:
Black Rock wrote:I just got home from work, I can participate with you Llama.

Who are you looking at this lynch?
I'm really in a Hedgeowl sort of mood. I am super unimpressed with this mafia. They are not voting to save their members and their kills are lame. I think there is at least one inactive or barely active player among them.

Also, Hedgebaddie is always bad.
Llama says one of the people who wants him dead is likely mafia. This looks to me like another scenario to fit his Rainbow List that doesn't have any actual support to it.
Spoiler: show
thellama73 wrote:Three people want me dead. Likely only one of them is bad. I'm pretty sure it isn't Roxy, so that leaves BR and Hedgebaddie.

I actually feel a little better about Hedgebaddie since she started posting, but on the other hand she has participated for the first time ONLY after I straight up threatened to vote for her, which looks bad to me. Also, her name is a dead giveaway.
I still think Black Rock looks pretty bad too, so I will have to choose between one of them tomorrow.
Suddenly, llama wants to go after Golden again, even with BR and Hedgeowl still alive. It is good that he is revisiting a previous read. Brownie point for llama.
Spoiler: show
thellama73 wrote:Spacedaisy's comments about Golden are very interesting. When DDL was up for a lynch, she placed a protest vote on Golden. When she was up for a lynch, she suggested we look at Golden after her demise. This is some high-level distancing. Maybe the mafia are not as inept as I thought.
Llama goes after Golden with the most conviction he's had all game, even giving him an early vote. Well, llama's had conviction before, but he's hardly backed anything up with quotes and evidence before this.
Spoiler: show
thellama73 wrote:Meh, I decided that defensive voting is for cowards. If I get lynched, I want to go out in a blaze of glory, tilting ferociously at those lovely windmills.
:knight3:

I'm voting for Golden for three reasons.
1. The itiming of his Day 1 vote looked like an effort to protect DDL to me.
2. I believe Spacedaisy was engaging in high-level distancing when she attacked him. Her attacks came when either she or her teammate were in troble.
3. He expressed suspicion of me, but voted for MM anyway, early and a bit of a throwaway. I believe he did this because I am more suspected by the thread in general, and therefore more useful for a mafia member to keep around, and because it keeps his hands clean of my innocent blood should I actually get lynched.

Oh, and I almost forgot. A Golden lynch gives me Mafia Bingo.


Addendum: I think llama looks bad. There's a large portion of his game that looks bad, and there is not enough good actions to counter that. Through my ISO's thus far, llama is definitely my strongest mafia read.
by Marmot
Fri Jul 10, 2015 11:50 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Guess Who? Mafia
Replies: 785
Views: 27054

Re: Guess Who? Mafia

I'm off to bed. I will continue tomorrow. Hopefully this can kickstart some discussion.
by Marmot
Fri Jul 10, 2015 11:46 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Guess Who? Mafia
Replies: 785
Views: 27054

Re: Guess Who? Mafia

Skipping Golden for now because I'm getting tired. Here comes Hedgeowl. 9 posts! :huh:

Apologizes for not being around for the Day 1 lynch. Nothing else to see here really.
Spoiler: show
Hedgeowl wrote:Big voting fail! So sorry, but blanked on 24 hours and had guests too late by the time I realized my error.

Sorry to see you go TH, since I didn't get to play with you at all really.
Misses another vote. Day 1 all over again.
Spoiler: show
Hedgeowl wrote:I see I am not the only vote loser. Sorry, this weekend got way too busy and my little guy has decided bedtimes are for babies, so my evening mafia time has been usurped.

Back in the saddle this week though. congrats on the lynch to everyone who took him down!
Day 3 vote fail. I don't think she has figured out the vote deadline yet. :stare:
Spoiler: show
Hedgeowl wrote:Vote fail again...Sorry this voting while I make dinner clearly isn't working for me. I will try voting earlier, but it's always hard to do in 24 hr games when so much happens right at the lynch. Catching up and voting in Bullets now, but will do reading tonight. Sorry to be the invisible person this game. :ninja:

Linki hey good job everyone!
Day 4, same thing. That's four posts in a row of no contribution and apologizing for missing the deadline.
Spoiler: show
Hedgeowl wrote:
thellama73 wrote:Boo!

Hedgebaddie is so going down tomorrow.
I am basically a mafia fail right now. We are leaving for 10 days tomorrow to Wisconsin and I have been working like crazy to get us all ready. Plus have an all day workshop today and tomorrow. I apologize to everyone and Elo for my total not cutting it this game. I dont think its going to get any better on vacation since we will be with a lot of family all week long.
But this next post is good. I think Hedgeowl hit the nail on the head with llama. The lynch of Missing Person was a failure; if we learned something please someone point it out. I will look at it later if I get a chance. Anyway, after lynching an inactive for a slightly good reason, why go after a non-voter for no good reason? I have not seen anyone offer a good reason to lynch Hedgeowl, and I know llama wants to lynch her the most. So I think Hedgeowl is right in her reaction, though it does not excuse her four days of sub-par play. We need to hear more from her.
Spoiler: show
Hedgeowl wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
Roxy wrote:
thellama73 wrote:Boo!

Hedgebaddie is so going down tomorrow.

Oh yes use the strategy that worked so well for you in the last 2 low poster lynches. :huh:
Gambler's fallacy.
Oh please, I havent even read the thread from last lynch and I can tell you're bad. You're going for the low hanging fruit apparently, conveniently using the Hedgebaddie nickname once again, but actually targeting me as if that makes it some how legitimate and your vote for BR last lynch was so slim shady Eminem was embarrassed for you. Just looking at the poll, you can take no credit for lynching daisy and tied up BR when daisy had two votes.
Image


Addendum: We would love to hear more from Hedgeowl. If I were forced to choose, I would list her as a civilian read.
by Marmot
Fri Jul 10, 2015 11:28 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Guess Who? Mafia
Replies: 785
Views: 27054

Re: Guess Who? Mafia

Up next, Epignosis.

Epignosis was the first player to go after DDL, and did so early on Day 1. Epignosis placed the first vote on DDL on Day 1 as well.
Spoiler: show
Epignosis wrote:
Dragon D. Luffy wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
Dragon D. Luffy wrote:
thellama73 wrote:Also, I'm announcing now that I will vote for Missing Person if there is no avatar by the time I leave for the airport tomorrow.
Is that even a good idea? If Missing Person doesn't put an avatar she's just going to get modkilled, right?
Where did you get that idea?

Addendum: :ninja:
I didn't? It was just a guess. I've never played a game hosted by Elo so I don't know.
That's a pretty specific guess.
Epignosis responds to Golden's accusations of being quiet with a tired-sounding response, and a good reason case for lynching DDL later. I'm feeling good about Epignosis thus far, as well as his vote later on Day 1.
Spoiler: show
Epignosis wrote:
Golden wrote:One thing that bothers me a little is that some people are a little quieter than I'd like - epi, hedge, daisy and ninja come to mind for me here. Although it could be because of the conflated timeframe by which to make our first vote. I think I might seem quieter than usual too. But I have my eye on this going forward.
I'm a little tired of this. When I post a lot, people say I'm distracting. When I don't, people say I'm "a little quieter" than they like. I post when I have something to say. Sometimes that's a lot. Sometimes it's not.

I've questioned DDL on a few points here and there. The former item makes me wonder if DDL asked in BTSC what would happen if Missing Person didn't post an avatar, and the host told. He says it was a guess. I don't believe that. The second item exaggerates fingersplints' attitude and makes it into something it isn't.

Is there anything else you like from me, Lord Golden?
After the lynch and a bunch of OT posts, Epignosis calls Black Rock's vote out from the group, mainly because of her forgetting to vote. The circumstances look bad for BR, but I still believe her. She did post when she had planned on voting rather than doing a drive-by. I disagree with Epignosis here.
Spoiler: show
Epignosis wrote:Of the four, I find Black Rock's TH vote to be the fishiest. She said she would vote TH, but she held onto that vote and didn't vote until much later- three and a half hours later, less than an hour to the end of the poll. She says she forgot, but that was an important vote, and the timing was crucial: BR voted when both DDL and Golden had two votes, putting TH one vote over them.

Right after the lynch, she tried to drum up something against Golden based on a misunderstanding. There's little reason to do that if you are on a team together.

Therefore I believe Black Rock and DDL are bad.

Addendum: :ponder:
DDL does the same as Epignosis, and paints a bad light on BR for her vote, but for different reasons. Epignosis calls him out and pursues him for this. Another good look for Epignosis, and a bad one for Black Rock.
Spoiler: show
Epignosis wrote:
Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Black Rock: Didn't post much, jumped on TH's lynch wagon late and didn't do much other than agreeing with others said. Looks bad. I called her out on that and her defense at least looked honest, but it's not that hard of a defense to make.
Yeah, about that:
Black Rock wrote:
Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Bummer. That was some really solid play you were making here, Ricochet. Hope I play again with you some time.

I'm reading through day 1 posts and BR's ones caught my attention. It feels to me her vote on TH was pretty oportunistic. She only agreed with what splints said then jumped on the wagon later in the phase, after waiting for two players to do it first. And did not say much more. I'm leaning mafia on her.
TBH it was opportunistic and a little frustration with TH atm. It was day 1 none of you really look that suspicious and so I voted for a non-player. He is a non-player and I don't think he would have ever showed up. I actually wasn't waiting for more people to do it. I didn't have to wait for other players to do it at all, I was already taking an easy way out.
This is what sounds honest to you? No mention of forgetting to vote here.
Epignosis wrote:
Dragon D. Luffy wrote:It is honest because if she is a townie, then it is believable. She admits her vote is easy and says she only did it later because she forgot. It can happen.

But that doesn't mean she can be called a townie, because as much honest as it COULD be, it is still an easy excuse for a mafioso to make. Honest =/= civilian-like. Her vote was still one of the worst in the phase, together with her post history.
That's circular reasoning.
Epignosis wrote:
Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Look, the point is, she could have came up with an excuse for her lack of activity and bad vote, but instead she openly came out and said "yeah my vote sucked". Even if she is mafia, there is a degree of honesty to it, because she is admitting her vote sucked.

The problem is that if she is mafia, this is an effective strategy to get people's sympathies without having to come up with an excuse.
Mmm.

Her vote sucked. I don't care about that. I care that she "forgot" to vote and then voted at a crucial moment.
Epignosis wrote:
Dragon D. Luffy wrote:One possibility is that you're mafia trying to get me lynched. But if you're town, then at the very least it means you're being sloppy.
And the other possibilities are...? That G-Man is independent? Nope. Don't see any of those.

It's equivocal posts like this that I look for, especially early on. "Maybe this, maybe that." That, plus some of the unscrupulous claims you made Day 1, like fingersplints being a defeatist?

I've already said I am most suspicious of Black Rock and DDL.

Guess who got my vote?
Epignosis wrote:
Dragon D. Luffy wrote:
Epignosis wrote:Yes, this shit again.
Then I suppose I gotta dig into that thread and quote one of the one million posts where I explain why I like to explore multiple possibilities when I talk about things? Points which you did agree with?
"You could either be bad or you could be good."

Those are possibilities you like to explore and feel the need to post?

:suspish:

With what points did I agree?
After DDL flipped mafia, Epignosis decided to focus his attention solely on Black Rock and Missing Person. Epignosis pursues his original case on DDL that was related to MP. MP ultimately has flipped civilian, proving Epignosis wrong. However, I do not think Epignosis looks bad for this. After the correct read of DDL, a look down this avenue of thought makes sense.
Spoiler: show
Epignosis wrote:I may vote for Missing Person.
Dragon D. Luffy wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
Dragon D. Luffy wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
Dragon D. Luffy wrote:
thellama73 wrote:Also, I'm announcing now that I will vote for Missing Person if there is no avatar by the time I leave for the airport tomorrow.
Is that even a good idea? If Missing Person doesn't put an avatar she's just going to get modkilled, right?
Where did you get that idea?

Addendum: :ninja:
I didn't? It was just a guess. I've never played a game hosted by Elo so I don't know.
That's a pretty specific guess.
I guess? The point wasn't exactly about her getting modkilled or replaced, but about her getting dealt with by the host so we wouldn't have to worry about figuring out her alignment by ourselves.
Knowing that DDL was Mafia, I am going to again raise the question I implied here: What gave DDL the notion that Missing Person was going to get modkilled if no avatar was put in place? Perhaps it was stated in the initial team PM. I know the host likes to chat in chat, so maybe the issue was raised there.
Dragon D. Luffy wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: If she puts an avatar or gets replaced, we'll then be able to ask questions about her avatar. Problem solved.

I'm more suspicious of people who try to direct the game's attention into lynching inactives. :eye:
And voting for her until she puts up an avatar is a good way to incentivize the behavior I want. Lynching inactives is also a good way to have fewer inactives in this, and future games, which I like. If you think that makes me bad, vote for me, but don't pretend it is based on any kind of logic.
Well my goal here is to find mafia, not to fight inactivity, so I gotta disagree.
Keep in mind, that this conversation was about Missing Person, and DDL claims his goal was to find Mafia, and that he finds those who want to lynch an inactive is suspicious. Neither is the case, we know that now. Yet he voted for Missing Person Day 1 anyway. Why?

DDL asked Missing Person about Roxy and fingersplints and then...that's kind of it. DDL said he was keeping an eye on those interested in lynching inactive people. Why say that if you're Mafia, and then vote for someone who had been at one point and now is inactive?
Dragon D. Luffy wrote:I'm leaning on voting MP right now. Not much because of the avatar thing, but I didn't like the way he compared Roxy and splints, or the way he set a lynch between splints and llama. The whole thing felt forced to me.

Splints is somewhat suspicious for that matter, but my main reason for suspecting her was kind of shitty so I'm giving her a pass. Still not sure what to think of her sudden defense of MP.
The "pass" given to fingersplints is funny to me, because Missing Person's last post was:
Missing Person wrote:I completely overslept and missed deadline.

Unless things change, I'm probably voting splints next phase.
Something to keep in mind.

I'll be voting Black Rock or Missing Person, methinks.
Epignosis offers a defence of Spacedaisy here the day she is lynched. I did witness the amazing game Daisy played in Death Note and can attribute that this was game was not quite on par with that one. Null read here for Epignosis.

Side note: Epignosis mentioned that DDL was lurking at this moment. The list of players online around that time (based on post times) includes: thellama73, Golden, nijuukyugou, Epignosis, and Black Rock.
Spoiler: show
Epignosis wrote:
Golden wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
Golden wrote:@epi - what do you think bad daisy would have done in that situation? I don't follow your train of thought here at all.
In what situation? Day 1 or Day 2?
Day 2.
Any vote she made at the time she made it was going to look bad. And, unless she had voted DDL Day 1, that was probably true then too.

From my experience in Death Note, bad spacedaisy is more fiery. Day 2, she didn't show up at all until the very end and voted you instead. I don't know what bad spacedaisy would do in that situation, but is what she did it? I don't think it is. If she is bad, then I don't think she talked strategy with her team. Or perhaps there's no one but DDL to talk to. I see him lurking. ;)

To be fair, I applied this litmus test to Black Rock. What would Black Rock gain from trying to save DDL Day 1 and then miss the vote Day 2? That doesn't seem like her. I've never been on a team with spacedaisy, but I've been on one with her. Black Rock is a team player. So huh.

That leaves me with Missing Person. But I'm open to other ideas before I leave to thump on the bass like our dearly departed Chris Squire. :rip:
Epignosis defends Roxy, mainly because of an assessment Roxy made of Epignosis. I feel good about this statement from him.
Spoiler: show
Epignosis wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Epignosis wrote:You do?

I don't.
Why not?
It's funny to me that you want reasons after you voted. Next time, maybe you'll discuss things before you vote, yeah?

But since you asked me a question:

I appreciated her assessment of me. An evil Roxy would try to crucify me if she thought I was wrong on something. And even though we disagree philosophically about low/non-posters, she's been (irritatingly) consistent on her stance.

So even if Missing Person is bad, I don't think Roxy is bad.


Epignosis looks good to me this game. A lot of good baddie-hunting and nothing that stands out not in his favor. I know Black Rock has accused him of closed-mindedness, but that's hardly indicative of a baddie, nor is it even outside of his realm of behaviour. See Death Note with regards to FZ.
by Marmot
Fri Jul 10, 2015 10:46 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Guess Who? Mafia
Replies: 785
Views: 27054

Re: Guess Who? Mafia

Roxy wrote:vacation sounds cool, are you camping?
Nope, a resort in Florida. Not my idea for a vacation, but at least I get to hang out with my family since I only see them twice or so a year.

Annd RIP Roxy.

Return to “Guess Who? Mafia”